Science Facing Aliens - Invasive Alien Species in Belgium - Belgian ...
Science Facing Aliens - Invasive Alien Species in Belgium - Belgian ... Science Facing Aliens - Invasive Alien Species in Belgium - Belgian ...
58 Strubbe D. & Matthysen E., 2009c. Predicting the potential distribution of invasive ringnecked parakeets Psittacula krameri in northern Belgium using an ecological niche modelling approach. Biological Invasions, 11: 497-513. Taylor B. W. & Irwin R. E. 2004. Linking economic activities to the distribution of exotic plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101: 17725-17730. Vermeersch G., Anselin A. & Devos K., 2006. Bijzondere Broedvogels in Vlaanderen in de periode 1994-2005. Populatietrends en recente status van zeldzame, kolonievormende en exotische broedvogels in Vlaanderen. Mededeling van het instituut voor natuur- en bosonderzoek, 2006(2). Instituut voor Natuur- en Bosonderzoek: Brussel : Belgium. 64 pp. Vermeersch G., Anselin A., Devos K., Herremans M., Stevens J., Gabriëls J. & Van Der Krieken B., 2004. Atlas van de Vlaamse broedvogels 2000-2002, Brussel. Weiserbs A. & Jacob J.-P., 2007. Oiseaux nicheurs de Bruxelles, 2000-2004: répartition, effectifs, évolution. AVES: pp 288. Westphal M. I., Browne M., MacKinnon K. & Noble I., 2008. The link between international trade and the global distribution of invasive alien species. Biological Invasions, 10: 391- 398. Williamson M., 1996. Biological Invasions, London: Chapman & Hall.
Patterns of Prunus serotina invasion in two contrasting forests Margot VANHELLEMONT 1 , Lander BAETEN 1 , Martin HERMY 2 & Kris VERHEYEN 1 1 Laboratory of Forestry, Ghent University, Geraardsbergsesteenweg 267, B-9090 Gontrode, Belgium 2 Division Forest, Nature and Landscape, K.U.Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200e, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium Introduction Prunus serotina Ehrh., a North-American tree species, is considered an invasive species in Western Europe. Most studies in its introduced range focused on areas heavily invaded by P. serotina. Nonetheless, the presence and abundance of P. serotina in these areas still reflects the massive plantings of the past (Starfinger et al. 2003). The large-scale plantings resulted in a high propagule pressure of P. serotina. Consequently, P. serotina exhibited a considerable invasion rate in these areas, which lead to problems in silviculture and nature conservation (Starfinger et al. 2003). Since actual rates of invasion appear to be largely determined by propagule pressure (Von Holle & Simberloff 2005), we wanted to study the spread of P. serotina in an area characterized by a far lower propagule pressure where the species has not been introduced deliberately. Would we still label P. serotina an aggressive invader in these circumstances? Besides, P. serotina has not yet fully occupied its potential range in Europe, and the spread of the species is thought to be limited by dispersal (Zerbe & Wirth 2006, Verheyen et al. 2007). To develop appropriate management strategies, we should gain insight into the factors that affect the colonization rate of P. serotina in new sites. In this abstract, we compare the results of two studies on 70 years of forest development in areas with a low propagule pressure of P. serotina. The Liedekerke forest reserve (Belgium) and the Ossenbos forest reserve (the Netherlands) were particularly appropriate for our research because they have not been managed for over sixty years and P. serotina established spontaneously during the forest development. Based on the observed patterns of P. serotina colonization in these forests, we wanted to answer the following questions: which factors influenced the spread of P. serotina, and did P. serotina act as an invasive species in the studied forests? Materials & Methods A detailed description of the materials and methods can be found in Vanhellemont et al. (2009) and Vanhellemont et al. (in press) for the studies in the Liedekerke forest reserve and the Ossenbos forest reserve, respectively. Table 1 shows the main characteristics of the studied forest reserves. For the two forest reserves, we reconstructed the P. serotina invasion based on cadastral maps and aerial photographs, tree ring analysis, forest inventories and regeneration data. 59
- Page 14 and 15: 8 variables, hydro-morphological ch
- Page 16 and 17: 10 References Bollache, L., Devin,
- Page 18 and 19: 12 Figure 1 - USDA hardiness zones
- Page 20 and 21: 14 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 # of bl
- Page 22 and 23: 16 Appendix - List of non-native sp
- Page 25 and 26: Impact of Fallopia spp. on ecosyste
- Page 27 and 28: thermophilous grassland species. Ba
- Page 29 and 30: Soil-dependent growth strategy of i
- Page 31 and 32: Nr. of flowers/plant 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.
- Page 33 and 34: Detection of intraguild predation b
- Page 35 and 36: Adaline (µg) ± S.E. 2.50 2.00 1.5
- Page 37 and 38: Measuring the impact of Harmonia ax
- Page 39 and 40: Unidentified (9/20) Propylea 14-pun
- Page 41 and 42: Comparing Fallopia japonica, F. sac
- Page 43 and 44: SLA (m²/kg) 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 SLA
- Page 45 and 46: Mediterranean container plants and
- Page 47 and 48: All species from our survey have in
- Page 49 and 50: dangers of uncritically using the t
- Page 51 and 52: Water frogs in Wallonia: genetic id
- Page 53 and 54: • the distinction between the nat
- Page 55: References Berger, L., 1988. On the
- Page 58 and 59: 52 # crabs fyke -1 day -1 150 100 5
- Page 60 and 61: 54 Ring-necked parakeets in Belgium
- Page 62 and 63: 56 Our models predict a mean number
- Page 66 and 67: 60 Study area & data collection Lie
- Page 68 and 69: 62 cm) and age of the tree and comp
- Page 71 and 72: Soil arthropods associated to the i
- Page 73 and 74: Table 1. Abundance of soil fauna ex
- Page 75: References Armbrecht I., Perfecto I
- Page 78 and 79: 72 Status of non-indigenous fish sp
- Page 80 and 81: 74 Trends At 487 site-specific surv
- Page 83 and 84: Non-indigenous species of the Belgi
- Page 85 and 86: 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 cumulative #
- Page 87 and 88: Brussels Psittacidae: impacts, risk
- Page 89: References Anonymous 2005. UK non-n
- Page 92 and 93: 86 country, by calculating the numb
- Page 94 and 95: 88 raised awareness on the importan
- Page 96 and 97: 90 Table 1 - Presentation of the di
- Page 99: Science Facing Aliens Proceedings o
Patterns of Prunus serot<strong>in</strong>a <strong>in</strong>vasion <strong>in</strong> two contrast<strong>in</strong>g forests<br />
Margot VANHELLEMONT 1 , Lander BAETEN 1 , Mart<strong>in</strong> HERMY 2 & Kris VERHEYEN 1<br />
1<br />
Laboratory of Forestry, Ghent University, Geraardsbergsesteenweg 267, B-9090 Gontrode,<br />
<strong>Belgium</strong><br />
2<br />
Division Forest, Nature and Landscape, K.U.Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200e, B-3001 Leuven,<br />
<strong>Belgium</strong><br />
Introduction<br />
Prunus serot<strong>in</strong>a Ehrh., a North-American tree species, is considered an <strong>in</strong>vasive species <strong>in</strong><br />
Western Europe. Most studies <strong>in</strong> its <strong>in</strong>troduced range focused on areas heavily <strong>in</strong>vaded by P.<br />
serot<strong>in</strong>a. Nonetheless, the presence and abundance of P. serot<strong>in</strong>a <strong>in</strong> these areas still reflects<br />
the massive plant<strong>in</strong>gs of the past (Starf<strong>in</strong>ger et al. 2003). The large-scale plant<strong>in</strong>gs resulted <strong>in</strong><br />
a high propagule pressure of P. serot<strong>in</strong>a. Consequently, P. serot<strong>in</strong>a exhibited a considerable<br />
<strong>in</strong>vasion rate <strong>in</strong> these areas, which lead to problems <strong>in</strong> silviculture and nature conservation<br />
(Starf<strong>in</strong>ger et al. 2003). S<strong>in</strong>ce actual rates of <strong>in</strong>vasion appear to be largely determ<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />
propagule pressure (Von Holle & Simberloff 2005), we wanted to study the spread of P.<br />
serot<strong>in</strong>a <strong>in</strong> an area characterized by a far lower propagule pressure where the species has not<br />
been <strong>in</strong>troduced deliberately. Would we still label P. serot<strong>in</strong>a an aggressive <strong>in</strong>vader <strong>in</strong> these<br />
circumstances? Besides, P. serot<strong>in</strong>a has not yet fully occupied its potential range <strong>in</strong> Europe,<br />
and the spread of the species is thought to be limited by dispersal (Zerbe & Wirth 2006,<br />
Verheyen et al. 2007). To develop appropriate management strategies, we should ga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>sight<br />
<strong>in</strong>to the factors that affect the colonization rate of P. serot<strong>in</strong>a <strong>in</strong> new sites.<br />
In this abstract, we compare the results of two studies on 70 years of forest<br />
development <strong>in</strong> areas with a low propagule pressure of P. serot<strong>in</strong>a. The Liedekerke forest<br />
reserve (<strong>Belgium</strong>) and the Ossenbos forest reserve (the Netherlands) were particularly<br />
appropriate for our research because they have not been managed for over sixty years and P.<br />
serot<strong>in</strong>a established spontaneously dur<strong>in</strong>g the forest development. Based on the observed<br />
patterns of P. serot<strong>in</strong>a colonization <strong>in</strong> these forests, we wanted to answer the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
questions: which factors <strong>in</strong>fluenced the spread of P. serot<strong>in</strong>a, and did P. serot<strong>in</strong>a act as an<br />
<strong>in</strong>vasive species <strong>in</strong> the studied forests?<br />
Materials & Methods<br />
A detailed description of the materials and methods can be found <strong>in</strong> Vanhellemont et al.<br />
(2009) and Vanhellemont et al. (<strong>in</strong> press) for the studies <strong>in</strong> the Liedekerke forest reserve and<br />
the Ossenbos forest reserve, respectively. Table 1 shows the ma<strong>in</strong> characteristics of the<br />
studied forest reserves. For the two forest reserves, we reconstructed the P. serot<strong>in</strong>a <strong>in</strong>vasion<br />
based on cadastral maps and aerial photographs, tree r<strong>in</strong>g analysis, forest <strong>in</strong>ventories and<br />
regeneration data.<br />
59