Many e<strong>of</strong>ian s<strong>and</strong>stones have one or more margins that were removed by <strong>late</strong>r erosion or are covered by younger strata <strong>and</strong> no subsurface data is available. This is most common along <strong>the</strong> west- ern <strong>and</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn margins <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> region <strong>of</strong> study. Late <strong>Paleozoic</strong> <strong>eolian</strong> <strong>deposits</strong> Introduction The <strong>late</strong> <strong>Paleozoic</strong> <strong>eolian</strong> s<strong>and</strong>stones range in age from Atokan to <strong>late</strong> Leonardian <strong>and</strong> possibly Guadalupian (Fig. 2). They are divided here into five erg-bearing sequences: Pennsylvanian, Wolf- campian, Leonardian I, Leonardian II <strong>and</strong> Leonardian III. Each sequence is interca<strong>late</strong>d with or bracketed by fossil-bearing rocks. Penn- sylvanian <strong>eolian</strong> <strong>deposits</strong> are primarily distributed north <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ancestral Rockies, whereas Permian ergs are extensively distributed to <strong>the</strong> southwest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se major barriers. Figure 4 shows <strong>the</strong> distribu- tion <strong>of</strong> <strong>late</strong> <strong>Paleozoic</strong> tectonic elements that af- fected Pennsylvanian <strong>and</strong> Permian deposition. Pennsylvanian <strong>eolian</strong> <strong>deposits</strong> Pennsylvanian <strong>eolian</strong> deposition is widespread <strong>and</strong> has been documented from <strong>the</strong> lower Casper Formation (Steidtmann, 1974), lower Tensleep S<strong>and</strong>stone (Mankiewicz <strong>and</strong> Steidtmann, 1979; Kerr, this volume) <strong>and</strong> Quadrant S<strong>and</strong>stone (Saperstone <strong>and</strong> Ethridge, 1984) in Wyoming <strong>and</strong> adjacent Montana <strong>and</strong> Colorado, in <strong>the</strong> lower Weber S<strong>and</strong>stone <strong>of</strong> Utah, Wyoming <strong>and</strong> Col- orado (Bissell <strong>and</strong> Childs, 1958; Driese <strong>and</strong> Dott, 1984), <strong>and</strong> from <strong>the</strong> Honaker Trail Formation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Hermosa Group <strong>of</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>astern Utah (Loope, 1984). In addition, <strong>eolian</strong> s<strong>and</strong>stone is present in <strong>the</strong> Manakacha <strong>and</strong> Wescogame Formations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Supai Group in nor<strong>the</strong>rn Arizona but has yet to be documented in <strong>the</strong> literature. The Pennsyl- vanian age <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> above is well docu- mented by interca<strong>late</strong>d fossil-beating marine rocks. Figure 5 <strong>and</strong> Table 2 present <strong>the</strong> data base for Pennsylvanian <strong>and</strong> Permian <strong>eolian</strong> <strong>deposits</strong>. The Pennsylvanian <strong>deposits</strong>, although almost certainly a series <strong>of</strong> separate ergs ranging from Atokan to Virgilian in age, are herein isopached on a single map. Eolian-bearing units consist <strong>of</strong> several stratigraphic units across Wyoming, south- ern Montana, nor<strong>the</strong>rn Utah <strong>and</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn Col- orado (Fig. 6). The lack <strong>of</strong> detailed stratigraphic <strong>and</strong> sedimentologic data prevent fur<strong>the</strong>r subdivi- sion. The <strong>eolian</strong> <strong>deposits</strong> in sou<strong>the</strong>astern Utah <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gr<strong>and</strong> Canyon region do not have sufficient data available to construct isopachs; only <strong>the</strong>ir known <strong>and</strong> inferred <strong>late</strong>ral distribution are shown. For simplicity, <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn s<strong>and</strong> body will be referred to as <strong>the</strong> Tensleep complex <strong>and</strong> it also includes part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Weber, Quadrant <strong>and</strong> Casper stratigraphic units. The Tensleep forms a broad sheet across <strong>the</strong> Central <strong>and</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Rocky Mountain region that generally ranges to 100 m thick but <strong>the</strong> erg-bearing interval locally exceeds 300 m in nor<strong>the</strong>rn Utah <strong>and</strong> 500 m in southwest- ern Montana (Bissell <strong>and</strong> Childs, 1958; Mallory, 1967; Saperstone <strong>and</strong> Ethridge, 1984). Figure 7A, B <strong>and</strong> C shows <strong>the</strong> Tensleep <strong>and</strong> re<strong>late</strong>d units in cross-section. Although <strong>the</strong> unit is renowned for exposures <strong>of</strong> large-scale, high-angle s<strong>and</strong>-flow strata that dip to <strong>the</strong> south <strong>and</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>ast (Steidt- mann, 1974; Mankiewicz <strong>and</strong> Steidtmann, 1979), detailed sedimentologic studies have documented a broad variety <strong>of</strong> <strong>eolian</strong> stratification styles in- cluding small-scale trough <strong>and</strong> planar-tabular wind-ripple cross strata, horizontal to gently in- clined wind-ripple strata, <strong>and</strong> wet <strong>and</strong> dry inter- dune <strong>deposits</strong> (Mankiewicz <strong>and</strong> Steidtmann, 1979; Driese <strong>and</strong> Dott, 1984; Saperstone <strong>and</strong> Ethridge, 1984; Kerr, this volume; J. Haslett, pets. commun., 1986). In addition, each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> above authors have noted interbedding <strong>of</strong> <strong>eolian</strong> <strong>and</strong> marine-sabkha strata within <strong>the</strong> Tensleep S<strong>and</strong>stone, especially near erg-deposit margins. The Tensleep complex is a north-northwest- trending s<strong>and</strong>stone body (Fig. 6) bordered by marine clastic <strong>and</strong> carbonate rocks to <strong>the</strong> west (Oquirrh <strong>and</strong> Wood River Groups <strong>and</strong> re<strong>late</strong>d rocks), marine carbonate to <strong>the</strong> east (lower Min- nelusa Formation <strong>and</strong> re<strong>late</strong>d rocks), <strong>and</strong> fluvial clastic rocks to <strong>the</strong> south (Maroon Formation <strong>and</strong> Fountain Arkose; Maughan <strong>and</strong> Wilson, 1960). Little is known about <strong>the</strong> erg margins to <strong>the</strong> north, although Stewart <strong>and</strong> Walker (1980) reported Pen- nsylvanian <strong>eolian</strong> <strong>deposits</strong> in <strong>the</strong> Rockies <strong>of</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn Canada.
A A' MCNTANA WYOMING I BIGHORN POWDER EAS T- CENTRAL MTNS RIVER B*4SIN WYOMING I IMINNELUSA FM I PARK CITY F:M Lower Ten'slee¢' SS U'pper ]" .... 'ep SS' ~ I:;ERMI;~N REDBEDS~ - " ........ ;"':~"'":'":";:"::
- Page 1 and 2: Sedimentary Geology, 56 (1988) 3-12
- Page 3 and 4: method of presentation because of t
- Page 5: The presentation of each eolian-bea
- Page 9 and 10: 46 ° 41 o 36' 31 ° 117 ° 112 °
- Page 11: 46 ° ;I , 41 ° 117 ° 112 ° ~ '
- Page 15: 117 ° 112 ° #-v~ ~ + / .~.,
- Page 18 and 19: 46 ° 41 ° 36 ° 31 c 117 ! ° 112
- Page 21 and 22: pp. 23-26 46 ° 41 o 36 ° 31 ° 11
- Page 23: - 4' 117 ° 112 ° 107 ° 102 ° '
- Page 26 and 27: 28 east into the Central Colorado t
- Page 28 and 29: 30 Blakey (1986) documented the pre
- Page 30 and 31: 32 A WYOMING : COLOR, DO A I SOUTH'
- Page 32 and 33: 34 the southern Monument Uplift and
- Page 34 and 35: , 117 ° 112 ° 107 ° 102 ° 40o~
- Page 37 and 38: pp. 39-42 46 ° 41 ° 36 ~ 31 c -v_
- Page 39: 117 ° 112 ° 107 ° 102 ° ' ¢ '
- Page 42 and 43: G (B) SOURCES OF DATA FOR MIDDLE JU
- Page 45 and 46: pp. 47"50 46 ° 41 `= 36 c -=-=.=.
- Page 47: 117 ° 112 ° 107 ° 102 ° ! l I
- Page 50 and 51: 52 C) A ID.~HO I WYOMING NORTHERN W
- Page 52 and 53: 54 during the Jurassic Period (Pete
- Page 54 and 55: 56 called the "Reservation facies".
- Page 56 and 57:
58 A A' WYINE NEICO WIND RIVER LARA
- Page 58 and 59:
60 F F' SS AT MESITA Recopture Mbr
- Page 60 and 61:
62 member is unconformably overlain
- Page 62 and 63:
64 B UTAH [ ARIZONA LAKE POWELL " I
- Page 64 and 65:
66 misleading. The eolian beds are
- Page 66 and 67:
117 ° 112 ° 107 ° 102 ° ' ¢ '
- Page 69 and 70:
pp. 71-74 46 ° 41 ° 36 ° 31'= 11
- Page 71:
~o ~o o o o I I | I + O I I I -----
- Page 74 and 75:
76 the logs so the contour lines ar
- Page 76 and 77:
78 TABLE 1 Methodology used in cons
- Page 78 and 79:
80 TABLE 2 (continued) Section Auth
- Page 80 and 81:
82 TABLE 2 (continued) Section Auth
- Page 82 and 83:
84 TABLE 2 (continued) Section Auth
- Page 84 and 85:
86 TABLE 2 (continued) Section Auth
- Page 86 and 87:
88 TABLE 4 Data base for Wingate Sa
- Page 88 and 89:
90 TABLE 4 (continued) Section Auth
- Page 90 and 91:
92 TABLE 5 (continued) Section Auth
- Page 92 and 93:
94 TABLE 5 (continued) Section Auth
- Page 94 and 95:
96 TABLE 5 (continued) Section Auth
- Page 96 and 97:
98 TABLE 6 (continued) Section Auth
- Page 98 and 99:
100 TABLE 6 (continued) Section Aut
- Page 100 and 101:
102 TABLE 6 (continued) Section Aut
- Page 102 and 103:
104 TABLE 7 (continued) Section Aut
- Page 104 and 105:
106 TABLE 7 (continued) Section Aut
- Page 106 and 107:
108 TABLE 7 (continued) Section Aut
- Page 108 and 109:
110 TABLE 7 (continued) Section Aut
- Page 110 and 111:
112 TABLE 7 (continued) Section Aut
- Page 112 and 113:
114 TABLE 7 (continued) Section Aut
- Page 114 and 115:
116 TABLE 7 (continued) Section Aut
- Page 116 and 117:
118 Deposits of the Western Interio
- Page 118 and 119:
120 Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah.
- Page 120 and 121:
122 O'Sullivan, R.B., 1984. Stratig
- Page 122 and 123:
124 Thaden, R.E., Thrites, A.F. and