30.01.2013 Views

Synthesis of late Paleozoic and Mesozoic eolian deposits of the ...

Synthesis of late Paleozoic and Mesozoic eolian deposits of the ...

Synthesis of late Paleozoic and Mesozoic eolian deposits of the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

62<br />

member is unconformably overlain by marine de-<br />

posits <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Curtis or SummerviUe Formations or<br />

<strong>the</strong> Romana S<strong>and</strong>stone, <strong>and</strong> may be at least equiv-<br />

alent to <strong>the</strong> upper part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> middle member <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Entrada S<strong>and</strong>stone elsewhere. The upper<br />

member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Entrada S<strong>and</strong>stone largely oc-<br />

cupies <strong>the</strong> Circle Cliffs basin or trough, with an<br />

isopach pattern similar to that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> underlying<br />

lower <strong>and</strong> middle members. Lateral relationships<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> upper member are poorly understood,<br />

largely because much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> unit was removed<br />

prior to deposition <strong>of</strong> overlying rocks but also<br />

because many critical areas are concealed or were<br />

removed by erosion (Fig. 28).<br />

The Cow Springs Member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Entrada has<br />

been recognized as a distinct unit within <strong>the</strong> En-<br />

trada (Peterson, in press). The unit retains forma-<br />

tion status in <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn San Juan basin pending<br />

additional studies. As seen in Fig. 29E, <strong>the</strong> Cow<br />

Springs forms a northwest-sou<strong>the</strong>ast elongate<br />

body. Progressing northwestward <strong>the</strong> member ap-<br />

parently grades into <strong>the</strong> upper part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> middle<br />

member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Entrada S<strong>and</strong>stone in north-central<br />

Arizona. The nor<strong>the</strong>astern boundary <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Cow<br />

Springs is a facies change primarily into silty<br />

mudstones <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Wanakah Formation. The Cow<br />

Springs is broadly interpreted as a <strong>late</strong>r-phase erg<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Entrada S<strong>and</strong>stone that existed inl<strong>and</strong> from<br />

sabkha or restricted marine <strong>deposits</strong> represented<br />

by <strong>the</strong> Wanakah Formation or middle member <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Entrada. Its distribution may partly reflect <strong>the</strong><br />

nature <strong>of</strong> preservation beneath <strong>the</strong> J-5 uncon-<br />

formity. Facies patterns within <strong>the</strong> Cow Springs<br />

show a clear nor<strong>the</strong>astward decrease in <strong>the</strong> per-<br />

centage <strong>of</strong> cross-stratified s<strong>and</strong>stone toward facies<br />

change into <strong>the</strong> Wanakah Formation.<br />

The s<strong>and</strong>stone at Mesita (Condon, 1985a, b;<br />

Condon <strong>and</strong> Peterson, 1986) is a predominantly<br />

<strong>eolian</strong> unit in <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>astern San Juan basin <strong>of</strong><br />

northwestern New Mexico that was formerly as-<br />

signed to <strong>the</strong> Bluff S<strong>and</strong>stone (Rapaport et al.,<br />

1952) or to <strong>the</strong> Bluff <strong>and</strong> Zuni S<strong>and</strong>stones<br />

(Maxwell, 1976, 1982). The Mesita is divided into<br />

lower <strong>and</strong> upper parts (Condon, 1985a, b) that we<br />

here tentatively corre<strong>late</strong> with <strong>the</strong> Cow Springs<br />

S<strong>and</strong>stone <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Recapture Member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Morrison Formation, respectively; this relation is<br />

reflected in <strong>the</strong> isopach map (Fig. 28).<br />

Middle Jurassic V<br />

Following O'Sullivan (1980a, b, 1981a, b) <strong>and</strong><br />

O'Sullivan <strong>and</strong> Pierce (1983), <strong>the</strong> Moab Tongue <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Entrada S<strong>and</strong>stone is distinguished by bedding<br />

style from <strong>the</strong> underlying <strong>and</strong> <strong>late</strong>rally adjacent<br />

Slick Rock Member. The Moab Tongue consists<br />

<strong>of</strong> one to a few large sets <strong>of</strong> cross-strata, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Slick Rock Member consists <strong>of</strong> interbedded thin<br />

sets <strong>of</strong> cross-strata <strong>and</strong> silty, red, flat-bedded units.<br />

Using this criterion, <strong>the</strong> Moab Tongue is restricted<br />

to a fairly small part <strong>of</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>astern Utah. Earlier,<br />

Wright et al. (1962) used different, but now con-<br />

sidered unreliable, criteria to trace <strong>the</strong> Moab<br />

Tongue into southwestern Colorado.<br />

The Moab Tongue reaches a maximum thick-<br />

ness <strong>of</strong> about 34 m along <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>ast side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Monument uplift (Fig. 30). To <strong>the</strong> northwest, <strong>the</strong><br />

tongue is replaced <strong>late</strong>rally by red beds in <strong>the</strong><br />

lower part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lower Summerville Formation <strong>of</strong><br />

McKnight (1940), now <strong>the</strong> Curtis Formation (Fig.<br />

29C). Here <strong>the</strong> Moab Tongue is overlain by <strong>the</strong><br />

restricted marine Summerville Formation, <strong>and</strong><br />

separated from <strong>the</strong> Slick Rock Member by <strong>the</strong><br />

lowermost lower Summerville Formation <strong>of</strong> Mc-<br />

Knight (1940). This lower tongue <strong>of</strong> Summerville<br />

pinches out eastward so that <strong>the</strong> Moab Tongue<br />

directly overlies <strong>the</strong> Slick Rock Member.<br />

Sou<strong>the</strong>astward, most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Summerville that lies<br />

above <strong>the</strong> Moab is truncated by <strong>the</strong> J-5 unconfor-<br />

mity. O'Sullivan (1980b) showed that Summerville<br />

redbeds overlying <strong>the</strong> Moab are truncated east-<br />

ward by <strong>the</strong> sub-Morrison unconformity. How-<br />

ever, more recent but as yet unpublished work by<br />

R.B. O'Sullivan (pers. commun., 1986) indicates<br />

that a thin part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Summerville does continue<br />

eastward to merge with similar redbeds at <strong>the</strong> top<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Wanakah Formation in sou<strong>the</strong>astern Utah.<br />

Hence, <strong>the</strong> Moab is succeeded by restricted marine,<br />

sabkha, or tidal-flat(?) <strong>deposits</strong>.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>astern portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> outcrops, <strong>the</strong><br />

Moab Tongue grades into <strong>the</strong> Stick Rock Member<br />

(Fig. 29C). Similarly, to <strong>the</strong> south <strong>the</strong> tongue<br />

breaks into numerous cross-stratified <strong>and</strong> flat-bed-<br />

ded units included in <strong>the</strong> Stick Rock Member. At<br />

<strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn localities, a thin wedge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Wanakah Formation lies on <strong>the</strong> Moab Tongue<br />

<strong>and</strong> separates it from <strong>the</strong> overlying J-5 unconfor-<br />

mity.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!