30.01.2013 Views

Synthesis of late Paleozoic and Mesozoic eolian deposits of the ...

Synthesis of late Paleozoic and Mesozoic eolian deposits of the ...

Synthesis of late Paleozoic and Mesozoic eolian deposits of the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Page S<strong>and</strong>stone-filled depressions up to 10 m thick<br />

on <strong>the</strong> J-2 surface are composed <strong>of</strong> coarser-gained,<br />

flat to low-inclined cross-strata <strong>of</strong> wind-ripple<br />

origin (Knight, 1986). Western outcrops <strong>of</strong> Page<br />

S<strong>and</strong>stone commonly are deformed, probably <strong>the</strong><br />

result <strong>of</strong> evaporite dissolution in <strong>the</strong> underlying<br />

Carmel Formation.<br />

The Page S<strong>and</strong>stone is interpreted as a coastal<br />

erg system that paralleled <strong>the</strong> Carmel sabkha <strong>and</strong><br />

shallow marine embayment to <strong>the</strong> west; <strong>the</strong> east-<br />

ern inl<strong>and</strong> limits were largely defined by <strong>the</strong><br />

Monument bench (Fig. 20) (Peterson <strong>and</strong><br />

Pipiringos, 1979; Caputo, 1980; Blakey et al., 1983;<br />

Knight, 1986; Peterson, 1986; Kocurek <strong>and</strong><br />

Hunter, 1986). Eastward <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Page S<strong>and</strong>stone,<br />

potentially equivalent units (lower Dewey Bridge<br />

Member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Entrada S<strong>and</strong>stone, lower part <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Upper Member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Carmel Formation) are<br />

largely sabkha in origin. The Page S<strong>and</strong>stone was<br />

deposited over <strong>the</strong> irregular, eroded J-2 surface<br />

that is commonly marked by thin-granule lag de-<br />

posits <strong>and</strong> polygonal fractures (Peterson <strong>and</strong><br />

Pipiringos, 1979), <strong>the</strong> latter interpreted by Kocurek<br />

<strong>and</strong> Hunter (1986) as forming in an evaporite-en-<br />

crusted surface. Knight (1986) has interpreted <strong>the</strong><br />

coarser-grained basal <strong>deposits</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Page S<strong>and</strong>-<br />

stone that fill depressions on <strong>the</strong> J-2 surface as<br />

probably predating <strong>the</strong> Page erg system per se,<br />

<strong>and</strong> representing s<strong>and</strong> deposit over <strong>the</strong> J-2 surface<br />

in an overall s<strong>and</strong>-undersaturated environment in<br />

which deposition occurred only in depressions.<br />

Middle Jurassic 111, IV, V <strong>eolian</strong> <strong>deposits</strong><br />

Introduction<br />

The Middle Jurassic (Bathonian-Callovian)<br />

Entrada S<strong>and</strong>stone system <strong>and</strong> directly equivalent<br />

units (Fig. 2) form perhaps <strong>the</strong> most complex<br />

<strong>eolian</strong> system in <strong>the</strong> western United States, <strong>and</strong><br />

are present in nine states extending from Utah to<br />

<strong>the</strong> Texas <strong>and</strong> Oklahoma panh<strong>and</strong>les, <strong>and</strong> from<br />

Arizona <strong>and</strong> New Mexico to <strong>the</strong> Black Hills <strong>of</strong><br />

South Dakota. This erg system, composed <strong>of</strong><br />

numerous units, is illustrated here as three units<br />

on three maps. Our three units do not necessarily<br />

coincide with previous subdivisions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Entrada<br />

as explained below. Because <strong>of</strong> stratigraphic com-<br />

plexities <strong>and</strong> uncertainties <strong>and</strong> despite our at-<br />

tempts to not do so, part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> three intervals<br />

possibly overlap in time <strong>and</strong> all are likely strongly<br />

diachronous.<br />

Figure 27 shows <strong>the</strong> most extensive <strong>and</strong> oldest<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Entrada system consisting <strong>of</strong>: lower<br />

<strong>and</strong> middle members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Entrada S<strong>and</strong>stone in<br />

west-central Utah; Entrada S<strong>and</strong>stone <strong>of</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

Utah, nor<strong>the</strong>rn Arizona, southwestern <strong>and</strong> south-<br />

eastern Colorado, <strong>and</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn Utah; Slick Rock<br />

Member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Entrada S<strong>and</strong>stone in east-central<br />

Utah <strong>and</strong> west-central Colorado; Canyon Springs<br />

Member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sundance Formation in Wyoming,<br />

South Dakota, <strong>and</strong> northwestern Colorado;<br />

Iyanbito, medial silty <strong>and</strong> upper s<strong>and</strong>y members<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Entrada S<strong>and</strong>stone in northwestern New<br />

Mexico; <strong>and</strong> Entrada S<strong>and</strong>stone <strong>and</strong> Exeter Mem-<br />

ber <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Entrada S<strong>and</strong>stone in east-central <strong>and</strong><br />

eastern New Mexico, Texas, <strong>and</strong> Oklahoma. The<br />

Dewey Bridge Member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Entrada S<strong>and</strong>stone<br />

in east-central Utah is not included on Fig. 27<br />

because this unit generally lacks <strong>eolian</strong> <strong>deposits</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> because it corre<strong>late</strong>s with <strong>the</strong> older Carmel<br />

Formation (see Page S<strong>and</strong>stone discussion).<br />

Figure 28 shows <strong>the</strong> Upper Member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Entrada S<strong>and</strong>stone <strong>of</strong> west-central Utah, <strong>the</strong> pos-<br />

sibly somewhat older Cow Springs Member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Entrada S<strong>and</strong>stone in nor<strong>the</strong>astern Arizona <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Cow Springs Member <strong>and</strong> overlying lower<br />

part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> s<strong>and</strong>stone at Mesita in New Mexico. It<br />

should be noted that <strong>the</strong> Exeter Member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Entrada S<strong>and</strong>stone (included in Fig. 27) in north-<br />

eastern New Mexico may be time-equivalent to<br />

<strong>the</strong> Cow Springs member (Lucas et al., 1985).<br />

Restored cross-sections are shown on Fig. 29 <strong>and</strong><br />

Table 7 lists Entrada S<strong>and</strong>stone data points. Fig-<br />

ure 30 shows what may be <strong>the</strong> youngest part <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Entrada erg systems, <strong>the</strong> Moab Tongue <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Entrada S<strong>and</strong>stone in east-central Utah.<br />

Middle Jurassic 111<br />

Overall, <strong>the</strong> Entrada S<strong>and</strong>stone conformably<br />

overlies <strong>the</strong> Carmel Formation. Progressing east-<br />

ward to <strong>the</strong> pinch-out <strong>of</strong> that unit, <strong>the</strong> Entrada<br />

S<strong>and</strong>stone rests directly on <strong>the</strong> J-2 unconformity<br />

that is underlain by progressively older rocks to<br />

<strong>the</strong> east.<br />

Across Wyoming <strong>the</strong> Canyon Springs Member<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sundance Formation rests on <strong>the</strong> J-2 surface<br />

57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!