grb absorption spectroscopy - Inaf
grb absorption spectroscopy - Inaf
grb absorption spectroscopy - Inaf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Absorption studies of GRB afterglows<br />
with high resolution <strong>spectroscopy</strong><br />
Napoli, III Congresso Nazionale GRB<br />
Valerio D’Elia<br />
(ASI/ASDC & INAF/OAR)<br />
21 Settembre 2012
OUTLINE<br />
• What can we learn from GRB <strong>absorption</strong> <strong>spectroscopy</strong><br />
• The need for high resolution spectra<br />
• Absorption features in high resolution<br />
• X-shooter’s results: GRB090926A and GRB120327A<br />
• Conclusions and perspectives
Suitable to:<br />
GRB ABSORPTION SPECTROSCOPY<br />
• Find redshifts and build the GRB luminosity function<br />
• Estimate the metal content in high redshift galaxies<br />
• Characterize the circumburst environment<br />
• Explore the interaction between the GRB and the surrounding<br />
medium<br />
• Study the intervening absorbers along GRB sightlines
LOW – RES GRBs<br />
GRBs represent a new tool to study high-z galaxies<br />
The ISM gives us precious information on the metal enrichment history of the<br />
galaxies, which in turn is linked to the mass function evolution.<br />
In the past, metal enrichment in galaxies at high z has been studied using:<br />
• Lyman Break Galaxies<br />
• Galaxies along the line of sight of quasars (Damped Lyman-α systems)<br />
The first class cannot be representative of the true galaxy population<br />
The second one is entangled by selection effects: the radiation from the<br />
QSOs probes preferentially the halos of the galaxies.
LOW – RES GRBs<br />
GRBs provide an independent way of studing the metal enrichment of<br />
galaxies at z > 1.<br />
Advantages:<br />
• Probing central galaxy regions<br />
• No luminosity bias<br />
• ISM can be studied up to higher<br />
redshift than DLA systems.<br />
GRB-DLAs appear to be more<br />
metal rich than QSO-DLAs<br />
(Savaglio 2005 and 2010;<br />
Prochaska et al. 2007)<br />
Savaglio 2010
HIGH RESOLUTION SPECTROSCOPY<br />
Advantages of hi-res <strong>spectroscopy</strong>:<br />
• Separates the GRB surrounding medium in components,<br />
allowing a more accurate study of the composition, density,<br />
cinematics and physics of the absorbing gas.<br />
• Is necessary to disentangle the ISM from the <strong>absorption</strong><br />
coming from the GRB surroundings.<br />
• Is our only tool to fully explore the wealth of information<br />
carried by the lines absorbed by the excited (in particular fine<br />
structure) levels.<br />
Disadvantages<br />
• Suitable for high luminous afterglows only<br />
• A fast reaction to the trigger is needed<br />
Now achievable thanks to Swift and RRM
Advantages:<br />
Piranomonte<br />
et al. 2008<br />
HIGH RESOLUTION SPECTROSCOPY<br />
2) 1) disentangles Separates the the GRB ISM surrounding and the <strong>absorption</strong> medium coming in components, from the allowing GRB surroundings a more<br />
accurate study of the composition, density, kinematics and physics of the<br />
absorbing gas.<br />
GRB 050922C<br />
GRB 021004<br />
Fiore et al. 2005<br />
FORS, R=1000 UVES, R=40000
Average [C/Fe] ratio is<br />
0.08±0.24, consistent with<br />
values predicted for a<br />
galaxy younger than 1 Gyr<br />
undergoing star formation<br />
[C/Fe] of component 3 is<br />
0.53±0.23, larger than in 2<br />
(-0.15±0.13), with [C]<br />
roughly constant.<br />
GRB 050730<br />
Since Fe dust grains are more efficiently destroyed than C dust grains by<br />
the GRB UV flux and blast wave (Perna, Lazzati & Fiore 2003), this<br />
suggests that component 2 is closer to the GRB than component 3.
FINE STRUCTURE FEATURES<br />
The gross structure of an atom is due to the principal quantum number<br />
n, giving the main electron shells of atoms. However, electron shells<br />
exhibit fine structure, and levels are split due to spin-orbit<br />
coupling (the<br />
energy difference<br />
between the<br />
electron spin<br />
being parallel or<br />
antiparallel to<br />
the electron's orbital<br />
moment).<br />
First fine structure<br />
excited level<br />
Fine structure splitting
FINE STRUCTURE FEATURES<br />
How to populate fine structure excited levels:<br />
1. Collisional processes:<br />
2. Radiative processes:<br />
Incident UV<br />
radiation<br />
Incoming<br />
e -<br />
2a. Indirect UV pumping<br />
Photoexcitation<br />
n + 1<br />
Radiative<br />
de-excitation<br />
n<br />
J=3/2<br />
J=1/2<br />
Incident IR<br />
radiation<br />
(Si II, C II) (Fe II)<br />
n<br />
(O I)<br />
2b. Direct IR pumping<br />
STRONG VARIABILITY EXPECTED!<br />
J=2<br />
J=1<br />
J=0<br />
Selection<br />
rule: ΔJ=0,±1<br />
n<br />
J=1/2<br />
J=3/2<br />
J=5/2<br />
J=7/2<br />
J=9/2
GRB 060418: VARIABILITY<br />
Fine structure variability: hint of UV pumping…<br />
Vreeswijk et<br />
al. 2007
High ionization lines such as<br />
NV could be produced by<br />
the GRB UV flux<br />
SIV is far from the explosion<br />
site in GRB050730<br />
Fox et al. 2008<br />
HIGH IONIZATION LINES<br />
(Prochaska et al. 2008)<br />
If this is the case, the NV<br />
should be close to the GRB<br />
(10pc)<br />
d (SIV) > 130 pc<br />
Multi-epoch spectra of a z>2 GRB is needed to search for NV variability<br />
Variation not observed in GRB080310 (De Cia et al. 2012)
CrII groud state<br />
line is decreasing<br />
in GRB 080310<br />
log N epII (Cr II) =<br />
13.07 ± 0.06<br />
log N epIV (Cr II) =<br />
12.37 ± 0.14<br />
(De Cia et al. 2012)<br />
PHOTOIONIZATION IN ACTION
A NEW INSTRUMENT @ THE VLT: X-SHOOTER<br />
High efficiency spectrograph at the UT2 Cassegrain focus<br />
Intermediate resolution (R = 4000-14000)<br />
Wide spectral coverage (3000-25000Å)<br />
Three arms splitting: UVB, VIS, NIR<br />
First light: Nov 2008<br />
In operation: Oct 2009<br />
Suitable to:<br />
• spot GRBs up to z ~ 20<br />
• study host metallicity in a wide redshift<br />
range<br />
• follow line variations with higher temporal<br />
resolution and longer times<br />
• collect good quality GRB spectra up to R ~<br />
21-21.5 (short GRBs)
OVI<br />
Lyβ SII<br />
NiII<br />
NV<br />
NiII<br />
Lyα<br />
OI/SiII<br />
2 - CIV<br />
SiII<br />
SiII 3 - CII CIV SiIV<br />
1 - CIV<br />
CIV<br />
FeII<br />
CaII<br />
FeII<br />
Al II<br />
FeII MgII<br />
Intervening Main absorbers System<br />
SiII<br />
MgI<br />
Al III 4 - MgII/MgI<br />
1) z=1.9466<br />
2) z=1.7986<br />
3) z=1.7483<br />
4) z=1.2456
MAIN SYSTEM GAS SEPARATION IN COMPONENTS<br />
B I ≈ 30km/s<br />
B II ≈ 90km/s<br />
Two components identified at z = 2.1071<br />
II<br />
I<br />
Si IV<br />
C IV
MAIN SYSTEM METALLICITY<br />
Ly_α<br />
Missing lines<br />
Saturation<br />
Ly_β<br />
Contamination<br />
Metallicity is in the range<br />
4.2X10 -3 -1.4X10 -2 , i.e., among the<br />
lowest in GRB hosts.<br />
N H =21.60±0.07 cm -2
GRB/ABSORBER DISTANCE<br />
Component I<br />
Component I - FeII+SiII: d=680±40 pc<br />
Component II - SiII: d ~ 1.4 kpc
CONCLUSIONS<br />
GRBs are a new tool to study the metal enrichment history of the galaxies, up to z > 5.<br />
Medium-to-high resolution, <strong>absorption</strong> <strong>spectroscopy</strong> is necessary to resolve the GRB<br />
environment in components and to separate it from the ISM, and to fully explore the<br />
information carried by the excited transitions.<br />
The ISM of the GRB hosts is complex, with many components contributing to the main<br />
system <strong>absorption</strong>.<br />
Interesting GRB surrounding medium characteristics, such as different properties of<br />
different components, high ionization lines, photoionization/photoexcitation needs<br />
medium-to high resolution in order to be properly addressed.<br />
Fine structure lines are commonly observed in GRB afterglows and are produced by<br />
UV pumping. They can give us constraints on the distance of the absorbing gas from<br />
the GRB. The prompt/afterglow emission affects the ISM up to hundreds of pc<br />
(GRB080330), or even some kpcs (GRB080319B, GRB090926A).<br />
X-shooter is is gathering exciting data on GRBs since more than 3 years.
CONCLUSIONS<br />
GRB090809/GRB100425A: Skuladottir et al. "<br />
"<br />
GRB091018A: Wiersema et al. "<br />
"<br />
GRB091127A: Vergani et al. "<br />
"<br />
GRB100219A: Thoene et al. "<br />
"<br />
GRB100316D: Bufano et al., Flores et al."<br />
"<br />
GRB100418A: de Ugarte Postigo et al. "<br />
"<br />
GRB100621A: Watson et al. "<br />
"<br />
GRB100727A: Vreeswijk et al. "<br />
"<br />
GRB100814A: Piranomonte et al. "<br />
"<br />
GRB100816A: Antonelli/Tanvir et al. "<br />
"<br />
GRB100925A: DʼAvanzo/Kaper et al."<br />
⎬⎬List of X-shooter GRB "<br />
"<br />
papers in preparation"
GRB explosion<br />
site<br />
Host gas<br />
far away<br />
Circumburst<br />
environment<br />
Intergalactic matter<br />
To<br />
Earth
Swift satellite locates<br />
GRBs with<br />
arcsec precision in a few<br />
tens of seconds<br />
HIGH RESOLUTION SPECTROSCOPY<br />
GRB<br />
Coordinate<br />
Network (GCN)<br />
releases these<br />
positions in a<br />
few seconds<br />
VLT Rapid<br />
Response<br />
Mode (RRM)<br />
allows to point<br />
such<br />
coordinates in<br />
about 8<br />
minutes
GRB 050730<br />
The main system presents 5 ( +1) components<br />
C IV: 5 components<br />
1) +32.6 2) +2.4<br />
3) -44.0 4) -90.2<br />
5) -154.6<br />
Si IV: 4 components<br />
2) +2.4 3a) -44.0 a<br />
3b) -44.0 b 4) -90.2<br />
CIV and Si IV components used as reference to fit the other ions
GRB 050730<br />
Fine structure transitions - the ion C II<br />
C II 1036 and C II 1335 doublets<br />
Only components 2 and 3 are present in the excited fine<br />
structure features
GRB 050730<br />
Fine structure transitions - the ion Si II and the atom O I<br />
Si II 1260, Si II 1304, Si II 1526 doublets and O I 1302 triplet<br />
SiII*<br />
OI*<br />
Only components 2 and 3 are present in the excited fine<br />
structure features
GRB 050730<br />
Fine structure transitions - the Fe II<br />
Fe II 1608 - 1611 multiplet<br />
Only component 2 is present in the fine structure multiplet
GRB 050730<br />
Second component: UV pumping scenario favoured<br />
G/G0 = 105 ÷ 106 where G0 = 1.6 X 10-3 erg cm-2 s-1 .<br />
Third component: possibly electron-ion collisions at work<br />
From C II fine<br />
structure doublet:<br />
10 3 < T< 10 4 K<br />
10 < n e < 60 cm -3
1) 2) 3) 5) 4) Unidentified Main Intervening system lines #1 #2 #4 #3<br />
z=0.937 z = 0.76 0.71 0.53 0.57<br />
Ni II<br />
?<br />
ABSORBING SYSTEMS<br />
?<br />
Mg I Fe Mn II II Cr II<br />
Mg II Mg I<br />
Fe II<br />
?<br />
Fe II<br />
Mg II<br />
Fe II<br />
Fe II<br />
Mg II Mg I Mg II
GRB080319B - MAIN SYSTEM: COMPONENTS<br />
Six components clearly identified
GRB080319B - MAIN SYSTEM: COMPONENTS<br />
Some lines are saturated, but we have so many transitions that<br />
the six component fit is very robust
GRB080319B - MAIN SYSTEM: COMPONENTS<br />
VI<br />
V<br />
Component I shows strong Mg II <strong>absorption</strong> but no evidence of<br />
Mg I: this is possibly the closest component to the GRB<br />
IV<br />
III<br />
II<br />
I
GRB080319B - FINE STRUCTURE LINE VARIABILITY<br />
Fine structure lines nearly<br />
disappear<br />
in less than 2 hours<br />
(less than 1h rest frame at<br />
z=0.937)!<br />
Fe II*<br />
2396<br />
Ground state lines remain<br />
constant (slight increment<br />
compatible with the<br />
decreasing of the excited<br />
levels)<br />
The strongest fine structure line variation<br />
ever found<br />
(optical depth reduced by a factor of 4 – 20)<br />
Fe II<br />
2374
FINE STRUCTURE LINE VARIABILITY<br />
Fine structure of components III and IV drops faster than that of component I<br />
Explanation:<br />
Component I experiences<br />
higher fluxes for longer<br />
times, i.e., is the closest<br />
component to the GRB.<br />
I<br />
III+IV
Balance equation:<br />
dN t<br />
u<br />
dt<br />
( )<br />
TIME DEPENDENT MODELING<br />
= N ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )<br />
l t Blu F! t $ Nu t "<br />
% Aul + BulF t #<br />
! &<br />
% ! % " % 2<br />
& t ' & $ ' & d '<br />
( ) ( ) ( )<br />
* tc + * $ c + * dL<br />
+<br />
were: F ( t) = C [ 1+<br />
z]<br />
hν<br />
Absorption<br />
#<br />
up<br />
low<br />
hν<br />
Spontaneous emission<br />
% 1<br />
up up<br />
hν<br />
low low<br />
Stimulated emission
GRB080319B - TIME DEPENDENT MODELING<br />
d = 2kpc<br />
Component I Component III<br />
d = 6kpc<br />
Possible extragalactic origin!
GRB080330 - MAIN SYSTEM: COMPONENTS<br />
Four components identified<br />
Only component IV<br />
shows up in excited<br />
levels
GRB080330 - MAIN SYSTEM: COMPONENTS<br />
Four components identified
GRB080330 - TIME DEPENDENT MODELING<br />
FeII<br />
d = 280±50 pc<br />
Component IV<br />
SiII<br />
d < 800 pc<br />
For d=280pc and<br />
n e = 1-10 3 cm -3<br />
the fraction of FeII and<br />
MgI during the first 40<br />
minutes (rest frame) of<br />
the afterglow is almost<br />
unchanged<br />
(self consistency)
INTERVENING ABSORBERS<br />
GRB Strong MgII excess - possible explanations:<br />
• Dust extintion bias<br />
• Gravitational lensing<br />
• Local, high velocity systems related to the GRBs<br />
• Different beam size of the GRB and QSO emitting regions<br />
Variability is predicted!
INTERVENING ABSORBERS<br />
GRB080319B<br />
NO VARIABILITY<br />
MgII2796 FeII2600 MgI2852<br />
1st observation<br />
2nd observation<br />
3rd observation<br />
(Variability is less than 10% at 3σ:<br />
a tighter constraint (a factor of 3) than that<br />
for GRB060206, Thöne et al.2008, Aoki et al. 2008)
FINE STRUCTURE AND EXCITED LINES<br />
Identified:<br />
- CII, SiII, FeII and OI fine structure transitions<br />
- FeII and NiII excited features
THE GRB090926A SIGHTLINE<br />
Four, very weak intervening absorbers identified at 1.24