Untitled - Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de l'Observatoire de Grenoble
Untitled - Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de l'Observatoire de Grenoble
Untitled - Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de l'Observatoire de Grenoble
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Figure 15.3: The spectrum of cosmic rays at a relativistic shock. This spectrum appears as the envelope of<br />
Fermi cycles (i.e. cosmic rays of large mean free path cross the shock front back and forth several times and gain<br />
energy at each crossing cycle downstream-upstream-downstream), the first corresponding to an amplification of<br />
the cosmic ray energy from its initial value ɛ0 by a factor Γ 2 , and the subsequent ones to an amplification by a<br />
factor 2.<br />
Because we crucially need to know them in the strong turbulence regime, especially in relation with the new<br />
investigations concerning the Ultra-High-Energy Cosmic Rays, we have un<strong>de</strong>rgone a systematical study of the<br />
transport, by combining theoretical and semi-analytical approaches with Monte-Carlo numerical simulations<br />
(Casse, Lemoine & Pelletier 2002). We have generalized the result of weak turbulence for the pitch angle diffusion<br />
and for the spatial diffusion along the magnetic field, as a function of the characteristics of the turbulence<br />
spectrum and the particle rigidity. But, as for the transverse diffusion with respect to the mean field, the<br />
behavior is <strong>de</strong>eply different and controlled by the chaotic aspect of the field lines. Furthermore, the diffusion<br />
at Larmor radii larger than the coherence length of the magnetic field does not stop sud<strong>de</strong>nly, the diffusion<br />
coefficient increases proportionally to the square of the particle energy.<br />
Fermi acceleration in relativistic regime with magnetic fronts and shocks.<br />
The enigma of the existence of Ultra High Energy Cosmic rays can be solved along two different but not<br />
exclusive ways : either by a ”bottom up” scenario where the UHECRs are generated by an acceleration process<br />
in the high energy astrophysical sources, or by a ”top down” scenario where some quantum objects, proposed by<br />
a new physics beyond the standard mo<strong>de</strong>l of particle physics, <strong>de</strong>cay and produce particles in this energy range.<br />
The Pierre Auger Observatory will soon provi<strong>de</strong> a crucial answer to this question. In<strong>de</strong>ed we will soon know<br />
whether there exists a particle spectrum beyond the ”GZK limit” (which is the energy threshold beyond which<br />
protons loose energy by producing mesons through collisions with the CMB-photons), revealing a generation of<br />
Cosmic Rays that would not come from extragalactic sources. We have contributed to the ”bottom up” scenario<br />
by studying the relativistic regime of Fermi acceleration, necessary for the Cosmic Rays to reach energies of<br />
or<strong>de</strong>r 10 20 eV in the consi<strong>de</strong>red sources (AGNs and Gamma-Ray Bursts or GRBs). We have <strong>de</strong>veloped the<br />
Fermi acceleration in relativistic regime along two different ways : with relativistic fronts and with relativistic<br />
shocks. When an ensemble of magnetic relativistic fronts propagate with relative speeds that are mildly relativistic,<br />
like in GRBs, the elastic scattering of magnetic fronts generates an efficient Fermi acceleration that<br />
we applied to GRBs (see next paragraph). As for the case of a relativistic shock, Martin Lemoine and G.P.<br />
have <strong>de</strong>veloped a combined theoretical and numerical study. The formation of the energy spectrum has been<br />
analyzed confirming a recent analysis proposed by Achterberg and Gallant (1999, MNRAS, 305, L6) and the<br />
time scales of the process have been <strong>de</strong>termined. Reliable laws for the generation of Cosmic Rays in relativistic<br />
flows have therefore been provi<strong>de</strong>d (Fig. 15.3).<br />
155