Untitled - Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de l'Observatoire de Grenoble
Untitled - Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de l'Observatoire de Grenoble
Untitled - Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de l'Observatoire de Grenoble
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
15.4 Transport phenomena in accretion-ejection flows<br />
The existence of accretion-ejection structures raises a number of prominent issues, which, for most of them,<br />
have been around from the very beginning of this field of research.<br />
15.4.1 Jet stability<br />
The exceptional propagation length of jets, as compared to their radii, raises the question of the physical<br />
mechanisms responsible for their stability. This question has at least two different aspects:<br />
(1) Jet global stability properties. Purely hydrodynamical jets are quickly <strong>de</strong>stroyed due to the <strong>de</strong>velopment<br />
of the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability. MHD jets seem to be more stable with respect to Kelvin-Helmholtz mo<strong>de</strong>s.<br />
However, such MHD jet are prone to be unstable with respect to purely MHD (current- and pressure-driven)<br />
instabilities, the outcome of which is still unknown on theoretical grounds. These instabilities are well-known<br />
to be quite disruptive in the fusion context, so that the very small level of research activity in the astrophysics<br />
community on these issues is all the more surprising.<br />
(2) Particle acceleration. However, one certainly does not want to quench every possible mo<strong>de</strong> of instability<br />
in MHD jets as some turbulence is required to accelerate the non-thermal particle populations which are<br />
responsible for the high energy emission of these objects. In particular, in the framework of the two-flow mo<strong>de</strong>l<br />
<strong>de</strong>veloped by the SHERPA team, it is essential to un<strong>de</strong>rstand and characterize the processes responsible for the<br />
turbulent stirring of the pair plasma, which tap the energy reservoir of the large scale MHD jet.<br />
In or<strong>de</strong>r to make progress on these issues, the effect of pressure- and current-driven instabilities in jets are<br />
examined ab initio. Pressure-driven instabilities are expected to be most disruptive in jets confined by the<br />
hoop-stress, and a linear analysis of the problem has been un<strong>de</strong>rtaken (Kersale, Longaretti & Pelletier, 2000,<br />
A&A, 363,1166; Longaretti 2003; Longaretti & Baty in preparation). A complete review of the question of jet<br />
structure and stability, based on both the astrophysical and fusion literature, has also been written (Longaretti<br />
2005).<br />
15.4.2 Transport in accretion disks<br />
The question of mass and angular momentum transport in accretion disks is one of the ol<strong>de</strong>st issues in this branch<br />
of astrophysics, and has not yet been resolved in a satisfying way. In spite of the remarkable progress un<strong>de</strong>rgone<br />
in the last fifteen years, with the (re)discovery of the “Magneto-Rotational Instability” (MRI, Balbus & Hawley<br />
1991, ApJ, 376, 214), and the (essentially numerical) characterization of the induced turbulent transport in the<br />
nonlinear regime (e.g. Stone et al. 1996, ApJ, 463, 656), many issues are still acutely open:<br />
(1) Not all disks, or disk regions, are ionized enough to sustain MHD activity (e.g. Gammie 1996, ApJ, 457,<br />
355, Matsumura & Pudritz 2003, ApJ, 598, 645). The transport in these regions must therefore be sustained<br />
through non-MHD mechanisms.<br />
(2) The accretion-ejection structures most actively studied in our group do require a fairly high level of turbulent<br />
resistivity to be self-consistently maintained (Ferreira & Pelletier 1995, A&A, 295, 807). It is unclear<br />
whether the MRI can provi<strong>de</strong> it.<br />
To settle these questions, we have first addressed and completely reinvestigated the old issue of the existence<br />
of subcritical turbulence in keplerian flows. The un<strong>de</strong>rlying i<strong>de</strong>a is that all linearly stable flows accessible to<br />
laboratory experiments are observed to un<strong>de</strong>rgo a transition to turbulence (called subcritical). The initial<br />
proposal by Shakura & Sunyaev (1973, A&A, 24, 337) was that such a mechanism was at work in keplerian<br />
disks (which are hydrodynamically stable). This picture has given rise to controversial points of view in the<br />
astrophysics literature (Balbus, Hawley & Stone 1996, ApJ, 467, 76; Richard & Zahn 1999, A&A, 347, 734).<br />
Due to the formidable complexity of the problem, little progress had been accomplished on this issue at a<br />
fundamental level, until the last <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>, where an interesting breakthrough has been operated in the fluid<br />
150