Annual general report of the controller and - Parliament of Tanzania

Annual general report of the controller and - Parliament of Tanzania Annual general report of the controller and - Parliament of Tanzania

parliament.go.tz
from parliament.go.tz More from this publisher
29.01.2013 Views

• There was no evidence that competitive quotations, which were 13% of all procurement, were received in sealed envelopes and opened in public at a specified time. • There were no records of the tender opening proceedings. Tender evaluation and award thereof was not properly done. • There were instances where lowest evaluated bidders were not awarded tenders without plausible reasons. • In other instances, evaluation committee members visited bidders during tender evaluation process. • No tender award was advertised during FY 2007/08 contrary to regulation 67 (3) of G. N. No. 98 and regulation 97 (12) of G.N. No. 97. • Tender documents were not professionally kept, making retrieval of information unnecessarily long. • The current organisation structure doesn’t provide an environment for the tender board and the tender board secretariat (“PMU”) to discharge their functions ___________________________________________________________ Office of the Controller and Auditor General PA&oBs 2007/08 40

independently as required by section 38 of PPA 04. In the absence of a legally formed PMU, some procurement requisitions were directly submitted to the tender board by user departments. • There was no evidence that PPRA was notified on the constitution of the tender board as required by Section 29 (1) of the PPA 04 and contract documents were not submitted to relevant authorities as per regulation 116 of G. N. No. 97. • On certain instances adhoc tender boards were formed to deal with specific procurements; this is contrary to the public procurement regulations. • There was no evidence that the Accounting Officer appointed Goods Inspection and Acceptance Committees as required by regulation 127 and 128 of G. N. No. 97 for all goods that were procured during the year. • The procurement of consultancy services for the Review of the Organization Structure, Job Evaluation and Grading, and Development of ___________________________________________________________ Office of the Controller and Auditor General PA&oBs 2007/08 41

• There was no evidence that<br />

competitive quotations, which<br />

were 13% <strong>of</strong> all procurement,<br />

were received in sealed<br />

envelopes <strong>and</strong> opened in<br />

public at a specified time.<br />

• There were no records <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

tender opening proceedings.<br />

Tender evaluation <strong>and</strong> award<br />

<strong>the</strong>re<strong>of</strong> was not properly done.<br />

• There were instances where<br />

lowest evaluated bidders were<br />

not awarded tenders without<br />

plausible reasons.<br />

• In o<strong>the</strong>r instances, evaluation<br />

committee members visited<br />

bidders during tender<br />

evaluation process.<br />

• No tender award was<br />

advertised during FY 2007/08<br />

contrary to regulation 67 (3) <strong>of</strong><br />

G. N. No. 98 <strong>and</strong> regulation 97<br />

(12) <strong>of</strong> G.N. No. 97.<br />

• Tender documents were not<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essionally kept, making<br />

retrieval <strong>of</strong> information<br />

unnecessarily long.<br />

• The current organisation<br />

structure doesn’t provide an<br />

environment for <strong>the</strong> tender<br />

board <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> tender board<br />

secretariat (“PMU”) to<br />

discharge <strong>the</strong>ir functions<br />

___________________________________________________________<br />

Office <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Controller <strong>and</strong> Auditor General PA&oBs 2007/08 40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!