Annual general report of the controller and - Parliament of Tanzania
Annual general report of the controller and - Parliament of Tanzania Annual general report of the controller and - Parliament of Tanzania
� Down Payment Down payment of USD 100,000 was paid on 16 th April 2007 that is three (3) months after the award instead of 15 days as per signed agreement. The amount so deposited was not equivalent to 10% of the selling price as per agreement. According to the agreement the deposit was supposed to be USD 651,000. The deposit was done vide cheque No. 487000454 dated 14/04/2007 issued by Mashreq Bank (Zabeel Branch) of P.O.Box 1250 Dubai, UAE into NSSF bank account No. 870-800-600-3900 at standard Chartered Bank, international house branch. Further on 14 th May 2007 the same bank deposited another down payment of USD 551,000 vide cheque no. 487000625 dated 14/5/2007 into same NSSF bank account at Standard Chartered Bank. Besides the buyer breaching second condition in the agreement which required payment of 10% of selling price within 15 days, it remained unusual and doubtful whether money laundering element existed, adding obscurity surrounding genuineness of the transaction. � Maintenance of the Property on Disposal According to the agreement, the buyer was supposed to be responsible for all matters related to cleanness, security and insurance immediately after payment of 10% of the selling price. The Fund, however, had incurred these expenses after payment of the deposit (i.e 14 th May, 2007) until the date of handling over of the property to the buyer (October 2008). � Non Compliance to Terms of Payments The agreement stipulated that after down payment of the 10% of the selling price, the remaining ___________________________________________________________ Office of the Controller and Auditor General PA&oBs 2007/08 160
alance (i.e. 90% of selling price) should be paid within 90 days from the date of the offer (i.e from 1 st November, 2007). However, payment of the balance was delayed for almost seventeen (17) months before being paid in September, 2008, causing the Fund to incur uncalculated loss in terms or exchange rate fluctuation and real earnings on investment. We could not judge why the fund did not terminate the contract despite that massive failure by the buyer to honor payment within the prescribed period of 90 days. 8.11 Irregular Sale of club Oasis by NSSF During the year under review, the Fund disposed of its properties located at plot No.489-517 block “J”, situated at Mbezi Beach, off African Road, Kinondoni, Dar es Salaam at total value Shs. 600 Million to M/s TILE FRESH Limited of Dar es Salaam. The property, referred to as Club Oasis Mbezi Beach, was initially acquired on 7 th August, 2003 from Tanzania Investment Bank limited at a cost of Shs. 350,000,000/= and subsequently handled over to the Fund on 30 th June, 2004. Transfer of the property was transferred to the Fund’s name on 5 th September, 2006. Our review over the transaction revealed some irregularities as shown hereunder: (a) Un-procedural Change of Buyer Management accepted changes of buyers from one Dr. Hawa Sinare to M/s Tile fresh limited, without the approval of the Board of Trustees. The change was effected following an undated letter, with no reference from Dr. Hawa Sinare. Further, M/s Tile Fresh Limited was incorporated on 22 nd of December 2004, just the same day when the ___________________________________________________________ Office of the Controller and Auditor General PA&oBs 2007/08 161
- Page 129 and 130: - IPTL and Songas accounted for abo
- Page 131 and 132: Key performance targets not achieve
- Page 133 and 134: failing to effectively and efficien
- Page 135 and 136: SN Donor Year of deposit Amount 1.
- Page 137 and 138: anger post 10 TANESCO Electricity c
- Page 139 and 140: aired without raising Broadcasting
- Page 141 and 142: 6.13.2 National Development Corpora
- Page 143 and 144: CHAPTER SEVEN COMPLIANCE WITH PROCU
- Page 145 and 146: of appropriate procurement methods
- Page 147 and 148: evaluation committee to the tender
- Page 149 and 150: A review of the tendering procedure
- Page 151 and 152: Dodoma (2 sites ) 10 Singida (2 sit
- Page 153 and 154: TANAPA. Furthermore, there was no e
- Page 155 and 156: VAT). How the Joint venture came ab
- Page 157 and 158: CHAPTER EIGHT CONTRACT MANAGEMENT 8
- Page 159 and 160: 3. Unjustified Single source 4. Lac
- Page 161 and 162: Property Market Consult -TZS. 107,9
- Page 163 and 164: Item Old rate (Shs) New rate (Shs)
- Page 165 and 166: Furthermore, throughout the period
- Page 167 and 168: sub-contractor or agents; and the c
- Page 169 and 170: • A further invoice No. 402706 fr
- Page 171 and 172: in the cost of the measured works a
- Page 173 and 174: The original contract price with Gr
- Page 175 and 176: of the project and not responding t
- Page 177 and 178: (a) Tender Evaluation Documents We
- Page 179: (i) Selling price for the entire pr
- Page 183 and 184: payment of the purchase price, whic
- Page 185 and 186: a building. However, the following
- Page 187 and 188: 9.0 Introduction CHAPTER NINE ASSET
- Page 189 and 190: No periodic physical verification e
- Page 191 and 192: Lack of motor vehicles registration
- Page 193 and 194: Registrar through his letter with r
- Page 195 and 196: gone in dispute which has not been
- Page 197 and 198: of the Authority by the then Presid
- Page 199 and 200: undertake various activities and th
- Page 201 and 202: 9.9 Un-recovered Loans and Advances
- Page 203 and 204: committed by TPB Staff during the p
- Page 205 and 206: have invested the amount in other v
- Page 207 and 208: 3.7 Millions (2006) loan 9. Kiwira
- Page 209 and 210: een executed and availed as support
- Page 211 and 212: Tanzania Posts Corporation is an ag
- Page 213 and 214: 10.0 Introduction CHAPTER TEN HUMAN
- Page 215 and 216: employees. The appraising system he
- Page 217 and 218: without employment contract contrar
- Page 219 and 220: to a lower rank, status and pay whi
- Page 221 and 222: 10.8 Accumulation of annual leave b
- Page 223 and 224: 11.0 Introduction CHAPTER ELEVEN CO
- Page 225 and 226: Dar es Salaam City Council since th
- Page 227 and 228: allowances varies from one organiza
- Page 229 and 230: 11.3 Parliamentarians serving as Di
� Down Payment<br />
Down payment <strong>of</strong> USD 100,000 was paid on 16 th<br />
April 2007 that is three (3) months after <strong>the</strong> award<br />
instead <strong>of</strong> 15 days as per signed agreement. The<br />
amount so deposited was not equivalent to 10% <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> selling price as per agreement. According to<br />
<strong>the</strong> agreement <strong>the</strong> deposit was supposed to be USD<br />
651,000. The deposit was done vide cheque No.<br />
487000454 dated 14/04/2007 issued by Mashreq<br />
Bank (Zabeel Branch) <strong>of</strong> P.O.Box 1250 Dubai, UAE<br />
into NSSF bank account No. 870-800-600-3900 at<br />
st<strong>and</strong>ard Chartered Bank, international house<br />
branch.<br />
Fur<strong>the</strong>r on 14 th May 2007 <strong>the</strong> same bank deposited<br />
ano<strong>the</strong>r down payment <strong>of</strong> USD 551,000 vide cheque<br />
no. 487000625 dated 14/5/2007 into same NSSF<br />
bank account at St<strong>and</strong>ard Chartered Bank. Besides<br />
<strong>the</strong> buyer breaching second condition in <strong>the</strong><br />
agreement which required payment <strong>of</strong> 10% <strong>of</strong><br />
selling price within 15 days, it remained unusual<br />
<strong>and</strong> doubtful whe<strong>the</strong>r money laundering element<br />
existed, adding obscurity surrounding genuineness<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> transaction.<br />
� Maintenance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Property on Disposal<br />
According to <strong>the</strong> agreement, <strong>the</strong> buyer was<br />
supposed to be responsible for all matters related<br />
to cleanness, security <strong>and</strong> insurance immediately<br />
after payment <strong>of</strong> 10% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> selling price. The<br />
Fund, however, had incurred <strong>the</strong>se expenses after<br />
payment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> deposit (i.e 14 th May, 2007) until<br />
<strong>the</strong> date <strong>of</strong> h<strong>and</strong>ling over <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> property to <strong>the</strong><br />
buyer (October 2008).<br />
� Non Compliance to Terms <strong>of</strong> Payments<br />
The agreement stipulated that after down payment<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 10% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> selling price, <strong>the</strong> remaining<br />
___________________________________________________________<br />
Office <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Controller <strong>and</strong> Auditor General PA&oBs 2007/08 160