Annual general report of the controller and - Parliament of Tanzania
Annual general report of the controller and - Parliament of Tanzania Annual general report of the controller and - Parliament of Tanzania
8.1 Power purchase agreement by Songas Limited - TANESCO Review of the power purchase agreement between TANESCO and Songas Ltd revealed that TANESCO has the right and hence was to review all the initial Songas project costs to confirm that the project costs were as provided by Songas. This finalization of project costs is still pending while TANESCO continues to pay to Songas capacity charges based on the original stated Songas project costs. This constitutes a major concern in decision making since these initial project costs form the basis of approximately US$ 5 million monthly capacity charges that continues to significantly cripple TANESCO’s liquidity. I am of of the opinion that management should immediately review the Songas project cost to establish the correct amount which should be paid by TANESCO. 8.2 Development of Dar es salaam water front by TPA - Shs.433,837,547 A review made on the procurement processes and contracting procedures for the agreement entered between TPA and M/S CPCS Consultants for development of Dar es Salaam water front at a contract price of Shs. 433,837,547 had the following anomalies: S/N Item/Anomaly Description 1. Evaluation of expression of interest 2. Informal arrangements There was no evaluation report regarding the expression of interest on development of water front instead the report prepared by the PMU to the tender board was used as an evaluation report Director of planning wrote to Director General requesting approval for prefeasibility study on the project and stated to have conducted informal consultancy and informally had requested M/s CPCS Consultants to perform the assignment. ___________________________________________________________ Office of the Controller and Auditor General PA&oBs 2007/08 138
3. Unjustified Single source 4. Lack of advertisement for consultancy The Director of Procurement and Supplies convinced the Tender Board to award the tender M/s CPCS Consultants on a single source basis contrary to the requirements of Reg.35 (GN 98 of 2005) through Memo No. 91/2007. In addition to M/s CPCS Consultants, 12 firms were invited to submit their consultancy proposals by invitation letters. In this document prepared by Director of Planning the address for requesting clarification was said to be the Director of Planning instead of the PMU contrary to Reg.112 (4) of PPR) 8.3 Security Service Contract between M/s Gema Security and TPA Review procurement procedures and the contract entered between the two parties revealed the following weaknesses:- • The contractor was selected based on the lowest price and not lowest evaluated bid ignoring other technical requirements. • Contract was signed on 1 st February, 2008 without official seal • The contract did not specify the number of guards required • Massive theft cases were reported and no action was taken by the TPA management. The contract between TPA and Gema Security did not specified the number of guards required such that the bills raised have been varying from one month to another which cast doubt on where the payment was made for the services rendered to the Authority or not as tabulated below:- ___________________________________________________________ Office of the Controller and Auditor General PA&oBs 2007/08 139
- Page 107 and 108: (iii) Tanzania Engineering and Mech
- Page 109 and 110: ensure that this regulation is full
- Page 111 and 112: Customer Meter No. Date connected F
- Page 113 and 114: Date Number of visitors per TANAPA
- Page 115 and 116: Loss of Potential Revenues from Pri
- Page 117 and 118: CHAPTER FIVE INTERNAL CONTROL SYSTE
- Page 119 and 120: prepared (NBC A/C No. 022103000156
- Page 121 and 122: 5.6 Lack of segregation of duties.
- Page 123 and 124: monthly basis to do a reconciliatio
- Page 125 and 126: CHAPTER SIX PERFORMANCE REVIEW 6.0
- Page 127 and 128: From the table above, the operation
- Page 129 and 130: - IPTL and Songas accounted for abo
- Page 131 and 132: Key performance targets not achieve
- Page 133 and 134: failing to effectively and efficien
- Page 135 and 136: SN Donor Year of deposit Amount 1.
- Page 137 and 138: anger post 10 TANESCO Electricity c
- Page 139 and 140: aired without raising Broadcasting
- Page 141 and 142: 6.13.2 National Development Corpora
- Page 143 and 144: CHAPTER SEVEN COMPLIANCE WITH PROCU
- Page 145 and 146: of appropriate procurement methods
- Page 147 and 148: evaluation committee to the tender
- Page 149 and 150: A review of the tendering procedure
- Page 151 and 152: Dodoma (2 sites ) 10 Singida (2 sit
- Page 153 and 154: TANAPA. Furthermore, there was no e
- Page 155 and 156: VAT). How the Joint venture came ab
- Page 157: CHAPTER EIGHT CONTRACT MANAGEMENT 8
- Page 161 and 162: Property Market Consult -TZS. 107,9
- Page 163 and 164: Item Old rate (Shs) New rate (Shs)
- Page 165 and 166: Furthermore, throughout the period
- Page 167 and 168: sub-contractor or agents; and the c
- Page 169 and 170: • A further invoice No. 402706 fr
- Page 171 and 172: in the cost of the measured works a
- Page 173 and 174: The original contract price with Gr
- Page 175 and 176: of the project and not responding t
- Page 177 and 178: (a) Tender Evaluation Documents We
- Page 179 and 180: (i) Selling price for the entire pr
- Page 181 and 182: alance (i.e. 90% of selling price)
- Page 183 and 184: payment of the purchase price, whic
- Page 185 and 186: a building. However, the following
- Page 187 and 188: 9.0 Introduction CHAPTER NINE ASSET
- Page 189 and 190: No periodic physical verification e
- Page 191 and 192: Lack of motor vehicles registration
- Page 193 and 194: Registrar through his letter with r
- Page 195 and 196: gone in dispute which has not been
- Page 197 and 198: of the Authority by the then Presid
- Page 199 and 200: undertake various activities and th
- Page 201 and 202: 9.9 Un-recovered Loans and Advances
- Page 203 and 204: committed by TPB Staff during the p
- Page 205 and 206: have invested the amount in other v
- Page 207 and 208: 3.7 Millions (2006) loan 9. Kiwira
8.1 Power purchase agreement by Songas Limited - TANESCO<br />
Review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> power purchase agreement between<br />
TANESCO <strong>and</strong> Songas Ltd revealed that TANESCO has <strong>the</strong><br />
right <strong>and</strong> hence was to review all <strong>the</strong> initial Songas project<br />
costs to confirm that <strong>the</strong> project costs were as provided by<br />
Songas. This finalization <strong>of</strong> project costs is still pending<br />
while TANESCO continues to pay to Songas capacity charges<br />
based on <strong>the</strong> original stated Songas project costs. This<br />
constitutes a major concern in decision making since <strong>the</strong>se<br />
initial project costs form <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> approximately US$ 5<br />
million monthly capacity charges that continues to<br />
significantly cripple TANESCO’s liquidity.<br />
I am <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> opinion that management should<br />
immediately review <strong>the</strong> Songas project cost to establish<br />
<strong>the</strong> correct amount which should be paid by TANESCO.<br />
8.2 Development <strong>of</strong> Dar es salaam water front by TPA -<br />
Shs.433,837,547<br />
A review made on <strong>the</strong> procurement processes <strong>and</strong><br />
contracting procedures for <strong>the</strong> agreement entered between<br />
TPA <strong>and</strong> M/S CPCS Consultants for development <strong>of</strong> Dar es<br />
Salaam water front at a contract price <strong>of</strong> Shs. 433,837,547<br />
had <strong>the</strong> following anomalies:<br />
S/N Item/Anomaly Description<br />
1.<br />
Evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />
expression <strong>of</strong><br />
interest<br />
2. Informal<br />
arrangements<br />
There was no evaluation <strong>report</strong><br />
regarding <strong>the</strong> expression <strong>of</strong> interest on<br />
development <strong>of</strong> water front instead <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>report</strong> prepared by <strong>the</strong> PMU to <strong>the</strong><br />
tender board was used as an evaluation<br />
<strong>report</strong><br />
Director <strong>of</strong> planning wrote to Director<br />
General requesting approval for prefeasibility<br />
study on <strong>the</strong> project <strong>and</strong><br />
stated to have conducted informal<br />
consultancy <strong>and</strong> informally had<br />
requested M/s CPCS Consultants to<br />
perform <strong>the</strong> assignment.<br />
___________________________________________________________<br />
Office <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Controller <strong>and</strong> Auditor General PA&oBs 2007/08 138