Annual general report of the controller and - Parliament of Tanzania

Annual general report of the controller and - Parliament of Tanzania Annual general report of the controller and - Parliament of Tanzania

parliament.go.tz
from parliament.go.tz More from this publisher
29.01.2013 Views

8.1 Power purchase agreement by Songas Limited - TANESCO Review of the power purchase agreement between TANESCO and Songas Ltd revealed that TANESCO has the right and hence was to review all the initial Songas project costs to confirm that the project costs were as provided by Songas. This finalization of project costs is still pending while TANESCO continues to pay to Songas capacity charges based on the original stated Songas project costs. This constitutes a major concern in decision making since these initial project costs form the basis of approximately US$ 5 million monthly capacity charges that continues to significantly cripple TANESCO’s liquidity. I am of of the opinion that management should immediately review the Songas project cost to establish the correct amount which should be paid by TANESCO. 8.2 Development of Dar es salaam water front by TPA - Shs.433,837,547 A review made on the procurement processes and contracting procedures for the agreement entered between TPA and M/S CPCS Consultants for development of Dar es Salaam water front at a contract price of Shs. 433,837,547 had the following anomalies: S/N Item/Anomaly Description 1. Evaluation of expression of interest 2. Informal arrangements There was no evaluation report regarding the expression of interest on development of water front instead the report prepared by the PMU to the tender board was used as an evaluation report Director of planning wrote to Director General requesting approval for prefeasibility study on the project and stated to have conducted informal consultancy and informally had requested M/s CPCS Consultants to perform the assignment. ___________________________________________________________ Office of the Controller and Auditor General PA&oBs 2007/08 138

3. Unjustified Single source 4. Lack of advertisement for consultancy The Director of Procurement and Supplies convinced the Tender Board to award the tender M/s CPCS Consultants on a single source basis contrary to the requirements of Reg.35 (GN 98 of 2005) through Memo No. 91/2007. In addition to M/s CPCS Consultants, 12 firms were invited to submit their consultancy proposals by invitation letters. In this document prepared by Director of Planning the address for requesting clarification was said to be the Director of Planning instead of the PMU contrary to Reg.112 (4) of PPR) 8.3 Security Service Contract between M/s Gema Security and TPA Review procurement procedures and the contract entered between the two parties revealed the following weaknesses:- • The contractor was selected based on the lowest price and not lowest evaluated bid ignoring other technical requirements. • Contract was signed on 1 st February, 2008 without official seal • The contract did not specify the number of guards required • Massive theft cases were reported and no action was taken by the TPA management. The contract between TPA and Gema Security did not specified the number of guards required such that the bills raised have been varying from one month to another which cast doubt on where the payment was made for the services rendered to the Authority or not as tabulated below:- ___________________________________________________________ Office of the Controller and Auditor General PA&oBs 2007/08 139

8.1 Power purchase agreement by Songas Limited - TANESCO<br />

Review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> power purchase agreement between<br />

TANESCO <strong>and</strong> Songas Ltd revealed that TANESCO has <strong>the</strong><br />

right <strong>and</strong> hence was to review all <strong>the</strong> initial Songas project<br />

costs to confirm that <strong>the</strong> project costs were as provided by<br />

Songas. This finalization <strong>of</strong> project costs is still pending<br />

while TANESCO continues to pay to Songas capacity charges<br />

based on <strong>the</strong> original stated Songas project costs. This<br />

constitutes a major concern in decision making since <strong>the</strong>se<br />

initial project costs form <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> approximately US$ 5<br />

million monthly capacity charges that continues to<br />

significantly cripple TANESCO’s liquidity.<br />

I am <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> opinion that management should<br />

immediately review <strong>the</strong> Songas project cost to establish<br />

<strong>the</strong> correct amount which should be paid by TANESCO.<br />

8.2 Development <strong>of</strong> Dar es salaam water front by TPA -<br />

Shs.433,837,547<br />

A review made on <strong>the</strong> procurement processes <strong>and</strong><br />

contracting procedures for <strong>the</strong> agreement entered between<br />

TPA <strong>and</strong> M/S CPCS Consultants for development <strong>of</strong> Dar es<br />

Salaam water front at a contract price <strong>of</strong> Shs. 433,837,547<br />

had <strong>the</strong> following anomalies:<br />

S/N Item/Anomaly Description<br />

1.<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

expression <strong>of</strong><br />

interest<br />

2. Informal<br />

arrangements<br />

There was no evaluation <strong>report</strong><br />

regarding <strong>the</strong> expression <strong>of</strong> interest on<br />

development <strong>of</strong> water front instead <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>report</strong> prepared by <strong>the</strong> PMU to <strong>the</strong><br />

tender board was used as an evaluation<br />

<strong>report</strong><br />

Director <strong>of</strong> planning wrote to Director<br />

General requesting approval for prefeasibility<br />

study on <strong>the</strong> project <strong>and</strong><br />

stated to have conducted informal<br />

consultancy <strong>and</strong> informally had<br />

requested M/s CPCS Consultants to<br />

perform <strong>the</strong> assignment.<br />

___________________________________________________________<br />

Office <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Controller <strong>and</strong> Auditor General PA&oBs 2007/08 138

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!