29.01.2013 Views

Annual general report of the controller and - Parliament of Tanzania

Annual general report of the controller and - Parliament of Tanzania

Annual general report of the controller and - Parliament of Tanzania

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Dodoma (2 sites ) 10<br />

Singida (2 sites) 11<br />

Bulwark security 2<br />

Alliance day <strong>and</strong> Night 1<br />

Panic system 1<br />

Alliance day <strong>and</strong><br />

Night<br />

2<br />

Real security 3<br />

During <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> selection <strong>of</strong> successful winners for<br />

each lot <strong>the</strong> tender board at its meeting held on 13 th<br />

August, 2007 directed <strong>the</strong> concerned department to<br />

conduct <strong>the</strong> vetting <strong>of</strong> best three in each lot for fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

decision. The vetting <strong>report</strong> conducted by <strong>the</strong> department<br />

<strong>of</strong> security <strong>and</strong> its <strong>report</strong> signed by Chief Security Manager,<br />

recommended a reversal <strong>of</strong> recommendations made by <strong>the</strong><br />

evaluation team, <strong>and</strong> recommended o<strong>the</strong>rwise based on<br />

own criteria <strong>of</strong> evaluation <strong>and</strong> Aliance Day <strong>and</strong> Night<br />

Security Guard Limited <strong>of</strong> BOX 305 Tabora was awarded to<br />

render security service for Arusha, Kilimanjaro, Tabora,<br />

Dodoma, Mwanga, Same, Tarakea, Hai, Everest Chinese<br />

restaurant, Nzega, rest house from 31/10/2007 to<br />

31/10/2009.<br />

However, <strong>the</strong> justification for vetting <strong>and</strong> awarding such<br />

many lots to one private security company instead <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

ones recommended by evaluation committee could not be<br />

made available. As far as <strong>the</strong> procurement process is<br />

concerned <strong>and</strong> interference <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> procurement process by<br />

Security department could not be ascertained. The fund<br />

vetting recommendation implies a gross violation <strong>of</strong><br />

procurement Act <strong>and</strong> regulations which attracts<br />

investigation <strong>the</strong> respective authorities to ascertain<br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>re were fair play in procurement process.<br />

It was fur<strong>the</strong>r noted that bid document submitted by<br />

Alliance Security did not comply with <strong>the</strong> format <strong>of</strong> a<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard tender document issued by <strong>the</strong> PPRA casting<br />

doubt as to how <strong>the</strong> company competed <strong>and</strong> won this<br />

tender <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> security company ended up<br />

underperforming in some areas assigned to it. We are <strong>of</strong><br />

___________________________________________________________<br />

Office <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Controller <strong>and</strong> Auditor General PA&oBs 2007/08 131

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!