Annual general report of the controller and - Parliament of Tanzania
Annual general report of the controller and - Parliament of Tanzania Annual general report of the controller and - Parliament of Tanzania
• 18% of the Local Government Authorities submitted their tender notices to the Authority • 46% of the PA&oBss submitted their tender notices to the Authority • The reported contracts to the PPRA were about 62% of the collected tender notices It was not evident whether PPRA provided feedback to the PEs that complied with the reporting requirements, with an emphasis to highlight areas where they did not perform right in the preparation of annual procurement plans, tender notices, and contracts. This implies that, enforcement is not properly instituted and, lack of feedback from the Regulator to Procurement Entities may make them consider the reporting requirement as a formality and not a useful exercise. The Authorities management should ensure that compliance monitoring is enforced and a feedback mechanism instituted 6.9 Tanzania National Park 6.9.1 Under-utilization of Donor Fund TANAPA does receive funds from development partners for specialised activities such as specialised training for local staff and conducting health related activities e.g. assessing biodiversity health. However, these funds have been kept idle and are not used to implement the intended purposes. For instance there was a total amount of TZS 126.3 million from various donors as at 30 June 2008 that had not been used to send staff for specialised training programs for more than three years now. See table below:- ___________________________________________________________ Office of the Controller and Auditor General PA&oBs 2007/08 114
SN Donor Year of deposit Amount 1. Mac Arthur Foundation 1996 51,006,321 2. University of Queensland 2004 21,772,750 3. Ministry of Natural Resources 13,510,081 4. National Environment Council 10,781,000 5. University of Greenwich 8,285,691 6. Tanzania Promotion Services. 7,533,151 7. KRCD 7,000,000 8. T.W.P.F 6,450,790 Total 126,339,785 The intended objectives of the grants may not be met and, this may destroy the credibility of TANAPA and other local Authorities in the eyes of the development partners which could lead into reduction/ cessation of funding local development activities. Management should utilise these grants timely for the purposes they were meant for. 6.9.2 Delayed implementation or non implementation of development projects We noted cases of delayed or non-implementation of the development projects. From our sample of development projects that we reviewed, budgeted development projects amounting to Shs.1,980,912,829 were not implemented during the year under review as shown in the table below:- S/n Name of project 1. CPW house at Seronera Park Budget Actual Actual Achie- Serengeti vement 88,000,000 - Not done Remarks Tender process not completed 2. Social Sere- 41,200,000 - Not Tender ___________________________________________________________ Office of the Controller and Auditor General PA&oBs 2007/08 115
- Page 83 and 84: customers resulting into over or un
- Page 85 and 86: overstatement of the assets; nonrev
- Page 87 and 88: y the liabilities imposed by variou
- Page 89 and 90: Tanzania International Container Te
- Page 91 and 92: while the Board of External Trade f
- Page 93 and 94: 3.2.2 National Insurance Corporatio
- Page 95 and 96: Kagera Sugar Company Ltd General Ty
- Page 97 and 98: Emunio Tanzania Limited Kiwira Coal
- Page 99 and 100: guaranteed 75% by the government an
- Page 101 and 102: 4.0 Introduction CHAPTER FOUR EXPEN
- Page 103 and 104: 4.1.3 Questionable payments (i) Nat
- Page 105 and 106: The above certificate was in favour
- Page 107 and 108: (iii) Tanzania Engineering and Mech
- Page 109 and 110: ensure that this regulation is full
- Page 111 and 112: Customer Meter No. Date connected F
- Page 113 and 114: Date Number of visitors per TANAPA
- Page 115 and 116: Loss of Potential Revenues from Pri
- Page 117 and 118: CHAPTER FIVE INTERNAL CONTROL SYSTE
- Page 119 and 120: prepared (NBC A/C No. 022103000156
- Page 121 and 122: 5.6 Lack of segregation of duties.
- Page 123 and 124: monthly basis to do a reconciliatio
- Page 125 and 126: CHAPTER SIX PERFORMANCE REVIEW 6.0
- Page 127 and 128: From the table above, the operation
- Page 129 and 130: - IPTL and Songas accounted for abo
- Page 131 and 132: Key performance targets not achieve
- Page 133: failing to effectively and efficien
- Page 137 and 138: anger post 10 TANESCO Electricity c
- Page 139 and 140: aired without raising Broadcasting
- Page 141 and 142: 6.13.2 National Development Corpora
- Page 143 and 144: CHAPTER SEVEN COMPLIANCE WITH PROCU
- Page 145 and 146: of appropriate procurement methods
- Page 147 and 148: evaluation committee to the tender
- Page 149 and 150: A review of the tendering procedure
- Page 151 and 152: Dodoma (2 sites ) 10 Singida (2 sit
- Page 153 and 154: TANAPA. Furthermore, there was no e
- Page 155 and 156: VAT). How the Joint venture came ab
- Page 157 and 158: CHAPTER EIGHT CONTRACT MANAGEMENT 8
- Page 159 and 160: 3. Unjustified Single source 4. Lac
- Page 161 and 162: Property Market Consult -TZS. 107,9
- Page 163 and 164: Item Old rate (Shs) New rate (Shs)
- Page 165 and 166: Furthermore, throughout the period
- Page 167 and 168: sub-contractor or agents; and the c
- Page 169 and 170: • A further invoice No. 402706 fr
- Page 171 and 172: in the cost of the measured works a
- Page 173 and 174: The original contract price with Gr
- Page 175 and 176: of the project and not responding t
- Page 177 and 178: (a) Tender Evaluation Documents We
- Page 179 and 180: (i) Selling price for the entire pr
- Page 181 and 182: alance (i.e. 90% of selling price)
- Page 183 and 184: payment of the purchase price, whic
SN Donor<br />
Year <strong>of</strong><br />
deposit Amount<br />
1. Mac Arthur Foundation 1996 51,006,321<br />
2. University <strong>of</strong> Queensl<strong>and</strong> 2004 21,772,750<br />
3. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Natural Resources 13,510,081<br />
4. National Environment Council 10,781,000<br />
5. University <strong>of</strong> Greenwich 8,285,691<br />
6. <strong>Tanzania</strong> Promotion Services. 7,533,151<br />
7. KRCD 7,000,000<br />
8. T.W.P.F 6,450,790<br />
Total 126,339,785<br />
The intended objectives <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> grants may not be met <strong>and</strong>,<br />
this may destroy <strong>the</strong> credibility <strong>of</strong> TANAPA <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r local<br />
Authorities in <strong>the</strong> eyes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> development partners which<br />
could lead into reduction/ cessation <strong>of</strong> funding local<br />
development activities.<br />
Management should utilise <strong>the</strong>se grants timely for <strong>the</strong><br />
purposes <strong>the</strong>y were meant for.<br />
6.9.2 Delayed implementation or non implementation <strong>of</strong><br />
development projects<br />
We noted cases <strong>of</strong> delayed or non-implementation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
development projects. From our sample <strong>of</strong> development<br />
projects that we reviewed, budgeted development projects<br />
amounting to Shs.1,980,912,829 were not implemented<br />
during <strong>the</strong> year under review as shown in <strong>the</strong> table below:-<br />
S/n Name <strong>of</strong><br />
project<br />
1. CPW<br />
house at<br />
Seronera<br />
Park Budget Actual Actual<br />
Achie-<br />
Serengeti <br />
vement<br />
88,000,000 - Not<br />
done<br />
Remarks<br />
Tender<br />
process<br />
not<br />
completed<br />
2. Social Sere- 41,200,000 - Not Tender<br />
___________________________________________________________<br />
Office <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Controller <strong>and</strong> Auditor General PA&oBs 2007/08 115
Change language