Abstracts 2005 - The Psychonomic Society

Abstracts 2005 - The Psychonomic Society Abstracts 2005 - The Psychonomic Society

psychonomic.org
from psychonomic.org More from this publisher
29.01.2013 Views

Posters 1085–1091 Thursday Evening how switch costs decrease as preparation time increases in both paradigms. Differences were found in the nature of switch costs in terms of their rate, asymptote, and gain parameters. Mixed models of the nonswitch and switch trial data further highlight the underlying differences in switch costs between paradigms and lend support to the notion that an executive control component may play a role in switch costs for predictable but not for unpredictable task switching. (1085) Stimulus-Based Priming of Tasks in Task Switching. IRING KOCH & WOLFGANG PRINZ, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, & ALAN ALLPORT, University of Oxford—Performance costs when switching tasks are related to interference. One determinant of task interference is whether the stimuli have previously occurred in the context of competing tasks. To explore the role of prior stimulus–task association in task interference, we used bivalent stimuli but had subjects practice them with only one of two tasks (“consistent mapping,” CM), or with both tasks (“varied mapping” of stimuli to tasks, VM). In alphabet arithmetic tasks, we found greater performance costs for VM than for CM stimuli. This suggests increased interference when stimuli are associated with both tasks because such stimuli prime the competing task. Using numerical judgment tasks, we had subjects practice only CM stimuli and then, after practice, reversed the consistent stimulus–task mapping. Mapping reversal resulted in massive stimulus-priming effects. These stimuluspriming effects were reduced by cue-based task preparation, suggesting a precedence of cue–task over stimulus–task associations. (1086) Cue-Based Preparation Effects on Switch Costs and the Contents of Task Set. AGATHA LENARTOWICZ, Princeton University, NICK YEUNG, Carnegie Mellon University, & JONATHAN D. COHEN, Princeton University—This study considers both whether cue-based preparation affects switch costs and the degree to which this process interacts with task-set contents. Schuch & Koch (2003, JEP:HPP) have shown that in a no-go paradigm, cue-based preparation preceding a no-go trial does not affect switch costs, thus suggesting that task execution is the primary contributor to switch costs. In this study, we found that both the inclusion of active no-go trials and the nature of the task sets switched between can affect cue-based preparation. We tested participants using two variants of a task-switching paradigm: varying the no-go trials from active to passive, and varying the task sets from number judgments (i.e., odd/even, greater/less than 5) to semantic judgments (i.e., living/nonliving, large/small). Passive no-go trials and semantic judgments resulted in larger switch costs relative to active no-go trials and number judgments. We show that cue-based preparation without task execution can affect the magnitude of switch costs. (1087) Shift Costs and Benefits Following Errors and Error Corrections. MARCO STEINHAUSER & RONALD HÜBNER, University of Konstanz—When participants alternate randomly between two tasks, performance is impaired in task shift trials relative to task repetition trials. We hypothesized that a portion of this shift cost is caused by the strengthening of task-related associations that took place on the previous trial when the response was produced. Therefore, shift effects following errors and error corrections were investigated in a series of three experiments, in which a task-shifting paradigm with a deadline procedure was applied. As predicted by our strengthening account, shift benefits instead of shift costs were observed following a specific type of error (Experiment 1). The same pattern of results occurred when participants explicitly indicated the detection of an error (Experiment 2). In contrast, shift costs were observed when the errors were corrected (Experiment 3). It was concluded that the shift effects in task-shifting are due to the strengthening of associations contingent to the production of an overt response. 64 (1088) Alternating Between Verbal and Spatial Memory Tasks: Costs and Benefits. CINDY CHAMBERLAND & KATHERINE GUÉRARD, Université Laval, FABRICE B. PARMENTIER, University of Plymouth, ROBERT ROUSSEAU, Defence R&D Canada, & SÉBASTIEN TREM- BLAY, Université Laval (sponsored by Robert Rousseau)—There is ample evidence for a performance cost in alternating between tasks (e.g., Rogers & Monsell, 1995). Most of the research has so far focused on the impact of switching task set between identification tasks that share the same source of information and require no memory load. In the present study, we examined whether the task switch cost also applies by alternating between verbal and spatial memory tasks. The procedure required the reproduction of a sequence of stimuli: letters for the verbal serial recall task and spatially distributed dots for the spatial serial recall task. A recall performance cost was observed in the spatial task, but a benefit emerged in the verbal task. This asymmetric pattern is modulated by the memory set size and the number of alternations. Our findings are informative with regard to the relative contributions of interference and reconfiguration to performance. (1089) The Effect of the Cue-to-Stimulus Interval on Transferable Improvement in Task Switching. MEREDITH E. MINEAR, Washington University, & PRITI SHAH, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor— Earlier work has demonstrated that task-switching performance can improve with practice (Kray & Lindenberger, 2000) and that this improvement can transfer to a new switching context (Minear et al., 2002). In this experiment, we examined the extent to which the amount of time given to prepare for a switch affects the training and transfer benefits seen. We manipulated the cue-to-stimulus interval (200 vs. 600 msec) used during training and transfer. With a short interval (200 msec), individuals who received practice on switching showed transferable improvement in comparison with a control group. However, with a long interval (600 msec), in which preparation is hypothesized to be complete, individuals who received switching practice did not differ from a control group on a transfer task. This suggests that transferable improvements seen after practice on switching tasks relate to the preparatory component of switching but do not affect the residual switch costs seen after preparation is complete. (1090) Effects of Bilingualism and Task Switching on Hemispheric Interaction. SUZANNE E. WELCOME & CHRISTINE CHIARELLO, University of California, Riverside—People perform complex tasks more efficiently when relevant information is presented to separate hemispheres (the across-hemisphere advantage). In this study, we investigated whether variation in bilingual language experience affects control of hemispheric interaction. Monolinguals, bilinguals who frequently interact with other bilinguals, and bilinguals who primarily interact with monolinguals performed two divided visual field tasks. Participants received a less complex digit-matching task and a more complex addition task with matching items shown in the same or opposite visual fields. On half of the trials, the task was the same as the previous trial, and on half the task switched across trials. There were no language group differences in task-switching cost. However, language group moderated the effect of task complexity on the across-hemisphere advantage. Bilingualism may alter how processing is coordinated across hemispheres. (1091) Sequential Dependencies in a Task-Switching Paradigm. ANDREW P. HANLIN, SUSAN LAGRONE, & DANIEL H. SPIELER, Georgia Institute of Technology—Traditional response time (RT) experiments are interested primarily in variation in RT due to experimental manipulations. Residual variability in RT is often treated as random “noise.” Recent evidence has been presented that there are sequential patterns in RTs over the course of an experimental session (Gilden,

Thursday Evening Posters 1092–1098 2001; Wagenmakers, Farrell, & Ratcliff, 2004). Specifically, there appear to be slowly decaying correlations between successive trials that are consistent with the presence of long-range dependencies (LRDs). Gilden (2001) suggested that these dependencies may arise when individuals maintain a consistent mental task set and that switching between tasks may eliminate these LRDs. We conducted two experiments that required individuals to switch between two (Experiment 1) and three (Experiment 2) tasks. The sequences from participants in both experiments contained evidence of LRDs. These results suggest that maintenance of a single task set is not required for performance to exhibit LRDs. (1092) Top-Down Expectancy and Prior Task Interference During Task Switching. MARK E. FAUST & ADAM YORK, University of North Carolina, Charlotte—Prior task interference (PTI), the deleterious influence of a relevant stimulus attribute from a prior switched-from task (e.g., naming one of two words based on font color) on the performance of the switched-to task (e.g., naming one of two words based on category membership), was assessed during a task-switching paradigm. Participants were cued with two performance tasks (of four possible tasks) for each four-trial sequence and switched tasks between the second and third trials in each sequence. Manipulation of the proportion of postswitch trials in which PTI was possible resulted in differential effects on PTI for task-switch trials and for n + 1 trials (i.e., the trial following a switch trial). The results suggest that cognitive control over PTI is lowered directly following a task switch and that inhibitory control over processes associated with a switched-from task is a capacity-limited operation. (1093) Do Errors Betray Executive Control in Task Switching? JASON IVANOFF, CATHERINE M. ARRINGTON, & ALEX GOTLER, Vanderbilt University—Task switching generates RT costs that have been taken to reflect the time needed for a control system to implement task-set reconfiguration. In typical explicit task cuing paradigms, each task is cued by one cue, creating a confound between switching tasks and switching cues. Logan and Bundesen (2003) resolved this concern with a four-cue/two-task procedure, demonstrating much larger costs for switching cues than for switching tasks. They argued that task-switch costs may not reflect the duration of control processes. Here we revisit this design with a focus on errors under different levels of speed stress. The results from the error analysis reveal a pattern for switching tasks and switching cues unlike that for RTs. The distinctive patterns in RTs and error rates leave open the possibility that “true” switch costs can be found in explicit task cuing procedures and highlight the importance of considering multiple measures of performance. • VISUAL WORD RECOGNITION • (1094) Do Subtypes Exist Among Nondyslexic Readers? STACY L. BIRCH & DANIEL J. PRINCE, SUNY, Brockport—Recent studies have suggested that individuals with developmental dyslexia, similar to those with acquired dyslexia, can be classified into subtypes, for instance those with phonological or surface dyslexia. These subtypes are based on dissociations between component reading skills such as phonological coding and orthographic processing. For instance, an individual with particular difficulty in orthographic processing might be classified as having the surface subtype of dyslexia. In the present study, we investigated to what extent nondisabled readers demonstrate dissociations among component reading skills similar to those of the subgroups of dyslexic readers. Nondisabled readers completed standardized word identification and spelling tasks along with computerized reaction time tasks measuring phonological coding, orthographic processing, and rapid naming of symbols. Of these readers, 18% showed a pattern of dissociations in reading skills similar to the 65 phonological subtype of dyslexia, and 15% showed a surface subtype pattern. Implications of these results for subtyping in developmental dyslexia are discussed. (1095) The Level Repetition Effect in Semantic Processing: The Role of Attention and Inhibition. GWEN L. SCHMIDT & CAROL A. SEGER, Colorado State University—We explored the role of attention to levels of semantic relatedness (close vs. distant) in semantic processing. Balota et al. (2001) suggested that attention is focused on different semantic levels depending on the task. We hypothesized that when processing semantic information at high or low levels of semantic relatedness, a priming effect would be obtained based on the preceding semantic level, similar to the level repetition effect with visual stimuli (Robertson, 1996). In two experiments, subjects responded to high- and lowassociation word pairs or familiar and unfamiliar metaphors. Both experiments demonstrated a significant interaction: for high-association/ familiar stimuli, there was a priming effect of level of relatedness; for low-association/unfamiliar stimuli, there was a negative effect, with slower reaction times for a repeated level. These results suggest that both attention to and inhibition of semantic relatedness levels are important aspects of semantic processing at both word and sentence levels. (1096) The Regularity Effect and Repetition in Printed Word Processing. LEONARD KATZ, STEPHEN D. KATZ, & KENNETH R. PUGH, Haskins Laboratories—Our research program has studied changes in cognition and brain processing as initially unfamiliar printed words become more familiar. Katz et al. (2005, Neuropsychologia) suggested that phonological assembly (as indexed by the regularity effect, RE) was the means by which low-frequency words were initially recognized in a lexical decision task, but that assembly was replaced by a nonanalytic process as words were repeated. In contrast, when the task was naming, the RE persisted longer under word repetition. The present study replicated and extended the original results. It supports the interpretation of a decreasing RE with repetition as a reduction in phonological assembly. The introduction of 50% pseudohomophones into the set of nonwords in lexical decision and naming decreased the persistence of the regularity effect, although more so in lexical decision than in naming. Pseudohomophones suppress phonological assembly by making it an inefficient mechanism for discriminating between words and nonwords. (1097) Phonological Neighborhood Density and Frequency in Visual Word Recognition. LAWRENCE LOCKER, Georgia Southern University, GREG B. SIMPSON, University of Kansas, & PAUL MATTSON, Washington State University—Phonological neighborhood density and frequency were investigated in three word recognition tasks. The results of a lexical-decision experiment revealed that words with highfrequency neighbors were responded to more rapidly than words with low-frequency neighbors, although this effect was restricted to words with many neighbors. A semantic-categorization task revealed some evidence of competitive effects of high-frequency neighbors, although this effect was again a function of neighborhood density. In contrast, the results of a rhyme detection task revealed facilitative effects of both neighborhood density and frequency. This pattern of results suggests that the influence of phonological neighborhood on word processing varies as a function of the level of analysis as determined by task requirements. The implications of these results for word processing are discussed. (1098) Masked Priming With Orthographic Neighbors: An Interaction Between Relative Prime–Target Frequency and Neighborhood Size. MARIKO NAKAYAMA & CHRISTOPHER R. SEARS, University of Calgary—In models of visual word identification that incorporate inhibitory competition among activated lexical units, a word’s higher

Thursday Evening Posters 1092–1098<br />

2001; Wagenmakers, Farrell, & Ratcliff, 2004). Specifically, there appear<br />

to be slowly decaying correlations between successive trials that<br />

are consistent with the presence of long-range dependencies (LRDs).<br />

Gilden (2001) suggested that these dependencies may arise when individuals<br />

maintain a consistent mental task set and that switching between<br />

tasks may eliminate these LRDs. We conducted two experiments<br />

that required individuals to switch between two (Experiment 1)<br />

and three (Experiment 2) tasks. <strong>The</strong> sequences from participants in<br />

both experiments contained evidence of LRDs. <strong>The</strong>se results suggest<br />

that maintenance of a single task set is not required for performance<br />

to exhibit LRDs.<br />

(1092)<br />

Top-Down Expectancy and Prior Task Interference During Task<br />

Switching. MARK E. FAUST & ADAM YORK, University of North<br />

Carolina, Charlotte—Prior task interference (PTI), the deleterious influence<br />

of a relevant stimulus attribute from a prior switched-from<br />

task (e.g., naming one of two words based on font color) on the performance<br />

of the switched-to task (e.g., naming one of two words based<br />

on category membership), was assessed during a task-switching paradigm.<br />

Participants were cued with two performance tasks (of four<br />

possible tasks) for each four-trial sequence and switched tasks between<br />

the second and third trials in each sequence. Manipulation of<br />

the proportion of postswitch trials in which PTI was possible resulted<br />

in differential effects on PTI for task-switch trials and for n + 1 trials<br />

(i.e., the trial following a switch trial). <strong>The</strong> results suggest that cognitive<br />

control over PTI is lowered directly following a task switch and<br />

that inhibitory control over processes associated with a switched-from<br />

task is a capacity-limited operation.<br />

(1093)<br />

Do Errors Betray Executive Control in Task Switching? JASON<br />

IVANOFF, CATHERINE M. ARRINGTON, & ALEX GOTLER, Vanderbilt<br />

University—Task switching generates RT costs that have been<br />

taken to reflect the time needed for a control system to implement<br />

task-set reconfiguration. In typical explicit task cuing paradigms,<br />

each task is cued by one cue, creating a confound between switching<br />

tasks and switching cues. Logan and Bundesen (2003) resolved this<br />

concern with a four-cue/two-task procedure, demonstrating much<br />

larger costs for switching cues than for switching tasks. <strong>The</strong>y argued<br />

that task-switch costs may not reflect the duration of control<br />

processes. Here we revisit this design with a focus on errors under different<br />

levels of speed stress. <strong>The</strong> results from the error analysis reveal<br />

a pattern for switching tasks and switching cues unlike that for RTs.<br />

<strong>The</strong> distinctive patterns in RTs and error rates leave open the possibility<br />

that “true” switch costs can be found in explicit task cuing procedures<br />

and highlight the importance of considering multiple measures<br />

of performance.<br />

• VISUAL WORD RECOGNITION •<br />

(1094)<br />

Do Subtypes Exist Among Nondyslexic Readers? STACY L. BIRCH<br />

& DANIEL J. PRINCE, SUNY, Brockport—Recent studies have suggested<br />

that individuals with developmental dyslexia, similar to those<br />

with acquired dyslexia, can be classified into subtypes, for instance<br />

those with phonological or surface dyslexia. <strong>The</strong>se subtypes are based<br />

on dissociations between component reading skills such as phonological<br />

coding and orthographic processing. For instance, an individual<br />

with particular difficulty in orthographic processing might be<br />

classified as having the surface subtype of dyslexia. In the present<br />

study, we investigated to what extent nondisabled readers demonstrate<br />

dissociations among component reading skills similar to those of the<br />

subgroups of dyslexic readers. Nondisabled readers completed standardized<br />

word identification and spelling tasks along with computerized<br />

reaction time tasks measuring phonological coding, orthographic<br />

processing, and rapid naming of symbols. Of these readers, 18%<br />

showed a pattern of dissociations in reading skills similar to the<br />

65<br />

phonological subtype of dyslexia, and 15% showed a surface subtype<br />

pattern. Implications of these results for subtyping in developmental<br />

dyslexia are discussed.<br />

(1095)<br />

<strong>The</strong> Level Repetition Effect in Semantic Processing: <strong>The</strong> Role of<br />

Attention and Inhibition. GWEN L. SCHMIDT & CAROL A. SEGER,<br />

Colorado State University—We explored the role of attention to levels<br />

of semantic relatedness (close vs. distant) in semantic processing. Balota<br />

et al. (2001) suggested that attention is focused on different semantic<br />

levels depending on the task. We hypothesized that when processing<br />

semantic information at high or low levels of semantic relatedness, a<br />

priming effect would be obtained based on the preceding semantic level,<br />

similar to the level repetition effect with visual stimuli (Robertson,<br />

1996). In two experiments, subjects responded to high- and lowassociation<br />

word pairs or familiar and unfamiliar metaphors. Both experiments<br />

demonstrated a significant interaction: for high-association/<br />

familiar stimuli, there was a priming effect of level of relatedness; for<br />

low-association/unfamiliar stimuli, there was a negative effect, with<br />

slower reaction times for a repeated level. <strong>The</strong>se results suggest that both<br />

attention to and inhibition of semantic relatedness levels are important<br />

aspects of semantic processing at both word and sentence levels.<br />

(1096)<br />

<strong>The</strong> Regularity Effect and Repetition in Printed Word Processing.<br />

LEONARD KATZ, STEPHEN D. KATZ, & KENNETH R. PUGH,<br />

Haskins Laboratories—Our research program has studied changes in<br />

cognition and brain processing as initially unfamiliar printed words<br />

become more familiar. Katz et al. (<strong>2005</strong>, Neuropsychologia) suggested<br />

that phonological assembly (as indexed by the regularity effect,<br />

RE) was the means by which low-frequency words were initially recognized<br />

in a lexical decision task, but that assembly was replaced by<br />

a nonanalytic process as words were repeated. In contrast, when the<br />

task was naming, the RE persisted longer under word repetition. <strong>The</strong><br />

present study replicated and extended the original results. It supports<br />

the interpretation of a decreasing RE with repetition as a reduction in<br />

phonological assembly. <strong>The</strong> introduction of 50% pseudohomophones<br />

into the set of nonwords in lexical decision and naming decreased the<br />

persistence of the regularity effect, although more so in lexical decision<br />

than in naming. Pseudohomophones suppress phonological assembly<br />

by making it an inefficient mechanism for discriminating between<br />

words and nonwords.<br />

(1097)<br />

Phonological Neighborhood Density and Frequency in Visual Word<br />

Recognition. LAWRENCE LOCKER, Georgia Southern University,<br />

GREG B. SIMPSON, University of Kansas, & PAUL MATTSON,<br />

Washington State University—Phonological neighborhood density and<br />

frequency were investigated in three word recognition tasks. <strong>The</strong> results<br />

of a lexical-decision experiment revealed that words with highfrequency<br />

neighbors were responded to more rapidly than words with<br />

low-frequency neighbors, although this effect was restricted to words<br />

with many neighbors. A semantic-categorization task revealed some<br />

evidence of competitive effects of high-frequency neighbors, although<br />

this effect was again a function of neighborhood density. In<br />

contrast, the results of a rhyme detection task revealed facilitative effects<br />

of both neighborhood density and frequency. This pattern of results<br />

suggests that the influence of phonological neighborhood on<br />

word processing varies as a function of the level of analysis as determined<br />

by task requirements. <strong>The</strong> implications of these results for word<br />

processing are discussed.<br />

(1098)<br />

Masked Priming With Orthographic Neighbors: An Interaction<br />

Between Relative Prime–Target Frequency and Neighborhood Size.<br />

MARIKO NAKAYAMA & CHRISTOPHER R. SEARS, University of<br />

Calgary—In models of visual word identification that incorporate inhibitory<br />

competition among activated lexical units, a word’s higher

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!