Abstracts 2005 - The Psychonomic Society
Abstracts 2005 - The Psychonomic Society Abstracts 2005 - The Psychonomic Society
Posters 1029–1035 Thursday Evening (1029) Different Balance of Good and Bad Effects of Phonological Similarity for Words and Nonwords. EMILIA L. LUOTONIEMI, University of Helsinki, ELISABET M. SERVICE, University of Helsinki and Dalhousie University, & SINI E. MAURY, University of Helsinki (sponsored by John Connolly)—This study explored whether earlier results of differential effects of similar syllables at the beginning (harmful) or end (helpful) of nonwords on the short-term memory for lists of these nonwords could be replicated for real words. We studied lists with phonologically redundant syllables located either at the beginning or end of two-syllable words or nonwords. The results showed that redundancy at the end did not impair memory for nonwords but harmed the recall of words. Irrespective of lexicality, lists of beginningredundant items were more difficult to recall than those of endredundant items. According to the results, the balance between helpful and harmful effects of redundancy seems different in short-term recall of words versus nonwords. The harmful effect of similarity might be related to recalling the order of multiple items, whereas the helpful effect, which was seen at the syllable level, could be the consequence of more successful redintegration of the redundant part of the stimulus. (1030) The Facilitatory Effects of Phonological Similarity on Immediate Serial Recall. BYRON MURPHY, BRANDON ABBS, & PRAHLAD GUPTA, University of Iowa (sponsored by Prahlad Gupta)—The phonological similarity effect (PSE) in immediate serial recall can be facilitatory, especially for lists of nonwords and when item recall scoring is used. However, few studies have demonstrated this effect for strict serial scoring of lists of real words, and the PSE has rarely been examined with polysyllabic stimuli. We investigated the facilitatory PSE employing lists of two-syllable words and strict serial scoring. Using visual and auditory presentation, Experiments 1 and 2 found higher recall for rhyming than for dissimilar lists, but lower recall for alliterative than for dissimilar lists (i.e., a classic PSE), suggesting that the position of the similarity between list items influences the direction of the PSE. Experiment 3 showed that the benefit of rhyming similarity was not due to differences in amounts of feature overlap between items in rhyming and alliterative lists. The results suggest that the PSE varies considerably with the properties of the list stimuli. (1031) Processing Domain, Working Memory, and Reasoning Ability. JING CHEN, Grand Valley State University, & SANDRA HALE & JOEL MYERSON, Washington University—Undergraduates (N = 207) were tested on psychometric reasoning tests and simple and complex span tasks (two verbal and two visuospatial in each case). Complex and simple span tasks used the same items, but complex span tasks required additional processing involving transformation of items or irrelevant secondary tasks. This additional processing resulted in complex span scores significantly lower than their simple span counterparts. The overall trend was for verbal spans to predict spatial reasoning better than spatial spans predicted verbal reasoning. Both simple and complex spans predicted reasoning in the same domain, but only complex spans predicted across domains. Although factor analysis revealed spatial and verbal factors, but not simple and complex span factors, the fact that only complex spans predict reasoning in the opposite domain supports the hypothesis that such tasks uniquely tap an important ability. Interestingly, complex spans involving transformations predicted opposite-domain reasoning better than did complex spans with secondary tasks. (1032) Effects of Working Memory and Domain Knowledge in Overcoming Mental Sets in Creative Problem Solving. TRAVIS R. RICKS, University of Illinois, Chicago, & KANDI JO TURLEY-AMES, Idaho State University—The present study assessed whether individual differences in working memory (WM) impact mental sets created by ex- 56 pertise. Wiley’s adaptation of the remote association task (RAT) was used to create mental sets in baseball experts; half of the participants, both experts and novices, solved baseball-consistent items, and the other half solved baseball-misleading items. Number of RAT items solved and reaction time were evaluated on the basis of version, WM span, and expertise. Contrary to previous research (Wiley, 1998), WM was related to RAT performance, but expertise was not. For Study 2, a warning was given to investigate whether recruiting methods created mental sets for novices in Study 1, in a way analogous to Wiley’s warning study. Results for the Study 2 were similar to those of Study 1 and Wiley’s study. Again, a main effect was observed for WM. The importance of considering WM span and recruitment techniques when studying how experts overcome mental sets is discussed. (1033) Does Domain Knowledge Moderate Effects of Working Memory on Chess Performance? THOMAS J. WAGNER & DAVID Z. HAM- BRICK, Michigan State University—Previous research has demonstrated that both working memory (WM) and domain-specific knowledge contribute to individual differences in higher level cognition. This study investigated the interplay of these two factors using chess as the venue for research. The specific question was whether high levels of chess knowledge attenuate effects of WM on domain-relevant performance, which would agree with a compensation hypothesis of the relationship between these two factors. Participants representing wide ranges of WM and chess knowledge performed tests of WM and chess knowledge, in addition to two chess-related criterion tasks. One task was to remember the locations of briefly presented chess positions, and the other involved finding chess moves that would force checkmate. Both WM and chess knowledge predicted performance on the chess tasks. However, inconsistent with the compensation hypothesis, there was no interaction. This finding suggests that WM and domain knowledge may operate independently to determine cognitive performance under some circumstances. (1034) Encoding Strategies and the Mixed-List Paradox in Serial Recall. CAROLINE MORIN, University of Warwick, MARIE POIRIER, City University, London, CLAUDETTE FORTIN, Université Laval, & CHARLES HULME, University of York—In free recall tasks, when low- and high-frequency items are mixed within the to-be-remembered lists, the usual recall advantage found for high-frequency words is eliminated or reversed. Recently, this mixed-list paradox has also been demonstrated for short-term serial recall (Hulme, Stuart, Brown, & Morin, 2003). Although a number of theoretical interpretations of this mixed-list paradox have been proposed, it has also been suggested that it could simply be a result of participant-controlled strategies (Watkins, LeCompte, & Kim, 2000). The present study was designed to assess whether this explanation can be applied to immediate and delayed serial recall. The results showed that high-frequency items were better recalled than low-frequency items in pure lists but that this effect was eliminated in mixed lists, whether they were given under intentional or incidental learning conditions. This pattern is not consistent with the view that the mixed-list paradox can be explained by participant-controlled strategies. • FALSE MEMORY • (1035) Deficits in Frontal Function Restrict Effective Use of Individual Item Information. AYANNA K. THOMAS, Colby College, & MARK A. MCDANIEL, Washington University—Recent studies suggest that age differences in false memories may be mediated by deficits in frontal lobe functioning (Butler et al., 2004). The present study examined whether older adults who perform poorly on test designed to assess frontal function were less likely to benefit from manipulations designed to reduce false memories. Participants were presented with semantically related items in the context of sentences that
Thursday Evening Posters 1036–1042 converged on either the dominant or the subordinate meaning of a nonpresented critical theme word. Only younger adults and high frontal functioning older adults benefited from the contextual information provided by the dominant meaning conditions and showed reductions in false memory susceptibility. However, when gist-based processing of list items was made less accessible, as in the subordinate meaning condition, all groups showed similar reductions in false memory susceptibility. These results suggest that low frontal functioning older adults encode item information but overrely on accessible gist information. (1036) Hybrid False Recollection: Evidence From ERP. STEVEN HAMIL- TON, University of Sussex, ROBYN E. HOLLIDAY, University of Kent, & FAY JOHNSON & BRENDAN S. WEEKES, University of Sussex (sponsored by Brendan S. Weekes)—Two experiments examined whether semantic and phonological false memory effects are additive by using hybrid lists of written words presented using the DRM paradigm. Hybrid lists were constructed so that each critical lure was related in both meaning and sound to studied words. In Experiment 1, 36 adults were tested, and results showed a reliable false memory effect with the semantic, phonological, and hybrid lists. However, there was no evidence of an additive effect across lists. In Experiment 2, EEG recordings were taken while participants performed the same tasks. The results showed differential ERP patterns during recognition performance across the hybrid and nonhybrid items. Of most interest was a pattern of bilateral activation during false recollection for hybrid items that was not observed during semantic and phonological false recollection. We interpret the data in terms of models of recollection and argue that hybrid lists generate a stronger sense of gist-based recollection than do nonhybrid lists. (1037) “Hybrid” False Memories Following Primed Naming: Expectancy at Encoding or Bias at Retrieval? PATRICK A. O’CONNOR, CHI- SHING TSE, & JAMES H. NEELY, SUNY, Albany (sponsored by James H. Neely)—False memories of nail in recognition are higher when the semantically related prime HAMMER and the form-related target mail have been incidentally studied together versus separately in a prior naming task. This contiguity-based increase in semantic-form “hybrid” false memories (HFMs) occurs at a 750-msec prime–target SOA with a high, but not with a low, study phase relatedness proportion (RP; Humphreys, Burt, & Lawrence, 2001). We find this contiguitybased increase in HFMs with a high RP at both a 760-msec SOA (6% increase) and a 175-msec SOA (10% increase), but not with a low RP and a 175-msec SOA (1% decrease). Because the 175-msec SOA should minimize expectancy at encoding, the large 10% contiguitybased increase in HFMs obtained in the high-RP/175-msec SOA condition favors a bias-at-retrieval account over an expectancy-at-encoding account of why contiguity inflates semantic-form HFMs only when the study phase RP is high. (1038) The Development of False Memories in Bilingual Children and Adults. NADINE GAGNON, Lakehead University, MARK L. HOWE, Lancaster University, & LISA PAQUETTE, Lakehead University (sponsored by Mark L. Howe)—The effects of bilingual (English– French) study and test on rates of children’s and adults’ true and false memories were examined. Children aged 6 through 12 and universityaged adults participated in a standard DRM false memory task using free recall. The results showed that (1) both true and false memories increased with age, (2) true recall was higher in unilingual than in bilingual conditions for all ages, and (3) there were fewer false memories in bilingual than in unilingual conditions for the youngest children, no differences for the 7- and 12-year-olds, and among adults, more false memories in bilingual than in unilingual conditions. These findings are discussed in the context of language organization models and bilingual memory development. 57 (1039) The False Recall Effect Following Multitrial Serial Learning. JOHN P. TAYLOR, KARA DESOUZA, SARA HABER, & WILLIAM P. WALLACE, University of Nevada, Reno—Lists of associates to key words produce large intrusion rates of the key words during later free recall. Participants with a well-practiced retrieval plan for a learned list should be able to exclude intrusions from recall. In the present experiment, nine lists of the 12 most frequent associates to key words (e.g., sour, candy, sugar, etc., for the key word sweet) were taken from Roediger and McDermott (1995). Three lists were presented for one, three, and eight trials each. Twenty-four participants read each word aloud, and 24 attempted to anticipate the next word in the series. Lists were cued for final recall by presenting the first word on each list. On final recall, the proportion of key-word intrusions following the eight trials of serial anticipation was .21. For all other conditions, values ranged from .44 to .49. Imposing serial order on recall over eight trials considerably reduced the intrusion rates commonly found with associate lists. (1040) Congruency Effect of Presentation Modality on Haptic, Visual, and Auditory False Memory. TOMOHIRO NABETA, Hiroshima University, KEIJI OKADA, Aichi University, & JUN KAWAHARA, Hiroshima University—False recognition of an item that is not presented (the lure) can be produced when participants study and are then tested on their recognition of a list of items related to the lure, which is not included in the list. False recognition has been shown to be reduced when the study and test modality are congruent (e.g., both visual) rather than being different (e.g., visual study and auditory test). The present study examined whether such a congruency effect occurs for visual, haptic and auditory modalities. After studying items presented haptically, visually or auditorily, participants took a recognition test in one of the three modalities. The congruency between the study and test modalities reduced false recognition when studied haptically or visually. These results suggest that distinctive cues encoded through the haptic and visual modality help the participants to recognize the studied words more accurately, resulted in less false recognition. (1041) Memory Illusions and Repeated Testing in Children: The “Reversed” DRM Effect. ROBYN E. HOLLIDAY, University of Kent, Canterbury, TIMOTHY N. ODEGARD, University of Texas, Arlington, & CHARLES J. BRAINERD & VALERIE F. REYNA, Cornell University—The Deese/Roediger–McDermott (DRM) paradigm was used to investigate the effects of an encoding manipulation (read versus generate) and a retrieval manipulation (test repetition) on 10- to 12-year-olds’ true and false recognition. Children studied two blocks of four DRM lists, one “read” (i.e., whole words) and the other “self-generated” (word fragment completion). Each block was followed by either one or three recognition tests. False recognition of critical distractors was lower in the generation condition than in the read condition. These false-memory responses were doubly dissociated by encoding condition and test repetition: Repetition increased false alarms in the read condition but decreased them in the generate condition. Such findings are consistent with fuzzy-trace theory’s opponent processes account of false memory. (1042) Dissociations in Children’s True and False Recall. MARK L. HOWE, Lancaster University—Across three experiments, the role of associative versus categorical relations in children’s veridical and false memories was examined. Children studied DRM lists or categorized word or picture lists, with or without category labels as primes. For veridical recall: (1) There were developmental increases in recall regardless of list type, presentation modality, or priming; (2) regardless of age, categorized lists were better recalled than DRM lists, regardless of modality or priming. For false recall: (1) There were developmental increases in recall, except for pictures; (2) no differences were pres-
- Page 5 and 6: Friday Morning Papers 28-33 audiovi
- Page 7 and 8: Friday Morning Papers 41-47 concept
- Page 9 and 10: Friday Morning Papers 54-60 model.
- Page 11 and 12: Paper 68 Friday Morning ing in this
- Page 13 and 14: Friday Afternoon Papers 77-83 small
- Page 15 and 16: Friday Afternoon Papers 91-97 with
- Page 17 and 18: Friday Afternoon Papers 105-111 tim
- Page 19 and 20: Friday Afternoon Papers 119-125 nat
- Page 21 and 22: Friday Afternoon Papers 132-133 4:5
- Page 23 and 24: Saturday Morning Papers 142-148 ror
- Page 25 and 26: Saturday Morning Papers 155-161 Vis
- Page 27 and 28: Saturday Morning Papers 169-174 inf
- Page 29 and 30: Saturday Morning Papers 182-187 man
- Page 31 and 32: Saturday Morning Papers 195-199 10:
- Page 33 and 34: Saturday Afternoon Papers 207-213 (
- Page 35 and 36: Saturday Afternoon Papers 221-227 t
- Page 37 and 38: Saturday Afternoon Papers 235-241 s
- Page 39 and 40: Saturday Afternoon Papers 249-254 T
- Page 41 and 42: Saturday Afternoon Papers 262-264 u
- Page 43 and 44: Sunday Morning Papers 272-278 many
- Page 45 and 46: Sunday Morning Papers 286-292 enon.
- Page 47 and 48: Sunday Morning Papers 300-306 Maggi
- Page 49 and 50: Sunday Morning Papers 314-321 sitiv
- Page 51 and 52: Sunday Morning Papers 328-330 11:00
- Page 53 and 54: Thursday Evening Posters 1008-1013
- Page 55: Thursday Evening Posters 1021-1028
- Page 59 and 60: Thursday Evening Posters 1050-1056
- Page 61 and 62: Thursday Evening Posters 1064-1070
- Page 63 and 64: Thursday Evening Posters 1078-1084
- Page 65 and 66: Thursday Evening Posters 1092-1098
- Page 67 and 68: Thursday Evening Posters 1106-1112
- Page 69 and 70: Thursday Evening Posters 1120-1122
- Page 71 and 72: Friday Noon Posters 2008-2013 tone
- Page 73 and 74: Friday Noon Posters 2021-2027 (2021
- Page 75 and 76: Friday Noon Posters 2035-2041 (2035
- Page 77 and 78: Friday Noon Posters 2049-2055 studi
- Page 79 and 80: Friday Noon Posters 2064-2070 objec
- Page 81 and 82: Friday Noon Posters 2078-2083 DON D
- Page 83 and 84: Friday Noon Posters 2092-2097 MERSK
- Page 85 and 86: Friday Noon Posters 2106-2111 & KEI
- Page 87 and 88: Friday Noon Posters 2119-2122 (2119
- Page 89 and 90: Friday Evening Posters 3008-3014 si
- Page 91 and 92: Friday Evening Posters 3023-3029 ti
- Page 93 and 94: Friday Evening Posters 3036-3043 (3
- Page 95 and 96: Friday Evening Posters 3051-3056 WE
- Page 97 and 98: Friday Evening Posters 3065-3070 of
- Page 99 and 100: Friday Evening Posters 3078-3084 gr
- Page 101 and 102: Friday Evening Posters 3091-3097 (3
- Page 103 and 104: Friday Evening Posters 3105-3111 (3
- Page 105 and 106: Friday Evening Posters 3120-3122 we
Thursday Evening Posters 1036–1042<br />
converged on either the dominant or the subordinate meaning of a<br />
nonpresented critical theme word. Only younger adults and high<br />
frontal functioning older adults benefited from the contextual information<br />
provided by the dominant meaning conditions and showed reductions<br />
in false memory susceptibility. However, when gist-based<br />
processing of list items was made less accessible, as in the subordinate<br />
meaning condition, all groups showed similar reductions in false<br />
memory susceptibility. <strong>The</strong>se results suggest that low frontal functioning<br />
older adults encode item information but overrely on accessible<br />
gist information.<br />
(1036)<br />
Hybrid False Recollection: Evidence From ERP. STEVEN HAMIL-<br />
TON, University of Sussex, ROBYN E. HOLLIDAY, University of Kent,<br />
& FAY JOHNSON & BRENDAN S. WEEKES, University of Sussex<br />
(sponsored by Brendan S. Weekes)—Two experiments examined whether<br />
semantic and phonological false memory effects are additive by using<br />
hybrid lists of written words presented using the DRM paradigm. Hybrid<br />
lists were constructed so that each critical lure was related in both<br />
meaning and sound to studied words. In Experiment 1, 36 adults were<br />
tested, and results showed a reliable false memory effect with the semantic,<br />
phonological, and hybrid lists. However, there was no evidence<br />
of an additive effect across lists. In Experiment 2, EEG recordings<br />
were taken while participants performed the same tasks. <strong>The</strong><br />
results showed differential ERP patterns during recognition performance<br />
across the hybrid and nonhybrid items. Of most interest was a<br />
pattern of bilateral activation during false recollection for hybrid<br />
items that was not observed during semantic and phonological false<br />
recollection. We interpret the data in terms of models of recollection<br />
and argue that hybrid lists generate a stronger sense of gist-based recollection<br />
than do nonhybrid lists.<br />
(1037)<br />
“Hybrid” False Memories Following Primed Naming: Expectancy<br />
at Encoding or Bias at Retrieval? PATRICK A. O’CONNOR, CHI-<br />
SHING TSE, & JAMES H. NEELY, SUNY, Albany (sponsored by James<br />
H. Neely)—False memories of nail in recognition are higher when the<br />
semantically related prime HAMMER and the form-related target mail<br />
have been incidentally studied together versus separately in a prior<br />
naming task. This contiguity-based increase in semantic-form “hybrid”<br />
false memories (HFMs) occurs at a 750-msec prime–target SOA<br />
with a high, but not with a low, study phase relatedness proportion<br />
(RP; Humphreys, Burt, & Lawrence, 2001). We find this contiguitybased<br />
increase in HFMs with a high RP at both a 760-msec SOA (6%<br />
increase) and a 175-msec SOA (10% increase), but not with a low RP<br />
and a 175-msec SOA (1% decrease). Because the 175-msec SOA<br />
should minimize expectancy at encoding, the large 10% contiguitybased<br />
increase in HFMs obtained in the high-RP/175-msec SOA condition<br />
favors a bias-at-retrieval account over an expectancy-at-encoding<br />
account of why contiguity inflates semantic-form HFMs only when<br />
the study phase RP is high.<br />
(1038)<br />
<strong>The</strong> Development of False Memories in Bilingual Children and<br />
Adults. NADINE GAGNON, Lakehead University, MARK L. HOWE,<br />
Lancaster University, & LISA PAQUETTE, Lakehead University<br />
(sponsored by Mark L. Howe)—<strong>The</strong> effects of bilingual (English–<br />
French) study and test on rates of children’s and adults’ true and false<br />
memories were examined. Children aged 6 through 12 and universityaged<br />
adults participated in a standard DRM false memory task using<br />
free recall. <strong>The</strong> results showed that (1) both true and false memories<br />
increased with age, (2) true recall was higher in unilingual than in<br />
bilingual conditions for all ages, and (3) there were fewer false memories<br />
in bilingual than in unilingual conditions for the youngest children,<br />
no differences for the 7- and 12-year-olds, and among adults,<br />
more false memories in bilingual than in unilingual conditions. <strong>The</strong>se<br />
findings are discussed in the context of language organization models<br />
and bilingual memory development.<br />
57<br />
(1039)<br />
<strong>The</strong> False Recall Effect Following Multitrial Serial Learning.<br />
JOHN P. TAYLOR, KARA DESOUZA, SARA HABER, & WILLIAM<br />
P. WALLACE, University of Nevada, Reno—Lists of associates to key<br />
words produce large intrusion rates of the key words during later free<br />
recall. Participants with a well-practiced retrieval plan for a learned<br />
list should be able to exclude intrusions from recall. In the present experiment,<br />
nine lists of the 12 most frequent associates to key words<br />
(e.g., sour, candy, sugar, etc., for the key word sweet) were taken from<br />
Roediger and McDermott (1995). Three lists were presented for one,<br />
three, and eight trials each. Twenty-four participants read each word<br />
aloud, and 24 attempted to anticipate the next word in the series. Lists<br />
were cued for final recall by presenting the first word on each list. On<br />
final recall, the proportion of key-word intrusions following the eight<br />
trials of serial anticipation was .21. For all other conditions, values<br />
ranged from .44 to .49. Imposing serial order on recall over eight trials<br />
considerably reduced the intrusion rates commonly found with associate<br />
lists.<br />
(1040)<br />
Congruency Effect of Presentation Modality on Haptic, Visual,<br />
and Auditory False Memory. TOMOHIRO NABETA, Hiroshima<br />
University, KEIJI OKADA, Aichi University, & JUN KAWAHARA,<br />
Hiroshima University—False recognition of an item that is not presented<br />
(the lure) can be produced when participants study and are then<br />
tested on their recognition of a list of items related to the lure, which<br />
is not included in the list. False recognition has been shown to be reduced<br />
when the study and test modality are congruent (e.g., both visual)<br />
rather than being different (e.g., visual study and auditory test).<br />
<strong>The</strong> present study examined whether such a congruency effect occurs<br />
for visual, haptic and auditory modalities. After studying items presented<br />
haptically, visually or auditorily, participants took a recognition<br />
test in one of the three modalities. <strong>The</strong> congruency between the<br />
study and test modalities reduced false recognition when studied haptically<br />
or visually. <strong>The</strong>se results suggest that distinctive cues encoded<br />
through the haptic and visual modality help the participants to recognize<br />
the studied words more accurately, resulted in less false recognition.<br />
(1041)<br />
Memory Illusions and Repeated Testing in Children: <strong>The</strong> “Reversed”<br />
DRM Effect. ROBYN E. HOLLIDAY, University of Kent, Canterbury,<br />
TIMOTHY N. ODEGARD, University of Texas, Arlington, & CHARLES<br />
J. BRAINERD & VALERIE F. REYNA, Cornell University—<strong>The</strong><br />
Deese/Roediger–McDermott (DRM) paradigm was used to investigate<br />
the effects of an encoding manipulation (read versus generate)<br />
and a retrieval manipulation (test repetition) on 10- to 12-year-olds’<br />
true and false recognition. Children studied two blocks of four DRM<br />
lists, one “read” (i.e., whole words) and the other “self-generated”<br />
(word fragment completion). Each block was followed by either one<br />
or three recognition tests. False recognition of critical distractors was<br />
lower in the generation condition than in the read condition. <strong>The</strong>se<br />
false-memory responses were doubly dissociated by encoding condition<br />
and test repetition: Repetition increased false alarms in the read<br />
condition but decreased them in the generate condition. Such findings<br />
are consistent with fuzzy-trace theory’s opponent processes account<br />
of false memory.<br />
(1042)<br />
Dissociations in Children’s True and False Recall. MARK L. HOWE,<br />
Lancaster University—Across three experiments, the role of associative<br />
versus categorical relations in children’s veridical and false memories<br />
was examined. Children studied DRM lists or categorized word<br />
or picture lists, with or without category labels as primes. For veridical<br />
recall: (1) <strong>The</strong>re were developmental increases in recall regardless<br />
of list type, presentation modality, or priming; (2) regardless of age,<br />
categorized lists were better recalled than DRM lists, regardless of<br />
modality or priming. For false recall: (1) <strong>The</strong>re were developmental<br />
increases in recall, except for pictures; (2) no differences were pres-