Abstracts 2005 - The Psychonomic Society
Abstracts 2005 - The Psychonomic Society
Abstracts 2005 - The Psychonomic Society
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Saturday Evening Posters 5094–5099<br />
In recent years, many studies have compared perceptual or cognitive<br />
abilities between people with greater or lesser working memory capacity<br />
(span). In laboratory tests, it appears that lower span people are less<br />
efficient at suppressing irrelevant information, keeping task-specific<br />
goals in mind, and maintaining vigilance. When both groups are<br />
placed under cognitive load, these differences tend to disappear. We<br />
conducted a naturalistic experiment, with high- and low-span participants<br />
playing the game Taboo for prizes. In Taboo, a clue-giver must<br />
elicit a target word from teammates, without using the best associates<br />
as clues (“taboo” words). Using multiple indices of performance, we<br />
found that higher span people played more efficiently than lower span<br />
players. <strong>The</strong>y committed fewer Taboo errors, perseverated less often,<br />
and guessed correctly more often. This was true even in a control condition<br />
with Taboo words eliminated. <strong>The</strong> results reinforce findings<br />
from many laboratory procedures (e.g., Stroop interference, cocktail<br />
party effect, and antisaccade task).<br />
(5094)<br />
Attentional Control in Novice and Expert Baseball Batters. BROOKE<br />
CASTANEDA & ROB GRAY, Arizona State University (sponsored by<br />
Rob Gray)—This study investigated the attentional control structures<br />
involved in baseball batting. Novice and expert baseball players participated<br />
in four dual-task conditions: two that directed attention to<br />
skill execution (skill/internal [hand movement] and skill/external<br />
[bat movement]) and two that directed attention to the environment<br />
(environmental/irrelevant [tones] and environmental/relevant [ball<br />
rotation]). Temporal swing errors for experts were (1) lower for<br />
skill/external than for skill/internal and (2) lower for environmental/<br />
relevant than for environmental/irrelevant. For experts, the best batting<br />
performance was in the environmental/relevant condition. For<br />
novices, there were no significant differences in batting performance<br />
across conditions. Secondary task judgments were accurate for all<br />
conditions, suggesting that participants directed their attention to the<br />
instructed location. We conclude that experts should attend to ball rotation<br />
to achieve optimal hitting performance because it (1) does not<br />
disrupt proceduralized knowledge, (2) allows batters to effectively<br />
process the swing outcome, and (3) allows batters to utilize rotation<br />
to judge pitch speed.<br />
• MOTOR CONTROL •<br />
(5095)<br />
Tapping the Mind for Movement. ROBRECHT P. R. D. VAN DER WEL<br />
& DAVID A. ROSENBAUM, Pennsylvania State University (sponsored<br />
by David A. Rosenbaum)—Psychologists can make special contributions<br />
to the study of movement by identifying psychological determinants<br />
of movement forms. Similarly, kinesiologists can make<br />
special contributions to the study of psychology by identifying biomechanical<br />
determinants of psychological control. With this interaction<br />
in mind, we asked university students to tap targets in time with<br />
a metronome. Aspects of their performance reflected a blend of biomechanical<br />
and psychological factors. Because the psychologically<br />
driven features of their movements were similar to aspects of performance<br />
that emerge in more intellectual tasks, one may speculate that<br />
demands of movement control establish the basis for other psychological<br />
phenomena.<br />
(5096)<br />
Multiresolution Model of Human Motor Control. OH-SANG KWON,<br />
ZYGMUNT PIZLO, HOWARD N. ZELAZNIK, & GEORGE T.-C.<br />
CHIU, Purdue University (sponsored by Zygmunt Pizlo)—Multiresolution<br />
architecture is a well-established model of the human visual system.<br />
According to this model, the time it takes to judge the line of length<br />
D with accuracy d is proportional to log(D/d). Interestingly, the same<br />
function, called Fitts’s law, is used to characterize skilled motor performance,<br />
suggesting that the visual and motor systems may share the<br />
same multiresolution architecture. To verify this claim, we tested<br />
human subjects in a transfer of motor skill. In the experiment, a<br />
137<br />
trained motor skill was transferred to the task (1) where the sizes of<br />
movements remained the same but more accurate movements were required<br />
or (2) where the sizes of movements were scaled by the same<br />
factor as the required accuracy. Results showed that the degree of<br />
transfer in (2) was substantially higher than in (1), supporting the multiresolution<br />
model.<br />
(5097)<br />
Cooperative and Competitive Ideomotor Movements. ANNE<br />
HÄBERLE, GISA ASCHERSLEBEN, RAFAEL LABOISSIÈRE, &<br />
WOLFGANG PRINZ, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and<br />
Brain Sciences—Ideomotor movements occur involuntarily when we<br />
observe another person’s action. <strong>The</strong>y reflect two aspects of the observed<br />
action. Perceptually induced ideomotor movements correspond<br />
to an actually observed movement. Intentionally induced ideomotor<br />
movements relate to the action goal of the observed action. <strong>The</strong> present<br />
experiment investigated both aspects: Subjects’ finger movements<br />
were recorded while they watched on a computer screen how another<br />
person attempted to steer a ball toward its target in order to achieve a<br />
hit. Perceptually induced ideomotor movements were found to relate<br />
to the ball’s movements on the screen. Intentionally induced movements<br />
were shown to relate to the attempts to achieve a hit. When subjects<br />
had a personal interest in the observed action, their ideomotor<br />
movements were modulated by that interest. When subjects benefited<br />
from an observed hit, their ideomotor movements reflected cooperative<br />
intentions. When subjects experienced a monetary loss for an observed<br />
hit, their ideomotor movements reflected competitive intentions.<br />
(5098)<br />
Temporal Coordination of Actions and Auditory Feedback in Sequence<br />
Production. PETER Q. PFORDRESHER & BRIAN BENITEZ,<br />
University of Texas, San Antonio—Delayed auditory feedback (DAF)<br />
causes asynchronies between perception and action that disrupt production<br />
(Lee, 1950), relative to normal feedback. Varying amounts of<br />
disruption have been found for different delays. <strong>The</strong>se differences<br />
may reflect the phase location of feedback onsets, relative to produced<br />
interresponse intervals (e.g., Finney & Warren, 2003), or the absolute<br />
temporal separation between actions and sounds (e.g., MacKay,<br />
1987). Three experiments addressed this issue by observing production<br />
with traditional DAF, which uses a constant temporal separation<br />
or delays that adjust temporal separation to maintain the phase location<br />
of feedback onsets. Participants (trained pianists and nonmusicians)<br />
played simple isochronous melodies on a keyboard or tapped<br />
an isochronous beat at three production rates. Disruption was best predicted<br />
by the phase location of feedback onsets and was diminished<br />
when feedback onsets formed harmonic phase ratios (e.g., phase synchrony).<br />
<strong>The</strong>se results support the view that perception and action are<br />
coordinated in relative time.<br />
(5099)<br />
Two Modes of Sensorimotor Integration in Intention-Based and<br />
Stimulus-Based Actions. FLORIAN WASZAK, CNRS, Paris and Max<br />
Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Munich,&<br />
ARVID HERWIG & WOLFGANG PRINZ, Max Planck Institute for<br />
Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences—Human actions may be driven<br />
endogenously (to produce desired environmental effects) or exogenously<br />
(to accommodate to environmental demands). <strong>The</strong>re is a large<br />
body of evidence indicating that these two kinds of actions are controlled<br />
by different neural substrates. However, little is known about<br />
what happens—in functional terms—on these different “routes to action.”<br />
Ideomotor approaches claim that actions are selected with respect<br />
to their perceptual consequences. We report experiments that<br />
support the validity of the ideomotor principle and that, at the same<br />
time, show that it is subject to a far-reaching constraint: It holds for<br />
endogenously driven actions only. Our results suggests that the activity<br />
of the two “routes to action” is based on different types of learning:<br />
<strong>The</strong> activity of the system guiding stimulus-based actions is accompanied<br />
by stimulus–response (sensorimotor) learning, whereas