29.01.2013 Views

Abstracts 2005 - The Psychonomic Society

Abstracts 2005 - The Psychonomic Society

Abstracts 2005 - The Psychonomic Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Saturday Evening Posters 5066–5072<br />

& AGATHA LENARTOWICZ, Princeton University (sponsored by<br />

Lynn Hasher)—Participants were given two tasks at either their peak<br />

or off-peak time of day: a spatial working memory task and an implicit<br />

test for distraction presented in the context of a target task. <strong>The</strong> participants’<br />

peak times were either in the morning or in the afternoon,<br />

and they were tested either early in the day (8 a.m.–9 a.m.) or late in<br />

the afternoon (4 p.m.–5 p.m.). In accord with results reported by May,<br />

Hasher, and Foong (<strong>2005</strong>), we found that performance on our intentional<br />

task, spatial working memory, was better at peak times of day<br />

(morning for the morning types and afternoon for the evening types).<br />

<strong>The</strong> data from the implicit task showed a dramatically different pattern,<br />

with greater tacit knowledge at off-peak times of day.<br />

(5066)<br />

Memory for Unattended Stimuli in a Flanker Task. MARTIN L.<br />

BINK & JOHN L. JONES, Western Kentucky University—<strong>The</strong> flanker<br />

paradigm is used to explore the distinctions between early and late attention<br />

selection. <strong>The</strong> flanker effect occurs when unattended stimuli<br />

in a display affect the processing of target stimuli. <strong>The</strong> flanker effect<br />

suggests that the unattended stimuli are being processed in real time,<br />

but there is no suggestion about the degree to which these unattended<br />

stimuli are available to subsequent memory processes. <strong>The</strong> goal of the<br />

present study was to explore the degree to which unattended stimuli<br />

could be “remembered” in subsequent tests of implicit memory and<br />

recognition. Stimuli were first presented in a flanker task. Across<br />

three experiments, memory for the distractor items was tested using<br />

a lexical decision task (implicit test), recognition, modified recognition<br />

(explicit tests), and the process dissociation procedure. <strong>The</strong> results<br />

indicated that the to-be-ignored stimuli were nonetheless available<br />

to implicit memory processes in the subsequent memory tests.<br />

(5067)<br />

Interference as a Source of Dissociation Between Implicit and Explicit<br />

Knowledge. RICARDO TAMAYO & PETER A. FRENSCH,<br />

Humboldt University, Berlin—Two experiments tested the assumption<br />

that implicit and explicit knowledge decay at different rates due to interference.<br />

In a training phase, participants responded to letters that<br />

followed a repetitive pattern according to a finite state grammar. In<br />

the first experiment, participants were tested immediately following<br />

training and after 7 days. During each test, participants responded to<br />

old and new sequences and performed a concurrent recognition test.<br />

Priming was measured by the difference in reaction time to learned<br />

versus new items. <strong>The</strong> results of this experiment partially replicated<br />

those of Tunney (2003). In a second experiment, an interference task,<br />

in which participants were required to respond to randomly formed sequences<br />

of letters, produced results equivalent to those observed by<br />

delay. Results are discussed in terms of their implications for unitary<br />

explanations of learning.<br />

(5068)<br />

<strong>The</strong> Modulation of Consolidation by D-Amphetamine in Implicit and<br />

Explicit Sequence Learning. INGE ZEEUWS, NATACHA DEROOST,<br />

& ERIC L. L. SOETENS, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (sponsored by<br />

Eric L. L. Soetens)—D-amphetamine enhances the retention of explicitly<br />

learned verbal material (Soetens et al., 1995). Presently, we<br />

examined whether this finding can be generalized to the consolidation<br />

of implicit sequence learning. To this end, participants performed a<br />

serial reaction time (SRT) task in which they were not informed that the<br />

stimuli followed a structured sequence. <strong>The</strong> next day, participants were<br />

transferred to the initial sequence, a mirrored sequence, or a different<br />

sequence, to determine the extent to which knowledge consolidation<br />

involves abstraction of the learned material. Knowledge consolidation<br />

and abstraction were observed in implicit sequence learning, but the<br />

effect was independent of drug influence. In a second experiment, the<br />

explicitness of sequence knowledge in the SRT task was manipulated<br />

by instructions. Again, no influence of d-amphetamine was observed.<br />

Accordingly, the present results suggest that the consolidation of verbal<br />

and nonverbal material occurs differently.<br />

133<br />

(5069)<br />

Explicit Contamination in Word Stem Completion Task: A Response<br />

Time Approach. MICHEL ISINGRINI, SÉVERINE FAY, LAURENCE<br />

TACONNAT, DAVID CLARYS, & BADIÂA BOUAZZAOUI, University<br />

of Tours, & VIVIANE POUTHAS, CNRS, Paris (sponsored by<br />

Patrick Lemaire)—This experiment investigated the involvement of<br />

awareness in functional dissociations between explicit and implicit<br />

memory tests using word stems. <strong>The</strong> words were lexically or semantically<br />

studied. In the implicit condition, subjective awareness was<br />

subsequently measured on an item-by-item basis. <strong>The</strong> time taken to<br />

complete each stem was recorded. In the explicit task, semantically<br />

studied words were associated with higher levels of recall and shorter<br />

response times than were lexically studied words. In the implicit task,<br />

these effects failed to reach significance, although deep encoding<br />

made the contents of memory more accessible to awareness. Performance<br />

was slower in the explicit than in the implicit task, but in the<br />

latter condition, times to produce old words with and without awareness<br />

were comparable, and both of these responses were produced<br />

more quickly than with control words. This finding suggests that although<br />

participants may become aware in implicit paradigms, they do<br />

not adopt voluntary retrieval strategies.<br />

(5070)<br />

Impact of Positive and Anxious Moods on Alcohol-Related Cognitions<br />

in Internally Motivated Drinkers. VALERIE V. GRANT &<br />

SHERRY H. STEWART, Dalhousie University (sponsored by Raymond<br />

Klein)—We investigated the impact of musically induced positive and<br />

anxious moods on the alcohol-related cognitions of undergraduates<br />

who drink either to enhance positive mood states (EM) or to cope with<br />

anxiety (CM anxiety). Participants completed a postmood induction<br />

Stroop task that taps implicit alcohol-related cognitions. As was expected,<br />

CM-anxiety participants in the anxious mood condition maintained<br />

the tendency to show longer color-naming latencies for alcohol<br />

(vs. nonalcohol) targets following mood induction. However,<br />

contrary to our expectation, EM participants in the positive mood condition<br />

did not maintain the alcohol interference effect following mood<br />

induction. Also in accord with our hypothesis, CM-anxiety drinkers<br />

in the anxious mood condition showed increases in the strength of explicit<br />

emotional relief alcohol expectancies after the mood induction.<br />

Surprisingly, EM drinkers in the anxious condition also exhibited significant<br />

increases in the strength of explicit emotional relief (but not<br />

emotional reward) alcohol expectancies. <strong>The</strong>oretical and clinical implications<br />

of the findings will be discussed.<br />

(5071)<br />

A Benefit of Heightened Susceptibility to Distraction: An Aging<br />

Study. SUNGHAN KIM, University of Toronto, LYNN HASHER,<br />

University of Toronto and Rotman Research Institute, & ROBERT S.<br />

LOCKHART, University of Toronto—Under instructions to ignore distraction,<br />

younger and older adults read passages with interspersed distracting<br />

words. <strong>The</strong> distraction was manipulated such that some of the<br />

words could then serve as solutions to a subsequent set of verbal problems<br />

in which three weakly related words can be related by retrieving<br />

a missing fourth word (i.e., the Remote Associates Test; Mednick,<br />

1962). If older adults are less able than younger adults to regulate attention<br />

during the reading task, they might show a benefit of that distraction<br />

on the subsequent problem-solving task. And the findings are<br />

quite clear: <strong>The</strong>y are better than younger adults when the problems<br />

can be solved by distractors from the original reading task. This study<br />

shows a case in which the lack of attentional control can actually lead<br />

to superior performance.<br />

(5072)<br />

<strong>The</strong> Role of Response Competition in Age Reductions in Implicit<br />

Memory Performance. LISA GERACI, Texas A&M University, &<br />

MARYELLEN HAMILTON, Saint Peter’s College—Implicit memory<br />

performance is sometimes reduced in older adults, as compared with<br />

younger adults. <strong>The</strong>se age reductions in performance have been ex-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!