Abstracts 2005 - The Psychonomic Society
Abstracts 2005 - The Psychonomic Society
Abstracts 2005 - The Psychonomic Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Saturday Evening Posters 5066–5072<br />
& AGATHA LENARTOWICZ, Princeton University (sponsored by<br />
Lynn Hasher)—Participants were given two tasks at either their peak<br />
or off-peak time of day: a spatial working memory task and an implicit<br />
test for distraction presented in the context of a target task. <strong>The</strong> participants’<br />
peak times were either in the morning or in the afternoon,<br />
and they were tested either early in the day (8 a.m.–9 a.m.) or late in<br />
the afternoon (4 p.m.–5 p.m.). In accord with results reported by May,<br />
Hasher, and Foong (<strong>2005</strong>), we found that performance on our intentional<br />
task, spatial working memory, was better at peak times of day<br />
(morning for the morning types and afternoon for the evening types).<br />
<strong>The</strong> data from the implicit task showed a dramatically different pattern,<br />
with greater tacit knowledge at off-peak times of day.<br />
(5066)<br />
Memory for Unattended Stimuli in a Flanker Task. MARTIN L.<br />
BINK & JOHN L. JONES, Western Kentucky University—<strong>The</strong> flanker<br />
paradigm is used to explore the distinctions between early and late attention<br />
selection. <strong>The</strong> flanker effect occurs when unattended stimuli<br />
in a display affect the processing of target stimuli. <strong>The</strong> flanker effect<br />
suggests that the unattended stimuli are being processed in real time,<br />
but there is no suggestion about the degree to which these unattended<br />
stimuli are available to subsequent memory processes. <strong>The</strong> goal of the<br />
present study was to explore the degree to which unattended stimuli<br />
could be “remembered” in subsequent tests of implicit memory and<br />
recognition. Stimuli were first presented in a flanker task. Across<br />
three experiments, memory for the distractor items was tested using<br />
a lexical decision task (implicit test), recognition, modified recognition<br />
(explicit tests), and the process dissociation procedure. <strong>The</strong> results<br />
indicated that the to-be-ignored stimuli were nonetheless available<br />
to implicit memory processes in the subsequent memory tests.<br />
(5067)<br />
Interference as a Source of Dissociation Between Implicit and Explicit<br />
Knowledge. RICARDO TAMAYO & PETER A. FRENSCH,<br />
Humboldt University, Berlin—Two experiments tested the assumption<br />
that implicit and explicit knowledge decay at different rates due to interference.<br />
In a training phase, participants responded to letters that<br />
followed a repetitive pattern according to a finite state grammar. In<br />
the first experiment, participants were tested immediately following<br />
training and after 7 days. During each test, participants responded to<br />
old and new sequences and performed a concurrent recognition test.<br />
Priming was measured by the difference in reaction time to learned<br />
versus new items. <strong>The</strong> results of this experiment partially replicated<br />
those of Tunney (2003). In a second experiment, an interference task,<br />
in which participants were required to respond to randomly formed sequences<br />
of letters, produced results equivalent to those observed by<br />
delay. Results are discussed in terms of their implications for unitary<br />
explanations of learning.<br />
(5068)<br />
<strong>The</strong> Modulation of Consolidation by D-Amphetamine in Implicit and<br />
Explicit Sequence Learning. INGE ZEEUWS, NATACHA DEROOST,<br />
& ERIC L. L. SOETENS, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (sponsored by<br />
Eric L. L. Soetens)—D-amphetamine enhances the retention of explicitly<br />
learned verbal material (Soetens et al., 1995). Presently, we<br />
examined whether this finding can be generalized to the consolidation<br />
of implicit sequence learning. To this end, participants performed a<br />
serial reaction time (SRT) task in which they were not informed that the<br />
stimuli followed a structured sequence. <strong>The</strong> next day, participants were<br />
transferred to the initial sequence, a mirrored sequence, or a different<br />
sequence, to determine the extent to which knowledge consolidation<br />
involves abstraction of the learned material. Knowledge consolidation<br />
and abstraction were observed in implicit sequence learning, but the<br />
effect was independent of drug influence. In a second experiment, the<br />
explicitness of sequence knowledge in the SRT task was manipulated<br />
by instructions. Again, no influence of d-amphetamine was observed.<br />
Accordingly, the present results suggest that the consolidation of verbal<br />
and nonverbal material occurs differently.<br />
133<br />
(5069)<br />
Explicit Contamination in Word Stem Completion Task: A Response<br />
Time Approach. MICHEL ISINGRINI, SÉVERINE FAY, LAURENCE<br />
TACONNAT, DAVID CLARYS, & BADIÂA BOUAZZAOUI, University<br />
of Tours, & VIVIANE POUTHAS, CNRS, Paris (sponsored by<br />
Patrick Lemaire)—This experiment investigated the involvement of<br />
awareness in functional dissociations between explicit and implicit<br />
memory tests using word stems. <strong>The</strong> words were lexically or semantically<br />
studied. In the implicit condition, subjective awareness was<br />
subsequently measured on an item-by-item basis. <strong>The</strong> time taken to<br />
complete each stem was recorded. In the explicit task, semantically<br />
studied words were associated with higher levels of recall and shorter<br />
response times than were lexically studied words. In the implicit task,<br />
these effects failed to reach significance, although deep encoding<br />
made the contents of memory more accessible to awareness. Performance<br />
was slower in the explicit than in the implicit task, but in the<br />
latter condition, times to produce old words with and without awareness<br />
were comparable, and both of these responses were produced<br />
more quickly than with control words. This finding suggests that although<br />
participants may become aware in implicit paradigms, they do<br />
not adopt voluntary retrieval strategies.<br />
(5070)<br />
Impact of Positive and Anxious Moods on Alcohol-Related Cognitions<br />
in Internally Motivated Drinkers. VALERIE V. GRANT &<br />
SHERRY H. STEWART, Dalhousie University (sponsored by Raymond<br />
Klein)—We investigated the impact of musically induced positive and<br />
anxious moods on the alcohol-related cognitions of undergraduates<br />
who drink either to enhance positive mood states (EM) or to cope with<br />
anxiety (CM anxiety). Participants completed a postmood induction<br />
Stroop task that taps implicit alcohol-related cognitions. As was expected,<br />
CM-anxiety participants in the anxious mood condition maintained<br />
the tendency to show longer color-naming latencies for alcohol<br />
(vs. nonalcohol) targets following mood induction. However,<br />
contrary to our expectation, EM participants in the positive mood condition<br />
did not maintain the alcohol interference effect following mood<br />
induction. Also in accord with our hypothesis, CM-anxiety drinkers<br />
in the anxious mood condition showed increases in the strength of explicit<br />
emotional relief alcohol expectancies after the mood induction.<br />
Surprisingly, EM drinkers in the anxious condition also exhibited significant<br />
increases in the strength of explicit emotional relief (but not<br />
emotional reward) alcohol expectancies. <strong>The</strong>oretical and clinical implications<br />
of the findings will be discussed.<br />
(5071)<br />
A Benefit of Heightened Susceptibility to Distraction: An Aging<br />
Study. SUNGHAN KIM, University of Toronto, LYNN HASHER,<br />
University of Toronto and Rotman Research Institute, & ROBERT S.<br />
LOCKHART, University of Toronto—Under instructions to ignore distraction,<br />
younger and older adults read passages with interspersed distracting<br />
words. <strong>The</strong> distraction was manipulated such that some of the<br />
words could then serve as solutions to a subsequent set of verbal problems<br />
in which three weakly related words can be related by retrieving<br />
a missing fourth word (i.e., the Remote Associates Test; Mednick,<br />
1962). If older adults are less able than younger adults to regulate attention<br />
during the reading task, they might show a benefit of that distraction<br />
on the subsequent problem-solving task. And the findings are<br />
quite clear: <strong>The</strong>y are better than younger adults when the problems<br />
can be solved by distractors from the original reading task. This study<br />
shows a case in which the lack of attentional control can actually lead<br />
to superior performance.<br />
(5072)<br />
<strong>The</strong> Role of Response Competition in Age Reductions in Implicit<br />
Memory Performance. LISA GERACI, Texas A&M University, &<br />
MARYELLEN HAMILTON, Saint Peter’s College—Implicit memory<br />
performance is sometimes reduced in older adults, as compared with<br />
younger adults. <strong>The</strong>se age reductions in performance have been ex-