Abstracts 2005 - The Psychonomic Society
Abstracts 2005 - The Psychonomic Society
Abstracts 2005 - The Psychonomic Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Posters 4113–4120 Saturday Noon<br />
(4113)<br />
Perception of Age in Human Faces. PATRICIA A. COSTELLO, Gustavus<br />
Adolphus College, & TRACY L. CLEVELAND & SETH M.<br />
LANGEVIN, Bradley University—Faces convey a substantial amount<br />
of information about their owners, including emotional state, gender,<br />
and age. Perception of age plays an important role in how we interact<br />
socially with others. This study seeks to understand how people’s age<br />
and gender influence age judgment of an unknown face. <strong>The</strong> study<br />
also examines the effect of exposure time on the judgment about a<br />
face’s age. Younger subjects (college age) viewed male and female<br />
faces ranging from 20 to 80 years old for 100 msec and estimated how<br />
old each face was. Older subjects (55–85) viewed faces for 3 sec and<br />
also estimated how old each face was. All subjects also categorized<br />
the faces as “young” or “old.” Both the younger and the older subjects<br />
were more accurate for their own age groups, but younger subjects<br />
tended to underestimate faces from older age groups and older subjects<br />
tended to underestimate younger age groups.<br />
(4114)<br />
Revisiting the Chicago–Rome Effect. CATHERINE MELLO &<br />
MICHÈLE ROBERT, Université de Montrèal—Examination of biases<br />
in location estimates has led some authors (Friedman & Brown, 2000;<br />
Friedman, Kerkman, & Brown, 2002) to think that North America,<br />
Europe, and Africa were organized in distinct subjective units. <strong>The</strong><br />
present study assesses the biases existing in relative location judgments<br />
for pairs of Old and New World cities belonging to different<br />
subjective subregions. Sixty undergraduate students from Québec provided<br />
28 location estimates, using a compass. Overall, their answers<br />
were biased, as predicted, from previous studies. However, analyzing<br />
individual items suggests that the subjective geography of these participants<br />
may differ from that of the prior Albertan and American samples.<br />
<strong>The</strong> present participants seem to align the United States with<br />
southern Europe and northern Africa and do not appear to conceptualize<br />
northern Europe as a whole. Since such distortions in geographical<br />
representations cannot be explained by climate considerations,<br />
the role of various categorical cues needs to be investigated.<br />
(4115)<br />
Influence of Task Rule on the MARC Effect. YANG SEOK CHO,<br />
Korea University, & ROBERT W. PROCTOR, Purdue University—<br />
<strong>The</strong> MARC effect is that performance is better when an even number<br />
is mapped to the right response and an odd number to the left response<br />
than when the mapping is opposite. Two experiments examined the effect<br />
of task rule on the MARC effect. In Experiment 1, participants<br />
made left–right keypresses to Arabic numerals 3, 4, 8, and 9 with the<br />
odd–even classification rule or with a multiple-of-3-or-not rule. <strong>The</strong><br />
MARC effect was evident with the odd–even rule, whereas a reverse<br />
MARC effect was obtained with the multiple-of-3-or-not rule. However,<br />
the SNARC effect (left response faster for small numbers and<br />
right response for large numbers) was not influenced by task rule. In<br />
Experiment 2, in which the stimuli were Arabic numbers or number<br />
words, the same result pattern was obtained for both stimulus modes.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se results suggest that the MARC effect is due to a coding asymmetry<br />
determined by task rule.<br />
(4116)<br />
<strong>The</strong>matic Relations and Individual Differences in the Noninversion<br />
of Similarity and Difference. SABRINA G. SIMMONS & ZACHARY<br />
ESTES, University of Georgia (sponsored by Zachary Estes)—We investigated<br />
the role of thematic relations in the apprehension of similarity<br />
and difference, and we identified systematic individual differences<br />
in the perception of similarity. Although traditional models<br />
construe similarity as a weighted function of common and distinctive<br />
features (Tversky, 1977), recent evidence suggests that thematic relations<br />
also influence perceived similarity (Wisniewski & Bassok,<br />
1999). That is, related items (milk–coffee) are judged more similar<br />
than unrelated items (milk–lemonade). Experiment 1 revealed that<br />
thematic relations affect similarity more than difference (the nonin-<br />
122<br />
version effect). Experiment 2 eliminated this noninversion effect by<br />
instructing participants to ignore relations. Experiment 3 used a prescreening<br />
task (Is dog more similar to cat or bone?) to distinguish<br />
relation-dominant participants (bone) from feature-dominant participants<br />
(cat). Relation-dominant participants exhibited the noninversion<br />
effect, whereas feature-dominant participants did not. Results suggest<br />
that the noninversion of similarity and difference is attributable to thematic<br />
relations, and is subject to individual differences.<br />
(4117)<br />
Bidirectional Relatedness Norms: Comparisons With Associability<br />
and Latency Measures. HARRIETT AMSTER & DAVID S. GORFEIN,<br />
University of Texas, Arlington, & KIMBERLY K. WEAR, High Point<br />
University—Rated relatedness ratings were obtained for word pairs<br />
that were of three types: (1) members of the same category (e.g.,<br />
ruby–emerald), (2) associatively related as primary (e.g., black–white)<br />
or secondary (e.g., black–dark), and (3) assorted relationships, including<br />
homographs paired with related nonhomograph responses to<br />
each of two meanings of the homograph (e.g., bat–baseball; bat–rat).<br />
<strong>The</strong> ratings for relatedness were obtained in both the forward and the<br />
backward directions.<br />
• MATHEMATICAL COGNITION AND PROBLEM SOLVING •<br />
(4118)<br />
All Mixed Up: <strong>The</strong> Effect of Numeral Format on Single-Digit Addition<br />
and Multiplication Performance. JO-ANNE LEFEVRE &<br />
MARCIE PENNER-WILGER, Carleton University—How does numeral<br />
format affect calculation? University students (n = 40) solved<br />
single-digit problems in either addition or multiplication in digit format<br />
(e.g., 2 + 3), word format (e.g., two + three), and mixed format<br />
(e.g., 2 + three; two + 3). Participants reported their solution methods.<br />
For addition, participants took longer to solve mixed than digit<br />
problems and longer to solve word than mixed problems. Participants<br />
also reported using retrieval less frequently for word than for digit<br />
problems. <strong>The</strong>re was a problem size effect for all dependent measures,<br />
but no format � size interaction for addition. For multiplication, participants<br />
were slower to solve word than mixed or digit problems.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re was a problem size effect for all dependent measures, and there<br />
was a format � size interaction such that the problem size effect was<br />
greater for digit than for mixed or word problems. Implications for<br />
theories of arithmetic performance are discussed.<br />
(4119)<br />
Effects of Numerical Surface Form on Performance of Simple Arithmetic<br />
Rules. JAMIE I. CAMPBELL & ARRON W. METCALFE, University<br />
of Saskatchewan—Adults performed simple, rule-based arithmetic<br />
problems (N + 0 = N, N � 1= N, N � 0 = 0) composed of Arabic<br />
digits (5 � 1; 0 + 4) or written English number words (five � one;<br />
zero + four). With Arabic digits, N � 0 = 0 was relatively slow, compared<br />
with the other zero and one problems, and there was a high rate of<br />
N � 0= N errors. In contrast, with word stimuli, N � 0 items were<br />
relatively fast and yielded a low rate of N � 0= N errors. <strong>The</strong>se<br />
format-related differences imply that Arabic digits generated more interrule<br />
confusion than did number words. <strong>The</strong>se findings provide additional<br />
evidence that numeral-encoding mechanisms and central<br />
mechanisms for calculation can be interactive, rather than strictly additive,<br />
processes.<br />
(4120)<br />
Assessing Students’ Mathematics Learning. PATRICIA BAGGETT,<br />
New Mexico State University, & ANDRZEJ EHRENFEUCHT, University<br />
of Colorado, Boulder—In the United States, in conjunction with<br />
state and national standards, as well as NCLB evaluations of schools,<br />
methods of assessment and their uses are hotly discussed. Most assessment<br />
instruments rely heavily on multiple choice questions and short answers<br />
and are also cumulative, covering many topics only briefly. We<br />
are experimenting with a different paradigm. Students are taught a