Abstracts 2005 - The Psychonomic Society
Abstracts 2005 - The Psychonomic Society
Abstracts 2005 - The Psychonomic Society
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Friday Evening Posters 3120–3122<br />
we tested the hypothesis that context-specific gender–emotion schemata<br />
affect judgments of witness credibility. Participants listened to the testimony<br />
of either a male or a female witness displaying one of three<br />
emotional states in one of two contexts (character witness, eyewitness)<br />
and judged the credibility of the witness. Results indicated that different<br />
combinations of factors affected judgments in the two witness contexts.<br />
<strong>The</strong> findings highlight the contribution of gender–emotion–<br />
context schemata to judgments in forensic contexts.<br />
(3120)<br />
Representation in Decision Making: Individuation Affects Sensitivity<br />
to Relative Considerations. DANIEL M. BARTELS, Northwestern<br />
University, & RUSSELL C. BURNETT, Hebrew University of Jerusalem<br />
(sponsored by Douglas L. Medin)—Decisions often permit absolute<br />
and relative considerations, and these may favor different choices.<br />
Consider deciding between saving 60 of 240 lives at risk and saving<br />
50 of 100 lives. <strong>The</strong> first maximizes absolute number saved; the second,<br />
proportion saved. Although sometimes nonnormative, people<br />
often base decisions such as these partly on relative considerations.<br />
We aim to explain this effect in cognitive terms, proposing that one<br />
determinant of the weights given to absolute and relative considerations<br />
is the degree to which resources are construed as individuals versus<br />
collections. We report several studies in which construal of resources<br />
was manipulated via perceptual triggers such as independent<br />
versus joint motion (which has been shown to promote construal as<br />
individuals vs. collections). Relative considerations were less influential<br />
when resources were construed as individuals, but this effect<br />
was moderated by framing (gains vs. losses) and by another perceptual<br />
factor (whether objects appeared discrete).<br />
(3121)<br />
Triplet Triangulator Calculator: Displays Data Triplets in a Triangle.<br />
ROBERT M. HAMM, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences<br />
Center—Many data sets include partitions into three categories: A, B,<br />
105<br />
and C. Readily available displays compare pairs of categories, such as<br />
A versus B or C, thus making some relations easier to see than others.<br />
Graphing a triplet of numbers (0 < A, B, C < 1; C = 1 � A � B)<br />
as a point in an equilateral triangle, using trilinear coordinates allows<br />
consideration of all relations, unbiased except for up/down and<br />
left/right perceptual preferences. An Excel calculator (TripTria.xls at<br />
http://www.fammed.ouhsc.edu/robhamm/cdmcalc.htm) produces<br />
such plots. Application to the following types of data is demonstrated:<br />
(1) allocations of time among three activities, (2) strength of preference<br />
among three options, (3) distribution of test responses among<br />
“right,” “wrong,” and “don’t know.” It is proposed that this display<br />
may enhance readers’ comprehension and recall of triplets of data and<br />
may facilitate decision making when there are three options and when<br />
outcomes are continent upon three possible events.<br />
(3122)<br />
Extending the SNARC Effect: Spatial Components in the Mental<br />
Representations of Numbers, Symbols, and Percepts. SAMUEL<br />
SHAKI, College of Judea and Samaria, & WILLIAM M. PETRUSIC,<br />
Carleton University (sponsored by William M. Petrusic)—In each of<br />
four experiments requiring pairwise comparative judgments, SNARC<br />
effects were obtained. With comparison of the numerical magnitude<br />
of pairs of positive numbers, response times (RTs) were shorter with<br />
the left hand than with the right when the numbers were small, but<br />
they were longer with the left hand than with the right when the numbers<br />
were relatively large. This effect was obtained both with the instruction<br />
to select the smaller digit in the pair and with that to select<br />
the larger digit in the pair. Symbolic comparisons with perceptual referents<br />
(e.g., size of animals) and comparisons with stimuli on a perceptual<br />
continuum (visual extent) showed an instruction-dependent<br />
SNARC effect. With the instruction to select the stimulus lower on the<br />
underlying attribute, SNARC effects typically obtained with numbers<br />
occurred. However, with the instruction to select the stimulus higher<br />
on the attribute, reverse SNARC effects were obtained.