29.01.2013 Views

Abstracts 2005 - The Psychonomic Society

Abstracts 2005 - The Psychonomic Society

Abstracts 2005 - The Psychonomic Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Friday Evening Posters 3120–3122<br />

we tested the hypothesis that context-specific gender–emotion schemata<br />

affect judgments of witness credibility. Participants listened to the testimony<br />

of either a male or a female witness displaying one of three<br />

emotional states in one of two contexts (character witness, eyewitness)<br />

and judged the credibility of the witness. Results indicated that different<br />

combinations of factors affected judgments in the two witness contexts.<br />

<strong>The</strong> findings highlight the contribution of gender–emotion–<br />

context schemata to judgments in forensic contexts.<br />

(3120)<br />

Representation in Decision Making: Individuation Affects Sensitivity<br />

to Relative Considerations. DANIEL M. BARTELS, Northwestern<br />

University, & RUSSELL C. BURNETT, Hebrew University of Jerusalem<br />

(sponsored by Douglas L. Medin)—Decisions often permit absolute<br />

and relative considerations, and these may favor different choices.<br />

Consider deciding between saving 60 of 240 lives at risk and saving<br />

50 of 100 lives. <strong>The</strong> first maximizes absolute number saved; the second,<br />

proportion saved. Although sometimes nonnormative, people<br />

often base decisions such as these partly on relative considerations.<br />

We aim to explain this effect in cognitive terms, proposing that one<br />

determinant of the weights given to absolute and relative considerations<br />

is the degree to which resources are construed as individuals versus<br />

collections. We report several studies in which construal of resources<br />

was manipulated via perceptual triggers such as independent<br />

versus joint motion (which has been shown to promote construal as<br />

individuals vs. collections). Relative considerations were less influential<br />

when resources were construed as individuals, but this effect<br />

was moderated by framing (gains vs. losses) and by another perceptual<br />

factor (whether objects appeared discrete).<br />

(3121)<br />

Triplet Triangulator Calculator: Displays Data Triplets in a Triangle.<br />

ROBERT M. HAMM, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences<br />

Center—Many data sets include partitions into three categories: A, B,<br />

105<br />

and C. Readily available displays compare pairs of categories, such as<br />

A versus B or C, thus making some relations easier to see than others.<br />

Graphing a triplet of numbers (0 < A, B, C < 1; C = 1 � A � B)<br />

as a point in an equilateral triangle, using trilinear coordinates allows<br />

consideration of all relations, unbiased except for up/down and<br />

left/right perceptual preferences. An Excel calculator (TripTria.xls at<br />

http://www.fammed.ouhsc.edu/robhamm/cdmcalc.htm) produces<br />

such plots. Application to the following types of data is demonstrated:<br />

(1) allocations of time among three activities, (2) strength of preference<br />

among three options, (3) distribution of test responses among<br />

“right,” “wrong,” and “don’t know.” It is proposed that this display<br />

may enhance readers’ comprehension and recall of triplets of data and<br />

may facilitate decision making when there are three options and when<br />

outcomes are continent upon three possible events.<br />

(3122)<br />

Extending the SNARC Effect: Spatial Components in the Mental<br />

Representations of Numbers, Symbols, and Percepts. SAMUEL<br />

SHAKI, College of Judea and Samaria, & WILLIAM M. PETRUSIC,<br />

Carleton University (sponsored by William M. Petrusic)—In each of<br />

four experiments requiring pairwise comparative judgments, SNARC<br />

effects were obtained. With comparison of the numerical magnitude<br />

of pairs of positive numbers, response times (RTs) were shorter with<br />

the left hand than with the right when the numbers were small, but<br />

they were longer with the left hand than with the right when the numbers<br />

were relatively large. This effect was obtained both with the instruction<br />

to select the smaller digit in the pair and with that to select<br />

the larger digit in the pair. Symbolic comparisons with perceptual referents<br />

(e.g., size of animals) and comparisons with stimuli on a perceptual<br />

continuum (visual extent) showed an instruction-dependent<br />

SNARC effect. With the instruction to select the stimulus lower on the<br />

underlying attribute, SNARC effects typically obtained with numbers<br />

occurred. However, with the instruction to select the stimulus higher<br />

on the attribute, reverse SNARC effects were obtained.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!