S1 (FriAM 1-65) - The Psychonomic Society
S1 (FriAM 1-65) - The Psychonomic Society
S1 (FriAM 1-65) - The Psychonomic Society
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Posters 3016–3022 Friday Evening<br />
paired communicative efficiency more for interactions involving tangrams<br />
than for those involving caricatures. For older adults, the effect<br />
of seeing the partner was particularly pronounced. Direct evidence for<br />
the use of visual availability was obtained by examining patterns of<br />
mutual gaze.<br />
• SEMANTIC PROCESSING OF WORDS •<br />
(3016)<br />
Measuring Semantic Satiation With a Categorical Matching Task.<br />
XING TIAN, University of Maryland, College Park, & DAVID E.<br />
HUBER, University of California, San Diego (sponsored by David E.<br />
Huber)—In the subjective experience of semantic satiation, the sense<br />
of meaning for a repeated word is progressively lost. However, semantic<br />
satiation has proven difficult to measure empirically. Using a<br />
category–exemplar speeded matching task, we developed a technique<br />
that reliably demonstrates an initial speed-up, followed by a later<br />
slow-down when responding to repeated occurrences of the same category<br />
label (e.g., MAMMAL), which was paired with novel exemplars<br />
from trial to trial (e.g., HORSE for match or APPLE for mismatch). This<br />
was achieved within a mixed list of 20 trials that contained 10 repetitions<br />
of the same category label and 10 trials with other category labels.<br />
<strong>The</strong> transition from faster to slower responding occurred both for<br />
match and mismatch trials. Two follow-up experiments used the same<br />
design but with exemplar–exemplar and word–word matching to determine<br />
how much of this effect is due to repetitions of meaning versus<br />
repetitions of orthography.<br />
(3017)<br />
Multiple, Multiple Primes and the Elimination and/or Reversal of<br />
Repetition Priming. JENNIFER H. COANE & DAVID A. BALOTA,<br />
Washington University (sponsored by David A. Balota)—In two experiments,<br />
we explored the functional relationship between the number<br />
and type of related primes and lexical activation of targets. On<br />
each trial, embedded within a 12-item list, 0 to 12 semantically/<br />
associatively and/or orthographically/phonologically related primes<br />
preceded (250 msec/item) a single target for speeded pronunciation.<br />
On half of the trials, the target was embedded among the primes to assess<br />
repetition priming. Facilitatory repetition priming occurred when<br />
all other primes were unrelated. An interaction between repetition and<br />
semantic priming indicated that repetition priming was eliminated<br />
when six or more related primes preceded the target. Form priming<br />
and repetition priming yielded interactive, albeit inhibitory, effects:<br />
Repetition suppression was obtained for phonologically related lists.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se results indicate that semantically related primes can produce asymptotic<br />
levels of activation (thereby eliminating the standard repetition<br />
priming effect), and form-related and repetition primes synergistically<br />
produce inhibition (thereby reversing the standard repetition<br />
priming effect).<br />
(3018)<br />
Decay of Automatic Semantic Priming From Visible Unidentifiable<br />
Primes in an RSVP Task. PATRICK A. O’CONNOR, JAMES H.<br />
NEELY, & JIAH PEARSON-LEARY, University at Albany—<strong>The</strong>re is<br />
little direct evidence supporting the commonly held belief that semantic<br />
activation decays within 500–700 msec. In three RSVP experiments<br />
in which visible primes, which were not to be reported, occurred<br />
either 80, 240, 720, or 1,360 msec before the to-be-reported<br />
target’s onset, semantic priming was consistently significant at the 80and<br />
240-msec delays and never significant at the 1,360-msec delay.<br />
Thus, automatic activation may last 720 msec but decays to nonsignificant<br />
levels by 1,320 msec.<br />
(3019)<br />
Examining the Coarse Coding Hypothesis: Evidence From Summation<br />
Priming of Lexically Ambiguous and Unambiguous Targets.<br />
PADMAPRIYA KANDHADAI & KARA D. FEDERMEIER, University<br />
of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign—<strong>The</strong> coarse coding hypothe-<br />
89<br />
sis postulates that meaning activation is focused in the left hemisphere<br />
(LH) but broad and weak in the right (RH). Consistent with coarse<br />
coding, some studies report an RH benefit for activating multiple<br />
meanings of lexically ambiguous words; however, others have failed<br />
to find an RH benefit for processing distantly linked unambiguous<br />
words. To address this issue, the present study employed a summationpriming<br />
paradigm: Two primes converged onto an unambiguous, lexically<br />
associated target (LION–STRIPES–TIGER) or diverged onto different<br />
meanings of an ambiguous target (KIDNEY–PIANO–ORGAN).<br />
Participants made lexical decisions to targets or made a semantic relatedness<br />
judgment between primes and targets. In both tasks, for both<br />
triplet types, we found equivalent behavioral priming strengths and<br />
patterns across the two visual fields, counter to the predictions of<br />
coarse coding. Follow-up ERP studies also fail to support coarse coding,<br />
while pointing to other types of hemispheric differences in word<br />
processing.<br />
(3020)<br />
<strong>The</strong> Impact of Target Neighbors in Semantic Priming. YASUSHI<br />
HINO, YUU KUSUNOSE, & RURIKA NAKASHIMA, Waseda University,<br />
& STEPHEN J. LUPKER, University of Western Ontario—<br />
Recent results suggest that, when reading a word, the meanings of its<br />
orthographic neighbors are activated. For example, Bourassa and<br />
Besner (1998) reported a priming effect in lexical decision when an<br />
orthographic neighbor of a masked nonword prime was related to the<br />
target. In our experiments, we investigated the impact of the meanings<br />
of the target’s neighbors in lexical decision tasks with masked and unmasked<br />
primes. Lexical decision performance for katakana word targets<br />
was compared in two conditions: when a target neighbor (e.g.,<br />
rocket) was related to the prime (e.g., missile–POCKET) and when no<br />
target neighbors were related to the prime (e.g., school–POCKET). In<br />
addition, in order to evaluate the locus of the effect, we also manipulated<br />
the relatedness proportion. <strong>The</strong> results support the conclusions<br />
that the meanings of target neighbors are activated and the impact of<br />
this activation can be affected by relatedness proportion.<br />
(3021)<br />
<strong>The</strong> Effects of Cross-Language Activation on Bilingual Lexical<br />
Disambiguation. ANA I. SCHWARTZ & LI-HAO YEH, University of<br />
Texas, El Paso—<strong>The</strong> present study examined whether cross-language<br />
activation influences bilinguals’ processing of lexical ambiguity.<br />
Highly proficient Spanish–English bilinguals performed a semantic<br />
verification task in which sentence frames were followed by the presentation<br />
of the final word of the sentence (the prime word). Participants<br />
then decided whether a follow-up target word was related to the<br />
meaning of the sentence. On critical trials, the sentences ended in a<br />
semantically ambiguous word that was either a cognate with Spanish<br />
(e.g., novel) or a noncognate control (e.g., fast). <strong>The</strong> preceding sentence<br />
context biased the subordinate meaning, and targets were related<br />
to the irrelevant, dominant meaning (e.g., BOOK; SPEED). Mean reaction<br />
times and error rates were greater when the prime words were ambiguous<br />
cognates, suggesting that the semantic representations from<br />
the native language were coactivated and increased the competition<br />
from the shared, dominant meaning. Implications for current models<br />
of reading are discussed.<br />
• SPEECH PERCEPTION •<br />
(3022)<br />
<strong>The</strong> Time Course and Nature of Listeners’ Sensitivity to Indexical<br />
Information During Word Recognition. MOLLY ROBINSON & BOB<br />
MCMURRAY, University of Iowa (sponsored by Shaun P. Vecera)—<br />
Word recognition is sensitive to noncontrastive acoustic detail such as<br />
speaker identity. Episodic models explain this with lexical entries defined<br />
by exemplars that include speaker-specific and phonetic codes.<br />
Alternatively, such effects could arise from a purely phonetic lexicon<br />
if recognition was calibrated to voices (normalization). <strong>The</strong>se models<br />
were distinguished in a series of visual world experiments. <strong>The</strong> pri-