29.01.2013 Views

S1 (FriAM 1-65) - The Psychonomic Society

S1 (FriAM 1-65) - The Psychonomic Society

S1 (FriAM 1-65) - The Psychonomic Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Posters 3016–3022 Friday Evening<br />

paired communicative efficiency more for interactions involving tangrams<br />

than for those involving caricatures. For older adults, the effect<br />

of seeing the partner was particularly pronounced. Direct evidence for<br />

the use of visual availability was obtained by examining patterns of<br />

mutual gaze.<br />

• SEMANTIC PROCESSING OF WORDS •<br />

(3016)<br />

Measuring Semantic Satiation With a Categorical Matching Task.<br />

XING TIAN, University of Maryland, College Park, & DAVID E.<br />

HUBER, University of California, San Diego (sponsored by David E.<br />

Huber)—In the subjective experience of semantic satiation, the sense<br />

of meaning for a repeated word is progressively lost. However, semantic<br />

satiation has proven difficult to measure empirically. Using a<br />

category–exemplar speeded matching task, we developed a technique<br />

that reliably demonstrates an initial speed-up, followed by a later<br />

slow-down when responding to repeated occurrences of the same category<br />

label (e.g., MAMMAL), which was paired with novel exemplars<br />

from trial to trial (e.g., HORSE for match or APPLE for mismatch). This<br />

was achieved within a mixed list of 20 trials that contained 10 repetitions<br />

of the same category label and 10 trials with other category labels.<br />

<strong>The</strong> transition from faster to slower responding occurred both for<br />

match and mismatch trials. Two follow-up experiments used the same<br />

design but with exemplar–exemplar and word–word matching to determine<br />

how much of this effect is due to repetitions of meaning versus<br />

repetitions of orthography.<br />

(3017)<br />

Multiple, Multiple Primes and the Elimination and/or Reversal of<br />

Repetition Priming. JENNIFER H. COANE & DAVID A. BALOTA,<br />

Washington University (sponsored by David A. Balota)—In two experiments,<br />

we explored the functional relationship between the number<br />

and type of related primes and lexical activation of targets. On<br />

each trial, embedded within a 12-item list, 0 to 12 semantically/<br />

associatively and/or orthographically/phonologically related primes<br />

preceded (250 msec/item) a single target for speeded pronunciation.<br />

On half of the trials, the target was embedded among the primes to assess<br />

repetition priming. Facilitatory repetition priming occurred when<br />

all other primes were unrelated. An interaction between repetition and<br />

semantic priming indicated that repetition priming was eliminated<br />

when six or more related primes preceded the target. Form priming<br />

and repetition priming yielded interactive, albeit inhibitory, effects:<br />

Repetition suppression was obtained for phonologically related lists.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se results indicate that semantically related primes can produce asymptotic<br />

levels of activation (thereby eliminating the standard repetition<br />

priming effect), and form-related and repetition primes synergistically<br />

produce inhibition (thereby reversing the standard repetition<br />

priming effect).<br />

(3018)<br />

Decay of Automatic Semantic Priming From Visible Unidentifiable<br />

Primes in an RSVP Task. PATRICK A. O’CONNOR, JAMES H.<br />

NEELY, & JIAH PEARSON-LEARY, University at Albany—<strong>The</strong>re is<br />

little direct evidence supporting the commonly held belief that semantic<br />

activation decays within 500–700 msec. In three RSVP experiments<br />

in which visible primes, which were not to be reported, occurred<br />

either 80, 240, 720, or 1,360 msec before the to-be-reported<br />

target’s onset, semantic priming was consistently significant at the 80and<br />

240-msec delays and never significant at the 1,360-msec delay.<br />

Thus, automatic activation may last 720 msec but decays to nonsignificant<br />

levels by 1,320 msec.<br />

(3019)<br />

Examining the Coarse Coding Hypothesis: Evidence From Summation<br />

Priming of Lexically Ambiguous and Unambiguous Targets.<br />

PADMAPRIYA KANDHADAI & KARA D. FEDERMEIER, University<br />

of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign—<strong>The</strong> coarse coding hypothe-<br />

89<br />

sis postulates that meaning activation is focused in the left hemisphere<br />

(LH) but broad and weak in the right (RH). Consistent with coarse<br />

coding, some studies report an RH benefit for activating multiple<br />

meanings of lexically ambiguous words; however, others have failed<br />

to find an RH benefit for processing distantly linked unambiguous<br />

words. To address this issue, the present study employed a summationpriming<br />

paradigm: Two primes converged onto an unambiguous, lexically<br />

associated target (LION–STRIPES–TIGER) or diverged onto different<br />

meanings of an ambiguous target (KIDNEY–PIANO–ORGAN).<br />

Participants made lexical decisions to targets or made a semantic relatedness<br />

judgment between primes and targets. In both tasks, for both<br />

triplet types, we found equivalent behavioral priming strengths and<br />

patterns across the two visual fields, counter to the predictions of<br />

coarse coding. Follow-up ERP studies also fail to support coarse coding,<br />

while pointing to other types of hemispheric differences in word<br />

processing.<br />

(3020)<br />

<strong>The</strong> Impact of Target Neighbors in Semantic Priming. YASUSHI<br />

HINO, YUU KUSUNOSE, & RURIKA NAKASHIMA, Waseda University,<br />

& STEPHEN J. LUPKER, University of Western Ontario—<br />

Recent results suggest that, when reading a word, the meanings of its<br />

orthographic neighbors are activated. For example, Bourassa and<br />

Besner (1998) reported a priming effect in lexical decision when an<br />

orthographic neighbor of a masked nonword prime was related to the<br />

target. In our experiments, we investigated the impact of the meanings<br />

of the target’s neighbors in lexical decision tasks with masked and unmasked<br />

primes. Lexical decision performance for katakana word targets<br />

was compared in two conditions: when a target neighbor (e.g.,<br />

rocket) was related to the prime (e.g., missile–POCKET) and when no<br />

target neighbors were related to the prime (e.g., school–POCKET). In<br />

addition, in order to evaluate the locus of the effect, we also manipulated<br />

the relatedness proportion. <strong>The</strong> results support the conclusions<br />

that the meanings of target neighbors are activated and the impact of<br />

this activation can be affected by relatedness proportion.<br />

(3021)<br />

<strong>The</strong> Effects of Cross-Language Activation on Bilingual Lexical<br />

Disambiguation. ANA I. SCHWARTZ & LI-HAO YEH, University of<br />

Texas, El Paso—<strong>The</strong> present study examined whether cross-language<br />

activation influences bilinguals’ processing of lexical ambiguity.<br />

Highly proficient Spanish–English bilinguals performed a semantic<br />

verification task in which sentence frames were followed by the presentation<br />

of the final word of the sentence (the prime word). Participants<br />

then decided whether a follow-up target word was related to the<br />

meaning of the sentence. On critical trials, the sentences ended in a<br />

semantically ambiguous word that was either a cognate with Spanish<br />

(e.g., novel) or a noncognate control (e.g., fast). <strong>The</strong> preceding sentence<br />

context biased the subordinate meaning, and targets were related<br />

to the irrelevant, dominant meaning (e.g., BOOK; SPEED). Mean reaction<br />

times and error rates were greater when the prime words were ambiguous<br />

cognates, suggesting that the semantic representations from<br />

the native language were coactivated and increased the competition<br />

from the shared, dominant meaning. Implications for current models<br />

of reading are discussed.<br />

• SPEECH PERCEPTION •<br />

(3022)<br />

<strong>The</strong> Time Course and Nature of Listeners’ Sensitivity to Indexical<br />

Information During Word Recognition. MOLLY ROBINSON & BOB<br />

MCMURRAY, University of Iowa (sponsored by Shaun P. Vecera)—<br />

Word recognition is sensitive to noncontrastive acoustic detail such as<br />

speaker identity. Episodic models explain this with lexical entries defined<br />

by exemplars that include speaker-specific and phonetic codes.<br />

Alternatively, such effects could arise from a purely phonetic lexicon<br />

if recognition was calibrated to voices (normalization). <strong>The</strong>se models<br />

were distinguished in a series of visual world experiments. <strong>The</strong> pri-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!