S1 (FriAM 1-65) - The Psychonomic Society
S1 (FriAM 1-65) - The Psychonomic Society S1 (FriAM 1-65) - The Psychonomic Society
Friday Evening Posters 3010–3015 Northwestern University (sponsored by David N. Rapp)—Research has demonstrated that readers rely upon fictional stories as sources of information (Marsh, Meade, & Roediger, 2003). Fiction, though, can vary in the degree to which it describes settings, characters, and events that conform with the real world. We investigated the ways in which unrealistic fiction might influence readers’ reliance on information embedded in stories, and their attributions of the source of any resulting knowledge. Stories were modified so contexts were farfetched and fantastical, to examine whether contexts might dissuade readers from relying on information in the stories. Participants completed a test of general world knowledge containing questions about embedded facts; some of these facts were entirely inaccurate or unfamiliar. Despite the contexts, participants’ responses suggested that they learned from the texts. Additionally, participants frequently attributed facts that they learned, including misinformation, to their prior knowledge, replicating Marsh et al. This demonstrates the strength with which readers rely on stories as sources of information. (3010) Anticipatory Processes During Comprehension of Poetry. JIM L. WOEHRLE & JOSEPH P. MAGLIANO, Northern Illinois University, & DAVID N. RAPP, Northwestern University (sponsored by Joseph P. Magliano)—Recent research suggests that comprehenders use phonological, semantic, and pragmatic information to anticipate upcoming lexical items in discourse. This experiment examined anticipatory processes during comprehension of rhymed quatrains with fixed rhyme structures (ABAB). Participants read rhymed quatrains that were presented without the final word or without the final one or two lines. Participants had to predict the poem-final word. When participants were presented with the first several lines of the poem, phonological constraints (e.g., number of rhyme possibilities) were the primary determinants of prediction accuracy. However, when presented with the entire poem (missing the final word), both phonological and discourse-level constraints (e.g., semantic overlap of the poem-final word with prior context) influenced prediction accuracy. These results suggest that while anticipatory processes in poetry comprehension can be influenced by both surface-level text properties and discourselevel information, surface-level properties may be of initial import until further discourse is available to the comprehender. (3011) How Nonnative Speakers Make Phonetic Adjustments to Partners in Dialogue. JIWON HWANG, SUSAN E. BRENNAN, & MARIE K. HUFFMAN, Stony Brook University—Ambiguities arise when nonnative speakers fail to make phonetic contrasts that are absent in their native language. Korean speakers lack the voicing contrast b/p (“mob” vs. “mop”) and the vowel contrast ae/E (“pat” vs. “pet”), leading to ambiguous pronunciation of English words. In two referential communication experiments, Korean speakers of English spontaneously pronounced target words (e.g., “mob”). A confederate partner either primed the target words (e.g., asking “What is below ‘hob’?”) or not, or needed to be able to pragmatically distinguish two contrasting words (“mob” adjacent to “mop” in the array) or not. Korean speakers produced more English-like phonetic targets in both the priming and pragmatic conditions (vowel duration was used to signal both contrasts). Moreover, Korean speakers were primed to make the disambiguating contrast when interacting with an English speaker but not with another Korean speaker of English. Implications for audience design and adaptation in dialogue are discussed. (3012) Can Giraffes Go Without Water Longer Than Zhiraffes? The Influence of Accent on Truth Judgment. SHIRI LEV-ARI & BOAZ KEYSAR, University of Chicago—Studies have shown that people infer various aspects of stimuli from their relative ease of processing. For instance, stimuli that are easier to process are judged as more familiar, clear, and truthful. Foreign-accented speech is harder to process than unaccented speech. Therefore, we investigated whether it is per- 88 ceived as less truthful than unaccented speech. Participants rated the truthfulness of trivia statements, such as Giraffes can go without water longer than camels can, read by native speakers of American English and nonnative speakers with a mild or a heavy accent. Participants were informed that the speakers read statements that the experimenter provided. Statements were rated as less truthful when read by nonnative as opposed to native speakers. Furthermore, the effect depended on participants’ expectations regarding the difficulty of processing accents and the heaviness of the speakers’ accents. These results demonstrate that accent has wide implications for the interaction between native and nonnative speakers. (3013) Individual Differences in Comprehension Monitoring. YASUHIRO OZURU, CHRISTOPHER A. KURBY, & DANIELLE S. MCNAMARA, University of Memphis—This experiment investigated whether and how readers monitor expository text comprehension. Participants read a 62-sentence passage on brain functions 1 sentence at a time in three different conditions: judgment of learning, judgment of sentence difficulty, or no judgment. Participants’ reading time of each sentence was measured. After reading the passage, participants answered 59 multiple choice questions about the passage content based on memory. The results indicated: (1) high-skill readers’ reading time is correlated with objective measures of sentence difficulty; (2) high-skill readers’ judgments (learning and difficulty) were correlated with their reading time; (3) readers’ judgments do not correspond to actual performance on multiple choice questions based on that sentence; and (4) performing overt metacognitive judgment tasks did not increase accuracy on comprehension questions in comparison with a nojudgment group. The results suggest that comprehension monitoring is a skilled process, but may not contribute to better comprehension in itself. (3014) Reading Comprehension: The Relative Contributions of Four Sources of Individual Differences. BRENDA A. M. HANNON, University of Texas, San Antonio—Although there has been considerable research demonstrating the separate contributions of lower level processes, higher level processes, working memory, and learning strategies/metacognitive skills to reading performance, at present, no study has compared all four sources simultaneously. As a result, we know little about how these four sources interact (see, e.g., Cornoldi, Beni, & Pazzaglia, 1996; Perfetti, Landi, & Oakhill, 2005) or whether one or all of the sources make separate and important contributions to reading (e.g., Cornoldi et al., 1996; Perfetti, Marron, & Foltz, 1996). The present study begins to address this issue. The results replicated a number of previous findings; however, they also revealed some interesting relationships, such as a negative relationship between repetition and higher level processes. The results also showed that although three of the sources made unique contributions to reading performance, lower level and higher level processes are the most important contributors. (3015) The Impact of Visual Availability on Referential Communication in Younger and Older Adults. KATYA A. OTIS & WILLIAM S. HORTON, Northwestern University—In referential communication tasks, partners work together to negotiate shared perspectives on task referents. Moreover, prior work has shown that older adults require more negotiation to achieve successful reference than do young adults (Horton & Spieler, in press). Typically, however, partners are prevented from seeing each other, even though eye gaze, head nods, and facial expressions may be important sources of information about understanding, particularly for older adults. We tested the impact of visual availability on communication by manipulating, for separate blocks of trials, whether pairs of younger and older adults could see each other as they matched sets of cards containing both abstract tangrams and caricatures of human faces. Lack of visual availability im-
Posters 3016–3022 Friday Evening paired communicative efficiency more for interactions involving tangrams than for those involving caricatures. For older adults, the effect of seeing the partner was particularly pronounced. Direct evidence for the use of visual availability was obtained by examining patterns of mutual gaze. • SEMANTIC PROCESSING OF WORDS • (3016) Measuring Semantic Satiation With a Categorical Matching Task. XING TIAN, University of Maryland, College Park, & DAVID E. HUBER, University of California, San Diego (sponsored by David E. Huber)—In the subjective experience of semantic satiation, the sense of meaning for a repeated word is progressively lost. However, semantic satiation has proven difficult to measure empirically. Using a category–exemplar speeded matching task, we developed a technique that reliably demonstrates an initial speed-up, followed by a later slow-down when responding to repeated occurrences of the same category label (e.g., MAMMAL), which was paired with novel exemplars from trial to trial (e.g., HORSE for match or APPLE for mismatch). This was achieved within a mixed list of 20 trials that contained 10 repetitions of the same category label and 10 trials with other category labels. The transition from faster to slower responding occurred both for match and mismatch trials. Two follow-up experiments used the same design but with exemplar–exemplar and word–word matching to determine how much of this effect is due to repetitions of meaning versus repetitions of orthography. (3017) Multiple, Multiple Primes and the Elimination and/or Reversal of Repetition Priming. JENNIFER H. COANE & DAVID A. BALOTA, Washington University (sponsored by David A. Balota)—In two experiments, we explored the functional relationship between the number and type of related primes and lexical activation of targets. On each trial, embedded within a 12-item list, 0 to 12 semantically/ associatively and/or orthographically/phonologically related primes preceded (250 msec/item) a single target for speeded pronunciation. On half of the trials, the target was embedded among the primes to assess repetition priming. Facilitatory repetition priming occurred when all other primes were unrelated. An interaction between repetition and semantic priming indicated that repetition priming was eliminated when six or more related primes preceded the target. Form priming and repetition priming yielded interactive, albeit inhibitory, effects: Repetition suppression was obtained for phonologically related lists. These results indicate that semantically related primes can produce asymptotic levels of activation (thereby eliminating the standard repetition priming effect), and form-related and repetition primes synergistically produce inhibition (thereby reversing the standard repetition priming effect). (3018) Decay of Automatic Semantic Priming From Visible Unidentifiable Primes in an RSVP Task. PATRICK A. O’CONNOR, JAMES H. NEELY, & JIAH PEARSON-LEARY, University at Albany—There is little direct evidence supporting the commonly held belief that semantic activation decays within 500–700 msec. In three RSVP experiments in which visible primes, which were not to be reported, occurred either 80, 240, 720, or 1,360 msec before the to-be-reported target’s onset, semantic priming was consistently significant at the 80and 240-msec delays and never significant at the 1,360-msec delay. Thus, automatic activation may last 720 msec but decays to nonsignificant levels by 1,320 msec. (3019) Examining the Coarse Coding Hypothesis: Evidence From Summation Priming of Lexically Ambiguous and Unambiguous Targets. PADMAPRIYA KANDHADAI & KARA D. FEDERMEIER, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign—The coarse coding hypothe- 89 sis postulates that meaning activation is focused in the left hemisphere (LH) but broad and weak in the right (RH). Consistent with coarse coding, some studies report an RH benefit for activating multiple meanings of lexically ambiguous words; however, others have failed to find an RH benefit for processing distantly linked unambiguous words. To address this issue, the present study employed a summationpriming paradigm: Two primes converged onto an unambiguous, lexically associated target (LION–STRIPES–TIGER) or diverged onto different meanings of an ambiguous target (KIDNEY–PIANO–ORGAN). Participants made lexical decisions to targets or made a semantic relatedness judgment between primes and targets. In both tasks, for both triplet types, we found equivalent behavioral priming strengths and patterns across the two visual fields, counter to the predictions of coarse coding. Follow-up ERP studies also fail to support coarse coding, while pointing to other types of hemispheric differences in word processing. (3020) The Impact of Target Neighbors in Semantic Priming. YASUSHI HINO, YUU KUSUNOSE, & RURIKA NAKASHIMA, Waseda University, & STEPHEN J. LUPKER, University of Western Ontario— Recent results suggest that, when reading a word, the meanings of its orthographic neighbors are activated. For example, Bourassa and Besner (1998) reported a priming effect in lexical decision when an orthographic neighbor of a masked nonword prime was related to the target. In our experiments, we investigated the impact of the meanings of the target’s neighbors in lexical decision tasks with masked and unmasked primes. Lexical decision performance for katakana word targets was compared in two conditions: when a target neighbor (e.g., rocket) was related to the prime (e.g., missile–POCKET) and when no target neighbors were related to the prime (e.g., school–POCKET). In addition, in order to evaluate the locus of the effect, we also manipulated the relatedness proportion. The results support the conclusions that the meanings of target neighbors are activated and the impact of this activation can be affected by relatedness proportion. (3021) The Effects of Cross-Language Activation on Bilingual Lexical Disambiguation. ANA I. SCHWARTZ & LI-HAO YEH, University of Texas, El Paso—The present study examined whether cross-language activation influences bilinguals’ processing of lexical ambiguity. Highly proficient Spanish–English bilinguals performed a semantic verification task in which sentence frames were followed by the presentation of the final word of the sentence (the prime word). Participants then decided whether a follow-up target word was related to the meaning of the sentence. On critical trials, the sentences ended in a semantically ambiguous word that was either a cognate with Spanish (e.g., novel) or a noncognate control (e.g., fast). The preceding sentence context biased the subordinate meaning, and targets were related to the irrelevant, dominant meaning (e.g., BOOK; SPEED). Mean reaction times and error rates were greater when the prime words were ambiguous cognates, suggesting that the semantic representations from the native language were coactivated and increased the competition from the shared, dominant meaning. Implications for current models of reading are discussed. • SPEECH PERCEPTION • (3022) The Time Course and Nature of Listeners’ Sensitivity to Indexical Information During Word Recognition. MOLLY ROBINSON & BOB MCMURRAY, University of Iowa (sponsored by Shaun P. Vecera)— Word recognition is sensitive to noncontrastive acoustic detail such as speaker identity. Episodic models explain this with lexical entries defined by exemplars that include speaker-specific and phonetic codes. Alternatively, such effects could arise from a purely phonetic lexicon if recognition was calibrated to voices (normalization). These models were distinguished in a series of visual world experiments. The pri-
- Page 37 and 38: Papers 237-243 Saturday Afternoon l
- Page 39 and 40: Papers 251-256 Saturday Afternoon N
- Page 41 and 42: Papers 263-269 Sunday Morning Task
- Page 43 and 44: Papers 277-283 Sunday Morning asses
- Page 45 and 46: Papers 290-296 Sunday Morning prior
- Page 47 and 48: Papers 303-309 Sunday Morning 11:00
- Page 49 and 50: Papers 317-322 Sunday Morning The G
- Page 51 and 52: Posters 1001-1007 Thursday Evening
- Page 53 and 54: Posters 1014-1020 Thursday Evening
- Page 55 and 56: Posters 1028-1034 Thursday Evening
- Page 57 and 58: Posters 1042-1048 Thursday Evening
- Page 59 and 60: Posters 1056-1061 Thursday Evening
- Page 61 and 62: Posters 1069-1075 Thursday Evening
- Page 63 and 64: Posters 1083-1089 Thursday Evening
- Page 65 and 66: Posters 1096-1102 Thursday Evening
- Page 67 and 68: Posters 1110-1116 Thursday Evening
- Page 69 and 70: Posters 2001-2007 Friday Noon POSTE
- Page 71 and 72: Posters 2015-2021 Friday Noon Smith
- Page 73 and 74: Posters 2028-2034 Friday Noon (2028
- Page 75 and 76: Posters 2041-2047 Friday Noon porta
- Page 77 and 78: Posters 2055-2061 Friday Noon probl
- Page 79 and 80: Posters 2069-2075 Friday Noon triev
- Page 81 and 82: Posters 2083-2089 Friday Noon faile
- Page 83 and 84: Posters 2097-2103 Friday Noon ing,
- Page 85 and 86: Posters 2112-2117 Friday Noon & JEF
- Page 87: Posters 3001-3009 Friday Evening PO
- Page 91 and 92: Posters 3030-3035 Friday Evening fr
- Page 93 and 94: Posters 3044-3050 Friday Evening in
- Page 95 and 96: Posters 3057-3063 Friday Evening (3
- Page 97 and 98: Posters 3071-3078 Friday Evening (3
- Page 99 and 100: Posters 3085-3091 Friday Evening (3
- Page 101 and 102: Posters 3099-3105 Friday Evening in
- Page 103 and 104: Posters 3112-3118 Friday Evening (3
- Page 105 and 106: Posters 4001-4007 Saturday Noon POS
- Page 107 and 108: Posters 4014-4020 Saturday Noon •
- Page 109 and 110: Posters 4028-4034 Saturday Noon ken
- Page 111 and 112: Posters 4041-4047 Saturday Noon ito
- Page 113 and 114: Posters 4055-4060 Saturday Noon mem
- Page 115 and 116: Posters 4069-4075 Saturday Noon •
- Page 117 and 118: Posters 4083-4089 Saturday Noon (40
- Page 119 and 120: Posters 4097-4103 Saturday Noon gen
- Page 121 and 122: Posters 4111-4116 Saturday Noon tal
- Page 123 and 124: Posters 5001-5007 Saturday Evening
- Page 125 and 126: Posters 5015-5021 Saturday Evening
- Page 127 and 128: Posters 5028-5034 Saturday Evening
- Page 129 and 130: Posters 5042-5047 Saturday Evening
- Page 131 and 132: Posters 5056-5062 Saturday Evening
- Page 133 and 134: Posters 5069-5075 Saturday Evening
- Page 135 and 136: Posters 5083-5089 Saturday Evening
- Page 137 and 138: Posters 5097-5102 Saturday Evening
Friday Evening Posters 3010–3015<br />
Northwestern University (sponsored by David N. Rapp)—Research<br />
has demonstrated that readers rely upon fictional stories as sources of<br />
information (Marsh, Meade, & Roediger, 2003). Fiction, though, can<br />
vary in the degree to which it describes settings, characters, and events<br />
that conform with the real world. We investigated the ways in which<br />
unrealistic fiction might influence readers’ reliance on information<br />
embedded in stories, and their attributions of the source of any resulting<br />
knowledge. Stories were modified so contexts were farfetched<br />
and fantastical, to examine whether contexts might dissuade<br />
readers from relying on information in the stories. Participants completed<br />
a test of general world knowledge containing questions about<br />
embedded facts; some of these facts were entirely inaccurate or unfamiliar.<br />
Despite the contexts, participants’ responses suggested that<br />
they learned from the texts. Additionally, participants frequently attributed<br />
facts that they learned, including misinformation, to their<br />
prior knowledge, replicating Marsh et al. This demonstrates the<br />
strength with which readers rely on stories as sources of information.<br />
(3010)<br />
Anticipatory Processes During Comprehension of Poetry. JIM L.<br />
WOEHRLE & JOSEPH P. MAGLIANO, Northern Illinois University,<br />
& DAVID N. RAPP, Northwestern University (sponsored by Joseph P.<br />
Magliano)—Recent research suggests that comprehenders use phonological,<br />
semantic, and pragmatic information to anticipate upcoming<br />
lexical items in discourse. This experiment examined anticipatory<br />
processes during comprehension of rhymed quatrains with fixed<br />
rhyme structures (ABAB). Participants read rhymed quatrains that<br />
were presented without the final word or without the final one or two<br />
lines. Participants had to predict the poem-final word. When participants<br />
were presented with the first several lines of the poem, phonological<br />
constraints (e.g., number of rhyme possibilities) were the primary<br />
determinants of prediction accuracy. However, when presented<br />
with the entire poem (missing the final word), both phonological and<br />
discourse-level constraints (e.g., semantic overlap of the poem-final<br />
word with prior context) influenced prediction accuracy. <strong>The</strong>se results<br />
suggest that while anticipatory processes in poetry comprehension<br />
can be influenced by both surface-level text properties and discourselevel<br />
information, surface-level properties may be of initial import<br />
until further discourse is available to the comprehender.<br />
(3011)<br />
How Nonnative Speakers Make Phonetic Adjustments to Partners<br />
in Dialogue. JIWON HWANG, SUSAN E. BRENNAN, & MARIE K.<br />
HUFFMAN, Stony Brook University—Ambiguities arise when nonnative<br />
speakers fail to make phonetic contrasts that are absent in their<br />
native language. Korean speakers lack the voicing contrast b/p (“mob”<br />
vs. “mop”) and the vowel contrast ae/E (“pat” vs. “pet”), leading to<br />
ambiguous pronunciation of English words. In two referential communication<br />
experiments, Korean speakers of English spontaneously<br />
pronounced target words (e.g., “mob”). A confederate partner either<br />
primed the target words (e.g., asking “What is below ‘hob’?”) or not,<br />
or needed to be able to pragmatically distinguish two contrasting<br />
words (“mob” adjacent to “mop” in the array) or not. Korean speakers<br />
produced more English-like phonetic targets in both the priming<br />
and pragmatic conditions (vowel duration was used to signal both contrasts).<br />
Moreover, Korean speakers were primed to make the disambiguating<br />
contrast when interacting with an English speaker but not<br />
with another Korean speaker of English. Implications for audience design<br />
and adaptation in dialogue are discussed.<br />
(3012)<br />
Can Giraffes Go Without Water Longer Than Zhiraffes? <strong>The</strong> Influence<br />
of Accent on Truth Judgment. SHIRI LEV-ARI & BOAZ<br />
KEYSAR, University of Chicago—Studies have shown that people<br />
infer various aspects of stimuli from their relative ease of processing.<br />
For instance, stimuli that are easier to process are judged as more familiar,<br />
clear, and truthful. Foreign-accented speech is harder to process<br />
than unaccented speech. <strong>The</strong>refore, we investigated whether it is per-<br />
88<br />
ceived as less truthful than unaccented speech. Participants rated the<br />
truthfulness of trivia statements, such as Giraffes can go without water<br />
longer than camels can, read by native speakers of American English<br />
and nonnative speakers with a mild or a heavy accent. Participants<br />
were informed that the speakers read statements that the experimenter<br />
provided. Statements were rated as less truthful when read by nonnative<br />
as opposed to native speakers. Furthermore, the effect depended<br />
on participants’ expectations regarding the difficulty of processing accents<br />
and the heaviness of the speakers’ accents. <strong>The</strong>se results demonstrate<br />
that accent has wide implications for the interaction between native<br />
and nonnative speakers.<br />
(3013)<br />
Individual Differences in Comprehension Monitoring. YASUHIRO<br />
OZURU, CHRISTOPHER A. KURBY, & DANIELLE S. MCNAMARA,<br />
University of Memphis—This experiment investigated whether and<br />
how readers monitor expository text comprehension. Participants read<br />
a 62-sentence passage on brain functions 1 sentence at a time in three<br />
different conditions: judgment of learning, judgment of sentence difficulty,<br />
or no judgment. Participants’ reading time of each sentence<br />
was measured. After reading the passage, participants answered 59<br />
multiple choice questions about the passage content based on memory.<br />
<strong>The</strong> results indicated: (1) high-skill readers’ reading time is correlated<br />
with objective measures of sentence difficulty; (2) high-skill<br />
readers’ judgments (learning and difficulty) were correlated with their<br />
reading time; (3) readers’ judgments do not correspond to actual performance<br />
on multiple choice questions based on that sentence; and<br />
(4) performing overt metacognitive judgment tasks did not increase<br />
accuracy on comprehension questions in comparison with a nojudgment<br />
group. <strong>The</strong> results suggest that comprehension monitoring<br />
is a skilled process, but may not contribute to better comprehension<br />
in itself.<br />
(3014)<br />
Reading Comprehension: <strong>The</strong> Relative Contributions of Four<br />
Sources of Individual Differences. BRENDA A. M. HANNON, University<br />
of Texas, San Antonio—Although there has been considerable<br />
research demonstrating the separate contributions of lower level<br />
processes, higher level processes, working memory, and learning<br />
strategies/metacognitive skills to reading performance, at present, no<br />
study has compared all four sources simultaneously. As a result, we<br />
know little about how these four sources interact (see, e.g., Cornoldi,<br />
Beni, & Pazzaglia, 1996; Perfetti, Landi, & Oakhill, 2005) or whether<br />
one or all of the sources make separate and important contributions<br />
to reading (e.g., Cornoldi et al., 1996; Perfetti, Marron, & Foltz, 1996).<br />
<strong>The</strong> present study begins to address this issue. <strong>The</strong> results replicated<br />
a number of previous findings; however, they also revealed some interesting<br />
relationships, such as a negative relationship between repetition<br />
and higher level processes. <strong>The</strong> results also showed that although<br />
three of the sources made unique contributions to reading<br />
performance, lower level and higher level processes are the most important<br />
contributors.<br />
(3015)<br />
<strong>The</strong> Impact of Visual Availability on Referential Communication<br />
in Younger and Older Adults. KATYA A. OTIS & WILLIAM S.<br />
HORTON, Northwestern University—In referential communication<br />
tasks, partners work together to negotiate shared perspectives on task<br />
referents. Moreover, prior work has shown that older adults require<br />
more negotiation to achieve successful reference than do young adults<br />
(Horton & Spieler, in press). Typically, however, partners are prevented<br />
from seeing each other, even though eye gaze, head nods, and<br />
facial expressions may be important sources of information about understanding,<br />
particularly for older adults. We tested the impact of visual<br />
availability on communication by manipulating, for separate<br />
blocks of trials, whether pairs of younger and older adults could see<br />
each other as they matched sets of cards containing both abstract tangrams<br />
and caricatures of human faces. Lack of visual availability im-