S1 (FriAM 1-65) - The Psychonomic Society
S1 (FriAM 1-65) - The Psychonomic Society S1 (FriAM 1-65) - The Psychonomic Society
Thursday Evening Posters 1090–1095 Bowling Green State University—Just and Carpenter (1985) proposed that people with low spatial ability (lows) perform spatial tasks (e.g., mental rotation, cube comparison) less accurately than do highs because of individual differences in working memory. Miyake et al. (2001) found that different spatial ability measures tap into maintenance and executive components of working memory differentially. We developed an interactive version of Just and Carpenter’s task where the participant decides whether two cubes with letters on their surfaces are the same. The interactive component allowed participants to rotate the cube rather than imagining it rotating. With the reduced demands on working memory that the interactive task affords, we expected lows to perform as well as highs on the task. Differences in accuracy were eliminated, but the two groups demonstrated differences in their understanding of rotational transformations, the amount of time spent planning, and whether they matched the letters on all the visible faces before responding. (1090) Hemovelocity and Performance Demonstrate That Complexity Limits Visual Short-Term Memory. NATASHA A. BARRETT, Georgia State University, MICHAEL J. BERAN, Language Research Center, & DAVID A. WASHBURN, Georgia State University (sponsored by David A. Washburn)—Two theoretical models have been proposed to explain the capacity limit of visual short-term memory. The fixed slot model states that visual capacity is limited by the number of objects in a display. The flexible slot model states that visual capacity is limited by the complexity of the objects in the display. Previous researchers have focused on the spatial component of visual capacity instead of object memory. We instead examined object memory in a change detection task using random polygons that varied on the complexity of the image and the number of objects presented. In conjunction with recognition memory performance, we incorporated brain activity as revealed by hemovelocity. Hemovelocity was measured by transcranial Doppler sonography. Performance and brain activity varied as a function of object complexity. Capacity fell far below the level proposed by the fixed slot model. The results therefore favor the flexible slot model. (1091) The Intricacies of Encoding and Rehearsal in Spatial Memory. KATHERINE GUÉRARD & SÉBASTIEN TREMBLAY, University of Laval, & JEAN SAINT-AUBIN, University of Moncton—In spatial serial recall, performance increases as the distance between the consecutive stimuli locations decreases. This effect, known as the path length effect (Parmentier, Elford, & Maybery, 2005), was investigated in order to examine the mechanisms implicated in memory for spatial information. The participants had to recall the order in which spatial locations were presented. In half of the to-be-remembered sequences, the distance between consecutive dots was short, and in the other half, the distance was long. Moreover, participants had to perform visual suppression, an interfering task in which they had to incessantly move their eyes from one location to another during the delay (Experiment 1) or during item presentation (Experiment 2). Combined with the analysis of eye movements, the use of visual suppression suggested that the path length effect takes place at encoding, since the effect was reduced when the interfering task was carried out during item presentation, but not during the delay. (1092) Veridical Memory in Category-Based Spatial Distortions: A Retrieval Model. CRISTINA SAMPAIO, Western Washington University, & RANXIAO FRANCES WANG, University of Illinois, Urbana- Champaign—Studies showed that systematic categorical distortions occur in spatial memory recall. The present experiment investigated whether people have access to the veridical memory for a target’s location. Each trial contained two separate tasks. The first task involved a standard location reproduction procedure after a brief view of a target within a blank circle. The second task involved a forced-choice 64 recognition procedure after a re-presentation of the same target within the circle. In this task, the foil item for each participant was the participant’s own recalled location of the target recorded in the first task of the trial. The results for the reproduction task replicated the category bias effect. However, participants selected the original location of the target in approximately 77% of the trials in the recognition task. These findings indicate that people retain a veridical memory of the original location and are able to select that location after a delay. (1093) Working Memory in Developing and Applying Spatial Mental Models. TAD T. BRUNYE, Tufts University & U.S. Army Research, Development, and Engineering Command, & HOLLY A. TAYLOR, Tufts University—A series of four experiments examined working memory involvement during the construction and application of spatial mental models. Experiment 1 used a dual-task paradigm to examine visuospatial, articulatory, and central executive involvement during survey and route description learning. Converging evidence from inference and declarative memory tasks suggests articulatory involvement in text processing, and visuospatial and central executive involvement in spatial mental model development, particularly during route description learning. Experiment 2 applied the dual-task paradigm during the application of spatial mental models. An articulatory dual-task slowed the successful recognition of verbatim information, whereas visuospatial and central executive dual-tasks slowed inference verification; accuracy was not affected. Taken together, results suggest that spatial mental models develop and are successfully applied through interactions between multiple working memory systems. Furthermore, this involvement varies as a function of description perspective. (1094) Response Mode Differences in Perspective Taking: Differences in Interference or Differences in Strategy? JONATHAN W. KELLY & TIMOTHY P. MCNAMARA, Vanderbilt University—Two experiments explored the effects of response mode on imagined perspective taking. Participants learned object locations and then, while blindfolded, pointed to and verbally described object locations from perspectives aligned or misaligned with their current facing direction. On the basis of May’s (2004) sensorimotor interference theory, pointing responses, but not verbal responses, were expected to be hindered by a reference frame conflict for misaligned perspectives. Contrary to this hypothesis, a performance advantage for aligned as opposed to misaligned perspectives was found for both response types. To investigate the possibility that previously reported response type effects were due to differences in strategy and not differences in interference, participants were instructed to use a third-person strategy. This alternative strategy resulted in similar performance from aligned and misaligned perspectives for verbal labeling, but not for pointing. We propose that previous findings attributed to differences in sensorimotor interference could be due to differences in strategy. • MUSIC COGNITION • (1095) Mechanisms of Melody Recognition. JOSH MCDERMOTT & AN- DREW J. OXENHAM, University of Minnesota—The pattern of upward and downward changes in pitch, known as the melodic contour, is thought to be a primary means by which humans recognize melodies. To probe the nature of the contour representation, we asked subjects to judge whether the contours of two successive melodies were the same or different. The first melody was always defined by variation in pitch, while the second varied along one of several different dimensions. We found that subjects could perform at high levels when the second stimulus varied in brightness, intensity, or pitch, but not when it varied in other attributes. However, subjects could only perform the task when brightness or intensity changes were mapped to pitch changes of the same sign—that is, when intensity/brightness
Posters 1096–1102 Thursday Evening increases corresponded to pitch increases rather than decreases. The results are consistent with a mechanism not exclusive to pitch, perhaps operating on dimensions that evoke a vertical metaphor. (1096) Investigating the Psychological Representation of Tonality in Imagined Contexts. DOMINIQUE VUVAN & MARK A. SCHMUCKLER, University of Toronto—Musical imagery was examined by investigating musically trained listeners’ abilities to image a major tonality when presented with a cue tone varying in its musical relatedness to the to-be-imagined key (e.g., “imagine this cue tone as the tonic or mediant or dominant of a major tonality”). Specifically, listeners heard a range of cue tones followed by a probe tone, and then rated how well the probe fit with the imagined tonality. Analyses of probe tone profiles revealed that listeners successfully imaged the requested tonality despite the varying musical relatedness of the cue, and also revealed that the implied tonality of the cue tone itself had an independent influence on listeners’ ratings. Analyses of the time required to image a tonality revealed no influence of the musical relatedness of the cue tone, except when the cue tone was the tonic of the intended key, which produced significantly faster image times. (1097) Feature Binding and List Length in Memory for Musical Phrases. W. J. DOWLING, University of Texas, Dallas, & BARBARA TILL- MANN, CNRS–UMR 5020 Lyon—We previously found that memory for musical phrases improves during the 15 sec following their presentation (Music Perception, 2001). This led us to hypothesize that the binding of features of musical phrases during memory encoding is a gradual process occurring while the listener continues to follow the music. This feature binding leads to reduced confusion in a recognition test between target items (T) and similar lures (S), a confusion engendered by shared individual features that dissipates when those features are correctly bound (for example, by the correct placement of a melody on its musical scale). This suggests that recognition performance should improve with coherent, connected lists of musical phrases as list length increases (in contrast to the decline found with disconnected lists of verbal materials). Pilot work with lengths of 2 and 4 items confirms the hypothesis, and we will report results for lists of 2, 3, 4, and 6 phrases. (1098) Nobody’s Perfect: Neural Correlates of Performance Errors in Musicians. CLEMENS MAIDHOF, MARTINA RIEGER, STEFAN KOELSCH, & WOLFGANG PRINZ, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (sponsored by Wolfgang Prinz)—Playing a musical instrument at a professional level is a highly demanding task requiring the constant and precise monitoring of one’s own actions to achieve correct performance. In the present experiment, we investigated the neurophysiological correlates of performance errors of pianists. 12 pianists were blindfolded and were asked to play fast sequences bimanually on a digital piano while the EEG was measured. Event-related potentials of self-made errors were computed and compared with those of correct notes. The results showed that electric brain responses differed between correct and erroneous performance already 100 msec before the onset of a wrong note. This implies that not all error-related mechanisms rely on auditory feedback, and that errors are neurally detected prior to the completion of an erroneous movement. Thus, it appears that musicians can detect errors already at an early planning stage, possibly by using internal forward models. (1099) Increasing Pitch Velocity Increases the Magnitude of the Auditory Kappa Effect. MOLLY J. HENRY & J. DEVIN MCAULEY, Bowling Green State University—Three experiments tested the hypothesis that implied pitch velocity modulates the strength of the auditory kappa effect. Participants judged the relative timing of the middle “target” tone in three-tone sequences, ignoring pitch. In Experiment 1, pitch 65 was held constant, but the temporal midpoint between the onsets of the first and third tones varied between subjects and took on one of three values (364 msec, 500 msec, 800 msec). In Experiments 2 and 3, tone sequences ascended or descended in pitch, respectively, and implied pitch velocity took on one of three values (4 ST/364 msec, 4 ST/500 msec, 4 ST/800 msec). Consistent with visual kappa findings, the auditory kappa effect was larger for sequences with a faster pitch velocity (e.g., 4 ST/364 msec) than for sequences with a slower pitch velocity (e.g., 4 ST/800 msec) for both ascending and descending sequences. • VISUAL PERCEPTION • (1100) ART-E Theory: Perceived Depth and Width Is a Function of Visual Angle Ratio and Elevation. IGOR JURICEVIC, JOHN M. KENNEDY, & IZABELLA ABRAMOV, University of Toronto, Scarborough (sponsored by John M. Kennedy)—How does vision react when perceiving an object’s aspect ratio (depth/width) in a perspective picture? ART theory (Juricevic & Kennedy, 2006) proposes that vision uses a visual angle ratio (ratio of the visual angles of the object’s depth and width) and the object’s angle-from-the-normal (direction of the object from the central vanishing point). We now propose ART-E theory, which substitutes angle of elevation for angle-from-the-normal. Consider two paths of square tiles, one directly in front (heading of 0º) and the other at a heading of 45º to the left. ART and ART-E theory make identical predictions for the changes in perceived aspect ratios of the tiles along the path directly ahead. However, they differ for the path at 45º. The predictions were tested with panoramic perspective pictures of three paths of square tiles differing in heading (0º, 30º, 45º). Subjects’ judgments of the tiles in the paths support ART-E theory. (1101) Influencing the Strength of the Horizontal/Vertical Illusion. ALAN SEARLEMAN, St. Lawrence University, CLARE PORAC, Pennsylvania State University, Erie, & KENDRA HORTON & JENNELLE ALVIN, St. Lawrence University—The strongest version of the horizontal/vertical (HV) illusion is comprised of two intersecting lines of equal length: a vertical line bisecting a horizontal line, resembling an upside down “T.” Most people perceive the vertical line as being longer. This study compared the effectiveness of two competing theories in predicting changes in the strength of the HV illusion. We attempted to alter the original illusion by adding black distractor dots at either 2 mm or 10 mm from the line endpoints in order to either maximize or minimize the illusion’s typical strength. Functional fovea theory would predict that the 10-mm dots should be more effective, whereas the centroid extraction theory would expect the dots placed at 2 mm to be more effective. The results left no doubt that the 2-mm distractor dots (and hence centroid extraction theory) were the most effective in manipulating the strength of the HV. (1102) Effects of Prime Diagnosticity During Perceptual Identification: Strategies or Implicit Adaptation? CHRISTOPH T. WEIDEMANN, University of Pennsylvania, DAVID E. HUBER, University of California, San Diego, & RICHARD M. SHIFFRIN, Indiana University—Effects of prime diagnosticity in perceptual tasks are often claimed to stem from strategic responding, but this assumption is rarely tested. We manipulated prime duration and prime diagnosticity in a visual forcedchoice perceptual identification task with repetition priming. The strength and direction of prime diagnosticity produced marked effects on choice accuracy, but those effects were resistant to subsequent changes of diagnosticity. In additional experiments, participants learned to associate different diagnosticities with primes of different durations, but not with primes presented in different colors. Regardless of prime diagnosticity, preference for a primed alternative covaried negatively with prime duration. These findings suggest that prime diagnosticity affects performance not through strategic responding,
- Page 13 and 14: Papers 79-85 Friday Afternoon prese
- Page 15 and 16: Papers 92-98 Friday Afternoon less
- Page 17 and 18: Papers 105-112 Friday Afternoon App
- Page 19 and 20: Papers 120-126 Friday Afternoon SHI
- Page 21 and 22: Papers 131-137 Saturday Morning Lex
- Page 23 and 24: Papers 144-150 Saturday Morning sul
- Page 25 and 26: Papers 158-164 Saturday Morning enc
- Page 27 and 28: Papers 172-178 Saturday Morning Ski
- Page 29 and 30: Papers 187-193 Saturday Morning ten
- Page 31 and 32: Papers 197-203 Saturday Afternoon S
- Page 33 and 34: Papers 210-216 Saturday Afternoon A
- Page 35 and 36: Papers 223-229 Saturday Afternoon 2
- Page 37 and 38: Papers 237-243 Saturday Afternoon l
- Page 39 and 40: Papers 251-256 Saturday Afternoon N
- Page 41 and 42: Papers 263-269 Sunday Morning Task
- Page 43 and 44: Papers 277-283 Sunday Morning asses
- Page 45 and 46: Papers 290-296 Sunday Morning prior
- Page 47 and 48: Papers 303-309 Sunday Morning 11:00
- Page 49 and 50: Papers 317-322 Sunday Morning The G
- Page 51 and 52: Posters 1001-1007 Thursday Evening
- Page 53 and 54: Posters 1014-1020 Thursday Evening
- Page 55 and 56: Posters 1028-1034 Thursday Evening
- Page 57 and 58: Posters 1042-1048 Thursday Evening
- Page 59 and 60: Posters 1056-1061 Thursday Evening
- Page 61 and 62: Posters 1069-1075 Thursday Evening
- Page 63: Posters 1083-1089 Thursday Evening
- Page 67 and 68: Posters 1110-1116 Thursday Evening
- Page 69 and 70: Posters 2001-2007 Friday Noon POSTE
- Page 71 and 72: Posters 2015-2021 Friday Noon Smith
- Page 73 and 74: Posters 2028-2034 Friday Noon (2028
- Page 75 and 76: Posters 2041-2047 Friday Noon porta
- Page 77 and 78: Posters 2055-2061 Friday Noon probl
- Page 79 and 80: Posters 2069-2075 Friday Noon triev
- Page 81 and 82: Posters 2083-2089 Friday Noon faile
- Page 83 and 84: Posters 2097-2103 Friday Noon ing,
- Page 85 and 86: Posters 2112-2117 Friday Noon & JEF
- Page 87 and 88: Posters 3001-3009 Friday Evening PO
- Page 89 and 90: Posters 3016-3022 Friday Evening pa
- Page 91 and 92: Posters 3030-3035 Friday Evening fr
- Page 93 and 94: Posters 3044-3050 Friday Evening in
- Page 95 and 96: Posters 3057-3063 Friday Evening (3
- Page 97 and 98: Posters 3071-3078 Friday Evening (3
- Page 99 and 100: Posters 3085-3091 Friday Evening (3
- Page 101 and 102: Posters 3099-3105 Friday Evening in
- Page 103 and 104: Posters 3112-3118 Friday Evening (3
- Page 105 and 106: Posters 4001-4007 Saturday Noon POS
- Page 107 and 108: Posters 4014-4020 Saturday Noon •
- Page 109 and 110: Posters 4028-4034 Saturday Noon ken
- Page 111 and 112: Posters 4041-4047 Saturday Noon ito
- Page 113 and 114: Posters 4055-4060 Saturday Noon mem
Thursday Evening Posters 1090–1095<br />
Bowling Green State University—Just and Carpenter (1985) proposed<br />
that people with low spatial ability (lows) perform spatial tasks (e.g.,<br />
mental rotation, cube comparison) less accurately than do highs because<br />
of individual differences in working memory. Miyake et al.<br />
(2001) found that different spatial ability measures tap into maintenance<br />
and executive components of working memory differentially.<br />
We developed an interactive version of Just and Carpenter’s task<br />
where the participant decides whether two cubes with letters on their<br />
surfaces are the same. <strong>The</strong> interactive component allowed participants<br />
to rotate the cube rather than imagining it rotating. With the reduced<br />
demands on working memory that the interactive task affords, we expected<br />
lows to perform as well as highs on the task. Differences in accuracy<br />
were eliminated, but the two groups demonstrated differences<br />
in their understanding of rotational transformations, the amount of<br />
time spent planning, and whether they matched the letters on all the<br />
visible faces before responding.<br />
(1090)<br />
Hemovelocity and Performance Demonstrate That Complexity<br />
Limits Visual Short-Term Memory. NATASHA A. BARRETT,<br />
Georgia State University, MICHAEL J. BERAN, Language Research<br />
Center, & DAVID A. WASHBURN, Georgia State University (sponsored<br />
by David A. Washburn)—Two theoretical models have been<br />
proposed to explain the capacity limit of visual short-term memory.<br />
<strong>The</strong> fixed slot model states that visual capacity is limited by the number<br />
of objects in a display. <strong>The</strong> flexible slot model states that visual<br />
capacity is limited by the complexity of the objects in the display. Previous<br />
researchers have focused on the spatial component of visual capacity<br />
instead of object memory. We instead examined object memory<br />
in a change detection task using random polygons that varied on<br />
the complexity of the image and the number of objects presented. In<br />
conjunction with recognition memory performance, we incorporated<br />
brain activity as revealed by hemovelocity. Hemovelocity was measured<br />
by transcranial Doppler sonography. Performance and brain activity<br />
varied as a function of object complexity. Capacity fell far below<br />
the level proposed by the fixed slot model. <strong>The</strong> results therefore favor<br />
the flexible slot model.<br />
(1091)<br />
<strong>The</strong> Intricacies of Encoding and Rehearsal in Spatial Memory.<br />
KATHERINE GUÉRARD & SÉBASTIEN TREMBLAY, University<br />
of Laval, & JEAN SAINT-AUBIN, University of Moncton—In spatial<br />
serial recall, performance increases as the distance between the consecutive<br />
stimuli locations decreases. This effect, known as the path<br />
length effect (Parmentier, Elford, & Maybery, 2005), was investigated<br />
in order to examine the mechanisms implicated in memory for spatial<br />
information. <strong>The</strong> participants had to recall the order in which spatial<br />
locations were presented. In half of the to-be-remembered sequences,<br />
the distance between consecutive dots was short, and in the other half,<br />
the distance was long. Moreover, participants had to perform visual<br />
suppression, an interfering task in which they had to incessantly move<br />
their eyes from one location to another during the delay (Experiment<br />
1) or during item presentation (Experiment 2). Combined with<br />
the analysis of eye movements, the use of visual suppression suggested<br />
that the path length effect takes place at encoding, since the effect<br />
was reduced when the interfering task was carried out during item<br />
presentation, but not during the delay.<br />
(1092)<br />
Veridical Memory in Category-Based Spatial Distortions: A Retrieval<br />
Model. CRISTINA SAMPAIO, Western Washington University,<br />
& RANXIAO FRANCES WANG, University of Illinois, Urbana-<br />
Champaign—Studies showed that systematic categorical distortions<br />
occur in spatial memory recall. <strong>The</strong> present experiment investigated<br />
whether people have access to the veridical memory for a target’s location.<br />
Each trial contained two separate tasks. <strong>The</strong> first task involved<br />
a standard location reproduction procedure after a brief view of a target<br />
within a blank circle. <strong>The</strong> second task involved a forced-choice<br />
64<br />
recognition procedure after a re-presentation of the same target within<br />
the circle. In this task, the foil item for each participant was the participant’s<br />
own recalled location of the target recorded in the first task<br />
of the trial. <strong>The</strong> results for the reproduction task replicated the category<br />
bias effect. However, participants selected the original location<br />
of the target in approximately 77% of the trials in the recognition task.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se findings indicate that people retain a veridical memory of the<br />
original location and are able to select that location after a delay.<br />
(1093)<br />
Working Memory in Developing and Applying Spatial Mental<br />
Models. TAD T. BRUNYE, Tufts University & U.S. Army Research,<br />
Development, and Engineering Command, & HOLLY A. TAYLOR,<br />
Tufts University—A series of four experiments examined working<br />
memory involvement during the construction and application of spatial<br />
mental models. Experiment 1 used a dual-task paradigm to examine<br />
visuospatial, articulatory, and central executive involvement<br />
during survey and route description learning. Converging evidence<br />
from inference and declarative memory tasks suggests articulatory involvement<br />
in text processing, and visuospatial and central executive<br />
involvement in spatial mental model development, particularly during<br />
route description learning. Experiment 2 applied the dual-task paradigm<br />
during the application of spatial mental models. An articulatory<br />
dual-task slowed the successful recognition of verbatim information,<br />
whereas visuospatial and central executive dual-tasks slowed inference<br />
verification; accuracy was not affected. Taken together, results<br />
suggest that spatial mental models develop and are successfully applied<br />
through interactions between multiple working memory systems.<br />
Furthermore, this involvement varies as a function of description<br />
perspective.<br />
(1094)<br />
Response Mode Differences in Perspective Taking: Differences in<br />
Interference or Differences in Strategy? JONATHAN W. KELLY &<br />
TIMOTHY P. MCNAMARA, Vanderbilt University—Two experiments<br />
explored the effects of response mode on imagined perspective taking.<br />
Participants learned object locations and then, while blindfolded,<br />
pointed to and verbally described object locations from perspectives<br />
aligned or misaligned with their current facing direction. On the basis<br />
of May’s (2004) sensorimotor interference theory, pointing responses,<br />
but not verbal responses, were expected to be hindered by a reference<br />
frame conflict for misaligned perspectives. Contrary to this hypothesis,<br />
a performance advantage for aligned as opposed to misaligned<br />
perspectives was found for both response types. To investigate the<br />
possibility that previously reported response type effects were due to<br />
differences in strategy and not differences in interference, participants<br />
were instructed to use a third-person strategy. This alternative strategy<br />
resulted in similar performance from aligned and misaligned perspectives<br />
for verbal labeling, but not for pointing. We propose that<br />
previous findings attributed to differences in sensorimotor interference<br />
could be due to differences in strategy.<br />
• MUSIC COGNITION •<br />
(1095)<br />
Mechanisms of Melody Recognition. JOSH MCDERMOTT & AN-<br />
DREW J. OXENHAM, University of Minnesota—<strong>The</strong> pattern of upward<br />
and downward changes in pitch, known as the melodic contour,<br />
is thought to be a primary means by which humans recognize<br />
melodies. To probe the nature of the contour representation, we asked<br />
subjects to judge whether the contours of two successive melodies<br />
were the same or different. <strong>The</strong> first melody was always defined by<br />
variation in pitch, while the second varied along one of several different<br />
dimensions. We found that subjects could perform at high levels<br />
when the second stimulus varied in brightness, intensity, or pitch,<br />
but not when it varied in other attributes. However, subjects could only<br />
perform the task when brightness or intensity changes were mapped<br />
to pitch changes of the same sign—that is, when intensity/brightness