29.01.2013 Views

S1 (FriAM 1-65) - The Psychonomic Society

S1 (FriAM 1-65) - The Psychonomic Society

S1 (FriAM 1-65) - The Psychonomic Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Thursday Evening Posters 1035–1041<br />

affect of the second face more strongly determined this AIE than did<br />

the affect of the first face. <strong>The</strong> SAJ task required observers to compare<br />

first and second stimulus affect in order to determine whether<br />

they were congruent. As in the priming task, an AIE was found. However,<br />

unlike in the priming task, priming was not evident and the observed<br />

AIE was determined by the affect of the first face. This was so<br />

despite the active processing of both faces required in the SAJ task.<br />

(1035)<br />

Modulation of the Stroop Effect by Inhibition of Return. JONG<br />

MOON CHOI & YANG SEOK CHO, Korea University—In a visual<br />

orienting task, reaction times are longer when a target is presented at<br />

a cued location than at an uncued location about 1,000 msec after an<br />

exogenous cue flashed. This phenomenon is called inhibition of return<br />

(IOR). To examine whether the magnitude of the interference effect<br />

would be modulated by IOR in the Stroop task, a color carrier, a<br />

color word, or neither of them was presented at the cued location 800,<br />

1,050, or 1,300 msec after an exogenous cue flashed. <strong>The</strong> Stroop effect<br />

was largest when nothing was presented at the cued location, intermediate<br />

when the color carrier was, and smallest when a color word<br />

was at 1,050-msec SOA. However, this interaction disappeared at<br />

800-msec and 1,300-msec SOAs. This reduced Stroop effect is due to<br />

the stimulus not being processed efficiently because of IOR, which is<br />

supposed to provoke lack of attention.<br />

(1036)<br />

Biologically Significant Stimuli Produce Visual Prior Entry.<br />

GREG L. WEST, ADAM A. K. ANDERSON, & JAY PRATT, University<br />

of Toronto (sponsored by Jay Pratt)—It remains unclear whether<br />

biologically significant stimuli, such as neutral or threatening faces,<br />

receive attention prior in time to other contemporaneous stimuli. Visual<br />

prior entry, as measured by temporal order judgments (TOJs),<br />

rests on the premise that allocated attention accelerates perception;<br />

that is, attended stimuli are perceived before unattended stimuli, and<br />

thus this method is a sensitive and direct measure of attentional capture.<br />

We demonstrate, using a novel TOJ paradigm without cues, that<br />

schematic faces of both neutral and angry emotional valence show visual<br />

prior entry effects; that is, these stimuli are perceived prior in<br />

time in comparison with competing stimuli. We further extend these<br />

results by contrasting effects produced both by schematic and real<br />

face stimuli. This study provides direct evidence that biologically significant<br />

stimuli, in schematic or photographic form, bias the contents<br />

of awareness and thus are perceived prior in time.<br />

(1037)<br />

Learning to Flexibly Dual-Task: When Single-Task Automaticity<br />

Is and Is Not Enough. NICOLE M. HILL & WALTER S. SCHNEIDER,<br />

University of Pittsburgh (sponsored by James Voss)—Dual processing<br />

theory predicts that controlled but not automatically processed<br />

single-task performance will decline in a dual-task context. However,<br />

declines in a dual-task context occur regardless of processing mode.<br />

We posit that (1) single-task learning is necessary but not sufficient<br />

for automatic dual-task performance, (2) extensive dual-task practice<br />

develops dual-task automatic processing, and (3) automatic dual-tasks<br />

can be flexibly performed—that is, novel dual-task combinations<br />

(NDTC) and single-trained-only targets (STOT). Ninety stimuli/sec<br />

were presented in a display containing four distinct tasks. Single-todual<br />

transfer resulted in declining performance; training nearly attenuated<br />

this decline. <strong>The</strong> NDTC and STOT conditions produced a modest<br />

dual-task cost relative to untrained dual-tasking. This suggests that<br />

single-task (consistent) training retains a degree of controlled processing<br />

that was released by dual-task training; furthermore, performance<br />

became flexible and remained high-level despite task alterations.<br />

(1038)<br />

A Word Choice: <strong>The</strong> Effect of Emotion on Lexical Decision and<br />

Accuracy. JOSEPH M. BAKER & STEPHEN R. SCHMIDT, Middle<br />

Tennessee State University (sponsored by Stephen R. Schmidt)—Past<br />

56<br />

research has failed to show significant lexical decision reaction time<br />

differences between emotional and nonemotional words. It is possible<br />

that the relatively long stimulus presentations employed in earlier<br />

studies were responsible for these null effects. In order to investigate<br />

the role of stimulus durations in the lexical decision task, emotional,<br />

neutral, and nonwords were presented to participants randomly in one<br />

of four stimulus durations (e.g., 30, 50, 75, and 100 msec). Emotional<br />

words were responded to faster than neutral and nonwords. Also, participants<br />

were more accurate in identifying emotional words than neutral<br />

words within all presentation durations, with the largest difference<br />

occurring within the 30-msec presentation duration. <strong>The</strong>se results<br />

suggest that lexical decision reaction time differences do exist between<br />

emotional and neutral words, as well as supporting findings that<br />

suggest that emotional words are attended to faster than neutral words.<br />

(1039)<br />

Deviations of Pointing Movements Toward the Irrelevant Stimulus<br />

Location in Vertical and Horizontal Simon Tasks. SIMONA BUETTI<br />

& DIRK KERZEL, University of Geneva—In the Simon effect (SE),<br />

responses to the color of a stimulus are faster when the irrelevant position<br />

of the colored stimulus is congruent with the response location.<br />

<strong>The</strong> SE decreases with increasing reaction times (RTs) for horizontal,<br />

but not for vertical, stimulus arrangements. Consistent with RTs, the<br />

lateralized readiness potential (LRP) shows an early deflection in incongruent<br />

trials of horizontal, but not vertical, Simon tasks. We observed<br />

that the trajectories of pointing movements were attracted by<br />

the irrelevant stimulus position. Furthermore, deviations toward the<br />

irrelevant stimulus decreased with increasing RT for both horizontal<br />

and vertical Simon tasks. Thus, the SE in movement parameters mirrored<br />

the time course in RTs for horizontal, but not vertical, stimulus<br />

arrangements. <strong>The</strong>se results suggest that the early deflection in LRPs<br />

may underlie the time course of the SE in RTs, but not the SE in movement<br />

trajectories.<br />

(1040)<br />

A Task-Difficulty Artifact in Subliminal Priming. MICHAEL S.<br />

PRATTE & JEFFREY N. ROUDER, University of Missouri, Columbia<br />

(sponsored by Jeffrey N. Rouder)—Subliminal priming is said to<br />

occur when a subliminal prime influences the identification of a subsequent<br />

target. Most subliminal priming claims are based on separate<br />

target and prime identification tasks. We argue that because prime<br />

identification is difficult, participants’ motivation wanes and, consequently,<br />

prime-identification performance suffers. Identification of<br />

weak stimuli may, therefore, appear at chance. To test this artifact, we<br />

increased the ease of the prime-identification task by intermixing easy<br />

(visible) primes with difficult (near liminal) ones. In Experiment 1,<br />

this strategy of intermixing easy primes is shown to raise identification<br />

of the difficult ones. In Experiment 2, prime duration was lowered<br />

such that prime identification was near chance in intermixed presentations.<br />

Under these conditions, we fail to observe any priming<br />

effects. Hence, previous demonstrations of subliminal priming may<br />

simply reflect a task difficulty artifact.<br />

(1041)<br />

Coding Strategies in Number Space. OLIVER LINDEMANN, Radboud<br />

University, JUAN M. ABOLAFIA, Miguel Hernandez University,<br />

JAY PRATT, University of Toronto, & HAROLD BEKKERING,<br />

Radboud University Nijmegen (sponsored by Harold Bekkering)—<br />

<strong>The</strong> present study investigates the impact of task demands on the association<br />

of spatial and numerical response codes (SNARC effect).<br />

Participants were instructed to memorize three simultaneously presented<br />

Arabic digits describing a left-to-right ascending number sequence,<br />

a descending sequence, or a disordered sequence. Afterward,<br />

participants indicated the parity status of a centrally presented digit.<br />

As the response latencies showed, SNARC effects in the parity task<br />

were mediated by the coding requirements of memory tasks. That is,<br />

SNARC effects were present only after memorizing ascending or disordered<br />

number sequences but disappeared after processing descend-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!