S1 (FriAM 1-65) - The Psychonomic Society
S1 (FriAM 1-65) - The Psychonomic Society
S1 (FriAM 1-65) - The Psychonomic Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Thursday Evening Posters 1035–1041<br />
affect of the second face more strongly determined this AIE than did<br />
the affect of the first face. <strong>The</strong> SAJ task required observers to compare<br />
first and second stimulus affect in order to determine whether<br />
they were congruent. As in the priming task, an AIE was found. However,<br />
unlike in the priming task, priming was not evident and the observed<br />
AIE was determined by the affect of the first face. This was so<br />
despite the active processing of both faces required in the SAJ task.<br />
(1035)<br />
Modulation of the Stroop Effect by Inhibition of Return. JONG<br />
MOON CHOI & YANG SEOK CHO, Korea University—In a visual<br />
orienting task, reaction times are longer when a target is presented at<br />
a cued location than at an uncued location about 1,000 msec after an<br />
exogenous cue flashed. This phenomenon is called inhibition of return<br />
(IOR). To examine whether the magnitude of the interference effect<br />
would be modulated by IOR in the Stroop task, a color carrier, a<br />
color word, or neither of them was presented at the cued location 800,<br />
1,050, or 1,300 msec after an exogenous cue flashed. <strong>The</strong> Stroop effect<br />
was largest when nothing was presented at the cued location, intermediate<br />
when the color carrier was, and smallest when a color word<br />
was at 1,050-msec SOA. However, this interaction disappeared at<br />
800-msec and 1,300-msec SOAs. This reduced Stroop effect is due to<br />
the stimulus not being processed efficiently because of IOR, which is<br />
supposed to provoke lack of attention.<br />
(1036)<br />
Biologically Significant Stimuli Produce Visual Prior Entry.<br />
GREG L. WEST, ADAM A. K. ANDERSON, & JAY PRATT, University<br />
of Toronto (sponsored by Jay Pratt)—It remains unclear whether<br />
biologically significant stimuli, such as neutral or threatening faces,<br />
receive attention prior in time to other contemporaneous stimuli. Visual<br />
prior entry, as measured by temporal order judgments (TOJs),<br />
rests on the premise that allocated attention accelerates perception;<br />
that is, attended stimuli are perceived before unattended stimuli, and<br />
thus this method is a sensitive and direct measure of attentional capture.<br />
We demonstrate, using a novel TOJ paradigm without cues, that<br />
schematic faces of both neutral and angry emotional valence show visual<br />
prior entry effects; that is, these stimuli are perceived prior in<br />
time in comparison with competing stimuli. We further extend these<br />
results by contrasting effects produced both by schematic and real<br />
face stimuli. This study provides direct evidence that biologically significant<br />
stimuli, in schematic or photographic form, bias the contents<br />
of awareness and thus are perceived prior in time.<br />
(1037)<br />
Learning to Flexibly Dual-Task: When Single-Task Automaticity<br />
Is and Is Not Enough. NICOLE M. HILL & WALTER S. SCHNEIDER,<br />
University of Pittsburgh (sponsored by James Voss)—Dual processing<br />
theory predicts that controlled but not automatically processed<br />
single-task performance will decline in a dual-task context. However,<br />
declines in a dual-task context occur regardless of processing mode.<br />
We posit that (1) single-task learning is necessary but not sufficient<br />
for automatic dual-task performance, (2) extensive dual-task practice<br />
develops dual-task automatic processing, and (3) automatic dual-tasks<br />
can be flexibly performed—that is, novel dual-task combinations<br />
(NDTC) and single-trained-only targets (STOT). Ninety stimuli/sec<br />
were presented in a display containing four distinct tasks. Single-todual<br />
transfer resulted in declining performance; training nearly attenuated<br />
this decline. <strong>The</strong> NDTC and STOT conditions produced a modest<br />
dual-task cost relative to untrained dual-tasking. This suggests that<br />
single-task (consistent) training retains a degree of controlled processing<br />
that was released by dual-task training; furthermore, performance<br />
became flexible and remained high-level despite task alterations.<br />
(1038)<br />
A Word Choice: <strong>The</strong> Effect of Emotion on Lexical Decision and<br />
Accuracy. JOSEPH M. BAKER & STEPHEN R. SCHMIDT, Middle<br />
Tennessee State University (sponsored by Stephen R. Schmidt)—Past<br />
56<br />
research has failed to show significant lexical decision reaction time<br />
differences between emotional and nonemotional words. It is possible<br />
that the relatively long stimulus presentations employed in earlier<br />
studies were responsible for these null effects. In order to investigate<br />
the role of stimulus durations in the lexical decision task, emotional,<br />
neutral, and nonwords were presented to participants randomly in one<br />
of four stimulus durations (e.g., 30, 50, 75, and 100 msec). Emotional<br />
words were responded to faster than neutral and nonwords. Also, participants<br />
were more accurate in identifying emotional words than neutral<br />
words within all presentation durations, with the largest difference<br />
occurring within the 30-msec presentation duration. <strong>The</strong>se results<br />
suggest that lexical decision reaction time differences do exist between<br />
emotional and neutral words, as well as supporting findings that<br />
suggest that emotional words are attended to faster than neutral words.<br />
(1039)<br />
Deviations of Pointing Movements Toward the Irrelevant Stimulus<br />
Location in Vertical and Horizontal Simon Tasks. SIMONA BUETTI<br />
& DIRK KERZEL, University of Geneva—In the Simon effect (SE),<br />
responses to the color of a stimulus are faster when the irrelevant position<br />
of the colored stimulus is congruent with the response location.<br />
<strong>The</strong> SE decreases with increasing reaction times (RTs) for horizontal,<br />
but not for vertical, stimulus arrangements. Consistent with RTs, the<br />
lateralized readiness potential (LRP) shows an early deflection in incongruent<br />
trials of horizontal, but not vertical, Simon tasks. We observed<br />
that the trajectories of pointing movements were attracted by<br />
the irrelevant stimulus position. Furthermore, deviations toward the<br />
irrelevant stimulus decreased with increasing RT for both horizontal<br />
and vertical Simon tasks. Thus, the SE in movement parameters mirrored<br />
the time course in RTs for horizontal, but not vertical, stimulus<br />
arrangements. <strong>The</strong>se results suggest that the early deflection in LRPs<br />
may underlie the time course of the SE in RTs, but not the SE in movement<br />
trajectories.<br />
(1040)<br />
A Task-Difficulty Artifact in Subliminal Priming. MICHAEL S.<br />
PRATTE & JEFFREY N. ROUDER, University of Missouri, Columbia<br />
(sponsored by Jeffrey N. Rouder)—Subliminal priming is said to<br />
occur when a subliminal prime influences the identification of a subsequent<br />
target. Most subliminal priming claims are based on separate<br />
target and prime identification tasks. We argue that because prime<br />
identification is difficult, participants’ motivation wanes and, consequently,<br />
prime-identification performance suffers. Identification of<br />
weak stimuli may, therefore, appear at chance. To test this artifact, we<br />
increased the ease of the prime-identification task by intermixing easy<br />
(visible) primes with difficult (near liminal) ones. In Experiment 1,<br />
this strategy of intermixing easy primes is shown to raise identification<br />
of the difficult ones. In Experiment 2, prime duration was lowered<br />
such that prime identification was near chance in intermixed presentations.<br />
Under these conditions, we fail to observe any priming<br />
effects. Hence, previous demonstrations of subliminal priming may<br />
simply reflect a task difficulty artifact.<br />
(1041)<br />
Coding Strategies in Number Space. OLIVER LINDEMANN, Radboud<br />
University, JUAN M. ABOLAFIA, Miguel Hernandez University,<br />
JAY PRATT, University of Toronto, & HAROLD BEKKERING,<br />
Radboud University Nijmegen (sponsored by Harold Bekkering)—<br />
<strong>The</strong> present study investigates the impact of task demands on the association<br />
of spatial and numerical response codes (SNARC effect).<br />
Participants were instructed to memorize three simultaneously presented<br />
Arabic digits describing a left-to-right ascending number sequence,<br />
a descending sequence, or a disordered sequence. Afterward,<br />
participants indicated the parity status of a centrally presented digit.<br />
As the response latencies showed, SNARC effects in the parity task<br />
were mediated by the coding requirements of memory tasks. That is,<br />
SNARC effects were present only after memorizing ascending or disordered<br />
number sequences but disappeared after processing descend-