S1 (FriAM 1-65) - The Psychonomic Society
S1 (FriAM 1-65) - The Psychonomic Society
S1 (FriAM 1-65) - The Psychonomic Society
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Saturday Noon Posters 4048–4054<br />
that, although listeners tend to not ignore salient irrelevant properties,<br />
experience and knowledge both have an effect on the use of specific<br />
relevant properties. <strong>The</strong> results will be discussed in terms of the degree<br />
to which individual properties can be altered.<br />
(4048)<br />
Brief Meditation Training and Its Effects on Pain Perception.<br />
FADEL Z. ZEIDAN, NAKIA S. GORDON, & PAULA GOOLKASIAN,<br />
University of North Carolina, Charlotte—Long-term meditation practice<br />
attenuates responses to experimental pain (Kaikigi et al., 2005).<br />
Meditation may reduce pain perception by serving as a distraction; inducing<br />
a relaxation response (Lazar et al., 2000); or enhancing ability<br />
to cognitively shift attention from pain (Orme-Johnson et al.,<br />
2006). <strong>The</strong>se issues have been explored largely in adept meditators<br />
(Kabat-Zinn et al., 1985). We examined the effects of 3 consecutive<br />
days of 20-min mindfulness meditation training on pain perception to<br />
electrical stimulation. A comparison group tested under relaxation<br />
and arithmetic distraction conditions was also included. <strong>The</strong> results<br />
demonstrated that brief meditation intervention significantly reduced<br />
pain perception in comparison with relaxation and distraction. <strong>The</strong>se<br />
findings suggest that pain perception can be attenuated after only<br />
60 min of meditation instruction. <strong>The</strong> cognitive aspect of meditation<br />
practice may play a role in this effect.<br />
(4049)<br />
Presentation Order of Comparison and Standard Stimulus Affects<br />
the Difference Threshold. EINAT LAPID & ROLF ULRICH, University<br />
of Tübingen, & THOMAS RAMMSAYER, University of Bern—<br />
In determining the difference threshold (i.e., the just noticeable difference)<br />
in temporal discrimination tasks, subjects are typically asked<br />
to compare a constant standard stimulus with a variable comparison<br />
stimulus. This task allows one to establish a psychometric function<br />
from which the difference threshold is calculated. <strong>The</strong> psychophysical<br />
results of our experiments showed that the presentation order of<br />
the comparison and the standard could strongly influence the size of<br />
this threshold. A mathematical model can account for this order effect.<br />
It assumes that subjects average stimulus information across trials<br />
to establish a stable internal representation of the standard. This<br />
model also accounts for our finding that difference thresholds determined<br />
by a two-alternative forced-choice task are larger than thresholds<br />
determined by the classical method of constant stimuli.<br />
(4050)<br />
Does Norwich’s Entropy <strong>The</strong>ory of Perception Actually Generate<br />
the Stevens’ and Weber–Fechner Laws? IFTIKHAR R. NIZAMI—<br />
Norwich’s “entropy equation,” supposedly derived from information<br />
theory, relates sensation strength to stimulus strength. At “low”<br />
strengths, the relation is approximately logarithmic—“the Weber–<br />
Fechner law”—and at “high” strengths, approximately a power function—“Stevens’<br />
law.” “Low” and “high” must be established through<br />
curve fitting, because the entropy equation has three unknowns, including<br />
a power exponent (y), allegedly “Stevens’ exponent” (x). To<br />
test whether y = x, the logarithmic forms of the entropy equation and<br />
Stevens’ Law were regression-fitted to 64 published plots of logarithm(magnitude-estimate)<br />
versus logarithm(stimulus-strength).<br />
y versus x is broadly scattered; 62/64 times, y � x. In theory, the fitted<br />
entropy equation allows calculation of the transmitted information.<br />
Constraining the fit to yield 2.5 bits/stimulus narrows the scatterplot<br />
so that, roughly, y = 1.7x. Neither the Weber–Fechner nor the<br />
Stevens approximations fully describe any examined sensationgrowth<br />
plot. Quantification of sensation growth by “physical entropy”<br />
(Norwich, Acta Biotheoretica, 2005) repeats these errors.<br />
• EVENT COGNITION •<br />
(4051)<br />
Cognitive Biases in Estimating the Similarity of Environmental<br />
Sounds. BRUNO L. GIORDANO, STEPHEN MCADAMS, & JOHN<br />
112<br />
MCDONNELL, McGill University—Relevant auditory features for<br />
the perception of sound events are often studied using similarity ratings.<br />
Acoustical features for perception are inferred from the association<br />
between similarities and acoustical parameters. This approach<br />
might lead to mistaken conclusions if participants are influenced by<br />
the similarity of the knowledge structures activated by the recognition<br />
of the sound source (e.g., train whistling, train wheels). <strong>The</strong> comparative<br />
relevance of acoustical and conceptual information to the estimation<br />
of the similarity of animate and inanimate environmental<br />
sounds was measured. Similarities were measured using the agglomerative<br />
hierarchical sorting technique. Participants judged either identification<br />
labels, or the acoustical properties of the sounds, or the<br />
sounds without further specification of the response criteria (conceptual,<br />
acoustical, and unbiased conditions, respectively). Unbiased estimation<br />
of the similarity of animate and inanimate sound events resembled<br />
more closely conceptual and acoustical similarities,<br />
respectively. Methodological and theoretical consequences are<br />
discussed.<br />
(4052)<br />
Using Autobiographical Memory Questionnaires As a Form of Exposure<br />
<strong>The</strong>rapy for Stressful Events. LISA M. HATHAWAY &<br />
ADRIEL BOALS, University of North Texas—<strong>The</strong> present study investigated<br />
whether completing the autobiographical memory questionnaire<br />
(AMQ) for a stressful event results in a reduction in the emotionality<br />
and vividness of the event. At Time 1, 190 participants<br />
nominated a negative event from their lives. Participants in the experimental<br />
group completed the AMQ in reference to their nominated<br />
event, whereas the control group nominated six other events. Six<br />
weeks later, participants in both groups completed the AMQ in regards<br />
to the negative event nominated at Time 1. Participants in the<br />
experimental group reported significantly less emotional intensity and<br />
vividness of the event at Time 2, in comparison with the control group.<br />
No such pattern of group differences was observed for a second nominated<br />
stressful event also completed during Time 2. <strong>The</strong>se results<br />
suggest that completing the AMQ for a stressful memory results in a<br />
decrease in the emotional intensity and vividness of the event.<br />
(4053)<br />
Actor Similarity and Binding Errors in Event Memory. JULIE L.<br />
EARLES, ALAN W. KERSTEN, EILEEN S. CURTAYNE, &<br />
JONATHAN G. PERLE, Florida Atlantic University—Mistakes in<br />
eyewitness identification can occur when an eyewitness incorrectly<br />
associates a familiar actor with the actions of another person. <strong>The</strong><br />
present research demonstrates that actors do not need to be similar in<br />
appearance for such binding errors to occur. <strong>The</strong> actors can in fact be<br />
very different in appearance, even different sexes. Participants attempted<br />
to remember a series of brief events, each involving an actor<br />
performing a simple action. Participants were tested one week later<br />
on their recognition memory for the events. Increases in actor similarity<br />
led to increases in binding errors, in which participants falsely<br />
recognized a familiar actor performing a familiar action that had actually<br />
been performed by someone else. Binding errors often occurred<br />
even when the familiar actor was of a different sex than the original<br />
actor, however, providing strong evidence that these binding errors are<br />
not due solely to actor similarity.<br />
(4054)<br />
Freshman Flashbulbs: Exploring Flashbulb Memory Mechanisms in<br />
a Collegiate Sample. JENNIFER M. TALARICO, Lafayette College—<br />
Pilot data from the class of 2010 suggests that memories of distinctive,<br />
emotional, and personally significant events concerning the transition<br />
to college (e.g., meeting one’s roommate or attending one’s first<br />
collegiate class) satisfy the criteria for “flashbulb memory” status;<br />
participants remembered where they were, what they were doing, and<br />
had vivid visual images for these memories. In addition, they were<br />
quite confident that the event occurred as they remembered it. This<br />
allows for the exploration of potential mechanisms for the flashbulb