29.01.2013 Views

detection of heavy metals by using a composite sensor ... - Lirmm

detection of heavy metals by using a composite sensor ... - Lirmm

detection of heavy metals by using a composite sensor ... - Lirmm

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DETECTION OF HEAVY METALS BY USING A COMPOSITE SENSOR<br />

BASED ON A BUILT-IN BISMUTH PRECURSOR<br />

M.T. Castañeda, 1, * B. Pérez, M. Pumera, M. del Valle, A.Merkoçi, S. Alegret<br />

Grup de Sensors i Bio<strong>sensor</strong>s, Departament de Química, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193<br />

Bellaterra, Catalonia, Spain,<br />

1 On leave from: Departamento de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Azcapotzalco, Av.<br />

San Pablo 180, Col. Reynosa Tamaulipas 022000, México, D. F., MÉXICO.<br />

* Corresponding author; email: tcb@correo.azc.uam.mx, tel: 34-93581 2118, fax: 34-93581 2379<br />

Abstract: A new graphite-epoxy <strong>composite</strong> electrode (GECE) containing Bi(NO3)3 as built-in bismuth precursor<br />

for simultaneous and individual anodic stripping analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>heavy</strong> trace <strong>metals</strong> is reported. The developed<br />

Bi(NO3)3-GECE is compatible with bismuth film electrodes reported previously, including the <strong>composite</strong><br />

electrodes (Bi-GECE) recently reported <strong>by</strong> our group. The sensitive response, combined with the minimal<br />

toxicity <strong>of</strong> the Bi(NO3)3 allow its utilization in environmental quality monitoring as well as other applications.<br />

Keywords: bismuth nitrate, graphite-epoxy <strong>composite</strong> electrode, <strong>heavy</strong> <strong>metals</strong>.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Mercury-modified electrodes coupled with stripping<br />

techniques have been recognised as the most<br />

sensitive methods for determination <strong>of</strong> <strong>heavy</strong><br />

<strong>metals</strong> [1]. However, the potential dangers<br />

associated with mercury have led to developing<br />

mercury-free <strong>sensor</strong>s. Unmodified electrodes like<br />

bare carbon, gold or iridium [2-4], graphite-epoxi<br />

<strong>composite</strong>s [5-7], recordable CD [8] or silver-plated<br />

rotograved carbon electrodes [9] have been used<br />

as an alternative to mercury based electrodes.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the excited alternatives to mercury based<br />

electrodes is that based on bismuth [10]. Our group<br />

have configured Bi-GECE [11], based on graphiteepoxy<br />

<strong>composite</strong> electrode (GECE) without<br />

modification but bismuth film formation due to the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> bismuth in the measuring solution. In<br />

the present work we present a novel configuration,<br />

Bi(NO3)3-GECE that represents GECE modified<br />

internally with bismuth nitrate salt which serves as<br />

built-in bismuth precursor for bismuth film<br />

formation. This represents an integrated<br />

configuration <strong>of</strong> bismuth based GECEs for stripping<br />

analysis. The low toxicity <strong>of</strong> bismuth makes it an<br />

alternative material to mercury in terms <strong>of</strong> trace<br />

metal determination.<br />

EXPERIMENTAL<br />

The lead and cadmium stock solutions were<br />

prepared <strong>by</strong> dissolving the corresponding nitrates<br />

in water obtained from an ion-exchange system<br />

Milli-Q (Millipore). Acetate buffer (0.1 M, pH 4.5) or<br />

HCl 0.5 M were used as supporting electrolyte. The<br />

Bi(NO3)3GECE were prepared <strong>using</strong> graphite<br />

powder with a particle size <strong>of</strong> 50 µm (BDH, UK),<br />

Epotek H77 (epoxy resin), hardener (both from<br />

Epoxy Technology, USA) and Bi(NO3)3 (Aldrich).<br />

Graphite powder and Bi(NO3)3 salt were first mixed<br />

together. The obtained dried mixture was mixed<br />

well with epoxy resin (mixed with hardener) in a<br />

ratio <strong>of</strong> 1:4 (w/w) as described in a previous work<br />

[12,13]. The percentage <strong>of</strong> Bi(NO3)3 in the prepared<br />

paste was varied being 0.1, 0.5, and 2.0 % (w/w).<br />

The resulting Bi(NO3)3 containing graphite-epoxy<br />

paste was placed into a PVC cylindrical sleeve<br />

body (6 mm i. d.), which has an inner electrical<br />

copper contact, to a depth <strong>of</strong> 3 mm. The conducting<br />

<strong>composite</strong> material glued to the copper contact was<br />

cured at 40 ºC during one week. Before each use,<br />

the surface <strong>of</strong> the electrode was wet with doubly<br />

distilled water and then thoroughly smoothed, first<br />

with abrasive paper and then with alumina paper<br />

(polishing strips 301044-001, Orion).<br />

A platinum auxiliary electrode (model 52-67 1,<br />

Crison, Spain) and double junction Ag/AgCl<br />

reference electrode (Orion 900200) with 0.1 M KCl<br />

as external reference solution and the Bi(NO3)3-<br />

GECE as working electrode were used. The square<br />

wave anodic stripping voltammetry (SWASV)<br />

experiments were performed <strong>using</strong> an Autolab<br />

PGSTAT 20 System (Eco-chemie, The<br />

Netherlands). A Hitachi S-570, Japan Scanning<br />

Electron Microscope (SEM) was used to observe<br />

the surface <strong>of</strong> the working electrodes.<br />

SWASV measurements were carried out in the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> dissolved oxygen. The three<br />

electrodes were immersed into the electrochemical<br />

cell containing 25 mL 0.1 mL 0.1 M acetate buffer<br />

(pH 4.5). The deposition potential <strong>of</strong> -1.3 V was<br />

applied to Bi(NO3)3-GECE while the solution was<br />

stirred. Following 120 s deposition step, the stirring<br />

was stopped and after 15 s equilibration, the<br />

voltammogram was recorded <strong>by</strong> applying a squarewave<br />

potential scan between -1.3 and -0.3 V with a<br />

frequency <strong>of</strong> 50 Hz, amplitude <strong>of</strong> 20 mV and<br />

potential step <strong>of</strong> 20 mV.<br />

Aliquots <strong>of</strong> the target metal standard solution were<br />

introduced after recording the background<br />

voltammograms. A 60 s conditioning step at +0.6 V<br />

(with solution stirring) was used to remove the<br />

remaining reduced target <strong>metals</strong> and bismuth, prior<br />

to the next cycle. The electrodes were washed<br />

thoroughly with deionized water between each test.


Measurements in phosphate buffer for the study <strong>of</strong><br />

pH effect as well as in HCl medium were also<br />

performed in the same experimental conditions as<br />

described above.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

The surface morphologies <strong>of</strong> Bi(NO3)3-GECEs<br />

(containing different quantities <strong>of</strong> Bi(NO3)3 salt)<br />

before and after the preconcentration step<br />

(electrolysis at -1.3 V during 120 s) were observed<br />

<strong>by</strong> Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM).<br />

As can be seen, the surfaces <strong>of</strong> Bi(NO3)3-GECE,<br />

with different concentration <strong>of</strong> Bi(NO3)3, before<br />

preconcentration step (Fig. 1 A) appears to have<br />

clusters <strong>of</strong> conducting material gathered in random<br />

areas. This is due to the graphite particles<br />

randomly distributed and randomly oriented in the<br />

epoxy resin [14]. Microcrystalline Bi(NO3)3 particles<br />

should be also distributed randomly but due to the<br />

very low percentage (0.1 to 2.0 %, w/w) were not<br />

visible. The darker coverage <strong>of</strong> the same Bi(NO3)3-<br />

GECEs after preconcentration step (Fig. 1 B)<br />

compared to Bi(NO3)3-GECE before<br />

preconcentration (Fig. 1 A) is clearly visible. This is<br />

due to the bismuth film formation coming from the<br />

Bi(NO3)3 salt inside the <strong>sensor</strong> matrix.<br />

The quantity <strong>of</strong> Bi(NO3)3 didn’t have any visible<br />

effect on the <strong>sensor</strong> surface. The images 1 B (a-c)<br />

have similar darkness. Seems that for the Bi(NO3)3<br />

quantities used the bismuth film has the same<br />

configuration.<br />

For all the Bi(NO3)3-GECEs after the<br />

preconcentration step there can be also seen<br />

dimensional fibril-like networks onto their surfaces<br />

which is in correlation with the early report <strong>of</strong> Bi-film<br />

at carbon surface [10]. The black and thick<br />

appearances <strong>of</strong> bismuth deposit can be attributed<br />

to carbon substrate that has positive effect on the<br />

nucleation and growth <strong>of</strong> the bismuth film. The<br />

same deposition <strong>of</strong> bismuth was clearly observed<br />

for GECE used in connection with bismuth in<br />

measuring solution.<br />

The characteristics <strong>of</strong> the electrodes must be very<br />

dependent on the amounts <strong>of</strong> Bi(NO3)3 used for the<br />

Bi(NO3)3-GECEs preparation.<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> Bi(NO3)3 loadings (0.1-2.0 %, w/w) in<br />

the SWASV <strong>of</strong> the resulting Bi(NO3)3-GECEs were<br />

studied for a 70 ppb solution <strong>of</strong> Pb 2+ at 0.1 M<br />

acetate buffer pH 4.5. The increase <strong>of</strong> Bi(NO3)3<br />

content in the <strong>composite</strong> electrode increase the<br />

bismuth ion release during the contact with the<br />

measuring solution, and consequently the bismuth<br />

film formation capability. On the other hand, the<br />

higher Bi(NO3)3 content may reduce the<br />

conductivity <strong>of</strong> the Bi(NO3)3–GECE. A maxim<br />

response was observed for Bi(NO3)3-GECE<br />

containing 0.1 % Bi(NO3)3.<br />

The stripping performance <strong>of</strong> Bi(NO3)3-GECE was<br />

tested for lead and cadmium and the resulting<br />

voltammograms are showed in Fig.2. The Figure<br />

demonstrates the square wave stripping<br />

voltammograms for increasing concentration <strong>of</strong><br />

cadmium (A) in 10 µg L -1 steps (b–j) and lead (B) in<br />

10 µg L -1 steps (b–h). Also shown are the<br />

corresponding blank voltammograms (a) and the<br />

calibration plots (right) over the ranges 10 – 90 µg<br />

L -1 cadmium and 10 – 70 µg L -1 lead. The Bi(NO3)3-<br />

GECE displays well-defined and single peaks for<br />

cadmium (Ep = -0.76 V) and lead (Ep = -0.54 V).<br />

Detection limits <strong>of</strong> 7.23 and 11.81 µg L -1 can be<br />

estimated for cadmium and lead respectively based<br />

on the upper limit approach (ULA) [15]. Also in the<br />

concentration ranges mentioned above, the<br />

calibration plots (right) were linear exhibiting the R<br />

values <strong>of</strong> 0.9968 and 0.9953 for cadmium and lead<br />

respectively.<br />

As in the case <strong>of</strong> Bi-GECE the bismuth film<br />

formation onto Bi(NO3)3-GECE is shown to be a<br />

homogenous and uniform one due to the novel<br />

supporting material. The rich microstructure <strong>of</strong><br />

Bi(NO3)3-GECE, composed <strong>of</strong> a mixture <strong>of</strong> carbon<br />

microparticles forming internal microarrays might<br />

have a pr<strong>of</strong>ound effect upon the bismuth film<br />

structural features. The obtained peak widths <strong>of</strong> 20<br />

mV for lead and cadmium were similar to other<br />

bismuth film electrodes reported previously.<br />

The simultaneous measuring <strong>of</strong> lead and cadmium<br />

with Bi(NO3)3-GECE was also performed as shown<br />

at Fig.3. This figure displays square wave stripping<br />

voltammograms for cadmium (Ep= -0.72 V) and<br />

lead (Ep= -0.54 V) for increasing concentrations in<br />

10 µg L -1 steps (Pb) and 20 µg L -1 steps (Cd) (b–e).<br />

The well resolved peaks increase linearly with the<br />

metal concentration. The voltammogram clearly<br />

indicates that these <strong>metals</strong> can be measured<br />

simultaneously following a short deposition time <strong>of</strong><br />

2 min. In the concentration range from 10-40 µg Pb<br />

L -1 and 20-80 µg Cd L -1 the stripping signals<br />

remained undistorted and the resulting calibrating<br />

plots <strong>of</strong> this concentration range are linear<br />

exhibiting the R values <strong>of</strong> 0.9562 and 0.9762<br />

respectively, for lead and cadmium. Detection limits<br />

<strong>of</strong> around 19.1 and 35.8 µg L -1 can be estimated for<br />

lead and cadmium respectively based on the same<br />

method [15].<br />

A more sensitive measurement was observed for<br />

lead at 0.5 M HCl as measuring solution. Fig.4<br />

represent typical subtractive square-wave stripping<br />

voltammograms (removing blanks) for increasing<br />

concentration <strong>of</strong> lead ranging from 1 to 10 µg L -1<br />

steps (a–h). Also the calibration plot (right) over the<br />

studied range, is shown. This highly sensitive<br />

response in HCl medium, as expected also from


a<br />

b<br />

c<br />

the study <strong>of</strong> the pH effect is probably related to an<br />

improved bismuth release and alloy formation in<br />

this medium.<br />

The stability <strong>of</strong> the Bi(NO3)3-GECEs in 10<br />

consecutive measurements for 50 ppb cadmium in<br />

0.1 M acetate buffer <strong>of</strong> pH 4.5 and <strong>using</strong> the same<br />

surface was tested. It was observed that the<br />

reproducibility <strong>of</strong> the obtained current peak was<br />

comparable with that <strong>of</strong> the Bi-GECE [11]<br />

developed previously, that uses bismuth solution. It<br />

seems that the Bi precursor in the Bi(NO3)3-GECEs<br />

surface keeps ensuring the same <strong>heavy</strong> metal<br />

preconcentration. The relative standard deviation <strong>of</strong><br />

this measurement was 9.33 %.<br />

Although the Bi(NO3)3 particles were not uniform in<br />

size they were expected to be exposed in a<br />

reproducible way onto the freshly obtained<br />

Bi(NO3)3-GECE surfaces after each mechanical<br />

polishing procedure. This was confirmed <strong>by</strong><br />

checking the reproducibility <strong>of</strong> the measurements<br />

for a series <strong>of</strong> 10 different surfaces <strong>of</strong> the same<br />

Bi(NO3)3-GECE. The relative standard deviations <strong>of</strong><br />

these measurements performed in the same<br />

experimental conditions as for the stability study<br />

was 10.69% for cadmium measurements.<br />

A B<br />

50 µm<br />

Fig.1 Scanning electron microscopy images for Bi(NO3)3-<br />

GECE before (A) and after (B) the preconcentration step<br />

from solutions <strong>of</strong> 0.1 M acetate buffer (pH 4.5) at -1.3 V<br />

during 120 s. All electrode surfaces have been polished<br />

in the same way as explained in the text. The same<br />

accelerated voltage (10 kV) and resolution (10 µm) were<br />

used. The Bi(NO3)3 concentrations in the prepared<br />

<strong>sensor</strong>s were 0.1 (a), 0.5 (b) and 2.0 % (c) (w/w).<br />

A<br />

B<br />

5µA<br />

Fig2. Square-wave stripping voltammograms for<br />

increasing concentration <strong>of</strong> cadmium (A) in 10 µg L -1<br />

steps (b – h) and lead (B) in 10 µg/L steps (b – j). Also<br />

are shown the corresponding blank voltammograms<br />

(a) and the calibration plots (right) over the ranges 10<br />

– 90 µg L -1 cadmium and 10 – 70 µg L -1 lead.<br />

Solutions 0.1 M acetate buffer (pH 4.5). Square-wave<br />

voltammetric scan with a frequency <strong>of</strong> 50 Hz, potential<br />

step <strong>of</strong> 20 mV and amplitude <strong>of</strong> 20 mV. Deposition<br />

potential <strong>of</strong> -1.3 V during 120 s.<br />

10µA<br />

Cd<br />

Pb<br />

d<br />

c<br />

b<br />

a<br />

e<br />

-0.9 -0.7 -0.5<br />

j<br />

i<br />

h hh<br />

g gg<br />

f<br />

e<br />

d<br />

c<br />

b bb<br />

a<br />

-1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4<br />

10µA<br />

d<br />

c<br />

h<br />

g<br />

f<br />

e<br />

b<br />

b<br />

a<br />

-0.7 -0.6 -0.5 -0.4 -0.3<br />

e<br />

I (µA)<br />

I (µA)<br />

14.0<br />

10.0<br />

40 40.0<br />

20 20.0<br />

00.0<br />

16<br />

12<br />

Cd<br />

10 30 50 70<br />

Fig. 3 Determination <strong>of</strong> cadmium and lead for increasing<br />

concentrations in 10 µg L -1 steps (Pb) and 20 µg L -1<br />

steps (Cd); concentration ranges <strong>of</strong> 10 – 40 (Pb) and 20<br />

– 80 (Cd) µg L -1 . Also is shown the blank (a) and the<br />

corresponding calibration plots. Experimental conditions<br />

as in Fig. 2.<br />

6.0<br />

2.0<br />

50<br />

30<br />

10<br />

8<br />

4<br />

0<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100<br />

E (V) [Cd 2+ ] (µg L -1 )<br />

I (µA)<br />

0 20 40 60<br />

E (V) [Pb 2+ ] (µg L -1 )<br />

Pb<br />

E (V) [Pb 2+ ], [Cd 2+ ] (µg L -1 )


10µA<br />

h<br />

g<br />

f<br />

e<br />

d<br />

c<br />

b<br />

a<br />

I (µA)<br />

-0.7 -0.6 -0.5 -0.4 -0.3<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

Fig. 4 Square-wave stripping voltammograms for<br />

increasing concentration <strong>of</strong> lead: (a) 1, (b) 2, (c) 3, (d) 4,<br />

(e) 5, (f) 8, (g) 9, (h) 10 µg L -1 . Also is shown the<br />

corresponding calibration plot (right) over the range 1–10<br />

µg L -1 lead. The measuring solution was 0.5 M HCl.<br />

Other experimental conditions as in Fig. 2.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10<br />

A novel GECE that incorporates Bi(NO3)3 salt in the<br />

sensing matrix is developed. The resulted Bi(NO3)3-<br />

GECE is compatible with bismuth-film electrodes<br />

for use in stripping analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>heavy</strong> <strong>metals</strong>. The<br />

built-in bismuth property is the distinctive feature <strong>of</strong><br />

this Bi(NO3)3 modified GECE which can be utilized<br />

for the generation <strong>of</strong> bismuth adjacent to the<br />

electrode surface.<br />

The developed Bi(NO3)3-GECE is related with an<br />

in-situ bismuth ions generation and film formation<br />

without the necessity <strong>of</strong> external addition <strong>of</strong> the<br />

bismuth in the measuring solution. The good<br />

stability (9.33 % for cadmium measurements) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Bi(NO3)3-GECE is owing to the unique surface<br />

morphology resulting in enhanced contact between<br />

the GECE matrix and the electrochemically<br />

reduced bismuth. Moreover, the surface <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Bi(NO3)3-GECE could be renewed easily <strong>by</strong> simple<br />

polishing so that the utility <strong>of</strong> the <strong>sensor</strong> is<br />

improved.<br />

5<br />

0<br />

E (V) [Pb2+ ] (µg L-1 E (V) [Pb )<br />

2+ ] (µg L-1 )<br />

The convenience <strong>of</strong> this built-in bismuth <strong>sensor</strong> in<br />

voltammetric analysis will be greatly improved if<br />

this novel <strong>composite</strong> should be used <strong>by</strong> screen<br />

printed technology. The utilization <strong>of</strong> the Bi(NO3)3-<br />

GECE for real <strong>heavy</strong> metal samples along with<br />

other applications are underway in our laboratory.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. J. Wang, Stripping Analysis; VCH Publishers:<br />

Deerfield Beach, 1985.<br />

2. E. Achterberg, P.; Braungardt, Anal. Chim. Acta<br />

400 (1999) 381.<br />

3. J. Wang, B. Tian. Anal. Chem. 65 (1993) 1529.<br />

4. M. A Nolan, S. P Kounaves, Anal. Chem. 71<br />

(1999) 3567.<br />

5. M. Serradell, S., Izquierdo, L. Moreno, A.<br />

Merkoçi, S. Alegret. Electroanalysis 14 (2002)<br />

1281.<br />

6. L. Moreno, A. Merkoçi, S. Alegret, Electrochim.<br />

Acta 48 (2003) 2599.<br />

7. S. Carrégalo, A. Merkoçi, S. Alegret,<br />

Microchimica Acta 147(2004) 245.<br />

8. L Angnes, E.M Richter, M.A. Augelli, G.H.<br />

Kume, Anal.Chem. 72 (2000) 5503.<br />

9. P.R.M Silva, El. Khakami, M. Chaker, A.<br />

Dufrense, F. Courchesne, Sensors and<br />

Actuators B. 76 (2001) 250.<br />

10. J. Wang, J. Lu, S.B. Hocevar, P.A.Farias, B.<br />

Ogorevc; Analytical Chemistry, 72 (2000) 3218.<br />

11. Ü.A.Kırgöz,S.Marín, M.Pumera, A.Merkoçi, S.<br />

Alegret; Electroanalysis 17 (2004) 881.<br />

12. M. Santandreu, F. Céspedes, S. Alegret, E.<br />

Martínez-Fàbregas; Analytical Chemistry 69<br />

(1997) 2080.<br />

13. A.Merkoçi, S. Braga, E. Fàbregas, S. Alegret,<br />

Analytica Chimica Acta 391 (1999) 65.<br />

14. S. Ramírez-García, S. Alegret, F. Céspedes,<br />

R.J. Forster, Analyst 127 (2002) 1512.<br />

15. J.Mocak, A.M. Bond, S. Mitchell, G. Scollary;<br />

Pure & Applied Chemistry 69 (1997) 297.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!