Integration of Conservation Strategies of Plant Genetic ... - Genres

Integration of Conservation Strategies of Plant Genetic ... - Genres Integration of Conservation Strategies of Plant Genetic ... - Genres

29.01.2013 Views

5.5. finalized projects in agriculture 5.6. national coordination 5.7. germnet project 6. Conclusions 1. Introduction The Mediterranean region is an important centre of origin of several cultivated species. It is an area where in the past a lot of varieties and different genic combinations arose, thanks to natural phenomena such as mutations, spontaneous hybridizations and polyploidy ( Scarascia Mugnozza, 1972 ). Unfortunately, most of this genetic diversity, accumulated through centuries, has been lost through the well known phenomenon of genetic erosion, which is due to several reasons but mostly to rapid spreading of few, new and modern varieties. Some examples may help in understanding the magnitude of the problem and the several actions undertaken by scientists, governments, national and international organizations in order to stop or to reduce genetic erosion. 1.1 Cereals In the case of cereals and in particular of wheats, in Sicily, at the beginning of the century, some researchers (De Cillis, 1927) listed as many as 289 wheat varieties; later on ( De Cillis, 1942 ) only 45 varieties were classified; more recently ( Perrino and Martignano, 1973; Perrino and Hammer, 1983 ) only 32 varieties, out of the previous 45, were recognized. If all the peninsula of Italy is considered more than 400 wheat varieties were cultivated before and soon after the second World War ( De Cillis, 1927; Ciferri and Bonvicini, 1959-1960 ). In the last twenty years, research carried out for collecting and preserving these old varieties have shown that only very few ( 1 - 2 % ) could be found ( Perrino, 1988, 1992a ). On the other hand the number of new, or relatively new, varieties is not only lower, about 200, but it is hard to believe that their genetic base and genetic distances are as large as those of the old ones. However, based on these results and other considerations, the loss of genetic diversity in wheat cultivation has been estimated to be of at least 90 % ( Perrino, 1992b ). Some questions are still on foot. How much of this 90% is really lost? How much of it has been transferred into modern varieties? How much of it was collected by previous explorers and actually preserved in gene banks or elsewhere? How much of that genetic diversity is present in the actual world collections stored in Leningrad, Fort Collins, Kyoto and Bari? No one can tell us if all of those old varieties collected, maintained for decades and studied by De Cillis, Ciferri, Bonvicini and others, were duplicated and included in the above mentioned world collections or lost for ever. For sure, some of those varieties were used by Italian and foreign breeders, so that some genes were saved and are still working in some new varieties in Italy and throughout the world. But, are they the most important genes? Are they enough for the agriculture of today and tomorrow? Whatever are or will be the answers, it is almost sure that scientists were right in starting preservation activities. 1.2 Vegetable crops In the case of vegetable crops the phenomenon of genetic erosion seems to have been less severe and especially for those not much modified from their wild forms. This may be the case of Taraxacum officinale, Foeniculum officinale, etc. It seems that low genetic erosion may have occurred for primitive

Plant genetic resources activities in Italy cultivars, though genetic introgression from improved varieties may have taken place for some crops. This may be the case of some Brassica species ( broccoli, cauliflower, etc. ). There must have been more genetic erosion and is more likely to occur in the future for vegetable crops for which the wild progenitor is unknown or is extinct, like onion, artichoke, etc., or for those introduced from other centres of origin, like tomato, spinach, etc.. The danger of genetic erosion seems to be lower for those vegetable crops that have been cultivated in Italy for centuries: carrot, onion, pea, lactuca, etc. However even in this case the introduction and spreading of F1 hybrids may have to be considered very carefully before concluding that these crops are less threatened ( Crisp and Astley, 1983; Astley et al, 1984; Maggioni and Soressi, 1992). In conclusion for most of the vegetable crops the possibility of preserving genetic diversity seems to be easier than for cereals. This may explain why, at least in the past, scientists paid less attention to the preservation of this group of crops. 1.3 Fruit trees In the case of fruit trees the very high number of varieties developed, through centuries, all over the peninsula, has been very much eroded, though quite a few specimens survive, here and there, in several regions of the peninsula. As for cereals, several researchers took care of their preservation and started serious studies on their variability and geographical distribution (Scaramuzzi, 1988). These examples of cereals, vegetable crops and fruit trees show that preservation of old varieties in Italy was one of the first actions to be taken. As already mentioned, that of wheat was the earliest because breeding activity was also started earlier or was more intensive than for other crops. Although, in Italy, preservation of plant genetic resources started very early this century, only later on, that is around 1960, the problem of loss of genetic diversity became very acute also at the international level. At least for herbaceous plants, it was reported ( Ciferri and Bonvicini, 1959 - 1960 ) that old varieties for some undesirable traits were substituted by new improved ones. However since the former were carrying traits that could have been useful in the future and they were going to disappear, the interest for their collection, investigation and conservation increased. Since, at the same time, breeders were engaged more and more in breeding activity and plant genetic conservation was becoming, more and more, a full time job, scientists, national and international organizations suggested the foundation of genebanks. At present, plant genetic resources activities in Italy concern "ex situ" and "in situ" conservation, besides collection, multiplication, characterization, evaluation, documentation, distribution and utilization. 2. "Ex situ" Conversation "Ex situ" conservation, generally known as genebanks, includes seed genebanks, field genebanks, botanic gardens, alpine gardens, arboreta and tissue culture (including cryoconservation), according to the method used to store samples of genetic stocks. 2.1 Seed genebanks In 1970, in Italy, the National Research Council (CNR) founded, in Bari, the Germplasm Institute with the main aims of collecting and preserving plant genetic resources of interest for Italian and

5.5. finalized projects in agriculture<br />

5.6. national coordination<br />

5.7. germnet project<br />

6. Conclusions<br />

1. Introduction<br />

The Mediterranean region is an important centre <strong>of</strong> origin <strong>of</strong> several cultivated species. It is an area<br />

where in the past a lot <strong>of</strong> varieties and different genic combinations arose, thanks to natural phenomena<br />

such as mutations, spontaneous hybridizations and polyploidy ( Scarascia Mugnozza, 1972 ).<br />

Unfortunately, most <strong>of</strong> this genetic diversity, accumulated through centuries, has been lost through the<br />

well known phenomenon <strong>of</strong> genetic erosion, which is due to several reasons but mostly to rapid<br />

spreading <strong>of</strong> few, new and modern varieties. Some examples may help in understanding the magnitude<br />

<strong>of</strong> the problem and the several actions undertaken by scientists, governments, national and international<br />

organizations in order to stop or to reduce genetic erosion.<br />

1.1 Cereals<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> cereals and in particular <strong>of</strong> wheats, in Sicily, at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the century, some<br />

researchers (De Cillis, 1927) listed as many as 289 wheat varieties; later on ( De Cillis, 1942 ) only 45<br />

varieties were classified; more recently ( Perrino and Martignano, 1973; Perrino and Hammer, 1983 )<br />

only 32 varieties, out <strong>of</strong> the previous 45, were recognized. If all the peninsula <strong>of</strong> Italy is considered more<br />

than 400 wheat varieties were cultivated before and soon after the second World War ( De Cillis, 1927;<br />

Ciferri and Bonvicini, 1959-1960 ). In the last twenty years, research carried out for collecting and<br />

preserving these old varieties have shown that only very few ( 1 - 2 % ) could be found ( Perrino, 1988,<br />

1992a ). On the other hand the number <strong>of</strong> new, or relatively new, varieties is not only lower, about 200,<br />

but it is hard to believe that their genetic base and genetic distances are as large as those <strong>of</strong> the old ones.<br />

However, based on these results and other considerations, the loss <strong>of</strong> genetic diversity in wheat<br />

cultivation has been estimated to be <strong>of</strong> at least 90 % ( Perrino, 1992b ). Some questions are still on foot.<br />

How much <strong>of</strong> this 90% is really lost? How much <strong>of</strong> it has been transferred into modern varieties? How<br />

much <strong>of</strong> it was collected by previous explorers and actually preserved in gene banks or elsewhere? How<br />

much <strong>of</strong> that genetic diversity is present in the actual world collections stored in Leningrad, Fort Collins,<br />

Kyoto and Bari? No one can tell us if all <strong>of</strong> those old varieties collected, maintained for decades and<br />

studied by De Cillis, Ciferri, Bonvicini and others, were duplicated and included in the above mentioned<br />

world collections or lost for ever. For sure, some <strong>of</strong> those varieties were used by Italian and foreign<br />

breeders, so that some genes were saved and are still working in some new varieties in Italy and<br />

throughout the world. But, are they the most important genes? Are they enough for the agriculture <strong>of</strong><br />

today and tomorrow? Whatever are or will be the answers, it is almost sure that scientists were right in<br />

starting preservation activities.<br />

1.2 Vegetable crops<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> vegetable crops the phenomenon <strong>of</strong> genetic erosion seems to have been less severe and<br />

especially for those not much modified from their wild forms. This may be the case <strong>of</strong> Taraxacum<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficinale, Foeniculum <strong>of</strong>ficinale, etc. It seems that low genetic erosion may have occurred for primitive

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!