Integration of Conservation Strategies of Plant Genetic ... - Genres

Integration of Conservation Strategies of Plant Genetic ... - Genres Integration of Conservation Strategies of Plant Genetic ... - Genres

29.01.2013 Views

public awareness. The group also stressed the need for genebanks to document aspects of usage and cultivation in addition to phenology and provenance. Participants discussed examples from around the world, particularly less-developed countries, of collaborations between genebanks, breeders and farmers, to use existing plant genetic resources to create new varieties shaped by the needs of the farmers. While there was much debate on the nature and value systems of different modes of agriculture, and the need for land reform, the group was generally reluctant to enter into this kind of on-farm use of plant genetic resources. During group discussions several questions for further consideration were raised. Many might usefully form the subjects of future meetings and of efforts to gather and collate material. A sample of these topics would include: • Can farmers regenerate genebank stocks efficiently? • Can amateurs be trained to carry out assessments and characterisation? • What mechanisms exist to encourage consumers to use variety identifiers, especially in the promotion of regional specialities? • How can genebanks improve their documentation of traditional patterns of use and cultivation? • What mechanisms exist within nationally designated reserves to encourage the conservation and utilisation of a greater diversity of plant genetic resources? • Can the use of regionally adapted varieties be linked to traditional methods of farming? • Can genebanks play a part in mitigating the negative impact of the introduction of genetically uniform crops and varieties? • Can genebanks work with farmers to increase the yields of traditional landraces grown in traditional systems? • What opportunities exist for increasing public awareness of the issues around plant genetic resources through the use of shows and exhibitions, local fields days, open days at genebanks, living museums, historic houses and gardens, botanic gardens, and the like? In the final analysis, the group agreed that, at least within the European Union, the biggest single barrier to enhanced on-farm conservation was legal; existing plant variety legislation makes it almost impossible for the farmer to derive any economic benefit from the conservation of plant genetic resources. A change in this legislation would have a great impact, even if it did not promote an increased diversity of plant genetic resources on the farm, but merely permitted it instead of preventing it. As a first step, the group urges the European Parliament to use whatever mechanisms it can to assess the impact of existing legislation on the conservation and utilisation of plant genetic resources, and to consider additional systems if appropriate.

Report of Working Group on: Complementary contribution of Nature Conservation (i.e. Biosphere Reserves) and Genebanks in conservation of plant genetic resources Rapporteur: F. BEGEMANN The group discussed numerous aspects that influence collaboration between genebanks and institutions engaged in nature conservation. Areas of common interest were identified and participants agreed that conservation in the wider sense would also imply the necessity to monitor diversity at various levels and to utilize plant genetic resources as a means to continuing conservation. The need to improve the cost efficiency of on-going activities lead to a detailed discussion on collaborative research work and opportunities that will evolve from combined communication systems. Participants welcomed the offer made by a representative of the German Committee of the Man and Biosphere Programme (MAB) to use the existing instrument of biosphere reserves for conservation and management of plant genetic resources. The group agreed on a list of concrete activities at a national level to be executed as soon as possible: 1 As a first step, the participants of the symposium will clarify existing instruments in the area of nature conservation that would be useful for conservation and management of plant genetic resources in their respective countries; biosphere reserves or other categories of protected landscape were mentioned. 2 The participants of the symposium will develop a list of ecotypes and areas worthwhile for protection; diversity of wild progenitors and wild relatives of crop plants to be of particular importance. 3 Representatives of the genebanks will draft lists of species to be considered for monitoring systems that already exist in protected areas; in addition, lists of descriptors of different species for the monitoring will be developed. 4 It was agreed to develop a list of crops that a re suitable for on-farm or in-situ conservation in protected areas (i.e. biosphere reserves). 5 It was emphasized that a communication system between genebanks (in a wider sense) and the national MAB-secretariats and other relevant authorities is needed and should be established as soon as possible. Participants obtained addresses of their respective national MAB-secretariats. The lists to be developed (see 2, 3 and 4) will be communicated to the relevant national authorities and the MAB-secretariats in particular. 6 To support European cooperation it was agreed to send the lists (see 2,3 and 4) to the ECP/GR-Coordinator who will forward the lists to the European MAB-secretariat in Poland. 7 The following research needs were mentioned with respect to opportunities arising from the in-situ / ex-situ collaboration: - Evaluation of genetic variance of polymorphisms and molecular variance; - Crop evolution studies; - Species identification; - Identification of marginal populations; - Establishment of core collections; - Comparison of genetic resources under in-situ and ex-situ conservation practices.

Report <strong>of</strong> Working Group on:<br />

Complementary contribution <strong>of</strong> Nature <strong>Conservation</strong> (i.e. Biosphere Reserves)<br />

and Genebanks in conservation <strong>of</strong> plant genetic resources<br />

Rapporteur: F. BEGEMANN<br />

The group discussed numerous aspects that influence collaboration between genebanks and<br />

institutions engaged in nature conservation. Areas <strong>of</strong> common interest were identified and<br />

participants agreed that conservation in the wider sense would also imply the necessity to monitor<br />

diversity at various levels and to utilize plant genetic resources as a means to continuing<br />

conservation.<br />

The need to improve the cost efficiency <strong>of</strong> on-going activities lead to a detailed discussion on<br />

collaborative research work and opportunities that will evolve from combined communication<br />

systems. Participants welcomed the <strong>of</strong>fer made by a representative <strong>of</strong> the German Committee <strong>of</strong><br />

the Man and Biosphere Programme (MAB) to use the existing instrument <strong>of</strong> biosphere reserves<br />

for conservation and management <strong>of</strong> plant genetic resources.<br />

The group agreed on a list <strong>of</strong> concrete activities at a national level to be executed as soon as<br />

possible:<br />

1 As a first step, the participants <strong>of</strong> the symposium will clarify existing instruments in the area<br />

<strong>of</strong> nature conservation that would be useful for conservation and management <strong>of</strong> plant genetic<br />

resources in their respective countries; biosphere reserves or other categories <strong>of</strong> protected<br />

landscape were mentioned.<br />

2 The participants <strong>of</strong> the symposium will develop a list <strong>of</strong> ecotypes and areas worthwhile for<br />

protection; diversity <strong>of</strong> wild progenitors and wild relatives <strong>of</strong> crop plants to be <strong>of</strong> particular<br />

importance.<br />

3 Representatives <strong>of</strong> the genebanks will draft lists <strong>of</strong> species to be considered for monitoring<br />

systems that already exist in protected areas; in addition, lists <strong>of</strong> descriptors <strong>of</strong> different<br />

species for the monitoring will be developed.<br />

4 It was agreed to develop a list <strong>of</strong> crops that a re suitable for on-farm or in-situ conservation<br />

in protected areas (i.e. biosphere reserves).<br />

5 It was emphasized that a communication system between genebanks (in a wider sense) and<br />

the national MAB-secretariats and other relevant authorities is needed and should be<br />

established as soon as possible. Participants obtained addresses <strong>of</strong> their respective national<br />

MAB-secretariats. The lists to be developed (see 2, 3 and 4) will be communicated to the<br />

relevant national authorities and the MAB-secretariats in particular.<br />

6 To support European cooperation it was agreed to send the lists (see 2,3 and 4) to the<br />

ECP/GR-Coordinator who will forward the lists to the European MAB-secretariat in Poland.<br />

7 The following research needs were mentioned with respect to opportunities arising from the<br />

in-situ / ex-situ collaboration:<br />

- Evaluation <strong>of</strong> genetic variance <strong>of</strong> polymorphisms and molecular variance;<br />

- Crop evolution studies;<br />

- Species identification;<br />

- Identification <strong>of</strong> marginal populations;<br />

- Establishment <strong>of</strong> core collections;<br />

- Comparison <strong>of</strong> genetic resources under in-situ and ex-situ conservation practices.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!