29.01.2013 Views

Integration of Conservation Strategies of Plant Genetic ... - Genres

Integration of Conservation Strategies of Plant Genetic ... - Genres

Integration of Conservation Strategies of Plant Genetic ... - Genres

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

- the Genebank keeps, in the first place, such information on plant genetic resources within its<br />

mandate which is necessary for taking this responsibility.<br />

3.2 Species to be considered for in situ conservation<br />

Species endemic and indigenous in the country(ies) and within the mandate <strong>of</strong> the Genebank can be<br />

recommended to be entirely or partly conserved in situ in the following cases:<br />

A. The species comprise cultivated as well as wild growing forms in the area <strong>of</strong> Genebank<br />

responsibility:<br />

I. the species is difficult or expensive to manage;<br />

II. the species is very widely distributed in the area <strong>of</strong> Genebank responsibility;<br />

III. the species is endangered.<br />

B. The species comprise only wild forms in the area <strong>of</strong> Genebank responsibility but is cultivated<br />

somewhere else.<br />

C. The species is nowhere cultivated (wild relative <strong>of</strong> cultivated species).<br />

Arguments for conserving material as presented above in situ are:<br />

A.I. To conserve perennial species such as Prunus, Rosa, etc, as ex situ, in clone archives or<br />

similar, is <strong>of</strong>ten too costly. Accessions <strong>of</strong> seeds from various populations can, however,<br />

be conserved ex situ, in cases where the storage <strong>of</strong> seed fit into the standard used at the<br />

Genebank.<br />

A.II. Many important herbage plants are <strong>of</strong>ten included in this cathegory. Such a conservation<br />

approach may provide a less expensive protection than ex situ, particularly as extensive<br />

collecting and multiplication is a heavy burden. Only for material used for research and plant<br />

breeding programmes, or when an important species is threatened, ex situ conservation should<br />

be considered justifiable.<br />

A. III. The material will become extinct if measures are not taken.<br />

B. By international undertakings, such as the CBD and the FAOs Undertaking for the<br />

conservation <strong>of</strong> genetic resources, the Genebank may be tied to the international network<br />

<strong>of</strong> gene banks. However, collecting, conserving and multiplying even species <strong>of</strong> little or<br />

no interest for the country(ies) for which the Genebank has responsibility may be too<br />

costly to manage. To meet the demand from other parts <strong>of</strong> the network, these species can<br />

be conserved in situ.<br />

C. Wild species (including wild forms <strong>of</strong> cultivated species) with a functional mechanism <strong>of</strong><br />

seed dispersal are in general more complicated to handle ex situ, than cultivated plants.<br />

Therefore in situ conservation, being less costly, can be recommended for wild species.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!