Integration of Conservation Strategies of Plant Genetic ... - Genres
Integration of Conservation Strategies of Plant Genetic ... - Genres Integration of Conservation Strategies of Plant Genetic ... - Genres
Conservation methods and potential utilization of plant genetic resources in nature conservation S. BLIXT 1 1. Introduction With the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), issued June 5, 1992, conservation in situ of genetic resources, i.e. the genetic diversity of cultivated plants, has again become an open question and a matter for discussion since the CBD and the previously followed FAO Undertaking on genetic resources differ in several places. However, the discussion of the matter is clouded by several ambiguities, many of them concerned with definition of terms, some of them going back to the fact that the CBD, for different reasons, is in itself a vague document. In the Nordic countries there is a well established infrastructure for conservation of natural resources in general, based on multi-institutional arrangements of various categories of nature reserves as well as a non-governmental volontary sector (NGOs). To avoid duplication of work and therby to minimize costs, NGB prefers collaboration with those institutions to meet its requirements for in situ conservation rather than going into reserve establishment on its own. The Nordic Gene Bank (NGB) has been commissioned to conserve valuable plant genetic resources (PGR) of agricultural and horticultural plants which are indigenous to the Nordic region, wild forms and wild relatives included. NGB has up to now worked in accordance with FAOs Undertaking of 1983, but with the changes introduced by the CBD, particularly the implied widening of the in situ concept, it is probably time to review and reappraise the underlying scientific principles. 2. Background According to the NGB definition, plant genetic resources comprise material of actual and potential value for Nordic plant breeding and plant research programmes. The CBD defines genetic resources thus: "Genetic resources means genetic material of actual or potential value." This is well in accordance with NGB use, keeping in mind though that NGB has a restricted mandate and limited resources. First priority is given to species indigenous to the Nordic countries and presently cultivated, and second to indigenous species previously grown and therefore possibly of interest also in the future. A third group comprises indigenous plant species not presently cultivated in the Nordic countries, but cultivated in other areas of the world. Some overlapping between the second and the third priority exist. In addition to indigenous Nordic species, there are plant species, which were introduced in the Nordic countries, some of them several thousands of years ago. These include species such as barley, wheat, rape etc. Some of those species of the so called exogenous gene pool are economically extremely important, and therefore share the first priority. 1 Author's address: Nordic Gene Bank P.O. Box 41 23053 Alnarp Sweden
The definition in CBD which reflects on origin reads: "Country of origin of genetic resources means the country which possesses those genetic resources in in-situ conditions." In situ preservation is defined in different ways. NGB has since the beginning of the 1980s worked with three categories of conservation, ex situ, inter situ and in situ. Inter situ has come closest to what is today generally meant by on-farm-conservation. With in situ conservation has been meant the conservation without radical and regular interference by man, i.e. activities such as planting and harvesting. Consequently, planted clonal archives are not included while meadows are. Virgin land is included as well as natural land for pasture husbandry. The definition of the CBD is: "In-situ conservation means the conservation of ecosystems and natural habitats and the maintenance and recovery of viable populations of species in their natural surroundings and, in the case of domesticated or cultivated species, in the surroundings where they have developed their distinctive properties." 3. In situ and ex situ conservation 3.1 Control of genetic resources We may then discuss what should be the objectives of in situ conservation in relation to genetic resources in particular, i.e. cultivated plants and their wild relatives. For several reasons, genebanks established in the past are generally not equipped nor funded to deal with in situ conservation according to CBD, particularly when considering Article 8 of the convention, expressing the content of in situ conservation, or Article Article 15, concerning access to genetic resources. Particularly with respect to Article 15, the following overall objective may be discussed: For the genebank to have full control of the plant genetic resources within their area for its mandate species. This may be achieved as follows: - All territorial activities, such as forming natural reserves, or obtaining information on plant taxa and other information on the species level, should be performed by governmental or nongovernmental organisations for natural resources conservation and sustainable utilization active in the area. - the Genebank for PGR to contribute mainly with the specific competence within its mandate; - the Genebank to represent the country/region in recommending measures for considering PGR in forming natural reserves in agricultural districts; - the Genebank to have, through due permission from authorities in the country(ies), superintendence of license for collecting plant genetic resources in areas under tutelary laws; - the Genebank to be able to give information and guidelines to users/collectors of plant genetic resources in areas in the country/region, according to A-C below, of interest for collection i.e. where wanted material occurs or is expected to occur; - the Genebank does not, as a rule, keep in its ex situ collection those materials which are conserved in situ; - the Genebank to gradually be able to give information about diversity within the species; - the Genebank to contribute - within its mandate to preserve plant genetic resources - to the utilisation of of the PGR in a way adeqate for sustainable farming as part of sustainable development;
- Page 123 and 124: 7. Concluding remark Due to the lon
- Page 125 and 126: Plants and Gardens in the UK. These
- Page 127 and 128: to be unavailable elsewhere. The cl
- Page 129 and 130: 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Potato
- Page 131 and 132: is no duplication. Disputes would b
- Page 133 and 134: 1ai In the event of germination dro
- Page 135 and 136: Finally, all these methods of conse
- Page 137 and 138: have historically been one of the f
- Page 139 and 140: In situ conservation of plant genet
- Page 141 and 142: eing mainly to local and regional u
- Page 143 and 144: working with local people on conser
- Page 145 and 146: Ex situ and on farm conservation an
- Page 147 and 148: Germany the Gatersleben institute w
- Page 149 and 150: Ex sit u an d on f ar m con ser v a
- Page 151 and 152: Ex sit u an d on f ar m con ser v a
- Page 153 and 154: Ex sit u an d on f ar m con ser v a
- Page 155 and 156: On farm conservation of fruit trees
- Page 157 and 158: Little ancient villages, abandoned
- Page 159 and 160: consisting of two plants for each v
- Page 161 and 162: and fruit conservation. Local and r
- Page 163 and 164: Integrated approaches to ex-situ an
- Page 165 and 166: of direct importance to the institu
- Page 167 and 168: of fruit trees still found in garde
- Page 169 and 170: All participants signed three resol
- Page 171 and 172: Ex situ: - plantations - seed orcha
- Page 173: Pollen storage is an efficient meth
- Page 177 and 178: 3.3 Variability within the species
- Page 179 and 180: New Approaches to Evaluation of Gen
- Page 181 and 182: References Dragavtsev, V.A., Utemis
- Page 183 and 184: The tasks of vegetables genetic res
- Page 185 and 186: Atriplex hortensis 1 Brassica campe
- Page 187 and 188: 5. The collection some of Brassica
- Page 189 and 190: The present economic situation in P
- Page 191 and 192: enormous variety of forms, the evol
- Page 193 and 194: For several years now the Botanical
- Page 195 and 196: References: CELINSKI F., DENISIUK F
- Page 197 and 198: Winter buds were used and analyzed
- Page 199 and 200: Report of Working Groups: J. CHERFA
- Page 201 and 202: Report of Working Group on: Complem
- Page 203 and 204: Resolution (formulated by all parti
- Page 205 and 206: Germany Dr. Karl HAMMER Head of Gen
- Page 207 and 208: Tel:+(48)-22-552575 Fax:+(48)-22-55
- Page 209 and 210: 06118 Halle Dr. Lothar FRESE German
<strong>Conservation</strong> methods and potential utilization <strong>of</strong> plant genetic resources in nature conservation<br />
S. BLIXT 1<br />
1. Introduction<br />
With the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), issued June 5, 1992, conservation in situ <strong>of</strong> genetic<br />
resources, i.e. the genetic diversity <strong>of</strong> cultivated plants, has again become an open question and a matter<br />
for discussion since the CBD and the previously followed FAO Undertaking on genetic resources differ<br />
in several places. However, the discussion <strong>of</strong> the matter is clouded by several ambiguities, many <strong>of</strong> them<br />
concerned with definition <strong>of</strong> terms, some <strong>of</strong> them going back to the fact that the CBD, for different<br />
reasons, is in itself a vague document.<br />
In the Nordic countries there is a well established infrastructure for conservation <strong>of</strong> natural resources<br />
in general, based on multi-institutional arrangements <strong>of</strong> various categories <strong>of</strong> nature reserves as well as<br />
a non-governmental volontary sector (NGOs). To avoid duplication <strong>of</strong> work and therby to minimize<br />
costs, NGB prefers collaboration with those institutions to meet its requirements for in situ conservation<br />
rather than going into reserve establishment on its own.<br />
The Nordic Gene Bank (NGB) has been commissioned to conserve valuable plant genetic resources<br />
(PGR) <strong>of</strong> agricultural and horticultural plants which are indigenous to the Nordic region, wild forms and<br />
wild relatives included. NGB has up to now worked in accordance with FAOs Undertaking <strong>of</strong> 1983, but<br />
with the changes introduced by the CBD, particularly the implied widening <strong>of</strong> the in situ concept, it is<br />
probably time to review and reappraise the underlying scientific principles.<br />
2. Background<br />
According to the NGB definition, plant genetic resources comprise material <strong>of</strong> actual and potential value<br />
for Nordic plant breeding and plant research programmes. The CBD defines genetic resources thus:<br />
"<strong>Genetic</strong> resources means genetic material <strong>of</strong> actual or potential value." This is well in accordance with<br />
NGB use, keeping in mind though that NGB has a restricted mandate and limited resources.<br />
First priority is given to species indigenous to the Nordic countries and presently cultivated, and second<br />
to indigenous species previously grown and therefore possibly <strong>of</strong> interest also in the future. A third<br />
group comprises indigenous plant species not presently cultivated in the Nordic countries, but cultivated<br />
in other areas <strong>of</strong> the world. Some overlapping between the second and the third priority exist.<br />
In addition to indigenous Nordic species, there are plant species, which were introduced in the Nordic<br />
countries, some <strong>of</strong> them several thousands <strong>of</strong> years ago. These include species such as barley, wheat,<br />
rape etc. Some <strong>of</strong> those species <strong>of</strong> the so called exogenous gene pool are economically extremely<br />
important, and therefore share the first priority.<br />
1<br />
Author's address:<br />
Nordic Gene Bank<br />
P.O. Box 41<br />
23053 Alnarp<br />
Sweden