29.01.2013 Views

Integration of Conservation Strategies of Plant Genetic ... - Genres

Integration of Conservation Strategies of Plant Genetic ... - Genres

Integration of Conservation Strategies of Plant Genetic ... - Genres

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

working with local people on conservation issues. In the past, ethnobotany has too <strong>of</strong>ten meant<br />

compilation <strong>of</strong> lists <strong>of</strong> species used by different ethnic groups, especially as medicines. Such preservation<br />

<strong>of</strong> cultural knowledge has its values, but, in itself, it serves no conservation purpose. In recognition <strong>of</strong><br />

the urgent need to augment the capacity in many countries to work with local people for conservation,<br />

WWF, UNESCO and the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew have launched a 4 year programme "People and<br />

<strong>Plant</strong>s". The approach is to develop a number <strong>of</strong> model projects (in Malaysia, Madagascar, Tanzania,<br />

Uganda, Mexico, Brazil and Bolivia), to provide technical manuals in ethnobotany and related subjects,<br />

and to hold training workshops.<br />

There is considerable commercial interest in the development <strong>of</strong> new natural products, such as pesticides<br />

and pharmaceuticals. Over 200 firms worldwide are said to be interested in exploring the plant world<br />

in the search for new drugs, sometimes using local knowledge about plants as a guide. Geographically,<br />

most research and related commerce is based in the richer "northern" countries, while many <strong>of</strong> the plants<br />

and other organisms under inspection come from the biologically rich countries <strong>of</strong> the tropics. The<br />

Convention <strong>of</strong> Biological Diversity recognizes that this type <strong>of</strong> exploitation <strong>of</strong> biodiversity must be<br />

undertaken in ways which benefit conservation <strong>of</strong> biodiversity, recognizing also that a priority in many<br />

source countries is alleviation <strong>of</strong> poverty. There is a need for equitable partnerships, in which a fair share<br />

<strong>of</strong> the benefits accrue to the countries and local areas which are the sources <strong>of</strong> the plant samples. The<br />

benefits should be used in ways which increase the motivation at these levels to conserve biodiversity<br />

and which increase the capacity to do so. WWF has prepared a working paper outlining the issues and<br />

with guidelines as to how fair deals may be struck (Cunningham 1993c).<br />

Similar arguments hold in the case <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong> germplasm for crop breeding. The main areas <strong>of</strong> debate<br />

relate to local knowledge, farmers' rights and equity in the distribution and control <strong>of</strong> genetic resources<br />

from crop plants (Mooney 1983). The issue was partially resolved when the Commission on <strong>Plant</strong><br />

<strong>Genetic</strong> Resources revised the FAO Undertaking for <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Genetic</strong> Resources to recognize both plantbreeders'<br />

and farmers' rights (WRI 1992).<br />

Benefit sharing and intellectual property rights<br />

As indicated earlier, benefit sharing to ensure that local communities benefit from conservation and<br />

sustainable use is a priority in achievement <strong>of</strong> biodiversity conservation. This is recognised in the<br />

Convention on Biological Diversity. Examination <strong>of</strong> incentives (and counter-incentives - for example,<br />

some <strong>of</strong> the structural issues associated with reform <strong>of</strong> the EC's CAP) for conservation and sustainable<br />

use is also crucial.<br />

In this context, it is WWF's view that current trends towards extending intellectual property rights (IPRs)<br />

regimes could exacerbate the loss <strong>of</strong> biodiversity. The patenting <strong>of</strong> novel biotechnologies for agriculture<br />

will accelerate the trend towards monocultures and the narrowing <strong>of</strong> the genetic base <strong>of</strong> resources used<br />

for agriculture, because, in conjunction with other policy settings (eg. bank lending policies, government<br />

subsidies, extension services, and corporate marketing strategies), it will increase the pressures on<br />

farmers to use patented seeds and animals and so further undermine the biological diversity associated<br />

with traditional and low input farming systems.<br />

Furthermore, current IPR regimes do not recognise and reward the knowledge and innovations <strong>of</strong> local<br />

communities, especially indigenous peoples, in conserving, breeding and experimenting on the diversity<br />

<strong>of</strong> cultivated and wild organisms - for instance, those with medicinal or agricultural values - despite the<br />

fact that these very characteristics <strong>of</strong>ten form the basis <strong>of</strong> the IPRs issued to others. In consequence,<br />

such IPR regimes undermine the benefit sharing provisions, recognised as crucial to the conservation<br />

and sustainable use <strong>of</strong> biodiversity, <strong>of</strong> the Convention on Biological Diversity.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!