Integration of Conservation Strategies of Plant Genetic ... - Genres
Integration of Conservation Strategies of Plant Genetic ... - Genres
Integration of Conservation Strategies of Plant Genetic ... - Genres
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
on the owner; a decision to convert a mountain forest to cropland, <strong>of</strong> benefit to land hungry local people,<br />
should be considered with reference to possible adverse effects on people downstream, such as loss <strong>of</strong><br />
a secure water supply.<br />
Under the Convention on Biological Diversity, prime requirements for states are to investigate patterns<br />
<strong>of</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> biological diversity, identify key sites <strong>of</strong> particular biological value, legislate for the<br />
protection <strong>of</strong> such sites and install effective systems <strong>of</strong> management. It is essential for states to be aware<br />
<strong>of</strong> the global significance <strong>of</strong> their national biodiversity and in this context the International Council for<br />
Bird Preservation (1992) has produced a list <strong>of</strong> key sites for conservation <strong>of</strong> bird diversity worldwide,<br />
while WWF and IUCN will soon produce a guide to about 250 <strong>of</strong> the most significant global plant sites,<br />
drawing on expertise from all over the world (Davis, Heywood & MacBride in prep.). There are a<br />
number <strong>of</strong> techniques <strong>of</strong> floristic and vegetation survey which can be used to help identify patterns <strong>of</strong><br />
plant distribution and important plant sites, relevant to different geographical scales, and WWF is<br />
currently preparing a practical manual for the use <strong>of</strong> field workers.<br />
How can management <strong>of</strong> protected areas be made effective?<br />
A protected area, which may variously be designated as a national park, forest reserve, nature reserve<br />
or a number <strong>of</strong> other categories, implies that restrictions are placed on certain human activities. In the<br />
case <strong>of</strong> some national parks, this has sometimes been interpreted as meaning exclusion <strong>of</strong> traditional<br />
activities and consequently local communities have <strong>of</strong>ten left alienated. Relatively recent recognition<br />
that conservation cannot normally be successful in a social vacuum, excluding local communities, has<br />
led to the development <strong>of</strong> the "conservation and development" and "core area and buffer zone"<br />
approaches, which seek to achieve conservation <strong>of</strong> biodiversity through meeting some <strong>of</strong> the aspirations<br />
<strong>of</strong> local people.<br />
<strong>Plant</strong> diversity will only be conserved in protected areas if people wish to do so. Poor rural people in<br />
many countries rely heavily on plant resources harvested from the wild, for fuel, building and craft<br />
materials, medicines, ropes and many other purposes. What sense is there in denying use by these people<br />
<strong>of</strong> the plant resources on which they depend, while allowing access to the same plant resources to<br />
scientists, plant breeders and industrialists interested in developing new types <strong>of</strong> cultivated plants,<br />
pharmaceutical drugs or other products <strong>of</strong> commercial value? What is the justification for allowing<br />
access to rich tourists to view wildlife and scenery, if the people who traditionally use the land are kept<br />
away or do not receive any other benefits from tourist activity? In general, what are the incentives to<br />
local people and communities to conserve biodiversity, if they do not receive any <strong>of</strong> the benefits from<br />
its continued existence and sustainable use?<br />
The inclusion <strong>of</strong> local people in the conservation equation entails an analysis <strong>of</strong> the links between people<br />
and nature, identification <strong>of</strong> positive links (which can then be reinforced) and identification <strong>of</strong> negative<br />
impacts (for which solutions can then be sought). This work should be done as a collaborative venture<br />
between local communities and ethnobotanists or other plant resource experts, recognizing the need for<br />
the full participation <strong>of</strong> local communities if proposed solutions are to be effective, as well as<br />
acknowledging that some specialists within the local communities are likely to be more knowledgeable<br />
about many local plant resources than any outside scientist. Weaknesses in the links between local<br />
people and biodiversity include cases where harvesting is endangering the conservation <strong>of</strong> biodiversity,<br />
cases where rates <strong>of</strong> harvesting are greater than the growth rates <strong>of</strong> species and cases where there is a<br />
loss <strong>of</strong> local knowledge about the natural world, severing links between cultures and nature, with the<br />
danger that nature will no longer be valued locally, removing a motive for its continuing existence.<br />
There is a shortage <strong>of</strong> trained ethnobotanists and plant resource experts in many countries capable <strong>of</strong>