29.01.2013 Views

Integration of Conservation Strategies of Plant Genetic ... - Genres

Integration of Conservation Strategies of Plant Genetic ... - Genres

Integration of Conservation Strategies of Plant Genetic ... - Genres

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

on the owner; a decision to convert a mountain forest to cropland, <strong>of</strong> benefit to land hungry local people,<br />

should be considered with reference to possible adverse effects on people downstream, such as loss <strong>of</strong><br />

a secure water supply.<br />

Under the Convention on Biological Diversity, prime requirements for states are to investigate patterns<br />

<strong>of</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> biological diversity, identify key sites <strong>of</strong> particular biological value, legislate for the<br />

protection <strong>of</strong> such sites and install effective systems <strong>of</strong> management. It is essential for states to be aware<br />

<strong>of</strong> the global significance <strong>of</strong> their national biodiversity and in this context the International Council for<br />

Bird Preservation (1992) has produced a list <strong>of</strong> key sites for conservation <strong>of</strong> bird diversity worldwide,<br />

while WWF and IUCN will soon produce a guide to about 250 <strong>of</strong> the most significant global plant sites,<br />

drawing on expertise from all over the world (Davis, Heywood & MacBride in prep.). There are a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> techniques <strong>of</strong> floristic and vegetation survey which can be used to help identify patterns <strong>of</strong><br />

plant distribution and important plant sites, relevant to different geographical scales, and WWF is<br />

currently preparing a practical manual for the use <strong>of</strong> field workers.<br />

How can management <strong>of</strong> protected areas be made effective?<br />

A protected area, which may variously be designated as a national park, forest reserve, nature reserve<br />

or a number <strong>of</strong> other categories, implies that restrictions are placed on certain human activities. In the<br />

case <strong>of</strong> some national parks, this has sometimes been interpreted as meaning exclusion <strong>of</strong> traditional<br />

activities and consequently local communities have <strong>of</strong>ten left alienated. Relatively recent recognition<br />

that conservation cannot normally be successful in a social vacuum, excluding local communities, has<br />

led to the development <strong>of</strong> the "conservation and development" and "core area and buffer zone"<br />

approaches, which seek to achieve conservation <strong>of</strong> biodiversity through meeting some <strong>of</strong> the aspirations<br />

<strong>of</strong> local people.<br />

<strong>Plant</strong> diversity will only be conserved in protected areas if people wish to do so. Poor rural people in<br />

many countries rely heavily on plant resources harvested from the wild, for fuel, building and craft<br />

materials, medicines, ropes and many other purposes. What sense is there in denying use by these people<br />

<strong>of</strong> the plant resources on which they depend, while allowing access to the same plant resources to<br />

scientists, plant breeders and industrialists interested in developing new types <strong>of</strong> cultivated plants,<br />

pharmaceutical drugs or other products <strong>of</strong> commercial value? What is the justification for allowing<br />

access to rich tourists to view wildlife and scenery, if the people who traditionally use the land are kept<br />

away or do not receive any other benefits from tourist activity? In general, what are the incentives to<br />

local people and communities to conserve biodiversity, if they do not receive any <strong>of</strong> the benefits from<br />

its continued existence and sustainable use?<br />

The inclusion <strong>of</strong> local people in the conservation equation entails an analysis <strong>of</strong> the links between people<br />

and nature, identification <strong>of</strong> positive links (which can then be reinforced) and identification <strong>of</strong> negative<br />

impacts (for which solutions can then be sought). This work should be done as a collaborative venture<br />

between local communities and ethnobotanists or other plant resource experts, recognizing the need for<br />

the full participation <strong>of</strong> local communities if proposed solutions are to be effective, as well as<br />

acknowledging that some specialists within the local communities are likely to be more knowledgeable<br />

about many local plant resources than any outside scientist. Weaknesses in the links between local<br />

people and biodiversity include cases where harvesting is endangering the conservation <strong>of</strong> biodiversity,<br />

cases where rates <strong>of</strong> harvesting are greater than the growth rates <strong>of</strong> species and cases where there is a<br />

loss <strong>of</strong> local knowledge about the natural world, severing links between cultures and nature, with the<br />

danger that nature will no longer be valued locally, removing a motive for its continuing existence.<br />

There is a shortage <strong>of</strong> trained ethnobotanists and plant resource experts in many countries capable <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!