Integration of Conservation Strategies of Plant Genetic ... - Genres
Integration of Conservation Strategies of Plant Genetic ... - Genres
Integration of Conservation Strategies of Plant Genetic ... - Genres
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
In situ conservation <strong>of</strong> plant genetic resources: the view <strong>of</strong> WWF<br />
R. TAPPER, A. HAMILTON 1<br />
The Convention on Biological Diversity<br />
The Convention on Biological Diversity was signed by over 154 states in Rio de Janeiro in June 1992<br />
and will come into force on 29 December 1993. The Convention places an obligation on those states<br />
which have ratified it to conserve biological diversity. <strong>Plant</strong> genetic resources are a part <strong>of</strong> this<br />
biological diversity and can be defined as consisting <strong>of</strong> that part <strong>of</strong> the plant world which is <strong>of</strong> actual or<br />
potential value to people. There are many existing uses <strong>of</strong> plants (for example, over 35,000 plant<br />
species, about a tenth <strong>of</strong> the total, have been used medicinally) and new uses are continually being<br />
discovered. It is thus wise to define the whole <strong>of</strong> plant diversity as a genetic resource.<br />
<strong>Plant</strong>s are living things and conservation <strong>of</strong> plant diversity necessitates the continuing existence <strong>of</strong> those<br />
ecosystems <strong>of</strong> which plants form a part. Today, virtually all ecosystems have been, and continue to be,<br />
modified by people, who therefore must be considered integral ecosystem components. Furthermore,<br />
plant populations are not, and never have been, static entities; they have always been subject to<br />
evolutionary forces. <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>of</strong> plant diversity does not imply that people should not cause<br />
alterations to ecosystems nor that plant diversity should remain unchanged, but rather that human<br />
interventions are <strong>of</strong> such a nature that a balance is struck between meeting human needs and<br />
safeguarding those irreplaceable genetic resources which are essential to meet these needs, both now and<br />
in the future.<br />
The Convention on Biodiversity emphasises the importance <strong>of</strong> in situ, as contrasted with ex situ,<br />
conservation. This is not to deny that ex situ preservation is not sometimes very important. The<br />
collection and maintenance <strong>of</strong> samples <strong>of</strong> plant germplasm in living collections, seed banks and other<br />
types <strong>of</strong> storage is clearly very useful for the rescue <strong>of</strong> genetic materials in cases where plant genetic<br />
diversity is being lost, whether this be in natural ecosystems or through the loss <strong>of</strong> traditional agricultural<br />
or forestry practices.<br />
However, ex situ preservation cannot replace the role <strong>of</strong> intact ecosystems in the maintenance <strong>of</strong> genetic<br />
diversity. Conceptually, ex situ preservation should be viewed as a temporary measure, necessary at a<br />
time <strong>of</strong> crisis. If conservation is intended, then ex situ preservation must sooner or later be linked with<br />
re-introductions into natural and appropriate agricultural or forestry ecosystems, so that genetic diversity<br />
forms, as in the long run it must, part <strong>of</strong> actively functioning and continually evolving ecosystems.<br />
1<br />
Authors' address:<br />
WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature)<br />
Panda House<br />
Weyside Park,<br />
Godalming<br />
Surrey GU7 1XR<br />
United Kingdom