29.01.2013 Views

Integration of Conservation Strategies of Plant Genetic ... - Genres

Integration of Conservation Strategies of Plant Genetic ... - Genres

Integration of Conservation Strategies of Plant Genetic ... - Genres

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In situ conservation <strong>of</strong> plant genetic resources: the view <strong>of</strong> WWF<br />

R. TAPPER, A. HAMILTON 1<br />

The Convention on Biological Diversity<br />

The Convention on Biological Diversity was signed by over 154 states in Rio de Janeiro in June 1992<br />

and will come into force on 29 December 1993. The Convention places an obligation on those states<br />

which have ratified it to conserve biological diversity. <strong>Plant</strong> genetic resources are a part <strong>of</strong> this<br />

biological diversity and can be defined as consisting <strong>of</strong> that part <strong>of</strong> the plant world which is <strong>of</strong> actual or<br />

potential value to people. There are many existing uses <strong>of</strong> plants (for example, over 35,000 plant<br />

species, about a tenth <strong>of</strong> the total, have been used medicinally) and new uses are continually being<br />

discovered. It is thus wise to define the whole <strong>of</strong> plant diversity as a genetic resource.<br />

<strong>Plant</strong>s are living things and conservation <strong>of</strong> plant diversity necessitates the continuing existence <strong>of</strong> those<br />

ecosystems <strong>of</strong> which plants form a part. Today, virtually all ecosystems have been, and continue to be,<br />

modified by people, who therefore must be considered integral ecosystem components. Furthermore,<br />

plant populations are not, and never have been, static entities; they have always been subject to<br />

evolutionary forces. <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>of</strong> plant diversity does not imply that people should not cause<br />

alterations to ecosystems nor that plant diversity should remain unchanged, but rather that human<br />

interventions are <strong>of</strong> such a nature that a balance is struck between meeting human needs and<br />

safeguarding those irreplaceable genetic resources which are essential to meet these needs, both now and<br />

in the future.<br />

The Convention on Biodiversity emphasises the importance <strong>of</strong> in situ, as contrasted with ex situ,<br />

conservation. This is not to deny that ex situ preservation is not sometimes very important. The<br />

collection and maintenance <strong>of</strong> samples <strong>of</strong> plant germplasm in living collections, seed banks and other<br />

types <strong>of</strong> storage is clearly very useful for the rescue <strong>of</strong> genetic materials in cases where plant genetic<br />

diversity is being lost, whether this be in natural ecosystems or through the loss <strong>of</strong> traditional agricultural<br />

or forestry practices.<br />

However, ex situ preservation cannot replace the role <strong>of</strong> intact ecosystems in the maintenance <strong>of</strong> genetic<br />

diversity. Conceptually, ex situ preservation should be viewed as a temporary measure, necessary at a<br />

time <strong>of</strong> crisis. If conservation is intended, then ex situ preservation must sooner or later be linked with<br />

re-introductions into natural and appropriate agricultural or forestry ecosystems, so that genetic diversity<br />

forms, as in the long run it must, part <strong>of</strong> actively functioning and continually evolving ecosystems.<br />

1<br />

Authors' address:<br />

WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature)<br />

Panda House<br />

Weyside Park,<br />

Godalming<br />

Surrey GU7 1XR<br />

United Kingdom

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!