Integration of Conservation Strategies of Plant Genetic ... - Genres
Integration of Conservation Strategies of Plant Genetic ... - Genres
Integration of Conservation Strategies of Plant Genetic ... - Genres
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1ai In the event <strong>of</strong> germination dropping below some pre-arranged level (not necessarily the<br />
same level as for marketed seed) the designated body would inform the supplier, who<br />
would be required to deposit a fresh set <strong>of</strong> samples in order to continue marketing the<br />
variety.<br />
9 Seed purity would still have to conform to existing standards.<br />
10 Germination standards could be lowered slightly, although there is no compelling reason<br />
why gardeners should have to suffer lower quality seeds.<br />
11 Disputes would be pursued through local Trading Standards Officers. Questions <strong>of</strong> seed<br />
purity and germination are relatively easily resolved. Questions <strong>of</strong> varietal identity would<br />
pose greater problems, and might require recourse to the stored samples on deposit.<br />
12 Disputes could take two forms; that the variety is not what it claims to be; and, two<br />
varieties being marketed under different names are, in fact, identical in all salient<br />
particulars.<br />
13 These disputes would be resolved by the designated body growing out a portion <strong>of</strong> the<br />
seed deposited with it. The designated body would assess the varieties under question and<br />
report on their identity or otherwise.<br />
14 Penalties would need to be established in advance. Marketing seed that is not true to<br />
name surely ought to attract a relatively stringent fine. Marketing a variety that is<br />
essentially identical to another deposited variety is a greater <strong>of</strong>fence and would call for a<br />
fine and some sort <strong>of</strong> restitution to the prior registrant.<br />
15 Costs, in the absence <strong>of</strong> disputes, would be minimal.<br />
151 Preparation and deposit <strong>of</strong> the samples would fall on the supplier and be part <strong>of</strong> the cost<br />
<strong>of</strong> doing business, just as the cost <strong>of</strong> depositing a copy <strong>of</strong> a book with the Copyright<br />
Libraries falls on a publisher.<br />
152 Preserving deposited samples and routine germination testing would be relatively<br />
inexpensive. They could be funded directly through MAFF (or the EU), recognising the<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> this work to the maintenance <strong>of</strong> biodiversity. Other schemes might include<br />
a percentage levy on the turnover <strong>of</strong> all seed suppliers, not just those that use this scheme.<br />
153 In the event <strong>of</strong> a dispute, if both parties agree that there is a need for arbitration, then each<br />
should deposit with the designated body the entire estimated cost <strong>of</strong> conducting the tests.<br />
After judgement, the winner's costs would be paid by the loser.<br />
16 In conclusion, this scheme <strong>of</strong>fers several advantages over any others I have seen.<br />
161 It maintains a high level <strong>of</strong> consumer protection, and should discourage sharp practice.<br />
162 It is easy to administer.<br />
163 It is inexpensive.<br />
17 I would welcome comments on these proposals.