METAMORPHOSIS: Building the Dome of a Home

METAMORPHOSIS: Building the Dome of a Home METAMORPHOSIS: Building the Dome of a Home

domeofahome.com
from domeofahome.com More from this publisher
28.01.2013 Views

As I edit this book, I find there is even more information to include. Last week, March 1, 2007, a tornado destroyed a school complex in Enterprise, Alabama. Lives were unnecessarily lost. Mark and I traveled to Enterprise the day after and spoke with some students who explained that many people flocked to the new gymnasium because it was built to be stronger than the older gym. After the storm abated, it became evident the old gym was the better survivor. The churches located directly next to the school also suffered severe damage. The destruction left me in shocked despair. A dome gymnasium and churches would have provided safe shelter not only for those at the school, but for the surrounding neighborhood residents as well. With community dome safe shelters, there would be no question where to run to when a severe weather alert is issued. Tragedy that can be averted is the worst kind of tragedy. Hurricane Katrina caught the attention of the entire nation with its surreal drama. At times I almost believed I was watching a B-movie on the Sci-Fi Channel, but then the human element would pierce the numbing hurricane statistics. Numbing because I could not absorb what I was hearing - could not believe the stark reality of the disaster. I am relieved to see that the news media is still covering these tragedies six months later. Lately, I have seen several programs discussing better building techniques using better building materials. This is encouraging and exactly the point Mark and the NBC news crew were trying to make when they stayed in the Dome of a Home for Hurricane Ivan. The lessons from the past two hurricane seasons do not need to be so easily forgotten, so easily dismissed. This is a story that has far reaching implications economically, socially, politically, etc. While I am on my soapbox, I would like to encourage our legislatures to reign in the insanity of the insurance debacle that is bankrupting businesses and creating homeless families. The wind insurance argues that it was flood damage; the flood insurance company insists it was wind damage. And while they argue, the client lives in limbo or worse. Months go by, no money to make repairs so that you can move back home. In short, this is what happens: � Storm hits, your home is damaged, find a place to live temporarily. � File an insurance claim so that you can make repairs and move back home. � Wind insurance denies claim, flood damage blamed. � Flood denies claim, says to contact wind insurance company. � Home deteriorates even further. � More and more extensive repairswill be needed because it has been so long since the storm and you have no money for repairs. � Bank accounts dwindle as you pay your mortgage on a damaged home, your rent on the temporary space, and (love this one) the next year's premiums for your wind and flood insurance. I want to scream at them, "Just take my premiums out of the claim you owe me. I can't pay the premiums until you pay my claim." � Still waiting on insurance claims to be paid, and the new hurricane season is here. 53

This is ridiculous!!! We buy insurance as a safeguard. Supposedly, the insurance companies work for us. Yeah, right. They have become like enemies. Our premiums are due on time or we are dropped. Why don't the insurance companies have a designated time to pay or else be required to pay exorbitant interest on the money they are withholding? After all, I am paying a high interest rate on the money I have to borrow just to survive until the insurance companies pay the claim. If they pay the claim…. And now, it is up to us to prove how and what affected our homes in a storm. Okay…. so we stay and film the storm as proof or …. Or what? What exactly are our alternatives? This is beyond belief: you have to prove whether it was wind or flood that took your house. It's no longer the insurance companies' responsibility to determine this. So, the policyholder will have to have a film or hire an engineer??? We need one insurance policy that covers our home. Period. This would eliminate the opposing companies pointing the finger continuously at the other. This bickering makes money for the insurance companies as our claims set in their accounts drawing interest. But, it bankrupts families and businesses. Even if it is legal, it is morally wrong. Give us one company to deal with. We are under enough stress without having to fight for what is owed to us. Hell, with the stress this inflicts, they should be paying psychiatric care, too. We paid the premiums, insurance companies should pay the claims in an expedient time frame. And before you write about your tax dollars covering our damages, please realize that this is not the case. It is a closed system ---only those who pay in are eligible to file claims. No one pays in that isn't a policyholder. One-third of all people and businesses in the United States are located in a flood zone. An average of 1000 people a day move to the United State's coasts. We need viable building plans and community leadership as the population continues to expand into the danger zones.. With each hurricane strike, the hurricane season seems longer and longer. Each time we spend those six months repairing from the previous six months, the "off-season" seems shorter and shorter. Inevitably, the off-season is filled with TV programs and magazine articles about hurricanes past and what the future may hold. Sometimes, I watch them with morbid fascination, other times it's too painful and I have to change the channel. Evacuation and hurricane preparation are far different now for the residents in my area than when I moved here 11 years ago. Gone is the complacency or illusion that it can't really be all that bad. For days before the storm makes landfall, gasoline is difficult to find and water is a premium commodity. Before Ivan, people prepared, but it was a more relaxed atmosphere. Now, it feels like everyone assumes that any hurricane will be another Ivan. I know I do. Much more trepidation is attached to the tropical storm season for me now than before 2004's Hurricane Ivan. The post traumatic stress was evident on the faces of Ivan's survivors as we prepared for Hurricanes Dennis and Katrina less than a year later. Overwhelming despair and resignation resonated from the people I passed. Blank stares or streaming tears met my somber gaze. The outcome could be different, better or worse, on a large scale or on a very local level. The decisions made today decide which outcome prevails. If you are rebuilding, is it another "temporary structure" that will need rebuilding after another hurricane? Or will you utilize stronger, better building techniques? Domes aren't the only answer. There are elements we used in building the Dome of a Home that can be incorporated into conventional structures. The foam we used can be used to increase a conventional structure's roof line and walls. When used as insulation between the walls, other benefits include its inability to absorb water and promote the growth of mold and mildew and its superior energy efficiency. We are watching a superb structure being built on Pensacola Beach by the Elks Lodge. It is all concrete – even the walls! They are being put together like a 3-D puzzle. 54

This is ridiculous!!! We buy insurance as a safeguard. Supposedly, <strong>the</strong> insurance companies<br />

work for us. Yeah, right. They have become like enemies. Our premiums are due on time or we<br />

are dropped. Why don't <strong>the</strong> insurance companies have a designated time to pay or else be<br />

required to pay exorbitant interest on <strong>the</strong> money <strong>the</strong>y are withholding? After all, I am paying a<br />

high interest rate on <strong>the</strong> money I have to borrow just to survive until <strong>the</strong> insurance companies pay<br />

<strong>the</strong> claim. If <strong>the</strong>y pay <strong>the</strong> claim….<br />

And now, it is up to us to prove how and what affected our homes in a storm. Okay…. so we stay<br />

and film <strong>the</strong> storm as pro<strong>of</strong> or …. Or what? What exactly are our alternatives? This is beyond<br />

belief: you have to prove whe<strong>the</strong>r it was wind or flood that took your house. It's no longer <strong>the</strong><br />

insurance companies' responsibility to determine this. So, <strong>the</strong> policyholder will have to have a<br />

film or hire an engineer???<br />

We need one insurance policy that covers our home. Period. This would eliminate <strong>the</strong> opposing<br />

companies pointing <strong>the</strong> finger continuously at <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r. This bickering makes money for <strong>the</strong><br />

insurance companies as our claims set in <strong>the</strong>ir accounts drawing interest. But, it bankrupts<br />

families and businesses. Even if it is legal, it is morally wrong. Give us one company to deal<br />

with. We are under enough stress without having to fight for what is owed to us. Hell, with <strong>the</strong><br />

stress this inflicts, <strong>the</strong>y should be paying psychiatric care, too. We paid <strong>the</strong> premiums, insurance<br />

companies should pay <strong>the</strong> claims in an expedient time frame.<br />

And before you write about your tax dollars covering our damages, please realize that this is not<br />

<strong>the</strong> case. It is a closed system ---only those who pay in are eligible to file claims. No one pays in<br />

that isn't a policyholder. One-third <strong>of</strong> all people and businesses in <strong>the</strong> United States are located<br />

in a flood zone. An average <strong>of</strong> 1000 people a day move to <strong>the</strong> United State's coasts. We need<br />

viable building plans and community leadership as <strong>the</strong> population continues to expand into <strong>the</strong><br />

danger zones..<br />

With each hurricane strike, <strong>the</strong> hurricane season seems longer and longer.<br />

Each time we spend those six months repairing from <strong>the</strong> previous six months, <strong>the</strong> "<strong>of</strong>f-season"<br />

seems shorter and shorter. Inevitably, <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>f-season is filled with TV programs and magazine<br />

articles about hurricanes past and what <strong>the</strong> future may hold. Sometimes, I watch <strong>the</strong>m with<br />

morbid fascination, o<strong>the</strong>r times it's too painful and I have to change <strong>the</strong> channel.<br />

Evacuation and hurricane preparation are far different now for <strong>the</strong> residents in my area than when<br />

I moved here 11 years ago. Gone is <strong>the</strong> complacency or illusion that it can't really be all that bad.<br />

For days before <strong>the</strong> storm makes landfall, gasoline is difficult to find and water is a premium<br />

commodity. Before Ivan, people prepared, but it was a more relaxed atmosphere. Now, it feels<br />

like everyone assumes that any hurricane will be ano<strong>the</strong>r Ivan. I know I do. Much more<br />

trepidation is attached to <strong>the</strong> tropical storm season for me now than before 2004's Hurricane Ivan.<br />

The post traumatic stress was evident on <strong>the</strong> faces <strong>of</strong> Ivan's survivors as we prepared for<br />

Hurricanes Dennis and Katrina less than a year later. Overwhelming despair and resignation<br />

resonated from <strong>the</strong> people I passed. Blank stares or streaming tears met my somber gaze.<br />

The outcome could be different, better or worse, on a large scale or on a very local level. The<br />

decisions made today decide which outcome prevails. If you are rebuilding, is it ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

"temporary structure" that will need rebuilding after ano<strong>the</strong>r hurricane? Or will you utilize stronger,<br />

better building techniques? <strong>Dome</strong>s aren't <strong>the</strong> only answer. There are elements we used in<br />

building <strong>the</strong> <strong>Dome</strong> <strong>of</strong> a <strong>Home</strong> that can be incorporated into conventional structures. The foam we<br />

used can be used to increase a conventional structure's ro<strong>of</strong> line and walls. When used as<br />

insulation between <strong>the</strong> walls, o<strong>the</strong>r benefits include its inability to absorb water and promote <strong>the</strong><br />

growth <strong>of</strong> mold and mildew and its superior energy efficiency. We are watching a superb<br />

structure being built on Pensacola Beach by <strong>the</strong> Elks Lodge. It is all concrete – even <strong>the</strong> walls!<br />

They are being put toge<strong>the</strong>r like a 3-D puzzle.<br />

54

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!