28.01.2013 Views

HEARING - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

HEARING - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

HEARING - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

88<br />

n<strong>on</strong>-group subscribers of reporting Plans paid $20 or less per m<strong>on</strong>th, 40 percent paid $30<br />

or less and 75 percent paid under $43. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Medigap coverage is<br />

available in every state.<br />

The Major Catastrophic Acute Care Coverage Ga2: Low-Income Elderly wt<br />

Sunolemental Coverage<br />

While we believe that the Medigap programs offered by Blue Cross and Blue Plans<br />

represent a "good buy' for most beneficiaries, there are those who cannot afford any<br />

private coverage that meets the minimum standards of the Baucus Amendment.<br />

According to a study funded by the Health Care Financing Administrati<strong>on</strong>, about half of<br />

the beneficiaries without supplemental protecti<strong>on</strong> said they simply could not afford it.<br />

This finding is c<strong>on</strong>firmed by a C<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al Budget Office (CBO) analysis showing that<br />

low-income beneficiaries are the <strong>on</strong>es most likely to lack supplemental coverage.<br />

According to CBO, nearly 30 percent of the elderly with incomes under $9,000 lack both<br />

Medigap and Medicaid, versus <strong>on</strong>ly 10 percent of those above $25,000. CBO also found<br />

that Medicaid covers <strong>on</strong>ly 28 percent of the elderly with incomes under $5,000.<br />

Thus the major Issue facing C<strong>on</strong>gress is not a problem of coverage avallabillit but of<br />

afJQdabtiJy to those with limited resources. Accordingly, we believe any new<br />

government program should be targeted to those who cannot afford existing private<br />

coverage, and will suggest a number of opti<strong>on</strong>s to accomplish this. We also believe that<br />

the availability of government coverage - whether voluntary or mandatory - will not<br />

solve the affordability problem. Comprehensive coverage Is not inexpensive, whether<br />

provided by government or the private sector. C<strong>on</strong>versely, providing <strong>on</strong>ly a minimum<br />

level of catastrophic protecti<strong>on</strong> still would leave the low-income elderly exposed to<br />

substantial out-of-pocket expenses.<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!