HEARING - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
HEARING - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
HEARING - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
88<br />
n<strong>on</strong>-group subscribers of reporting Plans paid $20 or less per m<strong>on</strong>th, 40 percent paid $30<br />
or less and 75 percent paid under $43. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Medigap coverage is<br />
available in every state.<br />
The Major Catastrophic Acute Care Coverage Ga2: Low-Income Elderly wt<br />
Sunolemental Coverage<br />
While we believe that the Medigap programs offered by Blue Cross and Blue Plans<br />
represent a "good buy' for most beneficiaries, there are those who cannot afford any<br />
private coverage that meets the minimum standards of the Baucus Amendment.<br />
According to a study funded by the Health Care Financing Administrati<strong>on</strong>, about half of<br />
the beneficiaries without supplemental protecti<strong>on</strong> said they simply could not afford it.<br />
This finding is c<strong>on</strong>firmed by a C<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al Budget Office (CBO) analysis showing that<br />
low-income beneficiaries are the <strong>on</strong>es most likely to lack supplemental coverage.<br />
According to CBO, nearly 30 percent of the elderly with incomes under $9,000 lack both<br />
Medigap and Medicaid, versus <strong>on</strong>ly 10 percent of those above $25,000. CBO also found<br />
that Medicaid covers <strong>on</strong>ly 28 percent of the elderly with incomes under $5,000.<br />
Thus the major Issue facing C<strong>on</strong>gress is not a problem of coverage avallabillit but of<br />
afJQdabtiJy to those with limited resources. Accordingly, we believe any new<br />
government program should be targeted to those who cannot afford existing private<br />
coverage, and will suggest a number of opti<strong>on</strong>s to accomplish this. We also believe that<br />
the availability of government coverage - whether voluntary or mandatory - will not<br />
solve the affordability problem. Comprehensive coverage Is not inexpensive, whether<br />
provided by government or the private sector. C<strong>on</strong>versely, providing <strong>on</strong>ly a minimum<br />
level of catastrophic protecti<strong>on</strong> still would leave the low-income elderly exposed to<br />
substantial out-of-pocket expenses.<br />
5