HEARING - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
HEARING - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
HEARING - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
79<br />
been quite a few articles that have said-and I do not know how<br />
they come up with the numbers-but they say that 70 percent of<br />
the health care costs in the United States are because people abuse<br />
their bodies and bring these costs <strong>on</strong> themselves. So, by getting<br />
people involved in taking care of themselves, you will not have the<br />
health care in the first place.<br />
Chairman MELCHER. Well, I have given up telling my wife it<br />
would be better if she did not smoke, and telling the kids to forget<br />
about so much alcohol.<br />
Mr. SHAPLAND. But there are incentives. I am sort of a nut <strong>on</strong><br />
this subject because I feel very str<strong>on</strong>gly that we should have financial<br />
incentives wellness.<br />
Chairman MELCHER. Well, what I am getting at is <strong>on</strong>e of the witnesses<br />
today graphically dem<strong>on</strong>strated that because her husband<br />
had piled up bills for his health care that she could not handle,<br />
that she was foregoing treatment for her high blood pressure and<br />
some corrective knee surgery.<br />
I do not know what that is going to cost in the l<strong>on</strong>g run, but it<br />
might cost a t<strong>on</strong> of m<strong>on</strong>ey.<br />
Also, Mrs. Yelineck, for reas<strong>on</strong>s I understand, put off surgery she<br />
needed, which was not wise.<br />
Mr. SHAPLAND. Correct.<br />
Chairman MELCHER. Now, I am not going to ask you to do this,<br />
because I think it is too tough to figure out. But when we remove<br />
those obstacles-in this case, for these two witnesses, just to do<br />
what they ought to do, in a timely way-we are cutting down <strong>on</strong><br />
the costs of medicine for them throughout their lives.<br />
Now, obviously, that is a savings, it is an offset. I am not going to<br />
ask you to measure that. I think that is very difficult. The first<br />
<strong>on</strong>e, I do ask you to measure-if at some threshold, each individual<br />
in America would be spending so much for either nursing home or<br />
home health care, what it would cost.<br />
Mr. SHAPLAND. You see, the insurance industry wrestles with<br />
this problem every day and has modernized its coverages-over the<br />
years for this very reas<strong>on</strong>. For example, we ask ourselves if we provide<br />
home health care, isn't that a lot cheaper and better for everybody.<br />
For every dollar <strong>on</strong>e spends <strong>on</strong> home health care, maybe they<br />
save $10 in nursing home costs.<br />
So to the degree that, say, Medicaid does not cover some of those<br />
things, I think you need to think about expanding Medicaid so that<br />
it does. Penny-wise and pound-foolish is what you are talking<br />
about.<br />
Chairman MELCHER. Yes, that is exactly what I am talking<br />
about. Now, I have asked you for three things-first, this actuarial<br />
advice to us, and then for the critique <strong>on</strong> the Harvard Medicare<br />
study-and what was the other <strong>on</strong>e of those?<br />
Mr. SHAPLAND. I have down here that you have asked me to provide<br />
you with the new NAIC standards <strong>on</strong> l<strong>on</strong>g-term care; 4 to read<br />
the Harvard report and give you my analysis of that; 5 to give you<br />
a list of the companies and policies that provide l<strong>on</strong>g-term care cur-<br />
4See appendix, item 8, p. 155.<br />
5 Ibid., p. 150.