28.01.2013 Views

HEARING - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

HEARING - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

HEARING - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

79<br />

been quite a few articles that have said-and I do not know how<br />

they come up with the numbers-but they say that 70 percent of<br />

the health care costs in the United States are because people abuse<br />

their bodies and bring these costs <strong>on</strong> themselves. So, by getting<br />

people involved in taking care of themselves, you will not have the<br />

health care in the first place.<br />

Chairman MELCHER. Well, I have given up telling my wife it<br />

would be better if she did not smoke, and telling the kids to forget<br />

about so much alcohol.<br />

Mr. SHAPLAND. But there are incentives. I am sort of a nut <strong>on</strong><br />

this subject because I feel very str<strong>on</strong>gly that we should have financial<br />

incentives wellness.<br />

Chairman MELCHER. Well, what I am getting at is <strong>on</strong>e of the witnesses<br />

today graphically dem<strong>on</strong>strated that because her husband<br />

had piled up bills for his health care that she could not handle,<br />

that she was foregoing treatment for her high blood pressure and<br />

some corrective knee surgery.<br />

I do not know what that is going to cost in the l<strong>on</strong>g run, but it<br />

might cost a t<strong>on</strong> of m<strong>on</strong>ey.<br />

Also, Mrs. Yelineck, for reas<strong>on</strong>s I understand, put off surgery she<br />

needed, which was not wise.<br />

Mr. SHAPLAND. Correct.<br />

Chairman MELCHER. Now, I am not going to ask you to do this,<br />

because I think it is too tough to figure out. But when we remove<br />

those obstacles-in this case, for these two witnesses, just to do<br />

what they ought to do, in a timely way-we are cutting down <strong>on</strong><br />

the costs of medicine for them throughout their lives.<br />

Now, obviously, that is a savings, it is an offset. I am not going to<br />

ask you to measure that. I think that is very difficult. The first<br />

<strong>on</strong>e, I do ask you to measure-if at some threshold, each individual<br />

in America would be spending so much for either nursing home or<br />

home health care, what it would cost.<br />

Mr. SHAPLAND. You see, the insurance industry wrestles with<br />

this problem every day and has modernized its coverages-over the<br />

years for this very reas<strong>on</strong>. For example, we ask ourselves if we provide<br />

home health care, isn't that a lot cheaper and better for everybody.<br />

For every dollar <strong>on</strong>e spends <strong>on</strong> home health care, maybe they<br />

save $10 in nursing home costs.<br />

So to the degree that, say, Medicaid does not cover some of those<br />

things, I think you need to think about expanding Medicaid so that<br />

it does. Penny-wise and pound-foolish is what you are talking<br />

about.<br />

Chairman MELCHER. Yes, that is exactly what I am talking<br />

about. Now, I have asked you for three things-first, this actuarial<br />

advice to us, and then for the critique <strong>on</strong> the Harvard Medicare<br />

study-and what was the other <strong>on</strong>e of those?<br />

Mr. SHAPLAND. I have down here that you have asked me to provide<br />

you with the new NAIC standards <strong>on</strong> l<strong>on</strong>g-term care; 4 to read<br />

the Harvard report and give you my analysis of that; 5 to give you<br />

a list of the companies and policies that provide l<strong>on</strong>g-term care cur-<br />

4See appendix, item 8, p. 155.<br />

5 Ibid., p. 150.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!