HEARING - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
HEARING - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
HEARING - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
71<br />
be a fair distributi<strong>on</strong> of the losses of those pools. That would require<br />
an act of C<strong>on</strong>gress to change that.<br />
Senator WILSON. OK. I gather from the comments you have<br />
made that you and your industry are not a supporter of the Bowen<br />
proposal and that you feel that insofar as it supplements existing<br />
gaps in Medicare, that it is not going to do the job, and yet I understood-perhaps<br />
this is your pers<strong>on</strong>al view that you were expressing<br />
earlier-you said there is need for some tax dollars to be spent to<br />
take care of people who have problems of the kinds we heard described<br />
this morning.<br />
Is it your industry positi<strong>on</strong> that more coverage needs to be afforded<br />
by additi<strong>on</strong>al Medigap coverage from the private sector?<br />
Mr. SHAPLAND. Let me first of all correct a possible misunderstanding<br />
about Bowen and the health insurance industry's positi<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Bowen has many proposals. He had <strong>on</strong>e <strong>on</strong> expanding Medigap.<br />
We say that is unnecessary because the people already have the<br />
coverage, and he is <strong>on</strong>ly making it available <strong>on</strong> an opti<strong>on</strong>al basis,<br />
and whoever wanted to buy insurance has already bought it so it is<br />
not going to do anything; it is not attacking the real areas of<br />
need-l<strong>on</strong>g-term care, drug care, and so <strong>on</strong>. His proposal does not<br />
hit that. And that is why we say that that proposal is not a very<br />
good <strong>on</strong>e.<br />
But Bowen has many other proposals to fill gaps-employers who<br />
cannot afford group insurance <strong>on</strong> their own without some help;<br />
lower-income people who cannot afford the full cost of insurance,<br />
and so <strong>on</strong>.<br />
Senator WILSON. And who do not qualify for Medicaid, either?<br />
Mr. SHAPLAND. Right; they fall between being able to buy private<br />
insurance and Medicaid. And those things, we support; I mean, he<br />
is <strong>on</strong> target, that where people cannot afford to buy private insurance,<br />
maybe the Government needs to help subsidize insurance,<br />
subsidize l<strong>on</strong>g-term care insurance and so <strong>on</strong> to cover that missing<br />
ground, some of those loopholes.<br />
Senator WILSON. All right. On page 3 of your statement you have<br />
indicated that some 70 percent of Medicare beneficiaries use private<br />
supplemental insurance; that another 10 percent of the remaining<br />
uncovered 30 actually fall under Medicaid. So that leaves<br />
<strong>on</strong>ly 20 percent of those over 65 without protecti<strong>on</strong> against gaps in<br />
Medicare.<br />
Mr. SHAPLAND. Right.<br />
Senator WILSON. What I think I heard you saying is that the industry<br />
supports the provisi<strong>on</strong> of l<strong>on</strong>g-term care and is looking to<br />
the private sector to provide that care.<br />
Mr. SHAPLAND. The l<strong>on</strong>g-term care has nothing to do with what<br />
you just menti<strong>on</strong>ed. It has nothing to do with Baucus or Medicare<br />
or Medigap. It is a completely different area of insurance. I just<br />
-want to make sure you understand that.<br />
Senator WILSON. All right. Let us focus <strong>on</strong> the l<strong>on</strong>g-term care.<br />
How does the industry see that need being filled?<br />
Mr. SHAPLAND. OK. We see, as I think almost everybody seesand<br />
I do not know if there is much disagreement <strong>on</strong> this, even in<br />
discussi<strong>on</strong>s privately with various C<strong>on</strong>gressmen and so <strong>on</strong>-the cost<br />
of providing needed coverage for l<strong>on</strong>g-term care is almost bey<strong>on</strong>d