HEARING - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

HEARING - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging HEARING - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

aging.senate.gov
from aging.senate.gov More from this publisher
28.01.2013 Views

151 2 the $1,200 which is mentioned later in this letter are because it represents the premium at age 65 as opposed to the premium for the composite of all ages above 65, benefits are limited to $40 per day as opposed to providing for full charges, and benefits are limited to care received in a skilled nursing facility. Additional insight regarding affordability of private long-term care insurance is gained by comparing an average premium (e.g., $1,200) with income figures contained in "Aging America, Trends and Projections" prepared by your committee. For example, page 41 shows that the median income in 1984 for persons age 65 and over was $7,349. Table 3-1 graphically displays distributions by level of income and I presume that more definitive data was available to support this graph. I am also attaching a table which shows a distribution of income by size, age, and sex for 1983. You also asked for some information regarding the cost of long-term care insurance, especially if there was a spend-down deductible provision. In response, I have gathered some information which might be helpful in giving you a rough idea of the costs involved. The figures that I found are for the year 1984. These figures show the following expenditures in 1984 for people aged 65 and over for nursing home charges: Total Charges .$.. . . . . . I . . . . . . . . 525,105,000,000 Portion Paid by Patients (Out-of-Pocket). . . . 12,569,000,000 Portion Paid by Private Insurance and other Private Sources. . . . . . . . . . . 469,000,000 Portion Paid by Medicare. . . . . . . . . . . . 539,000,000 Portion Paid by Medicaid. . . . . . . . . . . . 10,418,000,000 Portion Paid by Other Govt. Programs. . . . . . 1,110,000,000 Since there were approximately 28.5 million persons over age 65 in 1984, this means that the total cost of nursing home care per person over age 65 was approximately S$So in 1984. Since the average cost per stay in a nursing home was around 522,000, a $2,000 deductible would still leave $20,000 out-of-pocket. In other words, it would reduce the cost that would have to be met by some insurance program by 2/22 or 9%. Since the cost per person was $880, a $2,000 deductible would reduce this to $800. This means that an average insurance premium to cover nursing home costs after a $2,000 deductible would cost $800 for claims and possibly another $400 for marketing and administrative expenses, making the total premium $1,200.* This is a rough estimate of the average premium if all 28.5 million participated in a program that paid 100% of charges in excess of $2,000 without limit. Actually, premiums would probably vary by age at issue and reflect the impact of some underwriting selection and limitations on daily benefit levels. *This is for individual insurance. Group policies would involve lower expenses and premiums.

152 All Of these figures are based on 1984 data and would have to be adjusted upward for the inflation that has taken place since that time. I have reviewed the Harvard report entitled "Medicare: Coming of Age, A Proposal for Reform" and find that it discusses many avenues for controlling Medicare costs that call for additional analysis and possibly testing of their practicality. Here, increasing price competition among providers might have been included. Regarding proposed changes in Medicare's benefit structure, I believe they may have overlooked the fact that the vast majority of the elderly have supplemental insurance via private plans or Medicaid. Further, their suggestion that Medicare be expanded to cover annual physical exams should be supported by studies of their impact on health rather than assumptions. 3 Also, the statement that private Medicare Supplement plans duplicate Medicare benefits is false as I stated at your hearing. I believe their concerns regarding the viability of private longterm care insurance are unfounded. First, their statement that younger citizens are unwilling to purchase such insurance is not supported by any study and is made at a time when citizens have misunderstandings regarding Medicare benefits for this care... Second, private plans cover home health care contrary to their statement. Finally, the report overlooks the funding of private insurance on a group basis which entails minimal administrative expense. One final observation is that the report does not make suggestions that would help the aged file claims under the Medicare program. From personal experience, I suspect that few of the elderly understand the claim filing system and this creates problems for them. One solution would be to require all providers to file the claims for their Medicare patients. Senator Melcher, again we appreciate the opportunity to present the views of the health insurance industry and want you to know that you should feel free to call on us if we can be of further service in this matter. 028718/mm Encls. Sincerely yours, Robert B. Shapland Vice President and Actuary

152<br />

All Of these figures are based <strong>on</strong> 1984 data and would have to be<br />

adjusted upward for the inflati<strong>on</strong> that has taken place since that<br />

time.<br />

I have reviewed the Harvard report entitled "Medicare: Coming of<br />

Age, A Proposal for Reform" and find that it discusses many avenues<br />

for c<strong>on</strong>trolling Medicare costs that call for additi<strong>on</strong>al analysis and<br />

possibly testing of their practicality. Here, increasing price<br />

competiti<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g providers might have been included.<br />

Regarding proposed changes in Medicare's benefit structure, I<br />

believe they may have overlooked the fact that the vast majority of<br />

the elderly have supplemental insurance via private plans or Medicaid.<br />

Further, their suggesti<strong>on</strong> that Medicare be expanded to cover<br />

annual physical exams should be supported by studies of their impact<br />

<strong>on</strong> health rather than assumpti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

3<br />

Also, the statement that private<br />

Medicare Supplement plans duplicate Medicare benefits is false as I<br />

stated at your hearing.<br />

I believe their c<strong>on</strong>cerns regarding the viability of private l<strong>on</strong>gterm<br />

care insurance are unfounded. First, their statement that<br />

younger citizens are unwilling to purchase such insurance is not<br />

supported by any study and is made at a time when citizens have<br />

misunderstandings regarding Medicare benefits for this care...<br />

Sec<strong>on</strong>d, private plans cover home health care c<strong>on</strong>trary to their<br />

statement. Finally, the report overlooks the funding of private<br />

insurance <strong>on</strong> a group basis which entails minimal administrative<br />

expense.<br />

One final observati<strong>on</strong> is that the report does not make suggesti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

that would help the aged file claims under the Medicare program.<br />

From pers<strong>on</strong>al experience, I suspect that few of the elderly understand<br />

the claim filing system and this creates problems for them.<br />

One soluti<strong>on</strong> would be to require all providers to file the claims<br />

for their Medicare patients.<br />

Senator Melcher, again we appreciate the opportunity to present the<br />

views of the health insurance industry and want you to know that you<br />

should feel free to call <strong>on</strong> us if we can be of further service in<br />

this matter.<br />

028718/mm<br />

Encls.<br />

Sincerely yours,<br />

Robert B. Shapland<br />

Vice President and Actuary

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!