HEARING - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
HEARING - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging HEARING - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
151 2 the $1,200 which is mentioned later in this letter are because it represents the premium at age 65 as opposed to the premium for the composite of all ages above 65, benefits are limited to $40 per day as opposed to providing for full charges, and benefits are limited to care received in a skilled nursing facility. Additional insight regarding affordability of private long-term care insurance is gained by comparing an average premium (e.g., $1,200) with income figures contained in "Aging America, Trends and Projections" prepared by your committee. For example, page 41 shows that the median income in 1984 for persons age 65 and over was $7,349. Table 3-1 graphically displays distributions by level of income and I presume that more definitive data was available to support this graph. I am also attaching a table which shows a distribution of income by size, age, and sex for 1983. You also asked for some information regarding the cost of long-term care insurance, especially if there was a spend-down deductible provision. In response, I have gathered some information which might be helpful in giving you a rough idea of the costs involved. The figures that I found are for the year 1984. These figures show the following expenditures in 1984 for people aged 65 and over for nursing home charges: Total Charges .$.. . . . . . I . . . . . . . . 525,105,000,000 Portion Paid by Patients (Out-of-Pocket). . . . 12,569,000,000 Portion Paid by Private Insurance and other Private Sources. . . . . . . . . . . 469,000,000 Portion Paid by Medicare. . . . . . . . . . . . 539,000,000 Portion Paid by Medicaid. . . . . . . . . . . . 10,418,000,000 Portion Paid by Other Govt. Programs. . . . . . 1,110,000,000 Since there were approximately 28.5 million persons over age 65 in 1984, this means that the total cost of nursing home care per person over age 65 was approximately S$So in 1984. Since the average cost per stay in a nursing home was around 522,000, a $2,000 deductible would still leave $20,000 out-of-pocket. In other words, it would reduce the cost that would have to be met by some insurance program by 2/22 or 9%. Since the cost per person was $880, a $2,000 deductible would reduce this to $800. This means that an average insurance premium to cover nursing home costs after a $2,000 deductible would cost $800 for claims and possibly another $400 for marketing and administrative expenses, making the total premium $1,200.* This is a rough estimate of the average premium if all 28.5 million participated in a program that paid 100% of charges in excess of $2,000 without limit. Actually, premiums would probably vary by age at issue and reflect the impact of some underwriting selection and limitations on daily benefit levels. *This is for individual insurance. Group policies would involve lower expenses and premiums.
152 All Of these figures are based on 1984 data and would have to be adjusted upward for the inflation that has taken place since that time. I have reviewed the Harvard report entitled "Medicare: Coming of Age, A Proposal for Reform" and find that it discusses many avenues for controlling Medicare costs that call for additional analysis and possibly testing of their practicality. Here, increasing price competition among providers might have been included. Regarding proposed changes in Medicare's benefit structure, I believe they may have overlooked the fact that the vast majority of the elderly have supplemental insurance via private plans or Medicaid. Further, their suggestion that Medicare be expanded to cover annual physical exams should be supported by studies of their impact on health rather than assumptions. 3 Also, the statement that private Medicare Supplement plans duplicate Medicare benefits is false as I stated at your hearing. I believe their concerns regarding the viability of private longterm care insurance are unfounded. First, their statement that younger citizens are unwilling to purchase such insurance is not supported by any study and is made at a time when citizens have misunderstandings regarding Medicare benefits for this care... Second, private plans cover home health care contrary to their statement. Finally, the report overlooks the funding of private insurance on a group basis which entails minimal administrative expense. One final observation is that the report does not make suggestions that would help the aged file claims under the Medicare program. From personal experience, I suspect that few of the elderly understand the claim filing system and this creates problems for them. One solution would be to require all providers to file the claims for their Medicare patients. Senator Melcher, again we appreciate the opportunity to present the views of the health insurance industry and want you to know that you should feel free to call on us if we can be of further service in this matter. 028718/mm Encls. Sincerely yours, Robert B. Shapland Vice President and Actuary
- Page 103 and 104: 100 Catastrophic Protection within
- Page 105 and 106: 102 - a - participants and in part
- Page 107 and 108: 104 - 2-- Consumers Union suV orts
- Page 109 and 110: 106 29), but fails to acknowledge t
- Page 111 and 112: 108 explore all alternatives to lon
- Page 113 and 114: 110 adds to the complexity of Medic
- Page 115 and 116: 112 - 10- Consider first the propos
- Page 117 and 118: 114 - 12- insurance premiums and me
- Page 119 and 120: Consunmer Unon Pubtishcr of Consume
- Page 121 and 122: FOR RELEASE AT 9:00 P.M. H2ST) TUES
- Page 123 and 124: 120 Itema I CENTER FOR MEDICARE ALw
- Page 125 and 126: Page 3 122 aide services, however,
- Page 127 and 128: Page 5 state treasuries." 124 Judge
- Page 129 and 130: 126 462 6485 New Developments 10,05
- Page 131 and 132: 128 462 6-85 New Developments 10,05
- Page 133 and 134: 130 462 6-85 New Developments 10,05
- Page 135 and 136: 132 10,930 New Developments tI.PZ ;
- Page 137 and 138: 10,932 134 New Davelopments 492 346
- Page 139 and 140: 136 10,934 New Developments It! ;6
- Page 141 and 142: 10,936 138 New Developmenlt I. Thc
- Page 143 and 144: 140 10,938 New Development. 492 S-8
- Page 145 and 146: 10,940 142 New Developments i92 586
- Page 147 and 148: ATroR EYS -HARLES C. -ULiIN JUDITH
- Page 149 and 150: 146 reformed its decision-making pr
- Page 151 and 152: 148 : 14 2i57 New Developments 13,1
- Page 153: ~ 150 a>, rsn Cdw ~w (e d rum 0A7,.
- Page 157 and 158: 154 The requirements of this Act sh
- Page 159 and 160: 156 Drefting Note: Where the word "
- Page 161 and 162: 158 (b) The issuance of the group p
- Page 163 and 164: 160 (2) Contain a provision establi
- Page 165 and 166: 162 and competitive reasons. It is
- Page 167 and 168: 164 -13- E. Affordability of Long T
- Page 169 and 170: NAIC LTC ADVISORY COMMITEE EXPOSURE
- Page 171 and 172: Setinzn IS. Poicyx D~efinitieno aid
- Page 173 and 174: 170 3. The term "noncancellable' ma
- Page 175 and 176: 172 extension of benefits beyond th
- Page 177 and 178: artinM B Requirmnts for Rplnmacwt 1
- Page 179 and 180: 176 The above "Notice to Applicant"
- Page 181 and 182: (pinnal Rasting &mdsninn 178 Benefi
- Page 183 and 184: APPEMI!X B 180 OCWARISCN OF lVLCY i
- Page 185 and 186: COMPAIeSON OF LOtG TEIM CoAt PfLtCI
- Page 187 and 188: COMPABI:SZN OF LC#C TE" CAiE -OLICI
- Page 189 and 190: COWaPAISON Of LOSt TERM CARE POLICI
- Page 191 and 192: cowRiiSOi or touTE reM CasE nOuczcS
- Page 193 and 194: COGPARISON OF LONG TERM CARE POLICI
- Page 195 and 196: SOME BASIC THINGS YOU SHOULD KNOW M
- Page 197 and 198: Private health insurance is availab
- Page 199 and 200: WHAT MEDICARE PART B PAYS 196 MEDIC
- Page 201 and 202: EXPENSES NOT COVERED BY MEDICARE Me
152<br />
All Of these figures are based <strong>on</strong> 1984 data and would have to be<br />
adjusted upward for the inflati<strong>on</strong> that has taken place since that<br />
time.<br />
I have reviewed the Harvard report entitled "Medicare: Coming of<br />
Age, A Proposal for Reform" and find that it discusses many avenues<br />
for c<strong>on</strong>trolling Medicare costs that call for additi<strong>on</strong>al analysis and<br />
possibly testing of their practicality. Here, increasing price<br />
competiti<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g providers might have been included.<br />
Regarding proposed changes in Medicare's benefit structure, I<br />
believe they may have overlooked the fact that the vast majority of<br />
the elderly have supplemental insurance via private plans or Medicaid.<br />
Further, their suggesti<strong>on</strong> that Medicare be expanded to cover<br />
annual physical exams should be supported by studies of their impact<br />
<strong>on</strong> health rather than assumpti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
3<br />
Also, the statement that private<br />
Medicare Supplement plans duplicate Medicare benefits is false as I<br />
stated at your hearing.<br />
I believe their c<strong>on</strong>cerns regarding the viability of private l<strong>on</strong>gterm<br />
care insurance are unfounded. First, their statement that<br />
younger citizens are unwilling to purchase such insurance is not<br />
supported by any study and is made at a time when citizens have<br />
misunderstandings regarding Medicare benefits for this care...<br />
Sec<strong>on</strong>d, private plans cover home health care c<strong>on</strong>trary to their<br />
statement. Finally, the report overlooks the funding of private<br />
insurance <strong>on</strong> a group basis which entails minimal administrative<br />
expense.<br />
One final observati<strong>on</strong> is that the report does not make suggesti<strong>on</strong>s<br />
that would help the aged file claims under the Medicare program.<br />
From pers<strong>on</strong>al experience, I suspect that few of the elderly understand<br />
the claim filing system and this creates problems for them.<br />
One soluti<strong>on</strong> would be to require all providers to file the claims<br />
for their Medicare patients.<br />
Senator Melcher, again we appreciate the opportunity to present the<br />
views of the health insurance industry and want you to know that you<br />
should feel free to call <strong>on</strong> us if we can be of further service in<br />
this matter.<br />
028718/mm<br />
Encls.<br />
Sincerely yours,<br />
Robert B. Shapland<br />
Vice President and Actuary