HEARING - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
HEARING - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
HEARING - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
115<br />
- 13-<br />
(B) State risk pools. If the goal is to increase the<br />
adopti<strong>on</strong> of state risk pools, it is not sufficient to merely<br />
"encourage the formati<strong>on</strong> of state risk pools to subsidize<br />
insurance for those whose medical c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> makes it impossible<br />
or prohibitively expensive to get insurance." [p. 114].<br />
Legislati<strong>on</strong> is needed to provide states with str<strong>on</strong>g incentives<br />
to establish such risk pools.<br />
(C) Medicaid Exoansi<strong>on</strong> Opti<strong>on</strong>. One positive opti<strong>on</strong><br />
discussed in the Report is not recommended: "Permit all<br />
individuals below some income level to purchase Medicaid<br />
coverage <strong>on</strong> a sliding premium scale depending <strong>on</strong> income." [p.<br />
87-. The Report estimates that if the plan included all people<br />
under 125% of the poverty line, with premiums limited to 5% of<br />
income could cost as much as $15 billi<strong>on</strong> if all eligible people<br />
enrolled. The Report fails to estimate the cost savings that<br />
would be achieved: many people presently <strong>on</strong> AFDC and medicaid<br />
are deterred from taking a job because they will become<br />
ineligible for medicaid and will be unable to obtain affordable<br />
health insurance. Note also that even this inflated cost<br />
estimate is less than the present federal subsidy for the<br />
exclusi<strong>on</strong> from taxati<strong>on</strong> of the employer-paid health insurance<br />
premiums (which benefit primarily middle and upper-income<br />
people).