HEARING - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

HEARING - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging HEARING - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

aging.senate.gov
from aging.senate.gov More from this publisher
28.01.2013 Views

99 - 5 - (4) exaggerated the coverage offered by policies and failed to disclose the substantial limits and exceptions to coverage. The California Insurance Commissioner is expected to act soon by granting a substantial portion of the petition. State insurance commissions, the Department of Health and Human Services, and Consumer Reports (in a June 1984 article rating medigap policies) have attempted to educate consumers about medigap policies and their limits. But despite these efforts, consumers continue to be uninformed and purchase duplicative and low value policies. Consumers are confused, and for good reason. Medicare -- with its Parts A and B, coinsurance, deductibles, skilled nursing facilities, intermediate care facilities, benefit periods, lifetime reserve days, physician assignment, etc. -- is an impossible maze, defeating even the most educated consumers. It is no wonder few consumers understand that Medicare largely fails to provide long-term care coverage. Adding to this confusion, consumers must comprehend a variety of private policies marketed to the elderly (often through deceptive marketing techniques)-- medigap policies, hospital indemnity policies, dread disease coverage. It should come as no surprise that research shows that the level of knowledge the elderly have about Medicare and private insurance is extremely low. Based on the medigap market's overall performance record, there is no justification to rely on it for catastrophic or long-term care insurance.

100 Catastrophic Protection within Medicare Consumers Union strongly supports the concept of restructuring Medicare to provide the elderly with protection against catastrophic illness. Secretary Bowen's proposal regarding catastrophic expenses of the elderly would greatly benefit those individuals with the most severe medical expenses. With Medicare paying less than one half of the health care costs of the elderly, there is clearly a compelling need for this protection. The cost of catastrophic illness on the elderly often imposes a serious financial burden. Data contained in Secretary Bowen's Report indicate that lot of the elderly have out-of-pocket health care liabilities of $1000 or more a year. [Bowen Report, p. 26] Additionally, this financial burden doss not fall according to ability to pay. Expected out-of-pocket expenditures represent a much larger percent of income for low-income consumers than of higher income consumers. [Changing the Structure of Medicare Benefits: Issues and Options, Congressional Budget Office, March, 1983] We recognize that a catastrophic insurance program of the type proposed by Secretary Bowen would displace a portion of nedigap policies and would force many medigap policies to restructure their benefits. we welcome this shift to the public sector, because we believe that an expanded Medicare can serve consumers far better than the private medigap market. Medicare's administrative costs are 3% [The Medicare and Medicaid Data Book, Health Care Financing Administration, 1983,

100<br />

Catastrophic Protecti<strong>on</strong> within Medicare<br />

C<strong>on</strong>sumers Uni<strong>on</strong> str<strong>on</strong>gly supports the c<strong>on</strong>cept of<br />

restructuring Medicare to provide the elderly with protecti<strong>on</strong><br />

against catastrophic illness. Secretary Bowen's proposal<br />

regarding catastrophic expenses of the elderly would greatly<br />

benefit those individuals with the most severe medical<br />

expenses. With Medicare paying less than <strong>on</strong>e half of the health<br />

care costs of the elderly, there is clearly a compelling need<br />

for this protecti<strong>on</strong>. The cost of catastrophic illness <strong>on</strong> the<br />

elderly often imposes a serious financial burden. Data<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tained in Secretary Bowen's Report indicate that lot of the<br />

elderly have out-of-pocket health care liabilities of $1000 or<br />

more a year. [Bowen Report, p. 26] Additi<strong>on</strong>ally, this financial<br />

burden doss not fall according to ability to pay. Expected<br />

out-of-pocket expenditures represent a much larger percent of<br />

income for low-income c<strong>on</strong>sumers than of higher income c<strong>on</strong>sumers.<br />

[Changing the Structure of Medicare Benefits: Issues and<br />

Opti<strong>on</strong>s, C<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al Budget Office, March, 1983]<br />

We recognize that a catastrophic insurance program of the<br />

type proposed by Secretary Bowen would displace a porti<strong>on</strong> of<br />

nedigap policies and would force many medigap policies to<br />

restructure their benefits. we welcome this shift to the public<br />

sector, because we believe that an expanded Medicare can serve<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sumers far better than the private medigap market.<br />

Medicare's administrative costs are 3% [The Medicare and<br />

Medicaid Data Book, Health Care Financing Administrati<strong>on</strong>, 1983,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!