May 24, 2012 - EWMA
May 24, 2012 - EWMA May 24, 2012 - EWMA
MY FOOT Volume 12 Number 2 May 2012 Published by European Wound Management Association
- Page 2 and 3: The EWMA Journal ISSN number: 1609-
- Page 4 and 5: Customised V.A.C. ® Therapy, for f
- Page 6 and 7: ETHICAL COLLABORATION IN HEALTHCARE
- Page 8 and 9: in the foot being vulnerable to inf
- Page 10 and 11: treatment which includes surgical p
- Page 12 and 13: Science, Practice and Education 5.
- Page 14 and 15: Askina ® Calgitrol ® Paste A soft
- Page 16 and 17: 1st International Course on The Neu
- Page 18 and 19: 10th Scientific Meeting of the Diab
- Page 20 and 21: Science, Practice and Education hav
- Page 22 and 23: Is the chemistry right? EWMA When i
- Page 24 and 25: THE EWMA UNIVERSITY CONFERENCE MODE
- Page 26 and 27: phages). Phages, as natural entitie
- Page 28 and 29: Science, Practice and Education bec
- Page 30 and 31: “ Highly absorbent - easy to use.
- Page 32 and 33: in the way professions operate inte
- Page 34 and 35: Science, Practice and Education An
- Page 36 and 37: Science, Practice and Education Dr
- Page 38 and 39: Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers in a
- Page 40 and 41: Dr. Winter 3,4 was a revolution tha
- Page 42 and 43: EWMA DOCUMENTS EWMA Documents on De
- Page 44 and 45: Science, Practice and Education (wo
- Page 46 and 47: Science, Practice and Education 2.
- Page 49 and 50: ABSTRACTS OF RECENT COCHRANE REVIEW
- Page 51 and 52: Main results: We included six studi
MY FOOT<br />
Volume 12<br />
Number 2<br />
<strong>May</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
Published by<br />
European<br />
Wound Management<br />
Association
The <strong>EWMA</strong> Journal<br />
ISSN number: 1609-2759<br />
Volume 12, No 2, <strong>May</strong>, <strong>2012</strong><br />
Electronic Supplement <strong>May</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
www.ewma.org<br />
The Journal of the European<br />
Wound Management Association<br />
Published two times a year<br />
Editorial Board<br />
Sue Bale, UK, Editor<br />
Jan Apelqvist, Sweden<br />
Martin Koschnick, Germany<br />
Zena Moore, Ireland<br />
Marco Romanelli, Italy<br />
Rytis Rimdeika, Lithuania<br />
José Verdú Soriano, Spain<br />
Rita Gaspar Videira, Portugal<br />
Salla Seppänen, Finland<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> web site<br />
www.ewma.org<br />
Editorial Office<br />
please contact:<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Secretariat<br />
Nordre Fasanvej 113<br />
2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark.<br />
Tel: (+45) 7020 0305<br />
Fax: (+45) 7020 0315<br />
ewma@ewma.org<br />
Layout:<br />
Birgitte Clematide<br />
Printed by:<br />
CS Grafisk A/S, Denmark<br />
Copies printed: 12.000<br />
Prices:<br />
The <strong>EWMA</strong> Journal is distributed<br />
in hard copies to members<br />
as part of their <strong>EWMA</strong> membership.<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> also shares the vision of<br />
an “open access” philosophy,<br />
which means that the journal is<br />
freely available online.<br />
Individual subscription per issue: 7.50€<br />
Libraries and institutions per issue: 25€<br />
The next issue will be published<br />
in October <strong>2012</strong>. Prospective material for<br />
publication must be with the editors<br />
as soon as possible and no later<br />
than August 1st, <strong>2012</strong>.<br />
The contents of articles and letters in<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal do not necessarily reflect<br />
the opinions of the Editors or the<br />
European Wound Management Association.<br />
All scientific articles are peer reviewed by<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Scientific Review Panel.<br />
Copyright of published material<br />
and illustrations is the property of<br />
the European Wound Management<br />
Association. However, provided prior<br />
written consent for their reproduction,<br />
including parallel publishing<br />
(e.g. via repository), obtained from <strong>EWMA</strong><br />
via the Editorial Board of the Journal,<br />
and proper acknowledgement and<br />
printed, such permission will normally<br />
be readily granted. Requests to<br />
reproduce material should state<br />
where material is to be published,<br />
and, if it is abstracted, summarised,<br />
or abbreviated, then the proposed<br />
new text should be sent to the<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal Editor for final approval.<br />
2<br />
All issues of <strong>EWMA</strong> Journal<br />
are CINAHL listed.<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong><br />
Council<br />
Sebastian Probst<br />
CO-OPERATING ORGANISATIONS’ BOARD<br />
Christian Thyse, AFISCeP.be<br />
Tommaso Bianchi, AISLeC<br />
Roberto Cassino, AIUC<br />
Aníbal Justiniano, APTFeridas<br />
Gerald Zöch, AWA<br />
Jan Vandeputte, BEFEWO<br />
Vladislav Hristov, BWA<br />
Els Jonckheere, CNC<br />
Lenka Veverková, CSLR<br />
Nastja Kucišec-Tepeš, CWA<br />
Martin Koschnick, DGfW<br />
Bo Jørgensen, DSFS<br />
Anna Hjerppe, FWCS<br />
Pedro Pacheco, GAIF<br />
J. Javier Soldevilla, GNEAUPP<br />
Corrado M. Durante<br />
Treasurer<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> JOURNAL SCIENTIFIC REVIEW PANEL<br />
Paulo Jorge Pereira Alves, Portugal<br />
Caroline Amery, UK<br />
Jan Apelqvist, Sweden<br />
Sue Bale, UK<br />
Michelle Briggs, UK<br />
Stephen Britland, UK<br />
Mark Collier, UK<br />
Rose Cooper, UK<br />
B. E. den Boogert-Ruimschotel, Netherlands<br />
Javorka Delic, Serbia<br />
Corrado Maria Durante, Italy<br />
Bulent Erdogan, Turkey<br />
Madeleine Flanagan, UK<br />
Milada Francu˚, Czech Republic<br />
Peter Franks, UK<br />
Francisco P. García-Fernández, Spain<br />
Jan Apelqvist<br />
President<br />
Gerrolt Jukema<br />
Recorder<br />
Christian Münter, ICW<br />
Aleksandra Kuspelo, LBAA<br />
Susan Knight, LUF<br />
Loreta Pilipaityte, LWMA<br />
Corinne Ward, MASC<br />
Hunyadi János, MSKT<br />
Suzana Nikolovska, MWMA<br />
Alison Johnstone, NATVNS<br />
Kristin Bergersen, NIFS<br />
Louk van Doorn, NOVW<br />
Arkadiusz Jawień, PWMA<br />
Severin Läuchli, SAfW (DE)<br />
Hubert Vuagnat, SAfW (FR)<br />
Goran D. Lazovic, SAWMA<br />
Mária Hok, SEBINKO<br />
Zena Moore<br />
Immediate Past President<br />
Patricia Price<br />
Secretary<br />
Paulo Alves Sue Bale<br />
Barbara E.<br />
Mark Collier Javorka Delic<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal Editor den Boogert-Ruimschotel<br />
Luc Gryson Eskild W. Henneberg Dubravko Huljev Nada Kecelj-Leskovec Martin Koschnick<br />
Elia Ricci Rytis Rimdeika Salla Seppänen Robert Strohal José Verdú Soriano<br />
Luc Gryson, Belgium<br />
Marcus Gürgen, Norway<br />
Eskild W. Henneberg, Denmark<br />
Alison Hopkins, UK<br />
Gabriela Hösl, Austria<br />
Dubravko Huljev, Croatia<br />
Gerrolt Jukema, Netherlands<br />
Nada Kecelj, Slovenia<br />
Klaus Kirketerp-Møller, Denmark<br />
Karsten Knobloch, Germany<br />
Zoltán Kökény, Hungary<br />
Martin Koschnick, Germany<br />
Severin Läuchli, Schwitzerland<br />
Maarten J. Lubbers, Netherlands<br />
Sylvie Meaume, France<br />
Zena Moore, UK<br />
F. Xavier Santos Heredero, SEHER<br />
Sylvie Meaume, SFFPC<br />
Susanne Dufva, SSIS<br />
Jozefa Košková, SSOOR<br />
Leonid Rubanov, STW (Belarus)<br />
Guðbjörg Pálsdóttir, SUMS<br />
Javorca Delic, SWHS Serbia<br />
Magnus Löndahl, SWHS Sweden<br />
Alison Hopkins, TVS<br />
Jasmina Begić-Rahić, URuBiH<br />
Zoya Ishkova, UWTO<br />
Barbara E. den Boogert-Ruimschotel, V&VN<br />
Georgina Gethin, WMAI<br />
Skender Zatriqi, WMAK<br />
Nada Kecelj Leskovec, WMAS<br />
Mustafa Deveci, WMAT<br />
Christian Münter, Germany<br />
Andrea Nelson, UK<br />
Pedro L. Pancorbo-Hidalgo, Spain<br />
Hugo Partsch, Austria<br />
Patricia Price, UK<br />
Sebastian Probst, Schwitzerland<br />
Elia Ricci, Italy<br />
Rytis Rimdeika, Lithuania<br />
Zbigniew Rybak, Poland<br />
Salla Seppänen, Finland<br />
José Verdú Soriano, Spain<br />
Robert Strohal, Austria<br />
Carolyn Wyndham-White, Switzerland<br />
Gerald Zöch, Austria
5 Editorial<br />
Science, Practice and Education<br />
7 A structured approach to surgical treatment in deep<br />
infection in diabetic foot<br />
Cedomir S Vucetic, Javorka B Delic, Zoran S Vukasinovic,<br />
Goran Dz Tulic, Ivan K Dimitrijevic, Cedo Dj Vuckovic,<br />
Vesna K Kalezic<br />
15 Endothelial progenitor cells, a unipotent stem cell, involved<br />
in neovascularization of wound healing in diabetic foot ulcer<br />
Jacqueline Chor Wing Tama, Chun Hay Ko, Ping Chung Leung,<br />
Kwok Pui Fung, Clara Bik San Lau<br />
23 Bacteriophages for the treatment of severe infections:<br />
– a ‘new’ option for the future?<br />
Daniel De Vos, Gilbert Verbeken, Thomas Rose, Serge Jennes, Jean-<br />
Paul Pirnay<br />
31 Developing evidence-based ways of working:<br />
– Employing interdisciplinary team working to improve patient<br />
outcomes in diabetic foot ulceration – our experience<br />
Kristien Van Acker<br />
36 Exploring the characteristics of a venous leg ulcer that contribute<br />
to the emotional distress experienced by patients<br />
Jessica Walburn, John Weinman, Suzanne Scott, Kavita Vedhara<br />
39 Development of a wound healing index for chronic wounds<br />
Juan Carlos Restrepo-Medrano, José Verdú Soriano<br />
Cochrane Reviews<br />
49 Abstracts of Recent Cochrane Reviews<br />
Sally Bell-Syer<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong><br />
56 <strong>EWMA</strong> Journal Previous Issues and other Journals<br />
58 <strong>EWMA</strong> Teacher network<br />
Zena Moore<br />
58 Austrian Diabetic Foot Symposium, <strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
60 <strong>EWMA</strong> Update, The Patient Outcome Group<br />
Patricia Price<br />
62 We want to make a difference! – <strong>EWMA</strong> future projects<br />
Jan Apelqvist<br />
64 EU ‘Week For Life’<br />
Jan Apelqvist<br />
66 <strong>EWMA</strong> focus on multidisciplinarity in wound management<br />
Jan Apelqvist<br />
68 <strong>EWMA</strong> participation in EU Conference on Antimicrobials<br />
Resistance – it’s time to take joint action!<br />
Rytis Rimdeika<br />
70 Eucomed, Woundcare reflections on the EU 2020 strategy<br />
Hans Lundgren<br />
Organisations<br />
72 <strong>EWMA</strong> Corporate Sponsors<br />
73 Conference Calendar<br />
74 10th DFCon Global Diabetic Foot Conference.<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> President Jan Apelqvist receives Diabetic Foot Award.<br />
Diabetic Foot Experts Attend Global Meeting to Share Ideas<br />
on Amputation Prevention<br />
75 AAWC, The Association for the Advancement of<br />
Wound Care<br />
Terry Treadwell<br />
76 AWMA, The Australian Wound Management Association<br />
national conference<br />
Bill McGuiness<br />
78 DEBRA International<br />
John Dart<br />
80 EPUAP, News from the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory<br />
Panel – Latin American Activities on Prevention of Pressure<br />
Ulcers<br />
Michael Clark<br />
82 <strong>EWMA</strong> Cooperating Organisations<br />
ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENT<br />
<strong>May</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
The <strong>May</strong> <strong>2012</strong> edition of the <strong>EWMA</strong> Journal<br />
Electronic Supplement consist<br />
of all the accepted abstracts for the <strong>EWMA</strong><br />
<strong>2012</strong> Conference in Vienna.<br />
It is divided into Oral presentations<br />
and Poster presentations and it<br />
is possible to download individual<br />
abstracts as well as the entire supplement<br />
(including all the abstracts) at<br />
www.ewma.org/english/ewma-journal/<br />
electronic-supplement.html<br />
WWW.<strong>EWMA</strong>.ORG<br />
3
Customised V.A.C. ®<br />
Therapy,<br />
for fewer blocks to wound healing.<br />
No two wounds are alike, so treatment options require maximum flexibility. Introducing V.A.C. VeraFlo Therapy,<br />
a customized approach to wound healing, now available with the new V.A.C.Ulta System. V.A.C. VeraFlo Therapy<br />
unites proven V.A.C. ® Therapy power with automated distribution and removal of wound irrigation solutions,<br />
addressing a variety of wound types. Together with specialized wound dressings and a<br />
streamlined user experience, it all combines to help remove the blocks to wound healing.<br />
Note: Specific indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions and safety information exist for KCI products and therapies.<br />
Please consult a physician and product instructions for use prior to application.<br />
©2010 KCI Licensing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. The MEGA BLOKS blocks are used with the permission of MEGA Brands Inc. All other trademarks are proprietary<br />
to KCI Licensing, Inc., its affiliates and/or licensors. This material intended for healthcare professionals. DSL#10-0299.EMEA (Rev. 2/12)
It is a great pleasure for me to introduce the<br />
theme of this issue of the <strong>EWMA</strong> Journal:<br />
The diabetic foot. This is not only because<br />
it is my area of expertise but also because it<br />
gives <strong>EWMA</strong> an opportunity to highlight<br />
some of the many important activities that<br />
have been initiated by the diabetic foot<br />
organisations in Europe and internationally,<br />
as well as the activities that <strong>EWMA</strong> is<br />
currently supporting.<br />
The diabetic foot will also be covered<br />
thoroughly during the <strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2012</strong> Conference<br />
in Vienna. In addition to a key<br />
session on the diabetic foot, an Austrian<br />
Diabetic Foot Symposium will be held on<br />
Thursday <strong>24</strong> <strong>May</strong>. The symposium is<br />
arranged in collaboration with AWA 1 ,<br />
DFSG 1 and IWGDF 1 and will focus on<br />
implementation of the IWGDF guidelines<br />
on management of the diabetic foot and<br />
offer international examples of the organisation<br />
of treatment.<br />
The diabetic foot counts for a substantial<br />
number of hard to heal ulcers treated in primary<br />
and secondary care settings throughout<br />
the world. Due to the high risk of amputations,<br />
long healing rates and risk of adverse<br />
Editorial<br />
1 Austrian Wound Association (AWA), Diabetic Foot Study Group (DFSG) and The International Working Group<br />
on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF)<br />
2 Apelqvist, J, Larsson, J: What is the most effective way to reduce incidence of amputation in the diabetic foot?,<br />
Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews, Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2000; 16 (Suppl 1); pp. 75-S83<br />
3 Driver Vickie R, Fabbi M, Lavery L A, Gibbons G: The cost of diabetic foot: The economic case for the limb<br />
salvage team, Journal of vascular surgery, September Supplement 2010<br />
events, treatment of the diabetic foot is a<br />
costly process which calls for involvement of<br />
many different disciplines and care settings<br />
2,3 . Without a well defined organisation<br />
of treatment, patients are often lost in the<br />
system. These challenges are similar with<br />
regards to all patients suffering from hard to<br />
heal ulcers.<br />
Thus the diabetic foot case illustrates the<br />
general need for interdisciplinary care as well<br />
as the need for a fundamental change in the<br />
health care system with regards to health<br />
economics and reimbursement strategies.<br />
In this issue of the <strong>EWMA</strong> Journal you will<br />
find two scientific articles on treatment of<br />
the diabetic foot as well as a background article<br />
on the effect of interdisciplinary teams on<br />
patient outcomes in diabetic foot ulceration.<br />
Throughout the journal you will also find<br />
information about different initiatives<br />
aiming to support improved prevention and<br />
treatment of the diabetic foot.<br />
We hope you will enjoy reading this issue.<br />
Jan Apelqvist, <strong>EWMA</strong> President<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 5
ETHICAL<br />
COLLABORATION<br />
IN HEALTHCARE<br />
CERTIFIED<br />
Licensed by Eucomed
A structured approach to<br />
surgical treatment in deep<br />
infection in diabetic foot<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Background: It is generally acknowledged that<br />
chronic wounds can take months or years to heal.<br />
Patients often need to undergo many therapeutic<br />
procedures to support and promote the best environment<br />
for healing, including the prevention<br />
and early treatment of bacterial load and infection.<br />
This is especially pertinent to the management<br />
of patients with diabetic foot ulceration,<br />
who are prone to osteomyelitis as the most common<br />
complication.<br />
Aim: The aim of this study is to test a surgical protocol<br />
applied in the treatment of bone infection<br />
and chronic wounds related to bone infection.<br />
Methods: In management of ulcers IIIV level,<br />
Wagner classification, surgical treatment was applied.<br />
Surgical debridement and softtissue reconstruction<br />
were carried out.<br />
Results: Surgical treatment included 23 patients<br />
with ulcers. Ulcers were classified according the<br />
Wagner classification as level III 8 (34.5%),<br />
level IV 8 (34.5%) and level V 7 (30.4%). Surgical<br />
treatment included: surgical debridement<br />
23 patients (100%), bone resection 11 patients<br />
(47.8%), disarticulation 2 patients (8.7%), perfusion<br />
2 patients (8.7%), antibiotic instillation 3<br />
patients (13%), suture or approximation of the<br />
wound border lines 14 patients (60.9%). Duration<br />
of the treatment after operation until the<br />
wound healing and the end of the secernation<br />
were reached was overall 7.5 weeks (216 weeks).<br />
Conclusion: Surgical treatment includes the exploration<br />
of the changed bone and minimal resection<br />
which spares the bone. It is advisable to<br />
undertake surgical treatment without delay and<br />
additional diagnostic procedures. Surgical treatment,<br />
followed by local and systemic application<br />
of antibiotics, achieves shorter healing time and<br />
more successful patient outcomes.<br />
Key words: chronic wounds, osteomyelitis, diabetic<br />
foot ulcers, local antibiotics<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
It is generally acknowledged that chronic wounds<br />
can take months or years to heal. Patients often<br />
need to undergo many therapeutic procedures<br />
to support and promote the best environment<br />
for healing, including the prevention and early<br />
treatment of bacterial load and infection. This is<br />
especially pertinent to the management of patients<br />
with diabetic foot ulceration, who are prone to<br />
osteomyelitis as the most common complication.<br />
Chronic wounds have been defined as having<br />
multiple physiological impairments to healing,<br />
including: inadequate angiogenesis, impaired<br />
innervation, direct pressure, microcirculatory<br />
ischemia and impaired cellular migration, all of<br />
which may contribute to extensive morbidity 1 .<br />
The therapeutic possibilities are huge, often with<br />
big limitations and also including the amputation<br />
surgery. Chronic bone and joint infection is<br />
followed by appearance of fistulas, skin defects,<br />
metaplasia, and sometimes by malignant alteration,<br />
permanent or periodical secretion. Bone and<br />
joint infection appearance on the skin cannot be<br />
treated separately from general treatment of bone<br />
and joint infection (fig.1, 2, 3). Current treatment<br />
options for diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) include offloading<br />
to reduce pressure on the wound, wound<br />
care to prevent infections, and wound debridement<br />
to remove necrotic debris and restimulate<br />
the wound healing process 2 .<br />
Approximately 22.5% of patients with diabetes<br />
mellitus have complication on their feet 3,2 .<br />
If there are infected ulcers on feet, the level of<br />
osteomyelitis is high, 66% 4 . Among outpatients<br />
with diabetic foot the level of osteomyelitis appearance<br />
is 1020% 5,6 .<br />
Diabetic foot ulcrs have osteomyelitis as the<br />
most common complication. It is also possible<br />
that osteomyelitis appears as a complication in soft<br />
tissue infection without the initial ulcers. Reduced<br />
circulation, tissue trophic and neuropathy result<br />
�<br />
Science, Practice and Education<br />
1,2 Cedomir S Vucetic,<br />
MD PhD<br />
3Javorka B Delic, MD,<br />
2,4Zoran S Vukasinovic,<br />
MD PhD,<br />
1,2 Goran Dz Tulic,<br />
MD PhD,<br />
2,5 Ivan K Dimitrijevic,<br />
MD PhD,<br />
1Cedo Dj Vuckovic,<br />
MD PhD<br />
2,6 Vesna K Kalezic,<br />
MD PhD<br />
1 Institute for Orthopaedic<br />
Surgery and Traumatology,<br />
Clinical Center of Serbia,<br />
Belgrade<br />
2 School of Medicine,<br />
University of Belgrade,<br />
Belgrade, Serbia<br />
3 Institute for Dermato-<br />
Venereal Diseases,<br />
Belgrade<br />
4 Institute of Orthopaedic<br />
Surgery Banjica, Belgrade<br />
5 Clinic for Psychiatry,<br />
Clinical Center of Serbia,<br />
Belgrade<br />
6 Clinic for endocrinology,<br />
diabetes and metabolic<br />
diseases, Clinical Center of<br />
Serbia, Belgrade<br />
Correspondence:<br />
cedomir.vucetic@<br />
gmail.com<br />
Conflict of interest: none<br />
Acknowledgement<br />
This work is supported by<br />
grant number III 41004,<br />
Ministry of Education and<br />
Science Republic of Serbia.<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 7
in the foot being vulnerable to infection. The early detection<br />
of the clinical signs of infection in the diabetic foot<br />
includes the evaluation of the foot for bone infection. The<br />
possibility of bone infection is significantly greater if there<br />
is a several weeks’ presence of soft tissue infection or fistula.<br />
Plain film radiography of the foot can usually show the<br />
bone exposure and signs of osteomyelitis. Primary phase<br />
or acute state can show bone demineralisation, diffuse<br />
lytic changes on the bone, localised circular changes or<br />
confluent changes, with or without sclerotic parts of the<br />
bone. Chronic osteomyelitis form comes with sequestra<br />
and with more expressive sclerotic and osteolitic parts of<br />
the bone. There are several clinical signs of osteomyelitis:<br />
swelling and the ’sausage’ look of the finger; probetobone<br />
test; deep ulcer.<br />
Laboratory indicators of infection are higher sedimentation<br />
of erythrocytes (SE), higher number of leukocytes,<br />
Creactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin, bacteriological<br />
smear examination, bone biopsy for bacteriological<br />
and histological examination, repeated radiographic examination,<br />
bone scintigraphy ( 99m Tc diphosphonate),<br />
labelled autologous leucocyte scanning ( 111 In oxine or<br />
99m TcHMPAO), antigranulocyte scintigraphy (AGS),<br />
computed tomographic (CT), and magnetic resonance<br />
imaging (MRI) 3,7,8 .<br />
Therapeutic strategies:<br />
Literature describes various approaches to osteomyelitis<br />
healing in diabetic foot. Surgical exploration of infected<br />
part of the bone and bone resection until reaching the<br />
healthy part are marked as the traditional surgical approach.<br />
The advantages of this surgical approach are radically<br />
removing the bone changed by infection and faster<br />
healing. The disadvantages are more bone removed than<br />
necessary, possible disturbance of the foot biomechanics,<br />
and greater surgical procedure.<br />
Conservative surgery in osteomyelitis healing in diabetic<br />
foot is an approach in which only the sequestra are<br />
removed with very limited bone removal. The advantage<br />
of this kind of healing is greater savings but the risk is<br />
longer healing times.<br />
Healing supported by the use of dressings and followed<br />
by systemic antibiotic therapy, can achieve the wanted<br />
result of healing even in 85% of osteomyelitis. Healing<br />
by antibiotics alone prolongs healing time to/by 12<strong>24</strong><br />
weeks 3 .<br />
AIM:<br />
The aim of this study is to evaluate the surgical protocol<br />
applied in treatment of bone infection and chronic<br />
wounds, which are related to bone infection in the treatment<br />
of diabetic foot ulcers.<br />
8<br />
a b<br />
c<br />
e<br />
g<br />
Figure 1:<br />
1a. Female, 44 years, osteomyelitis, phalange distal et proximal<br />
big toe, fistula of the dorsum;<br />
1b. Plantar ulcer, purulent secernation seven months<br />
1c, d. Rtg. pre-operative joint subluxation interphalangeal<br />
1e, f. Operative exploration, sequestrectomy, fistula excision,<br />
sutural, continual lavage<br />
1g, h, Condition 2 months post-operatively<br />
Description of the surgical protocol:<br />
Surgical protocol applied in this study included: 1. surgical<br />
debridement, 2. reconstruction, with the aim of closing<br />
the operative wound as much as possible, 3. application<br />
of antibiotics locally, and 4. surgical procedures of wound<br />
covering with the transplantates or with local flap applied<br />
when needed,. Surgical debridement included: exploration<br />
of the part affected by infection; debridement of devitalised<br />
tissues, sequestra and infected joints and bones. Reconstruction<br />
with the aim of closing the operative wound<br />
was also part of the surgical plan, as much as it was possible.<br />
Local application of antibiotics was enabled by setting<br />
the catheter for continual instillation of antibiotics.<br />
If it was possible, the drain was also set. The additional<br />
procedure of skin defect covering was applied if there was<br />
a need for it after the resolution of infection.<br />
d<br />
f<br />
h<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2
a<br />
c<br />
Figure 2:<br />
2a. Male, 67 years. Condition after the amputation of<br />
IV finger and resection of the V MT bone<br />
2b. Rtg after the second operation resection of IV and<br />
V MT bone<br />
2c. condition one week after the operation, debridement<br />
and approximation of wound’s lines with local instillation of<br />
antibiotics<br />
2d. condition 5 weeks after the operation<br />
METHODS<br />
Ulcers on diabetic foot level IIIV, according to Wagner,<br />
were surgically treated. The applied osteomyelitis treatment<br />
at diabetic foot is the synthesis of surgical treatment<br />
which intends to save as much as possible while carrying<br />
out necessary debridement and providing the necessary<br />
conditions for wound healing. Practically, that meant the<br />
use of minimally invasive surgery, which included debri<br />
Table 1. Infection clasification in diabetic according the intensity and form criteria<br />
Acute infection<br />
Chronic infection<br />
Low intensity it appears suddenly,<br />
looks like basical ulcer with<br />
after the minor injury,<br />
smaller secernation, without typical<br />
only some signs of inflammation clinical signs of infection, long lasting,<br />
smaller secernation<br />
can be treated non-operatively<br />
High intensity febrility, sepsis, colour and without local swelling and colour,<br />
swelling of entire foot,<br />
with ulcer or fistula with great<br />
abscess or present secernation,<br />
often skin necrosis<br />
purulent secernation.<br />
b<br />
d<br />
Science, Practice and Education<br />
dement and softtissue reconstruction. When there were<br />
clinical signs of infection and ulcers which reached the<br />
fasciae and tendons with secernation, these demanded use<br />
of incision, necrectomy, detritus debridement and possible<br />
exploration. If there was no rapid calming of clinical<br />
signs of infection during the first week of the treatment,<br />
or if there was clinically obvious infection of a chronic<br />
nature, clinical exploration with sparing removing of infected<br />
part of the bone and softtissue reconstruction was<br />
done (fig.2). In cases of chronic forms of osteomyelitis<br />
after the resection of part of the bone or after the debridement,<br />
we applied perfusion drainage or local instillation<br />
of antibiotics (fig.1e, 2c). The antibiotics were given locally<br />
for not more than two weeks, followed by parenteral<br />
systemic antibiotic therapy for 26 weeks. Osteomyelitis<br />
with smaller ulcers can be healed in two weeks. When<br />
there is also a skin defect, it is often necessary to carry out<br />
the additional skin transplant. In diabetic foot, we can see<br />
a difference between chronic and acute infection and also<br />
a difference in intensity between the lowintensive infection<br />
and highintensive infection (tempestuous reaction).<br />
Acute infection appears suddenly, after a minor injury<br />
or without a noticeable injury. Locally, only some signs<br />
of inflammation can be noticed, swelling, pain, colour,<br />
induration, with or without recurrence. Acute infection<br />
can be of lowintensity, when there is a clinical presence of<br />
local changes, but without noticeable significant systemic<br />
changes. Acute infection of highintensity is followed by<br />
tempestuous local changes and systemic response (febricity,<br />
sepsis). Local changes are colour and swelling of entire<br />
foot, secernation or present abscess, and often also skin<br />
necrosis. It is possible that infection develops fast over several<br />
hours or days. Chronic infection of lowintensity looks<br />
like a typical ulcer with smaller secernation, but without<br />
the usual clinical signs of infection; it is longlasting and<br />
can be treated nonoperatively. Chronic infection of high<br />
intensity can turn over to the acute form and vice versa,<br />
just as the infection of lowintensity can have the characteristics<br />
of highintensity infection and vice versa, too<br />
(table 1).<br />
Selecting patients for the study:<br />
The inclusion criteria were: diabetes mellitus type 1 and<br />
2; patient’s ageover 18, foot ulcers level III, IV and V;<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 9<br />
�
treatment which includes surgical procedures, positive<br />
smear of the wound.<br />
The exclusion criteria were: inflammatory changes with<br />
necrosis or foot gangrene, which were the indication for<br />
belowknee amputation. The diagnosis of bone infection<br />
was based on clinical findings, radiographic changes on<br />
bones and microbiological findings of bones and tissue<br />
from the operating room. The indication for surgical<br />
treatment was based on clinical findings, the duration of<br />
ulceration and failure of previous treatment, operative or<br />
nonoperative.<br />
RESULTS<br />
In the study 23 patients were selected – 23 patients with<br />
ulcers, which were surgically treated. Of the patients, 19<br />
were male (82.6%) and four were female (17.4%). The<br />
average age was 55 years and the age range included patients<br />
aged 4478. Ulcers were classified according to the<br />
Wagner classification as level III eight patients (34.5%),<br />
level IV eight patients (34.5%) and level V seven patients<br />
(30.4%). The clinical classification of the wounds showed<br />
there were 20 patients with chronic wounds (87%), 15<br />
with lowintensity infection (65.2%) and five with highintensity<br />
infection (21.7). There were three patients (13%)<br />
with acute wounds, one with lowintensity (4.4%) and two<br />
with highintensity (8.7%). Surgical treatment included:<br />
surgical debridement 23, bone resections 11 (47.8%), disarticulation<br />
two (8.7%), perfusion two (8.7%), instillation<br />
of antibiotics three (13%), and suture or aproximation of<br />
wound’s border lines 14 (60.9%). Additional comorbidity,<br />
which may cause changes on foot or which may have<br />
influence on present changes on foot, was recorded in eight<br />
patients (34.8%), two with terminal renal insufficiency<br />
(8.7%), three with neuropathic changes Scharcot (13%)<br />
and one with pes excavatus (4.4%). Healing duration after<br />
the operation until the wound healing and the end of<br />
wound secretion was on average 7.5 weeks, (216 weeks).<br />
Wound healing and bone infection cleansing seem to have<br />
an improved outcome.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
Surgical technique in diabetic foot has some characteristics,<br />
which should be considered. Generally, surgical interventions<br />
on foot should be done in the operating room,<br />
just as every other type of bone surgery. Incisions, smaller<br />
debridements and necrectomies could be done as smaller<br />
surgical procedures. During the surgical exploration, the<br />
soft tissue should not be divided and, generally, every manipulation<br />
should be very sparing, so the vascularisation<br />
can be saved. During the debridement, the incision should<br />
follow the demarcation line, avoiding bleeding as much as<br />
possible. When the wound is closing, no kind of tension is<br />
10<br />
a b<br />
c d<br />
Figure 3:<br />
3a. female, 54 years, osteomyelitis phalanges medialis<br />
et proximalis, dig.II ulceratio four months<br />
3b. Rtg, inter-phalangeal joint subluxation<br />
3c. operation: resection of proximal inter-phalangeal joint,<br />
debridemant, sutural, fixation with filli-K.<br />
3d. condition 4 weeks after the operation<br />
allowed. If there is no skin defect, the wound lines should<br />
be approximated. The flaps, which are formed, must have<br />
very wide basis. It is also important to consider whether<br />
wound drainage is necessary.<br />
Therapeutic approach in diabetic foot includes surgery,<br />
if there is a presence of ulcers and radiographic changes<br />
on bones (fig.1c, 2b, 3b). The chronic ulcers with changes<br />
on bones and joints can be persistent because of the bone<br />
infection or because of the pressure of the fragments, or<br />
both. These three situations need surgery as active therapy.<br />
Surgical treatment should include the resection of the part<br />
of the bone, which is infected or which protrudes out and<br />
presses the skin (fig.3). Surgical debridement and resection<br />
of part of the bone very often can enable the primary<br />
wound to close or make conditions better for surgical reconstruction<br />
of softtissues (fig.2).<br />
We based the diagnosis of bone infection on clinical<br />
findings, radiographic changes on bones and microbiological<br />
findings of bones and tissue from the operating room.<br />
We based the indication for surgical treatment on clinical<br />
findings, the duration of ulceration and failure of previous<br />
treatment, operative or nonoperative. This study showed<br />
that the applied procedure shortens the healing, avoids<br />
complications, often results in a smaller scar, prevents the<br />
recurrence and often corrects the inadequate anatomical<br />
relation. This procedure also means more radical treat<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2
ment, a larger procedure for the surgeon and also for the<br />
patient. Sometimes it is also necessary to repeat the surgical<br />
treatment. A large study reporting the surgical experience<br />
is needed to appraise the structured approach suggested in<br />
this study. Observations we have made in this series match<br />
the findings of other authors; after surgical treatment for<br />
osteomyelitis, low rate of recurrence was achieved 9 ; early<br />
and aggressive soft tissue reconstruction is in the patient’s<br />
best interest and is crucial for resolution of the chronic<br />
nonhealing wound 10 . Diabetic foot infections are a major<br />
cause of morbidity. Infection is the common sequel<br />
of diabetic foot ulceration that leads to delayed wound<br />
healing 11 . We believe that bone biopsy remains the gold<br />
standard for the detection of osteomyelitis 1215 . Realising<br />
that deep ulcers with detritus and secretion should<br />
be surgically treated, our opinion is that exploration and<br />
debridement should be done according to the clinical<br />
findings, even without the former confirmation of osteomyelitis<br />
diagnosis. It is best to take the bone tissue for<br />
histopathological and microbiological examination during<br />
the surgical treatment. This is important because there<br />
are recommendations which say that surgical percutaneous<br />
bone biopsy specimen after a 14day antibioticfree<br />
period represents the gold standard of care for diabetic foot<br />
osteomyelitis 14 . It is known that infection is the cause of<br />
great complications major amputations are thought to<br />
be primarily due to arterial inflow and minor due to bone<br />
infection 1 . Radiology data revealed that 55% of the amputated<br />
limbs showed the presence of osteomyelitis compared<br />
with 38% of the limbs of nonamputees (p=0.39) 1 .<br />
Osteomyelitis may underlie a diabetic ulcer and is often<br />
treated by resection of the infected bone and always by<br />
antibiotics, the mode and length of treatment depending<br />
on the adequacy of the debridement 16 . Considering that<br />
the surgical treatment is a must when there is a serious<br />
infection, necrosis, and longtermed secretion, it should<br />
not be delayed. On the contrary, surgical treatment should<br />
be used to enable 1 – the more complete exploration, 2<br />
– debridement, 3 – taking the tissue samples for HP and<br />
microbiological examination, 4 – local antibiotic application<br />
and 5 – reconstruction of the soft tissue covering on<br />
foot. The findings of other authors can be the confirmation<br />
for this. Debridement is indicated when necrotic tissue<br />
is present. Topical antibiotics should be considered if<br />
there is no improvement in healing after 14 days. Systemic<br />
antibiotics are used in patients with advancing cellulitis,<br />
osteomyelitis, or systemic infection 17 . Ray resection technique<br />
is recommended for localized necrosis, infection,<br />
and osteomyelitis and is an accepted procedure allowing<br />
removal of the diseased toe and metatarsal and limits softtissue<br />
dissection. Defects from the toe amputation can<br />
be primarily closed, covered with a splitthickness skin<br />
graft, or closed in delayed primary fashion with the use of<br />
a miniexternal fixation device 18 . The observed group of<br />
Science, Practice and Education<br />
patients with ulcers and bone infection, which was surgically<br />
treated, had shown a significantly shorter period of<br />
healing. Diabetic motor neuropathy is expressed as the loss<br />
of function and the contracting of the intrinsic muscles<br />
of the foot, leading to the classic claw toe deformity. The<br />
mean wound healing time was 25.6 +/ 6.2 days resection<br />
arthroplasty for toe deformities with chronic infected<br />
ulcers in diabetic patients is a good alternative treatment<br />
to toe amputation 19 . Prolonged time of healing has been<br />
described in chronic wounds. That some parameters can<br />
also show 50% reduction in the wound area at four weeks<br />
after treatment is a reliable indicator of healing 1 .<br />
The application of the simple clinical evaluation of the<br />
presence of bone infection may also be of interest to other<br />
authors, as may the active surgical approach with tissue<br />
reconstruction after the sanation of the infection. Simple<br />
clinical evaluation and laboratory findings without using<br />
expensive imaging methods may be important indicators<br />
of osteomyelitis 1 ESR > or =65 mm/h together with<br />
a wound size > or =2 cm and also a sensitivity of 83%,<br />
specificity of 77%, and positive predictive value of 80% 20 .<br />
Osteomyelitis affects up to 32% of fullthickness<br />
pressure ulcers. Seven steps in this structured approach<br />
of care include: 1. acknowledgment of osteomyelitis risk<br />
in patients with Stage IV pressure ulcers, 2. clinical evaluation<br />
for local or systemic signs of infection upon initial<br />
presentation, 3. radiographic evaluation, 4. surgical debridement<br />
to remove all nonviable tissue and/or scarred<br />
and infected bone, 5. obtaining pathology reports from<br />
sterile bone biopsy and deep microbial cultures, 6. targeted<br />
systemic antimicrobial therapy, and 7. tissue reconstruction<br />
following resolution of infection 21 . Experiences with<br />
local application of antibiotics surgical debridement, implantation<br />
of gentamicin polymethylmethacrylate beads<br />
and longterm intravenous antibiotics show the certain<br />
advantage of this kind of healing. In the instillation group<br />
the rate of recurrence of infection was just 10%, whereas<br />
it was 58.5% in the control group 22 .<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
The results of surgical treatment on diabetic foot, type<br />
Wagner IIIV with bone infection, show significantly<br />
shorter duration. The applied surgical treatment includes:<br />
1. choosing the patients by clinical findings, laboratory<br />
parameters, inflammation and radiographies;<br />
2. surgical debridement with sparing resection of modified<br />
bone;<br />
3. local application of antibiotics at chronic infection<br />
and higherintensity infection,<br />
4. intention for carrying out the approximation of<br />
wound borderlines and reconstruction of the softtissue<br />
defect;<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 11<br />
�
Science, Practice and Education<br />
5. local application of antibiotics no longer than two<br />
weeks and parentelal application no longer than six<br />
weeks,<br />
6. the use of general methods of healing the complications<br />
of diabetic foot; relief and metabolic balance.<br />
Surgical treatment includes exploration of the exposed<br />
bone and sparing resection. It is better to do the surgical<br />
treatment without delay and additional diagnostic procedures.<br />
Surgical treatment, with local and systemic antibiotic<br />
application achieves shorter and more successful<br />
healing. Earlier treatment of diabetic foot ulcers which<br />
have lasted for several months or even several years can<br />
be ended in few weeks. m<br />
Reference:<br />
1. Glinka MS, Margolis DJ, Tal A, Hoff tad O, Boulton AJM, Brem H. Preliminary<br />
development of a diabetic foot ulcer database from a wound electronic medical<br />
record: A tool to decrease limb amputations. Wound Repair Regen. 2009 Sep–Oct;<br />
17(5): 657–665. doi: 10.1111/j.15<strong>24</strong>-475X.2009.00527.x PMCID: PMC2835515<br />
2. Nouvong A, Hoogwerf B, Mohler E, Davis B, Tajaddini A, Medenilla E. Evaluation of<br />
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing With Hyperspectral Imaging of Oxyhaemoglobin and<br />
Deoxyhaemoglobin Diabetes Care. 2009 November; 32(11): 2056–2061. doi:<br />
10.2337/dc08-2<strong>24</strong>6<br />
3. Hartemann-Heurtier A. Senneville E. Diabetic foot osteomyelitis. Diabetes &<br />
Metabolism 34 (2008) 87-95.<br />
4. Grayon ML, Gibbons GW, Balogh K, Levin E, Karchmer AW. Probing to bone in<br />
infected pedal ulcers. A clinical sign of underlying osteomyelitis in diabetic patients.<br />
JAMA 1995;273:721-3.<br />
5. Shone A, Burnside J, Chipchase S, Game F, Jeffcoate W. Probing the validity of the<br />
probe-to-bone test in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis of the foot in diabetes. Diabetes<br />
care (letter) 2006;29:945.<br />
6. Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Peters EJ, Lipsky BA, Probe-to-bone test for diagnosing<br />
diabetic foot osteomyelitis: reliable or relic? Diabetes care 2007;30:270-4.<br />
As a member of <strong>EWMA</strong>, you need access to the<br />
latest international developments in wound<br />
management and prevention.<br />
Journal of Wound Care is a leading international<br />
MEDLINE-listed wound care journal, with a loyal<br />
global audience and contributors from every<br />
continent. Every month, JWC provides a truly<br />
global perspective on wound care, from the latest<br />
in evidence-based practice to cutting-edge research<br />
from the US, Europe and elsewhere.<br />
JWC is read by a wide audience, including doctors,<br />
nurses, podiatrists, physiotherapists and occupational<br />
therapists involved in wound care.<br />
SUBSCRIBE TODAY<br />
and receive special rates online by visiting<br />
www.journalofwoundcare.com/<strong>EWMA</strong><br />
7. Jeff G. van Baal. Surgical treatment of the infected diabetic foot. CID 2004;39<br />
S123-9<br />
8. Robinson AHN, Paspula C. Brodsky JW. Surgical aspects of the diabetic foot. JBJS Br<br />
2009;91-B 1-8.<br />
9. Sánchez JA, Martínez JLL, Herrero CH, Vilorio NC, Marrero YQ, Morales EG,<br />
Herrero MJH. Does osteomyelitis in the feet of patients with diabetes really recur<br />
after surgical treatment? Natural history of a surgical series. Diabet Med. 2011 Dec<br />
8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03528.x.<br />
10. Capobianco CM, Stapleton JJ, Zgonis T. Soft tissue reconstruction pyramid in the<br />
diabetic foot. Foot Ankle Spec. 2010 Oct;3(5):<strong>24</strong>1-8. Epub 2010 Jul 7.<br />
11. Nagoba BS, Gandhi RC, Wadher BJ, Rao A, Hartalkar AR, Selkar SP. A simple and<br />
effective approach for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers with different Wagner<br />
grades. Int Wound J. 2010 Jun;7(3):153-8. Epub 2010 Apr 23.<br />
12. Miller AO, Henry M. Update in diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections.<br />
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2009 Nov;20(4):611-25.<br />
13. Lipsky AB.Medical treatment of diabetic foot infections.CID 2004;39:S 104-14.<br />
14. Lesens O, Desbiez F, Vidal M, Robin F, Descamps S, Beytout J, Laurichesse H,<br />
Tauveron I. Culture of per-wound bone specimens: a simplified approach for the<br />
medical management of diabetic foot osteomyelitis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011<br />
Feb;17(2):285-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03194.x.<br />
15. Iori I, Pizzini AM, Arioli D, Favali D, Leone MC. Infected pressure ulcers: evaluation<br />
and management. Infez Med. 2009 Sep;17 Suppl 4:88-94.<br />
16. Vuorisalo S, Venermo M, Lepäntalo M.Treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. J Cardiovasc<br />
Surg (Torino). 2009 Jun;50(3):275-91.<br />
17. Bluestein D, Javaheri A. Pressure ulcers: prevention, evaluation, and management.<br />
Am Fam Physician. 2008 Nov 15;78(10):1186-94. Minimum-incision ray resection.<br />
Oznur A, Roukis TS. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2008 Oct;25(4):609-22.<br />
18. Oznur A, Roukis TS. Minimum-incision ray resection. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2008<br />
Oct;25(4):609-22.<br />
19. Kim JY, Kim TW, Park YE, Lee YJ. Modified resection arthroplasty for infected<br />
non-healing ulcers with toe deformity in diabetic patients. Foot Ankle Int. 2008<br />
<strong>May</strong>;29(5):493-7.<br />
20. Ertugrul BM, Savk O, Ozturk B, Cobanoglu M, Oncu S, Sakarya S. The diagnosis of<br />
diabetic foot osteomyelitis: examination findings and laboratory values. Med Sci<br />
Monit. 2009 Jun;15(6):CR307-12.<br />
21. Rennert R, Golinko M, Yan A, Flattau A, Tomic-Canic M, Brem H. Developing and<br />
evaluating outcomes of an evidence-based protocol for the treatment of osteomyelitis<br />
in Stage IV pressure ulcers: a literature and wound electronic medical record<br />
database review. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2009 Mar;55(3):42-5.<br />
22. Timmers MS, Graafland N, Bernards AT, Nelissen RG, van Dissel JT, Jukema GN.<br />
Negative pressure wound treatment with polyvinyl alcohol foam and polyhexanide<br />
antiseptic solution instillation in posttraumatic osteomyelitis. Wound Repair Regen.<br />
2009 Mar-Apr;17(2):278-86.<br />
j o u rnal of w o u nd ca r e W C<br />
v o l u m e 2 0 . n u m b e r 1 1 . n o v e m b e r 2 0 1 1<br />
?<br />
?<br />
?<br />
j o u rnal r rnal<br />
l of f w o u nd d ca r e W C<br />
v o l u m e 2 0 . n u m b e r 1 0 . o c t o b e r 2 0 1 1<br />
?<br />
?<br />
?<br />
j o u rnal of w o u nd ca r e W C<br />
?<br />
?<br />
?<br />
C<br />
C<br />
The patient experience of complex wounds<br />
treated with NPWT<br />
Ultrasound assessment of necrotic tissue in pressure ulcers with undermining<br />
Chronic plantar ulcer secondary to congenital indifference to pain<br />
Manuka honey as an effective treatment for chronic pilonidal sinus wounds<br />
Silver and nanoparticles of silver in wound dressings<br />
Efficacy of a PHMB-containing biocellulose dressing in the treatment of biofilms<br />
C<br />
Quantitative estimation of exudate volume<br />
for full-thickness pressure ulcers<br />
v o l u m e 2 0 . n u m b e r 9 . s e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 1<br />
A proposed method of evaluating orbital exenteration wounds<br />
Modelling the cost-effectiveness of bioelectric stimulation therapy in chronic VLUs<br />
The effect of temperature and Evaluation humidity on the permeability of the of skin film dressings stripping of wound<br />
Complex lower extremity wounds treated with skin grafts and NPWT dressing adhesives<br />
The effect of simulated leg-length discrepancy on plantar pressure distribution<br />
Wound healing through synergy of hyaluronan and an iodine complex<br />
Innovation in tissue viability documentation for acute services<br />
Necrosis in breast cancer patients with skin metastases receiving bevacizumab<br />
JWC_20_11_cover.indd 1 03/11/2011 14:44<br />
VISIT NOW:<br />
www.journalofwoundcare.com/<strong>EWMA</strong><br />
JWC_20_10_cover.indd 1 04/10/2011 15:22
SYS/GLO/862/0412<br />
A chronic wound with EPA has a<br />
90% probability it won’t heal 1<br />
28% of non healing wounds have EPA 1<br />
There are no visual cues to detect EPA 2,3<br />
UNTIL NOW<br />
NOW YOU CAN DETECT EPA IN 15 MINUTES<br />
Come and see us at <strong>EWMA</strong> stand 35.<br />
Also, don’t miss out on our Symposium - Testing for EPA,<br />
The arrival of wound diagnostics - Thursday <strong>24</strong>th <strong>May</strong>, 16.00-17.00 Room E1.<br />
For more information, contact us on EPA@systagenix.com or visit our website<br />
www.systagenix.com<br />
References<br />
1. Serena T. et al. Protease activity levels associated with healing status of chronic wounds. Poster, Wounds UK 2011.<br />
2. Snyder R. et al. A survey: The importance of proteases in wound healing and wound assessment. Poster, Wounds UK 2011.<br />
3. International consensus. The role of proteases in wound diagnostics. An expert working group review. London: Wounds International, 2011.
Askina ® Calgitrol ® Paste<br />
A soft paste wound dressing containing 100% ionic silver:<br />
More intimate contact between the wound and active antimicrobial silver ions,<br />
particularly valuable in difficult to manage wounds.<br />
NEW<br />
■ Easy to apply on deep wounds and sinuses<br />
■ No activation needed<br />
■ Sustained controlled delivery of silver ions<br />
■ Antimicrobial efficacy against a broad spectrum of microorganisms, including MRSA<br />
■ Safe for use<br />
■ Non staining<br />
B. Braun Hospicare Ltd. | Collooney | Co. Sligo | Ireland<br />
www.bbraun.com | www.woundcare-bbraun.com
Presented at<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> 2011<br />
Brussels · Belgium<br />
Endothelial progenitor cells, a unipotent<br />
stem cell, involved in neovascularization<br />
of wound healing in diabetic foot ulcer<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Foot ulceration associated with diabetic complications<br />
is prevalent in patients with diabetes worldwide,<br />
leading to limb amputation. Reduction of<br />
peripheral blood flow and decrease in local neovascularization<br />
are critical factors contributing to<br />
slow healing or nonhealing wounds among these<br />
patients. Presumably, mature endothelial cells are<br />
regarded as the sole candidate for participation in<br />
angiogenesis in wound healing. In recent decades,<br />
endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) have been recognized<br />
and are being investigated as the main<br />
cellular effectors responsible for postnatal neovascularization<br />
and playing a vital role in wound<br />
healing. In this review, the role of EPCs involved<br />
in the neovascularization in wound healing will be<br />
evaluated. The process of EPCs from bone marrow<br />
to blood circulation requires a complex and<br />
sequential event including mobilization, homing,<br />
adhesion, transendothelial migration, differentiation<br />
and finally incorporation to newly formed<br />
blood vessels. However, deficiency of circulating<br />
EPCs and functional defects of EPCs have been<br />
reported in diabetes, which adversely affect interfering<br />
neovascularization of wound healing. Cellbased<br />
therapy using EPCs would be a promising<br />
therapeutic strategy for treating diabetic patients<br />
with nonhealing wound. Besides, the establishment<br />
of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) in<br />
treating diabetic foot ulcer may develop new perspectives<br />
of EPCs’ involvement in diabetic wound<br />
healing.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
According to the data provided by World Health<br />
Organization, about 346 million people worldwide<br />
have diabetes mellitus. The prevalence of<br />
diabetes has been increasing and represents a major<br />
health burden for the 21 st century. Diabetes<br />
mellitus is associated with various complications<br />
including cardiovascular disease, neuropathy,<br />
retinopathy, nephropathy and impaired wound<br />
healing in lower extremities. Annually about 1%<br />
to 4% of those with diabetes eventually develop a<br />
foot ulcer and the annual incidence of amputation<br />
is 0.211.37% [1] .<br />
The pathophysiology of diabetic foot ulcer and<br />
impaired wound healing has been well described.<br />
The factors of delayed wound healing are contributed<br />
to by progressive loss of sensory, motor<br />
and autonomic nervous system in diabetic patients<br />
leading to the loss of protective mechanisms<br />
upon injury in lower extremities. Development of<br />
peripheral vascular disease reduces the blood circulation<br />
to the dermal area, thus minimizing the<br />
supply of nutrients for normal wound repair [2] .<br />
Wound healing is a wellorchestrated, integrated<br />
and complex process that involves hemostasis,<br />
inflammation, angiogenesis and tissue<br />
granulation [3] . The coordination of multiple cells<br />
including platelet, monocytes, macrophages, lymphocytes,<br />
endothelial cells, fibroblasts and keratinocytes<br />
is essential for normal wound healing.<br />
However, the abnormal wound healing in diabetes<br />
is characterized by diminished level of growth<br />
factors, cytokines and chemokines; elevated inflammatory<br />
response with enhanced proliferation<br />
of inflammatory cells; inhibition in angiogenesis<br />
with decreased proliferation, migration and tube<br />
format<br />
Restoring the blood flow to the wound site<br />
is the prerequisite for successful wound healing.<br />
It is generally believed that neovascularization is<br />
solely aroused by the formation of new blood vessels<br />
from preexisting blood vessels (angiogenesis).<br />
Over the past decades, the emergence of EPCs has<br />
provided a new perspective in the involvement of<br />
postnatal vasculogenesis in neovascularization. In<br />
1997, Asahara et al. first isolated and identified<br />
circulating EPCs from human peripheral blood<br />
for postnatal neovascularization which is defined<br />
as the de novo formation of blood vessels with the<br />
recruitment and incorporation of EPCs. The findings<br />
showed that EPCs differentiated into mature<br />
endothelial cells in vitro and incorporated actively<br />
�<br />
Science, Practice and Education<br />
Jacqueline<br />
Chor Wing Tam 1,2<br />
Chun Hay Ko 1,2<br />
Ping Chung Leung 1,2<br />
Kwok Pui Fung 1,2,3<br />
Clara Bik San Lau 1,2,3<br />
1 Institute of Chinese<br />
Medicine,<br />
The Chinese University of<br />
Hong Kong, Shatin, New<br />
Territories, Hong Kong<br />
2 State Key Laboratory of<br />
Phytochemistry and Plant<br />
Resources in West China,<br />
The Chinese University of<br />
Hong Kong, Shatin,<br />
New Territories,<br />
Hong Kong<br />
3 School of Biomedical<br />
Sciences,<br />
The Chinese University of<br />
Hong Kong, Shatin,<br />
New Territories,<br />
Hong Kong<br />
Correspondence:<br />
claralau@cuhk.edu.hk<br />
Winner of the<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> 2011 First Time<br />
Presenters prize at<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> 2011<br />
conference in Bruxelles.<br />
Conflict of interest: none<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 15
1st International Course on<br />
The Neuropathic<br />
Osteoarthropathic Foot<br />
(Charcot)<br />
Advanced Postgraduate Course,<br />
Rheine, Germany<br />
15-17 November, <strong>2012</strong><br />
The international course will be based on the<br />
expertise gathered from 10 consecutive years of<br />
providing national courses on the Diabetic Foot.<br />
The main focus are practical sessions in small<br />
groups to train the diagnostic and treatment skills<br />
necessary for the interdisciplinary treatment of<br />
Charcot patients.<br />
The course will be held at the Mathias-Spital in<br />
Rheine.<br />
The courses are open to anyone involved in<br />
the treatment or management of Neuropathic<br />
Osteoarthropathic Foot patients.<br />
Number of participants: 25-50<br />
Language: English<br />
www.charcotfootcourses.org<br />
into sites of angiogenesis in ischemic animal models [5] .<br />
After that, a growing body has proposed that bone marrow<br />
(BM)derived EPCs can functionally participate in<br />
neovascularization in wound healing and limb ischemia [6,<br />
7] . It has been estimated that EPCs contribute up to 25%<br />
of endothelial cells of newly formed vessels in animal models<br />
[8] . Substantial evidence has demonstrated the role of<br />
BMderived EPCs in neovascularization [9,10,11] . In general,<br />
it is now well accepted that recruitment of EPCs in BM<br />
and the mature endothelial cells in preexisting blood vessels<br />
are essential in tissue vascularization in wound healing.<br />
ORIGIN OF EPCS<br />
EPCs are adult hemangioblastderived cells in BM. Immature<br />
stem cells originally exist in a quiescent state associated<br />
with BM stromal cells. Under specific stimulation<br />
and activation, stem cells will differentiate into EPCs<br />
preceding the mobilization of EPCs in peripheral blood<br />
for neovascularization. During their development, EPCs<br />
gradually lose stem cell characteristics and progressively<br />
gain mature endothelial cells characteristics.<br />
EPCS ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION<br />
Numerous methods have been adopted for the isolation<br />
of EPCs [12,13,14] . EPCs are often characterized by the<br />
combination of different cell surface markers, including<br />
CD34, CD133, CD146, platelet endothelial cell adhesion<br />
molecule1 (PECAM1), vascular endothelial cadherin<br />
(VEcadherin), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor<br />
2 (VEGFR2) and von Willebrand factor (vWF) [15,16] .<br />
However, there is no defined set of markers which can<br />
identify EPCs population uniquely. The reasons may be<br />
attributed to the various origins of EPCs precursors during<br />
extraction and isolation. The multiple precursors include<br />
haematopoietic stem cells, myeloid cells, multipotent BM<br />
progenitors or tissue resident stem cells. Moreover, EPCs<br />
may exist in different differentiation stage in the lineage<br />
References<br />
1. Bartus C.L., Margolis D.J. Reducing the incidence of foot ulceration and amputation<br />
in diabetes. Curr Diabetes Rep 2004: 4: 413-418.<br />
2. Bowering C.K. Diabetic foot ulcers: pathophysiology, assessment, and therapy. Can<br />
Fam Physician 2001: 47: 1007-1016.<br />
3. Diegelmann R.F., Evans M.C. Wound healing: an overview of acute, fibrotic and<br />
delayed wound healing. Front Biosci 2004: 9: 283-289.<br />
4. Brem H., Tomic-Canic M. Cellular and molecular basis of wound healing in<br />
diabetes. J Clin Invest 2007: 117: 1219-1222.<br />
5. Asahara T., Murohara T., Sullivan A., Silver M., Van Der Zee R., Li T., Witzenbichler<br />
B., Schatteman G., Isner J.M. Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for<br />
angiogenesis. Science 1997: 275: 964-967.<br />
6. Asahara T., Masuda H., Takahashi T., Kalka C., Pastore C., Silver M, Kearne M.,<br />
Magner M., Isner J.M. Bone marrow origin of endothelial progenitor cells responsible<br />
for postnatal vasculogenesis in physiological and pathological neovascularization.<br />
Circ Res 1999: 85: 221-228.<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2
of EPCs development. It is likely that various markers<br />
are present at EPCs at different points during their differentiation<br />
cascade from immature progenitors to mature<br />
endothelial cells. In line with this point of view, it<br />
has been suggested that EPCs can be divided into two<br />
distinct cell populations, which appear in cell culture sequentially.<br />
They are named early EPCs and late outgrowth<br />
EPCs (LOG EPCs). The technique to separate these two<br />
cell populations is according to their adherence ability<br />
in culture. Many studies demonstrated that only cells<br />
that adhere early in culture (within 48 hours) are early<br />
EPCs while cells adhering in the culture plate later than<br />
48 hours are believed to be LOG EPCs [17] . The two cell<br />
populations are shown to have morphological difference<br />
in cell culture. Early EPCs have rounded or spindlelike<br />
morphology with random dispersion on the culture plate<br />
whereas LOG EPCs appear as cobblestonelike clusters<br />
with elongated cells at the periphery and form colonies<br />
in culture [18] . Apart from their difference in morphology,<br />
it is interesting to note that the two cell populations<br />
have been shown to have different roles in neovascularization<br />
and vascular repair. Early EPCs mainly produce<br />
angiogenic growth factors, which support the proliferation<br />
and promote the functioning of LOG EPCs and mature<br />
tissueresident endothelial cells for neovascularization.<br />
LOG EPCs demonstrate high proliferative activity and<br />
are directly incorporated into the endothelium of newly<br />
formed blood vessels [19] . Thus, LOG EPCs are considered<br />
to be the true endothelial progenitor candidates in<br />
vascular developmental biology while early EPCs are proangiogenic<br />
cell population, which support the local neovascularization<br />
indirectly.<br />
THE INVOLVEMENT OF EPCS IN<br />
NEOVASCULARIZATION OF WOUND HEALING<br />
The recruitment and incorporation of EPCs in the formation<br />
of new microvessels in wounds requires coordinated<br />
and multidisciplined steps. It involves sensing the<br />
7. Takahashi T., Kalka C., Masuda H., Chen D., Silver M., Kearney M., Magner M.,<br />
Isner J.M., Asahara T. Ischemia- and cytokine-induced mobilization of bone<br />
marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells for neovascularization. Nat Med 1999:<br />
5: 434-438.<br />
8. Tepper O.M., Galiano R.D., Capla J.M., Kalka C., Gagne P.J., Jacobowitz G.R.,<br />
Levine J.P., Gurtner G.C. Human endothelial progenitor cells from type II diabetics<br />
exhibit impaired proliferation, adhesion, and incorporation into vascular structures.<br />
Circulation 2002: 106: 2781-2786.<br />
9. Kalka C., Masuda H., Takahashi T., Kalka-Moll W.M., Silver M., Kearney M., Li T.,<br />
Isner J.M., Asahara T. Transplantation of ex vivo expanded endothelial progenitor<br />
cells for therapeutic neovascularization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000: 97:<br />
3422-3427.<br />
10. Majka S.M., Jackson K.A., Kienstra K.A., Majesky M.W., Goodbell M.A., Hirschi<br />
K.K. Distinct progenitor populations in skeletal muscle are bone marrow derived and<br />
exhibit different cell fates during vascular regeneration. J Clin Invest 2003: 111:<br />
71-79.<br />
11. Kopp H.G., Ramos C.A., Rafii S. Contribution of endothelial progenitors and<br />
proangiogenic hematopoietic cells to vascularization of tumor and ischemic tissue.<br />
Curr Opin Hematol 2006: 13: 175-181.<br />
Science, Practice and Education<br />
ischemia signal from distanced tissues, migration of EPCs<br />
from BM to circulation, homing in of circulating EPCs to<br />
the target sites, the integration of EPCs into blood vessels<br />
and the in situ differentiation of EPCs into mature and<br />
functional endothelial cells [20] .<br />
Bone marrow is a major reservoir of adult progenitor<br />
cells which exist in a quiescent state. In the course<br />
of tissue damage or tissue hypoxia, the quantity of circulating<br />
EPCs is greatly increased by the mobilization<br />
of EPCs. The EPCs mobilization can be switched on by<br />
upregulation of endogenous factors in blood including<br />
vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [21] and fibroblast<br />
growth factor2 [22] . These stimulating factors activate<br />
matrix metalloproteinase9, resulting in the translocation<br />
of EPCs to a permissive zone ready for mobilization into<br />
blood circulation [23] .<br />
A quantity of evidence strongly supported the EPCs<br />
recruitment and homing to target sites via the stromal<br />
cell derived factor1a (SDF1a)/chemokine receptor type<br />
4 (CXCR4) axis [<strong>24</strong>] . SDF1a expression is upregulated<br />
under hypoxic conditions and it binds exclusively to<br />
CXCR4. Accordingly, experimental studies demonstrated<br />
that blockage of either SDF1a or CXCR4 significantly<br />
reduced the adhesion of EPCs to mature endothelial cells<br />
monolayer in vitro [25] and the in vivo homing of circulating<br />
EPCs to ischemic limb in hindlimb ischemic model [26] .<br />
Integration of circulating EPCs to blood vessels involves<br />
the participation of integrins. It has been proposed<br />
that adhesion of EPCs is similar to the adhesion mechanisms<br />
of leukocyte on endothelium [27] . One of the integrins,<br />
leukocyte b2integrins, has been demonstrated<br />
to be involved in EPCs adhesion mechanisms. In vitro<br />
adhesion assay revealed that b2integrins mediated the<br />
adhesion of peripheral blood derived EPCs to endothelial<br />
cell monolayers [28] . Moreover, a growing body showed the<br />
essential role of b2integrins in EPCs homing to ischemic<br />
tissues and for the neovascularization capacity in vivo [29] .<br />
After that, subsequent step of transendothelial migration<br />
12. Hill J.M., Zalos G., Halcox J.P., Schenke W.H., Waclawiw M.A., Quyyumi A.A.,<br />
Finkel T. Circulating endothelial progenitor cells, vascular function and cardiovascular<br />
risk. N Engl J Med 2003: 348: 593-600.<br />
13. Thomas R.A., Pietrzak D.C., Scicchitano M.S., Thomas H.C., McFarland D.C.,<br />
Frazier K.S. Detection and characterization of circulating endothelial progenitor cells<br />
in normal rat blood. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 2009: 60(3): 263-274.<br />
14. Sekiguchi H., Li M., Jujo K., Yokoyama A., Hagiwara N., Asahara T. Improved<br />
culture-based isolation of differentiating endothelial progenitor cells from mouse<br />
bone marrow mononuclear cells. Plos one 2011: 6(12): e28639.<br />
15. Hristov M., Schmitz S., Schuhmann C., Leyendecker T., Von Hundelshausen P.,<br />
Krotz F., Sohn H.Y., Nauwelaers F.A., Weber C. An optimized flow cytometry<br />
protocol for analysis of angiogenic monocytes and endothelial progenitor cells in<br />
peripheral blood. ISAC 2009: 75A: 848-853.<br />
16. Mazzolai L., Bouzourene K., Hayoz D., Dignat-George F., Liu J.W., Bounameaux H.,<br />
Dunoyer-Geindre S., Kruithof. E.K.O. Characterization of human late outgrowth<br />
endothelial progenitor-derived cells under various flow conditions. J Vasc Res 2011:<br />
48: 443-451.<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 17<br />
�
10th Scientific Meeting of the<br />
Diabetic Foot<br />
Study Group<br />
of the EASD<br />
28-30 September <strong>2012</strong><br />
BerlinPotsdam, Germany<br />
Conference theme<br />
Advancement<br />
of knowledge<br />
on all aspects of<br />
diabetic foot care<br />
Main subjects during conference:<br />
� Epidemiology<br />
� Basic and clinical science<br />
� Diagnostics<br />
� Classification<br />
� Foot clinics<br />
� Biomechanics, Osteoarthropathy<br />
� Orthopaedic surgery<br />
� Infection<br />
� Revascularisation<br />
� Uraemia<br />
� Wound healing/outcome<br />
www.dfsg.org<br />
is vital for migration of EPCs from blood vessels to active<br />
site of neovascularization in wound area. However, less is<br />
known about the transendothelial migration of EPCs. Several<br />
in vitro studies provided the relation of high expression<br />
of CD99 or PECAM in EPCs, which could facilitate the<br />
migration of EPCs through endothelial monolayer [30,31] .<br />
Although the role of EPCs in the involvement of neovascularization<br />
in wound healing is extensively investigated,<br />
the genetic cascades regulating the maturation to<br />
functional endothelial cells in the adult system are largely<br />
unknown. During embryonic development, vascular endothelial<br />
growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor play a crucial<br />
role in stimulating hemangioblast differentiation into<br />
endothelial lineage [32] . VEGF can strongly upregulate the<br />
expression of endothelial cell markers on progenitor cells<br />
and thus increase the number of cell population capable<br />
of repairing the endothelial monolayer and improving<br />
vascular function. Besides, VEGF also initiates ex vivo<br />
endothelial differentiation of various adult progenitor<br />
precursor population [33] .<br />
EPCS ALTERATIONS IN DIABETES<br />
Incomplete and prolonged wound healing is caused by<br />
compromised neovascularization, reduced cell recruitment<br />
and defects in collagen matrix formation. Wound healing<br />
requires the combined effort of inflammatory and noninflammatory<br />
cells. EPCs are involved in a large proportion<br />
of the noninflammatory cells that migrate to the skin<br />
for normal repair. Within the spectrum of diabetes, substantial<br />
in vitro studies demonstrated a significant EPCs<br />
reduction and dysfunction in type 1 and type 2 diabetes.<br />
Fadini et al. confirmed for the first time that type 2 diabetes<br />
was associated with severe depletion of circulating<br />
CD34 + /VEGFR2 + EPCs, with the lowest level of circulating<br />
EPCs in ischemic foot lesions [34] . Tepper et al. found<br />
that EPCs isolated from type 2 diabetic patients exhibited<br />
decreased proliferation and adherence to endothelial cells.<br />
They were less likely to participate in tubule formation,<br />
17. Sieveking D.P., Buckle A., Celermajer D.S., Ng M.K.C. Strikingly different angiogenic<br />
properties of endothelial progenitor cell subpopulations. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008: 51:<br />
660-668.<br />
18. Yoder M.C., Mead L.E., Prater D., Krier T.R., Mroueh K.N., Li F., Krasich R., Temm<br />
C.J., Prchal J.T., Ingram D.A. Redefining endothelial progenitor cells via clonal<br />
analysis and hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell principals. Blood 2007: 109:<br />
1801-1809.<br />
19. Shantsila E., Watson T., Tse H.F., Lip G.Y.H. New insights on endothelial progenitor<br />
cell subpopulations and their angiogenic properties. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008: 51:<br />
669-671.<br />
20. Hristov M., Weber C. Progenitor cell trafficking in the vascular wall. J Thromb<br />
Haemost 2009: 7(Suppl. 1): 31-34.<br />
21. Kalka C., Masuda H., Takahashi T., Gordon R., Tepper O., Gravereaux E., Pieczek<br />
A., Iwaguro H., Hayashi S.I., Isner J.M., Asahara T. Vascular endothelial growth<br />
factor165 gene transfer augments circulating endothelial progenitor cells in human<br />
subjects. Circ Res 2000: 86: 1198-1202.<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2
suggesting that hyperglycemia destructed EPC biology [35] .<br />
Loomans et al. obtained nearly identical results in type 1<br />
diabetic patients [36] . Moreover, many phenotypes of EPCs<br />
appeared to be altered in diabetes. Egan et al. revealed a<br />
significant decreased expression of the surface antigen in<br />
EPCs by flow cytometry including CD31, CD34, CD133,<br />
VEGFR2, VEcadherin, vWF and CXCR4 [37] . However,<br />
these established observations have no detailed mechanistic<br />
explanation of the EPCs defects in diabetes. Circulating<br />
EPCs reduction in diabetes can theoretically account for<br />
decreased survival; change in the mobilization mechanism<br />
from BM; altered extravascular homing and deranged differentiation.<br />
There is evidence that EPCs from diabetic patients<br />
displayed a reduced survival followed by an increased<br />
rate of apoptotic cell death. Abundant in vivo animal studies<br />
provided the evidence that diabetes led to an inability<br />
of EPCs to mobilize from BM to peripheral circulation<br />
under ischemia conditions [38] . In support of the hypothesis<br />
of EPCs deranged differentiation, one study observed that<br />
peripheral blood mononuclear cells were more prone to<br />
differentiate into proinflammatory phenotype than into<br />
EPCs phenotype in high glucose level [39] . Taking all these<br />
findings together, diabetes seems to alter EPC biology,<br />
thus inhibiting EPCs recruitment and incorporation to<br />
the active site of vasculogenesis in diabetic wound healing.<br />
PROMISING CELL-BASED THERAPy IN<br />
DIABETIC WOUND HEALING<br />
Among the various type of stem or progenitor cells, EPCs<br />
are one of the representatives that have been moved from<br />
experimental models to clinical trials. EPCs have been<br />
tested in patients with acute and chronic ischemic heart<br />
disease, and the outcomes were very promising. Assmus<br />
et al. allocated patients with acute myocardial infarction<br />
(AMI) to receive intracoronary infusion of either<br />
BMderived or PBderived progenitor cells. The results<br />
demonstrated the patients with AMI had regeneration<br />
enhancement in global left ventricular ejection fraction<br />
22. Fontaine V., Filipe C., Werner N., Gourdy P., Billon A., Garmy-Susini B., Brouchet L.,<br />
Bayard F., Prats H., Doetschman T., Nickenig G., Arnal J.F. Essential role of bone<br />
marrow fibroblast growth factor-2 in the effect of estradiol on reendothelialization<br />
and endothelial progenitor cell mobilization. Am J Pathol 2006: 169: 1855-1862.<br />
23. Rafii S., Lyden D. Therapeutic stem and progenitor cell transplantation for organ<br />
vascularization and regeneration. Nat Med 2003: 9: 702-712.<br />
<strong>24</strong>. Ceradini D.J., Gurtner G.C. Homing to hypoxia: HIF-1 as a mediator of progenitor<br />
cell recruitment to injured tissue. Trends Cardiovasc Med 2005: 15: 57-63.<br />
25. Ceradini D.J., Kulkarni A.R., Callaghan M.J., Tepper O.M., Bastidas N., Kleinman<br />
M.E., Capla J.M., Galiano R.D., Levine J.P., Gurtner G.C. Progenitor cell trafficking<br />
is regulated by hypoxic gradients through HIF-1 induction of SDF-1. Nat Med 2004:<br />
10: 858–864.<br />
26. Walter D.H., Haendeler J., Reinhold J., Rochwalsky U., Seeger F., Honold J.,<br />
Hoffmann J., Urbich C., Lehmann R., Arenzana-Seisdesdos F., Aicher A., Heeschen<br />
C., Fichtlscherer S., Zeiher A.M., Dimmeler S. Impaired CXCR4 signaling contributes<br />
to the reduced neovascularization capacity of endothelial progenitor cells from<br />
patients with coronary artery disease. Circ Res 2005: 97: 1142–1151.<br />
27. Urbich C., Chavakis E., Dimmeler S. Homing and differentiation of endothelial<br />
progenitor cells. In D. Marme & N. Fusenig (Eds.). New York: Springer: Tumor<br />
angiogenesis; 2008. p. 309-3<strong>24</strong>.<br />
Science, Practice and Education<br />
from 51.6+9.6% to 60.1+8.6% (p=0.003) and regional<br />
wall motion in the infarct zone from 1.5+0.2 SD/chord<br />
to 0.5+0.7SD/chord (p
Science, Practice and Education<br />
have been conducted using traditional Chinese medicine<br />
(TCM) in improving diabetic wound healing in Prince of<br />
Wales Hospital (Hong Kong) and the Chinese University<br />
of Hong Kong respectively. In 2001, Wong et al. first demonstrated<br />
TCM in combination with simple debridement<br />
as an alternative treatment of diabetic foot ulcer. Two<br />
herbal drinks were orally taken by the patients. The first<br />
herbal preparation consisted of Radix Astragali, Rhizoma<br />
atractylodis marcocephala, Radix stephaniae tetrandrae,<br />
Radix polygoni multiflori, Radix rehmanniae and Radix<br />
smilax china which was aimed at muscle strengthening and<br />
swelling control. Another herbal preparation contained<br />
Radix rehmanniae, Fructus corni, Rhizoma dioscoreae,<br />
Cortex moutan, Rhizoma alismatis, Rhizoma smilacis glabrae,<br />
Radix astragli and Fructus schisandrae which promoted<br />
regeneration. The results showed that about 85%<br />
of diabetic patients avoided limb amputation. The consumption<br />
of herbal preparations in patients appeared to<br />
offer improvement in the local circulation as exemplified<br />
by improved warmth and color of the toes. In addition,<br />
granulation tissue formation at the ulcer bed was observed<br />
as a sign of improvement [42,43] . In our previous clinical<br />
study, the herbal extracts exhibited significant wound<br />
healing effect in diabetic patients. In order to simply and<br />
modify the TCM formula, individual herbs were tested<br />
for the fibroblast viability in CRL7522 fibroblast cell line<br />
and primary fibroblasts from a diabetic foot ulcer patient.<br />
The results supported the previously reported clinical efficacies<br />
of the two herbal preparations and indicated the<br />
individual herb with compromised primary fibroblast viability<br />
effect [44] . With the results of our expertise, Tam<br />
et al. presented the first scientific evidence towards the<br />
efficacy of a Chinese herbal formula (NF3) with Radix<br />
33. Dimmeler S., Aicher A., Vasa M., Mildner-Rihm C., Adler K., Tiemann M., Rutten<br />
H., Fichtlscherer S., Martin H., Zeiher A.M. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins)<br />
increase endothelial progenitor cells via the PI 3-kinase/Akt pathway. J Clin Invest<br />
2001: 108: 391–397.<br />
34. Fadini G.P., Miorin M., Facco M., Bonamico S., Baesso I., Grego F., Menegolo M.,<br />
Vigili de Kreutzenberg S., Tiengo A., Agostini C., Avogaro A. Circulating endothelial<br />
progenitor cells are reduced in peripheral vascular complications of type 2 diabetes<br />
mellitus. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005: 45: 1449-1457.<br />
35. Tepper O.M., Galiano R.D., Capla J.M., Kalka C., Gagne P.J., Jacobowitz G.R.,<br />
Levine J.P., Gurtner G.C. Human endothelial progenitor cells from type II diabetics<br />
exhibit impaired proliferation, adhesion, and incorporation into vascular structures.<br />
Circulation 2002: 106: 2781-2786.<br />
36. Loomans C.J.M., De Koning E.J.P., Staal F.J.T., Rookmaaker M.B., Verseyden C.,<br />
De Boer H.C., Verhaar M.C., Braam B., Rabelink T.J., Van Zonneveld A.J. Endothelial<br />
progenitor cell dysfunction: a novel concept in the pathogenesis of vascular<br />
complications of type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 2004: 53: 195-199.<br />
37. Egan C.G., Lavery R., Caporali F., Fondelli C., Laghi-Pasini F., Dotta F., Sorrentino<br />
V. Generalised reduction of putative endothelial progenitors and CXCR4-positive<br />
peripheral blood cells in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2008: 51: 1296-1305.<br />
38. Fadini G.P., Sartore S., Schiavon M., Albiero M., Baesso I., Cabrelle A., Agostini C.,<br />
Avogaro A. Diabetes impairs progenitor cell mobilization after hindlimb ischemiareperfusion<br />
injury in rats. Diabetologia 2006: 49: 3075-3084.<br />
20<br />
astragali and Radix rehmanniae in the ratio of 2:1 in enhancing<br />
wound healing in a chemically induced diabetic<br />
foot ulcer rat model (p
New reasons to share a smile!<br />
Visit our booth at the <strong>EWMA</strong> Conference to learn more about how Safetac minimises pain<br />
Much has happened in a year, and we can’t wait to share<br />
the most exciting news with you at this year’s <strong>EWMA</strong>!<br />
Come to our bobth to learn about our new and revolutionary products. Mepitel ® Film, a<br />
gentle transparent breathable film dressing for skin protection, is the world’s first film with<br />
Safetac ® , and one of many new reasons for patients and clinicians to smile!<br />
Presenting New Science<br />
In Pressure Ulcer Prevention<br />
Learn more about new science in pressure ulcer prevention when<br />
attending the Mölnlycke Health Care Satellite Symposium at the<br />
European Wound Management Association Conference, Vienna, <strong>2012</strong>.<br />
Thursday <strong>24</strong>th <strong>May</strong>, 13:15 to 14:15 in Room E1<br />
Despite the widespread use of prevention strategies, pressure ulceration remains<br />
a significant clinical and economic challenge to health care providers, as well as<br />
impacting negatively on the quality of life of patients, their families and carers.<br />
Chaired by Professor Michael Clark (President of the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory<br />
Panel), the goals of this symposium are to emphasise the importance of developing<br />
new strategies that will reduce the clinical, economic and social burden of pressure<br />
ulcers; and to present new scientific and clinical data relating to the use of five-layered<br />
soft silicone dressings as an adjunct to standard preventative interventions.<br />
Speakers – Professor Michael Clark, Paulo Alves, Professor Cees Oomens.<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2012</strong> VIENNA
Is the<br />
chemistry<br />
right? <strong>EWMA</strong><br />
When it comes to NPWT, the foam makes all the difference.<br />
A comparative study 1,2 by HARTMANN shows that for NPWT products, the type of foam used really does matter. Significant differences<br />
in the body's inflammatory response show that different foams can accelerate efficient wound healing. Could this make NPWT even more<br />
economical? Vivano. Safety. And Simplicity.<br />
You can find more information at our trade fair booth or at www.vivanosystem.info<br />
Source: 1 Croizat et al., Journal of Investigative Dermatology (2011) 131: S134. 2 Walch et al., Wound Repair and Regeneration (2011) 19: A91.<br />
<strong>2012</strong><br />
Visit our symposium:<br />
Hall E2 on Wednesday;<br />
23/05/12 at 12:30–1:30 pm
Presented at<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> 2011<br />
Brussels · Belgium<br />
Bacteriophages for the treatment<br />
of severe infections:<br />
A ‘new’ option for the future?<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
The worldwide emergence of “Superbugs” and<br />
a dry antibiotic pipeline threaten a return to the<br />
preantibiotic era, i.e. prior to the 1940s when<br />
millions of people died of bacterial infection 1 .<br />
In hospitals in both highincome and lowincome<br />
countries, the majority of nosocomial<br />
outbreaks are caused by a small group of pathogens<br />
– Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus,<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumanni,<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacter species,<br />
hereafter referred to as “the ESKAPE bugs.”<br />
These ESKAPE bugs are increasingly prevalent<br />
in our hospitals and increasingly resistant to many<br />
of our antimicrobial agents threatening patients’<br />
lives and confronting society with huge socioeconomic<br />
costs 1 .<br />
While extensively drug resistant Acinetobacter<br />
baumannii, often associated with military operations<br />
(Iraq, Afghanistan), NDM1 containing Enterobacteriaceae,<br />
panresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa<br />
clones and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus<br />
aureus (MRSA) are mainly prevalent in our hospitals,<br />
it seems that the community as a whole is<br />
threatened by these worrisome pathogens. This<br />
was demonstrated by the EAHEC 0104:H4 epidemic<br />
in Germany in 2011 25 . Some infectious<br />
agents are indeed not confined to human beings<br />
but actually deeply settled in our environment.<br />
Beside the overuse, and misuse of antibiotics in<br />
human medicine it seems also more and more evident<br />
that the animal food production sector serves<br />
as a major antibiotic consumer and consequently a<br />
reservoir for multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria.<br />
Our ever growing and crowded cities also seem<br />
to play a role in the emergence of these ESKAPE<br />
bugs 68 . Taking all this into account it is evident<br />
that the situation is alarming.<br />
A reflection on the biological role of natural, as<br />
well as (semi)synthetic antibiotics, in nature as<br />
secondary metabolites and their use as antimi<br />
crobial agents in human, veterinary and agrobio<br />
industry reveals that we still have much to learn<br />
about these molecules. The lack of fundamental<br />
knowledge on the actual role of antibiotics (secondary<br />
metabolites often functioning as signalling<br />
molecules) in nature and their effect on living systems<br />
(bacteria) in relation with the whole ecological<br />
setting means that we actually disequilibrate<br />
our natural environment as a consequence of the<br />
mis/over use of those molecules. This biological<br />
phenomenon of antibiotic resistance is typically<br />
an emergent characteristic of a dynamic, highly<br />
complex and selforganizing system that evolves<br />
at the edge of chaos 910 .<br />
Antibiotics are typically studied and developed<br />
through models in which the bacteria are in a<br />
planktonic (free living and growing) life style, but<br />
most of the infections seem to be due to bacterial<br />
infectious foci, which mainly harbour bacteria<br />
that exhibit a biofilm life style 11 . It was shown by<br />
gene expression analysis that planktonic and biofilm<br />
lifestyle modes have distinct differential gene<br />
expression profiles. This affects, amongst other<br />
features, the bacterial sensitivity to antibiotics 1213 .<br />
These bacterial biofilmrelated findings imply<br />
that the mechanical barrier function of the biofilm<br />
is not the main reason why bacteria residing in a<br />
biofilm lifestyle mode do not respond as expected<br />
to antibiotics. Some antibiotics can diffuse into<br />
the biofilm complex and reach the bacteria, but<br />
as a consequence of the changed bacterial physiology<br />
and biochemical pathways in the biofilm<br />
modus some antibiotics cannot interfere with the<br />
biofilm bacteria in the same way as they would<br />
do with free living and proliferating planktonic<br />
bacteria. In a biofilm the bacterial growth rate is<br />
dramatically slowed down while the mechanical<br />
barrier protects them essentially from the immune<br />
system. Antibiotics were developed only taking<br />
into account the bacterium’s planktonic lifestyle,<br />
but we know today that biofilms play a major role<br />
�<br />
Science, Practice and Education<br />
1 Daniel De Vos, PhD<br />
1 Gilbert Verbeken, MSc<br />
1,2 Thomas Rose, MD<br />
2 Serge Jennes, MD<br />
1 Jean-Paul Pirnay, PhD<br />
1 Laboratory for Molecular<br />
and Cellular Technology,<br />
2 Burn Wound Centre,<br />
Queen Astrid Military<br />
Hospital, Brussels, Belgium<br />
Correspondence:<br />
daniel.devos2@mil.be<br />
Conflict of interest: none<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 23
THE <strong>EWMA</strong><br />
UNIVERSITY<br />
CONFERENCE<br />
MODEL (UCM)<br />
in Vienna<br />
The <strong>EWMA</strong> UCM programme offers students of wound<br />
management from institutes of higher education across Europe<br />
the opportunity to take part of their academic studies whilst<br />
participating in the <strong>EWMA</strong> Conference.<br />
The opportunity of participating in the <strong>EWMA</strong> UCM is available<br />
to all teaching institutions with wound management courses for<br />
health professionals.<br />
The UCM programme at the <strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2012</strong> Conference<br />
in Vienna will focus on increasing the networking opportunities<br />
between the students from various UCM groups participating<br />
in the programme this year.<br />
In addition to the main conference programme, UCM Lectures<br />
as well as assignments and workshops for mixed groups will<br />
be arranged specifically for the UCM students.<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> strongly encourages teaching institutions and students<br />
from all countries to benefit from the possibilities of international<br />
networking and access to lectures by many of the most<br />
experienced wound management experts in the world.<br />
Yours sincerely<br />
Zena Moore,<br />
Chair of the Education Committee, Immediate Past President<br />
Participating institutions:<br />
Donau Universität Krems<br />
Austria<br />
Haute École de Santé<br />
Geneva, Switzerland<br />
KATHO university college Roeselare<br />
Belgium<br />
University of Hertfordshire<br />
United Kingdom<br />
ienna<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
23-25 <strong>May</strong><br />
Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Lisboa<br />
Portugal<br />
HUB Brussels<br />
Belgium<br />
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences<br />
Lithuania<br />
Universidade Católica Portuguesa<br />
Porto, Portugal<br />
For further information about the <strong>EWMA</strong> UCM, please visit<br />
the Education section of the <strong>EWMA</strong> website www.ewma.org<br />
or contact the <strong>EWMA</strong> Secretariat at ewma@ewma.org<br />
in most infectious states 11 . New strategies, based on fundamental<br />
biofilm research to cope with this problem are<br />
under development. Recently, a review on bacterial biofilms<br />
was published in this journal by Antonio Fonseca 14 .<br />
Apart from the overuse and misuse of antibiotics there<br />
are thus several additional reasons for the antibiotic crisis<br />
which is partly a consequence of our current socio economic<br />
society 15 . The pharmaceutical industry is not eager<br />
to develop new antibiotics due to the long term resourceintensive<br />
research and development costs while knowing<br />
that eventually resistance will emerge and the return on<br />
investment will decrease. As the industry antibiotic pipeline<br />
is virtually dry and infectious diseases steadily on the<br />
increase, experts struggle to find acceptable solutions 16<br />
18 . The use of bacteriophages, bacterio specific viruses, is<br />
currently being (re)considered as a sensible option. Last<br />
year several reports of clinical applications in animals and<br />
humans were published 19<strong>24</strong> . With our actual knowledge<br />
we can consider that bacteriophages are not harmful for<br />
eukaryotic organisms, such as humans. Eukaryotic organisms<br />
include fungi, plants and animals (including humans).<br />
They typically have a specific membranebound<br />
nucleus with its specific biochemical enzyme systems and<br />
organelles in contrast to the prokaryotic bacteria. Thus<br />
bacteriophages are bacteriospecific viruses that naturally<br />
cannot infect and replicate in a eukaryotic cell. In order<br />
to enter their host cell they need specific outer membrane<br />
receptors beside the specific bacterial biochemical machinery<br />
for replication. Bacteriophages (meaning bacteria eaters)<br />
are in fact the bacteria’s natural predators. As such<br />
they keep bacterial populations growth under control.<br />
Wherever bacteria are present there are bacteriophages<br />
(or phages in short) which are generally present in at least<br />
a ten times higher order of magnitude than the bacteria<br />
themselves and consequently constitute the most abundant<br />
biological lifelike constituents of the biosphere of this<br />
planet 25 . This observation shows us that actually we live<br />
in an ocean of phages and have done since the dawn of<br />
the human species and that natural phages are in principle<br />
harmless to us. Ecologically they are key as bacterial controllers<br />
and it is this ‘natural function’ of bacteriophages<br />
that phage therapy is exploiting. In combination with or<br />
as substitute for antibiotics they could be a therapeutic<br />
option in the eradication or control of bacterial colonisations/infections.<br />
Indeed applying a specific natural lytic<br />
bacteriophage, targeted against a specific pathogenic bacterium,<br />
on for example an infected wound, should result in<br />
the lysis of the targeted bacterium after the amplification<br />
of the phage in the bacterial cell. As a result the wound<br />
would be cleared by the phage of its noxious bacteria. In<br />
fact the bacteriophage could be considered as a self am<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2
plifying drug at the place of infection. Once the bacteria<br />
are eradicated (through lysis) or brought to a low enough<br />
density that the host’s immune system can take over the<br />
situation, the bacteriophages will also be eliminated by<br />
the host’s immune system.<br />
However today there is a lack of standardized evidencebased<br />
clinical research. This rediscovered antibacterial<br />
therapeutic approach, first proposed by d’Herelle almost<br />
a century ago, was only further developed, mostly empirically,<br />
in the former Soviet Empire 1718, 2629 . Since the<br />
early beginning of phage therapy this approach was continuously<br />
used in medical practice and empirically adapted<br />
so that today in countries like Georgia, phage therapy is<br />
considered an established medical practice not requiring<br />
any further questioning. To reintroduce it however in our<br />
actual medical practice requires clinical studies in accordance<br />
with current standards. But documenting a “lifelike”<br />
entity is not the same as documenting a chemical static<br />
substance, what an antibiotic in fact is. Also there is the<br />
aspect related to Intellectual Property Rights (IP) that after<br />
all looks to be the thorniest problem. Phage therapy could<br />
provide a sustainable solution for the multidrug resistance<br />
crisis. Phage therapy is the use of natural exclusively lytic<br />
bacteriospecific viruses as antibacterial agent. In fact by<br />
setting up a screening system for the circulating noxious<br />
bacteria and their respective phages it will always be possible<br />
to obtain the right lytic phage against any emerging<br />
pathogen. This way of working, taking into account the<br />
coevolution of the couplet bacterium/phage, makes it<br />
just a fitting solution for a sustainable antibacterial phage<br />
therapy industry. We think that phage therapy will surely<br />
have its (exclusive) application setting(s) and in addition<br />
could be used in combination (synergy) with antibiotics30<br />
. Studies show that phages can enhance antibiotic’s<br />
activity by interaction with the bacterial biofilm modus.<br />
The search for a specific phage or phage cocktail against<br />
a specific bacterium will not take the time nor require the<br />
costs of searching and developing a new antibiotic. The<br />
search for a potent natural phage and the preparation of<br />
classic galenic preparation (physiological water, basic ointment…)<br />
containing phages is practical and feasible in the<br />
time frame of days to weeks, in contrast to new antibiotics<br />
which require many years of research and development.<br />
If an infection is caused by a panresistant bacterium it<br />
is realistic to select a specific phage for clinical use, in<br />
contrast to the search of a new antibiotic.<br />
The clinical development of phage therapy however<br />
faces major obstacles, typical of the current medicophar<br />
maceutical environment, that hamper progress<br />
18, 2829, 31<br />
n The lack of a specific adapted regulatory frame in the<br />
medicinal product regulations (mainly based on the<br />
classic static chemical drugs)<br />
Science, Practice and Education<br />
n It is difficult to obtain IP, and as a consequence<br />
difficult to find investors<br />
n The absence of welldefined, safe and targeted phage<br />
preparations (technically feasible, but due to the<br />
above mentioned reasons there are currently no<br />
dedicated therapeutic phage centres)<br />
n The societal false perception of viruses as ‘enemies<br />
of life’.<br />
AIM AND METHOD<br />
It was our aim to evaluate the potential of phage therapy<br />
and to bring it eventually to the patient.<br />
A multidisciplinary team of biologists, medical doctors<br />
and pharmacists was established and worked simultaneously,<br />
from the start, on different aspects, ranging from the<br />
regulatory to the in vitro and in vivo (clinical) experiments<br />
of this antibacterial treatment.<br />
n An exhaustive analysis of the current relevant drug or<br />
medicinal products regulatory frameworks was performed<br />
to analyse whether they could cater for phage<br />
therapy.<br />
n A smallscale production process for the preparation<br />
of quality controlled and welldefined phage cocktails<br />
for clinical use was setup. The elaboration of<br />
this project involved several research groups and a<br />
clinical team. Parts of the quality control tests would<br />
be outsourced. The final goal was to use this bacteriophage<br />
cocktail as a topical treatment against MDR<br />
P. aeruginosa and MRSA infected wounds in a pilot<br />
trial in burn wound patients with the agreement of a<br />
Belgian Medical Ethical Committee.<br />
n To foster national and international interactions and<br />
to promote phage therapy in Europe, an international<br />
organization ‘Phages for Human Applications<br />
Group – Europe’ (P.H.A.G.E.) was created.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
An analysis of the regulatory framework and multiple discussions<br />
with several experts as well as the relevant competent<br />
authorities revealed that clinical phage therapy applications<br />
in the EU are possible, but that the regulatory<br />
frame is not welladapted 2829 .<br />
Although the development of phages as classical<br />
medicinal products like an antibiotics, including Good<br />
Manufacturing Practices (GMP) production, preclinical<br />
and phase I, II and III clinical trial and marketing is possible,<br />
it is, in our opinion, not the most appropriate route<br />
Such a developmental path would cost millions of Euros<br />
and take many years (± 10 years for biologicals). These<br />
investments are not compatible with the apparent lack of<br />
Intellectual Property (IP) protection (at least for natural<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 25<br />
�
phages). Phages, as natural entities, belong to mankind<br />
as a whole, and cannot be patented in the classical sense.<br />
Also the idea of phage therapy itself first put forward by<br />
Felix d’Herelle who coined the name of bacteriophages<br />
meaning ‘bacterium eating entities’, cannot, in principle,<br />
be patented since it belongs to the common knowledge<br />
and has done for almost a century. This situation does not<br />
stimulate the industry to invest, since the actual paradigm<br />
is “no IP, no investment” 15 18 .<br />
To overcome this embarrassing situation, new views<br />
and consequent ways of (pharmaceutical) industrial models<br />
have to be developed 29 .<br />
Established pharmaceutical companies are not likely<br />
to invest substantial amounts of money and time in the<br />
development of potentially interesting products that will<br />
need to be adapted (evolve) even more quickly than flu<br />
vaccines, to be effective. This fast adaptation is needed to<br />
exploit the main advantage of phages over classical ‘static’<br />
drugs such as antibiotics, namely their ability to rapidly (in<br />
a matter of days to weeks) evolve to target emerging pathogenic<br />
strains. This is possible by continuously screening<br />
bacteria and their phages, as is also done in Georgia. This<br />
“Surmesure” or tailormade pathway for the future implementation<br />
of phage therapy is proposed and discussed<br />
by Pirnay et al 29 . This view is also what was proposed to<br />
the Innovation Task Force (ITF) at EMA. The discussion<br />
is still ongoing.<br />
Non profit institutions like hospitals that would like<br />
to develop phage therapy are not necessarily disheartened<br />
by the IP issues and the uncertainty of large profits, but<br />
are generally unable to generate the necessary funding and<br />
are furthermore most likely better served by a tailormade<br />
(e.g. to a patient or an outbreak) approach 29 . This means<br />
that in a timeframe of days to weeks a specific phage can<br />
always be found to target a specific emerging pathogen.<br />
It is this specific power of phage therapy, namely its coevolutionary<br />
aspect, which guarantees an efficient antibacterial<br />
agent when needed.<br />
As a result of this conundrum, until now, only local<br />
and sporadic phage applications were performed in the<br />
Western World, often under the umbrella of the Declaration<br />
of Helsinki. In Poland, an EU member state, a specific<br />
national adaptive regulation, based on the Declaration of<br />
Helsinki, was issued to regulate phage therapy. A medical<br />
doctor is allowed to apply phage therapy where proven<br />
therapeutic methods do not exist or have been ineffective<br />
(e.g. MDR infections) and provided that the patient or his<br />
legal representative signs an informed consent.<br />
In France, Dr. Alain Dublanchet, a veteran of phage<br />
therapy, occasionally applies phages in desperate osteomyelitis<br />
cases and with success <strong>24</strong>, 29 In Australia, phage<br />
therapy was recently applied under the umbrella of “compassionate<br />
use” for the successful treatment of refractory<br />
P. aeruginosa urinary tract infection in a cancer patient <strong>24</strong> .<br />
26<br />
Figure 1.<br />
BFC-1 transmission electron micrographs (.<br />
a) P. aeruginosa bacteriophage 14/1, a member of the<br />
Myoviridae family. Bar: 100 nm.<br />
b) PNM bacteriophages (Podoviridae) freed from a burst<br />
P. aeruginosa bacterium. Bar: 500 nm.<br />
c) Bacteriophage 14/1 attaching to the P. aeruginosa cell wall.<br />
Bar: 200 nm.<br />
d) ISP bacteriophages (Myoviridae) attaching to S. aureus.<br />
Bar: 500 nm.<br />
Ref. 26 Merabishvili et al 2009.<br />
In Belgium a basic clinical safety trial was performed with<br />
the approval of a leading Medical Ethical Committee.<br />
Clinical trials of course need safe and welldefined<br />
phages. Therefore a phage cocktail (BFC1) that targeted<br />
the most prevalent MDR P. aeruginosa and MRSA bacteria<br />
was produced. The cocktail consisted of two phages<br />
against P. aeruginosa and one against S. aureus (Fig. 1). It<br />
was produced on a small scale and in accordance with basic<br />
clinicalpharmaceutical standards (sterility, apyrogenicity,<br />
pH, cytotoxicity, adequate shelf life and stability). In<br />
addition, the phages in BFC1 were proven to be exclusively<br />
lytic and characterized at the genomic and proteomic<br />
level. This specific production process was published by<br />
Merabishvili et al. 32 and is actually used as a basic discussion<br />
document for future adaptations in the regulatory<br />
documentation process.<br />
BFC1 was applied, in a small pilot study, in the burn<br />
unit of the Queen Astrid Military Hospital (9 patients,<br />
10 applications) (Fig. 2). This was one of the first unconcealed<br />
phage applications in modern Western medicine.<br />
As expected, no adverse events or side effects were observed<br />
based on clinical as well as laboratorymeasurable param<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2
Figure 2.a.<br />
The final product, a bacteriophage cocktail ready for use<br />
in a human clinical trial. (Ref 26)<br />
Figure 2.b.<br />
Application of BFC-1 on an infected burn wound using a syringe<br />
spray. (Ref 26)<br />
Actually phages could be applied by a spray or a galenic ointment<br />
formulation. Before application on wounds the wound bed should<br />
always be cleaned, debrided and rinsed with bicarbonated<br />
physiological water in order to provide a neutral pH environment.<br />
This is to allow the phages to be stable. Too acidic or alkaline<br />
environments cause phage degradation (protein denaturation).<br />
Studies are warranted in order to optimize applications and<br />
frequency of application as well as the type of the most suited<br />
galenic formulation in function for the site of use.<br />
eters. This small pilot safety trial, showing the innocuity<br />
of phages when applied to burns, was discussed in a review<br />
by Kutter and colleagues 27 . In addition, we successfully<br />
applied (systemically, through a wound drain) large quantities<br />
of BFC1 (300 ml of 10 5 phage particles), under the<br />
Declaration of Helsinki, in a critical pelvic trauma patient<br />
with MDR P. aeruginosa and MRSA osteomyelitis.<br />
Over the years, it has become clear that, in order to develop<br />
phage therapy, an adapted regulatory framework<br />
and eventually even a change in (medical/pharmaceutical)<br />
mentality and developmental models needs to be achieved.<br />
Especially the natural evolutionary and sustainability aspects<br />
of the approach, not compatible with our current<br />
bio/pharmaceutical business models where IP issues are at<br />
the core, have to be taken into consideration when developing<br />
phage therapy. The P.H.A.G.E. network allowed<br />
us to discuss fundamental and practical issues such as the<br />
Science, Practice and Education<br />
status of phages (e.g. are they (classical) drugs?), exchange<br />
information on applications and services and subsequently<br />
to efficiently interact with authorities like the European<br />
Medicines Agency (EMA).<br />
In February 2011 we officially interpellated the EU<br />
parliament: ‘what is the status of phage as antibacterial<br />
agent’ which brought the discussion to the European<br />
level. The question was put on the agenda by the Belgian<br />
Christian democrat Ivo Belet and his colleague Catherine<br />
Trautmann from the Socialist faction in France. The<br />
Commission’s view was that the current regulatory framework<br />
was sufficient for “phage therapy”, a standpoint we<br />
clearly don’t share. Indeed if we consider the phage as a<br />
static chemical substance we cannot develop phage therapy<br />
as it should be developed in a sustainable efficacious way<br />
and tailor made as discussed by Pirnay et al 29 .<br />
Concerning the “false perception of viruses as enemies of<br />
life” obstacle, which we feared when starting our clinical<br />
trial, we found – to our surprise – that it was easily resolved<br />
through clear and scientific communication with<br />
the members of the ethical committee as well as the medical<br />
and nursing staff of the hospital.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
Natural phages are not straightforward inanimate and stable<br />
substances, but rather lifelike evolvable natural biological<br />
entities. The major obstacle hampering the further development<br />
of phage therapy at large, in wound treatment<br />
as well as in other clinical settings (otitis, osteomyelitis,<br />
diabetic foot, diarrhoea, impetigo…) in our current medical/pharmaceutical<br />
environment is mainly related to the<br />
intellectual IP issues.<br />
The existing relevant regulatory frameworks and business<br />
models are not compatible with a dynamic sustainable<br />
phage therapy concept. And this point of view is not compatible<br />
with the current economic models that reduce the<br />
pharmaceutical industry to ‘common button’ producers,<br />
when their main societal role should be ‘providing people<br />
with adequate products for a better health’. Therefore a<br />
suitable environment should be worked out 2829 . We need<br />
to radically redesign our (pharmaceutical) economic models<br />
to cater for more dynamic and sustainable approaches<br />
that fit an eventual future green economy. We are actually<br />
bouncing against our own ‘limits’ of growth 3334 .<br />
Any future sustainable phage therapy concept should,<br />
based on scientific grounds, fully acknowledge the potentialities<br />
of the coevolutionary aspect of the couplet<br />
phage/bacterium in its ecological environment, in casu the<br />
human being 29 . Only then the inherent (positive) characteristics<br />
of phages as natural biological bacterium controllers<br />
can be put to use. Indeed, bacteria will inevitably<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 27<br />
�
Science, Practice and Education<br />
become resistant to phages, but due to the continuously<br />
ongoing arms race between the two protagonists, specific<br />
phages able to infect the formerly resistant bacterial strains<br />
will quickly emerge 29 . In fact phage therapy fits well in<br />
the new emerging field of Darwinian – evolutionary –<br />
medicine (in contrast to a classical mechanistic – man<br />
as a machine – view) where the insights of evolution are<br />
fully taken into account. Viruses, among which phages are<br />
included, were involved in the origin of life itself and play<br />
a major role in biological evolution 3536 . Hopefully they<br />
will play a role in the future control of bacterial disease.<br />
We feel that our plea for a more realistic approach, taking<br />
into account the coevolutionary aspect of the bacterium<br />
and its phage is scientifically sound. Let’s hope that the<br />
political and economic factors will adapt. m<br />
References<br />
1. Rice LB. Federal funding for the study of antimicrobial resistance in nosocomial<br />
pathogens: no ESKAPE. J Infect Dis 2008: 197(8): 1079-81.<br />
2. Levy SB, Marshall B. Antibacterial resistance worldwide: causes, challenges and<br />
responses. Nat Med 2004: 10 (12): S122-9.<br />
3. Kumarasamy K, Toleman MA, Walsh TR, Bagaria J, Butt F, Balakrishnan R,<br />
Chaudhary U, Doumith M, Giske CG, Irfan S, Krishnan P, Kumar AV, Maharjan S,<br />
Mushtaq S, Noorie T, Paterson DL, Pearson A, Perry C, Pike R, Rao B, Ray U, Sarma<br />
JB, Sharma M, Sheridan E, Thirunarayan MA, Turton J, Upadhyay S, Warner M,<br />
Welfare W, Livermore DM, Woodford N. Emergence of a new antibiotic resistance<br />
mechanism in India, Pakistan, and the UK: a molecular, biological, and epidemiological<br />
study. Lancet Infect Dis 2010: 10(9): 597-602.<br />
4. Brzuskiewicz E, Thurmer A, Schuldes J, Leinbach A, Lieregang H, Meyer FD, Boelter<br />
J, Petersen H, Gottschalk G, Daniel R. Genome sequence analyses of two isolates<br />
from the recent Escherichia coli outbreak in Germany reveal the emergence of a new<br />
pathogen type Entero-Aggregative-Haemorrhagic-Escherichia coli (EAHEC). Arch<br />
Microbial 2011: 193: Epub ahead of print.<br />
5. Pirnay JP, De Vos D, Cochez C, Bilocq F, Pirson J, Struelens M, Duinslaeger L,<br />
Cornelis P, Zizi M, Vanderkelen A. Molecular epidemiology of Pseudomonas<br />
aeruginosa colonization in a burn unit: persistence of a multidrug-resistant clone and<br />
a silver sulfadiazine-resistant clone. J Clin Microbiol 2003: 41(3): 1192-202.<br />
6. Kümmerer K, Henninger A. Promoting resistance by the emission of antibiotics from<br />
hospitals and households into effluent. Clin Microbiol Infect 2003: 9(12):1203-14.<br />
28<br />
Are you interested in<br />
submitting an article or paper<br />
for <strong>EWMA</strong> Journal?<br />
Read our author guidelines at<br />
www.ewma.org/english/authorguide<br />
7. Kümmerer K. Resistance in the environment. J Antimicrob Chemother 2004: 54(2):<br />
311-20.<br />
8. Allen HK, Donato J, Wang HH, Cloud-Hansen KA, Davies J, Handelsman J. Call of<br />
the wild: antibiotic resistance genes in natural environments. Nat Rev Microbiol<br />
2010: 8(4): 251-259.<br />
9. Martinez JL, Baquero F. Interactions among strategies associated with bacterial<br />
infection: pathogenicity, epidemicity, and antibiotic resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev<br />
2002: 15(4): 647-79.<br />
10. Baquero F, Coque TM, Canton R. Antibiotics, complexity and evolution. ASM News.<br />
2003: 69(11): 547-52.<br />
11. Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of<br />
persistent infections. Science 1999: 284(5418): 1318-22.<br />
12. Whiteley M, Bangera MG, Burngarner RE, Parsek MR, Teitzel GM, Lorry S,<br />
Greenberg EP. Gene expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Nature 2001:<br />
413(6858): 860-4.<br />
13. Beloin C, Valle J, Latour-Lambert P, Faure P, Kzreminski M, Balestrino D, Haagensen<br />
JAJ, Molin S, Prensier G, Arbeille B, Ghigo JM. Global impact of mature<br />
biofilm lifestyle on Escherichia coli K-12 gene expression. Mol Microbiol 2004: 51(3):<br />
659-74.<br />
14. Fonseca AP. Biofilms in wounds: an unsolved problem? <strong>EWMA</strong> Journal. 2011:<br />
11(2): 10-23.<br />
15. Pirnay JP, De Vos D , Zizi M , Heyman P. No easy way to exterminate ‘superbugs’ at<br />
the dawn of the third millennium. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2003: 1(4): 523-25.<br />
16. Bush K , Courvalin P , Dantas G , Davies J , Eisentstein B , Huovinen P , Jacoby GA ,<br />
Kishony R , Kreiswirth BN , Kutter E , Lerner SA , Levy S , Lewis K , Lomovskaya O ,<br />
Miller, JH , Mobashery S , Piddock LJV , Projan S , Thomas CM , Tomasz A , Tulkens<br />
PM , Walsh TR , Watson JD , Witkowski J , Witte W , Wright G , Yeh P, Zgurskaya<br />
HI. Tackling antibiotic resistance. Nat Rev Microbiol 2011: 9(11): 894-96.<br />
17. Maura D, Debarbieux L. Bacteriophages as twenty-first century antibacterial tools for<br />
food and medicine. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2011: 90(3): 851-9.<br />
18. Thiel K. Old dogma, new tricks-21st . century phage therapy. Nature Biotechnol<br />
2004: 22(1): 31-6.<br />
19. Markoishvili K, Tsitlanatze G, Katsarava R, Morris JG Jr, Sulakvelidze A. A novel<br />
sustained-release matrix based on biodegradable poly(ester amide)s and impregnated<br />
with bacteriophages and an antibiotic shows promise in management of<br />
infected venous stasis ulcers and other poorly healing wounds. Int J Dermatol. 2002:<br />
41(7): 453-8.<br />
20. Marza JA, Soothill JS, Boydell P, Collyns TA. Multiplication of therapeutically<br />
administered bacteriophages in Pseudomonas aeruginosa infected patients. Burns<br />
2006: 32(5):644-6.<br />
21. McVay CS, Velasquez M, Fralick JA. Phage therapy of Pseudomonas aeruginosa<br />
infection in a mouse burn wound model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007:<br />
51(6): 1934-8.<br />
22. Rhoads DD, Wolcott RD, Kuskowski MA, Wolcott BM, Ward LS, Sulakvelidze A.<br />
Bacteriophage therapy of venous leg ulcers in humans: results of a phase I safety<br />
trial. J Wound Care. 2009: 18(6):237-43.<br />
23. Kumari S, Hariai K, Chibber S. Bacteriophage versus antimicrobial agents for the<br />
treatment of murine burn wound infection caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae B5055.<br />
J Med Microbiol. 2011: 60(Pt2): 205-10.<br />
<strong>24</strong>. Khawalkaled A, Morales S, Dillon B, Alavidze Z, Ginn AN, Thomas L, Chapman SJ,<br />
Dublanchet A, Smithyman A, Iredell JR. Bacteriophage therapy for refractory<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa urinary tract infection. J Med Microbiol 2011: 60(11):<br />
1697-700.<br />
25. Hendrix RW. Bacteriophages: evolution of the majority. Theor Popul Biol 2002:<br />
61(4): 471-80.<br />
26. D’Herelle F. Sur un microbe invisible antagoniste des bactéries dysentériques. C R<br />
Acad Sci 1917: 165: 373-5.<br />
27. Kutter E, De Vos D, Gvasalia G, Alavidze Z, Gogokhia L, Kuhl S, Abedon ST. Phage<br />
therapy in clinical practice: treatment of human infections. Curr Pharm Biotechnol<br />
2010: 11(1): 69-86.<br />
28. Verbeken G, De Vos D, Vaneechoutte M, Merabishvili M, Zizi M, Pirnay JP.<br />
European regulatory conundrum of phage therapy. Future Microbiol 2007: 2(5):<br />
485-91.<br />
29. Pirnay JP, De Vos D, Verbeken G, Merabishvili M, Chanishvili N, Vaneechoutte M,<br />
Zizi M, Laire G, Lavigne R, Huys I, Van den Mooter G, Buckling A, Debarbieux L,<br />
Pouillot F, Azeredo J, Kutter E, Dublanchet A, Gorski A, Adamia R. The Phage<br />
paradigm: prêt-à-porter or sur-mesure? Pharm Res 2010: 28(4): 934-7.<br />
30. Comeau AM, Tétart F, Trojet SN, Prère MF, Krish HM. Phage-antibiotic synergy<br />
(PAS): beta-lactam and quinolone antibiotics stimulate virulent phagegrowth. PLoS<br />
One 2007: 2(8): e799.<br />
31. Villarreal LP. Overall issues of viruses and host evolution. In: Villareal LP, ed. Viruses<br />
and the Evolution of Life. W. A., USA: ASM press; 2005 p. 1-28.<br />
32. Merabishvili M, Pirnay JP, Verbeken G, Chanishvili N, Tediashvili M, Lashki N, Gionti<br />
T, Krylov V, Mast J, Van Parijs L, Lavigne R, Volckaert G, Matheus W, Verween G,<br />
De Corte P, Rose T, Jennes S, Zizi M, De Vos D, Vaneechoutte M. Quality-controlled<br />
small-scale production of a well-defined bacteriophage cocktail for use in human<br />
clinical trials. PLoS One. 2009: 4: e4944.<br />
33. The Group of Lisbon. Limits to Competition. Cambridge, Mass., USA: The MIT<br />
Press; 1995.<br />
34. Sachs JD. Common Wealth: economics for a crowded planet. London, UK: Penguin,<br />
2008.<br />
35. Buckling A, Rainey PB. Antagonistic coevolution between a bacterium and a<br />
bacteriophage. Proc Biol Sci 2002: 269(1494): 931-6.<br />
36. Villarreal LP, Witzany G. Viruses are essential agents within the roots and stem of the<br />
tree of life. J Theor Biol 2010: 262(4): 698-710.<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2
d by<br />
STRENGTH • ABSORBENCY • CONFIDENCE<br />
More to love about<br />
AQUACEL ® dressings<br />
NEW AQUACEL ®<br />
EXTRA dressing:<br />
• 9x stronger 1a<br />
• 39% more absorbent 1a<br />
• Manages a wide range of exudate levels<br />
AQUACEL ®<br />
Dressings<br />
TRIED. TRUE.<br />
Hydrofiber ® dressing with strengthening fiber<br />
TRUSTED. TM<br />
<br />
To find out more about AQUACEL ® EXTRA<br />
dressing, please visit www.convatec.com<br />
a As compared to original AQUACEL ® dressing.<br />
Reference: 1. Preliminary assessment of the physical properties of AQUACEL ® EXTRA TM and<br />
AQUACEL ® Dressings. Scientific Background Report. WHRI3461 TA214. 2011, Data on File,<br />
ConvaTec Inc.<br />
AQUACEL and Hydrofiber are registered trademarks of ConvaTec Inc.<br />
AQUACEL EXTRA and Tried. True. Trusted. are trademarks of ConvaTec Inc.<br />
© <strong>2012</strong> ConvaTec Inc. AP-011601-MM [AM/EM]
“ Highly absorbent – easy to use.”<br />
Vliwasorb ® adhesive<br />
The self-adhesive superabsorber<br />
NEW<br />
optimal treatment, especially of<br />
difficult-to-dress areas of the body<br />
better quality of life thanks to<br />
optimal exudate management<br />
high absorption and binding capacity<br />
www.Lohmann-Rauscher.com<br />
9503885 0412 e
Presented at<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> 2011<br />
Brussels · Belgium<br />
Developing evidence-based ways of working:<br />
Science, Practice and Education<br />
Employing interdisciplinary team<br />
working to improve patient outcomes in<br />
diabetic foot ulceration – our experience<br />
1. HISTORy AND INTRODUCTION<br />
The treatment of wounds is an ancient area of<br />
“specialization in medical practice”. Its origins<br />
trace to ancient Egypt and Greece. The most profound<br />
advances in the field came with the development<br />
of microbiology and cellular pathology<br />
in the 19 th century. In the 1870s, R.W Johnson,<br />
the cofounder of Johnson & Johnson, began the<br />
production of gauze and wound dressings with<br />
Iodine. In the late 19 th century P.L. Friedrich<br />
introduced the importance of wound excision, a<br />
procedure that reduced the risk of infection and<br />
thus surgery was on board….<br />
The diabetic clinic at the Deaconess Hospital in<br />
Boston can be considered as one of the first to<br />
instigate a multidisciplinary approach in diabetic<br />
wound care, bear in mind that the discovery of<br />
insulin was still a few years ahead! The teaching<br />
of diabetic foot care was considered so important<br />
that by 1928 they had assigned one graduate nurse<br />
and two pupil nurses to that duty. 1<br />
From the moment we use the term “specialization<br />
in different fields of wound care” we are<br />
already speaking about multidisciplinarity.<br />
2. DEFINITION OF A<br />
MULTIDISCIPLINARy TEAM<br />
We have found some different explanations/definitions<br />
of a multidisciplinary team:<br />
“…A group of people with different kinds of<br />
training and experience working together, usually<br />
on an ongoing basis. Professionals often use the<br />
word “discipline” to mean a field of study such<br />
as medicine, social work, or education…” (www.<br />
dwp.gov.uk department for work and pensions).<br />
“A group composed of members with varied<br />
but complementary experience, qualifications,<br />
and skills that contribute to the achievement of<br />
the organization’s specific objectives” (Oxford<br />
Dictionary).<br />
“A multidisciplinary team is composed of<br />
members from different healthcare professions<br />
with specialized skills and expertise. The members<br />
coordinate and communicate with each other to<br />
provide quality patient care. Coordination and<br />
teamwork among clinicians results in greater efficiency<br />
and improved clinical outcomes” (Journal<br />
of Healthcare Quality, March/April 2004). 2<br />
In our further work we try to clarify why the use<br />
of some words will play a major role and why<br />
perhaps the terminology of multidisciplinarity is<br />
not our favourite in our context of teams concerning<br />
wound care.<br />
3. WHy WE SHOULD USE<br />
INTERDISCIPLINARy IN THE CONTExT<br />
OF WOUND CARE?<br />
A two-step approach<br />
a. Difference between professionals and<br />
disciplines.<br />
We are privileged that an expert as respected as<br />
Paul Gorman wrote several articles and books<br />
about multidisciplinary teams. He helped us to<br />
understand the differences and nuances between<br />
professionals and disciplines. 3<br />
It’s fascinating to question why we have developed<br />
different disciplines in medicine. As human<br />
beings we have learnt that specialization enables<br />
us to know more about things. Receiving greater<br />
depth of knowledge will give us greater control<br />
over that part of our world and our environment.<br />
At the same time, other people have specialist<br />
knowledge about other things. Coming together<br />
we will have an even greater area of knowledge.<br />
Knowledge, but also status, reward and power, are<br />
divided by the boundaries of professions and disciplines.<br />
To demonstrate this Paul Gorman gave<br />
us the following examples: doctors get paid better<br />
than nurses and in some environments, have more<br />
status and power. Gender too plays a crucial role<br />
�<br />
Kristien Van Acker<br />
Diabetologist, Md, PhD<br />
Chimay, Rumst,<br />
Vice Chair DFP, IDF,<br />
Consultant Trop Inst<br />
Antwerp, Belgium<br />
Correspondence:<br />
stiebertje.viroin@<br />
gmail.com<br />
Conflict of interest: none<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 31
in the way professions operate internally and the way they<br />
interact with each other. This lead to defining the mission<br />
statements of the professional bodies (e.g. podiatry,<br />
chiropody and nursing); in history we see the development<br />
of professional bodies, acting as gatekeepers to the professions.<br />
Those bodies control the right to practice and will<br />
protect the public from charlatans, and this can only be<br />
seen as an advantage. However an individual, namely a patient,<br />
is not approached on a daily basis by the professional<br />
bodies but by medical teams. For this reason, it’s preferable<br />
to speak in terms of multidisciplinary teams (MTs) instead<br />
of multi-professional teams. In MTs members of staff, like<br />
auxiliaries, receptionists, and all the others also have a<br />
central role. Another important point is that the patients<br />
and their relatives have also a central place, which is not<br />
in the case in a multi professional team.<br />
b. Difference between multidisciplinary (MTs) and<br />
interdisciplinary teams (ITs)<br />
In 2007 Rebecca L Jessup from Australia was one of the<br />
first to adopt the concept of interdisciplinary teams and<br />
their skills and behavior 4 .<br />
According to Paul Gorman, MTs utilize the skills<br />
and experience of individuals from different disciplines,<br />
with each discipline approaching the patient from its own<br />
perspective. More often than not, this approach involves<br />
separate individual consultations. These may occur in a<br />
“onestopshop” fashion with all consultations occurring<br />
as part of a single appointment on a single day. It is common<br />
for this team to meet regularly, in the absence of the<br />
patient, to “case conference” findings and discuss future<br />
directions for the patient’s care. MTs provide more knowledge<br />
and experience than disciplines operating in isolation.<br />
ITs, however, integrate separate discipline approaches<br />
into a single consultation, i.e. the patienthistory taking.<br />
The team, together with the patient, conducts assessment,<br />
diagnosis, intervention and short and longterm management<br />
goals at the one time. The patient is intimately<br />
involved in any discussions regarding their condition or<br />
prognosis and the plans about their care. Individuals from<br />
different disciplines, as well as the patient themselves, are<br />
encouraged to question each other and explore alternate<br />
avenues, stepping out of discipline silos to work toward<br />
the best outcome for the patient. In these processes, family<br />
members and partners will also be involved in the plans<br />
about the care of their family member. Those who have<br />
experience in this approach will immediately recognize a<br />
personal expression: “working in the order of chaos!” The<br />
energy and general demands are huge but the rewards are<br />
great, and perhaps the most important benefit is the richness<br />
of the contacts of team members with the patients<br />
and their family with, in return, the confidence the patient<br />
gives back even when prognosis is poor.<br />
32<br />
4. WHAT CAN BE CONSIDERED AS<br />
“PRACTICAL” GOLDEN RULES<br />
For teambuilding and working in an interdisciplinary<br />
team? 5-9<br />
Noone anywhere can start such an Interdisciplinary Team<br />
Project without a respectable time of preparation and a<br />
clear concept of the project management in which he/she<br />
has to take at least four characteristics into account: definite<br />
duration, examine the logic relationship with other<br />
activities in the project, study the resource consumption<br />
of this team (information, energy, know how, time and<br />
financial resources) together with the associated costs. This<br />
means that at the very least, for longterm success, a person<br />
must develop a business plan and management skills.<br />
The initiative taker will define roles and boundaries.<br />
Everyone needs clarity on his/her own role and it has to<br />
be clear to each member what other team members do.<br />
The team coordinator has to be aware of power dynamics<br />
within the group, i.e. are certain members competing<br />
for control? Or do some have more status than others?<br />
The process of “taking decisions” must be analyzed on<br />
a constant basis in the team; how, who and when is important.<br />
Team members must learn to value each other’s<br />
contributions and look at how the group communicates.<br />
In addition, they have to be aware that “different professionals<br />
have different views” and that this is the added<br />
value of the concept.<br />
Implementation of feedback loops for selfevaluation<br />
is helpful in detecting some barriers and is of utmost importance<br />
to the success of ensuring members do not underestimate<br />
the value of listening to service users (patients).<br />
Often small details are huge barriers to team success. Some<br />
of the biggest barriers include unclear goals, unhealthy<br />
communication, playing it ‘safe’, individual goals and poor<br />
leadership.<br />
5. INTERDISCIPLINARy TEAMS IN DIABETIC<br />
FOOT WOUND CARE<br />
a. Rationale and evidenced based data<br />
One example of where building an interdisciplinary team<br />
is useful and effective is the diabetic foot team. We refer to<br />
the International Consensus of the Diabetic Foot, audited<br />
by Karel Bakker and first launched in 1996 and the fourth<br />
edition recently launched at the International Diabetic<br />
Foot Meeting in <strong>May</strong> 2011 in Noordwijkerhout 10 .<br />
In this consensus the following statements can be<br />
found: “If you have a foot problem, you should obtain<br />
foot care from a multidisciplinary foot team. A multidisciplinary<br />
approach has been shown to bring about a 4585%<br />
decrease in amputations”. This sounds impressive, so what<br />
are the references and the associated evidence?<br />
The first publication on multidisciplinary diabetic foot<br />
clinics was published in 1986 by Mike Edmonds in which<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2
he illustrated the improved survival of the diabetic foot<br />
and the role of a specialized foot clinic. 11 In 2005 Lavery<br />
LA published the outcome of a study of 2738 persons<br />
with diabetes carried out over 28 months. Stratification<br />
into low and highrisk groups was performed with the<br />
implementation of preventive or acute care protocols.<br />
The outcome was impressive: a 47% decrease of the incidence<br />
of amputations; 38% reduction in footrelated<br />
hospital admissions; 22% reduction of average hospital<br />
days and 70% reduction in SNF (skilled nursing facilities)<br />
admissions. 12 This model has been widely replicated; the<br />
group of Gerry Ryman 13 illustrated a significant reduction<br />
in total and major amputation rates in a defined U.K.<br />
population measured over an 11year period (19952005)<br />
following improvements in foot care services including<br />
multidisciplinary teamwork. Expressed as incidence per<br />
10,000 people with diabetes, total amputations fell 70%,<br />
from 53.2 to 16.0, and major amputations fell 82%, from<br />
36.4 to 6.7. This was also the result of a continuous prospective<br />
audit.<br />
b. How to establish a diabetic foot clinic<br />
Some years ago, the IWGDF convened a roundtable meeting<br />
to discuss the principles of organizing a diabetic foot<br />
clinic. We published these data in the Time to Act in the<br />
year of the “Diabetic Foot”, 2005 14 . The idea of the working<br />
group was to make a distinction between three models:<br />
The minimal model or basic model, the intermediate<br />
model, and the centres of excellence also called tertiary<br />
referral centres model. In practice, the gradual process<br />
towards excellence is initiated by a dedicated individual,<br />
a “local champion”, working in a very small team. More<br />
often than not, this person drives the project for many<br />
years and he or she assumes much of the responsibility<br />
from the start.<br />
Please visit the IWGDF website for more information: www.iwgdf.org<br />
Science, Practice and Education<br />
In Table 1 we present the three models and refer to<br />
the publication of Time to Act for more details. By accepting<br />
the concept of this “Three Level Model”, we are<br />
aware that referral patterns between these levels of care in<br />
this global organization must be clearly defined. This will<br />
only be possible if the organization in the country has a<br />
wellestablished centre of excellence. Good structures will<br />
have a positive influence on reducing delays in referrals!<br />
c. The importance of feedback loops and benchmarking:<br />
Quality control<br />
Delivery of good diabetic foot care is also dependent on<br />
the need for feedback and self reflection if we are to witness<br />
improvements in the performance of the teams which in<br />
turn lead to improvements in the delivery and outcome<br />
of the medical care 15 . To evaluate the input, or the intervention<br />
(e.g. “multidisciplinary diabetic foot clinic”)<br />
and the process itself we have to register the outcome<br />
parameters for our evaluation. There are many examples<br />
of such processes. One of the modern techniques used is<br />
benchmarking.<br />
One of the first important studies to compare differences<br />
by centre is the EURODIALE 1618 . In this study (a<br />
prospective cohort study of 1232 consecutive individuals)<br />
we learned that treatment of many patients is not in line<br />
with current guidelines and there are large differences between<br />
countries and centres. At study entry, 77% of the<br />
patients had inadequate or no offloading. During followup,<br />
casting was used in 35% (068% variation between<br />
countries!) of the plantar fore or midfoot ulcers. Vascular<br />
imaging was performed in 56% (1486%) of patients with<br />
severe limb ischemia; while revascularization was (only)<br />
performed in 43%.<br />
At the current moment only two countries, namely<br />
Germany and Belgium, are known to have this quality<br />
control system. In the diseasemanagement programme<br />
in Germany, providers are obliged to refer highrisk feet,<br />
ulceration and suspicion of diabetic osteoarthropathy to<br />
specialized diabetic foot clinics at predefined interfaces.<br />
Table 1: The Different Models of Diabetic Foot Care according to the IWGDF.<br />
Minimal Model Intermediate Model Maximal Model<br />
Staff Doctor/nurse or Doctor or General Physician<br />
Diabetologist/surgeon/rehabilitation<br />
podiatrist<br />
Surgeon<br />
specialist/microbiologist/dermatologist/<br />
Podiatrist and/Nurse<br />
Psychiatrist/nurse/educator/podiatrist/<br />
Orthotist<br />
casting technician/secretarial staff...<br />
Aim Prevention and basic Prevention and basic curative care for Prevention and specialized curative care<br />
curative care<br />
all types of patients and advanced assessment<br />
and diagnosis<br />
provide training for other centres<br />
Patients Own patients From the regional catchment area of National, regional or even international<br />
the hospital with possibly some referrals<br />
from outside the region<br />
reference centre<br />
Setting Small regional hospital, Hospital<br />
health centres<br />
Reference centre (Third line centre)<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 33<br />
�
Science, Practice and Education<br />
An interdisciplinary Diabetic Foot Team in action: Order in the Chaos. Diabetic Foot Clinic – Kristien Van Acker<br />
Standards of Quality for Specialized Diabetic Foot Clinics<br />
according to the Criteria of the Diabetic Foot Working<br />
Group of the German Diabetes Association (DDG) are<br />
based on Structural quality (equipment, documentation,<br />
and staff); Structural and Process quality (interdisciplinary<br />
cooperation by contract); Process quality (clinical<br />
pathways/standard operation procedures (SOP); Hygiene<br />
plans, (MRSA management plan); Audit (active and passive);<br />
and Quality of performance (treatment results of 30<br />
consecutive patients).<br />
In Belgium, some opinion leaders together with Scientific<br />
Institute of Public Health, Epidemiology in Brussels<br />
developed an “Initiative for Quality of Care Promotion<br />
and Epidemiology in Belgian Diabetic foot clinics”, the socalled<br />
IQED centres. This prospective study is designed to<br />
describe, evaluate and improve the Quality of Care in the<br />
Belgian diabetic foot clinics (DFC) by collecting data and<br />
providing benchmarking. In this study Offloading was<br />
used in 75% (variation from 42% to 100%) of the ulcer<br />
patients, but a total contact cast was only used in 2.4%.<br />
Of the patients with peripheral arterial disease, 42.8% underwent<br />
revascularization and 59.4% were hospitalized 19 .<br />
34<br />
6. GENERAL CONCLUSIONS AND THE<br />
CONCEPT OF INTERDISCIPLINARy TEAMS<br />
FOR INTEGRATED WOUND CARE<br />
In many countries and societies care facilities have come<br />
a long way in developing their wound care programs,<br />
especially where there is more effort towards an interdisciplinary<br />
approach. They have moved away from the<br />
approach of just having a single wound treatment nurse<br />
and established a more integrated care approach. The most<br />
successful teams are those that have a wound care team<br />
involving all key departments within the facility. In hospitals<br />
it starts with the medical director who facilitates<br />
the necessary patient medical workups as, for example, a<br />
therapy to apply specific services such as modalities and<br />
wound debridement, and dietary services to ensure that<br />
those with wounds have adequate nutritional intake. On<br />
the other hand, well skilled home nurses who provide<br />
primary patient care including wound dressings are also<br />
important key players. But in this advanced situation the<br />
key pitfall will be a good referral system and communication<br />
between the first, second and tertiary line teams.<br />
Ultimately, highly coordinated treatment plans are effective<br />
in reducing average wound healing times, thereby<br />
lessening patient suffering and costs of care.<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2
In this philosophy we must consider today integrating<br />
all the different “thematic” teams. Personally, I believe in<br />
an integration of teams specialized in wound care of diabetic<br />
foot ulcers, pressure ulcers, venous ulcers and others.<br />
This is already the case in some countries, such as the U.S.<br />
Finally, I would like to conclude that all worldwideknown<br />
diabetic foot clinics, the so called ‘Centres of<br />
Excellence’, were created one step at a time, beginning<br />
with the basic model. This paper has reported the experience<br />
of building one. This may be of use to those clinical<br />
personnel who are considering the effectiveness of their<br />
ways of working and the associated patient outcomes. We<br />
have reported improved patient outcomes following the<br />
implementation of this evidencebased model and would<br />
encourage others to consider employing this approach.<br />
‘A journey of a thousand miles begins with one step…’<br />
Lao Tzu, China, 6 th century m<br />
1. Joslin EP. The treatment of Diabetes Mellitus. Lea and Febiger: Philadelphia,<br />
PA, 2nd edn, 1917: 423-427; 4th edn, 1928: 785-802.<br />
2. Bernard J. Horak, PhD FACHE CPHQ; Joyce Pauig, RN; Ben Keidan, MD; Jennifer<br />
Kerns, MD. JHQ 141 - Patient Safety: A Case Study in Team Building and Interdisciplinary<br />
Collaboration. NAHQ, March/April 2004.<br />
3. Paul Gorman. “Managing multidisciplinary teams in the NHS”. 1989. ISBN 0 7494<br />
2787 6. Marston Lindsay Ross International Ltd, Oxfordshire.<br />
4. Jessup RL. Interdisciplinary versus multidisciplinary care teams: do we understand<br />
the difference? Australian Health review, August, 2007.<br />
5. Logan K RN. Diabetes-The role of the multidisciplinary team in patient self<br />
management. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2008. Diabetes Care. 2008.<br />
3 Suppl S12-S54.<br />
6. Multidisciplinary care. A model for achieving best practice cancer care.<br />
A Victorian Government Initiative. www.health.Vic.gov.au/cancer<br />
7. Fay D, BorrillC, Amir Z, et al. Getting the most out of multidisciplinary teams: a<br />
multi-sample study of team innovation in health care. Journal of occupational and<br />
Organizational Psychology, 2006<br />
8. Gorman P. Excellent information is needed for excellent care, but so is good<br />
communication. West j Med. 2000;172: 319-20.<br />
9. Jenkins VA, Fallowfield LJ, Poole K. Are members of multidisciplinary teams in breast<br />
cancer aware of each other’s informational roles? Quality in Health Care, 2001; 10:<br />
70-75.<br />
10. Nicolaas Schaper, William van Houtum, Andrew Boulton. Supplement: Proceedings<br />
of the 6th International Symposium on the Diabetic Foot, <strong>May</strong> 10–14, 2011,<br />
Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands.Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews,<br />
February <strong>2012</strong>,Volume 28, Issue Supplement S1, Pages 1–237<br />
11. Mike Edmonds . Improved survival of the diabetic foot: the role of a specialized foot<br />
clinic. Q J Med. 1986;232:763-771<br />
12. Lavery LA, Wunderlich RP, Tredwell JL. Disease management for the diabetic foot:<br />
effectiveness of a diabetic foot prevention program to reduce amputations and<br />
hospitalizations. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2005 Oct;70(1):31-7.<br />
13. Singhan K, Fiona N, Neil Baker, et al. Reduction in diabetic amputations over<br />
11 years in a defined U.K. population. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:99-101.<br />
14. Time to Act. Put feet first, prevent amputations: diabetes and foot care. Joint<br />
publication of the International Diabetes Federation and the International Working<br />
Group on the Diabetic Foot.2005<br />
15. Edmonds ME. The Diabetic Foot, 2003. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2004; 20 Suppl 1/<br />
S9-S12.<br />
16. Prompers L, Huijberts M, Apelqvist J, et al High prevalence of ischaemia, infection<br />
and serious comorbidity in patients with diabetic foot disease in Europe. Baseline<br />
results from the Eurodiale study. Diabetologia. 2007 Jan;50(1):18-25.<br />
17. Prompers L, Huijberts M, Apelqvist J, et al Optimal organization of health care in<br />
diabetic foot disease: introduction to the Eurodiale study. Int J Low Extrem Wounds.<br />
2007 Mar;6 (1):11-7.<br />
18. Prompers L, Huijberts M, Apelqvist J, et al. Delivery of care to diabetic patients with<br />
foot ulcers in daily practice: results of the Eurodiale Study, a prospective cohort<br />
study. Diabet Med. 2008 Jun;25(6):700-7.<br />
19. Billiet, A., Debacker, N., Beele, H., Daubresse, C., Deschamps, K., Deweer, S.,<br />
Lauwers, P., Matricali, G., Nobels, F., Randon, C., Wanyama, S. (2009). Resultaten.<br />
In: Billiet A., Debacker N., Nobels F., Van Acker K., Van Casteren V. (Eds.),<br />
IKED-voet Initiatief voor kwaliteitsbevordering en epidemiologie bij multidisciplinaire<br />
diabetes voetklinieken. (pp. 11-40). Brussels:Wetenschappelijk Instituut Volksgezondheid.<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2<br />
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy<br />
ATMOS S 042 NPWT *<br />
We counteract the barriers for you! –<br />
user friendly, self-explanatory, reliable<br />
ATMOS S 041 Wound<br />
Now the choice is yours –<br />
the combined talent from ATMOS for the small budget!<br />
ATMOS MedizinTechnik GmbH & Co. KG<br />
Ludwig-Kegel-Str. 12, 14-16, 18<br />
79853 Lenzkirch / Germany<br />
Tel: +49 7653 689-374 | Fax: +49 7653 68986-374<br />
ApplicationSolutions@atmosmed.de<br />
MedizinTechnik<br />
www.atmosmed.com<br />
*Currently not available in all countries
Science, Practice and Education<br />
Dr Jessica Walburn 1<br />
John Weinman 1<br />
Suzanne Scott 2<br />
Kavita Vedhara 3<br />
1 Institute of Psychiatry,<br />
Department of Psychology,<br />
King’s College London<br />
2 Dental Institute,<br />
Department of Dental<br />
Practice and Policy, King’s<br />
College London<br />
3 Institute of Work,<br />
Health and Organisations,<br />
University of Nottingham<br />
Correspondence:<br />
jessicawalburn@<br />
hotmail.com<br />
Conflict of interest: none<br />
36<br />
Exploring the characteristics of a venous<br />
leg ulcer that contribute to the emotional<br />
distress experienced by patients<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) are a common chronic<br />
wound whose prevalence increases with age. A<br />
number of studies across quantitative and qualitative<br />
literature have found that living with an<br />
ulcer can have a detrimental impact on healthrelated<br />
quality of life (HRQoL) and elicit emotional<br />
distress. Jones, Robinson, Barr & Carlisle,<br />
(2006) reported that anxiety and depression were<br />
positively associated with pain and malodour in<br />
a survey of 190 patients with VLUs. This study<br />
explored the negative emotions associated with<br />
living with an ulcer and investigated the factors<br />
that underpinned this distress.<br />
METHODS<br />
Design: A cross sectional design was used whereby<br />
a series of indepth semistructured interviews<br />
were conducted to explore distress, the lived experience<br />
of having an ulcer, coping strategies, patients’<br />
beliefs about their ulcer and its treatment,<br />
and the impact on HRQoL.<br />
Participants: This study had 14 participants being<br />
treated in primary care leg ulcer clinics (Edgware<br />
Community Hospital, Ravenscroft Medical Centre,<br />
Vale Drive Primary Care Centre, Forest Primary<br />
Care Centre) diagnosed with a VLU without<br />
type II diabetes and taking part in a prospective<br />
quantitative study investigating the determinants<br />
of healing. At the time of interview four participants<br />
had an open ulcer.<br />
Analysis: A thematic analysis of the interviews<br />
was conducted using Framework Analysis (Ritchie<br />
& Spencer, 1994). Framework analysis involves<br />
the organisation and interpretation of information<br />
using a matrix or chart (Ritchie, Spencer, &<br />
O’Connor, 2006). This approach was selected as<br />
it easily enables comparison across participants and<br />
themes. The quality and consistency of the analysis<br />
was assessed by two independent researchers.<br />
References<br />
Jones, J.E., Robinson, J., Barr, W. & Carlisle,<br />
C. (2008). Impact of exudate and odour from<br />
chronic venous leg ulceration. Nursing Standard,<br />
22(45), 53-4, 56, 58, 60-1.<br />
Ritchie, J. & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data<br />
analysis for applied policy research. In A. Bryman<br />
& P.G. Burgess (Eds.). Analysing Qualitative Data<br />
(pp.173-194). London: Routledge.<br />
Presented at<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> 2011<br />
Brussels · Belgium<br />
RESULTS<br />
All participants described experiencing distress<br />
associated with their ulcer. This was expressed<br />
in terms of feeling depressed, angry, anxious,<br />
ashamed and embarrassed. Dominant themes<br />
associated with distress included: symptomatology<br />
– pain, exudate and malodour; uncertainty<br />
related to ulcer duration and outcome; intrinsic<br />
revulsion at the appearance of the ulcer; dislike<br />
of the compression bandages used to treat the<br />
ulcer because of how they looked and how they<br />
limited general mobility and other activities; social<br />
impact of the ulcer relating to concerns about the<br />
reactions of others to the appearance and smell of<br />
the ulcer; strategies used to camouflage the compression<br />
bandage (e.g., always wearing trousers in<br />
warm weather) and manage the malodour (e.g.,<br />
avoidance of unnecessary contact with others);<br />
negative perceptions of the appearance of the ulcer<br />
scar; concern about ulcer recurrence.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
These findings highlight the range of negative<br />
emotions experienced by patients associated with<br />
having a VLU and are consistent with previous<br />
research. Although patients described a variety of<br />
factors related to their distress, appearancerelated<br />
issues and concerns about the reactions of others<br />
were particularly significant. Quantitative research<br />
is now required to establish the prevalence of these<br />
concerns in a larger sample. In terms of improving<br />
patient wellbeing, this research highlights<br />
the variety of factors that could be contributing<br />
to emotional distress for patients living with a<br />
venous leg ulcer.<br />
Thank you to the patients and staff of Edgware<br />
Community Hospital, Ravenscroft Medical<br />
Centre, Vale Drive Primary Care Centre, Forest<br />
Primary Care Centre (Barnet and Enfield PCTs)<br />
for taking part and assisting with this research. m<br />
Ritchie, J., Spencer, L. & O’Connor, W. (2006).<br />
Carrying out Qualitative Analysis. In J. Ritchie &<br />
J. Lewis (Eds.). Qualitative Research Practice: A<br />
Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers<br />
(pp. 219-262). London: Sage Publication.<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2
Finally closed.<br />
sorbion – the future in modern wound care.<br />
<strong>May</strong> <strong>24</strong>, <strong>2012</strong> | 11:15 – 12:15 am | Room E1<br />
Health Economics –<br />
The key driver for decision making in wound care?<br />
Roy Lilley (Chair)<br />
Independent health policy analyst, writer, broadcaster<br />
and commentator, Surrey, United Kingdom<br />
Prof. Julian Guest<br />
Kings College London, United Kingdom<br />
Prof. Jan Apelqvist<br />
University Hospital of Malmö, Sweden<br />
Dr. Bernhard Lange-Asschenfeldt<br />
Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany<br />
Prof. Matthias Augustin<br />
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
Visit us at<br />
stand 33<br />
and xl16<br />
www.sorbion.com AG-BS-1671-03/12
Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers<br />
in a new light.<br />
Discover an innovative range<br />
of wound management, medical<br />
skin care and compression<br />
products which reliably cover<br />
all stages of wound healing.<br />
Especially developed for the<br />
Cutimed ®<br />
A D VA N C E D W O U N D C A R E<br />
successful treatment of chronic,<br />
difficult-to-heal-wounds, such<br />
as venous leg ulcers, our<br />
range offers a complete selection<br />
of effective and patientfriendly<br />
products.<br />
On request, we will provide you<br />
with further information on<br />
indications and treatment<br />
options. Contact us:<br />
www.cutimed.com<br />
Cutimed ® PROTECT Cutimed ® Sorbact ® Cutimed ® Siltec JOBST ® Comprifore JOBST ® UlcerCARE
Development of a wound healing<br />
index for chronic wounds<br />
SUMMARy<br />
Objectives: to systematically review the literature<br />
on healing measurement tools. To develop<br />
a scale for measuring progress towards healing for<br />
chronic wounds.<br />
Material and methods: the study was conducted<br />
in two phases:<br />
Phase 1: Systematic review in major databases<br />
of health sciences (MEDLINE, CINAHL,<br />
WIDEN, SCIELO, LILACS, COCHRANE,<br />
IME) from the start of the database until 2009.<br />
Search strategy: instrument, tool, ulcer, chronic<br />
wound, healing, assessment, validation, reliability,<br />
and the same in Spanish, with their corresponding<br />
formulations using Booleans AND, OR and truncation<br />
term for some of them. The search took<br />
place initially in the thesauri and if the word did<br />
not exist, in free text. Study design not was taken.<br />
GRADE system was used to quality appraisal.<br />
Phase 2: modified Delphi study with a group<br />
of experts in chronic wounds, to reach consensus<br />
on variables that could measure the dimension<br />
of “progress towards healing”. In the first round<br />
started with all variables of the wound and the<br />
patient found in the different instruments of the<br />
systematic review. In the second round sent the<br />
items that had obtained the highest score. Finally<br />
sent the final version and experts were asked to<br />
rate on a scale of 1 to 4 to obtain the content<br />
validity index (CVI). Those variables that had<br />
obtained more than 80% CVI were included.<br />
Results: the systematic review revealed a number<br />
of 8 healing tools as set out in 20 articles (10 articles<br />
about PUSH, 3 PSST, 1 DESIGN, 1 PWAT,<br />
1 Sessing Scale, 1 Scale Sussman, 1 WHS, COD<br />
ED 1, and finally, a literature review to collect 4 of<br />
the above). Regardless of the number of items per<br />
scale, scale PSST has the best research on validity<br />
and reliability. However, most are for pressure ulcers.<br />
Only 4 papers studied validity and reliability<br />
of scales (PUSH, PSST, DESIGN and CODED).<br />
The only scale that has been validated for venous<br />
ulcers has also been the PUSH, in English and<br />
Portuguese. The only scale found in Spanish is<br />
coded, developed in the Basque Country in 2000,<br />
but only presents a partial survey. That is why they<br />
decided to develop a “de novo” scale for all types<br />
of chronic wounds.<br />
The scale developed, receives the provisional<br />
name of “RESVECH V1.0. Expected results of<br />
the assessment and evolution in the healing of<br />
chronic wounds”. CVI scores obtained by the<br />
experts above 80% on all items compose. Is<br />
defined, pending the study of validity and reliability,<br />
9 items: size of the lesion, depth/tissue<br />
concerned, edges, maceration, perilesional, tunneling,<br />
type of tissue in the wound bed, exudate,<br />
infection/inflammation, frequency of pain (in last<br />
10 days). The scale is scored numerically and can<br />
score ranging from 0 to 40 points, wound healed<br />
and the worst possible lesion respectively. Also<br />
accompanied by operational definitions of each<br />
item and its valueform.<br />
Conclusions: we get a scale with, a priori, content<br />
validity by expert’s assessment.<br />
Key words: Wound healing assessment, measurement<br />
tools, nursing, chronic wounds.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
From the beginning, medicine has always had two<br />
basic aims: relieving pain and healing wounds.<br />
Because of this, throughout the years the health<br />
sciences have little by little stimulated their ability<br />
to create new options for treatment and care 1 .<br />
Historically, wounds and strategies for healing<br />
them quickly have been linked to human progress,<br />
and this gave rise to an almost infinite range of<br />
treatment methods. It would be nearly impossible<br />
to mention the great number of products<br />
and agents put forward as beneficial for healing<br />
wounds, from the most ordinary to the most esoteric<br />
of substances thought to speed up the healing<br />
process. For example: gentian violet, scarlet<br />
red, Peruvian balm, cod liver oil and zinc sulfate,<br />
among many others 2 . Most of the times the ultimate<br />
goal was to prevent the occurrence of the<br />
muchfeared infection. But when it did occur,<br />
fire was used to purify and cauterize wounds. The<br />
discovery of healing in a moist environment by<br />
�<br />
Science, Practice and Education<br />
Juan Carlos<br />
Restrepo-Medrano<br />
PhD, MSc Nurs, BSc Nurs<br />
Universidad de Antioquia.<br />
Medellín, Columbia<br />
José Verdú Soriano<br />
PhD, MSc Nurs, BSc Nurs,<br />
DUE -RN<br />
Universidad de Alicante.<br />
Alicante, Spain<br />
Correspondence:<br />
jcrm6@alu.ua.es<br />
This paper received the<br />
GNEAUPP-Convatec SL<br />
Sergio Juan Jordán<br />
Memorial Award for<br />
the best scientific paper<br />
presented at the 8th<br />
National Symposium on<br />
Pressure Ulcers and<br />
Chronic Wounds.<br />
Santiago de Compostela.<br />
November 2010.<br />
First published in<br />
GEROKOMOS 2011;<br />
Vol. 22, no 4<br />
Conflict of interest: none<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 39
Dr. Winter 3,4 was a revolution that led to a wide range of<br />
advanced products for healing purposes.<br />
Despite all the above and the breakthroughs in healthcare<br />
systems, diagnostic methods and the assessment<br />
and wound healing have not developed in the same way<br />
through time. Healing is a process that has not been properly<br />
approached in the case of wounds, especially chronic<br />
wounds (CW). These lesions have not generally been of<br />
interest to healthcare professionals, who have always<br />
considered them to be normal and inevitable in certain<br />
conditions 5 , an attitude responsible for a certain kind of<br />
lethargy in carrying out studies and research in this field.<br />
Nonetheless, in recent years interest around these lesions<br />
has gradually grown, focusing not only on appropriate<br />
treatment but also on optimal preventive care 6 .<br />
CW require continuous, direct care to prevent them<br />
from occurring and/or healing them, which involves perseverance<br />
on the part of both direct and indirect caregivers.<br />
Adopting such an approach considerably increases<br />
the care burden and leads to remarkably higher direct and<br />
indirect costs in healthcare services. The World Health<br />
Organization (WHO) considers the presence of some of<br />
these CW a measure of patient care quality 7 . Such is the<br />
case of pressure ulcers (PU), which are thought to show<br />
poorquality patient care.<br />
Few tools have been developed to measure the progress of<br />
chronic wound healing, and these have generally focused<br />
on a specific type of wound: PU. Some of the tools proposed<br />
for assessing the healing process of PU are:<br />
– the PSST scale (Pressure Sore Status Tool) 8,9,10 ,<br />
– the PUSH scale (Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing) 11 ,<br />
– the Sussman scale (Sussman Wound Healing<br />
Tool) 12 ,<br />
– the Sessing scale 13 ,<br />
– the WHS scale (Wound Healing Scale) 14 ,<br />
– the PWAT scale (Photographic Wound Assessment<br />
Tool ) 15 ,<br />
– the CODED scale 16<br />
– the DESIGN scale 17 .<br />
Little research has been carried out with these tools, and<br />
the methods used have varied enormously, to the extent<br />
that it becomes difficult to establish their validity and<br />
reliability. Some are widely used, even for wounds they<br />
were not designed for, perhaps owing to the power of<br />
individuals or scientific groups who wanted to see them<br />
become a reality. Such is the case of PUSH, developed<br />
by the NPUAP.<br />
In practice therefore, clinicians are using these scales to<br />
assess changes in wounds, but evidence needs to be gathered<br />
to show that a scale has been validated and to make<br />
it possible not only to evaluate the process of CW healing<br />
40<br />
but also the effectiveness of our intervention. Given the<br />
foregoing, a reliable, valid tool would be needed to assess<br />
and describe the current status of the CW and determine<br />
whether it is progressing toward healing or worsening.<br />
OBJECTIVE<br />
n Systematic review of the literature on tools for measuring<br />
healing to determine whether there is a valid,<br />
reliable index or scale for all types of CW.<br />
n Adapting and/or developing a scale to measure the<br />
healing process of all types of CW.<br />
MATERIAL AND METHOD<br />
This study was carried out in two phases:<br />
Phase 1: This stage involved a systematic review of publications<br />
in the scientific literature that deal with the subject<br />
of scales and/or tools for measuring wound healing. The<br />
most relevant health and social science databases were<br />
used: MEDLINE (PubMed), CINHAL, Web of Science,<br />
LILACS, Sociological Abstracts, CUIDEN, EMBASE,<br />
PsycInfo and ISI Web of Knowledge. The words included<br />
in the search strategy were: instrument, tool, ulcer, chronic<br />
wound, healing, assessment, validation, reliability, and their<br />
equivalents in Spanish, using Boolean AND, OR operators<br />
and the truncation term for some of them. In order<br />
to find articles more precisely, the initial search for a term<br />
was conducted in database thesauri and, when this was not<br />
possible, it was used as free text. The search was limited<br />
to paper titles and abstracts. The search period went from<br />
the start of each database up to December 2009.<br />
The inclusion criteria for selecting articles required that the<br />
development or analysis of a wound healing tool and/or<br />
scale be included in the objectives or hypothesis (the study<br />
design was not taken into account for inclusion). The<br />
exclusion criteria were: articles with no abstract available,<br />
editorials, papers presented at conferences, book reviews<br />
and animal studies.<br />
Articles were initially selected by pertinence of the title<br />
and abstract. The full text of articles chosen in this manner<br />
was analyzed to decide whether they should be included<br />
in the review. The GRADE system was used to evaluate<br />
the quality of publications. Information of interest for<br />
the study was extracted by means of an ad hoc chart that<br />
collected information on the general characteristics of the<br />
studies, the scale analyzed and the main results.<br />
Phase 2: After completing the systematic review and establishing<br />
the scales found in the literature, it was decided<br />
whether it would be feasible to adapt a tool to make it valid<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2
and reliable for all CW or whether it would be better to<br />
develop a de novo tool.<br />
If it were decided to adapt a scale or tool already developed,<br />
the method of translation/backtranslation of the<br />
tool would be used and subsequently its cultural adaptation<br />
to the Spanish language.<br />
In the case of developing a de novo index, the prior studies<br />
found would be taken into account to define the variables<br />
that could describe CW healing. This first draft of the<br />
index would undergo a content validity process involving<br />
a consensus of experts using a modified Delphi method.<br />
A group of 10 CW experts would evaluate the questionnaire<br />
to determine whether the tool would respond to the<br />
construct of “progress toward healing”.<br />
A modified tworound Delphi method was used to<br />
obtain the value of the content validity index (CVI). The<br />
experts scored the list of items twice, first the initial version<br />
of 12 items and then a final version with the items<br />
included and their rating categories. This method ensures<br />
that the scores will be based on the judgment of each<br />
expert and not be influenced by external factors, such as<br />
power relations, personal sympathies, desire to please or<br />
not to feel in a minority, for example. This is achieved by<br />
scoring the items in two rounds.<br />
The content validity was determined by a panel of experts<br />
as described by Polit and Hungler 18 based on two criteria:<br />
pertinence, i.e., the item evaluates what it purports to<br />
evaluate; and relevance, defined as the item’s significance<br />
in evaluating healing. The following scale was used:<br />
n Pertinence: 1) not pertinent 2) somewhat pertinent,<br />
3) pertinent, 4) very pertinent<br />
n Relevance: 1) not relevant, 2) somewhat relevant,<br />
3) relevant, 4) very relevant.<br />
Three calculations are made to determine content validity<br />
with this method:<br />
n Content validity index for each item in the tool<br />
(CVIi), calculated with the following formula:<br />
Number of experts agreeing on the value of<br />
relevance or pertinence of each item<br />
(values between 3 and 4)<br />
Total number of experts<br />
n Content validity index for each expert (CVIe),<br />
by the following formula:<br />
Number of items scored between<br />
3 and 4 by an expert<br />
Total number of items<br />
n General content validity index for the tool<br />
(CVItotal):<br />
Sum of all experts’ individual CVI<br />
Number of experts<br />
A CVI of 0.80 or higher in any of the three above areas<br />
was considered indicative of high content validity 18 , and<br />
the minimum value required would be 0.62 according to<br />
Lawshe 19 for a panel of 10 experts.<br />
RESULTS<br />
Phase 1<br />
The article search and selection process is summarized in<br />
Figure 1. Eight wound healing scales were identified in the<br />
20 articles included in the review (10 articles on PUSH,<br />
three on PSST, one on DESIGN, one on PWAT, one<br />
on the Sessing Scale, one on the Sussman Scale, one on<br />
WHS, one on CODED and, finally, a literature review<br />
that included four of the above).<br />
The main characteristics of the scales found were: PSST<br />
which evaluates 13 wound categories 8,9,10 ; the PUSH tool<br />
developed by the NPUAP that combines only three wound<br />
categories 11 ; the Sussman Wound Healing Tool 12 , a scale<br />
of 10 dichotomous categories; the Sessing Scale which<br />
is a modified classification system with six categories 13 ;<br />
Articles with no abstract<br />
available:<br />
6<br />
Articles identified:<br />
59<br />
Articles included<br />
in the study:<br />
20<br />
Editorials,<br />
conference papers,<br />
book reviews,<br />
different languages:<br />
6<br />
Articles on scales<br />
other than healing:<br />
23 Articles aimed<br />
at animal wounds:<br />
4<br />
Repeated articles:<br />
3<br />
Total articles excluded:<br />
39<br />
Fig. 1. Literature review process. Articles included and excluded.<br />
Science, Practice and Education<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 41<br />
�
<strong>EWMA</strong> DOCUMENTS<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Documents on Debridement and Antimicrobials<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> are producing two documents in <strong>2012</strong>:<br />
The <strong>EWMA</strong> Document on Antimicrobials aims to meet<br />
the on-going discussion across Europe concerning the<br />
consequences of a biological mutation of infections<br />
and the subsequent potential resistance to current<br />
wound treatment. The document will describe the<br />
related aspects of antiseptic, antibiotic treatment and<br />
other relevant treatment methods.<br />
In <strong>May</strong> 2010 the following <strong>EWMA</strong> Document was published:<br />
Outcomes in controlled and comparative studies on<br />
non healing wounds<br />
– Recommendations to improve quality of evidence<br />
in wound management<br />
The document is written by members of the <strong>EWMA</strong> Patient<br />
Outcome Group, based on common discussions in the group.<br />
The document has been summaried in a pixi version.<br />
In <strong>2012</strong>-2013 the Patient Outcome Group is working<br />
on a set of clinical study guidelines on non healing<br />
wounds. With these guidelines the group aims to<br />
support the recommendations included in the 2010<br />
POG document on evidence and outcomes.<br />
The guidelines will include a checklist with relevant<br />
research questions, frequent mistakes and links to<br />
other relevant sources of information.<br />
Other <strong>EWMA</strong> documents e.g. Position Documents<br />
can be downloaded from www.ewma.org<br />
The <strong>EWMA</strong> document on Debridement aim<br />
to provide an updated overview of the various<br />
debridement options. It will offer a clarification<br />
of the principal role of debridement and define<br />
the possibilities and limitations for standard<br />
and new debridement options.<br />
Outcomes in controlled<br />
and comparative studies<br />
on non-healing wounds<br />
Recommendations to improve the quality<br />
of evidence in wound management<br />
A <strong>EWMA</strong> Patient Outcome Group Document<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> front cover.indd 5 20/5/10 13:14:26<br />
For further details contact:<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Secretariat,<br />
Nordre Fasanvej 113,<br />
2000 Frederiksberg,<br />
Denmark<br />
Tel: +45 7020 0305<br />
Fax: +45 7020 0315<br />
ewma@ewma.org
the Wound Healing Scale, combining the four classification<br />
stages with eight modifiers 14 . The only scale found in<br />
Spanish was CODED, developed in the Basque Country<br />
in 2000, but only a partial study was found 16 . The most recent<br />
is the DESIGN scale, consisting of seven categories 17 .<br />
The PUSH tool is the most commonly used by clinicians,<br />
although the PSST is the one appearing most often in<br />
studies of its measurement properties and application in<br />
clinical practice which accredit its quality 8,9,10,11 , but its<br />
complexity in clinical use is evidenced by practitioners<br />
themselves.<br />
Table 1. Content validity of each item<br />
Item Content validity<br />
1. Wound size 1<br />
2. Depth/tissues involved 0.90<br />
3. Edges 0.80<br />
4. Perilesional maceration 0.80<br />
5. Tunneling 0.90<br />
6. Type of tissue in the wound bed 0.90<br />
7. Exudate 1<br />
8. Infection/inflammation (biofilm signs) 0.90<br />
9. Incidence of pain 0.90<br />
The PUSH tool, in contrast to PSST, is a much quicker,<br />
more reliable scale to monitor the status and progress of<br />
wounds through time, but the procedures used in developing<br />
it are not clear in the literature. Even so, it has been<br />
commonly used in the USA since it first appeared.<br />
In Spain the GNEAUPP translated this tool into Spanish<br />
and adopted it 20 after authorization by the NPUAP,<br />
but no studies on the adaptation, validity and reliability<br />
of this tool have yet been carried out in Spain. The DE<br />
SIGN scale is the most recent tool for assessing the healing<br />
process, but there is only one published study that looks<br />
at its validity and reliability 17 , involving interobserver<br />
reliability and in comparison with PSST to determine<br />
its validity. Although the reliability and validity of this<br />
tool are highly rated, the authors themselves point out<br />
the need for more studies on the scale in other contexts<br />
and other types of wounds. So far there is no record of<br />
any such studies.<br />
Regardless of the number of articles per scale, PSST is the<br />
one with the best research on validity and reliability. Nevertheless,<br />
most are measurement tools exclusively for PU.<br />
Validity and reliability studies have been carried out for<br />
only four scales (PUSH, PSST, DESIGN and CODED).<br />
The only scale validated also for venous ulcers is PUSH,<br />
in English and Portuguese 11,21 , which leads to the conclusion<br />
that there is no scale suitable for the reliable, valid<br />
assessment of healing in all CW.<br />
Phase 2<br />
It was decided to develop a healing progress index. Therefore,<br />
the systematic review was used also to determine what<br />
items should be included in developing the new scale.<br />
Existing scales were reviewed and some of their items were<br />
included in the initial drafts. This resulted in a lengthy list<br />
of items related to the healing process, and it was decided<br />
that the new scale should include only those items that<br />
would potentially change throughout the healing process.<br />
The outcome was a pencilandpaper tool consisting of<br />
12 variables: size/area/dimension, depth/tissues involved,<br />
edges, perilesional area, tunneling, wound history, baseline<br />
conditions, type and amount of tissue, exudate, infection/<br />
inflammation (biofilm signs), treatment and pain. As mentioned<br />
in the section on Material and Method, the experts<br />
scored the item list twice, first in the initial 12item version<br />
and then in a final version with 9 items and their rating<br />
categories. The CVIi results are summarized in Table 1.<br />
The CVIe results demonstrated high content validity<br />
for the most part, with scores of 0.80 or higher; some<br />
even received the maximum CVI score (Table 2). The<br />
CVItotal score was above 0.90, which indicates that the<br />
questionnaire items measure a specific domain, based on<br />
the scientific literature related to the evaluation of CW<br />
healing, guaranteeing the general content validity. The<br />
final outcome based on the foregoing and the CVI with<br />
scores above 0.80 given by the experts for all the items<br />
making up the de novo scale for all types of CW, was an<br />
index with the provisional name of “RESVECH V1.0. Results<br />
expected from the assessment and healing progress of<br />
chronic wounds”, pending a study of validity and reliability<br />
(Annex 1). It contains nine items: wound dimensions,<br />
depth/tissues involved, edges, perilesional maceration,<br />
tunneling, type of tissue in the wound bed, exudate, infection/inflammation<br />
(biofilm signs), pain frequency (in the<br />
past 10 days). The scale is scored numerically between 0<br />
Table 2. Individual validity index for each expert (CVI-e)<br />
Expert panelist<br />
Number of items<br />
scored between<br />
3 and 4<br />
Content validity<br />
CVI-3 (according to<br />
formula)<br />
Expert 1 8 0.80<br />
Expert 2 8 0.80<br />
Expert 3 8 0.80<br />
Expert 4 9 1<br />
Expert 5 8 0.80<br />
Expert 6 8 0.80<br />
Expert 7 8 0.80<br />
Expert 8 8 0.80<br />
Expert 9 9 1<br />
Expert 10 9 1<br />
Science, Practice and Education<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 43<br />
�
Science, Practice and Education<br />
(wound healed) and 40 points (worst possible condition).<br />
Additionally, operational definitions are provided for each<br />
item, as well as the way of assessing them (Annex 1).<br />
CONCLUSIONS<br />
The systematic review confirmed that there is little research<br />
on multidimensional tools for measuring healing<br />
and more research is needed.<br />
The RESVECH 1.0 index showed face value for the<br />
clarity and ease of understanding of each item by the experts<br />
who took part in the study. The overall content validity<br />
index (CVItotal) was 0.98, greater than the required<br />
minimum of 0.62 according to Lawshe for a panel of ten<br />
experts, which ensures the content validity according to<br />
the scientific literature relative to items for assessing the<br />
healing process.<br />
The validation process evidenced that this is a short<br />
scale, and it is pending further analysis according to experts<br />
and study population, comparing it with a disciplinary<br />
theory.<br />
The index entitled “RESVECH V1.0. Results expected<br />
from the assessment and healing progress of chronic<br />
wounds” is the first measurement tool applicable to chronic<br />
wounds of all types and of any etiology that can be used<br />
from the time the chronic wound is detected until healing<br />
process is complete. It may undergo different types of validation<br />
procedures to determine whether it measures what<br />
it purports to measure, which emphasizes the significance<br />
of continuing the improvement process.<br />
In general, it can be concluded that the quantitative analysis<br />
of the questionnaire shows that its content is valid both<br />
in terms of pertinence and relevance.<br />
BIBLIOGRAPHy<br />
1. Calderón W. Historia de la cirugía plástica mundial.<br />
Cirugía Plástica. Santiago. Sociedad de Cirujanos de<br />
Chile 2001; 19-27.<br />
2. Ladin D. Understanding wound dressings. Cl Plast<br />
Surg 1998; 25: 433-41.<br />
3. Winter GD. Formation of the Scab and the rate of<br />
epithelisation of superficial wounds in the skin of the<br />
young domestic pig. Nature 1962; 293 (4812):<br />
293-4.<br />
4. Winter GD, Scales JT. Effect of air drying and<br />
dressings on the surface of a wound. Nature 1963;<br />
197 (4862): 91-2.<br />
5. Grupo de Trabajo sobre Úlceras Vasculares de la<br />
AEEV. Consenso sobre Úlceras Vasculares y Pie<br />
Diabético de la AEEV. Guía de Práctica Clínica.<br />
Marzo 2004.<br />
6. Grupo Nacional para el Estudio y Asesoramiento en<br />
Úlceras por Presión y Heridas Crónicas. Mesa de<br />
debate: “Las úlceras por presión, un reto para el<br />
sistema de salud y la sociedad. Repercusiones a nivel<br />
epidemiológico, ético, económico y legal”. Madrid.<br />
Barcelona. Logroño: GNEAUPP, 2003.<br />
7. Gutiérrez FF. Prevenir las úlceras por presión es<br />
garantizar la calidad asistencial. Enfermería Científica<br />
1993; 140: 7-10.<br />
8. Bates-Jensen B. New pressure ulcer status tool.<br />
Decubitus 1990; 3 (3): 14-5.<br />
44<br />
9. Bates-Jensen BM, Vredevoe DL, Brecht ML. Validity<br />
and reliability of the Pressure Sore Status Tool.<br />
Decubitus 1992; 5 (6): 20-8.<br />
10. Bates-Jensen BM. The pressure sore status tool: an<br />
outcome measure for pressure sores. Top Geriatric<br />
Rehabil 1994; 9 (4): 17-34.<br />
11. Thomas DR, Rodeheaver GT, Bartolucci AA, Franz<br />
RA, Sussman C, Ferrell BA, Cuddigan J, Stotts NA,<br />
Maklebust J. Pressure ulcer scale for healing:<br />
derivation and validation of the PUSH tool. The<br />
PUSH Task Force. Adv Wound Care 1997; 10 (5):<br />
96-101.<br />
12. Utility of the Sussman Wound Healing Tool in<br />
predicting wound healing outcomes in physical<br />
therapy. Adv Wound Care 1997; 10 (5): 74-7.<br />
13. Ferrell BA, Artinian BM, Sessing D. The Sessing Scale<br />
for assessment of pressure ulcer healing. Journal of<br />
the American Geriatric Society 1995; 43: 37-40.<br />
14. Krasner D. Wound Healing Scale, version 1.0: A<br />
proposal. Adv Wound Care 1997; 10 (5): 82-5.<br />
15. Houghton PE, Kincaid CB, Campbell KE, Woodbury<br />
MG, Keast DH. Photographic assessment of the<br />
appearance of chronic pressure and leg ulcers.<br />
Ostomy/Wound Manage 2000; 46 (4): 20-30.<br />
16. Emparanza JL, Aranegui P, Ruiz M y cols. A simple<br />
Severity index for pressure ulcers. Journal of Wound<br />
Care 2000: 9 (2): 86-90.<br />
RESVECH SCALE V1.0 (SEE ANNEx 1.)<br />
Scale of results from assessment and<br />
progress of wound healing<br />
Operational definitions of variables and<br />
instructions for use<br />
Below is a clear, systematic explanation of the items<br />
making up the scale and the correct way to respond<br />
to them according to your patient’s wound.<br />
Indicate the score for each item in the box corresponding<br />
to the time of measurement<br />
(e.g., Measurement 0, Date ___________).<br />
1. Ulcer dimensions<br />
1.1. Dimensions: Indicate the measurements as<br />
length x width, as follows:<br />
n Length: Cephalocaudal measurement<br />
(from head to feet)<br />
n Width: Perpendicular to length<br />
Express both measurements in cm. Then multiply<br />
length x width to obtain the area in cm 2 .<br />
Length<br />
Width<br />
Assign a score from 0 to 6 according to the area. For<br />
example, an area of de 44 cm 2 would be scored as 4.<br />
17. Sanada H, Moriguchi T, Miyachi Y, Ohura T, Nakajo<br />
T, Tokunaga K, Fukui M, Sugama J, Kitagawa A.<br />
Reliability and validity of DESIGN, a tool that<br />
classifies pressure ulcer severity and monitors<br />
healing. J Wound Care 2004; 13 (1): 13-18.<br />
18. Polit DF, Hungler BP. Investigación científica en<br />
Ciencias de la Salud: principios y métodos. 6ª. ed.<br />
México: McGraw-Hill Interamericana, 2000, pp.<br />
398-401.<br />
19. Lawshe CH. Quantitative approach to content<br />
validity. Personnel Psychology 1975; 28: 568.<br />
20. Grupo Nacional para el Estudio y Asesoramiento en<br />
Úlceras por Presión y Heridas Crónicas (GNEAUPP).<br />
Instrumentos para la monitorización de la evolución<br />
de una úlcera por presión (Documento VII.<br />
GNEAUPP). En: Documentos GNEAUPP.<br />
21. Santos VLCG, Sellmer D, Massulo MME. Transcultural<br />
adaptation of the Pressure Ulcer Scale for<br />
Healing (PUSH) to the Portuguese language, in<br />
patients with chronic leg ulcers. Programme and<br />
Abstract Book of the 15th Biennial Congress of the<br />
World Council of Enterostomal Therapists 2004; (5):<br />
16-19.<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2
ANNEx 1. RESVECH SCALE V1.0<br />
Items Measurement and dates:<br />
0 1 2 3<br />
1. Wound dimensions:<br />
0. Area = 0 cm2 1. Area < 4 cm2 2. Area = 4 - < 16 cm2 3. Area = 16 - < 36 cm2 4. Area = 36 - < 64 cm2 5. Area = 64 - < 100 cm2 6. Area ≥ 100 cm2 2. Depth/tissues involved:<br />
0. Intact skin healed<br />
1. Dermis-epidermis involved<br />
2. Subcutaneous tissue involved<br />
(adipose tissue not reaching the muscle fascia)<br />
3. Muscle involved<br />
4. Bone and/or attached tissues involved (tendons,<br />
ligaments, joint capsule or black scab blocking<br />
view of the tissues underneath)<br />
3. Edges:<br />
0. Not distinguishable (no wound edges)<br />
1. Diffuse<br />
2. Delimited<br />
3. Damaged<br />
4. Thickened (“aged”, “everted”)<br />
4. Perilesional maceration:<br />
0. No<br />
1. Yes<br />
5. Tunneling:<br />
0. No<br />
1. Yes<br />
6. Type of tissue in the wound bed:<br />
4. Necrotic (dry or moist black scab)<br />
3. Necrotic tissue and/or slough in the bed<br />
2. Granulation tissue<br />
1. Epithelial tissue<br />
0. Closed/healed<br />
7. Exudate:<br />
3. Dry<br />
0. Moist<br />
1. Wet<br />
2. Saturated<br />
3. Leaking exudate<br />
8. Infection/inflammation (biofilm signs):<br />
8.1. Increasingly painful Yes = 1 No = 0<br />
8.2. Erythema around the wound Yes = 1 No = 0<br />
8.3. Edema around the wound Yes = 1 No = 0<br />
8.4. Rising temperature Yes = 1 No = 0<br />
8.5. Increasing exudate Yes = 1 No = 0<br />
8.6. Purulent exudate Yes = 1 No = 0<br />
8.7. Tissue is friable or bleeds easily Yes = 1 No = 0<br />
8.8. Wound stationary, no progress Yes = 1 No = 0<br />
8.9. Tissue compatible with biofilm Yes = 1 No = 0<br />
8.10. Odor Yes = 1 No = 0<br />
8.11. Hypergranulation Yes = 1 No = 0<br />
8.12. Wound increasingly larger Yes = 1 No = 0<br />
8.13. Satellite lesions Yes = 1 No = 0<br />
8.14. Pale tissue Yes = 1 No = 0<br />
ADD UP THE SCORES OF ALL SUB-ITEMS!<br />
9. Frequency of pain (in past 10 days):<br />
0. Never<br />
1. When changing dressing<br />
2. Often<br />
3. All the time<br />
TOTAL SCORE (Max. = 40, Min. = 0)<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2<br />
�<br />
Management of<br />
the Diabetic Foot<br />
Theory & Practice<br />
4 Day Course, 8 - 11 October <strong>2012</strong><br />
Pisa, Italy<br />
This 4 day theoretical course & practical<br />
training gives participants a thorough introduction<br />
to all aspects of diagnosis, management<br />
and treatment of the diabetic foot.<br />
Lectures will be combined with practical<br />
sessions held in the afternoon at the diabetic<br />
foot clinic at the Pisa University Hospital.<br />
Lectures will be in agreement with the<br />
International Consensus on the Diabetic Foot<br />
& Practical Guideline on the Management<br />
and Prevention on the Diabetic Foot.<br />
· COURSE ENDORSED BY ·<br />
EUROPEAN · WOUND · MANAGEMENT· ASSOCI<br />
ATION<br />
This course is endorsed by <strong>EWMA</strong>.<br />
www.diabeticfootcourses.org
Science, Practice and Education<br />
2. Depth/tissues involved: State the score for the greatest<br />
involvement.<br />
3. Edges: The edges are understood as the tissue bordering<br />
the wound bed. Indicate the score that best defines the<br />
edges of your wound:<br />
• Not distinguishable: No borders seen, which may be<br />
the case of a wound that is in the process of healing.<br />
• Diffuse: It is difficult to distinguish them.<br />
• Delimited: Clearly visible edges distinguishable from<br />
the bed. Not thickened.<br />
• Damaged: Well outlined edges, not thickened, that<br />
may show maceration, lesions, etc.<br />
• Thickened, aged or everted: Well outlined edges but<br />
thickened or turned in towards the bed.<br />
4. Perilesional maceration: Perilesional maceration is<br />
defined as softening in the area between the edge and<br />
outward from the wound (toward healthy skin). Indicate<br />
5. Tunneling: Sinuous paths in the wound. Indicate<br />
whether or not these are found in the wound.<br />
6. Type of tissue in the wound bed: This refers to the<br />
type of tissue present in the wound bed. Mark the worst<br />
tissue found with an “x”, according to the following scale<br />
from lesser to greater: necroticsloughgranulation tissueepithelial<br />
tissueclosedhealed.<br />
6.1. Necrotic: This refers to devitalized, black or<br />
brown tissue firmly adhered to the wound bed or<br />
its edges, which may be harder or softer than the<br />
surrounding tissue (skin); dry black scab.<br />
6.2. Slough: Yellow or whitish tissue adhering to the<br />
wound bed in the form of strands, filaments or<br />
thin layers. It falls apart or is very difficult to remove<br />
with pincers.<br />
6.3. Granulation tissue: Pink or shiny, moist and<br />
granular tissue.<br />
6.4. Epithelial tissue: In ulcers or superficial wounds;<br />
new pink tissue or shiny skin growing from the<br />
edges or in islands around the ulcer/wound.<br />
6.5. Closed/healing: The wound is completely covered<br />
with epithelium (new skin).<br />
7. Exudate: This is assessed when changing the dressing,<br />
which may be:<br />
7.1. Moist: Small amounts of fluid are visible when<br />
removing the dressing; the primary dressing may<br />
have slight spotting; the frequency of changing<br />
the dressing is appropriate for the type of dressing.<br />
Note: This is often the objective in the treatment<br />
of exudate.<br />
46<br />
7.2. Dry: The wound bed is dry; there is no visible<br />
moisture and the primary dressing is not stained;<br />
the dressing may be stuck to the wound. Note:<br />
This may be the environment of choice for<br />
ischemic wounds.<br />
7.3. Wet: Small amounts of fluid are visible when<br />
the dressing is removed; the primary dressing is<br />
very stained but there is no exudate flowing; the<br />
frequency of changing the dressing is appropriate<br />
for the type of dressing.<br />
7.4. Saturated: The primary dressing is wet and exudate<br />
is leaking through it; the dressing needs to<br />
be changed more often than usual for this type of<br />
dressing; perilesional skin may be macerated.<br />
7.5. Leaking exudate: The dressing is saturated and<br />
exudate is leaking from the primary and secondary<br />
dressings toward clothing or further; the dressing<br />
needs to be changed much more often than usual<br />
for this type of dressing.<br />
8. Infection/inflammation: Indicate if more than three or<br />
four of the following signs or symptoms of inflammation<br />
are present:<br />
8.1. Increasing pain<br />
8.2. Perilesional erythema<br />
8.3. Perilesional edema<br />
8.4. Rising temperature<br />
8.5. Increasing exudate<br />
8.6. Purulent exudate<br />
8.7. Tissue that is friable or bleeds easily<br />
8.8. Stationary wound that does not progress<br />
8.9. Tissue compatible with biofilm<br />
8.10. Odor<br />
8.11. Hypergranulation<br />
8.12. Increasing size of the wound<br />
8.13. Satellite lesions<br />
8.14. Pale tissue<br />
9. Pain: In the wound area, divided in two<br />
Frequency:<br />
9.1. Never<br />
9.2. When changing the dressing<br />
9.3. Often<br />
9.4. All the time<br />
Intensity: Mark intensity on the VAS scale, according to<br />
the following criteria:<br />
0 = No pain, and 10 = Greatest possible pain<br />
m<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2
iabetic<br />
lcer<br />
non healing for 8 weeks<br />
68 years<br />
despair of wound deterioration<br />
Activates healing naturally<br />
Hyaluronic Acid & Iodine<br />
Promotes granulation<br />
Provides antimicrobial protection<br />
Highly effective in diabetic ulcers*<br />
49 % wounds completely healed<br />
19 % wounds significantly improved<br />
www.hyiodine.com<br />
no social life<br />
*SOBOTKA, L et al. Complex approach to the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.<br />
presented at <strong>EWMA</strong> 2006, <strong>May</strong> 19-20, Prague,<br />
no walks with<br />
grandchildren
ABSTRACTS OF RECENT<br />
COCHRANE REVIEWS<br />
Publication in The Cochrane Library Issue 2, <strong>2012</strong><br />
Aloe vera for treating acute and<br />
chronic wounds<br />
Anthony D Dat, Flora Poon, Kim BT Pham,<br />
Jenny Doust<br />
Citation example: Dat AD, Poon F, Pham KBT, Doust<br />
J. Aloe vera for treating acute and chronic wounds.<br />
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010,<br />
Issue 10. Art. No.: CD008762.<br />
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008762.<br />
Copyright © <strong>2012</strong> The Cochrane Collaboration. Published<br />
by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Background: Aloe vera is a cactus-like perennial succulent<br />
belonging to the Liliaceae Family that is commonly<br />
grown in tropical climates. Animal studies have suggested<br />
that Aloe vera may help accelerate the wound<br />
healing process.<br />
Objectives: To determine the effects of Aloe veraderived<br />
products (for example dressings and topical<br />
gels) on the healing of acute wounds (for example<br />
lacerations, surgical incisions and burns) and chronic<br />
wounds (for example infected wounds, arterial and<br />
venous ulcers).<br />
Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Wounds<br />
Group Specialised Register (9 September 2011), the<br />
Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CEN-<br />
TRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 3), Ovid<br />
MEDLINE (2005 to August Week 5 2011), Ovid<br />
MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations<br />
8 September 2011), Ovid EMBASE (2007 to 2010<br />
Week 35), Ovid AMED (1985 to September 2011) and<br />
EBSCO CINAHL (1982 to 9 September 2011).<br />
We did not apply date or language restrictions.<br />
Selection criteria: We included all randomised controlled<br />
trials that evaluated the effectiveness of Aloe vera,<br />
aloe-derived products and a combination of Aloe vera<br />
and other dressings as a treatment for acute or chronic<br />
wounds. There was no restriction in terms of source,<br />
date of publication or language. An objective measure<br />
of wound healing (either proportion of completely<br />
healed wounds or time to complete healing) was the<br />
primary endpoint.<br />
Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently<br />
carried out trial selection, data extraction<br />
and risk of bias assessment, checked by a third review<br />
author.<br />
Main results: Seven trials were eligible for inclusion,<br />
comprising a total of 347 participants. Five trials in<br />
people with acute wounds evaluated the effects of Aloe<br />
vera on burns, haemorrhoidectomy patients and skin<br />
biopsies. Aloe vera mucilage did not increase burn<br />
healing compared with silver sulfadiazine (risk ratio<br />
(RR) 1.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70 to 2.85).<br />
A reduction in healing time with Aloe vera was noted<br />
after haemorrhoidectomy (RR 16.33 days, 95% CI<br />
3.46 to 77.15) and there was no difference in the proportion<br />
of patients completely healed at follow up after<br />
skin biopsies. In people with chronic wounds, one trial<br />
found no statistically significant difference in pressure<br />
ulcer healing with Aloe vera (RR 0.10, 95% CI -1.59 to<br />
1.79) and in a trial of surgical wounds healing by secondary<br />
intention Aloe vera significantly delayed healing<br />
(mean difference 30 days, 95% CI 7.59 to 52.41).<br />
Clinical heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. The<br />
poor quality of the included trials indicates that the trial<br />
results must be viewed with extreme caution as they<br />
have a high risk of bias.<br />
Authors’ conclusions: There is currently an absence of<br />
high quality clinical trial evidence to support the use of<br />
Aloe vera topical agents or Aloe vera dressings as<br />
treatments for acute and chronic wounds.<br />
Plain language summary: Aloe vera for treating acute<br />
and chronic wounds<br />
Aloe vera is a cactus-like, succulent plant which grows<br />
in tropical climates. Aloe vera is widely used in a variety<br />
of cosmetics including creams and toiletries. Some<br />
studies conducted in animals have suggested that Aloe<br />
vera may help wound healing. Aloe vera can be<br />
applied topically as a cream or gel, or can be impregnated<br />
into a dressing and applied to the wound.<br />
The authors of this Cochrane Review wanted to find<br />
evidence on whether Aloe vera encourages wound<br />
healing in people with acute wounds (for example<br />
lacerations, surgical incisions and burns) and chronic<br />
wounds (for example infected wounds, arterial and<br />
venous ulcers). The review found that there was not<br />
enough research evidence to answer this question.<br />
�<br />
Cochrane Reviews<br />
Sally Bell-Syer, MSc<br />
Managing Editor<br />
Cochrane Wounds Group<br />
Department of<br />
Health Sciences<br />
University of York<br />
United Kingdom<br />
sembs1@york.ac.uk<br />
Conflict of interest: none<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 49
Hydrocolloid dressings for<br />
healing diabetic foot ulcers<br />
Jo C Dumville, Sohan Deshpande, Susan O’Meara, Katharine<br />
Speak<br />
Citation example: Dumville JC, Deshpande S, O’Meara S, Speak<br />
K. Hydrocolloid dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers.<br />
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011,<br />
Issue 5 . Art. No.: CD009099.<br />
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009099.<br />
Copyright © <strong>2012</strong> The Cochrane Collaboration.<br />
Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Background: Foot ulcers in people with diabetes are a prevalent<br />
and serious global health issue. Wound dressings are regarded<br />
as important components of ulcer treatment, with clinicians and<br />
patients having many different types to choose from including<br />
hydrocolloid dressings. There is a range of different hydrocolloids<br />
available including fibrous-hydrocolloid and hydrocolloid<br />
(matrix) dressings. A clear and current overview of current evidence<br />
is required to facilitate decision-making regarding dressing<br />
use.<br />
Objectives: To compare the effects of hydrocolloid wound dressings<br />
with no dressing or alternative dressings on the healing of<br />
foot ulcers in people with diabetes.<br />
Search methods: We searched The Cochrane Wounds Group<br />
Specialised Register (searched 4 January <strong>2012</strong>); The Cochrane<br />
Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane<br />
Library 2011, Issue 4); Ovid MEDLINE (1950 to December<br />
Week 3 2011); Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-<br />
Indexed Citations, January 03, <strong>2012</strong>); Ovid EMBASE (1980 to<br />
2011 Week 52); and EBSCO CINAHL (1982 to 30 December<br />
2011). There were no restrictions based on language or date of<br />
publication.<br />
Selection criteria: Published or unpublished randomised controlled<br />
trials (RCTs) that have compared the effects on ulcer healing<br />
of hydrocolloid with alternative wound dressings or no dressing<br />
in the treatment of foot ulcers in people with diabetes.<br />
Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently<br />
performed study selection, risk of bias assessment and data<br />
extraction.<br />
Main results: We included four studies (511 participants) in the<br />
review: these compared hydrocolloids with basic wound contact<br />
dressings, foam dressings and alginate dressings. Meta-analysis<br />
of two studies indicated no statistically significant difference in<br />
ulcer healing between fibrous-hydrocolloids and basic wound<br />
contact dressings: risk ratio 1.01 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.38). One of<br />
these studies found that a basic wound contact dressing was<br />
more cost-effective than a fibrous-hydrocolloid dressing. One<br />
study compared a hydrocolloid-matrix dressing with a foam<br />
dressing and found no statistically significant difference in the<br />
number of ulcers healed. There was no statistically significant<br />
difference in healing between an antimicrobial (silver) fibroushydrocolloid<br />
dressing and standard alginate dressing; or an antimicrobial<br />
dressing (iodine-impregnated) and a standard fibrous<br />
hydrocolloid dressing.<br />
50<br />
Authors’ conclusions: Currently there is no research evidence to<br />
suggest that any type of hydrocolloid wound dressing is more<br />
effective in healing diabetic foot ulcers than other types of dressing.<br />
Decision makers may wish to consider aspects such as<br />
dressing cost and the wound management properties offered by<br />
each dressing type e.g. exudate management.<br />
Plain language summary: Hydrocolloid dressings to promote<br />
foot ulcer healing in people with diabetes when compared with<br />
other dressing types<br />
Diabetes, a condition which leads to high blood glucose concentrations,<br />
is a common condition with around 2.8 million people<br />
affected in the UK (approximately 4.3% of the population).<br />
Dressings are commonly used to treat foot ulcers in people with<br />
diabetes. There are many types of dressings that can be used,<br />
which also vary considerably in cost.This review (four studies<br />
involving a total of 511 participants) identified no research evidence<br />
to suggest that any type of hydrocolloid wound dressing is<br />
more effective in healing diabetic foot ulcers than other types of<br />
dressing.<br />
Alginate dressings for healing diabetic<br />
foot ulcers<br />
Jo C Dumville, Susan O’Meara, Sohan Deshpande,<br />
Katharine Speak<br />
Citation example: Dumville JC, O’Meara S, Deshpande S,<br />
Speak K. Alginate dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers.<br />
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 5 .<br />
Art. No.: CD009110. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009110.<br />
Copyright © <strong>2012</strong> The Cochrane Collaboration.Published by<br />
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Background: Foot ulcers in people with diabetes mellitus are a<br />
common and serious global health issue. Dressings form a key<br />
part of ulcer treatment, with clinicians and patients having many<br />
different types to choose from including alginate dressings.<br />
A clear and current overview of current evidence is required to<br />
facilitate decision-making regarding dressing use.<br />
Objectives: To compare the effects of alginate wound dressings<br />
with no wound dressing or alternative dressings on the healing<br />
of foot ulcers in people with diabetes mellitus.<br />
Search methods: We searched The Cochrane Wounds Group<br />
Specialised Register (searched 4 January <strong>2012</strong>); The Cochrane<br />
Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane<br />
Library 2011, Issue 4); Ovid MEDLINE (1950 to December<br />
Week 3 2011); Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-<br />
Indexed Citations, January 03, <strong>2012</strong>); Ovid EMBASE (1980 to<br />
2011 Week 52); and EBSCO CINAHL (1982 to 30 December<br />
2011). There were no restrictions based on language or date of<br />
publication.<br />
Selection criteria: Published or unpublished randomised controlled<br />
trials (RCTs) that have compared the effects on ulcer healing<br />
of alginate dressings with alternative wound dressings or no<br />
dressing in the treatment of foot ulcers in people with diabetes.<br />
Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently<br />
performed study selection, risk of bias assessment and data<br />
extraction.<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2
Main results: We included six studies (375 participants) in this<br />
review; these compared alginate dressings with basic wound<br />
contact dressings, foam dressings and a silver-containing,<br />
fibrous-hydrocolloid dressing. Meta analysis of two studies found<br />
no statistically significant difference between alginate dressings<br />
and basic wound contact dressings: risk ratio (RR) 1.09 (95% CI<br />
0.66 to 1.80). Pooled data from two studies comparing alginate<br />
dressings with foam dressings found no statistically significant<br />
difference in ulcer healing (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.08).<br />
There was no statistically significant difference in the number of<br />
diabetic foot ulcers healed when an anti-microbial (silver) hydrocolloid<br />
dressing was compared with a standard alginate dressing<br />
(RR 1.40, 95% CI 0.79 to 2.47). All studies had short follow-up<br />
times (six to 12 weeks), and small sample sizes.<br />
Authors’ conclusions: Currently there is no research evidence to<br />
suggest that alginate wound dressings are more effective in<br />
healing foot ulcers in people with diabetes than other types of<br />
dressing however many trials in this field are very small. Decision<br />
makers may wish to consider aspects such as dressing cost and<br />
the wound management properties offered by each dressing<br />
type e.g. exudate management.<br />
Plain language summary: Alginate dressings for healing foot<br />
ulcers in people with diabetes mellitus<br />
Diabetes mellitus, a condition which leads to high blood glucose<br />
concentrations, is a common condition with around 2.8 million<br />
people affected in the UK (approximately 4.3% of the population).<br />
Wound dressings are widely used to treat foot ulcers in<br />
people with diabetes. There are many types of dressings that<br />
B. Braun Wound Care<br />
Prontosan ® and Askina ® – a powerful team<br />
can be used, which also vary considerably in cost. This review<br />
(six studies involving a total of 375 participants) identified no<br />
research evidence to suggest that alginate wound dressings are<br />
more effective in healing diabetic foot ulcers than other types of<br />
dressing. More, better quality research is needed.<br />
Publication in The Cochrane Library Issue 3, <strong>2012</strong><br />
Interventions for treating phosphorus burns<br />
Loai Barqouni, Nafiz Abu Shaaban, Khamis Elessi<br />
Citation example: Barqouni L, Abu Shaaban N, Elessi K.<br />
Interventions for treating phosphorus burns.<br />
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010 , Issue 11.<br />
Art. No.: CD008805. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008805<br />
Copyright © <strong>2012</strong> The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by<br />
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Background: Phosphorus burns are rarely encountered in usual<br />
clinical practice and occur mostly in military and industrial settings.<br />
However, these burns can be fatal, even with minimal<br />
burn area, and are often associated with prolonged hospitalisation.<br />
Cochrane Reviews<br />
Objectives: To summarise the evidence of effects (beneficial<br />
and harmful) of all interventions for treating people with phosphorus<br />
burns.<br />
�<br />
B. Braun Wound Care products focus on every type of wound at each phase of wound healing. By providing innovative<br />
solutions such as Prontosan ® Wound Irrigation Solution, bacterial biofilm can be efficiently removed thereby clearing the<br />
way for application of advanced wound dressings from the Askina ® range, to assist in the complex task of tissue repair.<br />
B. Braun Medical AG | Infection Control | Sempach | Switzerland<br />
B. Braun Hospicare Ltd. | Collooney | Co. Sligo | Ireland | www.woundcare-bbraun.com<br />
Royal Alliance
Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Wounds Group<br />
Specialised Register (searched 30 September 2011); the<br />
Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The<br />
Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 3); Ovid OLDMEDLINE (1947 to<br />
1965); Ovid MEDLINE (1950 to September Week 3 2011);<br />
Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations<br />
29 September 2011); Ovid EMBASE (1980 to 2011 Week 38);<br />
EBSCO CINAHL (1982 to 23 September 2011) and Conference<br />
Proceedings Citation Index - Science (CPCI-S) (1990 to<br />
30 September 2011).<br />
Selection criteria: Any comparisons of different ways of managing<br />
phosphorus burns including, but not restricted, to randomised<br />
trials.<br />
Data collection and analysis: We found two non-randomised<br />
comparative studies, both comparing patients treated with and<br />
without copper sulphate.<br />
Main results: These two comparative studies provide no evidence<br />
to support the use of copper sulphate in managing phosphorus<br />
burns. Indeed the small amount of available evidence<br />
suggests that it may be harmful.<br />
Authors’ conclusions: First aid for phosphorus burns involves<br />
the common sense measures of acting promptly to remove the<br />
patient’s clothes, irrigating the wound(s) with water or saline<br />
continuously, and removing phosphorus particles. There is no<br />
evidence that using copper sulphate to assist visualisation of<br />
phosphorus particles for removal is associated with better outcome,<br />
and some evidence that systemic absorption of copper<br />
sulphate may be harmful. We have so far been unable to identify<br />
any other comparisons relevant to informing other aspects of<br />
the care of patients with phosphorus burns. Future versions of<br />
this review will take account of information in articles published<br />
in languages other than English, which may contain additional<br />
evidence based on treatment comparisons.<br />
Plain language summary: Interventions for treating phosphorus<br />
burns<br />
Phosphorus is a chemical element sometimes used in a military<br />
or industrial context. Phosphorus burns resulting from military or<br />
industrial injuries are chemical burns that can be fatal. Although<br />
rare, these burns are serious, often very deep and painful, and<br />
can be associated with lengthy periods of time in hospital for<br />
patients.<br />
The usual procedure for dealing with phosphorus burns is to<br />
remove any affected clothing and wash the wounds with water<br />
or saline solution. In addition, copper sulphate can be used to<br />
make the particles of phosphorus more visible and easier to<br />
remove, however, copper sulphate is poisonous and can in itself<br />
be fatal if absorbed into the body. This review found two retrospective<br />
studies (88 patients) that compared burns treated with<br />
or without copper sulphate. The review found no evidence that<br />
using copper sulphate improves the outcome of the burn,<br />
indeed, based upon the limited available evidence, the review<br />
authors suggest that copper sulphate should not be used in the<br />
treatment of phosphorus burns.<br />
No other studies were identified that could be used to assess<br />
other treatments for this type of burn.<br />
52<br />
Publication in The Cochrane Library Issue 4, <strong>2012</strong><br />
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for chronic wounds<br />
Peter Kranke, Michael H Bennett, Marrissa Martyn-St James,<br />
Alexander Schnabel, Sebastian E Debus, Irmgard Roeckl-Wiedmann<br />
Citation example: Kranke P, Bennett MH, Martyn-St James M,<br />
Schnabel A, Debus SE, Roeckl-Wiedmann I. Hyperbaric oxygen<br />
therapy for chronic wounds. Cochrane Database of Systematic<br />
Reviews 2004 , Issue 2 . Art. No.: CD004123. DOI:<br />
10.1002/14651858.CD004123.pub2<br />
Copyright © <strong>2012</strong> The Cochrane Collaboration.<br />
Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Background: Chronic wounds are common and present a health<br />
problem with significant effect on quality of life. Various pathologies<br />
may cause tissue breakdown, including poor blood supply<br />
resulting in inadequate oxygenation of the wound bed. Hyperbaric<br />
oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been suggested to improve<br />
oxygen supply to wounds and therefore improve their healing.<br />
Objectives: To assess the benefits and harms of adjunctive<br />
HBOT for treating chronic ulcers of the lower limb.<br />
Search methods: For this first update we searched the Cochrane<br />
Wounds Group Specialised Register (searched 12 January<br />
<strong>2012</strong>); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials<br />
(CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 4); Ovid<br />
MEDLINE (1950 to January Week 1 <strong>2012</strong>); Ovid MEDLINE<br />
(In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, 11 July <strong>2012</strong>);<br />
Ovid EMBASE (1980 to <strong>2012</strong> Week 01); and EBSCO CINAHL<br />
(1982 to 6 January <strong>2012</strong>).<br />
Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing<br />
the effect on chronic wound healing of therapeutic regimens<br />
which include HBOT with those that exclude HBOT (with or<br />
without sham therapy).<br />
Data collection and analysis: Three review authors independently<br />
evaluated the risk of bias of the relevant trials using the<br />
Cochrane methodology and extracted the data from the<br />
included trials. We resolved any disagreement by discussion.<br />
Main results: We included nine trials (471 participants). Eight<br />
trials (455 participants) enrolled people with a diabetic foot<br />
ulcer: pooled data of three trials with 140 participants showed<br />
an increase in the rate of ulcer healing (risk ratio (RR) 5.20, 95%<br />
confidence interval (CI) 1.25 to 21.66; P = 0.02) with HBOT at<br />
six weeks but this benefit was not evident at longer-term followup<br />
at one year. There was no statistically significant difference in<br />
major amputation rate (pooled data of five trials with 312 participants,<br />
RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.18). One trial (16 participants)<br />
considered venous ulcers and reported data at six weeks<br />
(wound size reduction) and 18 weeks (wound size reduction and<br />
number of ulcers healed) and suggested a significant benefit of<br />
HBOT in terms of reduction in ulcer area only at six weeks<br />
(mean difference (MD) 33.00%, 95% CI 18.97 to 47.03, P <<br />
0.00001). We did not identify any trials that considered arterial<br />
and pressure ulcers.<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2
Authors’ conclusions: In people with foot ulcers due to diabetes,<br />
HBOT significantly improved the ulcers healed in the short term<br />
but not the long term and the trials had various flaws in design<br />
and/or reporting that means we are not confident in the results.<br />
More trials are needed to properly evaluate HBOT in people with<br />
chronic wounds; these trials must be adequately powered and<br />
designed to minimise all kinds of bias.<br />
Plain language summary: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for treating<br />
chronic wounds<br />
Chronic wounds, often associated with diabetes, arterial or<br />
venous disease, are common and have a high impact on the<br />
well-being of those affected. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT)<br />
is a treatment designed to increase the supply of oxygen to<br />
wounds that are not responding to other measures to treat<br />
them. HBOT involves people breathing pure oxygen in a specially<br />
designed chamber (such as that used for deep sea divers<br />
suffering pressure problems after resurfacing).<br />
This review update of randomised trials found that HBOT<br />
seems to improve the chance of healing diabetes-related foot<br />
ulcers and may reduce the number of major amputations in<br />
people with diabetes who have chronic foot ulcers. In addition<br />
this therapy may reduce the size of wounds caused by disease to<br />
the veins of the leg, but the review found no evidence to confirm<br />
or refute any effect on other wounds caused by lack of blood<br />
supply through the arteries or pressure ulcers.<br />
Designed for the<br />
prevention and treatment<br />
of heel pressure ulcers.<br />
• Forefoot support to prevent<br />
foot drop<br />
• Three sizes to ensure a proper fit<br />
• Washable/autoclavable<br />
The soft foam design and spare<br />
elevation pad make it easy to<br />
customize the Heelift to meet a<br />
patient’s unique needs.<br />
• Relieve pressure on the Achilles<br />
tendon or ankle<br />
• Control hip rotation<br />
To request a free sample,<br />
demo DVD, or CD please visit<br />
www.heelift.com/w<br />
Heelift® Patent No. 5,449,339 & 7,458,948.<br />
© <strong>2012</strong>, DM Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. <strong>EWMA</strong><br />
Affixed pad<br />
lifts the leg to<br />
suspend the heel<br />
Europe:<br />
DARCO (Europe) GmbH<br />
Negative pressure wound therapy for skin grafts<br />
and surgical wounds healing by primary intention<br />
Joan Webster, Paul Scuffham, Karen L Sherriff,<br />
Monica Stankiewicz, Wendy P Chaboyer<br />
Citation example: Webster J, Scuffham P, Sherriff KL, Stankiewicz<br />
M, Chaboyer WP. Negative pressure wound therapy for skin<br />
grafts and surgical wounds healing by primary intention.<br />
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 8.<br />
Art. No.: CD009261. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261<br />
Copyright © <strong>2012</strong> The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by<br />
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Background: Indications for the use of negative pressure wound<br />
therapy (NPWT) are broadening with a range of systems on the<br />
market, including those designed for use on clean, closed incisions<br />
and skin grafts. Reviews have concluded that the evidence<br />
for the effectiveness of NPWT remains uncertain. However, this<br />
is a rapidly evolving therapy. Consequently, a systematic review<br />
of the evidence for the effects of NPWT on postoperative<br />
wounds expected to heal by primary intention is required.<br />
Objectives: To assess the effects of NPWT on surgical wounds<br />
(primary closure or skin grafting) that are expected to heal by<br />
primary intention.<br />
Search methods: We searched the following electronic databases<br />
to identify reports of relevant randomised clinical trials:<br />
the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (searched 11<br />
November 2011); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled<br />
Anatomy of a Heelift ®<br />
Extended stitching<br />
along top rim<br />
supports the<br />
forefoot<br />
Tricot covered stiffener<br />
maintains the boot’s structure<br />
while the friction-free material<br />
allows the boot to easily slide<br />
across bed sheets<br />
Gewerbegebiet 18, 82399 Raisting<br />
Telefon +49 (0) 8807.9228-0<br />
Fax +49 (0) 8807.9228-22<br />
info@darco.de<br />
www.darco-online.com<br />
Available in<br />
smooth and<br />
convoluted<br />
foam interiors<br />
Soft adjustable<br />
straps secure the<br />
boot in place<br />
Global:<br />
Cochrane Reviews<br />
�<br />
Ventilation holes<br />
allow added air<br />
circulation<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
Stand #<br />
X L6<br />
Beveled fixed pad<br />
reduces pressure<br />
on calf<br />
1316 Sherman Ave. Evanston IL 60201<br />
Phone +1 847 328 9540<br />
Fax +1 847 328 7950<br />
info@dmsystems.com<br />
www.heelift.com
Cochrane Reviews<br />
Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 4); Database<br />
of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (The Cochrane Library<br />
2011, Issue 4); Ovid MEDLINE (2005 to October Week 4 2011);<br />
Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations 8<br />
November 2011); Ovid EMBASE (2009 to 2011 Week 44); and<br />
EBSCO CINAHL (1982 to 04 November 2011). We conducted a<br />
separate search to identify economic evaluations.<br />
Visit <strong>EWMA</strong><br />
on our Social Media<br />
platforms<br />
Follow us and get the latest updates about<br />
the <strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2012</strong> Conference<br />
as well as other <strong>EWMA</strong> activities:<br />
www.facebook.com/<strong>EWMA</strong>.Wound<br />
www.linkedin.com/company/<br />
european-wound-management-association<br />
Twitter: @ewmatweet<br />
Remember to use #<strong>EWMA</strong><strong>2012</strong>,<br />
when you tweet about the <strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2012</strong> Conference<br />
54<br />
ienna<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
Selection criteria: We included trials if they allocated patients at<br />
random and compared NPWT with any other type of wound dressing<br />
or compared one type of NPWT with a different type of NPWT.<br />
Data collection and analysis: We assessed trials for their appropriateness<br />
for inclusion and for their quality. This was done by<br />
three review authors working independently, using pre-determined<br />
inclusion and quality criteria.<br />
Main results: We included five eligible trials with a total of 280<br />
participants. Two trials involved skin grafts and three acute<br />
wounds. Only one of the five trials reported the proportion of<br />
wounds completely healed and in this study all wounds healed.<br />
All five studies reported adverse events. In the four trials that<br />
compared standard dressings with negative pressure wound therapy<br />
(NPWT) the adverse event rate was similar between groups<br />
(negative pressure 33/86; standard dressing 37/103); risk ratio<br />
(RR) 0.97 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.33 to 2.89). There<br />
was significant heterogeneity for this result, due to the high incidence<br />
of fracture blisters in the NPWT group in one trial. One<br />
trial (87 participants) compared a commercial negative pressure<br />
device VAC® system with a negative pressure system developed<br />
in the hospital (GSUC). The adverse event rate was lower in the<br />
GSUC group (VAC® 3/42; GSUC 0/45); the RR was 0.13 (95%<br />
CI 0.01 to 2.51). Results indicate uncertainty about the true<br />
effect of either method on adverse events. The mean cost to supply<br />
equipment for VAC® therapy was USD 96.51/day compared<br />
to USD 4.22/day for the GSUC therapy (P = 0.01). Labour costs<br />
for dressing changes were similar. Pain intensity score was also<br />
reported to be lower in the GSUC group when compared with the<br />
VAC® group (p = 0.02)<br />
Authors’ conclusions: Evidence for the effectiveness of NPWT on<br />
complete healing of wounds expected to heal by primary intention<br />
remains unclear. Rates of graft loss may be lower when<br />
NPWT is used; but evidence to date suggests that hospital-based<br />
products are as effective in this area as commercial applications.<br />
There are clear cost benefits when non-commercial systems are<br />
used to create the negative pressure required for wound therapy,<br />
with no reduction in clinical outcome. Pain levels are also rated<br />
lower when hospital systems are compared with their commercial<br />
counterparts. The high incidence of blisters occurring when<br />
NPWT is used following orthopaedic surgery suggests that the<br />
therapy should be limited until safety in this population is established.<br />
Given the cost and widespread use of NPWT, there is an<br />
urgent need for suitably powered, high-quality trials to evaluate<br />
the effects of the newer NPWT products that are designed for use<br />
on clean, closed surgical incisions. Such trials should focus initially<br />
on wounds that may be difficult to heal, such as sternal<br />
wounds or surgeries for obese patients.<br />
Plain language summary: Negative pressure wound therapy for<br />
acute surgical wounds.<br />
Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) involves applying suction<br />
to healing wounds. NPWT has been used for many years for<br />
the treatment of chronic wounds, such as leg ulcers and bed<br />
sores. More recently, the device has been modified for use on<br />
clean surgical wounds, including skin grafts. We undertook a<br />
review of studies that have compared NPWT with other wound<br />
treatments. We found five trials which showed that evidence to<br />
support the use of NPWT to promote faster healing and to<br />
reduce complications associated clean surgery remains unclear.<br />
m<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2
Wounds Respond to<br />
ragile Skin � Burns � Skin Tears � EB Wo unds � Full/Partial Thickness Wounds � Traumatic Wounds � Fragile<br />
aumatic Wounds � Full/Partial Thickness W o u n d s � E B Wounds � Skin Tears � Burns � Fragile Skin � Bur<br />
References:<br />
1. Sessions R. Examining the Evidence for a Drug-free Dressing’s Ability to Decrease Wound Pain.<br />
Poster Presentation. Clinical Symposium on Advances in Skin & Wound Care. October 2008. Las Vegas, NV USA.<br />
2. Stenius M. Fast Healing of Pressure Ulcers in Spinal Cord Injured (SCI) People Through the Use of PolyMem ® Dressings.<br />
Poster Presentation. <strong>EWMA</strong>. <strong>May</strong> 2008. Lisbon, Portugal.<br />
3. Tamir J, Haik J. Polymeric Membrane Dressings for Skin Graft Donor Sites: 4 Years Experience on 800 Cases.<br />
Poster Presentation. Clinical Symposium on Advances in Skin & Wound Care. October 2008. Las Vegas, NV USA.<br />
PolyMem’s unique formulation<br />
has the ability to reduce<br />
patients’ total wound pain<br />
experience while actively<br />
encouraging healing 1,2,3<br />
FERRIS MFG. CORP. | 16W300 83rd St., Burr Ridge, IL 60527 USA | International: +1 630.887.9797 | WWW.POLYMEM.EU<br />
Unless otherwise indicated, all trademarks are owned by or licensed to Ferris. © 2010, Ferris Mfg. Corp., 16W300 83rd Street, Burr Ridge, IL 60527 USA MKL-383-I, REV-4, 0910
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal<br />
Previous Issues<br />
The <strong>EWMA</strong> Journals can be downloaded free of charge from www.ewma.org<br />
56<br />
Volume 12, no 1, January <strong>2012</strong><br />
How to rate the wound debridement trauma?<br />
Jan Stryja<br />
Ensuring equitable wound management education<br />
within the Australian context<br />
Jan Rice<br />
Low wound prevalence and cost burden:<br />
The impact of a multidisciplinary wound specialist team<br />
Alison Hopkins, Fran Worboys, John Posnett<br />
The results of a comprehensive wound audit in a<br />
UK primary care trust<br />
Alison Hopkins, Fran Worboys<br />
Pressure ulcer programme of research – PURPOSE<br />
Nixon J, Wilson L.M, Coleman S, Gorecki C, Muir D, Pinkney L,<br />
Keen J, Briggs M, McGinnis E, Stubbs N, Dealey C, Nelson A<br />
The skin’s own bacteria may aggravate inflammatory and<br />
occlusive changes in atherosclerotic arteries of lower limbs<br />
Waldemar L. Olszewski, Piotr Andziak, M. Moscicka-Wesolowska,<br />
Bozenna Interewicz, Ewa Swoboda, Ewa Stelmach<br />
Problem with the post burn wound pain: Chronic profiles<br />
Laima Juozapaviciene, Rytis Rimdeika, Aurika Karbonskiene<br />
Volume 11, no 3, October 2011<br />
Challenges facing district nurses in the prevention<br />
of pressure ulcers<br />
Lynne Watret<br />
Clinical application of stem cells in wound healing:<br />
A near future?<br />
Benoit I Hendrickx<br />
Understanding the Patient Experience:<br />
Does empowerment link to clinical practice?<br />
Patricia Price<br />
The Influence of Egyptian Propolis on Induced Burn Wound<br />
Healing in Diabetic Rats – Antibacterial Mechanism<br />
Emad T. Ahmed, Osama M. Abo-Salem, Ali Osman<br />
PURSUN UK: The Pressure Ulcer Research Service User<br />
Network for the UK<br />
Delia Muir<br />
Perspective of the European Patients’ Forum Developing<br />
Collaboration<br />
Nicola Bedlington<br />
Volume 11, no 2, <strong>May</strong> 2011<br />
The fight against biofilm infections:<br />
Do we have the knowledge and means?<br />
Klaus Kirketerp-Møller, Thomas Bjarnsholt, Trine R. Thomsen<br />
Biofilms in wounds: An unsolved problem?<br />
António Pedro Fonseca<br />
Diabetic foot ulcer pain: The hidden burden<br />
Sarah E Bradbury, Patricia E Price<br />
Topical negative pressure in the treatment of deep sternal<br />
infection following cardiac surgery: Five year results of first-line<br />
application protocol<br />
Martin Šimek<br />
Wounds Research for Patient Benefit: A five year programme of<br />
research in wound care<br />
Karen Lamb, Nikki Stubbs, Jo Dumville, Nicky Cullum<br />
Volume 11, no 1, January 2011<br />
Who will take on<br />
Ali Barutcu, Aydin O. Enver, Top Husamettin, Violeta Zatrigi<br />
Diabetic foot ulcer pain: The hidden burden<br />
Sarah E Bradbury, Patricia E Price<br />
The reconstructive clockwork as a 21st century concept in<br />
wound surgery<br />
Karsten Knobloch, Peter M. Vogt<br />
Anaemia in patients with chronic wounds<br />
Lotte M. Vestergaard, Isa Jensen, Knud Yderstraede<br />
A survey of the provision of education in wound management<br />
to undergraduate nursing students<br />
Zena Moore, Eric Clarke<br />
Caring for Patients with Hard-to-Heal Wounds – Homecare<br />
Nurses’ Narratives<br />
Camilla Eskilsson<br />
Other Journals<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> wishes to facilitate the exchange of information<br />
on wound healing in a broad perspective with<br />
this section on International Journals.<br />
Italian<br />
English<br />
Finnish<br />
Spanish<br />
Acta Vulnologica, vol. 10, no 1, <strong>2012</strong><br />
www.vulnologia.it<br />
Preliminary survey of the prevalence of chronic skin wounds in<br />
the region of Marche<br />
Pierangeli M., Grassetti L., Torressetti M., Bottoni E., Calamita R.,<br />
Gioacchini M., Tartaglione C., Di Benedetto G. M., Scalise A.<br />
Systematic review of the literature about wound management<br />
Stiavetti E., Poli S., Romanelli M.<br />
Extreme wound care: is it always the best choice?<br />
Presentation of a case report<br />
Palombi M., Fratto D., Cataldo F., Sortino A., Martinelli F.,<br />
Palombi L.<br />
Advances in Skin & Wound Care, vol. 25, no 5, <strong>2012</strong><br />
www.aswcjournal.com<br />
Eradication of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus<br />
in Pressure Ulcers Comparing a Polyhexanide-Containing<br />
Cellulose Dressing with Polyhexanide Swabs in a<br />
Prospective Randomized Study<br />
T. Wild, et al.<br />
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on the Use of<br />
Honey to Protect from the Effects of Radiation-Induced<br />
Oral Mucositis<br />
J. J. Song, P. Twumasi-Ankrah, R. Salcido<br />
Estimates of Evaporation Rates from Wounds for<br />
Various Dressings/Support Surface Combinations<br />
C. Lachenbruch, C. VanGilde<br />
Exploring the Effects of Pain and Stress on Wound Healing<br />
K. Y.Woo<br />
Haava, no. 1, <strong>2012</strong><br />
www.shhy.fi<br />
Haava 1-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Infection or Inflammation?<br />
Ansa Iivanainen, Esa Soppi<br />
Criterions of Wound Infection<br />
Tiina Pukki, Ansa Iivanainen (ed.)<br />
Cost- effective Wound Care<br />
Kielo Turtiainen<br />
SIRO – Do we have the surgical side infections in Finland?<br />
Outi Lyytikäinen<br />
Antibiotics in Management of Infected Wound<br />
Kirsi Skogberg<br />
Wound Management Challenging the Skills of Hand hygienia<br />
Carina Einimö<br />
Wound Infection was Heal but the Patient was Succumb<br />
Tiina Pukki<br />
Wound Management in Home Care<br />
Gunilla Lindholm<br />
Succeeded Treatment of Infected Wound<br />
Päivi Sinkkonen<br />
Diary of the Treatment of Patient with Erysipelas<br />
Mirja Pakkanen<br />
Infection of trauma wound – traumatic experience<br />
Eija Luotola<br />
Individuality in Dermatologic Nursing<br />
Helcos, vol. 23, no. 1, <strong>2012</strong><br />
Quality assessment of the spanish clinical practyice<br />
guidelines of pressure ulcers<br />
Hernandez Martinez-Esparza E; Verdú-Soriano J.<br />
Diaper rash. Local treatment with barrier products and<br />
quality of life<br />
Rueda Lopez J; Guerrero Palmero A; Segovia Gomez;<br />
Muñoz BUeno AM; Bermejo Martinez M; Rosell Moreno C.<br />
Pressure ulcer prevention and muscular and skeletal<br />
injuries. Patient with stoke<br />
Luque Moreno C; Peña Salinas M; Rodriguez Pappalardo F;<br />
López Rodriguez L.<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2
English<br />
English<br />
Int. Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds vol. 11, no 1, <strong>2012</strong><br />
http://ijlew.sagepub.com<br />
Wound Physicians: Lymphedema Is Not a Problem That Will Go<br />
Away if Ignored<br />
Miltos K. Lazarides and Raj Mani<br />
Reporting an Alliance Using an Integrative Approach to the<br />
Management of Lymphedema in India5<br />
Terence J. Ryan and Saravu R. Narahari<br />
From Lymph to Fat: Liposuction as a Treatment for Complete<br />
Reduction of Lymphedema<br />
Håkan Brorson<br />
Multidisciplinary Lymphedema Treatment Program<br />
Maria-Christina Papadopoulou, et.al.<br />
Interdisciplinary Lymphology: The Best Place for Each Discipline in<br />
a Team<br />
Ethel Foeldi and Evangelos P. Dimakakos<br />
The Madura Foot: Looking Deep<br />
Sandhya Venkatswami, Anandan Sankarasubramanian, Shobana<br />
Subramanyam<br />
Diabetic Foot Screening: New Technology versus 10g Monofilament<br />
Michelle C. Spruce and Frank L. Bowling<br />
Management of Neglected Femoral Neck Fractures and Nonunions<br />
using a Novel Triple Surgery Combination: An Indian Experience<br />
Amit Kapoor, Lakshmi Venkatesh Deety, Vinith Zachariah John,<br />
Sathish Devadoss, and A. Devadoss<br />
Custom-Made Orthesis and Shoes in a Structured Follow-Up<br />
Program Reduces the Incidence of Neuropathic Ulcers<br />
in High-Risk Diabetic Foot Patients<br />
Loredana Rizzo, et.al.<br />
International Wound Journal, vol. 9, no 2, <strong>2012</strong><br />
www.wiley.com<br />
Wound management innovation cooperative research centre<br />
– a new model for inter-disciplinary wound research<br />
S Prowse, Z Upton<br />
Prevalence of lymphoedema and quality of life among patients<br />
attending a hospital-based wound management and vascular clinic<br />
G Gethin, D Byrne, S Tierney, H Strapp, S Cowman<br />
Split-thickness skin graft donor site management: a randomized<br />
controlled trial comparing polyurethane with calcium alginate<br />
dressings<br />
L Higgins, J Wasiak, A Spinks, H Cleland<br />
Multimodal therapy as an algorithm to limb salvage in diabetic<br />
patients with large heel ulcers<br />
EB Goudie, C Gendics, JC Lantis II<br />
Elevated uric acid correlates with wound severity<br />
ML Fernandez, Z Upton, H Edwards, K Finlayson, GK Shooter<br />
Comparative study of the microvascular blood flow in the intestinal<br />
wall during conventional negative pressure wound therapy and<br />
negative pressure wound therapy using paraffin gauze over the<br />
intestines in laparostomy<br />
S Lindstedt, J Hansson, J Hlebowicz<br />
Development of an evidence-based protocol for care of pilonidal<br />
sinus wounds healing by secondary intent using a modified reactive<br />
Delphi procedure. Part one: the literature review<br />
CL Harris, S Holloway<br />
Development of an evidence-based protocol for care of pilonidal<br />
sinus wounds healing by secondary intent using a modified Reactive<br />
Delphi procedure. Part 2: methodology, analysis and results<br />
CL Harris, S Holloway<br />
Improving wound score classification with limited remission spectra<br />
J Schmidt, A Hapfelmeier, W-D Schmidt, U Wollina<br />
Leczenie Ran Issue 1, vol. 9, <strong>2012</strong><br />
Biofilm Based Wound Care: strategy for the treatment of chronic<br />
wounds affected by the infection caused by microorganisms in the<br />
form of biofilms<br />
Marzenna Bartoszewicz, Adam Junka<br />
Role of heat shock proteins in burns and systemic inflammatory<br />
response<br />
Beata Sosada, Marek Kawecki, Mariusz Nowak<br />
High Voltage Stimulation for the treatment of hard-to-heal wounds<br />
and oedemas<br />
Krzysztof Materniak, Anna Nowak-Wró¿yna, Marek Kawecki,<br />
Mariusz Nowak<br />
Brachysyndactyly–hypospadiasis and other untypical correlation of<br />
the congenital hand deformities<br />
Anna Chrapusta, Jacek Puchaa<br />
Patient with diabetic foot syndrome in the surgical ward<br />
Katarzyna Cierzniakowska, Maria T. Szewczyk, Arkadiusz Jawieñ,<br />
Karolina Szymañska, Paulina Moœcicka<br />
English<br />
English<br />
German<br />
Scandinavian<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong><br />
Phlebologie, no 2, <strong>2012</strong><br />
www.schattauer.de<br />
The foam sclerotherapy: Observational study using air and<br />
CO2-O2-sclerosing<br />
Hesse<br />
Histological changes after the circular varicose vein treatment<br />
endoluminal thermal ablation (closure fast)<br />
Brachmann<br />
Prevalence of local complications and risk factors of Beinvarikose<br />
in German general practices<br />
Mueller-Buehl<br />
Through the eyes of Laplace: The Role of wall tension in<br />
varicose veins<br />
Korff<br />
Controlled studies comparing endovenous Therapppie of<br />
varicose veins. If the stripping surgery still competitive?<br />
Mumme<br />
Schiller’s illness and his funeral, Part 2 (medical history)<br />
Hach<br />
Acute bilateral thrombosis of deep leg and pelvic veins<br />
Diedrich<br />
Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 20, no 2, <strong>2012</strong><br />
www.wiley.com<br />
Enhancing Braden pressure ulcer risk assessment in acutely ill<br />
adult veterans<br />
Linda J. Cowan, et.al.<br />
The relationship between skin stretching/contraction and<br />
pathologic scarring: The important role of mechanical forces<br />
in keloid generation<br />
Rei Ogawa, et.al.<br />
Role of cytokines in lavage or drainage fluid after hemithyroidectomy<br />
in wound healing: Involvement of histamine in the<br />
acceleration and delay of wound healing<br />
Miku Arai, et.al.<br />
Impaired cutaneous wound healing in transforming growth<br />
factor-b inducible early gene1 knockout mice<br />
Keijiro Hori, et.al.<br />
Selective release of cytokines, chemokines, and growth<br />
factors by minced skin in vitro supports the effectiveness<br />
of autologous minced micrografts technique for chronic ulcer<br />
repair<br />
Ginevra Pertusi, et.al.<br />
Pyrvinium, a potent small molecule Wnt inhibitor, increases<br />
engraftment and inhibits lineage commitment of mesenchymal<br />
stem cells (MSCs)<br />
Sarika Saraswati, et.al.<br />
Wund Management, vol. 6, no 2, <strong>2012</strong><br />
English abstracts are available from www.mhp-verlag.de<br />
How to equip an obesity centre<br />
P. Pick<br />
Antimicrobial therapy of intra-abdominal infections due to<br />
resistant bacteria in patients with morbide obesity<br />
C. Eckmann, P. Kujath, H. Shekarriz<br />
Chronic wounds and nutrition<br />
U. Bonacker<br />
The role of a point-of-care protease test in wound diagnostics<br />
R. Strohal, J. Dissemond, G. Hastermann, K. Herberger,<br />
S. Läuchli, G. Luch, D. <strong>May</strong>er, T. Neubert, M. Storck<br />
Wounds (SÅR) vol. 20, no 1, <strong>2012</strong><br />
www.saar.dk<br />
Growth Factors for the Treatment of Chronic Wounds<br />
Rasmus Lundquist<br />
Interesting Alternative for Debridement of Wounds<br />
Helen Skovgaard-Holm, Helle Simonsen<br />
The History of Wound Infection<br />
Svend Norn, Henrik Permin, Poul R. Kruse, Edith Kruse<br />
Haderslev Makes the Processes More Efficient which have had<br />
Positive Benefits in both Economy and quality<br />
Jens Fonnesbech<br />
Prevention of Pressure Ulcer in the Municipality of Køge<br />
– A success!<br />
Birgit Andersen<br />
”Tele Wounds” for Copenhagen – A pilot project<br />
Jens Fonnesbech<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 57
<strong>EWMA</strong><br />
<strong>EWMA</strong><br />
Teacher network<br />
The <strong>EWMA</strong> Education Committee is currently working<br />
to establish a network for wound management<br />
teachers in Europe. This initiative arose from Pan<br />
European surveys and focus group interviews of education<br />
providers and teachers of wound management. These activities<br />
unearthed a desire by teachers for greater support in their<br />
teaching of wound management.<br />
The primary objectives of the network will be:<br />
n To increase collaboration on objectives, structure and<br />
content of future wound management education and<br />
training in Europe;<br />
n To explore the possibilities for establishing a sustainable<br />
lifelong learning training programme for nurse<br />
teachers.<br />
The <strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2012</strong> conference which takes place in Vienna<br />
2325 <strong>May</strong> will host the initial meeting of the Teacher Network.<br />
This meeting will take place on Wednesday 23 <strong>May</strong><br />
<strong>2012</strong>, 11:45-13:45.<br />
Meeting Agenda<br />
1) Welcome and introduction of participants<br />
2) Approval of agenda<br />
3) Rationale and background for establishing the network<br />
4) Reflection and input for the network concept<br />
• When reading the email invitation, what did you<br />
have in your mind that a network might be?<br />
• <strong>EWMA</strong>’s vision of what the network might be<br />
5) Establish agreement on key objectives for the network<br />
6) Establish short and longterm action plan to meet the<br />
objectives<br />
7) Agree on the establishment of communication forum<br />
8) Next meeting<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> hopes that the meeting will attract teachers from<br />
many different countries and institutions, as active participation<br />
by all relevant institutions is crucial in ensuring that all<br />
views and needs are addressed.<br />
Teachers interested in joining the meeting or network during<br />
the <strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2012</strong> Conference are kindly asked to sign<br />
up by email to the <strong>EWMA</strong> Secretariat, ewma@ewma.org<br />
or come to the <strong>EWMA</strong> secretariat office during the Vienna<br />
conference in <strong>May</strong>.<br />
Zena Moore<br />
58<br />
ienna<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
23-25 <strong>May</strong><br />
Austrian<br />
Diabetic Foot Symposium<br />
Through the <strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2012</strong> conference in Vienna,<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong>, in collaboration with the Austrian<br />
Wound Association (AWA), The International<br />
Working Group on the diabetic Foot (IWGDF),<br />
The Diabetic Foot Study Group (DFSG) of The<br />
European Association for the study of Diabetes,<br />
has arranged a symposium focusing on the implementation<br />
of multidisciplinary diabetic foot<br />
treatment.<br />
During the presentations the symposium will set<br />
out some of the basic principles of the IWGDF<br />
consensus guidelines, following which the program<br />
will proceed with a session aiming to present<br />
examples of implementation of the multidisciplinary<br />
treatment model from various different regions<br />
across Europe. To wrap up the day an overview<br />
of the current treatment results in Europe<br />
will be given. This presentation will be followed<br />
by a panel discussion aiming to give recommendations<br />
for future strategies towards optimizing<br />
diabetic foot treatment in Austria.<br />
The symposium is an integrated part of a larger<br />
project with the overall objective to support and<br />
contribute actively to the implementation of the<br />
IWGDF’s “Global consensus guidelines on the<br />
management and prevention of the Diabetic<br />
Foot” in Austria in order to allow diabetic foot patients<br />
access to best practice standards of diabetic<br />
foot care at specialised multidisciplinary diabetic<br />
foot care clinics.<br />
The Symposium takes place<br />
Thursday <strong>24</strong> <strong>May</strong> <strong>2012</strong>, 08:00-15:30.<br />
The symposium is in English with simultaneous<br />
translation into German.<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2
International<br />
Consensus on the<br />
management and<br />
prevention of the<br />
diabetic foot 2011<br />
Content:<br />
n Definitions & Criteria<br />
n Epidemiology of the diabetic foot<br />
n Psycho-social and economic factors<br />
n Pathophysiology of foot ulceration<br />
n Diabetic neuropathy<br />
n The diabetic foot ulcer management<br />
and outcomes<br />
n Interventions to enhance the healing<br />
of chronic ulcers of the foot in<br />
diabetes<br />
n Infection in the diabetic foot<br />
n Peripheral arterial disease and<br />
diabetes<br />
n Footwear and offloading<br />
n Neuro-osteoarthropathy<br />
n Amputations in people with diabetes<br />
n How to prevent foot problems<br />
n How to organize a diabetic foot clinic<br />
n Implementation of guidelines<br />
n P.E.D.I.S. a diabetic foot ulcer<br />
classification system<br />
And:<br />
n Practical guidelines on the<br />
management and prevention of<br />
the diabetic foot 2011<br />
n Specific guidelines on wound and<br />
wound bed management 2011<br />
n Specific guidelines for the treatment<br />
of diabetic foot infections 2011<br />
n Specific guidelines for the diagnosis<br />
and treatment of pad in a diabetic<br />
patient with a foot ulcer 2011<br />
n Specific guidelines on footwear<br />
and offloading 2007<br />
Plus many pictures and three video’s.<br />
Now available at: http://shop.idf.org<br />
Price Euro 20.00 (+ shipping)
<strong>EWMA</strong><br />
·PATIENT OUTCOME GROUP·<br />
EUROPEAN · WOUND · MANAGEMENT· ASSOCI<br />
ATION<br />
Pratricia Price<br />
Chair of the<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Patient<br />
Outcome Group<br />
1 Gottrup F, Apelqvist J, Price P:<br />
Outcomes in controlled and comparative<br />
studies on<br />
non-healing wounds:<br />
Recommendations to improve<br />
the quality of evidence in<br />
wound management,<br />
Journal of Wound Care,<br />
Vol 19, Iss 6,<br />
6 June 2010, pp 237-268<br />
The Patient Outcome Group<br />
Following the publication of the <strong>EWMA</strong><br />
document on evidence and outcomes<br />
within wound management 1 , the <strong>EWMA</strong><br />
Patient Outcome Group (POG) received a great<br />
deal of interest and support from both European<br />
and international stakeholders. The level of interest<br />
supports the need for further activities to<br />
develop and disseminate the key messages introduced<br />
in this document.<br />
In order to assist in the development of high<br />
quality evidence across a range of research types<br />
used in wound management, the POG is currently<br />
working on a set of clinical study recommendations<br />
covering the main types of non healing<br />
wounds. Each document will include a short<br />
checklist to assist in the development of relevant<br />
research questions and identify frequent mistakes<br />
made by novice researchers at each stage of the<br />
research process including planning, conducting<br />
and reporting RCTs and cohort studies. To<br />
ensure consistency with existing standards and<br />
regulations, a wide range of links will be included<br />
to ensure that researchers can navigate their way<br />
through the substantial amount of information<br />
available on relevant topics.<br />
The new documents are expected to be ready<br />
for publication in <strong>2012</strong>2013.<br />
Concurrent with these activities, the <strong>EWMA</strong><br />
POG is in the process of refining the objectives<br />
for the group and prioritising future goals. The<br />
focus will still be on addressing the various common<br />
challenges that clinicians and industry face<br />
by providing a forum for discussion, exchanging<br />
knowledge and generating ideas for the benefits<br />
of <strong>EWMA</strong>’s work and objectives.<br />
Current members of the <strong>EWMA</strong> Patient Outcome Group are:<br />
Clinicians:<br />
Patricia Price, Chair<br />
Martin Abel<br />
Jan Apelqvist<br />
Matthias Augustin<br />
Industry representatives:<br />
Brigitte Espirac<br />
Finn Gottrup<br />
Luc Gryson<br />
Deborah Klestadt<br />
Harald Kuhlmann<br />
Hans Lundgren<br />
Robert Strohal
Say hello to SNaP. ®<br />
My partner in healing.<br />
The SNaP ® Wound Care System combines the portability of advanced<br />
wound dressings with the proven efficacy of negative pressure therapy<br />
in a discreet design that won’t get noticed.<br />
m Small, silent, lightweight design disappears under clothes<br />
m Demonstrated non-inferiority in wound healing outcomes<br />
for patients completing at least 4 weeks of therapy 1<br />
m The SNaP ® System interferes significantly less with overall<br />
activity, sleep and social interactions than the V.A.C. ® System 1<br />
www.spiracur.com<br />
Spiracur Inc.<br />
1180 Bordeaux Drive<br />
Sunnyvale, CA 94089<br />
+1.408.701.5300<br />
1. Armstrong, D. G., W. A. Marston, et al. “Comparison of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with the SNaP®<br />
Wound Care System vs. V.A.C.® Therapy System for the Treatment of Chronic Lower Extremity Ulcers:<br />
A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.” Wound Rep Reg 2011; 19; 173-180.<br />
Spiracur, SNaP and SNaP & Design are registered trademarks of Spiracur Inc.<br />
The SNaP® Wound Care System is protected by one or more U.S.patents, with other<br />
U.S. and certain foreign patents pending. ©<strong>2012</strong> Spiracur Inc. All rights reserved.<br />
Active healing that’s out of sight.
<strong>EWMA</strong><br />
Jan Apelqvist<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> President<br />
62<br />
We want<br />
to make a difference!<br />
– <strong>EWMA</strong> future projects<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> has a number of projects in which we<br />
are obliged to participate or on which we have<br />
an opinion.<br />
For a long time the challenge has been to raise<br />
awareness of wounds in the political arena. However,<br />
the wider focus on the increasing elderly<br />
population and the demographic challenges across<br />
Europe have increased the focus on the burden<br />
of wounds; not only to patients but to the whole<br />
health care system.<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> is participating actively in these discussions.<br />
Most recently, we were invited to speak in<br />
the European Parliament as one MEP is particularly<br />
concerned about the burden of wounds and<br />
the need for increased political focus. (Read about<br />
this on page 64).<br />
Some of the focus areas of <strong>EWMA</strong> for the next<br />
year will be:<br />
n <strong>EWMA</strong> is becoming more involved in the<br />
EU’s institutions and through this involvement<br />
being heard and actively participating<br />
in working groups<br />
n <strong>EWMA</strong> will participate in EU applications<br />
as part of larger consortiums<br />
n <strong>EWMA</strong> has decided to set down a Patient<br />
Panel/Focus Group. As a multidisciplinary<br />
organisation, <strong>EWMA</strong> believes that the patient<br />
is a valuable resource in the multidisciplinary<br />
team. We need to increase the focus<br />
and thereby better understand the potential<br />
of this. <strong>EWMA</strong> will increase the focus on<br />
multidisciplinary teams with a project focussing<br />
on how to organise the treatment;<br />
how to work together across disciplines,<br />
specialities and health care sectors. Read<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong>’s point of view on multidisciplinary<br />
teams on page 66.<br />
n Telemedicine or EHealth is becoming more<br />
and more important as a way of securing the<br />
multidisciplinary approach to care as well as<br />
the patients’ selfmanagement. <strong>EWMA</strong> will<br />
address this issue this year as well as next<br />
year and there will be a session on this in<br />
Copenhagen next year. The focus will be on<br />
sharing information within multidisciplinary<br />
teams, collecting scientific data and furthering<br />
the education of health care personnel,<br />
patients and relatives. <strong>EWMA</strong> will develop<br />
the existing focus on home care and how to<br />
improve the quality of life for patients with a<br />
wound by securing that the right treatment<br />
is given to the patient at all times.<br />
n One of <strong>EWMA</strong>’s key objectives is to assist/<br />
facilitate the creation of new national wound<br />
management associations. Russia and its<br />
neighbouring countries have for a long time<br />
been at the heart of <strong>EWMA</strong>’s work to meet<br />
this objective. Prof. Rytis Rimdeika, member<br />
of <strong>EWMA</strong> Council, has been appointed<br />
by the <strong>EWMA</strong> Council to head this process<br />
and much progress has already been made –<br />
for example, there will be special focus on<br />
this area during the conference this year in<br />
Vienna, Austria, where a large number of<br />
activities in Russian are planned. <strong>EWMA</strong><br />
wishes to continue these efforts and will<br />
follow up on the activities in numerous ways<br />
including, amongst others, a Russian spoken<br />
sym posium at <strong>EWMA</strong> 2013, Copenhagen,<br />
Denmark.<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2
100 years on<br />
The<br />
future<br />
of podiatry<br />
11-13 October <strong>2012</strong><br />
Glasgow, SECC<br />
100 th Anniversary<br />
Conference & Exhibition<br />
<strong>2012</strong> is the 100th anniversary of organised podiatry<br />
in the UK. This year’s conference will be a special<br />
celebratory event, bringing members together in<br />
Glasgow to celebrate this unique and exciting occasion.<br />
The conference committee is producing an exceptional programme of events that will<br />
offer delegates a one-off experience and a conference not to be missed!<br />
We are extremely excited to announce that the hugely popular<br />
physicist and BBC television presenter, Professor Brian Cox OBE,<br />
will be attending the conference as a special guest, with a keynote<br />
presentation on Thursday morning.<br />
Don’t miss the opportunity to present at this year’s conference by submitting an<br />
abstract of your scientific research, practical innovations and areas of general practice<br />
for poster or oral presentation.<br />
The top scoring papers will be presented in the relevant concurrent sessions on their<br />
topic and will also be published in the Journal of Foot & Ankle Research (JFAR).<br />
Cash prizes will be awarded for the best papers.<br />
Oral submissions deadline 29 April <strong>2012</strong><br />
Poster submissions deadline 31 August <strong>2012</strong><br />
To submit an abstract or for further information visit<br />
www.scpconference.com<br />
or call 020 88327311
<strong>EWMA</strong> Document on<br />
Antimicrobials<br />
The document form will be developed from a<br />
Health Technology Assessment, where elements of<br />
health economics and patient perspectives will be<br />
represented as well as a comprehensive technological<br />
review.<br />
The document will include political, organisational<br />
and economic points of view in addition to the<br />
clinical discussion regarding when to use which<br />
categorised product. Furthermore, as <strong>EWMA</strong> is a<br />
multidisciplinary organisation, we will take all specialities<br />
into consideration. This is also reflected in the<br />
composition of the author group. The document will<br />
result in recommendations. We expect that one of<br />
the main focus areas of the document will be antimicrobial<br />
resistance.<br />
Members of the working group are:<br />
n Finn Gottrup, Surgery,<br />
Bispebjerg Hospital, Denmark<br />
n Jan Apelqvist, Endocrinologist (health economy),<br />
University Hospital of Malmö, Sweden<br />
n Zena Moore, Nursing,<br />
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Ireland<br />
n Sebastian Probst, Nursing, Zurich University of<br />
Applied Sciences, Switzerland<br />
n Rose Cooper, Microbiology,<br />
Cardiff Metropolian University (UWIC), Wales<br />
n Thomas Bjarnsholt, Microbiology/biofilm,<br />
Copenhagen University, Denmark<br />
n Edgar Peters, Infection, University Medical<br />
Center, Amstersdam, The Netherlands<br />
Finn Gottrup<br />
Supporting Companies<br />
64<br />
AWCS group<br />
EU ‘WEEK FOR LIFE’<br />
Prof. Jan Apelqvist, Mr. Alojz Peterlé, Dr. Bernard Thill<br />
and Mr. Vittorio Prodi<br />
On 26 March <strong>2012</strong> <strong>EWMA</strong> was invited by Member<br />
of the EU Parliament, Mr Vittorio Prodi, to<br />
present in a seminar during the ‘week for life’<br />
event under the theme: Europe against Cancer –<br />
the spirit of care. The invitation was based on the<br />
strong profile of <strong>EWMA</strong> within multidisciplinarity<br />
and organisation of treatment.<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> President, Jan Apelqvist, described the<br />
importance of a multidisciplinary approach to<br />
wound management and applied this approach to<br />
any kind of treatment. The <strong>EWMA</strong> presentation<br />
also related wound management to the organisation<br />
of palliative care for cancer patients, stressing<br />
that the multidisciplinary approach is essential<br />
with regards to the quality of life of the patient<br />
as well as efficiency within the health care system.<br />
The primary message of <strong>EWMA</strong> was the importance<br />
of removing barriers for collaboration<br />
between different specialists and groups of staff.<br />
Failure to remove these barriers is likely to cause<br />
an expensive treatment of poor quality.<br />
MEP Prodi expressed his gratitude for the presence<br />
of <strong>EWMA</strong> at the meeting and confirmed his<br />
great interest in wound management.<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2
<strong>EWMA</strong>’s communication strategy was discussed at the<br />
latest <strong>EWMA</strong> Council meeting in March. The Council<br />
decided that it would be possible to make some small<br />
changes to the overall communication which <strong>EWMA</strong> has<br />
with its members. These include: <strong>EWMA</strong> Journal as a<br />
member magazine, <strong>EWMA</strong> Newsletter, the <strong>EWMA</strong> website<br />
and the communicative activities at the <strong>EWMA</strong> conference.<br />
Technology and the number of communication tools<br />
available is ever increasing and improving. This offers<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> many new opportunities to communicate more<br />
efficiently with the <strong>EWMA</strong> stakeholders.<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal is primarily designed to be a membership<br />
journal, with a specific focus on promoting activities<br />
and sharing wound relevant news, scientific knowledge<br />
and clinical experience between the target groups:<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> members, <strong>EWMA</strong> Cooperating Organisations,<br />
other partner organisations, sponsoring companies and<br />
health administrators/decision-makers. At the same time<br />
this meets another <strong>EWMA</strong> objective of facilitating the<br />
spread of knowledge on wound care and educating new<br />
generations of wound care professionals.<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Council has decided to reduce the number of<br />
issues of the <strong>EWMA</strong> Journal to two per year, published in<br />
<strong>May</strong> and October. This decision will support the unique<br />
profile of the <strong>EWMA</strong> Journal with the objective of supplementing<br />
existing wound journals rather than competing<br />
with them. Finally, a reduction in the number of issues of<br />
the <strong>EWMA</strong> Journal from 2013 give capacity for activities<br />
covering other communication tools.<br />
The <strong>EWMA</strong> Journal will continue to reflect <strong>EWMA</strong>’s<br />
knowledge and expertise with respect to wound management<br />
activities across Europe. Sue Bale<br />
ienna<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
23-25 <strong>May</strong><br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Document on<br />
Debridement<br />
The <strong>EWMA</strong> document on Debridement will provide an<br />
updated overview of the various debridement options.<br />
It will offer a clarification of the principal role of debridement<br />
and define the possibilities and limitations for<br />
standard and new debridement options.<br />
The document is expected ready for publication by the<br />
end of summer <strong>2012</strong> and will be written by an author<br />
group consisting of: Robert Strohal, Editor,<br />
Jan Apelqvist, Co-editor, Joachim Dissemond,<br />
Julie Jordan O’Brien, Alberto Piaggesi, Rytis Rimdeika<br />
and Trudie Young.<br />
A key session on Debridement at the <strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
Conference in Vienna will present the main topics of<br />
the document:<br />
Key session: Debridement<br />
Wednesday 23 <strong>May</strong> 16.45-18.00<br />
• R. Strohal: The position of debridement in<br />
wound healing: An introduction<br />
• T. Young: Bedside options for debridement<br />
• R. Rimdeika: Surgical debridement and technical<br />
solutions<br />
• J. Apelqvist: Challenges and health-economy<br />
• R. Strohal: The process of debridement and a<br />
clinical algorithm<br />
Robert Strohal<br />
The <strong>EWMA</strong> Debridement Document is supported by:<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2012</strong>: Russian spoken Symposium in Vienna<br />
Following the success of the Russian symposium during<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> 2009 in Helsinki, a full day symposium in Russian will<br />
take place on Wednesday 23rd <strong>May</strong>, 10:00-19:00.<br />
The symposium includes 25 presentations from Russia, Ukraine and Belarus,<br />
including a round table discussion with representatives from the national<br />
wound management organisations. Among the topics are:<br />
Pediatric Wounds, Burns, Evidence-based approach and Chronic Wounds.<br />
The symposium is organized by <strong>EWMA</strong> and AWA. It is held in Russian with<br />
simultaneous translation into English.<br />
A number of sessions on Thursday <strong>24</strong> <strong>May</strong> will also be translated<br />
from English into Russian.<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 65<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong>
<strong>EWMA</strong> focus on multidisciplinarity<br />
in wound management<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> is a multidisciplinary association working to<br />
secure the best possible treatment of the patient, provided<br />
in a cost efficient manner to the benefit of society.<br />
For these reasons, it is important for <strong>EWMA</strong> to<br />
stress the significance of securing a multidisciplinary<br />
approach to wound management throughout Europe.<br />
The key messages of <strong>EWMA</strong> are:<br />
n The multidisciplinary approach to wound management<br />
improves healing rates, prevents adverse events<br />
and increases patients’ quality of life1,2,3,4,5 n Outcome studies support that the multidisciplinary<br />
approach reduces the overall cost to society4,5,6 n Multidisciplinary wound centers secure a high level<br />
of expertise within the group of staff, resulting in a<br />
fast and correct diagnosis and treatment of the patient1,3<br />
n Existing barriers for collaboration between different<br />
specialists and groups of staff must be defined and<br />
removed.<br />
MULTIDISCIPLINARITy – A DEFINITION<br />
Multidisciplinary collaboration is established with the<br />
objective of producing outcomes that cannot be achieved<br />
without collaboration. A multidisciplinary approach brings<br />
together experts from the various relevant disciplines to<br />
collectively address a complex problem 7,8 .<br />
Within wound management in general the relevance of<br />
multidisciplinarity lies in the need to integrate knowledge<br />
of different aspects of treatment such as wound healing,<br />
tissue repair, wound care, long term scarring and specialist<br />
knowledge about the various etiologies.<br />
The multidisciplinary approach to wound management<br />
is often expressed in the establishment of wound<br />
healing expert groups in hospitals or wound healing centers<br />
3 .<br />
References:<br />
1. Apelqvist, J, Larsson, J: What is the most effective way<br />
to reduce incidence of amputation in the diabetic<br />
foot?, Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews,<br />
Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2000; 16 (Suppl 1);<br />
pp. 75-S83.<br />
2. McCabe, C.J., R.C. Stevenson, A.M. Dolan: Evaluation<br />
of a diabetic foot screening and protection<br />
programme, Diabetic Medicine, January 1998, vol. 15;<br />
Issue 1; pp. 80–84.<br />
3. Gottrup, F, Holstein, P, Jørgensen, B, Lohmann, M,<br />
Karlsmark, T.: A New Concept of a Multidisciplinary<br />
Wound Healing Center and a National Expert Function<br />
of Wound Healing, Arch. Surgery. July 2001; vol.136;<br />
pp. 765-772<br />
66<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong><br />
4. Kadriye A, Mehlika I, Karakaya J, Gürlek A: Change in<br />
amputation predictors in diabetic foot disease: effect of<br />
multidisciplinary approach, Endocr (2010) 38: 87-92<br />
5. Driver Vickie R, Fabbi M, Lavery L A, Gibbons G: The<br />
cost of diabetic foot: The economic case for the limb<br />
salvage team, Journal of vascular surgery, September<br />
Supplement 2010<br />
6. Matricali G A, Dereymaeker G, Muls E, Flour M,<br />
Mathieu C: Economic aspects of diabetic foot care in a<br />
multidisciplinary setting: A review, Diabetes/metabolism<br />
research and reviews, review article Diabetes<br />
Metab Res Rev 2007; vol 23; pp. 339-347.<br />
The Diabetic Foot Example<br />
Diabetic foot ulcers represent a large percentage of the<br />
chronic wounds. Due to the total situation of the diabetes<br />
patient, these ulcers are characterised by a complexity that<br />
necessitates a multifactorial approach in which aggressive<br />
management of infection and ischemia is of major importance.<br />
For the same reason, a processoriented approach<br />
in the evaluation of prevention and management of the<br />
diabetic foot is essential.<br />
Thus, correct diagnosis and treatment requires a multidisciplinary<br />
team including diabetologists, orthopedic<br />
surgeons, vascular surgeons, diabetes nurses, wound care<br />
nurses, podiatrists and orthotists. A close cooperation<br />
with primary health care is also important 1 .<br />
The negative consequences of diabetic foot ulcers on<br />
quality of life include not only morbidity but also disability<br />
and premature mortality. Costs for healing ulcers are high.<br />
For ulcers resulting in amputation they are even higher,<br />
due to prolonged hospitalisation, rehabilitation, and need<br />
for home care and social service.<br />
One of the most important steps to reduce cost in the<br />
management of the diabetic foot is to avoid amputations.<br />
A costeffective management should not only be focused<br />
on the shortterm cost until healing but also on the longterm<br />
cost related to increased reulceration rate and lifelong<br />
disability caused by foot ulcers and amputations. A<br />
multidisciplinary approach including a preventive strategy,<br />
patient and staff education, and multifactorial treatment of<br />
foot ulcers has been reported to reduce the amputation rate<br />
significantly and in some cases by more than 50% 1,4,5,9 .<br />
Currently various barriers for collaboration between different<br />
specialists and groups of staff exist. Failure to remove<br />
these barriers is likely to result in an expensive treatment<br />
of poor quality.<br />
Jan Apelqvist<br />
7. Gottrup F, Nix DP, Bryant RA.: The Multidisciplinary<br />
Team Approach to Wound Management<br />
In: Acute and chronic wounds. Current management<br />
concepts. (Third edition). Eds. Ruth A. Bryant, Denise<br />
P. Nix. Mosby (Elsevier), St. Louise, 2007; pp. 23-38.<br />
8. Davey L, Solomon JM, Freeborn SF: A multidisciplinary<br />
approach to wound care, Journal of Wound Care.<br />
1994; vol. 3; pp. <strong>24</strong>9-252.<br />
9. Ragnarson-Tenvall G, Apelqvist J. Prevention of<br />
diabetes-related foot ulcers and amputations: a<br />
cost-utility analysis based on Markov model simulations.<br />
Diabetologia. 2001; vol. 44; pp. 2077-2087<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2
23 rd Conference of the<br />
European Wound Management Association<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> 2013<br />
15-17 <strong>May</strong> · 2013 · Copenhagen · Denmark<br />
New abstract deadline: 1 January 2013<br />
ORGANISATION AND<br />
COOPERATION IN COPENHAGEN<br />
Organised by the European Wound Management Association<br />
in cooperation with the Danish Wound Healing Society · www.saar.dk<br />
WWW.<strong>EWMA</strong>.ORG / <strong>EWMA</strong>2013
<strong>EWMA</strong><br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> participation in EU Conference on<br />
Antimicrobials Resistance – it’s time to take joint action!<br />
On 14 March <strong>2012</strong> Rytis Rimdeika, Member of the<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Council, represented <strong>EWMA</strong> at a high level<br />
EU presidency Conference: Combating Antimicrobials<br />
Resistance – Time for Joint Action. <strong>EWMA</strong> was selected<br />
amongst leading expert groups across Europe to take part<br />
in the conference. The conference was held in the Bella<br />
Centre in Copenhagen, Denmark, which coincidentally<br />
is also the venue of the next <strong>EWMA</strong> conference in 2013.<br />
The conference was jointly hosted by the Ministry of<br />
Health and the Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries<br />
of Denmark and by the EUCommission. Participation<br />
in the conference is linked to the <strong>EWMA</strong> Document on<br />
Antimicrobials which is expected to be ready for publication<br />
by the end of <strong>2012</strong>.<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> considers the conference invitation a significant<br />
accomplishment as regards reaching out to national<br />
authorities as well as to the European Union. This is part<br />
of <strong>EWMA</strong>’s long term strategy – to place wound management<br />
high on the political agenda both nationally and in<br />
the EU Institutions.<br />
The conference was opened by Her Royal Highness Crown<br />
Princess Mary of Denmark. Key speakers at the first session<br />
were Dr. Margaret Chan, DirectorGeneral of the World<br />
Health Organisation (WHO) and Dr. Marc Sprenger, Director<br />
of the European Centre for Disease Preventions and<br />
Control (ECDC). All the speakers spoke of the dangers<br />
of excessive use of antimicrobials in medicines for both<br />
humans and animals. The microbial resistance to antibiotics<br />
is emerging in all the countries of the EU and beyond.<br />
Research has indicated a link between the consumption<br />
of antibiotics in animals and resistance development in<br />
humans. Overuse of antibiotics in medicine, both in primary<br />
health sector and hospitals is exacerbating the problem.<br />
This calls for collaboration between the human and<br />
veterinary sectors across the EU and nongovernmental<br />
organisations to combat the growing problem of antibiotic<br />
overuse. The sharing of innovative ideas and the exchange<br />
of best practices are needed.<br />
The two day conference consisted of theoretical lectures<br />
and practical workshops. Presentations were given by many<br />
wellknown specialists in veterinary and human medicine<br />
and public health and by politicians. Best practices and<br />
initiatives to reduce antimicrobial resistance in Denmark,<br />
the UK and France were presented to the audience. The<br />
Workshops were focused on three topics: Stop the overuse<br />
of antibiotics both in humans and animals; reduce the<br />
68<br />
use of Critically Important Antimicrobials (CIA), and the<br />
surveillance and collection of compatible data. Participants<br />
of the conference stressed the need for surveillance and<br />
reduction of irrational use of CIAs – Fluoroquinolones,<br />
Cephaslosporins (these two groups widely used in both<br />
human and veterinary medicine), Cholestin (used only<br />
in veterinary) and Carbapenems (authorised for human<br />
use). Antimicrobial resistance against the CIAs is particularly<br />
worrying, as they are “the last resort” treatment for<br />
a number of very serious diseases. A strictly prudent use<br />
of CIAs should therefore be implemented internationally<br />
as resistant microbes can spread worldwide through the<br />
global movement of persons and food products of animal<br />
origin.<br />
Participants of the conference outlined these final statements<br />
and conclusions:<br />
1. Antibiotics in animal health should only be used in<br />
context of biosecurity, good nutrition, good housing<br />
and vaccinations being in place.<br />
2. Good examples of best practice are extremely important<br />
for promoting the prudent use of antibiotics.<br />
3. Guidelines should be established for the prudent use<br />
of antimicrobials in the primary health sector and<br />
the hospital sector. Better control of use of antibiotics<br />
in long care institutions is also important.<br />
4. It is very important to raise awareness among the<br />
publics regarding the overuse and improper use of<br />
antibiotics and the risks for the individual arising<br />
from that over / improper use.<br />
5. Clear legal framework both in the EU and at national<br />
levels is needed to fight the problem.<br />
6. Collection, analysis and real time reporting of data<br />
is essential for the understanding of the problem and<br />
the planning of means to combat the problem.<br />
The dangers of excessive use of antimicrobials have been<br />
known for decades. Raising awareness and taking action<br />
against microbial resistance is not new to the European<br />
Union, but taking further action within the Union and beyond<br />
is now necessary in order to effectively meet the challenges<br />
of that growing resistance. And nongovernmental<br />
international organisations such as those in the wound<br />
management field like <strong>EWMA</strong> and its cooperating partners<br />
will play an important role in helping to implement<br />
the very important tasks required for a positive outcome.<br />
In other words – it’s time to take joint action!<br />
Rytis Rimdeika<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2
Submit your next paper to Phlebologie<br />
iris.weiche@schattauer.de
The Eucomed Advance Wound Care Sector<br />
Group is currently involved in<br />
many activities and initiatives at the<br />
European Union level. A number of these are<br />
where AWCS and <strong>EWMA</strong> are currently working<br />
together. These are listed below.<br />
To begin with I will elaborate on the EU 2020<br />
goals and strategy which are highly relevant to<br />
the work we are currently conducting. The Eucomed<br />
/ AWCS group is involved in the<br />
projects italicized.<br />
EU 2020 GOAL & STRATEGy<br />
Woundcare reflections<br />
on the EU 2020 strategy<br />
– Eucomed Advanced Wound Care Sector Group (AWCS) perspectives<br />
Hans Lundgren<br />
Chair of the Eucomed<br />
Advanced Wound Care<br />
Sector Group<br />
Correspondence:<br />
Hans.Lundgren@<br />
molnlycke.com<br />
70<br />
The five targets for the EU in 2020<br />
(and how to measure progress)<br />
Policies and Commission initiatives are driven by<br />
these overall goals:<br />
1. Employment<br />
• 75% of the 2064 yearolds to be employed<br />
2. R&D / Innovation<br />
• 3% of the EU’s GDP (public and private<br />
combined) to be invested in R&D / innovation<br />
3. Climate change / Energy<br />
• greenhouse gas emissions 20% lower than<br />
1990<br />
• 20% of energy from renewables<br />
• 20% increase in energy efficiency<br />
4. Education<br />
• reducing school dropout rates below<br />
10%<br />
• at least 40% of 3034 yearolds completing<br />
third level education<br />
5. Poverty / Social exclusion<br />
• at least 20 million fewer people in or at<br />
risk of poverty and social exclusion<br />
The seven flagship initiatives<br />
(new engines to boost growth and jobs)<br />
Smart growth:<br />
1. Digital agenda for Europe<br />
2. Innovation Union<br />
3. Youth on the move<br />
Sustainable growth:<br />
4. Resource efficient Europe<br />
5. An industrial policy for the globalisation era<br />
Inclusive growth:<br />
6. An agenda for new skills and jobs<br />
7. European platform against poverty<br />
DIGITAL AGENDA FOR EUROPE<br />
This is a strategy to ensure a flourishing digital<br />
economy by 2020. It outlines policies and actions<br />
to maximize the benefit of the Digital Revolution<br />
for all. One of the planned actions of the Digital<br />
Agenda is Information and Communication<br />
Technology (ICT) for Social Challenges. This is<br />
where the Commission aims to increase access<br />
to online medical data2 and assisted living programmes3<br />
and the uptake of eHealth solutions1<br />
through EU wide standards,.<br />
AWCS and <strong>EWMA</strong> are involved in ehealth solutions<br />
and access to online medical data as well as<br />
assisted living programmes.<br />
INNOVATION UNION<br />
This aims to increase the innovation potential of<br />
Europe by removing obstacles to innovation and<br />
revolutionizing the way the public and private sectors<br />
work together4. The first pilot partnership is<br />
the European Partnership on Active and Healthy<br />
Ageing (AHAIP)5 which aims to bring together<br />
stakeholders from the supply and demand sides4<br />
to identify and overcome barriers to innovation in<br />
the health sector with the intended goal of adding<br />
two quality years to the lives of European citizens<br />
by 2020.<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2
AWCS and <strong>EWMA</strong> are involved in the organisation of<br />
care and the referral of patients between different sectors.<br />
As part of the Active and Healthy Ageing Partnership<br />
AWCS and <strong>EWMA</strong> are following the proceedings closely<br />
and are very involved.<br />
PATIENT SAFETy CAMPAIGN<br />
The Council Recommendations on patient safety including<br />
the prevention and control of HCAIs (Health Care<br />
Acquired Infections) were adopted in 2009 and provide<br />
nonbinding recommendations for Member States regarding<br />
patient safety. As part of the recommendations, the<br />
European Commission is mandated to review the progress<br />
made by member states since 2009. The implementation<br />
of the recommendations is being evaluated through a questionnaire6<br />
sent out to member states in April 2011, which<br />
includes a general safety section and a portion dedicated<br />
specifically to HCAIs. A report on the responses must be<br />
published by <strong>2012</strong>.<br />
Additionally, a Joint Action on Patient Safety and Quality<br />
of Care is being organized to assist the Commission<br />
with implementation of certain aspects of the Council<br />
Recommendations, particularly concerning coordination<br />
and exchange of best practices within the member states.<br />
For example, AWCS / <strong>EWMA</strong> will aim to ensure the adoption<br />
of patient safety recommendations for the prevention<br />
of wounds/infections and to make sure that exchange of<br />
best practice with regards to wound care is considered<br />
within the Joint Action. This can be seen as a follow up<br />
on the activities conducted in 2011, where <strong>EWMA</strong> and<br />
AWCS submitted questions for the member states’ questionnaire<br />
on patient safety.<br />
ACTIVITIES/INITIATIVES WHERE<br />
AWCS/<strong>EWMA</strong> ARE CURRENTLy INVOLVED<br />
1. Wound treatment in patient’s own home by<br />
collaboration between hospital and home care:<br />
A Health Technology Assessment<br />
In December 2011, the Danish National Board of<br />
Health published an HTA with the above title.<br />
The HTA concluded, amongst other things, that<br />
patients with pressure ulcers which are treated by<br />
a wound care nurse from the hospital wound care<br />
centre, are healed equally well in their own home as<br />
at the hospital.<br />
2. Transcontinental Wound Registry (TWR)<br />
The AWT (Academy of Wound Technology), together<br />
with supporting partners from the industry,<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong><br />
has started a pilot project of a worldwide registry<br />
on wound healing and tissue repair. Nine facilities,<br />
with expertise in wound management and located in<br />
Europe, the USA and Asia, are participating in a 52<br />
week pilot phase. The TWR pilot phase results will<br />
be presented at the WUWHS meeting on Yokohama<br />
in September <strong>2012</strong>.<br />
3. Innovation in the sector of demographic ageing<br />
A first step has been taken through the contact with<br />
AAL (Ambient Assisted Living) which has a seat at<br />
the European Innovation Partnership: Pilot on Active<br />
& Healthy Ageing. For advanced wound care,<br />
potential topics are telemedicine, monitoring devices<br />
and patient specific data.<br />
4. Collaboration between the industry and academia<br />
Since June 2007, Eucomed AWCS has held twenty<br />
meetings in partnership with <strong>EWMA</strong>, which reflects<br />
the spirit of the Innovation Partnership.<br />
5. European Innovation Partnership on Active and<br />
Healthy Ageing (AHAIP)<br />
Adoption of the Strategic Implementation Plan<br />
(SIP) and call for stakeholders to populate the five<br />
task forces. A letter has been sent from Mr Prodi<br />
inviting <strong>EWMA</strong> to become a member of the Task<br />
Force responsible for implementing actions in the<br />
area of developing, disseminating and promoting<br />
successful innovative integrated care models for<br />
chronic diseases amongst older patients.<br />
6. Questionnaire about Patient Safety sent out by<br />
the European Commission<br />
AWCS/<strong>EWMA</strong> have the opportunity to support<br />
the European Commission with questions related<br />
to wound care. The engagement raises awareness in<br />
the Commission of AWCS/<strong>EWMA</strong>’s interest in this<br />
dossier and provides an avenue for future discussions<br />
with the Commission – particularly the use of<br />
adequate wound care treatments to increase patient<br />
safety through prevention and control of infections.<br />
7. Joint Action on Patient Safety and Quality of Care<br />
The Joint Action is being organized by HAS (Haute<br />
Autorité de Santé) in France and there are more than<br />
40 Associated Partners (EPF, European Patient’s<br />
Forum is one) participating, in addition to the 17<br />
Collaborating Partners. In order to take a seat in<br />
this Joint Action, AWCS/<strong>EWMA</strong> need to highlight<br />
any substantial public health issue. We think the<br />
ongoing debate on antibioticresistance is a potential<br />
opening to raise awareness on issues of patient safety<br />
related to wound care, specifically in terms of surgical<br />
wounds, pressure ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers.<br />
Therefore <strong>EWMA</strong> has taken the initiative to write a<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Antimicrobial Document. m<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 71
Corporate A<br />
ConvaTec Europe<br />
www.convatec.com<br />
Covidien (UK) Commercial Ltd.<br />
Paul Hartmann AG<br />
www.hartmann.info<br />
Corporate B<br />
3M Health Care<br />
www.mmm.com<br />
Abbott Nutrition<br />
www.abbottnutrition.com<br />
Absorbest<br />
www.absorbest.se<br />
Advanced BioHealing, Inc.<br />
www.AdvancedBioHealing.com<br />
AOTI Ltd.<br />
www.aotinc.net<br />
72<br />
Corporate Sponsors<br />
KCI Europe Holding B.V.<br />
www.kci-medical.com<br />
Lohmann & Rauscher<br />
www.lohmann-rauscher.com<br />
Mölnlycke Health Care Ab<br />
www.molnlycke.com<br />
Ferris Mfg. Corp.<br />
www.PolyMem.eu<br />
ArjoHuntleigh<br />
www.ArjoHuntleigh.com<br />
B. Braun Medical<br />
www.bbraun.com<br />
BSN medical GmbH<br />
www.bsnmedical.com<br />
www.cutimed.com<br />
Chemviron<br />
www.chemvironcarbon.com<br />
Curea Medical GmbH<br />
www.curea-medical.de<br />
www.drawtex.com<br />
Flen pharma NV<br />
www.flenpharma.com<br />
Nutricia Advanced<br />
Medical Nutrition<br />
www.nutricia.com<br />
Organogenesis<br />
Switzerland GmbH<br />
www.organogenesis.com<br />
Wound Management<br />
Smith & Nephew Medical Ltd<br />
www.smith-nephew.com/wound<br />
Sorbion AG<br />
www.sorbion.com<br />
Systagenix Wound Management<br />
www.systagenix.com<br />
Phytoceuticals<br />
www.1wound.info<br />
Argentum Medical LLC<br />
www.silverlon.com<br />
Söring<br />
www.soering.com<br />
Laboratoires Urgo<br />
www.urgo.com<br />
Welcare Industries SPA<br />
www.welcaremedical.com<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2
Conference Calendar<br />
Conferences Theme <strong>2012</strong> Days City Country<br />
Chronic Wounds Initiative (ICW) Annual Congress <strong>May</strong> 9-10 Bremen Germany<br />
Congress of the Swiss Association for Wound Care (French section) <strong>May</strong> 10 Morges Switzerland<br />
22nd Conference of the<br />
European Wound Management Association<br />
13th European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics<br />
and Traumatology (EFORT) Congress<br />
German Society of Wound Healing and Wound Treatment (DGfW)<br />
Annual Meeting<br />
Wound healing – different<br />
perspectives, one goal<br />
<strong>May</strong> 23-25 Vienna Austria<br />
<strong>May</strong> 23-25 Berlin Germany<br />
Jun 14-16 Kassel Germany<br />
The 2nd Euro-Asian Forum of Association for Wound management Jun <strong>24</strong>-29 Sarajevo Bosnia and<br />
Herzegovina<br />
International Lymphoedema Framework <strong>2012</strong> Conference (ILF) Jun 28-30 Montpellier France<br />
4th Congress of the World Union of Wound Healing Societies Better care – Better Life Sep 2-6 Yokohama Japan<br />
The Annual Spring Symposium on Advanced Wound Care (SAWC/WHS) Sep 12-14 Baltimore USA<br />
15th Annual European Pressure Ulcer Meeting (EPUAP) Sep 18-21 Cardiff United Kingdom<br />
SAfW Symposium Swiss Association for Wound Care (SAfW)<br />
Symposium (German section)<br />
Sep 20 Zürich Switzerland<br />
31st Annual meeting of the European Bone and Joint Infection Society Sep 20-22 Montreux Switzerland<br />
The 12th Annual Leg Club Conference Sep 26-27 Worcester United Kingdom<br />
11th National Congress of Italian Association for the Study of<br />
Cutaneous Ulcers (AIUC)<br />
Sep 26-29 Rimini Italy<br />
10th Scientific Meeting of Diabetic Foot Study Group (DFSG) Sep 28-30 Berlin-Potsdam Germany<br />
National Congress of the Belgian Federation of Wound Care (BEFEWO) Oct Uccle Belgium<br />
4th Scientific Congress of the Polish Wound Management Association (PWMA) Oct 3-6 Bydgoszcz Poland<br />
1st National Multidisciplinary Congress for Wound Professionals Oct 8-9 Ede Netherlands<br />
Pisa International Diabetic Foot Courses Oct 8-11 Pisa Italy<br />
Croatian Wound Association (CWA) Symposium Oct <strong>24</strong>-26 Primosten Croatia<br />
Sympoisum APTFeridas <strong>2012</strong> Oct 25-26 Portugal<br />
GNEAUPP Biennial Meeting Pressure Ulcers and<br />
Chronic Wounds<br />
Nov 14-16 Sevilla Spain<br />
The Neuropathic Osteoarthropathic Foot (Charcot Foot Course) Nov 15-17 Rheine Germany<br />
Danish Wound Healing Society (DSFS) Annual Meeting Nov 22-23 Kolding Denmark<br />
International Congress for Wound Management of<br />
the Serbian Wound Healing Society SWHS<br />
The French and Francophone Society of Wounds and Wound<br />
Healing annual conference<br />
Chronic Wounds, Current<br />
Treatment – Outcomes<br />
Nov 23-<strong>24</strong> Belgrade Serbia<br />
2013<br />
Jan 20-22 Paris France<br />
23rd Conference of the European Wound Management Association <strong>May</strong> 15-17 Copenhagen Denmark<br />
For web addresses please visit www.ewma.org<br />
Organisations<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 73
Contact:<br />
Pam Landaiche<br />
pam@DFCon.com<br />
The next DFCon meeting<br />
is set for<br />
March 21-23, 2013,<br />
again at the<br />
Renaissance Hollywood<br />
Hotel in Los Angeles.<br />
For further information,<br />
visit www.DFCon.com.<br />
Diabetes and diabetic foot experts from around the<br />
globe met March 15-17, <strong>2012</strong>, at the tenth DFCon<br />
Global Diabetic Foot Conference in Los Angeles to<br />
share ideas on how to prevent lower limb amputations<br />
due to the complications of diabetes.<br />
10th DFCon<br />
Global Diabetic Foot Conference<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> President Jan Apelqvist receives Diabetic Foot Award<br />
<strong>2012</strong> Edward James Olmos Award for Advocacy in<br />
Amputation Prevention winner Jan Apelqvist, MD, PhD of<br />
Malmö, Sweden (seated9. Also pictured are (previous<br />
honorees and the actor for whom the award was named):<br />
Benjamin A. Lipsky, Peter R. Cavanagh, Gary W. Gibbons,<br />
Edward James Olmos; Karel Bakker, Andrew J.M. Boulton,<br />
Joseph L. Mills Sr., and conference co-chairman George<br />
Andros.<br />
Diabetic foot experts attend global meeting<br />
to share ideas on amputation prevention<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> is proud to announce that the <strong>EWMA</strong><br />
President, MD, PHD Jan Apelqvist, received the<br />
“<strong>2012</strong> Edward James Olmos Award for advocacy in<br />
amputation prevention” at the Diabetic Foot Global<br />
conference in Los Angeles 15-17 March <strong>2012</strong>.<br />
Motivating the choice of Jan Apelqvist as this years<br />
winner the conference co-chairs Dr. David G. Armstrong<br />
and George Andros said that: “Dr. Phd Jan<br />
Apelqvist Senior Consultant, Department of Endocrinology,<br />
Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden<br />
is one of the world’s most distinguished experts<br />
on the diabetic foot, diabetes- related complications<br />
and wound management, a noted researcher, a<br />
skilled clinician, a prolific author and a respected<br />
educator.”<br />
In his speech of thanks Dr. Jan Apelqvist stressed<br />
the role of the whole team from the Diabetic foot<br />
unit at the Endocrinological department in Lund<br />
and Malmö, Sweden. He also expressed his understanding<br />
of the value of the award as being not primarily<br />
the honoring of various experts – but rather<br />
the fact that the diabetic foot care gains attention<br />
through this award.<br />
Specialists from 39 U.S. states and 35 foreign<br />
countries attended DFCon <strong>2012</strong>.<br />
Portal Education broadcast educational<br />
sessions of the meeting live worldwide, and video<br />
of the education will be streamed on the DFCon<br />
website at www.DFCon.com.<br />
DFCon conference co-chairmen Drs. David G. Armstrong and George Andros lead a panel discussion on the opening day of DFCon <strong>2012</strong>.<br />
74<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2
AAWC<br />
Association for<br />
the Advancement<br />
of Wound Care<br />
Terry Treadwell, MD<br />
President, AAWC<br />
www.aawconline.org<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> international<br />
Partner Organisation<br />
The Association for<br />
the Advancement of Wound Care<br />
Greetings from your wound care colleagues at the<br />
Association for the Advancement of Wound Care,<br />
the AAWC, in the United States. This is an exciting<br />
time for us in that we are helping celebrate the<br />
25th Anniversary of the Symposium on Advanced<br />
Wound Care, our multidisciplinary wound care conference<br />
which is being held in Atlanta, Georgia,<br />
USA, this month. This conference has had a great<br />
impact in providing multi-specialty wound care education<br />
to practitioners in the United States.<br />
We know that education is indispensable for us to<br />
be able to help people with wounds. In an attempt<br />
to determine the educational needs of the healthcare<br />
providers practicing wound care, an exam asking<br />
basic questions about wound care was developed<br />
and given in selected areas around the United<br />
States in 2011 which one hundred ninety-five practitioners<br />
including nurses, physicians, physical therapists,<br />
and nurse practitioners took. Deficiencies<br />
were most apparent in the areas of wound infection,<br />
compression therapy, and diabetic foot ulcer<br />
management. It was very eye-opening to see the<br />
lack of knowledge of the people who take care of<br />
patients with wounds.<br />
It is obvious that we must strive to correct these<br />
educational deficiencies in our colleagues. In my<br />
last communication to you, I mentioned the<br />
AAWC’s involvement in providing web-based educational<br />
modules for our members. This program<br />
has been well received and is due for expansion this<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> 2013<br />
15 -17 <strong>May</strong> 2013<br />
year; however, it is obvious that many other types of<br />
educational programs must be developed and distributed<br />
to educate those who take care of patients<br />
with wounds.<br />
In addition to education, it is important for us to<br />
take advantage of opportunities to help wound care<br />
providers in countries with few resources. The Global<br />
Volunteers program of the AAWC directed by<br />
Dr. Tom Serena has been instrumental in sending<br />
volunteers to selected locations around the world to<br />
teach local healthcare providers the basics of good<br />
wound care. The program has recently added a site<br />
in Haiti where volunteers can visit, work, and teach<br />
in addition to our sites in India and Cambodia. This<br />
program is available to all of you who wish to volunteer<br />
and work with us.<br />
The AAWC has recently partnered with the Debra<br />
Foundation to provide assistance and support to<br />
patients and families suffering from epidermolysis<br />
bullosa. Involvement with this program will give our<br />
members a chance to share their knowledge to<br />
help patients with this terrible disease and to provide<br />
support to their families.<br />
We strive to accomplish both of these goals—to<br />
provide wound care education to wound care providers<br />
here and around the world and to serve<br />
wound patients and their families who will benefit<br />
from our knowledge and service. Won’t you join us<br />
in this project?<br />
Danish Wound<br />
Healing Society<br />
COPENHAGEN<br />
Denmark<br />
WWW.<strong>EWMA</strong>2013.ORG<br />
Organisations<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 75
Organisations<br />
AWMA<br />
The Australian<br />
Wound Management<br />
Association<br />
Dr Bill McGuiness<br />
President<br />
www.awma.com.au<br />
www.awma<strong>2012</strong>.com<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> international<br />
Partner Organisation<br />
76<br />
The Australian Wound Management<br />
Association national conference<br />
The Australian Wound Management Association<br />
(AWMA) national conference is held every two<br />
years in different capital cities in each state.<br />
The principal aim of the conference is to establish<br />
an agenda that the Association will prosecute over<br />
the next two years.<br />
The 9th conference was recently held at The Sydney<br />
Convention Centre using the theme “Harbouring<br />
Wound Care – integument, integrity and innovation”<br />
Some 700 delegates from seven different<br />
countries attended. It was the first national conference<br />
held since AWMA assumed a single national<br />
identify and logo. The aim to be recognised as a<br />
national peak body for wound care was established<br />
at the 2010 conference and culminated at the<br />
above conference with the launch of the new logo.<br />
More details can be found at our web site<br />
(www.awma.com.au).<br />
The scientific program for the <strong>2012</strong> conference<br />
(www.awma<strong>2012</strong>.com) was designed to focus on<br />
four integrated concepts:<br />
n Principles don’t’ change only resources<br />
n Resources are garnished by demonstrating<br />
efficacy via evidence<br />
n Ethical practitioners change patients situation by<br />
adopting best practice and lobbying government<br />
for resources<br />
n Wound care in 2020.<br />
On day one participants were reminded via a<br />
number of plenary and concurrent sessions that<br />
principles such as keeping the wound bed clean,<br />
maintaining a moist interface and controlling<br />
oedema were essential platforms for wound<br />
management. Recent research and innovations<br />
regarding the reduction of biofilms, lymphatic<br />
drainage and proteolytic indicators supported this<br />
theme. Maintaining the principles in resource poor<br />
countries was also visited by presentations from clinicians<br />
working with disadvantaged cohorts both<br />
internationally and within the Australasian context.<br />
Using evidence to garnish resources was a common<br />
theme on the second day of the conference. It built<br />
on the recent release of the Pan Pacific Pressure<br />
Injury Guidelines and the Australian and New<br />
Zealand Venous Leg Ulcer Guidelines in October<br />
2011. Plenary sessions by Dr Zena Moore, Prof<br />
David Leaper and Prof Keith Harding set the scene<br />
to explore a definition of evidence, the use of<br />
evidence in practice and research required in the<br />
future. It also encouraged participants to become<br />
active lobbyists to ensure that government provided<br />
required resources to implement best practice. To<br />
support this theme a preconference workshop was<br />
dedicated to the development of a consensus paper<br />
on conservative sharp debridement in the Australian<br />
context.<br />
The day also introduced the <strong>2012</strong> AWMA wound<br />
awareness campaign; “hop into compression”<br />
aimed at obtaining subsides for compression therapy.<br />
To strengthen the campaign AWMA is joining<br />
forces with the Australian Lymphology Association.<br />
The final day was devoted to future trends in wound<br />
care. Presentations about new research being<br />
undertaken by the Australian Wound Innovation<br />
CRC provided some exciting insights into new technologies<br />
and interventions on the horizon. New<br />
approaches to service delivery models and alternative<br />
models for education were also explored. The<br />
final session was dedicated to some crystal ball<br />
gazing and exploring the impacts on wound care in<br />
2020.<br />
In true Australian tradition the conference was not<br />
all work. Several social activities ensured that participants<br />
had the correct work-life balance. The dinner<br />
cruise also hosted the inaugural “AWMAs got<br />
talent contest” which is set to become a regular<br />
forum for state to state rivalry in the future.<br />
The AWMA <strong>2012</strong> to 2014 agenda is now set.<br />
Increasing awareness that wound management<br />
principals don’t change-only resources, effective<br />
lobbying for resources via the generation of new<br />
evidence and an active campaign to influence<br />
government, in particular for subsidised compression<br />
therapy.<br />
The next conference will be held at the Gold Coast,<br />
Queensland in 2014 so I would encourage all<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> members to joins us in the sun and set the<br />
AWMA agenda for 2014 to 2016.<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2
See the complete details online including continuing education statements,<br />
learning objectives, session descriptions, faculty credentials, information<br />
for submitting oral and poster abstracts, and registration information.<br />
2-K041
Organisations<br />
DEBRA<br />
International<br />
John Dart<br />
DEBRA House<br />
www.debra.org.uk<br />
www.debra-<br />
international.org<br />
debra@debra.org.uk<br />
or<br />
john.dart@debra.org.uk<br />
DEBRA International<br />
actively seeks collaboration<br />
with health care<br />
professionals and industry<br />
and would welcome<br />
contact with any <strong>EWMA</strong><br />
members who are<br />
interested in our work.<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> international<br />
Partner Organisation<br />
DEBRA International<br />
DEBRA International is the international association<br />
of epidermolysis bullosa (EB) patient support<br />
groups and, since the characteristic feature of EB is<br />
severe wounds that are frequently very hard to heal,<br />
the synergies with the work of <strong>EWMA</strong> are obvious.<br />
Consequently, we were delighted to be invited<br />
to become an International Partner Organisation<br />
and to have had the opportunity to present our<br />
clinical work at at the last two annual conferences<br />
and to have this chance to describe our current<br />
activities. The Centre of Expertise in Austria, the EB<br />
House in Salzburg, will be hosting a session on EB<br />
at the Vienna <strong>EWMA</strong> conference and there will be<br />
a DEBRA International stand in the exhibition area<br />
so we look forward to seeing many of you then.<br />
DEBRA International is currently working in over 40<br />
countries, through national EB patient groups, with<br />
strong representation in Europe, North and South<br />
America and Australasia and with a growing membership<br />
in Asia. The objectives of the organisation<br />
are to do together those things that are best<br />
achieved on a regional or world level and to assist<br />
member groups to do better those things that can<br />
only be done nationally and locally.<br />
Our current priority areas of work are:<br />
n funding and facilitating research to develop<br />
innovative treatments including gene, cell,<br />
protein and small molecule therapies; DEBRA<br />
International is unusual in that it has a single<br />
system of international peer review used by all of<br />
the National DEBRAs that fund research so that<br />
best use can be made of the € 3-5 M invested<br />
each year by member groups. A research<br />
planning conference is held every three years,<br />
involving the leading research teams worldwide,<br />
to identify opportunities and barriers to therapy<br />
development.<br />
n Identifying potential partners in industry and<br />
venture capital, whose involvement will be<br />
needed to successfully translate the promising<br />
work in a number of potential therapies from the<br />
laboratory into the clinic.<br />
n the generation of best clinical practice guidelines<br />
in various areas of importance to people with<br />
EB; a guideline on best practice in dental care<br />
has been completed and guidelines on cancer<br />
management, pain management, nutrition,<br />
physical therapies and wound care are in<br />
preparation.<br />
n the establishment of a clinical training programme<br />
for professionals interested in establishing,<br />
or improving, a specialist EB clinical service<br />
in their own countries, including an online,<br />
modular course coupled with mentoring.<br />
n creating stronger clinical networks of specialist<br />
EB centres to promote sharing of expertise and<br />
facilitate clinical trials<br />
n creating an international database of patients<br />
with EB to understand better the natural history<br />
of different types of EB and the costs of living<br />
with the condition.<br />
Submit your paper to <strong>EWMA</strong> Journal<br />
78<br />
Published by<br />
EUROPEAN<br />
WOUND MANAGEMENT<br />
ASSOCIATION<br />
www.ewma.org<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2
Journal of Tissue Viability<br />
Journal of Tissue Viability is a quarterly journal concerned<br />
with all aspects of the occurrence and treatment of wounds,<br />
ulcers and pressure sores including patient care, pain, nutrition,<br />
wound healing, research, prevention, mobility, social problems<br />
and management.<br />
The Journal particularly encourages papers covering skin and<br />
skin wounds but will consider articles that discuss injury in any<br />
tissue. Articles that stress the multi-professional nature of<br />
tissue viability are especially welcome. We seek to encourage<br />
new authors as well as well-established contributors to the fi<br />
eld - one aim of the journal is to enable all participants in tissue<br />
viability to share information with colleagues.<br />
We are excited to invite you to publish in Journal of Tissue<br />
Viability, an international, peer reviewed journal.<br />
For more information visit: www.journaloftissueviability.com<br />
TYPES OF PAPERS<br />
• Clinical Study<br />
• Basic Research Study<br />
• Case Report<br />
• Review Articles<br />
• Letters to the Editor<br />
ABSTRACTED & INDEXED IN:<br />
• BioInfoBank Library<br />
• Medline<br />
• PubMed<br />
• Science Direct<br />
• Scopus<br />
Call for Papers<br />
Submit your paper online now! http://ees.elsevier.com/jtv<br />
ISSN: 0965-206X<br />
Offi cial Journal of the Tissue Viability Society.<br />
Editor in Chief:<br />
D. Bader, Southampton, UK<br />
International editorial board:<br />
C. Dealey, UK<br />
L. Edsberg, USA<br />
A. Gefen, Israel<br />
S. Hagisawa, Japan<br />
A. Nelson, UK<br />
J. Nixon, UK<br />
H. Partsch, Austria<br />
M. Romanello, Italy<br />
L. Schoonhoven, Netherlands<br />
L. Stockton, UK<br />
J. Swaine, Australia<br />
T. Young, UK
EPUAP<br />
European<br />
Pressure Ulcer<br />
Advisory Panel<br />
Michael Clark<br />
President, EPUAP<br />
www.epuap.org<br />
80<br />
News from the<br />
European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel<br />
The European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel<br />
(EPUAP) will hold its 15th Annual Meeting in<br />
Cardiff, Wales over September 18th - 21st <strong>2012</strong>.<br />
The theme of this year’s meeting will be ‘Identifying<br />
research gaps and clinical needs in pressure ulcer<br />
prevention and management’.<br />
Who cares about pressure ulcers? – We do!’<br />
During the conference several areas will be<br />
explored including:<br />
n The new PUCLAS classification on line tool<br />
n Microclimate and moisture lesions<br />
n Incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD)<br />
n Pressure ulcer guideline implementation:<br />
clinical drivers versus financial drivers<br />
n International guideline adaptation<br />
– the Belgian, Netherlands & UK experience<br />
n Superficial versus deep infection in pressure<br />
ulcers, diagnosis and management<br />
n Pain and pressure ulcers<br />
Important new sections of the conference will provide<br />
an opportunity for <strong>EWMA</strong> and the EPUAP to<br />
collaborate together upon a joint session. The<br />
conference will close with a live link to the Cardiff<br />
Complex Wound Clinic when delegates will be able<br />
to interact with complex wound management in<br />
action.<br />
Cardiff has been chosen as the venue for the<br />
EPUAP <strong>2012</strong> conference venue for two main reasons<br />
– the first President of the EPUAP, Professor<br />
Keith Harding has been based in Cardiff throughout<br />
the majority of his professional life in wound<br />
healing and it was fitting on our 15th anniversary to<br />
visit the city where many development and initiatives<br />
in wound management began. Secondly there<br />
is vibrant research, clinical and commercial activity<br />
in Wales related to pressure ulcers and wider<br />
wound healing with the Welsh Government recognising<br />
wound healing as a major success in the<br />
country’s bio-science activities. So the <strong>2012</strong> EPUAP<br />
conference is coming to a city that has been long<br />
associated with the EPUAP and will help contribute<br />
to the growing awareness of wounds as a strength<br />
of Wales.<br />
One topic that will be discussed during the Cardiff<br />
conference is the EPUAP’s role in promoting a Stop<br />
Pressure Ulcer Day across Europe. In recent years<br />
we have seen ’Stop Pressure Ulcer’ Days occurring<br />
in Spanish and Portuguese speaking countries and<br />
last year organisations in Europe and Latin America<br />
created a Declaration in Rio speaking out against<br />
people developing pressure ulcers (www.silauhe.<br />
org/es/?file=kop1.php).<br />
In <strong>2012</strong> there will again be a Stop Pressure Ulcer<br />
Day to be held on November 16th <strong>2012</strong>. The European<br />
Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel applauds the<br />
efforts of such events to bring pressure ulcers to the<br />
public, the professionals and our politicians and has<br />
decided to participate in this even in <strong>2012</strong>. During<br />
the Cardiff <strong>2012</strong> conference there will be a meeting<br />
with other interested wound organisations to help<br />
co-ordinate the Stop Pressure Ulcer Day. Let’s take<br />
the opportunity to remind colleagues, the public<br />
and our politicians about the need to reduce the<br />
burden of pressure ulcers across Europe.<br />
To find more information on the project<br />
please visit the website:<br />
www.epuap.org/news/stop-pressure-ulcer-day/<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2
Latin American Activities on Prevention of Pressure Ulcers<br />
Last October, the executive of the Ibero Latin-American Society<br />
for Ulcers and Wounds (Sociedad Iberolatinoamericana<br />
sobre Úlceras y Heridas, SILAUHE) gave a “green light” to<br />
two projects, both directly related to the Prevention of Pressure<br />
Ulcers:<br />
Firstly, the “Declaration of Rio de Janeiro”, requires, as a<br />
universal right of all people, prevention of these episodes and<br />
discussion of the lines of action to undertake.<br />
Secondly, the announcement of a “World Day for Prevention<br />
of Pressure Ulcers”, scheduled for next November<br />
16th. On this topic, SILAUHE would like to invite all scientific<br />
organizations and Health Care Officials from Latin America<br />
and Europe, to adopt this event as yours, as formal recognition<br />
that the problem of Pressure Ulcers is evident and<br />
important as regards the implications for the quality of life of<br />
Organisations<br />
people who suffer from ulcers, the increased risk of morbidmortality<br />
and the high economic impact on society; and in<br />
particular, to bring to everyone’s attention that today it is<br />
possible, with the right treatment, to prevent almost all cases.<br />
It is hoped that these two projects have resonance and<br />
impact on the first World Prevention of Pressure Ulcers Day,<br />
and we hope that, in the future, we will have many more<br />
issues and projects and that many national and international<br />
organizations in the field of health and human rights, scientific<br />
societies and society as a whole will participate as partners<br />
or stakeholders in the fight against pressure ulcers.<br />
Written by Jose Verdú Soriano,<br />
on the executive of GNEAUPP, trustee at EPUAP and<br />
a member of <strong>EWMA</strong> Council<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 81
Cooperating Organisations<br />
AFIScep.be<br />
French Nurses’ Association in Stoma Therapy,<br />
Wound Healing and Wounds<br />
www.afiscep.be<br />
AISLeC<br />
Italian Nurses’ Cutaneous Wounds Association<br />
www.aislec.it<br />
AIUC<br />
Italian Association for the study of Cutaneous Ulcers<br />
www.aiuc.it<br />
APTFeridas<br />
Portuguese Association for the Treatment of Wounds<br />
www.aptferidas.com<br />
AWA<br />
Austrian Wound Association<br />
www.a-w-a.at<br />
BEFEWO<br />
Belgian Federation of Woundcare<br />
www.befewo.org<br />
BWA<br />
Bulgarian Wound Association<br />
www.woundbulgaria.org<br />
CNC<br />
Clinical Nursing Consulting – Wondzorg<br />
www.wondzorg.be<br />
CSLR<br />
Czech Wound Management Society<br />
www.cslr.cz<br />
CWA<br />
Croatian Wound Association<br />
www.huzr.hr<br />
DGfW<br />
German Wound Healing Society<br />
www.dgfw.de<br />
Associated Organisations<br />
Leg Club<br />
Lindsay Leg Club Foundation<br />
www.legclub.org<br />
LSN<br />
The Lymphoedema<br />
Support Network<br />
www.lymphoedema.org/lsn<br />
For more information about<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong>’s Cooperating Organisations<br />
please visit www.ewma.org<br />
82<br />
Danish Wound DSFS<br />
Healing Society Danish Wound Healing Society<br />
www.saar.dk<br />
FWCS<br />
Finnish Wound Care Society<br />
www.suomenhaavanhoitoyhdistys.fi<br />
GAIF<br />
Associated Group of Research in Wounds<br />
www.gaif.net<br />
GNEAUPP<br />
National Advisory Group for the Study of Pressure<br />
Ulcers and Chronic Wounds<br />
www.gneaupp.org<br />
ICW<br />
Chronic Wounds Initiative<br />
www.ic-wunden.de<br />
LBAA<br />
Latvian Wound Treating Organisation<br />
LUF<br />
The Leg Ulcer Forum<br />
www.legulcerforum.org<br />
LWMA<br />
Lithuanian Wound Management Association<br />
www.lzga.lt<br />
MASC<br />
Maltese Association of Skin and Wound Care<br />
www.mwcf.madv.org.mt/<br />
MSKT<br />
Hungarian Wound Care Society<br />
www.euuzlet.hu/mskt/<br />
International Partner Organisations<br />
AWMA<br />
Australian Wound Management<br />
Association<br />
www.awma.com.au<br />
AAWC<br />
Association for the Advancement<br />
of Wound Care<br />
www.aawconline.org<br />
Debra International<br />
Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa<br />
Research Association<br />
www.debra.org.uk<br />
EFORT<br />
European Federation of National<br />
Associations of Orthopaedics<br />
and Traumatology<br />
www.efort.org<br />
MWMA<br />
Macedonian Wound Management Association<br />
ILF<br />
International Lymphoedema<br />
Framework<br />
www.lympho.org<br />
NZWCS<br />
New Zealand Wound Care<br />
Society<br />
www.nzwcs.org.nz<br />
SOBENFeE<br />
Brazilian Wound<br />
Management Association<br />
www.sobenfee.org.br<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2
Other Collaborators<br />
NATVNS<br />
National Association of Tissue Viability Nurses,<br />
Scotland<br />
NIFS<br />
Norwegian Wound Healing Association<br />
www.nifs-saar.no<br />
NOVW<br />
Dutch Organisation of Wound Care Nurses<br />
www.novw.org<br />
PWMA<br />
Polish Wound Management Association<br />
www.ptlr.pl<br />
SAfW<br />
Swiss Association for Wound Care (German section)<br />
www.safw.ch<br />
SAfW<br />
Swiss Association for Wound Care (French section)<br />
www.safw-romande.ch<br />
SAWMA<br />
Serbian Advanced Wound Management Association<br />
www.lecenjerana.com<br />
SEBINKO<br />
Hungarian Association for the Improvement in Care<br />
of Chronic Wounds and Incontinentia<br />
www.sebinko.hu<br />
SEHER<br />
The Spanish Society of Wounds<br />
www.sociedadespanolaheridas.es<br />
SFFPC<br />
The French and Francophone Society<br />
f Wounds and Wound Healing<br />
www.sffpc.org<br />
SSiS<br />
Swedish Wound Care Nurses Association<br />
www.sarsjukskoterskor.se<br />
SSOOR<br />
Slovak Wound Care Association<br />
www.ssoor.sk<br />
DFSG<br />
Diabetic Foot Study Group<br />
www.dfsg.org<br />
EADV<br />
European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology<br />
www.eadv.org<br />
EBA<br />
European Burns Association<br />
www.euroburn.org<br />
EPUAP<br />
European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel<br />
www.epuap.org<br />
E T R S ETRS<br />
European Tissue Repair Society<br />
www.etrs.org<br />
STW Belarus<br />
Society for the Treatment of Wounds<br />
(Gomel, Belarus)<br />
www.burnplast.gomel.by<br />
SUMS<br />
Icelandic Wound Healing Society<br />
www.sums-is.org<br />
SWHS<br />
Serbian Wound Healing Society<br />
www.lecenjerana.com<br />
SWHS<br />
Swedish Wound Healing Society<br />
www.sarlakning.se<br />
TVS<br />
Tissue Viability Society<br />
www.tvs.org.uk<br />
URuBiH<br />
Association for Wound Management<br />
of Bosnia and Herzegovina<br />
www.urubih.ba<br />
UWTO<br />
Ukrainian Wound Treatment Organisation<br />
www.uwto.org.ua<br />
V&VN<br />
Decubitus and Wound Consultants, Netherlands<br />
www.venvn.nl<br />
WMAI<br />
Wound Management Association of Ireland<br />
www.wmai.ie<br />
WMAK<br />
Wound Management Association of Kosova<br />
WMAS<br />
Wound Management Association Slovenia<br />
www.dors.si<br />
WMAT<br />
Wound Management Association Turkey<br />
www.yaradernegi.net<br />
Organisations<br />
Eucomed<br />
Eucomed Advanced Wound Care Sector Group<br />
www.eucomed.org<br />
ICC<br />
International Compression Club<br />
www.icc-compressionclub.com<br />
MSF<br />
Médecins Sans Frontières<br />
www.msf.org<br />
WAWLC<br />
World Alliance for Wound and Lymphedema Care<br />
www.wawlc.org<br />
WUWHS<br />
The World Union of Wound Healing Societies<br />
www.wuwhs.org<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 83
5 Editorial<br />
Science, Practice and Education<br />
7 A structured approach to surgical treatment in deep<br />
infection in diabetic foot<br />
Cedomir S Vucetic, Javorka B Delic, Zoran S Vukasinovic,<br />
Goran Dz Tulic, Ivan K Dimitrijevic, Cedo Dj Vuckovic,<br />
Vesna K Kalezic<br />
15 Endothelial progenitor cells, a unipotent stem cell, involved<br />
in neovascularization of wound healing in diabetic foot ulcer<br />
Jacqueline Chor Wing Tama, Chun Hay Ko, Ping Chung Leung,<br />
Kwok Pui Fung, Clara Bik San Lau<br />
23 Bacteriophages for the treatment of severe infections:<br />
– a ‘new’ option for the future?<br />
Daniel De Vos, Gilbert Verbeken, Thomas Rose, Serge Jennes, Jean-<br />
Paul Pirnay<br />
31 Developing evidence-based ways of working:<br />
– Employing interdisciplinary team working to improve patient<br />
outcomes in diabetic foot ulceration – our experience<br />
Kristien Van Acker<br />
36 Exploring the characteristics of a venous leg ulcer that contribute<br />
to the emotional distress experienced by patients<br />
Jessica Walburn, John Weinman, Suzanne Scott, Kavita Vedhara<br />
39 Development of a wound healing index for chronic wounds<br />
Juan Carlos Restrepo-Medrano, José Verdú Soriano<br />
Cochrane Reviews<br />
49 Abstracts of Recent Cochrane Reviews<br />
Sally Bell-Syer<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong><br />
56 <strong>EWMA</strong> Journal Previous Issues and other Journals<br />
58 <strong>EWMA</strong> Teacher network<br />
Zena Moore<br />
58 Austrian Diabetic Foot Symposium, <strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
60 <strong>EWMA</strong> Update, The Patient Outcome Group<br />
Patricia Price<br />
62 We want to make a difference! – <strong>EWMA</strong> future projects<br />
Jan Apelqvist<br />
64 EU ‘Week For Life’<br />
Jan Apelqvist<br />
66 <strong>EWMA</strong> focus on multidisciplinarity in wound management<br />
Jan Apelqvist<br />
68 <strong>EWMA</strong> participation in EU Conference on Antimicrobials<br />
Resistance – it’s time to take joint action!<br />
Rytis Rimdeika<br />
70 Eucomed, Woundcare reflections on the EU 2020 strategy<br />
Hans Lundgren<br />
Organisations<br />
72 <strong>EWMA</strong> Corporate Sponsors<br />
73 Conference Calendar<br />
74 10th DFCon Global Diabetic Foot Conference.<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> President Jan Apelqvist receives Diabetic Foot Award.<br />
Diabetic Foot Experts Attend Global Meeting to Share Ideas<br />
on Amputation Prevention<br />
75 AAWC, The Association for the Advancement of<br />
Wound Care<br />
Terry Treadwell<br />
76 AWMA, The Australian Wound Management Association<br />
national conference<br />
Bill McGuiness<br />
78 DEBRA International<br />
John Dart<br />
80 EPUAP, News from the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory<br />
Panel – Latin American Activities on Prevention of Pressure<br />
Ulcers<br />
Michael Clark<br />
82 <strong>EWMA</strong> Cooperating Organisations