May 24, 2012 - EWMA

May 24, 2012 - EWMA May 24, 2012 - EWMA

28.01.2013 Views

MY FOOT Volume 12 Number 2 May 2012 Published by European Wound Management Association

MY FOOT<br />

Volume 12<br />

Number 2<br />

<strong>May</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

Published by<br />

European<br />

Wound Management<br />

Association


The <strong>EWMA</strong> Journal<br />

ISSN number: 1609-2759<br />

Volume 12, No 2, <strong>May</strong>, <strong>2012</strong><br />

Electronic Supplement <strong>May</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

www.ewma.org<br />

The Journal of the European<br />

Wound Management Association<br />

Published two times a year<br />

Editorial Board<br />

Sue Bale, UK, Editor<br />

Jan Apelqvist, Sweden<br />

Martin Koschnick, Germany<br />

Zena Moore, Ireland<br />

Marco Romanelli, Italy<br />

Rytis Rimdeika, Lithuania<br />

José Verdú Soriano, Spain<br />

Rita Gaspar Videira, Portugal<br />

Salla Seppänen, Finland<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> web site<br />

www.ewma.org<br />

Editorial Office<br />

please contact:<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Secretariat<br />

Nordre Fasanvej 113<br />

2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark.<br />

Tel: (+45) 7020 0305<br />

Fax: (+45) 7020 0315<br />

ewma@ewma.org<br />

Layout:<br />

Birgitte Clematide<br />

Printed by:<br />

CS Grafisk A/S, Denmark<br />

Copies printed: 12.000<br />

Prices:<br />

The <strong>EWMA</strong> Journal is distributed<br />

in hard copies to members<br />

as part of their <strong>EWMA</strong> membership.<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> also shares the vision of<br />

an “open access” philosophy,<br />

which means that the journal is<br />

freely available online.<br />

Individual subscription per issue: 7.50€<br />

Libraries and institutions per issue: 25€<br />

The next issue will be published<br />

in October <strong>2012</strong>. Prospective material for<br />

publication must be with the editors<br />

as soon as possible and no later<br />

than August 1st, <strong>2012</strong>.<br />

The contents of articles and letters in<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal do not necessarily reflect<br />

the opinions of the Editors or the<br />

European Wound Management Association.<br />

All scientific articles are peer reviewed by<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Scientific Review Panel.<br />

Copyright of published material<br />

and illustrations is the property of<br />

the European Wound Management<br />

Association. However, provided prior<br />

written consent for their reproduction,<br />

including parallel publishing<br />

(e.g. via repository), obtained from <strong>EWMA</strong><br />

via the Editorial Board of the Journal,<br />

and proper acknowledgement and<br />

printed, such permission will normally<br />

be readily granted. Requests to<br />

reproduce material should state<br />

where material is to be published,<br />

and, if it is abstracted, summarised,<br />

or abbreviated, then the proposed<br />

new text should be sent to the<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal Editor for final approval.<br />

2<br />

All issues of <strong>EWMA</strong> Journal<br />

are CINAHL listed.<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong><br />

Council<br />

Sebastian Probst<br />

CO-OPERATING ORGANISATIONS’ BOARD<br />

Christian Thyse, AFISCeP.be<br />

Tommaso Bianchi, AISLeC<br />

Roberto Cassino, AIUC<br />

Aníbal Justiniano, APTFeridas<br />

Gerald Zöch, AWA<br />

Jan Vandeputte, BEFEWO<br />

Vladislav Hristov, BWA<br />

Els Jonckheere, CNC<br />

Lenka Veverková, CSLR<br />

Nastja Kucišec-Tepeš, CWA<br />

Martin Koschnick, DGfW<br />

Bo Jørgensen, DSFS<br />

Anna Hjerppe, FWCS<br />

Pedro Pacheco, GAIF<br />

J. Javier Soldevilla, GNEAUPP<br />

Corrado M. Durante<br />

Treasurer<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> JOURNAL SCIENTIFIC REVIEW PANEL<br />

Paulo Jorge Pereira Alves, Portugal<br />

Caroline Amery, UK<br />

Jan Apelqvist, Sweden<br />

Sue Bale, UK<br />

Michelle Briggs, UK<br />

Stephen Britland, UK<br />

Mark Collier, UK<br />

Rose Cooper, UK<br />

B. E. den Boogert-Ruimschotel, Netherlands<br />

Javorka Delic, Serbia<br />

Corrado Maria Durante, Italy<br />

Bulent Erdogan, Turkey<br />

Madeleine Flanagan, UK<br />

Milada Francu˚, Czech Republic<br />

Peter Franks, UK<br />

Francisco P. García-Fernández, Spain<br />

Jan Apelqvist<br />

President<br />

Gerrolt Jukema<br />

Recorder<br />

Christian Münter, ICW<br />

Aleksandra Kuspelo, LBAA<br />

Susan Knight, LUF<br />

Loreta Pilipaityte, LWMA<br />

Corinne Ward, MASC<br />

Hunyadi János, MSKT<br />

Suzana Nikolovska, MWMA<br />

Alison Johnstone, NATVNS<br />

Kristin Bergersen, NIFS<br />

Louk van Doorn, NOVW<br />

Arkadiusz Jawień, PWMA<br />

Severin Läuchli, SAfW (DE)<br />

Hubert Vuagnat, SAfW (FR)<br />

Goran D. Lazovic, SAWMA<br />

Mária Hok, SEBINKO<br />

Zena Moore<br />

Immediate Past President<br />

Patricia Price<br />

Secretary<br />

Paulo Alves Sue Bale<br />

Barbara E.<br />

Mark Collier Javorka Delic<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal Editor den Boogert-Ruimschotel<br />

Luc Gryson Eskild W. Henneberg Dubravko Huljev Nada Kecelj-Leskovec Martin Koschnick<br />

Elia Ricci Rytis Rimdeika Salla Seppänen Robert Strohal José Verdú Soriano<br />

Luc Gryson, Belgium<br />

Marcus Gürgen, Norway<br />

Eskild W. Henneberg, Denmark<br />

Alison Hopkins, UK<br />

Gabriela Hösl, Austria<br />

Dubravko Huljev, Croatia<br />

Gerrolt Jukema, Netherlands<br />

Nada Kecelj, Slovenia<br />

Klaus Kirketerp-Møller, Denmark<br />

Karsten Knobloch, Germany<br />

Zoltán Kökény, Hungary<br />

Martin Koschnick, Germany<br />

Severin Läuchli, Schwitzerland<br />

Maarten J. Lubbers, Netherlands<br />

Sylvie Meaume, France<br />

Zena Moore, UK<br />

F. Xavier Santos Heredero, SEHER<br />

Sylvie Meaume, SFFPC<br />

Susanne Dufva, SSIS<br />

Jozefa Košková, SSOOR<br />

Leonid Rubanov, STW (Belarus)<br />

Guðbjörg Pálsdóttir, SUMS<br />

Javorca Delic, SWHS Serbia<br />

Magnus Löndahl, SWHS Sweden<br />

Alison Hopkins, TVS<br />

Jasmina Begić-Rahić, URuBiH<br />

Zoya Ishkova, UWTO<br />

Barbara E. den Boogert-Ruimschotel, V&VN<br />

Georgina Gethin, WMAI<br />

Skender Zatriqi, WMAK<br />

Nada Kecelj Leskovec, WMAS<br />

Mustafa Deveci, WMAT<br />

Christian Münter, Germany<br />

Andrea Nelson, UK<br />

Pedro L. Pancorbo-Hidalgo, Spain<br />

Hugo Partsch, Austria<br />

Patricia Price, UK<br />

Sebastian Probst, Schwitzerland<br />

Elia Ricci, Italy<br />

Rytis Rimdeika, Lithuania<br />

Zbigniew Rybak, Poland<br />

Salla Seppänen, Finland<br />

José Verdú Soriano, Spain<br />

Robert Strohal, Austria<br />

Carolyn Wyndham-White, Switzerland<br />

Gerald Zöch, Austria


5 Editorial<br />

Science, Practice and Education<br />

7 A structured approach to surgical treatment in deep<br />

infection in diabetic foot<br />

Cedomir S Vucetic, Javorka B Delic, Zoran S Vukasinovic,<br />

Goran Dz Tulic, Ivan K Dimitrijevic, Cedo Dj Vuckovic,<br />

Vesna K Kalezic<br />

15 Endothelial progenitor cells, a unipotent stem cell, involved<br />

in neovascularization of wound healing in diabetic foot ulcer<br />

Jacqueline Chor Wing Tama, Chun Hay Ko, Ping Chung Leung,<br />

Kwok Pui Fung, Clara Bik San Lau<br />

23 Bacteriophages for the treatment of severe infections:<br />

– a ‘new’ option for the future?<br />

Daniel De Vos, Gilbert Verbeken, Thomas Rose, Serge Jennes, Jean-<br />

Paul Pirnay<br />

31 Developing evidence-based ways of working:<br />

– Employing interdisciplinary team working to improve patient<br />

outcomes in diabetic foot ulceration – our experience<br />

Kristien Van Acker<br />

36 Exploring the characteristics of a venous leg ulcer that contribute<br />

to the emotional distress experienced by patients<br />

Jessica Walburn, John Weinman, Suzanne Scott, Kavita Vedhara<br />

39 Development of a wound healing index for chronic wounds<br />

Juan Carlos Restrepo-Medrano, José Verdú Soriano<br />

Cochrane Reviews<br />

49 Abstracts of Recent Cochrane Reviews<br />

Sally Bell-Syer<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong><br />

56 <strong>EWMA</strong> Journal Previous Issues and other Journals<br />

58 <strong>EWMA</strong> Teacher network<br />

Zena Moore<br />

58 Austrian Diabetic Foot Symposium, <strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

60 <strong>EWMA</strong> Update, The Patient Outcome Group<br />

Patricia Price<br />

62 We want to make a difference! – <strong>EWMA</strong> future projects<br />

Jan Apelqvist<br />

64 EU ‘Week For Life’<br />

Jan Apelqvist<br />

66 <strong>EWMA</strong> focus on multidisciplinarity in wound management<br />

Jan Apelqvist<br />

68 <strong>EWMA</strong> participation in EU Conference on Antimicrobials<br />

Resistance – it’s time to take joint action!<br />

Rytis Rimdeika<br />

70 Eucomed, Woundcare reflections on the EU 2020 strategy<br />

Hans Lundgren<br />

Organisations<br />

72 <strong>EWMA</strong> Corporate Sponsors<br />

73 Conference Calendar<br />

74 10th DFCon Global Diabetic Foot Conference.<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> President Jan Apelqvist receives Diabetic Foot Award.<br />

Diabetic Foot Experts Attend Global Meeting to Share Ideas<br />

on Amputation Prevention<br />

75 AAWC, The Association for the Advancement of<br />

Wound Care<br />

Terry Treadwell<br />

76 AWMA, The Australian Wound Management Association<br />

national conference<br />

Bill McGuiness<br />

78 DEBRA International<br />

John Dart<br />

80 EPUAP, News from the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory<br />

Panel – Latin American Activities on Prevention of Pressure<br />

Ulcers<br />

Michael Clark<br />

82 <strong>EWMA</strong> Cooperating Organisations<br />

ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENT<br />

<strong>May</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

The <strong>May</strong> <strong>2012</strong> edition of the <strong>EWMA</strong> Journal<br />

Electronic Supplement consist<br />

of all the accepted abstracts for the <strong>EWMA</strong><br />

<strong>2012</strong> Conference in Vienna.<br />

It is divided into Oral presentations<br />

and Poster presentations and it<br />

is possible to download individual<br />

abstracts as well as the entire supplement<br />

(including all the abstracts) at<br />

www.ewma.org/english/ewma-journal/<br />

electronic-supplement.html<br />

WWW.<strong>EWMA</strong>.ORG<br />

3


Customised V.A.C. ®<br />

Therapy,<br />

for fewer blocks to wound healing.<br />

No two wounds are alike, so treatment options require maximum flexibility. Introducing V.A.C. VeraFlo Therapy,<br />

a customized approach to wound healing, now available with the new V.A.C.Ulta System. V.A.C. VeraFlo Therapy<br />

unites proven V.A.C. ® Therapy power with automated distribution and removal of wound irrigation solutions,<br />

addressing a variety of wound types. Together with specialized wound dressings and a<br />

streamlined user experience, it all combines to help remove the blocks to wound healing.<br />

Note: Specific indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions and safety information exist for KCI products and therapies.<br />

Please consult a physician and product instructions for use prior to application.<br />

©2010 KCI Licensing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. The MEGA BLOKS blocks are used with the permission of MEGA Brands Inc. All other trademarks are proprietary<br />

to KCI Licensing, Inc., its affiliates and/or licensors. This material intended for healthcare professionals. DSL#10-0299.EMEA (Rev. 2/12)


It is a great pleasure for me to introduce the<br />

theme of this issue of the <strong>EWMA</strong> Journal:<br />

The diabetic foot. This is not only because<br />

it is my area of expertise but also because it<br />

gives <strong>EWMA</strong> an opportunity to highlight<br />

some of the many important activities that<br />

have been initiated by the diabetic foot<br />

organisations in Europe and internationally,<br />

as well as the activities that <strong>EWMA</strong> is<br />

currently supporting.<br />

The diabetic foot will also be covered<br />

thoroughly during the <strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2012</strong> Conference<br />

in Vienna. In addition to a key<br />

session on the diabetic foot, an Austrian<br />

Diabetic Foot Symposium will be held on<br />

Thursday <strong>24</strong> <strong>May</strong>. The symposium is<br />

arranged in collaboration with AWA 1 ,<br />

DFSG 1 and IWGDF 1 and will focus on<br />

implementation of the IWGDF guidelines<br />

on management of the diabetic foot and<br />

offer international examples of the organisation<br />

of treatment.<br />

The diabetic foot counts for a substantial<br />

number of hard to heal ulcers treated in primary<br />

and secondary care settings throughout<br />

the world. Due to the high risk of amputations,<br />

long healing rates and risk of adverse<br />

Editorial<br />

1 Austrian Wound Association (AWA), Diabetic Foot Study Group (DFSG) and The International Working Group<br />

on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF)<br />

2 Apelqvist, J, Larsson, J: What is the most effective way to reduce incidence of amputation in the diabetic foot?,<br />

Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews, Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2000; 16 (Suppl 1); pp. 75-S83<br />

3 Driver Vickie R, Fabbi M, Lavery L A, Gibbons G: The cost of diabetic foot: The economic case for the limb<br />

salvage team, Journal of vascular surgery, September Supplement 2010<br />

events, treatment of the diabetic foot is a<br />

costly process which calls for involvement of<br />

many different disciplines and care settings<br />

2,3 . Without a well defined organisation<br />

of treatment, patients are often lost in the<br />

system. These challenges are similar with<br />

regards to all patients suffering from hard to<br />

heal ulcers.<br />

Thus the diabetic foot case illustrates the<br />

general need for interdisciplinary care as well<br />

as the need for a fundamental change in the<br />

health care system with regards to health<br />

economics and reimbursement strategies.<br />

In this issue of the <strong>EWMA</strong> Journal you will<br />

find two scientific articles on treatment of<br />

the diabetic foot as well as a background article<br />

on the effect of interdisciplinary teams on<br />

patient outcomes in diabetic foot ulceration.<br />

Throughout the journal you will also find<br />

information about different initiatives<br />

aiming to support improved prevention and<br />

treatment of the diabetic foot.<br />

We hope you will enjoy reading this issue.<br />

Jan Apelqvist, <strong>EWMA</strong> President<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 5


ETHICAL<br />

COLLABORATION<br />

IN HEALTHCARE<br />

CERTIFIED<br />

Licensed by Eucomed


A structured approach to<br />

surgical treatment in deep<br />

infection in diabetic foot<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Background: It is generally acknowledged that<br />

chronic wounds can take months or years to heal.<br />

Patients often need to undergo many therapeutic<br />

procedures to support and promote the best environment<br />

for healing, including the prevention<br />

and early treatment of bacterial load and infection.<br />

This is especially pertinent to the management<br />

of patients with diabetic foot ulceration,<br />

who are prone to osteomyelitis as the most common<br />

complication.<br />

Aim: The aim of this study is to test a surgical protocol<br />

applied in the treatment of bone infection<br />

and chronic wounds related to bone infection.<br />

Methods: In management of ulcers III­V level,<br />

Wagner classification, surgical treatment was applied.<br />

Surgical debridement and soft­tissue reconstruction<br />

were carried out.<br />

Results: Surgical treatment included 23 patients<br />

with ulcers. Ulcers were classified according the<br />

Wagner classification as level III 8 (34.5%),<br />

level IV 8 (34.5%) and level V 7 (30.4%). Surgical<br />

treatment included: surgical debridement<br />

23 patients (100%), bone resection 11 patients<br />

(47.8%), disarticulation 2 patients (8.7%), perfusion<br />

2 patients (8.7%), antibiotic instillation 3<br />

patients (13%), suture or approximation of the<br />

wound border lines 14 patients (60.9%). Duration<br />

of the treatment after operation until the<br />

wound healing and the end of the secernation<br />

were reached was overall 7.5 weeks (2­16 weeks).<br />

Conclusion: Surgical treatment includes the exploration<br />

of the changed bone and minimal resection<br />

which spares the bone. It is advisable to<br />

undertake surgical treatment without delay and<br />

additional diagnostic procedures. Surgical treatment,<br />

followed by local and systemic application<br />

of antibiotics, achieves shorter healing time and<br />

more successful patient outcomes.<br />

Key words: chronic wounds, osteomyelitis, diabetic<br />

foot ulcers, local antibiotics<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

It is generally acknowledged that chronic wounds<br />

can take months or years to heal. Patients often<br />

need to undergo many therapeutic procedures<br />

to support and promote the best environment<br />

for healing, including the prevention and early<br />

treatment of bacterial load and infection. This is<br />

especially pertinent to the management of patients<br />

with diabetic foot ulceration, who are prone to<br />

osteomyelitis as the most common complication.<br />

Chronic wounds have been defined as having<br />

multiple physiological impairments to healing,<br />

including: inadequate angiogenesis, impaired<br />

innervation, direct pressure, microcirculatory<br />

ischemia and impaired cellular migration, all of<br />

which may contribute to extensive morbidity 1 .<br />

The therapeutic possibilities are huge, often with<br />

big limitations and also including the amputation<br />

surgery. Chronic bone and joint infection is<br />

followed by appearance of fistulas, skin defects,<br />

metaplasia, and sometimes by malignant alteration,<br />

permanent or periodical secretion. Bone and<br />

joint infection appearance on the skin cannot be<br />

treated separately from general treatment of bone<br />

and joint infection (fig.1, 2, 3). Current treatment<br />

options for diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) include offloading<br />

to reduce pressure on the wound, wound<br />

care to prevent infections, and wound debridement<br />

to remove necrotic debris and re­stimulate<br />

the wound healing process 2 .<br />

Approximately 2­2.5% of patients with diabetes<br />

mellitus have complication on their feet 3,2 .<br />

If there are infected ulcers on feet, the level of<br />

osteomyelitis is high, 66% 4 . Among outpatients<br />

with diabetic foot the level of osteomyelitis appearance<br />

is 10­20% 5,6 .<br />

Diabetic foot ulcrs have osteomyelitis as the<br />

most common complication. It is also possible<br />

that osteomyelitis appears as a complication in soft<br />

tissue infection without the initial ulcers. Reduced<br />

circulation, tissue trophic and neuropathy result<br />

�<br />

Science, Practice and Education<br />

1,2 Cedomir S Vucetic,<br />

MD PhD<br />

3Javorka B Delic, MD,<br />

2,4Zoran S Vukasinovic,<br />

MD PhD,<br />

1,2 Goran Dz Tulic,<br />

MD PhD,<br />

2,5 Ivan K Dimitrijevic,<br />

MD PhD,<br />

1Cedo Dj Vuckovic,<br />

MD PhD<br />

2,6 Vesna K Kalezic,<br />

MD PhD<br />

1 Institute for Orthopaedic<br />

Surgery and Traumatology,<br />

Clinical Center of Serbia,<br />

Belgrade<br />

2 School of Medicine,<br />

University of Belgrade,<br />

Belgrade, Serbia<br />

3 Institute for Dermato-<br />

Venereal Diseases,<br />

Belgrade<br />

4 Institute of Orthopaedic<br />

Surgery Banjica, Belgrade<br />

5 Clinic for Psychiatry,<br />

Clinical Center of Serbia,<br />

Belgrade<br />

6 Clinic for endocrinology,<br />

diabetes and metabolic<br />

diseases, Clinical Center of<br />

Serbia, Belgrade<br />

Correspondence:<br />

cedomir.vucetic@<br />

gmail.com<br />

Conflict of interest: none<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

This work is supported by<br />

grant number III 41004,<br />

Ministry of Education and<br />

Science Republic of Serbia.<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 7


in the foot being vulnerable to infection. The early detection<br />

of the clinical signs of infection in the diabetic foot<br />

includes the evaluation of the foot for bone infection. The<br />

possibility of bone infection is significantly greater if there<br />

is a several weeks’ presence of soft tissue infection or fistula.<br />

Plain film radiography of the foot can usually show the<br />

bone exposure and signs of osteomyelitis. Primary phase<br />

or acute state can show bone demineralisation, diffuse<br />

lytic changes on the bone, localised circular changes or<br />

confluent changes, with or without sclerotic parts of the<br />

bone. Chronic osteomyelitis form comes with sequestra<br />

and with more expressive sclerotic and osteolitic parts of<br />

the bone. There are several clinical signs of osteomyelitis:<br />

swelling and the ’sausage’ look of the finger; probe­to­bone<br />

test; deep ulcer.<br />

Laboratory indicators of infection are higher sedimentation<br />

of erythrocytes (SE), higher number of leukocytes,<br />

C­reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin, bacteriological<br />

smear examination, bone biopsy for bacteriological<br />

and histological examination, repeated radiographic examination,<br />

bone scintigraphy ( 99m Tc diphosphonate),<br />

labelled autologous leucocyte scanning ( 111 In oxine or<br />

99m Tc­HMPAO), antigranulocyte scintigraphy (AGS),<br />

computed tomographic (CT), and magnetic resonance<br />

imaging (MRI) 3,7,8 .<br />

Therapeutic strategies:<br />

Literature describes various approaches to osteomyelitis<br />

healing in diabetic foot. Surgical exploration of infected<br />

part of the bone and bone resection until reaching the<br />

healthy part are marked as the traditional surgical approach.<br />

The advantages of this surgical approach are radically<br />

removing the bone changed by infection and faster<br />

healing. The disadvantages are more bone removed than<br />

necessary, possible disturbance of the foot biomechanics,<br />

and greater surgical procedure.<br />

Conservative surgery in osteomyelitis healing in diabetic<br />

foot is an approach in which only the sequestra are<br />

removed with very limited bone removal. The advantage<br />

of this kind of healing is greater savings but the risk is<br />

longer healing times.<br />

Healing supported by the use of dressings and followed<br />

by systemic antibiotic therapy, can achieve the wanted<br />

result of healing even in 85% of osteomyelitis. Healing<br />

by antibiotics alone prolongs healing time to/by 12­<strong>24</strong><br />

weeks 3 .<br />

AIM:<br />

The aim of this study is to evaluate the surgical protocol<br />

applied in treatment of bone infection and chronic<br />

wounds, which are related to bone infection in the treatment<br />

of diabetic foot ulcers.<br />

8<br />

a b<br />

c<br />

e<br />

g<br />

Figure 1:<br />

1a. Female, 44 years, osteomyelitis, phalange distal et proximal<br />

big toe, fistula of the dorsum;<br />

1b. Plantar ulcer, purulent secernation seven months<br />

1c, d. Rtg. pre-operative joint subluxation interphalangeal<br />

1e, f. Operative exploration, sequestrectomy, fistula excision,<br />

sutural, continual lavage<br />

1g, h, Condition 2 months post-operatively<br />

Description of the surgical protocol:<br />

Surgical protocol applied in this study included: 1. surgical<br />

debridement, 2. reconstruction, with the aim of closing<br />

the operative wound as much as possible, 3. application<br />

of antibiotics locally, and 4. surgical procedures of wound<br />

covering with the transplantates or with local flap applied<br />

when needed,. Surgical debridement included: exploration<br />

of the part affected by infection; debridement of devitalised<br />

tissues, sequestra and infected joints and bones. Reconstruction<br />

with the aim of closing the operative wound<br />

was also part of the surgical plan, as much as it was possible.<br />

Local application of antibiotics was enabled by setting<br />

the catheter for continual instillation of antibiotics.<br />

If it was possible, the drain was also set. The additional<br />

procedure of skin defect covering was applied if there was<br />

a need for it after the resolution of infection.<br />

d<br />

f<br />

h<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2


a<br />

c<br />

Figure 2:<br />

2a. Male, 67 years. Condition after the amputation of<br />

IV finger and resection of the V MT bone<br />

2b. Rtg after the second operation resection of IV and<br />

V MT bone<br />

2c. condition one week after the operation, debridement<br />

and approximation of wound’s lines with local instillation of<br />

antibiotics<br />

2d. condition 5 weeks after the operation<br />

METHODS<br />

Ulcers on diabetic foot level III­V, according to Wagner,<br />

were surgically treated. The applied osteomyelitis treatment<br />

at diabetic foot is the synthesis of surgical treatment<br />

which intends to save as much as possible while carrying<br />

out necessary debridement and providing the necessary<br />

conditions for wound healing. Practically, that meant the<br />

use of minimally invasive surgery, which included debri­<br />

Table 1. Infection clasification in diabetic according the intensity and form criteria<br />

Acute infection<br />

Chronic infection<br />

Low intensity it appears suddenly,<br />

looks like basical ulcer with<br />

after the minor injury,<br />

smaller secernation, without typical<br />

only some signs of inflammation clinical signs of infection, long lasting,<br />

smaller secernation<br />

can be treated non-operatively<br />

High intensity febrility, sepsis, colour and without local swelling and colour,<br />

swelling of entire foot,<br />

with ulcer or fistula with great<br />

abscess or present secernation,<br />

often skin necrosis<br />

purulent secernation.<br />

b<br />

d<br />

Science, Practice and Education<br />

dement and soft­tissue reconstruction. When there were<br />

clinical signs of infection and ulcers which reached the<br />

fasciae and tendons with secernation, these demanded use<br />

of incision, necrectomy, detritus debridement and possible<br />

exploration. If there was no rapid calming of clinical<br />

signs of infection during the first week of the treatment,<br />

or if there was clinically obvious infection of a chronic<br />

nature, clinical exploration with sparing removing of infected<br />

part of the bone and soft­tissue reconstruction was<br />

done (fig.2). In cases of chronic forms of osteomyelitis<br />

after the resection of part of the bone or after the debridement,<br />

we applied perfusion drainage or local instillation<br />

of antibiotics (fig.1e, 2c). The antibiotics were given locally<br />

for not more than two weeks, followed by parenteral<br />

systemic antibiotic therapy for 2­6 weeks. Osteomyelitis<br />

with smaller ulcers can be healed in two weeks. When<br />

there is also a skin defect, it is often necessary to carry out<br />

the additional skin transplant. In diabetic foot, we can see<br />

a difference between chronic and acute infection and also<br />

a difference in intensity between the low­intensive infection<br />

and high­intensive infection (tempestuous reaction).<br />

Acute infection appears suddenly, after a minor injury<br />

or without a noticeable injury. Locally, only some signs<br />

of inflammation can be noticed, swelling, pain, colour,<br />

induration, with or without recurrence. Acute infection<br />

can be of low­intensity, when there is a clinical presence of<br />

local changes, but without noticeable significant systemic<br />

changes. Acute infection of high­intensity is followed by<br />

tempestuous local changes and systemic response (febricity,<br />

sepsis). Local changes are colour and swelling of entire<br />

foot, secernation or present abscess, and often also skin<br />

necrosis. It is possible that infection develops fast over several<br />

hours or days. Chronic infection of low­intensity looks<br />

like a typical ulcer with smaller secernation, but without<br />

the usual clinical signs of infection; it is long­lasting and<br />

can be treated non­operatively. Chronic infection of high<br />

intensity can turn over to the acute form and vice versa,<br />

just as the infection of low­intensity can have the characteristics<br />

of high­intensity infection and vice versa, too<br />

(table 1).<br />

Selecting patients for the study:<br />

The inclusion criteria were: diabetes mellitus type 1 and<br />

2; patient’s age­over 18, foot ulcers level III, IV and V;<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 9<br />


treatment which includes surgical procedures, positive<br />

smear of the wound.<br />

The exclusion criteria were: inflammatory changes with<br />

necrosis or foot gangrene, which were the indication for<br />

below­knee amputation. The diagnosis of bone infection<br />

was based on clinical findings, radiographic changes on<br />

bones and microbiological findings of bones and tissue<br />

from the operating room. The indication for surgical<br />

treatment was based on clinical findings, the duration of<br />

ulceration and failure of previous treatment, operative or<br />

non­operative.<br />

RESULTS<br />

In the study 23 patients were selected – 23 patients with<br />

ulcers, which were surgically treated. Of the patients, 19<br />

were male (82.6%) and four were female (17.4%). The<br />

average age was 55 years and the age range included patients<br />

aged 44­78. Ulcers were classified according to the<br />

Wagner classification as level III eight patients (34.5%),<br />

level IV eight patients (34.5%) and level V seven patients<br />

(30.4%). The clinical classification of the wounds showed<br />

there were 20 patients with chronic wounds (87%), 15<br />

with low­intensity infection (65.2%) and five with highintensity<br />

infection (21.7). There were three patients (13%)<br />

with acute wounds, one with low­intensity (4.4%) and two<br />

with high­intensity (8.7%). Surgical treatment included:<br />

surgical debridement 23, bone resections 11 (47.8%), disarticulation<br />

two (8.7%), perfusion two (8.7%), instillation<br />

of antibiotics three (13%), and suture or aproximation of<br />

wound’s border lines 14 (60.9%). Additional comorbidity,<br />

which may cause changes on foot or which may have<br />

influence on present changes on foot, was recorded in eight<br />

patients (34.8%), two with terminal renal insufficiency<br />

(8.7%), three with neuropathic changes Scharcot (13%)<br />

and one with pes excavatus (4.4%). Healing duration after<br />

the operation until the wound healing and the end of<br />

wound secretion was on average 7.5 weeks, (2­16 weeks).<br />

Wound healing and bone infection cleansing seem to have<br />

an improved outcome.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Surgical technique in diabetic foot has some characteristics,<br />

which should be considered. Generally, surgical interventions<br />

on foot should be done in the operating room,<br />

just as every other type of bone surgery. Incisions, smaller<br />

debridements and necrectomies could be done as smaller<br />

surgical procedures. During the surgical exploration, the<br />

soft tissue should not be divided and, generally, every manipulation<br />

should be very sparing, so the vascularisation<br />

can be saved. During the debridement, the incision should<br />

follow the demarcation line, avoiding bleeding as much as<br />

possible. When the wound is closing, no kind of tension is<br />

10<br />

a b<br />

c d<br />

Figure 3:<br />

3a. female, 54 years, osteomyelitis phalanges medialis<br />

et proximalis, dig.II ulceratio four months<br />

3b. Rtg, inter-phalangeal joint subluxation<br />

3c. operation: resection of proximal inter-phalangeal joint,<br />

debridemant, sutural, fixation with filli-K.<br />

3d. condition 4 weeks after the operation<br />

allowed. If there is no skin defect, the wound lines should<br />

be approximated. The flaps, which are formed, must have<br />

very wide basis. It is also important to consider whether<br />

wound drainage is necessary.<br />

Therapeutic approach in diabetic foot includes surgery,<br />

if there is a presence of ulcers and radiographic changes<br />

on bones (fig.1c, 2b, 3b). The chronic ulcers with changes<br />

on bones and joints can be persistent because of the bone<br />

infection or because of the pressure of the fragments, or<br />

both. These three situations need surgery as active therapy.<br />

Surgical treatment should include the resection of the part<br />

of the bone, which is infected or which protrudes out and<br />

presses the skin (fig.3). Surgical debridement and resection<br />

of part of the bone very often can enable the primary<br />

wound to close or make conditions better for surgical reconstruction<br />

of soft­tissues (fig.2).<br />

We based the diagnosis of bone infection on clinical<br />

findings, radiographic changes on bones and microbiological<br />

findings of bones and tissue from the operating room.<br />

We based the indication for surgical treatment on clinical<br />

findings, the duration of ulceration and failure of previous<br />

treatment, operative or non­operative. This study showed<br />

that the applied procedure shortens the healing, avoids<br />

complications, often results in a smaller scar, prevents the<br />

recurrence and often corrects the inadequate anatomical<br />

relation. This procedure also means more radical treat­<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2


ment, a larger procedure for the surgeon and also for the<br />

patient. Sometimes it is also necessary to repeat the surgical<br />

treatment. A large study reporting the surgical experience<br />

is needed to appraise the structured approach suggested in<br />

this study. Observations we have made in this series match<br />

the findings of other authors; after surgical treatment for<br />

osteomyelitis, low rate of recurrence was achieved 9 ; early<br />

and aggressive soft tissue reconstruction is in the patient’s<br />

best interest and is crucial for resolution of the chronic<br />

non­healing wound 10 . Diabetic foot infections are a major<br />

cause of morbidity. Infection is the common sequel<br />

of diabetic foot ulceration that leads to delayed wound<br />

healing 11 . We believe that bone biopsy remains the gold<br />

standard for the detection of osteomyelitis 12­15 . Realising<br />

that deep ulcers with detritus and secretion should<br />

be surgically treated, our opinion is that exploration and<br />

debridement should be done according to the clinical<br />

findings, even without the former confirmation of osteomyelitis<br />

diagnosis. It is best to take the bone tissue for<br />

histopathological and microbiological examination during<br />

the surgical treatment. This is important because there<br />

are recommendations which say that surgical percutaneous<br />

bone biopsy specimen after a 14­day antibiotic­free<br />

period represents the gold standard of care for diabetic foot<br />

osteomyelitis 14 . It is known that infection is the cause of<br />

great complications ­ major amputations are thought to<br />

be primarily due to arterial inflow and minor due to bone<br />

infection 1 . Radiology data revealed that 55% of the amputated<br />

limbs showed the presence of osteomyelitis compared<br />

with 38% of the limbs of non­amputees (p=0.39) 1 .<br />

Osteomyelitis may underlie a diabetic ulcer and is often<br />

treated by resection of the infected bone and always by<br />

antibiotics, the mode and length of treatment depending<br />

on the adequacy of the debridement 16 . Considering that<br />

the surgical treatment is a must when there is a serious<br />

infection, necrosis, and long­termed secretion, it should<br />

not be delayed. On the contrary, surgical treatment should<br />

be used to enable 1 – the more complete exploration, 2<br />

– debridement, 3 – taking the tissue samples for HP and<br />

microbiological examination, 4 – local antibiotic application<br />

and 5 – reconstruction of the soft tissue covering on<br />

foot. The findings of other authors can be the confirmation<br />

for this. Debridement is indicated when necrotic tissue<br />

is present. Topical antibiotics should be considered if<br />

there is no improvement in healing after 14 days. Systemic<br />

antibiotics are used in patients with advancing cellulitis,<br />

osteomyelitis, or systemic infection 17 . Ray resection technique<br />

is recommended for localized necrosis, infection,<br />

and osteomyelitis and is an accepted procedure allowing<br />

removal of the diseased toe and metatarsal and limits softtissue<br />

dissection. Defects from the toe amputation can<br />

be primarily closed, covered with a split­thickness skin<br />

graft, or closed in delayed primary fashion with the use of<br />

a mini­external fixation device 18 . The observed group of<br />

Science, Practice and Education<br />

patients with ulcers and bone infection, which was surgically<br />

treated, had shown a significantly shorter period of<br />

healing. Diabetic motor neuropathy is expressed as the loss<br />

of function and the contracting of the intrinsic muscles<br />

of the foot, leading to the classic claw toe deformity. The<br />

mean wound healing time was 25.6 +/­ 6.2 days resection<br />

arthroplasty for toe deformities with chronic infected<br />

ulcers in diabetic patients is a good alternative treatment<br />

to toe amputation 19 . Prolonged time of healing has been<br />

described in chronic wounds. That some parameters can<br />

also show 50% reduction in the wound area at four weeks<br />

after treatment is a reliable indicator of healing 1 .<br />

The application of the simple clinical evaluation of the<br />

presence of bone infection may also be of interest to other<br />

authors, as may the active surgical approach with tissue<br />

reconstruction after the sanation of the infection. Simple<br />

clinical evaluation and laboratory findings without using<br />

expensive imaging methods may be important indicators<br />

of osteomyelitis ­ 1 ESR > or =65 mm/h together with<br />

a wound size > or =2 cm and also a sensitivity of 83%,<br />

specificity of 77%, and positive predictive value of 80% 20 .<br />

Osteomyelitis affects up to 32% of full­thickness<br />

pressure ulcers. Seven steps in this structured approach<br />

of care include: 1. acknowledgment of osteomyelitis risk<br />

in patients with Stage IV pressure ulcers, 2. clinical evaluation<br />

for local or systemic signs of infection upon initial<br />

presentation, 3. radiographic evaluation, 4. surgical debridement<br />

to remove all nonviable tissue and/or scarred<br />

and infected bone, 5. obtaining pathology reports from<br />

sterile bone biopsy and deep microbial cultures, 6. targeted<br />

systemic antimicrobial therapy, and 7. tissue reconstruction<br />

following resolution of infection 21 . Experiences with<br />

local application of antibiotics ­ surgical debridement, implantation<br />

of gentamicin polymethylmethacrylate beads<br />

and long­term intravenous antibiotics ­ show the certain<br />

advantage of this kind of healing. In the instillation group<br />

the rate of recurrence of infection was just 10%, whereas<br />

it was 58.5% in the control group 22 .<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

The results of surgical treatment on diabetic foot, type<br />

Wagner III­V with bone infection, show significantly<br />

shorter duration. The applied surgical treatment includes:<br />

1. choosing the patients by clinical findings, laboratory<br />

parameters, inflammation and radiographies;<br />

2. surgical debridement with sparing resection of modified<br />

bone;<br />

3. local application of antibiotics at chronic infection<br />

and higher­intensity infection,<br />

4. intention for carrying out the approximation of<br />

wound border­lines and reconstruction of the softtissue<br />

defect;<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 11<br />


Science, Practice and Education<br />

5. local application of antibiotics no longer than two<br />

weeks and parentelal application no longer than six<br />

weeks,<br />

6. the use of general methods of healing the complications<br />

of diabetic foot; relief and metabolic balance.<br />

Surgical treatment includes exploration of the exposed<br />

bone and sparing resection. It is better to do the surgical<br />

treatment without delay and additional diagnostic procedures.<br />

Surgical treatment, with local and systemic antibiotic<br />

application achieves shorter and more successful<br />

healing. Earlier treatment of diabetic foot ulcers which<br />

have lasted for several months or even several years can<br />

be ended in few weeks. m<br />

Reference:<br />

1. Glinka MS, Margolis DJ, Tal A, Hoff tad O, Boulton AJM, Brem H. Preliminary<br />

development of a diabetic foot ulcer database from a wound electronic medical<br />

record: A tool to decrease limb amputations. Wound Repair Regen. 2009 Sep–Oct;<br />

17(5): 657–665. doi: 10.1111/j.15<strong>24</strong>-475X.2009.00527.x PMCID: PMC2835515<br />

2. Nouvong A, Hoogwerf B, Mohler E, Davis B, Tajaddini A, Medenilla E. Evaluation of<br />

Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing With Hyperspectral Imaging of Oxyhaemoglobin and<br />

Deoxyhaemoglobin Diabetes Care. 2009 November; 32(11): 2056–2061. doi:<br />

10.2337/dc08-2<strong>24</strong>6<br />

3. Hartemann-Heurtier A. Senneville E. Diabetic foot osteomyelitis. Diabetes &<br />

Metabolism 34 (2008) 87-95.<br />

4. Grayon ML, Gibbons GW, Balogh K, Levin E, Karchmer AW. Probing to bone in<br />

infected pedal ulcers. A clinical sign of underlying osteomyelitis in diabetic patients.<br />

JAMA 1995;273:721-3.<br />

5. Shone A, Burnside J, Chipchase S, Game F, Jeffcoate W. Probing the validity of the<br />

probe-to-bone test in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis of the foot in diabetes. Diabetes<br />

care (letter) 2006;29:945.<br />

6. Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Peters EJ, Lipsky BA, Probe-to-bone test for diagnosing<br />

diabetic foot osteomyelitis: reliable or relic? Diabetes care 2007;30:270-4.<br />

As a member of <strong>EWMA</strong>, you need access to the<br />

latest international developments in wound<br />

management and prevention.<br />

Journal of Wound Care is a leading international<br />

MEDLINE-listed wound care journal, with a loyal<br />

global audience and contributors from every<br />

continent. Every month, JWC provides a truly<br />

global perspective on wound care, from the latest<br />

in evidence-based practice to cutting-edge research<br />

from the US, Europe and elsewhere.<br />

JWC is read by a wide audience, including doctors,<br />

nurses, podiatrists, physiotherapists and occupational<br />

therapists involved in wound care.<br />

SUBSCRIBE TODAY<br />

and receive special rates online by visiting<br />

www.journalofwoundcare.com/<strong>EWMA</strong><br />

7. Jeff G. van Baal. Surgical treatment of the infected diabetic foot. CID 2004;39<br />

S123-9<br />

8. Robinson AHN, Paspula C. Brodsky JW. Surgical aspects of the diabetic foot. JBJS Br<br />

2009;91-B 1-8.<br />

9. Sánchez JA, Martínez JLL, Herrero CH, Vilorio NC, Marrero YQ, Morales EG,<br />

Herrero MJH. Does osteomyelitis in the feet of patients with diabetes really recur<br />

after surgical treatment? Natural history of a surgical series. Diabet Med. 2011 Dec<br />

8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03528.x.<br />

10. Capobianco CM, Stapleton JJ, Zgonis T. Soft tissue reconstruction pyramid in the<br />

diabetic foot. Foot Ankle Spec. 2010 Oct;3(5):<strong>24</strong>1-8. Epub 2010 Jul 7.<br />

11. Nagoba BS, Gandhi RC, Wadher BJ, Rao A, Hartalkar AR, Selkar SP. A simple and<br />

effective approach for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers with different Wagner<br />

grades. Int Wound J. 2010 Jun;7(3):153-8. Epub 2010 Apr 23.<br />

12. Miller AO, Henry M. Update in diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections.<br />

Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2009 Nov;20(4):611-25.<br />

13. Lipsky AB.Medical treatment of diabetic foot infections.CID 2004;39:S 104-14.<br />

14. Lesens O, Desbiez F, Vidal M, Robin F, Descamps S, Beytout J, Laurichesse H,<br />

Tauveron I. Culture of per-wound bone specimens: a simplified approach for the<br />

medical management of diabetic foot osteomyelitis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011<br />

Feb;17(2):285-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03194.x.<br />

15. Iori I, Pizzini AM, Arioli D, Favali D, Leone MC. Infected pressure ulcers: evaluation<br />

and management. Infez Med. 2009 Sep;17 Suppl 4:88-94.<br />

16. Vuorisalo S, Venermo M, Lepäntalo M.Treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. J Cardiovasc<br />

Surg (Torino). 2009 Jun;50(3):275-91.<br />

17. Bluestein D, Javaheri A. Pressure ulcers: prevention, evaluation, and management.<br />

Am Fam Physician. 2008 Nov 15;78(10):1186-94. Minimum-incision ray resection.<br />

Oznur A, Roukis TS. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2008 Oct;25(4):609-22.<br />

18. Oznur A, Roukis TS. Minimum-incision ray resection. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2008<br />

Oct;25(4):609-22.<br />

19. Kim JY, Kim TW, Park YE, Lee YJ. Modified resection arthroplasty for infected<br />

non-healing ulcers with toe deformity in diabetic patients. Foot Ankle Int. 2008<br />

<strong>May</strong>;29(5):493-7.<br />

20. Ertugrul BM, Savk O, Ozturk B, Cobanoglu M, Oncu S, Sakarya S. The diagnosis of<br />

diabetic foot osteomyelitis: examination findings and laboratory values. Med Sci<br />

Monit. 2009 Jun;15(6):CR307-12.<br />

21. Rennert R, Golinko M, Yan A, Flattau A, Tomic-Canic M, Brem H. Developing and<br />

evaluating outcomes of an evidence-based protocol for the treatment of osteomyelitis<br />

in Stage IV pressure ulcers: a literature and wound electronic medical record<br />

database review. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2009 Mar;55(3):42-5.<br />

22. Timmers MS, Graafland N, Bernards AT, Nelissen RG, van Dissel JT, Jukema GN.<br />

Negative pressure wound treatment with polyvinyl alcohol foam and polyhexanide<br />

antiseptic solution instillation in posttraumatic osteomyelitis. Wound Repair Regen.<br />

2009 Mar-Apr;17(2):278-86.<br />

j o u rnal of w o u nd ca r e W C<br />

v o l u m e 2 0 . n u m b e r 1 1 . n o v e m b e r 2 0 1 1<br />

?<br />

?<br />

?<br />

j o u rnal r rnal<br />

l of f w o u nd d ca r e W C<br />

v o l u m e 2 0 . n u m b e r 1 0 . o c t o b e r 2 0 1 1<br />

?<br />

?<br />

?<br />

j o u rnal of w o u nd ca r e W C<br />

?<br />

?<br />

?<br />

C<br />

C<br />

The patient experience of complex wounds<br />

treated with NPWT<br />

Ultrasound assessment of necrotic tissue in pressure ulcers with undermining<br />

Chronic plantar ulcer secondary to congenital indifference to pain<br />

Manuka honey as an effective treatment for chronic pilonidal sinus wounds<br />

Silver and nanoparticles of silver in wound dressings<br />

Efficacy of a PHMB-containing biocellulose dressing in the treatment of biofilms<br />

C<br />

Quantitative estimation of exudate volume<br />

for full-thickness pressure ulcers<br />

v o l u m e 2 0 . n u m b e r 9 . s e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 1<br />

A proposed method of evaluating orbital exenteration wounds<br />

Modelling the cost-effectiveness of bioelectric stimulation therapy in chronic VLUs<br />

The effect of temperature and Evaluation humidity on the permeability of the of skin film dressings stripping of wound<br />

Complex lower extremity wounds treated with skin grafts and NPWT dressing adhesives<br />

The effect of simulated leg-length discrepancy on plantar pressure distribution<br />

Wound healing through synergy of hyaluronan and an iodine complex<br />

Innovation in tissue viability documentation for acute services<br />

Necrosis in breast cancer patients with skin metastases receiving bevacizumab<br />

JWC_20_11_cover.indd 1 03/11/2011 14:44<br />

VISIT NOW:<br />

www.journalofwoundcare.com/<strong>EWMA</strong><br />

JWC_20_10_cover.indd 1 04/10/2011 15:22


SYS/GLO/862/0412<br />

A chronic wound with EPA has a<br />

90% probability it won’t heal 1<br />

28% of non healing wounds have EPA 1<br />

There are no visual cues to detect EPA 2,3<br />

UNTIL NOW<br />

NOW YOU CAN DETECT EPA IN 15 MINUTES<br />

Come and see us at <strong>EWMA</strong> stand 35.<br />

Also, don’t miss out on our Symposium - Testing for EPA,<br />

The arrival of wound diagnostics - Thursday <strong>24</strong>th <strong>May</strong>, 16.00-17.00 Room E1.<br />

For more information, contact us on EPA@systagenix.com or visit our website<br />

www.systagenix.com<br />

References<br />

1. Serena T. et al. Protease activity levels associated with healing status of chronic wounds. Poster, Wounds UK 2011.<br />

2. Snyder R. et al. A survey: The importance of proteases in wound healing and wound assessment. Poster, Wounds UK 2011.<br />

3. International consensus. The role of proteases in wound diagnostics. An expert working group review. London: Wounds International, 2011.


Askina ® Calgitrol ® Paste<br />

A soft paste wound dressing containing 100% ionic silver:<br />

More intimate contact between the wound and active antimicrobial silver ions,<br />

particularly valuable in difficult to manage wounds.<br />

NEW<br />

■ Easy to apply on deep wounds and sinuses<br />

■ No activation needed<br />

■ Sustained controlled delivery of silver ions<br />

■ Antimicrobial efficacy against a broad spectrum of microorganisms, including MRSA<br />

■ Safe for use<br />

■ Non staining<br />

B. Braun Hospicare Ltd. | Collooney | Co. Sligo | Ireland<br />

www.bbraun.com | www.woundcare-bbraun.com


Presented at<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> 2011<br />

Brussels · Belgium<br />

Endothelial progenitor cells, a unipotent<br />

stem cell, involved in neovascularization<br />

of wound healing in diabetic foot ulcer<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Foot ulceration associated with diabetic complications<br />

is prevalent in patients with diabetes worldwide,<br />

leading to limb amputation. Reduction of<br />

peripheral blood flow and decrease in local neovascularization<br />

are critical factors contributing to<br />

slow healing or non­healing wounds among these<br />

patients. Presumably, mature endothelial cells are<br />

regarded as the sole candidate for participation in<br />

angiogenesis in wound healing. In recent decades,<br />

endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) have been recognized<br />

and are being investigated as the main<br />

cellular effectors responsible for postnatal neovascularization<br />

and playing a vital role in wound<br />

healing. In this review, the role of EPCs involved<br />

in the neovascularization in wound healing will be<br />

evaluated. The process of EPCs from bone marrow<br />

to blood circulation requires a complex and<br />

sequential event including mobilization, homing,<br />

adhesion, transendothelial migration, differentiation<br />

and finally incorporation to newly formed<br />

blood vessels. However, deficiency of circulating<br />

EPCs and functional defects of EPCs have been<br />

reported in diabetes, which adversely affect interfering<br />

neovascularization of wound healing. Cellbased<br />

therapy using EPCs would be a promising<br />

therapeutic strategy for treating diabetic patients<br />

with non­healing wound. Besides, the establishment<br />

of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) in<br />

treating diabetic foot ulcer may develop new perspectives<br />

of EPCs’ involvement in diabetic wound<br />

healing.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

According to the data provided by World Health<br />

Organization, about 346 million people worldwide<br />

have diabetes mellitus. The prevalence of<br />

diabetes has been increasing and represents a major<br />

health burden for the 21 st century. Diabetes<br />

mellitus is associated with various complications<br />

including cardiovascular disease, neuropathy,<br />

retinopathy, nephropathy and impaired wound<br />

healing in lower extremities. Annually about 1%<br />

to 4% of those with diabetes eventually develop a<br />

foot ulcer and the annual incidence of amputation<br />

is 0.21­1.37% [1] .<br />

The pathophysiology of diabetic foot ulcer and<br />

impaired wound healing has been well described.<br />

The factors of delayed wound healing are contributed<br />

to by progressive loss of sensory, motor<br />

and autonomic nervous system in diabetic patients<br />

leading to the loss of protective mechanisms<br />

upon injury in lower extremities. Development of<br />

peripheral vascular disease reduces the blood circulation<br />

to the dermal area, thus minimizing the<br />

supply of nutrients for normal wound repair [2] .<br />

Wound healing is a well­orchestrated, integrated<br />

and complex process that involves hemostasis,<br />

inflammation, angiogenesis and tissue<br />

granulation [3] . The coordination of multiple cells<br />

including platelet, monocytes, macrophages, lymphocytes,<br />

endothelial cells, fibroblasts and keratinocytes<br />

is essential for normal wound healing.<br />

However, the abnormal wound healing in diabetes<br />

is characterized by diminished level of growth<br />

factors, cytokines and chemokines; elevated inflammatory<br />

response with enhanced proliferation<br />

of inflammatory cells; inhibition in angiogenesis<br />

with decreased proliferation, migration and tube<br />

format<br />

Restoring the blood flow to the wound site<br />

is the prerequisite for successful wound healing.<br />

It is generally believed that neovascularization is<br />

solely aroused by the formation of new blood vessels<br />

from pre­existing blood vessels (angiogenesis).<br />

Over the past decades, the emergence of EPCs has<br />

provided a new perspective in the involvement of<br />

postnatal vasculogenesis in neovascularization. In<br />

1997, Asahara et al. first isolated and identified<br />

circulating EPCs from human peripheral blood<br />

for postnatal neovascularization which is defined<br />

as the de novo formation of blood vessels with the<br />

recruitment and incorporation of EPCs. The findings<br />

showed that EPCs differentiated into mature<br />

endothelial cells in vitro and incorporated actively<br />

�<br />

Science, Practice and Education<br />

Jacqueline<br />

Chor Wing Tam 1,2<br />

Chun Hay Ko 1,2<br />

Ping Chung Leung 1,2<br />

Kwok Pui Fung 1,2,3<br />

Clara Bik San Lau 1,2,3<br />

1 Institute of Chinese<br />

Medicine,<br />

The Chinese University of<br />

Hong Kong, Shatin, New<br />

Territories, Hong Kong<br />

2 State Key Laboratory of<br />

Phytochemistry and Plant<br />

Resources in West China,<br />

The Chinese University of<br />

Hong Kong, Shatin,<br />

New Territories,<br />

Hong Kong<br />

3 School of Biomedical<br />

Sciences,<br />

The Chinese University of<br />

Hong Kong, Shatin,<br />

New Territories,<br />

Hong Kong<br />

Correspondence:<br />

claralau@cuhk.edu.hk<br />

Winner of the<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> 2011 First Time<br />

Presenters prize at<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> 2011<br />

conference in Bruxelles.<br />

Conflict of interest: none<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 15


1st International Course on<br />

The Neuropathic<br />

Osteoarthropathic Foot<br />

(Charcot)<br />

Advanced Postgraduate Course,<br />

Rheine, Germany<br />

15-17 November, <strong>2012</strong><br />

The international course will be based on the<br />

expertise gathered from 10 consecutive years of<br />

providing national courses on the Diabetic Foot.<br />

The main focus are practical sessions in small<br />

groups to train the diagnostic and treatment skills<br />

necessary for the interdisciplinary treatment of<br />

Charcot patients.<br />

The course will be held at the Mathias-Spital in<br />

Rheine.<br />

The courses are open to anyone involved in<br />

the treatment or management of Neuropathic<br />

Osteoarthropathic Foot patients.<br />

Number of participants: 25-50<br />

Language: English<br />

www.charcotfootcourses.org<br />

into sites of angiogenesis in ischemic animal models [5] .<br />

After that, a growing body has proposed that bone marrow<br />

(BM)­derived EPCs can functionally participate in<br />

neovascularization in wound healing and limb ischemia [6,<br />

7] . It has been estimated that EPCs contribute up to 25%<br />

of endothelial cells of newly formed vessels in animal models<br />

[8] . Substantial evidence has demonstrated the role of<br />

BM­derived EPCs in neovascularization [9,10,11] . In general,<br />

it is now well accepted that recruitment of EPCs in BM<br />

and the mature endothelial cells in pre­existing blood vessels<br />

are essential in tissue vascularization in wound healing.<br />

ORIGIN OF EPCS<br />

EPCs are adult hemangioblast­derived cells in BM. Immature<br />

stem cells originally exist in a quiescent state associated<br />

with BM stromal cells. Under specific stimulation<br />

and activation, stem cells will differentiate into EPCs<br />

preceding the mobilization of EPCs in peripheral blood<br />

for neovascularization. During their development, EPCs<br />

gradually lose stem cell characteristics and progressively<br />

gain mature endothelial cells characteristics.<br />

EPCS ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION<br />

Numerous methods have been adopted for the isolation<br />

of EPCs [12,13,14] . EPCs are often characterized by the<br />

combination of different cell surface markers, including<br />

CD34, CD133, CD146, platelet endothelial cell adhesion<br />

molecule­1 (PECAM­1), vascular endothelial cadherin<br />

(VE­cadherin), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor<br />

2 (VEGFR2) and von Willebrand factor (vWF) [15,16] .<br />

However, there is no defined set of markers which can<br />

identify EPCs population uniquely. The reasons may be<br />

attributed to the various origins of EPCs precursors during<br />

extraction and isolation. The multiple precursors include<br />

haematopoietic stem cells, myeloid cells, multipotent BM<br />

progenitors or tissue resident stem cells. Moreover, EPCs<br />

may exist in different differentiation stage in the lineage<br />

References<br />

1. Bartus C.L., Margolis D.J. Reducing the incidence of foot ulceration and amputation<br />

in diabetes. Curr Diabetes Rep 2004: 4: 413-418.<br />

2. Bowering C.K. Diabetic foot ulcers: pathophysiology, assessment, and therapy. Can<br />

Fam Physician 2001: 47: 1007-1016.<br />

3. Diegelmann R.F., Evans M.C. Wound healing: an overview of acute, fibrotic and<br />

delayed wound healing. Front Biosci 2004: 9: 283-289.<br />

4. Brem H., Tomic-Canic M. Cellular and molecular basis of wound healing in<br />

diabetes. J Clin Invest 2007: 117: 1219-1222.<br />

5. Asahara T., Murohara T., Sullivan A., Silver M., Van Der Zee R., Li T., Witzenbichler<br />

B., Schatteman G., Isner J.M. Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for<br />

angiogenesis. Science 1997: 275: 964-967.<br />

6. Asahara T., Masuda H., Takahashi T., Kalka C., Pastore C., Silver M, Kearne M.,<br />

Magner M., Isner J.M. Bone marrow origin of endothelial progenitor cells responsible<br />

for postnatal vasculogenesis in physiological and pathological neovascularization.<br />

Circ Res 1999: 85: 221-228.<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2


of EPCs development. It is likely that various markers<br />

are present at EPCs at different points during their differentiation<br />

cascade from immature progenitors to mature<br />

endothelial cells. In line with this point of view, it<br />

has been suggested that EPCs can be divided into two<br />

distinct cell populations, which appear in cell culture sequentially.<br />

They are named early EPCs and late outgrowth<br />

EPCs (LOG EPCs). The technique to separate these two<br />

cell populations is according to their adherence ability<br />

in culture. Many studies demonstrated that only cells<br />

that adhere early in culture (within 48 hours) are early<br />

EPCs while cells adhering in the culture plate later than<br />

48 hours are believed to be LOG EPCs [17] . The two cell<br />

populations are shown to have morphological difference<br />

in cell culture. Early EPCs have rounded or spindle­like<br />

morphology with random dispersion on the culture plate<br />

whereas LOG EPCs appear as cobblestone­like clusters<br />

with elongated cells at the periphery and form colonies<br />

in culture [18] . Apart from their difference in morphology,<br />

it is interesting to note that the two cell populations<br />

have been shown to have different roles in neovascularization<br />

and vascular repair. Early EPCs mainly produce<br />

angiogenic growth factors, which support the proliferation<br />

and promote the functioning of LOG EPCs and mature<br />

tissue­resident endothelial cells for neovascularization.<br />

LOG EPCs demonstrate high proliferative activity and<br />

are directly incorporated into the endothelium of newly<br />

formed blood vessels [19] . Thus, LOG EPCs are considered<br />

to be the true endothelial progenitor candidates in<br />

vascular developmental biology while early EPCs are proangiogenic<br />

cell population, which support the local neovascularization<br />

indirectly.<br />

THE INVOLVEMENT OF EPCS IN<br />

NEOVASCULARIZATION OF WOUND HEALING<br />

The recruitment and incorporation of EPCs in the formation<br />

of new micro­vessels in wounds requires coordinated<br />

and multi­disciplined steps. It involves sensing the<br />

7. Takahashi T., Kalka C., Masuda H., Chen D., Silver M., Kearney M., Magner M.,<br />

Isner J.M., Asahara T. Ischemia- and cytokine-induced mobilization of bone<br />

marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells for neovascularization. Nat Med 1999:<br />

5: 434-438.<br />

8. Tepper O.M., Galiano R.D., Capla J.M., Kalka C., Gagne P.J., Jacobowitz G.R.,<br />

Levine J.P., Gurtner G.C. Human endothelial progenitor cells from type II diabetics<br />

exhibit impaired proliferation, adhesion, and incorporation into vascular structures.<br />

Circulation 2002: 106: 2781-2786.<br />

9. Kalka C., Masuda H., Takahashi T., Kalka-Moll W.M., Silver M., Kearney M., Li T.,<br />

Isner J.M., Asahara T. Transplantation of ex vivo expanded endothelial progenitor<br />

cells for therapeutic neovascularization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000: 97:<br />

3422-3427.<br />

10. Majka S.M., Jackson K.A., Kienstra K.A., Majesky M.W., Goodbell M.A., Hirschi<br />

K.K. Distinct progenitor populations in skeletal muscle are bone marrow derived and<br />

exhibit different cell fates during vascular regeneration. J Clin Invest 2003: 111:<br />

71-79.<br />

11. Kopp H.G., Ramos C.A., Rafii S. Contribution of endothelial progenitors and<br />

proangiogenic hematopoietic cells to vascularization of tumor and ischemic tissue.<br />

Curr Opin Hematol 2006: 13: 175-181.<br />

Science, Practice and Education<br />

ischemia signal from distanced tissues, migration of EPCs<br />

from BM to circulation, homing in of circulating EPCs to<br />

the target sites, the integration of EPCs into blood vessels<br />

and the in situ differentiation of EPCs into mature and<br />

functional endothelial cells [20] .<br />

Bone marrow is a major reservoir of adult progenitor<br />

cells which exist in a quiescent state. In the course<br />

of tissue damage or tissue hypoxia, the quantity of circulating<br />

EPCs is greatly increased by the mobilization<br />

of EPCs. The EPCs mobilization can be switched on by<br />

up­regulation of endogenous factors in blood including<br />

vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [21] and fibroblast<br />

growth factor­2 [22] . These stimulating factors activate<br />

matrix metalloproteinase­9, resulting in the translocation<br />

of EPCs to a permissive zone ready for mobilization into<br />

blood circulation [23] .<br />

A quantity of evidence strongly supported the EPCs<br />

recruitment and homing to target sites via the stromal<br />

cell derived factor­1a (SDF­1a)/chemokine receptor type<br />

4 (CXCR4) axis [<strong>24</strong>] . SDF­1a expression is up­regulated<br />

under hypoxic conditions and it binds exclusively to<br />

CXCR4. Accordingly, experimental studies demonstrated<br />

that blockage of either SDF­1a or CXCR4 significantly<br />

reduced the adhesion of EPCs to mature endothelial cells<br />

monolayer in vitro [25] and the in vivo homing of circulating<br />

EPCs to ischemic limb in hindlimb ischemic model [26] .<br />

Integration of circulating EPCs to blood vessels involves<br />

the participation of integrins. It has been proposed<br />

that adhesion of EPCs is similar to the adhesion mechanisms<br />

of leukocyte on endothelium [27] . One of the integrins,<br />

leukocyte b2­integrins, has been demonstrated<br />

to be involved in EPCs adhesion mechanisms. In vitro<br />

adhesion assay revealed that b2­integrins mediated the<br />

adhesion of peripheral blood derived EPCs to endothelial<br />

cell monolayers [28] . Moreover, a growing body showed the<br />

essential role of b2­integrins in EPCs homing to ischemic<br />

tissues and for the neovascularization capacity in vivo [29] .<br />

After that, subsequent step of transendothelial migration<br />

12. Hill J.M., Zalos G., Halcox J.P., Schenke W.H., Waclawiw M.A., Quyyumi A.A.,<br />

Finkel T. Circulating endothelial progenitor cells, vascular function and cardiovascular<br />

risk. N Engl J Med 2003: 348: 593-600.<br />

13. Thomas R.A., Pietrzak D.C., Scicchitano M.S., Thomas H.C., McFarland D.C.,<br />

Frazier K.S. Detection and characterization of circulating endothelial progenitor cells<br />

in normal rat blood. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 2009: 60(3): 263-274.<br />

14. Sekiguchi H., Li M., Jujo K., Yokoyama A., Hagiwara N., Asahara T. Improved<br />

culture-based isolation of differentiating endothelial progenitor cells from mouse<br />

bone marrow mononuclear cells. Plos one 2011: 6(12): e28639.<br />

15. Hristov M., Schmitz S., Schuhmann C., Leyendecker T., Von Hundelshausen P.,<br />

Krotz F., Sohn H.Y., Nauwelaers F.A., Weber C. An optimized flow cytometry<br />

protocol for analysis of angiogenic monocytes and endothelial progenitor cells in<br />

peripheral blood. ISAC 2009: 75A: 848-853.<br />

16. Mazzolai L., Bouzourene K., Hayoz D., Dignat-George F., Liu J.W., Bounameaux H.,<br />

Dunoyer-Geindre S., Kruithof. E.K.O. Characterization of human late outgrowth<br />

endothelial progenitor-derived cells under various flow conditions. J Vasc Res 2011:<br />

48: 443-451.<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 17<br />


10th Scientific Meeting of the<br />

Diabetic Foot<br />

Study Group<br />

of the EASD<br />

28-30 September <strong>2012</strong><br />

Berlin­Potsdam, Germany<br />

Conference theme<br />

Advancement<br />

of knowledge<br />

on all aspects of<br />

diabetic foot care<br />

Main subjects during conference:<br />

� Epidemiology<br />

� Basic and clinical science<br />

� Diagnostics<br />

� Classification<br />

� Foot clinics<br />

� Biomechanics, Osteoarthropathy<br />

� Orthopaedic surgery<br />

� Infection<br />

� Revascularisation<br />

� Uraemia<br />

� Wound healing/outcome<br />

www.dfsg.org<br />

is vital for migration of EPCs from blood vessels to active<br />

site of neovascularization in wound area. However, less is<br />

known about the transendothelial migration of EPCs. Several<br />

in vitro studies provided the relation of high expression<br />

of CD99 or PECAM in EPCs, which could facilitate the<br />

migration of EPCs through endothelial monolayer [30,31] .<br />

Although the role of EPCs in the involvement of neovascularization<br />

in wound healing is extensively investigated,<br />

the genetic cascades regulating the maturation to<br />

functional endothelial cells in the adult system are largely<br />

unknown. During embryonic development, vascular endothelial<br />

growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor play a crucial<br />

role in stimulating hemangioblast differentiation into<br />

endothelial lineage [32] . VEGF can strongly up­regulate the<br />

expression of endothelial cell markers on progenitor cells<br />

and thus increase the number of cell population capable<br />

of repairing the endothelial monolayer and improving<br />

vascular function. Besides, VEGF also initiates ex vivo<br />

endothelial differentiation of various adult progenitor<br />

precursor population [33] .<br />

EPCS ALTERATIONS IN DIABETES<br />

Incomplete and prolonged wound healing is caused by<br />

compromised neovascularization, reduced cell recruitment<br />

and defects in collagen matrix formation. Wound healing<br />

requires the combined effort of inflammatory and noninflammatory<br />

cells. EPCs are involved in a large proportion<br />

of the non­inflammatory cells that migrate to the skin<br />

for normal repair. Within the spectrum of diabetes, substantial<br />

in vitro studies demonstrated a significant EPCs<br />

reduction and dysfunction in type 1 and type 2 diabetes.<br />

Fadini et al. confirmed for the first time that type 2 diabetes<br />

was associated with severe depletion of circulating<br />

CD34 + /VEGFR2 + EPCs, with the lowest level of circulating<br />

EPCs in ischemic foot lesions [34] . Tepper et al. found<br />

that EPCs isolated from type 2 diabetic patients exhibited<br />

decreased proliferation and adherence to endothelial cells.<br />

They were less likely to participate in tubule formation,<br />

17. Sieveking D.P., Buckle A., Celermajer D.S., Ng M.K.C. Strikingly different angiogenic<br />

properties of endothelial progenitor cell subpopulations. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008: 51:<br />

660-668.<br />

18. Yoder M.C., Mead L.E., Prater D., Krier T.R., Mroueh K.N., Li F., Krasich R., Temm<br />

C.J., Prchal J.T., Ingram D.A. Redefining endothelial progenitor cells via clonal<br />

analysis and hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell principals. Blood 2007: 109:<br />

1801-1809.<br />

19. Shantsila E., Watson T., Tse H.F., Lip G.Y.H. New insights on endothelial progenitor<br />

cell subpopulations and their angiogenic properties. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008: 51:<br />

669-671.<br />

20. Hristov M., Weber C. Progenitor cell trafficking in the vascular wall. J Thromb<br />

Haemost 2009: 7(Suppl. 1): 31-34.<br />

21. Kalka C., Masuda H., Takahashi T., Gordon R., Tepper O., Gravereaux E., Pieczek<br />

A., Iwaguro H., Hayashi S.I., Isner J.M., Asahara T. Vascular endothelial growth<br />

factor165 gene transfer augments circulating endothelial progenitor cells in human<br />

subjects. Circ Res 2000: 86: 1198-1202.<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2


suggesting that hyperglycemia destructed EPC biology [35] .<br />

Loomans et al. obtained nearly identical results in type 1<br />

diabetic patients [36] . Moreover, many phenotypes of EPCs<br />

appeared to be altered in diabetes. Egan et al. revealed a<br />

significant decreased expression of the surface antigen in<br />

EPCs by flow cytometry including CD31, CD34, CD133,<br />

VEGFR2, VE­cadherin, vWF and CXCR4 [37] . However,<br />

these established observations have no detailed mechanistic<br />

explanation of the EPCs defects in diabetes. Circulating<br />

EPCs reduction in diabetes can theoretically account for<br />

decreased survival; change in the mobilization mechanism<br />

from BM; altered extravascular homing and deranged differentiation.<br />

There is evidence that EPCs from diabetic patients<br />

displayed a reduced survival followed by an increased<br />

rate of apoptotic cell death. Abundant in vivo animal studies<br />

provided the evidence that diabetes led to an inability<br />

of EPCs to mobilize from BM to peripheral circulation<br />

under ischemia conditions [38] . In support of the hypothesis<br />

of EPCs deranged differentiation, one study observed that<br />

peripheral blood mononuclear cells were more prone to<br />

differentiate into pro­inflammatory phenotype than into<br />

EPCs phenotype in high glucose level [39] . Taking all these<br />

findings together, diabetes seems to alter EPC biology,<br />

thus inhibiting EPCs recruitment and incorporation to<br />

the active site of vasculogenesis in diabetic wound healing.<br />

PROMISING CELL-BASED THERAPy IN<br />

DIABETIC WOUND HEALING<br />

Among the various type of stem or progenitor cells, EPCs<br />

are one of the representatives that have been moved from<br />

experimental models to clinical trials. EPCs have been<br />

tested in patients with acute and chronic ischemic heart<br />

disease, and the outcomes were very promising. Assmus<br />

et al. allocated patients with acute myocardial infarction<br />

(AMI) to receive intracoronary infusion of either<br />

BM­derived or PB­derived progenitor cells. The results<br />

demonstrated the patients with AMI had regeneration<br />

enhancement in global left ventricular ejection fraction<br />

22. Fontaine V., Filipe C., Werner N., Gourdy P., Billon A., Garmy-Susini B., Brouchet L.,<br />

Bayard F., Prats H., Doetschman T., Nickenig G., Arnal J.F. Essential role of bone<br />

marrow fibroblast growth factor-2 in the effect of estradiol on reendothelialization<br />

and endothelial progenitor cell mobilization. Am J Pathol 2006: 169: 1855-1862.<br />

23. Rafii S., Lyden D. Therapeutic stem and progenitor cell transplantation for organ<br />

vascularization and regeneration. Nat Med 2003: 9: 702-712.<br />

<strong>24</strong>. Ceradini D.J., Gurtner G.C. Homing to hypoxia: HIF-1 as a mediator of progenitor<br />

cell recruitment to injured tissue. Trends Cardiovasc Med 2005: 15: 57-63.<br />

25. Ceradini D.J., Kulkarni A.R., Callaghan M.J., Tepper O.M., Bastidas N., Kleinman<br />

M.E., Capla J.M., Galiano R.D., Levine J.P., Gurtner G.C. Progenitor cell trafficking<br />

is regulated by hypoxic gradients through HIF-1 induction of SDF-1. Nat Med 2004:<br />

10: 858–864.<br />

26. Walter D.H., Haendeler J., Reinhold J., Rochwalsky U., Seeger F., Honold J.,<br />

Hoffmann J., Urbich C., Lehmann R., Arenzana-Seisdesdos F., Aicher A., Heeschen<br />

C., Fichtlscherer S., Zeiher A.M., Dimmeler S. Impaired CXCR4 signaling contributes<br />

to the reduced neovascularization capacity of endothelial progenitor cells from<br />

patients with coronary artery disease. Circ Res 2005: 97: 1142–1151.<br />

27. Urbich C., Chavakis E., Dimmeler S. Homing and differentiation of endothelial<br />

progenitor cells. In D. Marme & N. Fusenig (Eds.). New York: Springer: Tumor<br />

angiogenesis; 2008. p. 309-3<strong>24</strong>.<br />

Science, Practice and Education<br />

from 51.6+9.6% to 60.1+8.6% (p=0.003) and regional<br />

wall motion in the infarct zone from ­1.5+0.2 SD/chord<br />

to ­0.5+0.7SD/chord (p


Science, Practice and Education<br />

have been conducted using traditional Chinese medicine<br />

(TCM) in improving diabetic wound healing in Prince of<br />

Wales Hospital (Hong Kong) and the Chinese University<br />

of Hong Kong respectively. In 2001, Wong et al. first demonstrated<br />

TCM in combination with simple debridement<br />

as an alternative treatment of diabetic foot ulcer. Two<br />

herbal drinks were orally taken by the patients. The first<br />

herbal preparation consisted of Radix Astragali, Rhizoma<br />

atractylodis marcocephala, Radix stephaniae tetrandrae,<br />

Radix polygoni multiflori, Radix rehmanniae and Radix<br />

smilax china which was aimed at muscle strengthening and<br />

swelling control. Another herbal preparation contained<br />

Radix rehmanniae, Fructus corni, Rhizoma dioscoreae,<br />

Cortex moutan, Rhizoma alismatis, Rhizoma smilacis glabrae,<br />

Radix astragli and Fructus schisandrae which promoted<br />

regeneration. The results showed that about 85%<br />

of diabetic patients avoided limb amputation. The consumption<br />

of herbal preparations in patients appeared to<br />

offer improvement in the local circulation as exemplified<br />

by improved warmth and color of the toes. In addition,<br />

granulation tissue formation at the ulcer bed was observed<br />

as a sign of improvement [42,43] . In our previous clinical<br />

study, the herbal extracts exhibited significant wound<br />

healing effect in diabetic patients. In order to simply and<br />

modify the TCM formula, individual herbs were tested<br />

for the fibroblast viability in CRL­7522 fibroblast cell line<br />

and primary fibroblasts from a diabetic foot ulcer patient.<br />

The results supported the previously reported clinical efficacies<br />

of the two herbal preparations and indicated the<br />

individual herb with compromised primary fibroblast viability<br />

effect [44] . With the results of our expertise, Tam<br />

et al. presented the first scientific evidence towards the<br />

efficacy of a Chinese herbal formula (NF3) with Radix<br />

33. Dimmeler S., Aicher A., Vasa M., Mildner-Rihm C., Adler K., Tiemann M., Rutten<br />

H., Fichtlscherer S., Martin H., Zeiher A.M. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins)<br />

increase endothelial progenitor cells via the PI 3-kinase/Akt pathway. J Clin Invest<br />

2001: 108: 391–397.<br />

34. Fadini G.P., Miorin M., Facco M., Bonamico S., Baesso I., Grego F., Menegolo M.,<br />

Vigili de Kreutzenberg S., Tiengo A., Agostini C., Avogaro A. Circulating endothelial<br />

progenitor cells are reduced in peripheral vascular complications of type 2 diabetes<br />

mellitus. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005: 45: 1449-1457.<br />

35. Tepper O.M., Galiano R.D., Capla J.M., Kalka C., Gagne P.J., Jacobowitz G.R.,<br />

Levine J.P., Gurtner G.C. Human endothelial progenitor cells from type II diabetics<br />

exhibit impaired proliferation, adhesion, and incorporation into vascular structures.<br />

Circulation 2002: 106: 2781-2786.<br />

36. Loomans C.J.M., De Koning E.J.P., Staal F.J.T., Rookmaaker M.B., Verseyden C.,<br />

De Boer H.C., Verhaar M.C., Braam B., Rabelink T.J., Van Zonneveld A.J. Endothelial<br />

progenitor cell dysfunction: a novel concept in the pathogenesis of vascular<br />

complications of type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 2004: 53: 195-199.<br />

37. Egan C.G., Lavery R., Caporali F., Fondelli C., Laghi-Pasini F., Dotta F., Sorrentino<br />

V. Generalised reduction of putative endothelial progenitors and CXCR4-positive<br />

peripheral blood cells in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2008: 51: 1296-1305.<br />

38. Fadini G.P., Sartore S., Schiavon M., Albiero M., Baesso I., Cabrelle A., Agostini C.,<br />

Avogaro A. Diabetes impairs progenitor cell mobilization after hindlimb ischemiareperfusion<br />

injury in rats. Diabetologia 2006: 49: 3075-3084.<br />

20<br />

astragali and Radix rehmanniae in the ratio of 2:1 in enhancing<br />

wound healing in a chemically induced diabetic<br />

foot ulcer rat model (p


New reasons to share a smile!<br />

Visit our booth at the <strong>EWMA</strong> Conference to learn more about how Safetac minimises pain<br />

Much has happened in a year, and we can’t wait to share<br />

the most exciting news with you at this year’s <strong>EWMA</strong>!<br />

Come to our bobth to learn about our new and revolutionary products. Mepitel ® Film, a<br />

gentle transparent breathable film dressing for skin protection, is the world’s first film with<br />

Safetac ® , and one of many new reasons for patients and clinicians to smile!<br />

Presenting New Science<br />

In Pressure Ulcer Prevention<br />

Learn more about new science in pressure ulcer prevention when<br />

attending the Mölnlycke Health Care Satellite Symposium at the<br />

European Wound Management Association Conference, Vienna, <strong>2012</strong>.<br />

Thursday <strong>24</strong>th <strong>May</strong>, 13:15 to 14:15 in Room E1<br />

Despite the widespread use of prevention strategies, pressure ulceration remains<br />

a significant clinical and economic challenge to health care providers, as well as<br />

impacting negatively on the quality of life of patients, their families and carers.<br />

Chaired by Professor Michael Clark (President of the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory<br />

Panel), the goals of this symposium are to emphasise the importance of developing<br />

new strategies that will reduce the clinical, economic and social burden of pressure<br />

ulcers; and to present new scientific and clinical data relating to the use of five-layered<br />

soft silicone dressings as an adjunct to standard preventative interventions.<br />

Speakers – Professor Michael Clark, Paulo Alves, Professor Cees Oomens.<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2012</strong> VIENNA


Is the<br />

chemistry<br />

right? <strong>EWMA</strong><br />

When it comes to NPWT, the foam makes all the difference.<br />

A comparative study 1,2 by HARTMANN shows that for NPWT products, the type of foam used really does matter. Significant differences<br />

in the body's inflammatory response show that different foams can accelerate efficient wound healing. Could this make NPWT even more<br />

economical? Vivano. Safety. And Simplicity.<br />

You can find more information at our trade fair booth or at www.vivanosystem.info<br />

Source: 1 Croizat et al., Journal of Investigative Dermatology (2011) 131: S134. 2 Walch et al., Wound Repair and Regeneration (2011) 19: A91.<br />

<strong>2012</strong><br />

Visit our symposium:<br />

Hall E2 on Wednesday;<br />

23/05/12 at 12:30–1:30 pm


Presented at<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> 2011<br />

Brussels · Belgium<br />

Bacteriophages for the treatment<br />

of severe infections:<br />

A ‘new’ option for the future?<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The worldwide emergence of “Superbugs” and<br />

a dry antibiotic pipeline threaten a return to the<br />

pre­antibiotic era, i.e. prior to the 1940s when<br />

millions of people died of bacterial infection 1 .<br />

In hospitals in both high­income and lowincome<br />

countries, the majority of nosocomial<br />

outbreaks are caused by a small group of pathogens<br />

– Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus,<br />

Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumanni,<br />

Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacter species,<br />

hereafter referred to as “the ESKAPE bugs.”<br />

These ESKAPE bugs are increasingly prevalent<br />

in our hospitals and increasingly resistant to many<br />

of our antimicrobial agents threatening patients’<br />

lives and confronting society with huge socioeconomic<br />

costs 1 .<br />

While extensively drug resistant Acinetobacter<br />

baumannii, often associated with military operations<br />

(Iraq, Afghanistan), NDM­1 containing Enterobacteriaceae,<br />

pan­resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa<br />

clones and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus<br />

aureus (MRSA) are mainly prevalent in our hospitals,<br />

it seems that the community as a whole is<br />

threatened by these worrisome pathogens. This<br />

was demonstrated by the EAHEC 0104:H4 epidemic<br />

in Germany in 2011 2­5 . Some infectious<br />

agents are indeed not confined to human beings<br />

but actually deeply settled in our environment.<br />

Beside the overuse, and misuse of antibiotics in<br />

human medicine it seems also more and more evident<br />

that the animal food production sector serves<br />

as a major antibiotic consumer and consequently a<br />

reservoir for multi­drug resistant (MDR) bacteria.<br />

Our ever growing and crowded cities also seem<br />

to play a role in the emergence of these ESKAPE<br />

bugs 6­8 . Taking all this into account it is evident<br />

that the situation is alarming.<br />

A reflection on the biological role of natural, as<br />

well as (semi­)synthetic antibiotics, in nature as<br />

secondary metabolites and their use as antimi­<br />

crobial agents in human, veterinary and agro­bio<br />

industry reveals that we still have much to learn<br />

about these molecules. The lack of fundamental<br />

knowledge on the actual role of antibiotics (secondary<br />

metabolites often functioning as signalling<br />

molecules) in nature and their effect on living systems<br />

(bacteria) in relation with the whole ecological<br />

setting means that we actually disequilibrate<br />

our natural environment as a consequence of the<br />

mis/over use of those molecules. This biological<br />

phenomenon of antibiotic resistance is typically<br />

an emergent characteristic of a dynamic, highly<br />

complex and self­organizing system that evolves<br />

at the edge of chaos 9­10 .<br />

Antibiotics are typically studied and developed<br />

through models in which the bacteria are in a<br />

planktonic (free living and growing) life style, but<br />

most of the infections seem to be due to bacterial<br />

infectious foci, which mainly harbour bacteria<br />

that exhibit a biofilm life style 11 . It was shown by<br />

gene expression analysis that planktonic and biofilm<br />

lifestyle modes have distinct differential gene<br />

expression profiles. This affects, amongst other<br />

features, the bacterial sensitivity to antibiotics 12­13 .<br />

These bacterial biofilm­related findings imply<br />

that the mechanical barrier function of the biofilm<br />

is not the main reason why bacteria residing in a<br />

biofilm lifestyle mode do not respond as expected<br />

to antibiotics. Some antibiotics can diffuse into<br />

the biofilm complex and reach the bacteria, but<br />

as a consequence of the changed bacterial physiology<br />

and biochemical pathways in the biofilm<br />

modus some antibiotics cannot interfere with the<br />

biofilm bacteria in the same way as they would<br />

do with free living and proliferating planktonic<br />

bacteria. In a biofilm the bacterial growth rate is<br />

dramatically slowed down while the mechanical<br />

barrier protects them essentially from the immune<br />

system. Antibiotics were developed only taking<br />

into account the bacterium’s planktonic lifestyle,<br />

but we know today that biofilms play a major role<br />

�<br />

Science, Practice and Education<br />

1 Daniel De Vos, PhD<br />

1 Gilbert Verbeken, MSc<br />

1,2 Thomas Rose, MD<br />

2 Serge Jennes, MD<br />

1 Jean-Paul Pirnay, PhD<br />

1 Laboratory for Molecular<br />

and Cellular Technology,<br />

2 Burn Wound Centre,<br />

Queen Astrid Military<br />

Hospital, Brussels, Belgium<br />

Correspondence:<br />

daniel.devos2@mil.be<br />

Conflict of interest: none<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 23


THE <strong>EWMA</strong><br />

UNIVERSITY<br />

CONFERENCE<br />

MODEL (UCM)<br />

in Vienna<br />

The <strong>EWMA</strong> UCM programme offers students of wound<br />

management from institutes of higher education across Europe<br />

the opportunity to take part of their academic studies whilst<br />

participating in the <strong>EWMA</strong> Conference.<br />

The opportunity of participating in the <strong>EWMA</strong> UCM is available<br />

to all teaching institutions with wound management courses for<br />

health professionals.<br />

The UCM programme at the <strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2012</strong> Conference<br />

in Vienna will focus on increasing the networking opportunities<br />

between the students from various UCM groups participating<br />

in the programme this year.<br />

In addition to the main conference programme, UCM Lectures<br />

as well as assignments and workshops for mixed groups will<br />

be arranged specifically for the UCM students.<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> strongly encourages teaching institutions and students<br />

from all countries to benefit from the possibilities of international<br />

networking and access to lectures by many of the most<br />

experienced wound management experts in the world.<br />

Yours sincerely<br />

Zena Moore,<br />

Chair of the Education Committee, Immediate Past President<br />

Participating institutions:<br />

Donau Universität Krems<br />

Austria<br />

Haute École de Santé<br />

Geneva, Switzerland<br />

KATHO university college Roeselare<br />

Belgium<br />

University of Hertfordshire<br />

United Kingdom<br />

ienna<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

23-25 <strong>May</strong><br />

Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Lisboa<br />

Portugal<br />

HUB Brussels<br />

Belgium<br />

Lithuanian University of Health Sciences<br />

Lithuania<br />

Universidade Católica Portuguesa<br />

Porto, Portugal<br />

For further information about the <strong>EWMA</strong> UCM, please visit<br />

the Education section of the <strong>EWMA</strong> website www.ewma.org<br />

or contact the <strong>EWMA</strong> Secretariat at ewma@ewma.org<br />

in most infectious states 11 . New strategies, based on fundamental<br />

biofilm research to cope with this problem are<br />

under development. Recently, a review on bacterial biofilms<br />

was published in this journal by Antonio Fonseca 14 .<br />

Apart from the overuse and misuse of antibiotics there<br />

are thus several additional reasons for the antibiotic crisis<br />

which is partly a consequence of our current socio economic<br />

society 15 . The pharmaceutical industry is not eager<br />

to develop new antibiotics due to the long term resourceintensive<br />

research and development costs while knowing<br />

that eventually resistance will emerge and the return on<br />

investment will decrease. As the industry antibiotic pipeline<br />

is virtually dry and infectious diseases steadily on the<br />

increase, experts struggle to find acceptable solutions 16­<br />

18 . The use of bacteriophages, bacterio specific viruses, is<br />

currently being (re)considered as a sensible option. Last<br />

year several reports of clinical applications in animals and<br />

humans were published 19­<strong>24</strong> . With our actual knowledge<br />

we can consider that bacteriophages are not harmful for<br />

eukaryotic organisms, such as humans. Eukaryotic organisms<br />

include fungi, plants and animals (including humans).<br />

They typically have a specific membrane­bound<br />

nucleus with its specific biochemical enzyme systems and<br />

organelles in contrast to the prokaryotic bacteria. Thus<br />

bacteriophages are bacterio­specific viruses that naturally<br />

cannot infect and replicate in a eukaryotic cell. In order<br />

to enter their host cell they need specific outer membrane<br />

receptors beside the specific bacterial biochemical machinery<br />

for replication. Bacteriophages (meaning bacteria eaters)<br />

are in fact the bacteria’s natural predators. As such<br />

they keep bacterial populations growth under control.<br />

Wherever bacteria are present there are bacteriophages<br />

(or phages in short) which are generally present in at least<br />

a ten times higher order of magnitude than the bacteria<br />

themselves and consequently constitute the most abundant<br />

biological lifelike constituents of the biosphere of this<br />

planet 25 . This observation shows us that actually we live<br />

in an ocean of phages and have done since the dawn of<br />

the human species and that natural phages are in principle<br />

harmless to us. Ecologically they are key as bacterial controllers<br />

and it is this ‘natural function’ of bacteriophages<br />

that phage therapy is exploiting. In combination with or<br />

as substitute for antibiotics they could be a therapeutic<br />

option in the eradication or control of bacterial colonisations/infections.<br />

Indeed applying a specific natural lytic<br />

bacteriophage, targeted against a specific pathogenic bacterium,<br />

on for example an infected wound, should result in<br />

the lysis of the targeted bacterium after the amplification<br />

of the phage in the bacterial cell. As a result the wound<br />

would be cleared by the phage of its noxious bacteria. In<br />

fact the bacteriophage could be considered as a self am­<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2


plifying drug at the place of infection. Once the bacteria<br />

are eradicated (through lysis) or brought to a low enough<br />

density that the host’s immune system can take over the<br />

situation, the bacteriophages will also be eliminated by<br />

the host’s immune system.<br />

However today there is a lack of standardized evidencebased<br />

clinical research. This rediscovered antibacterial<br />

therapeutic approach, first proposed by d’Herelle almost<br />

a century ago, was only further developed, mostly empirically,<br />

in the former Soviet Empire 17­18, 26­29 . Since the<br />

early beginning of phage therapy this approach was continuously<br />

used in medical practice and empirically adapted<br />

so that today in countries like Georgia, phage therapy is<br />

considered an established medical practice not requiring<br />

any further questioning. To reintroduce it however in our<br />

actual medical practice requires clinical studies in accordance<br />

with current standards. But documenting a “lifelike”<br />

entity is not the same as documenting a chemical static<br />

substance, what an antibiotic in fact is. Also there is the<br />

aspect related to Intellectual Property Rights (IP) that after<br />

all looks to be the thorniest problem. Phage therapy could<br />

provide a sustainable solution for the multi­drug resistance<br />

crisis. Phage therapy is the use of natural exclusively lytic<br />

bacterio­specific viruses as antibacterial agent. In fact by<br />

setting up a screening system for the circulating noxious<br />

bacteria and their respective phages it will always be possible<br />

to obtain the right lytic phage against any emerging<br />

pathogen. This way of working, taking into account the<br />

co­evolution of the couplet bacterium/phage, makes it<br />

just a fitting solution for a sustainable antibacterial phage<br />

therapy industry. We think that phage therapy will surely<br />

have its (exclusive) application setting(s) and in addition<br />

could be used in combination (synergy) with antibiotics30<br />

. Studies show that phages can enhance antibiotic’s<br />

activity by interaction with the bacterial biofilm modus.<br />

The search for a specific phage or phage cocktail against<br />

a specific bacterium will not take the time nor require the<br />

costs of searching and developing a new antibiotic. The<br />

search for a potent natural phage and the preparation of<br />

classic galenic preparation (physiological water, basic ointment…)<br />

containing phages is practical and feasible in the<br />

time frame of days to weeks, in contrast to new antibiotics<br />

which require many years of research and development.<br />

If an infection is caused by a pan­resistant bacterium it<br />

is realistic to select a specific phage for clinical use, in<br />

contrast to the search of a new antibiotic.<br />

The clinical development of phage therapy however<br />

faces major obstacles, typical of the current medico­phar­<br />

maceutical environment, that hamper progress<br />

18, 28­29, 31<br />

n The lack of a specific adapted regulatory frame in the<br />

medicinal product regulations (mainly based on the<br />

classic static chemical drugs)<br />

Science, Practice and Education<br />

n It is difficult to obtain IP, and as a consequence<br />

difficult to find investors<br />

n The absence of well­defined, safe and targeted phage<br />

preparations (technically feasible, but due to the<br />

above mentioned reasons there are currently no<br />

dedicated therapeutic phage centres)<br />

n The societal false perception of viruses as ‘enemies<br />

of life’.<br />

AIM AND METHOD<br />

It was our aim to evaluate the potential of phage therapy<br />

and to bring it eventually to the patient.<br />

A multidisciplinary team of biologists, medical doctors<br />

and pharmacists was established and worked simultaneously,<br />

from the start, on different aspects, ranging from the<br />

regulatory to the in vitro and in vivo (clinical) experiments<br />

of this antibacterial treatment.<br />

n An exhaustive analysis of the current relevant drug or<br />

medicinal products regulatory frameworks was performed<br />

to analyse whether they could cater for phage<br />

therapy.<br />

n A small­scale production process for the preparation<br />

of quality controlled and well­defined phage cocktails<br />

for clinical use was set­up. The elaboration of<br />

this project involved several research groups and a<br />

clinical team. Parts of the quality control tests would<br />

be outsourced. The final goal was to use this bacteriophage<br />

cocktail as a topical treatment against MDR<br />

P. aeruginosa and MRSA infected wounds in a pilot<br />

trial in burn wound patients with the agreement of a<br />

Belgian Medical Ethical Committee.<br />

n To foster national and international interactions and<br />

to promote phage therapy in Europe, an international<br />

organization ‘Phages for Human Applications<br />

Group – Europe’ (P.H.A.G.E.) was created.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

An analysis of the regulatory framework and multiple discussions<br />

with several experts as well as the relevant competent<br />

authorities revealed that clinical phage therapy applications<br />

in the EU are possible, but that the regulatory<br />

frame is not well­adapted 28­29 .<br />

Although the development of phages as classical<br />

medicinal products like an antibiotics, including Good<br />

Manufacturing Practices (GMP) production, pre­clinical<br />

and phase I, II and III clinical trial and marketing is possible,<br />

it is, in our opinion, not the most appropriate route<br />

Such a developmental path would cost millions of Euros<br />

and take many years (± 10 years for biologicals). These<br />

investments are not compatible with the apparent lack of<br />

Intellectual Property (IP) protection (at least for natural<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 25<br />


phages). Phages, as natural entities, belong to mankind<br />

as a whole, and cannot be patented in the classical sense.<br />

Also the idea of phage therapy itself first put forward by<br />

Felix d’Herelle who coined the name of bacteriophages<br />

meaning ‘bacterium eating entities’, cannot, in principle,<br />

be patented since it belongs to the common knowledge<br />

and has done for almost a century. This situation does not<br />

stimulate the industry to invest, since the actual paradigm<br />

is “no IP, no investment” 15 ­18 .<br />

To overcome this embarrassing situation, new views<br />

and consequent ways of (pharmaceutical) industrial models<br />

have to be developed 29 .<br />

Established pharmaceutical companies are not likely<br />

to invest substantial amounts of money and time in the<br />

development of potentially interesting products that will<br />

need to be adapted (evolve) even more quickly than flu<br />

vaccines, to be effective. This fast adaptation is needed to<br />

exploit the main advantage of phages over classical ‘static’<br />

drugs such as antibiotics, namely their ability to rapidly (in<br />

a matter of days to weeks) evolve to target emerging pathogenic<br />

strains. This is possible by continuously screening<br />

bacteria and their phages, as is also done in Georgia. This<br />

“Sur­mesure” or tailor­made pathway for the future implementation<br />

of phage therapy is proposed and discussed<br />

by Pirnay et al 29 . This view is also what was proposed to<br />

the Innovation Task Force (ITF) at EMA. The discussion<br />

is still ongoing.<br />

Non profit institutions like hospitals that would like<br />

to develop phage therapy are not necessarily disheartened<br />

by the IP issues and the uncertainty of large profits, but<br />

are generally unable to generate the necessary funding and<br />

are furthermore most likely better served by a tailor­made<br />

(e.g. to a patient or an outbreak) approach 29 . This means<br />

that in a timeframe of days to weeks a specific phage can<br />

always be found to target a specific emerging pathogen.<br />

It is this specific power of phage therapy, namely its coevolutionary<br />

aspect, which guarantees an efficient antibacterial<br />

agent when needed.<br />

As a result of this conundrum, until now, only local<br />

and sporadic phage applications were performed in the<br />

Western World, often under the umbrella of the Declaration<br />

of Helsinki. In Poland, an EU member state, a specific<br />

national adaptive regulation, based on the Declaration of<br />

Helsinki, was issued to regulate phage therapy. A medical<br />

doctor is allowed to apply phage therapy where proven<br />

therapeutic methods do not exist or have been ineffective<br />

(e.g. MDR infections) and provided that the patient or his<br />

legal representative signs an informed consent.<br />

In France, Dr. Alain Dublanchet, a veteran of phage<br />

therapy, occasionally applies phages in desperate osteomyelitis<br />

cases and with success <strong>24</strong>, 29 In Australia, phage<br />

therapy was recently applied under the umbrella of “compassionate<br />

use” for the successful treatment of refractory<br />

P. aeruginosa urinary tract infection in a cancer patient <strong>24</strong> .<br />

26<br />

Figure 1.<br />

BFC-1 transmission electron micrographs (.<br />

a) P. aeruginosa bacteriophage 14/1, a member of the<br />

Myoviridae family. Bar: 100 nm.<br />

b) PNM bacteriophages (Podoviridae) freed from a burst<br />

P. aeruginosa bacterium. Bar: 500 nm.<br />

c) Bacteriophage 14/1 attaching to the P. aeruginosa cell wall.<br />

Bar: 200 nm.<br />

d) ISP bacteriophages (Myoviridae) attaching to S. aureus.<br />

Bar: 500 nm.<br />

Ref. 26 Merabishvili et al 2009.<br />

In Belgium a basic clinical safety trial was performed with<br />

the approval of a leading Medical Ethical Committee.<br />

Clinical trials of course need safe and well­defined<br />

phages. Therefore a phage cocktail (BFC­1) that targeted<br />

the most prevalent MDR P. aeruginosa and MRSA bacteria<br />

was produced. The cocktail consisted of two phages<br />

against P. aeruginosa and one against S. aureus (Fig. 1). It<br />

was produced on a small scale and in accordance with basic<br />

clinical­pharmaceutical standards (sterility, apyrogenicity,<br />

pH, cytotoxicity, adequate shelf life and stability). In<br />

addition, the phages in BFC­1 were proven to be exclusively<br />

lytic and characterized at the genomic and proteomic<br />

level. This specific production process was published by<br />

Merabishvili et al. 32 and is actually used as a basic discussion<br />

document for future adaptations in the regulatory<br />

documentation process.<br />

BFC­1 was applied, in a small pilot study, in the burn<br />

unit of the Queen Astrid Military Hospital (9 patients,<br />

10 applications) (Fig. 2). This was one of the first unconcealed<br />

phage applications in modern Western medicine.<br />

As expected, no adverse events or side effects were observed<br />

based on clinical as well as laboratory­measurable param­<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2


Figure 2.a.<br />

The final product, a bacteriophage cocktail ready for use<br />

in a human clinical trial. (Ref 26)<br />

Figure 2.b.<br />

Application of BFC-1 on an infected burn wound using a syringe<br />

spray. (Ref 26)<br />

Actually phages could be applied by a spray or a galenic ointment<br />

formulation. Before application on wounds the wound bed should<br />

always be cleaned, debrided and rinsed with bicarbonated<br />

physiological water in order to provide a neutral pH environment.<br />

This is to allow the phages to be stable. Too acidic or alkaline<br />

environments cause phage degradation (protein denaturation).<br />

Studies are warranted in order to optimize applications and<br />

frequency of application as well as the type of the most suited<br />

galenic formulation in function for the site of use.<br />

eters. This small pilot safety trial, showing the innocuity<br />

of phages when applied to burns, was discussed in a review<br />

by Kutter and colleagues 27 . In addition, we successfully<br />

applied (systemically, through a wound drain) large quantities<br />

of BFC­1 (300 ml of 10 5 phage particles), under the<br />

Declaration of Helsinki, in a critical pelvic trauma patient<br />

with MDR P. aeruginosa and MRSA osteomyelitis.<br />

Over the years, it has become clear that, in order to develop<br />

phage therapy, an adapted regulatory framework<br />

and eventually even a change in (medical/pharmaceutical)<br />

mentality and developmental models needs to be achieved.<br />

Especially the natural evolutionary and sustainability aspects<br />

of the approach, not compatible with our current<br />

bio/pharmaceutical business models where IP issues are at<br />

the core, have to be taken into consideration when developing<br />

phage therapy. The P.H.A.G.E. network allowed<br />

us to discuss fundamental and practical issues such as the<br />

Science, Practice and Education<br />

status of phages (e.g. are they (classical) drugs?), exchange<br />

information on applications and services and subsequently<br />

to efficiently interact with authorities like the European<br />

Medicines Agency (EMA).<br />

In February 2011 we officially interpellated the EU<br />

parliament: ‘what is the status of phage as antibacterial<br />

agent’ which brought the discussion to the European<br />

level. The question was put on the agenda by the Belgian<br />

Christian democrat Ivo Belet and his colleague Catherine<br />

Trautmann from the Socialist faction in France. The<br />

Commission’s view was that the current regulatory framework<br />

was sufficient for “phage therapy”, a standpoint we<br />

clearly don’t share. Indeed if we consider the phage as a<br />

static chemical substance we cannot develop phage therapy<br />

as it should be developed in a sustainable efficacious way<br />

and tailor made as discussed by Pirnay et al 29 .<br />

Concerning the “false perception of viruses as enemies of<br />

life” obstacle, which we feared when starting our clinical<br />

trial, we found – to our surprise – that it was easily resolved<br />

through clear and scientific communication with<br />

the members of the ethical committee as well as the medical<br />

and nursing staff of the hospital.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Natural phages are not straightforward inanimate and stable<br />

substances, but rather lifelike evolvable natural biological<br />

entities. The major obstacle hampering the further development<br />

of phage therapy at large, in wound treatment<br />

as well as in other clinical settings (otitis, osteomyelitis,<br />

diabetic foot, diarrhoea, impetigo…) in our current medical/pharmaceutical<br />

environment is mainly related to the<br />

intellectual IP issues.<br />

The existing relevant regulatory frameworks and business<br />

models are not compatible with a dynamic sustainable<br />

phage therapy concept. And this point of view is not compatible<br />

with the current economic models that reduce the<br />

pharmaceutical industry to ‘common button’ producers,<br />

when their main societal role should be ‘providing people<br />

with adequate products for a better health’. Therefore a<br />

suitable environment should be worked out 28­29 . We need<br />

to radically redesign our (pharmaceutical) economic models<br />

to cater for more dynamic and sustainable approaches<br />

that fit an eventual future green economy. We are actually<br />

bouncing against our own ‘limits’ of growth 33­34 .<br />

Any future sustainable phage therapy concept should,<br />

based on scientific grounds, fully acknowledge the potentialities<br />

of the co­evolutionary aspect of the couplet<br />

phage/bacterium in its ecological environment, in casu the<br />

human being 29 . Only then the inherent (positive) characteristics<br />

of phages as natural biological bacterium controllers<br />

can be put to use. Indeed, bacteria will inevitably<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 27<br />


Science, Practice and Education<br />

become resistant to phages, but due to the continuously<br />

ongoing arms race between the two protagonists, specific<br />

phages able to infect the formerly resistant bacterial strains<br />

will quickly emerge 29 . In fact phage therapy fits well in<br />

the new emerging field of Darwinian – evolutionary –<br />

medicine (in contrast to a classical mechanistic – man<br />

as a machine – view) where the insights of evolution are<br />

fully taken into account. Viruses, among which phages are<br />

included, were involved in the origin of life itself and play<br />

a major role in biological evolution 35­36 . Hopefully they<br />

will play a role in the future control of bacterial disease.<br />

We feel that our plea for a more realistic approach, taking<br />

into account the co­evolutionary aspect of the bacterium<br />

and its phage is scientifically sound. Let’s hope that the<br />

political and economic factors will adapt. m<br />

References<br />

1. Rice LB. Federal funding for the study of antimicrobial resistance in nosocomial<br />

pathogens: no ESKAPE. J Infect Dis 2008: 197(8): 1079-81.<br />

2. Levy SB, Marshall B. Antibacterial resistance worldwide: causes, challenges and<br />

responses. Nat Med 2004: 10 (12): S122-9.<br />

3. Kumarasamy K, Toleman MA, Walsh TR, Bagaria J, Butt F, Balakrishnan R,<br />

Chaudhary U, Doumith M, Giske CG, Irfan S, Krishnan P, Kumar AV, Maharjan S,<br />

Mushtaq S, Noorie T, Paterson DL, Pearson A, Perry C, Pike R, Rao B, Ray U, Sarma<br />

JB, Sharma M, Sheridan E, Thirunarayan MA, Turton J, Upadhyay S, Warner M,<br />

Welfare W, Livermore DM, Woodford N. Emergence of a new antibiotic resistance<br />

mechanism in India, Pakistan, and the UK: a molecular, biological, and epidemiological<br />

study. Lancet Infect Dis 2010: 10(9): 597-602.<br />

4. Brzuskiewicz E, Thurmer A, Schuldes J, Leinbach A, Lieregang H, Meyer FD, Boelter<br />

J, Petersen H, Gottschalk G, Daniel R. Genome sequence analyses of two isolates<br />

from the recent Escherichia coli outbreak in Germany reveal the emergence of a new<br />

pathogen type Entero-Aggregative-Haemorrhagic-Escherichia coli (EAHEC). Arch<br />

Microbial 2011: 193: Epub ahead of print.<br />

5. Pirnay JP, De Vos D, Cochez C, Bilocq F, Pirson J, Struelens M, Duinslaeger L,<br />

Cornelis P, Zizi M, Vanderkelen A. Molecular epidemiology of Pseudomonas<br />

aeruginosa colonization in a burn unit: persistence of a multidrug-resistant clone and<br />

a silver sulfadiazine-resistant clone. J Clin Microbiol 2003: 41(3): 1192-202.<br />

6. Kümmerer K, Henninger A. Promoting resistance by the emission of antibiotics from<br />

hospitals and households into effluent. Clin Microbiol Infect 2003: 9(12):1203-14.<br />

28<br />

Are you interested in<br />

submitting an article or paper<br />

for <strong>EWMA</strong> Journal?<br />

Read our author guidelines at<br />

www.ewma.org/english/authorguide<br />

7. Kümmerer K. Resistance in the environment. J Antimicrob Chemother 2004: 54(2):<br />

311-20.<br />

8. Allen HK, Donato J, Wang HH, Cloud-Hansen KA, Davies J, Handelsman J. Call of<br />

the wild: antibiotic resistance genes in natural environments. Nat Rev Microbiol<br />

2010: 8(4): 251-259.<br />

9. Martinez JL, Baquero F. Interactions among strategies associated with bacterial<br />

infection: pathogenicity, epidemicity, and antibiotic resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev<br />

2002: 15(4): 647-79.<br />

10. Baquero F, Coque TM, Canton R. Antibiotics, complexity and evolution. ASM News.<br />

2003: 69(11): 547-52.<br />

11. Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of<br />

persistent infections. Science 1999: 284(5418): 1318-22.<br />

12. Whiteley M, Bangera MG, Burngarner RE, Parsek MR, Teitzel GM, Lorry S,<br />

Greenberg EP. Gene expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Nature 2001:<br />

413(6858): 860-4.<br />

13. Beloin C, Valle J, Latour-Lambert P, Faure P, Kzreminski M, Balestrino D, Haagensen<br />

JAJ, Molin S, Prensier G, Arbeille B, Ghigo JM. Global impact of mature<br />

biofilm lifestyle on Escherichia coli K-12 gene expression. Mol Microbiol 2004: 51(3):<br />

659-74.<br />

14. Fonseca AP. Biofilms in wounds: an unsolved problem? <strong>EWMA</strong> Journal. 2011:<br />

11(2): 10-23.<br />

15. Pirnay JP, De Vos D , Zizi M , Heyman P. No easy way to exterminate ‘superbugs’ at<br />

the dawn of the third millennium. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2003: 1(4): 523-25.<br />

16. Bush K , Courvalin P , Dantas G , Davies J , Eisentstein B , Huovinen P , Jacoby GA ,<br />

Kishony R , Kreiswirth BN , Kutter E , Lerner SA , Levy S , Lewis K , Lomovskaya O ,<br />

Miller, JH , Mobashery S , Piddock LJV , Projan S , Thomas CM , Tomasz A , Tulkens<br />

PM , Walsh TR , Watson JD , Witkowski J , Witte W , Wright G , Yeh P, Zgurskaya<br />

HI. Tackling antibiotic resistance. Nat Rev Microbiol 2011: 9(11): 894-96.<br />

17. Maura D, Debarbieux L. Bacteriophages as twenty-first century antibacterial tools for<br />

food and medicine. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2011: 90(3): 851-9.<br />

18. Thiel K. Old dogma, new tricks-21st . century phage therapy. Nature Biotechnol<br />

2004: 22(1): 31-6.<br />

19. Markoishvili K, Tsitlanatze G, Katsarava R, Morris JG Jr, Sulakvelidze A. A novel<br />

sustained-release matrix based on biodegradable poly(ester amide)s and impregnated<br />

with bacteriophages and an antibiotic shows promise in management of<br />

infected venous stasis ulcers and other poorly healing wounds. Int J Dermatol. 2002:<br />

41(7): 453-8.<br />

20. Marza JA, Soothill JS, Boydell P, Collyns TA. Multiplication of therapeutically<br />

administered bacteriophages in Pseudomonas aeruginosa infected patients. Burns<br />

2006: 32(5):644-6.<br />

21. McVay CS, Velasquez M, Fralick JA. Phage therapy of Pseudomonas aeruginosa<br />

infection in a mouse burn wound model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007:<br />

51(6): 1934-8.<br />

22. Rhoads DD, Wolcott RD, Kuskowski MA, Wolcott BM, Ward LS, Sulakvelidze A.<br />

Bacteriophage therapy of venous leg ulcers in humans: results of a phase I safety<br />

trial. J Wound Care. 2009: 18(6):237-43.<br />

23. Kumari S, Hariai K, Chibber S. Bacteriophage versus antimicrobial agents for the<br />

treatment of murine burn wound infection caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae B5055.<br />

J Med Microbiol. 2011: 60(Pt2): 205-10.<br />

<strong>24</strong>. Khawalkaled A, Morales S, Dillon B, Alavidze Z, Ginn AN, Thomas L, Chapman SJ,<br />

Dublanchet A, Smithyman A, Iredell JR. Bacteriophage therapy for refractory<br />

Pseudomonas aeruginosa urinary tract infection. J Med Microbiol 2011: 60(11):<br />

1697-700.<br />

25. Hendrix RW. Bacteriophages: evolution of the majority. Theor Popul Biol 2002:<br />

61(4): 471-80.<br />

26. D’Herelle F. Sur un microbe invisible antagoniste des bactéries dysentériques. C R<br />

Acad Sci 1917: 165: 373-5.<br />

27. Kutter E, De Vos D, Gvasalia G, Alavidze Z, Gogokhia L, Kuhl S, Abedon ST. Phage<br />

therapy in clinical practice: treatment of human infections. Curr Pharm Biotechnol<br />

2010: 11(1): 69-86.<br />

28. Verbeken G, De Vos D, Vaneechoutte M, Merabishvili M, Zizi M, Pirnay JP.<br />

European regulatory conundrum of phage therapy. Future Microbiol 2007: 2(5):<br />

485-91.<br />

29. Pirnay JP, De Vos D, Verbeken G, Merabishvili M, Chanishvili N, Vaneechoutte M,<br />

Zizi M, Laire G, Lavigne R, Huys I, Van den Mooter G, Buckling A, Debarbieux L,<br />

Pouillot F, Azeredo J, Kutter E, Dublanchet A, Gorski A, Adamia R. The Phage<br />

paradigm: prêt-à-porter or sur-mesure? Pharm Res 2010: 28(4): 934-7.<br />

30. Comeau AM, Tétart F, Trojet SN, Prère MF, Krish HM. Phage-antibiotic synergy<br />

(PAS): beta-lactam and quinolone antibiotics stimulate virulent phagegrowth. PLoS<br />

One 2007: 2(8): e799.<br />

31. Villarreal LP. Overall issues of viruses and host evolution. In: Villareal LP, ed. Viruses<br />

and the Evolution of Life. W. A., USA: ASM press; 2005 p. 1-28.<br />

32. Merabishvili M, Pirnay JP, Verbeken G, Chanishvili N, Tediashvili M, Lashki N, Gionti<br />

T, Krylov V, Mast J, Van Parijs L, Lavigne R, Volckaert G, Matheus W, Verween G,<br />

De Corte P, Rose T, Jennes S, Zizi M, De Vos D, Vaneechoutte M. Quality-controlled<br />

small-scale production of a well-defined bacteriophage cocktail for use in human<br />

clinical trials. PLoS One. 2009: 4: e4944.<br />

33. The Group of Lisbon. Limits to Competition. Cambridge, Mass., USA: The MIT<br />

Press; 1995.<br />

34. Sachs JD. Common Wealth: economics for a crowded planet. London, UK: Penguin,<br />

2008.<br />

35. Buckling A, Rainey PB. Antagonistic coevolution between a bacterium and a<br />

bacteriophage. Proc Biol Sci 2002: 269(1494): 931-6.<br />

36. Villarreal LP, Witzany G. Viruses are essential agents within the roots and stem of the<br />

tree of life. J Theor Biol 2010: 262(4): 698-710.<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2


d by<br />

STRENGTH • ABSORBENCY • CONFIDENCE<br />

More to love about<br />

AQUACEL ® dressings<br />

NEW AQUACEL ®<br />

EXTRA dressing:<br />

• 9x stronger 1a<br />

• 39% more absorbent 1a<br />

• Manages a wide range of exudate levels<br />

AQUACEL ®<br />

Dressings<br />

TRIED. TRUE.<br />

Hydrofiber ® dressing with strengthening fiber<br />

TRUSTED. TM<br />

<br />

To find out more about AQUACEL ® EXTRA<br />

dressing, please visit www.convatec.com<br />

a As compared to original AQUACEL ® dressing.<br />

Reference: 1. Preliminary assessment of the physical properties of AQUACEL ® EXTRA TM and<br />

AQUACEL ® Dressings. Scientific Background Report. WHRI3461 TA214. 2011, Data on File,<br />

ConvaTec Inc.<br />

AQUACEL and Hydrofiber are registered trademarks of ConvaTec Inc.<br />

AQUACEL EXTRA and Tried. True. Trusted. are trademarks of ConvaTec Inc.<br />

© <strong>2012</strong> ConvaTec Inc. AP-011601-MM [AM/EM]


“ Highly absorbent – easy to use.”<br />

Vliwasorb ® adhesive<br />

The self-adhesive superabsorber<br />

NEW<br />

optimal treatment, especially of<br />

difficult-to-dress areas of the body<br />

better quality of life thanks to<br />

optimal exudate management<br />

high absorption and binding capacity<br />

www.Lohmann-Rauscher.com<br />

9503885 0412 e


Presented at<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> 2011<br />

Brussels · Belgium<br />

Developing evidence-based ways of working:<br />

Science, Practice and Education<br />

Employing interdisciplinary team<br />

working to improve patient outcomes in<br />

diabetic foot ulceration – our experience<br />

1. HISTORy AND INTRODUCTION<br />

The treatment of wounds is an ancient area of<br />

“specialization in medical practice”. Its origins<br />

trace to ancient Egypt and Greece. The most profound<br />

advances in the field came with the development<br />

of microbiology and cellular pathology<br />

in the 19 th century. In the 1870s, R.W Johnson,<br />

the cofounder of Johnson & Johnson, began the<br />

production of gauze and wound dressings with<br />

Iodine. In the late 19 th century P.L. Friedrich<br />

introduced the importance of wound excision, a<br />

procedure that reduced the risk of infection and<br />

thus surgery was on board….<br />

The diabetic clinic at the Deaconess Hospital in<br />

Boston can be considered as one of the first to<br />

instigate a multidisciplinary approach in diabetic<br />

wound care, bear in mind that the discovery of<br />

insulin was still a few years ahead! The teaching<br />

of diabetic foot care was considered so important<br />

that by 1928 they had assigned one graduate nurse<br />

and two pupil nurses to that duty. 1<br />

From the moment we use the term “specialization<br />

in different fields of wound care” we are<br />

already speaking about multidisciplinarity.<br />

2. DEFINITION OF A<br />

MULTIDISCIPLINARy TEAM<br />

We have found some different explanations/definitions<br />

of a multidisciplinary team:<br />

“…A group of people with different kinds of<br />

training and experience working together, usually<br />

on an ongoing basis. Professionals often use the<br />

word “discipline” to mean a field of study such<br />

as medicine, social work, or education…” (www.<br />

dwp.gov.uk department for work and pensions).<br />

“A group composed of members with varied<br />

but complementary experience, qualifications,<br />

and skills that contribute to the achievement of<br />

the organization’s specific objectives” (Oxford<br />

Dictionary).<br />

“A multidisciplinary team is composed of<br />

members from different healthcare professions<br />

with specialized skills and expertise. The members<br />

coordinate and communicate with each other to<br />

provide quality patient care. Coordination and<br />

teamwork among clinicians results in greater efficiency<br />

and improved clinical outcomes” (Journal<br />

of Healthcare Quality, March/April 2004). 2<br />

In our further work we try to clarify why the use<br />

of some words will play a major role and why<br />

perhaps the terminology of multidisciplinarity is<br />

not our favourite in our context of teams concerning<br />

wound care.<br />

3. WHy WE SHOULD USE<br />

INTERDISCIPLINARy IN THE CONTExT<br />

OF WOUND CARE?<br />

A two-step approach<br />

a. Difference between professionals and<br />

disciplines.<br />

We are privileged that an expert as respected as<br />

Paul Gorman wrote several articles and books<br />

about multidisciplinary teams. He helped us to<br />

understand the differences and nuances between<br />

professionals and disciplines. 3<br />

It’s fascinating to question why we have developed<br />

different disciplines in medicine. As human<br />

beings we have learnt that specialization enables<br />

us to know more about things. Receiving greater<br />

depth of knowledge will give us greater control<br />

over that part of our world and our environment.<br />

At the same time, other people have specialist<br />

knowledge about other things. Coming together<br />

we will have an even greater area of knowledge.<br />

Knowledge, but also status, reward and power, are<br />

divided by the boundaries of professions and disciplines.<br />

To demonstrate this Paul Gorman gave<br />

us the following examples: doctors get paid better<br />

than nurses and in some environments, have more<br />

status and power. Gender too plays a crucial role<br />

�<br />

Kristien Van Acker<br />

Diabetologist, Md, PhD<br />

Chimay, Rumst,<br />

Vice Chair DFP, IDF,<br />

Consultant Trop Inst<br />

Antwerp, Belgium<br />

Correspondence:<br />

stiebertje.viroin@<br />

gmail.com<br />

Conflict of interest: none<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 31


in the way professions operate internally and the way they<br />

interact with each other. This lead to defining the mission<br />

statements of the professional bodies (e.g. podiatry,<br />

chiropody and nursing); in history we see the development<br />

of professional bodies, acting as gatekeepers to the professions.<br />

Those bodies control the right to practice and will<br />

protect the public from charlatans, and this can only be<br />

seen as an advantage. However an individual, namely a patient,<br />

is not approached on a daily basis by the professional<br />

bodies but by medical teams. For this reason, it’s preferable<br />

to speak in terms of multidisciplinary teams (MTs) instead<br />

of multi-professional teams. In MTs members of staff, like<br />

auxiliaries, receptionists, and all the others also have a<br />

central role. Another important point is that the patients<br />

and their relatives have also a central place, which is not<br />

in the case in a multi­ professional team.<br />

b. Difference between multidisciplinary (MTs) and<br />

interdisciplinary teams (ITs)<br />

In 2007 Rebecca L Jessup from Australia was one of the<br />

first to adopt the concept of interdisciplinary teams and<br />

their skills and behavior 4 .<br />

According to Paul Gorman, MTs utilize the skills<br />

and experience of individuals from different disciplines,<br />

with each discipline approaching the patient from its own<br />

perspective. More often than not, this approach involves<br />

separate individual consultations. These may occur in a<br />

“one­stop­shop” fashion with all consultations occurring<br />

as part of a single appointment on a single day. It is common<br />

for this team to meet regularly, in the absence of the<br />

patient, to “case conference” findings and discuss future<br />

directions for the patient’s care. MTs provide more knowledge<br />

and experience than disciplines operating in isolation.<br />

ITs, however, integrate separate discipline approaches<br />

into a single consultation, i.e. the patient­history taking.<br />

The team, together with the patient, conducts assessment,<br />

diagnosis, intervention and short­ and long­term management<br />

goals at the one time. The patient is intimately<br />

involved in any discussions regarding their condition or<br />

prognosis and the plans about their care. Individuals from<br />

different disciplines, as well as the patient themselves, are<br />

encouraged to question each other and explore alternate<br />

avenues, stepping out of discipline silos to work toward<br />

the best outcome for the patient. In these processes, family<br />

members and partners will also be involved in the plans<br />

about the care of their family member. Those who have<br />

experience in this approach will immediately recognize a<br />

personal expression: “working in the order of chaos!” The<br />

energy and general demands are huge but the rewards are<br />

great, and perhaps the most important benefit is the richness<br />

of the contacts of team members with the patients<br />

and their family with, in return, the confidence the patient<br />

gives back even when prognosis is poor.<br />

32<br />

4. WHAT CAN BE CONSIDERED AS<br />

“PRACTICAL” GOLDEN RULES<br />

For teambuilding and working in an interdisciplinary<br />

team? 5-9<br />

No­one anywhere can start such an Interdisciplinary Team<br />

Project without a respectable time of preparation and a<br />

clear concept of the project management in which he/she<br />

has to take at least four characteristics into account: definite<br />

duration, examine the logic relationship with other<br />

activities in the project, study the resource consumption<br />

of this team (information, energy, know how, time and<br />

financial resources) together with the associated costs. This<br />

means that at the very least, for long­term success, a person<br />

must develop a business plan and management skills.<br />

The initiative taker will define roles and boundaries.<br />

Everyone needs clarity on his/her own role and it has to<br />

be clear to each member what other team members do.<br />

The team coordinator has to be aware of power dynamics<br />

within the group, i.e. are certain members competing<br />

for control? Or do some have more status than others?<br />

The process of “taking decisions” must be analyzed on<br />

a constant basis in the team; how, who and when is important.<br />

Team members must learn to value each other’s<br />

contributions and look at how the group communicates.<br />

In addition, they have to be aware that “different professionals<br />

have different views” and that this is the added<br />

value of the concept.<br />

Implementation of feed­back loops for self­evaluation<br />

is helpful in detecting some barriers and is of utmost importance<br />

to the success of ensuring members do not underestimate<br />

the value of listening to service users (patients).<br />

Often small details are huge barriers to team success. Some<br />

of the biggest barriers include unclear goals, unhealthy<br />

communication, playing it ‘safe’, individual goals and poor<br />

leadership.<br />

5. INTERDISCIPLINARy TEAMS IN DIABETIC<br />

FOOT WOUND CARE<br />

a. Rationale and evidenced based data<br />

One example of where building an interdisciplinary team<br />

is useful and effective is the diabetic foot team. We refer to<br />

the International Consensus of the Diabetic Foot, audited<br />

by Karel Bakker and first launched in 1996 and the fourth<br />

edition recently launched at the International Diabetic<br />

Foot Meeting in <strong>May</strong> 2011 in Noordwijkerhout 10 .<br />

In this consensus the following statements can be<br />

found: “If you have a foot problem, you should obtain<br />

foot care from a multidisciplinary foot team. A multidisciplinary<br />

approach has been shown to bring about a 45­85%<br />

decrease in amputations”. This sounds impressive, so what<br />

are the references and the associated evidence?<br />

The first publication on multidisciplinary diabetic foot<br />

clinics was published in 1986 by Mike Edmonds in which<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2


he illustrated the improved survival of the diabetic foot<br />

and the role of a specialized foot clinic. 11 In 2005 Lavery<br />

LA published the outcome of a study of 2738 persons<br />

with diabetes carried out over 28 months. Stratification<br />

into low and high­risk groups was performed with the<br />

implementation of preventive or acute care protocols.<br />

The outcome was impressive: a 47% decrease of the incidence<br />

of amputations; 38% reduction in foot­related<br />

hospital admissions; 22% reduction of average hospital<br />

days and 70% reduction in SNF (skilled nursing facilities)<br />

admissions. 12 This model has been widely replicated; the<br />

group of Gerry Ryman 13 illustrated a significant reduction<br />

in total and major amputation rates in a defined U.K.<br />

population measured over an 11­year period (1995­2005)<br />

following improvements in foot care services including<br />

multidisciplinary teamwork. Expressed as incidence per<br />

10,000 people with diabetes, total amputations fell 70%,<br />

from 53.2 to 16.0, and major amputations fell 82%, from<br />

36.4 to 6.7. This was also the result of a continuous prospective<br />

audit.<br />

b. How to establish a diabetic foot clinic<br />

Some years ago, the IWGDF convened a roundtable meeting<br />

to discuss the principles of organizing a diabetic foot<br />

clinic. We published these data in the Time to Act in the<br />

year of the “Diabetic Foot”, 2005 14 . The idea of the working<br />

group was to make a distinction between three models:<br />

The minimal model or basic model, the intermediate<br />

model, and the centres of excellence also called tertiary<br />

referral centres model. In practice, the gradual process<br />

towards excellence is initiated by a dedicated individual,<br />

a “local champion”, working in a very small team. More<br />

often than not, this person drives the project for many<br />

years and he or she assumes much of the responsibility<br />

from the start.<br />

Please visit the IWGDF website for more information: www.iwgdf.org<br />

Science, Practice and Education<br />

In Table 1 we present the three models and refer to<br />

the publication of Time to Act for more details. By accepting<br />

the concept of this “Three Level Model”, we are<br />

aware that referral patterns between these levels of care in<br />

this global organization must be clearly defined. This will<br />

only be possible if the organization in the country has a<br />

well­established centre of excellence. Good structures will<br />

have a positive influence on reducing delays in referrals!<br />

c. The importance of feedback loops and benchmarking:<br />

Quality control<br />

Delivery of good diabetic foot care is also dependent on<br />

the need for feedback and self reflection if we are to witness<br />

improvements in the performance of the teams which in<br />

turn lead to improvements in the delivery and outcome<br />

of the medical care 15 . To evaluate the input, or the intervention<br />

(e.g. “multidisciplinary diabetic foot clinic”)<br />

and the process itself we have to register the outcome<br />

parameters for our evaluation. There are many examples<br />

of such processes. One of the modern techniques used is<br />

benchmarking.<br />

One of the first important studies to compare differences<br />

by centre is the EURODIALE 16­18 . In this study (a<br />

prospective cohort study of 1232 consecutive individuals)<br />

we learned that treatment of many patients is not in line<br />

with current guidelines and there are large differences between<br />

countries and centres. At study entry, 77% of the<br />

patients had inadequate or no offloading. During followup,<br />

casting was used in 35% (0­68% variation between<br />

countries!) of the plantar fore­ or midfoot ulcers. Vascular<br />

imaging was performed in 56% (14­86%) of patients with<br />

severe limb ischemia; while revascularization was (only)<br />

performed in 43%.<br />

At the current moment only two countries, namely<br />

Germany and Belgium, are known to have this quality<br />

control system. In the disease­management programme<br />

in Germany, providers are obliged to refer high­risk feet,<br />

ulceration and suspicion of diabetic osteoarthropathy to<br />

specialized diabetic foot clinics at predefined interfaces.<br />

Table 1: The Different Models of Diabetic Foot Care according to the IWGDF.<br />

Minimal Model Intermediate Model Maximal Model<br />

Staff Doctor/nurse or Doctor or General Physician<br />

Diabetologist/surgeon/rehabilitation<br />

podiatrist<br />

Surgeon<br />

specialist/microbiologist/dermatologist/<br />

Podiatrist and/Nurse<br />

Psychiatrist/nurse/educator/podiatrist/<br />

Orthotist<br />

casting technician/secretarial staff...<br />

Aim Prevention and basic Prevention and basic curative care for Prevention and specialized curative care<br />

curative care<br />

all types of patients and advanced assessment<br />

and diagnosis<br />

provide training for other centres<br />

Patients Own patients From the regional catchment area of National, regional or even international<br />

the hospital with possibly some referrals<br />

from outside the region<br />

reference centre<br />

Setting Small regional hospital, Hospital<br />

health centres<br />

Reference centre (Third line centre)<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 33<br />


Science, Practice and Education<br />

An interdisciplinary Diabetic Foot Team in action: Order in the Chaos. Diabetic Foot Clinic – Kristien Van Acker<br />

Standards of Quality for Specialized Diabetic Foot Clinics<br />

according to the Criteria of the Diabetic Foot Working<br />

Group of the German Diabetes Association (DDG) are<br />

based on Structural quality (equipment, documentation,<br />

and staff); Structural­ and Process quality (interdisciplinary<br />

cooperation by contract); Process quality (clinical<br />

pathways/standard operation procedures (SOP); Hygiene<br />

plans, (MRSA management plan); Audit (active and passive);<br />

and Quality of performance (treatment results of 30<br />

consecutive patients).<br />

In Belgium, some opinion leaders together with Scientific<br />

Institute of Public Health, Epidemiology in Brussels<br />

developed an “Initiative for Quality of Care Promotion<br />

and Epidemiology in Belgian Diabetic foot clinics”, the socalled<br />

IQED centres. This prospective study is designed to<br />

describe, evaluate and improve the Quality of Care in the<br />

Belgian diabetic foot clinics (DFC) by collecting data and<br />

providing benchmarking. In this study Off­loading was<br />

used in 75% (variation from 42% to 100%) of the ulcer<br />

patients, but a total contact cast was only used in 2.4%.<br />

Of the patients with peripheral arterial disease, 42.8% underwent<br />

revascularization and 59.4% were hospitalized 19 .<br />

34<br />

6. GENERAL CONCLUSIONS AND THE<br />

CONCEPT OF INTERDISCIPLINARy TEAMS<br />

FOR INTEGRATED WOUND CARE<br />

In many countries and societies care facilities have come<br />

a long way in developing their wound care programs,<br />

especially where there is more effort towards an interdisciplinary<br />

approach. They have moved away from the<br />

approach of just having a single wound treatment nurse<br />

and established a more integrated care approach. The most<br />

successful teams are those that have a wound care team<br />

involving all key departments within the facility. In hospitals<br />

it starts with the medical director who facilitates<br />

the necessary patient medical work­ups as, for example, a<br />

therapy to apply specific services such as modalities and<br />

wound debridement, and dietary services to ensure that<br />

those with wounds have adequate nutritional intake. On<br />

the other hand, well skilled home nurses who provide<br />

primary patient care including wound dressings are also<br />

important key players. But in this advanced situation the<br />

key pitfall will be a good referral system and communication<br />

between the first, second and tertiary line teams.<br />

Ultimately, highly coordinated treatment plans are effective<br />

in reducing average wound healing times, thereby<br />

lessening patient suffering and costs of care.<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2


In this philosophy we must consider today integrating<br />

all the different “thematic” teams. Personally, I believe in<br />

an integration of teams specialized in wound care of diabetic<br />

foot ulcers, pressure ulcers, venous ulcers and others.<br />

This is already the case in some countries, such as the U.S.<br />

Finally, I would like to conclude that all worldwideknown<br />

diabetic foot clinics, the so called ‘Centres of<br />

Excellence’, were created one step at a time, beginning<br />

with the basic model. This paper has reported the experience<br />

of building one. This may be of use to those clinical<br />

personnel who are considering the effectiveness of their<br />

ways of working and the associated patient outcomes. We<br />

have reported improved patient outcomes following the<br />

implementation of this evidence­based model and would<br />

encourage others to consider employing this approach.<br />

‘A journey of a thousand miles begins with one step…’<br />

Lao Tzu, China, 6 th century m<br />

1. Joslin EP. The treatment of Diabetes Mellitus. Lea and Febiger: Philadelphia,<br />

PA, 2nd edn, 1917: 423-427; 4th edn, 1928: 785-802.<br />

2. Bernard J. Horak, PhD FACHE CPHQ; Joyce Pauig, RN; Ben Keidan, MD; Jennifer<br />

Kerns, MD. JHQ 141 - Patient Safety: A Case Study in Team Building and Interdisciplinary<br />

Collaboration. NAHQ, March/April 2004.<br />

3. Paul Gorman. “Managing multidisciplinary teams in the NHS”. 1989. ISBN 0 7494<br />

2787 6. Marston Lindsay Ross International Ltd, Oxfordshire.<br />

4. Jessup RL. Interdisciplinary versus multidisciplinary care teams: do we understand<br />

the difference? Australian Health review, August, 2007.<br />

5. Logan K RN. Diabetes-The role of the multidisciplinary team in patient self<br />

management. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2008. Diabetes Care. 2008.<br />

3 Suppl S12-S54.<br />

6. Multidisciplinary care. A model for achieving best practice cancer care.<br />

A Victorian Government Initiative. www.health.Vic.gov.au/cancer<br />

7. Fay D, BorrillC, Amir Z, et al. Getting the most out of multidisciplinary teams: a<br />

multi-sample study of team innovation in health care. Journal of occupational and<br />

Organizational Psychology, 2006<br />

8. Gorman P. Excellent information is needed for excellent care, but so is good<br />

communication. West j Med. 2000;172: 319-20.<br />

9. Jenkins VA, Fallowfield LJ, Poole K. Are members of multidisciplinary teams in breast<br />

cancer aware of each other’s informational roles? Quality in Health Care, 2001; 10:<br />

70-75.<br />

10. Nicolaas Schaper, William van Houtum, Andrew Boulton. Supplement: Proceedings<br />

of the 6th International Symposium on the Diabetic Foot, <strong>May</strong> 10–14, 2011,<br />

Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands.Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews,<br />

February <strong>2012</strong>,Volume 28, Issue Supplement S1, Pages 1–237<br />

11. Mike Edmonds . Improved survival of the diabetic foot: the role of a specialized foot<br />

clinic. Q J Med. 1986;232:763-771<br />

12. Lavery LA, Wunderlich RP, Tredwell JL. Disease management for the diabetic foot:<br />

effectiveness of a diabetic foot prevention program to reduce amputations and<br />

hospitalizations. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2005 Oct;70(1):31-7.<br />

13. Singhan K, Fiona N, Neil Baker, et al. Reduction in diabetic amputations over<br />

11 years in a defined U.K. population. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:99-101.<br />

14. Time to Act. Put feet first, prevent amputations: diabetes and foot care. Joint<br />

publication of the International Diabetes Federation and the International Working<br />

Group on the Diabetic Foot.2005<br />

15. Edmonds ME. The Diabetic Foot, 2003. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2004; 20 Suppl 1/<br />

S9-S12.<br />

16. Prompers L, Huijberts M, Apelqvist J, et al High prevalence of ischaemia, infection<br />

and serious comorbidity in patients with diabetic foot disease in Europe. Baseline<br />

results from the Eurodiale study. Diabetologia. 2007 Jan;50(1):18-25.<br />

17. Prompers L, Huijberts M, Apelqvist J, et al Optimal organization of health care in<br />

diabetic foot disease: introduction to the Eurodiale study. Int J Low Extrem Wounds.<br />

2007 Mar;6 (1):11-7.<br />

18. Prompers L, Huijberts M, Apelqvist J, et al. Delivery of care to diabetic patients with<br />

foot ulcers in daily practice: results of the Eurodiale Study, a prospective cohort<br />

study. Diabet Med. 2008 Jun;25(6):700-7.<br />

19. Billiet, A., Debacker, N., Beele, H., Daubresse, C., Deschamps, K., Deweer, S.,<br />

Lauwers, P., Matricali, G., Nobels, F., Randon, C., Wanyama, S. (2009). Resultaten.<br />

In: Billiet A., Debacker N., Nobels F., Van Acker K., Van Casteren V. (Eds.),<br />

IKED-voet Initiatief voor kwaliteitsbevordering en epidemiologie bij multidisciplinaire<br />

diabetes voetklinieken. (pp. 11-40). Brussels:Wetenschappelijk Instituut Volksgezondheid.<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2<br />

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy<br />

ATMOS S 042 NPWT *<br />

We counteract the barriers for you! –<br />

user friendly, self-explanatory, reliable<br />

ATMOS S 041 Wound<br />

Now the choice is yours –<br />

the combined talent from ATMOS for the small budget!<br />

ATMOS MedizinTechnik GmbH & Co. KG<br />

Ludwig-Kegel-Str. 12, 14-16, 18<br />

79853 Lenzkirch / Germany<br />

Tel: +49 7653 689-374 | Fax: +49 7653 68986-374<br />

ApplicationSolutions@atmosmed.de<br />

MedizinTechnik<br />

www.atmosmed.com<br />

*Currently not available in all countries


Science, Practice and Education<br />

Dr Jessica Walburn 1<br />

John Weinman 1<br />

Suzanne Scott 2<br />

Kavita Vedhara 3<br />

1 Institute of Psychiatry,<br />

Department of Psychology,<br />

King’s College London<br />

2 Dental Institute,<br />

Department of Dental<br />

Practice and Policy, King’s<br />

College London<br />

3 Institute of Work,<br />

Health and Organisations,<br />

University of Nottingham<br />

Correspondence:<br />

jessicawalburn@<br />

hotmail.com<br />

Conflict of interest: none<br />

36<br />

Exploring the characteristics of a venous<br />

leg ulcer that contribute to the emotional<br />

distress experienced by patients<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) are a common chronic<br />

wound whose prevalence increases with age. A<br />

number of studies across quantitative and qualitative<br />

literature have found that living with an<br />

ulcer can have a detrimental impact on healthrelated<br />

quality of life (HRQoL) and elicit emotional<br />

distress. Jones, Robinson, Barr & Carlisle,<br />

(2006) reported that anxiety and depression were<br />

positively associated with pain and malodour in<br />

a survey of 190 patients with VLUs. This study<br />

explored the negative emotions associated with<br />

living with an ulcer and investigated the factors<br />

that underpinned this distress.<br />

METHODS<br />

Design: A cross sectional design was used whereby<br />

a series of in­depth semi­structured interviews<br />

were conducted to explore distress, the lived experience<br />

of having an ulcer, coping strategies, patients’<br />

beliefs about their ulcer and its treatment,<br />

and the impact on HRQoL.<br />

Participants: This study had 14 participants being<br />

treated in primary care leg ulcer clinics (Edgware<br />

Community Hospital, Ravenscroft Medical Centre,<br />

Vale Drive Primary Care Centre, Forest Primary<br />

Care Centre) diagnosed with a VLU without<br />

type II diabetes and taking part in a prospective<br />

quantitative study investigating the determinants<br />

of healing. At the time of interview four participants<br />

had an open ulcer.<br />

Analysis: A thematic analysis of the interviews<br />

was conducted using Framework Analysis (Ritchie<br />

& Spencer, 1994). Framework analysis involves<br />

the organisation and interpretation of information<br />

using a matrix or chart (Ritchie, Spencer, &<br />

O’Connor, 2006). This approach was selected as<br />

it easily enables comparison across participants and<br />

themes. The quality and consistency of the analysis<br />

was assessed by two independent researchers.<br />

References<br />

Jones, J.E., Robinson, J., Barr, W. & Carlisle,<br />

C. (2008). Impact of exudate and odour from<br />

chronic venous leg ulceration. Nursing Standard,<br />

22(45), 53-4, 56, 58, 60-1.<br />

Ritchie, J. & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data<br />

analysis for applied policy research. In A. Bryman<br />

& P.G. Burgess (Eds.). Analysing Qualitative Data<br />

(pp.173-194). London: Routledge.<br />

Presented at<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> 2011<br />

Brussels · Belgium<br />

RESULTS<br />

All participants described experiencing distress<br />

associated with their ulcer. This was expressed<br />

in terms of feeling depressed, angry, anxious,<br />

ashamed and embarrassed. Dominant themes<br />

associated with distress included: symptomatology<br />

– pain, exudate and malodour; uncertainty<br />

related to ulcer duration and outcome; intrinsic<br />

revulsion at the appearance of the ulcer; dislike<br />

of the compression bandages used to treat the<br />

ulcer because of how they looked and how they<br />

limited general mobility and other activities; social<br />

impact of the ulcer relating to concerns about the<br />

reactions of others to the appearance and smell of<br />

the ulcer; strategies used to camouflage the compression<br />

bandage (e.g., always wearing trousers in<br />

warm weather) and manage the malodour (e.g.,<br />

avoidance of unnecessary contact with others);<br />

negative perceptions of the appearance of the ulcer<br />

scar; concern about ulcer recurrence.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

These findings highlight the range of negative<br />

emotions experienced by patients associated with<br />

having a VLU and are consistent with previous<br />

research. Although patients described a variety of<br />

factors related to their distress, appearance­related<br />

issues and concerns about the reactions of others<br />

were particularly significant. Quantitative research<br />

is now required to establish the prevalence of these<br />

concerns in a larger sample. In terms of improving<br />

patient well­being, this research highlights<br />

the variety of factors that could be contributing<br />

to emotional distress for patients living with a<br />

venous leg ulcer.<br />

Thank you to the patients and staff of Edgware<br />

Community Hospital, Ravenscroft Medical<br />

Centre, Vale Drive Primary Care Centre, Forest<br />

Primary Care Centre (Barnet and Enfield PCTs)<br />

for taking part and assisting with this research. m<br />

Ritchie, J., Spencer, L. & O’Connor, W. (2006).<br />

Carrying out Qualitative Analysis. In J. Ritchie &<br />

J. Lewis (Eds.). Qualitative Research Practice: A<br />

Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers<br />

(pp. 219-262). London: Sage Publication.<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2


Finally closed.<br />

sorbion – the future in modern wound care.<br />

<strong>May</strong> <strong>24</strong>, <strong>2012</strong> | 11:15 – 12:15 am | Room E1<br />

Health Economics –<br />

The key driver for decision making in wound care?<br />

Roy Lilley (Chair)<br />

Independent health policy analyst, writer, broadcaster<br />

and commentator, Surrey, United Kingdom<br />

Prof. Julian Guest<br />

Kings College London, United Kingdom<br />

Prof. Jan Apelqvist<br />

University Hospital of Malmö, Sweden<br />

Dr. Bernhard Lange-Asschenfeldt<br />

Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany<br />

Prof. Matthias Augustin<br />

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

Visit us at<br />

stand 33<br />

and xl16<br />

www.sorbion.com AG-BS-1671-03/12


Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers<br />

in a new light.<br />

Discover an innovative range<br />

of wound management, medical<br />

skin care and compression<br />

products which reliably cover<br />

all stages of wound healing.<br />

Especially developed for the<br />

Cutimed ®<br />

A D VA N C E D W O U N D C A R E<br />

successful treatment of chronic,<br />

difficult-to-heal-wounds, such<br />

as venous leg ulcers, our<br />

range offers a complete selection<br />

of effective and patientfriendly<br />

products.<br />

On request, we will provide you<br />

with further information on<br />

indications and treatment<br />

options. Contact us:<br />

www.cutimed.com<br />

Cutimed ® PROTECT Cutimed ® Sorbact ® Cutimed ® Siltec JOBST ® Comprifore JOBST ® UlcerCARE


Development of a wound healing<br />

index for chronic wounds<br />

SUMMARy<br />

Objectives: to systematically review the literature<br />

on healing measurement tools. To develop<br />

a scale for measuring progress towards healing for<br />

chronic wounds.<br />

Material and methods: the study was conducted<br />

in two phases:<br />

Phase 1: Systematic review in major databases<br />

of health sciences (MEDLINE, CINAHL,<br />

WIDEN, SCIELO, LILACS, COCHRANE,<br />

IME) from the start of the database until 2009.<br />

Search strategy: instrument, tool, ulcer, chronic<br />

wound, healing, assessment, validation, reliability,<br />

and the same in Spanish, with their corresponding<br />

formulations using Booleans AND, OR and truncation<br />

term for some of them. The search took<br />

place initially in the thesauri and if the word did<br />

not exist, in free text. Study design not was taken.<br />

GRADE system was used to quality appraisal.<br />

Phase 2: modified Delphi study with a group<br />

of experts in chronic wounds, to reach consensus<br />

on variables that could measure the dimension<br />

of “progress towards healing”. In the first round<br />

started with all variables of the wound and the<br />

patient found in the different instruments of the<br />

systematic review. In the second round sent the<br />

items that had obtained the highest score. Finally<br />

sent the final version and experts were asked to<br />

rate on a scale of 1 to 4 to obtain the content<br />

validity index (CVI). Those variables that had<br />

obtained more than 80% CVI were included.<br />

Results: the systematic review revealed a number<br />

of 8 healing tools as set out in 20 articles (10 articles<br />

about PUSH, 3 PSST, 1 DESIGN, 1 PWAT,<br />

1 Sessing Scale, 1 Scale Sussman, 1 WHS, COD­<br />

ED 1, and finally, a literature review to collect 4 of<br />

the above). Regardless of the number of items per<br />

scale, scale PSST has the best research on validity<br />

and reliability. However, most are for pressure ulcers.<br />

Only 4 papers studied validity and reliability<br />

of scales (PUSH, PSST, DESIGN and CODED).<br />

The only scale that has been validated for venous<br />

ulcers has also been the PUSH, in English and<br />

Portuguese. The only scale found in Spanish is<br />

coded, developed in the Basque Country in 2000,<br />

but only presents a partial survey. That is why they<br />

decided to develop a “de novo” scale for all types<br />

of chronic wounds.<br />

The scale developed, receives the provisional<br />

name of “RESVECH V1.0. Expected results of<br />

the assessment and evolution in the healing of<br />

chronic wounds”. CVI scores obtained by the<br />

experts above 80% on all items compose. Is<br />

defined, pending the study of validity and reliability,<br />

9 items: size of the lesion, depth/tissue<br />

concerned, edges, maceration, perilesional, tunneling,<br />

type of tissue in the wound bed, exudate,<br />

infection/inflammation, frequency of pain (in last<br />

10 days). The scale is scored numerically and can<br />

score ranging from 0 to 40 points, wound healed<br />

and the worst possible lesion respectively. Also<br />

accompanied by operational definitions of each<br />

item and its value­form.<br />

Conclusions: we get a scale with, a priori, content<br />

validity by expert’s assessment.<br />

Key words: Wound healing assessment, measurement<br />

tools, nursing, chronic wounds.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

From the beginning, medicine has always had two<br />

basic aims: relieving pain and healing wounds.<br />

Because of this, throughout the years the health<br />

sciences have little by little stimulated their ability<br />

to create new options for treatment and care 1 .<br />

Historically, wounds and strategies for healing<br />

them quickly have been linked to human progress,<br />

and this gave rise to an almost infinite range of<br />

treatment methods. It would be nearly impossible<br />

to mention the great number of products<br />

and agents put forward as beneficial for healing<br />

wounds, from the most ordinary to the most esoteric<br />

of substances thought to speed up the healing<br />

process. For example: gentian violet, scarlet<br />

red, Peruvian balm, cod liver oil and zinc sulfate,<br />

among many others 2 . Most of the times the ultimate<br />

goal was to prevent the occurrence of the<br />

much­feared infection. But when it did occur,<br />

fire was used to purify and cauterize wounds. The<br />

discovery of healing in a moist environment by<br />

�<br />

Science, Practice and Education<br />

Juan Carlos<br />

Restrepo-Medrano<br />

PhD, MSc Nurs, BSc Nurs<br />

Universidad de Antioquia.<br />

Medellín, Columbia<br />

José Verdú Soriano<br />

PhD, MSc Nurs, BSc Nurs,<br />

DUE -RN<br />

Universidad de Alicante.<br />

Alicante, Spain<br />

Correspondence:<br />

jcrm6@alu.ua.es<br />

This paper received the<br />

GNEAUPP-Convatec SL<br />

Sergio Juan Jordán<br />

Memorial Award for<br />

the best scientific paper<br />

presented at the 8th<br />

National Symposium on<br />

Pressure Ulcers and<br />

Chronic Wounds.<br />

Santiago de Compostela.<br />

November 2010.<br />

First published in<br />

GEROKOMOS 2011;<br />

Vol. 22, no 4<br />

Conflict of interest: none<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 39


Dr. Winter 3,4 was a revolution that led to a wide range of<br />

advanced products for healing purposes.<br />

Despite all the above and the breakthroughs in healthcare<br />

systems, diagnostic methods and the assessment<br />

and wound healing have not developed in the same way<br />

through time. Healing is a process that has not been properly<br />

approached in the case of wounds, especially chronic<br />

wounds (CW). These lesions have not generally been of<br />

interest to health­care professionals, who have always<br />

considered them to be normal and inevitable in certain<br />

conditions 5 , an attitude responsible for a certain kind of<br />

lethargy in carrying out studies and research in this field.<br />

Nonetheless, in recent years interest around these lesions<br />

has gradually grown, focusing not only on appropriate<br />

treatment but also on optimal preventive care 6 .<br />

CW require continuous, direct care to prevent them<br />

from occurring and/or healing them, which involves perseverance<br />

on the part of both direct and indirect caregivers.<br />

Adopting such an approach considerably increases<br />

the care burden and leads to remarkably higher direct and<br />

indirect costs in health­care services. The World Health<br />

Organization (WHO) considers the presence of some of<br />

these CW a measure of patient care quality 7 . Such is the<br />

case of pressure ulcers (PU), which are thought to show<br />

poor­quality patient care.<br />

Few tools have been developed to measure the progress of<br />

chronic wound healing, and these have generally focused<br />

on a specific type of wound: PU. Some of the tools proposed<br />

for assessing the healing process of PU are:<br />

– the PSST scale (Pressure Sore Status Tool) 8,9,10 ,<br />

– the PUSH scale (Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing) 11 ,<br />

– the Sussman scale (Sussman Wound Healing<br />

Tool) 12 ,<br />

– the Sessing scale 13 ,<br />

– the WHS scale (Wound Healing Scale) 14 ,<br />

– the PWAT scale (Photographic Wound Assessment<br />

Tool ) 15 ,<br />

– the CODED scale 16<br />

– the DESIGN scale 17 .<br />

Little research has been carried out with these tools, and<br />

the methods used have varied enormously, to the extent<br />

that it becomes difficult to establish their validity and<br />

reliability. Some are widely used, even for wounds they<br />

were not designed for, perhaps owing to the power of<br />

individuals or scientific groups who wanted to see them<br />

become a reality. Such is the case of PUSH, developed<br />

by the NPUAP.<br />

In practice therefore, clinicians are using these scales to<br />

assess changes in wounds, but evidence needs to be gathered<br />

to show that a scale has been validated and to make<br />

it possible not only to evaluate the process of CW healing<br />

40<br />

but also the effectiveness of our intervention. Given the<br />

foregoing, a reliable, valid tool would be needed to assess<br />

and describe the current status of the CW and determine<br />

whether it is progressing toward healing or worsening.<br />

OBJECTIVE<br />

n Systematic review of the literature on tools for measuring<br />

healing to determine whether there is a valid,<br />

reliable index or scale for all types of CW.<br />

n Adapting and/or developing a scale to measure the<br />

healing process of all types of CW.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHOD<br />

This study was carried out in two phases:<br />

Phase 1: This stage involved a systematic review of publications<br />

in the scientific literature that deal with the subject<br />

of scales and/or tools for measuring wound healing. The<br />

most relevant health and social science databases were<br />

used: MEDLINE (PubMed), CINHAL, Web of Science,<br />

LILACS, Sociological Abstracts, CUIDEN, EMBASE,<br />

PsycInfo and ISI Web of Knowledge. The words included<br />

in the search strategy were: instrument, tool, ulcer, chronic<br />

wound, healing, assessment, validation, reliability, and their<br />

equivalents in Spanish, using Boolean AND, OR operators<br />

and the truncation term for some of them. In order<br />

to find articles more precisely, the initial search for a term<br />

was conducted in database thesauri and, when this was not<br />

possible, it was used as free text. The search was limited<br />

to paper titles and abstracts. The search period went from<br />

the start of each database up to December 2009.<br />

The inclusion criteria for selecting articles required that the<br />

development or analysis of a wound healing tool and/or<br />

scale be included in the objectives or hypothesis (the study<br />

design was not taken into account for inclusion). The<br />

exclusion criteria were: articles with no abstract available,<br />

editorials, papers presented at conferences, book reviews<br />

and animal studies.<br />

Articles were initially selected by pertinence of the title<br />

and abstract. The full text of articles chosen in this manner<br />

was analyzed to decide whether they should be included<br />

in the review. The GRADE system was used to evaluate<br />

the quality of publications. Information of interest for<br />

the study was extracted by means of an ad hoc chart that<br />

collected information on the general characteristics of the<br />

studies, the scale analyzed and the main results.<br />

Phase 2: After completing the systematic review and establishing<br />

the scales found in the literature, it was decided<br />

whether it would be feasible to adapt a tool to make it valid<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2


and reliable for all CW or whether it would be better to<br />

develop a de novo tool.<br />

If it were decided to adapt a scale or tool already developed,<br />

the method of translation/back­translation of the<br />

tool would be used and subsequently its cultural adaptation<br />

to the Spanish language.<br />

In the case of developing a de novo index, the prior studies<br />

found would be taken into account to define the variables<br />

that could describe CW healing. This first draft of the<br />

index would undergo a content validity process involving<br />

a consensus of experts using a modified Delphi method.<br />

A group of 10 CW experts would evaluate the questionnaire<br />

to determine whether the tool would respond to the<br />

construct of “progress toward healing”.<br />

A modified two­round Delphi method was used to<br />

obtain the value of the content validity index (CVI). The<br />

experts scored the list of items twice, first the initial version<br />

of 12 items and then a final version with the items<br />

included and their rating categories. This method ensures<br />

that the scores will be based on the judgment of each<br />

expert and not be influenced by external factors, such as<br />

power relations, personal sympathies, desire to please or<br />

not to feel in a minority, for example. This is achieved by<br />

scoring the items in two rounds.<br />

The content validity was determined by a panel of experts<br />

as described by Polit and Hungler 18 based on two criteria:<br />

pertinence, i.e., the item evaluates what it purports to<br />

evaluate; and relevance, defined as the item’s significance<br />

in evaluating healing. The following scale was used:<br />

n Pertinence: 1) not pertinent 2) somewhat pertinent,<br />

3) pertinent, 4) very pertinent<br />

n Relevance: 1) not relevant, 2) somewhat relevant,<br />

3) relevant, 4) very relevant.<br />

Three calculations are made to determine content validity<br />

with this method:<br />

n Content validity index for each item in the tool<br />

(CVI­i), calculated with the following formula:<br />

Number of experts agreeing on the value of<br />

relevance or pertinence of each item<br />

(values between 3 and 4)<br />

Total number of experts<br />

n Content validity index for each expert (CVI­e),<br />

by the following formula:<br />

Number of items scored between<br />

3 and 4 by an expert<br />

Total number of items<br />

n General content validity index for the tool<br />

(CVI­total):<br />

Sum of all experts’ individual CVI<br />

Number of experts<br />

A CVI of 0.80 or higher in any of the three above areas<br />

was considered indicative of high content validity 18 , and<br />

the minimum value required would be 0.62 according to<br />

Lawshe 19 for a panel of 10 experts.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Phase 1<br />

The article search and selection process is summarized in<br />

Figure 1. Eight wound healing scales were identified in the<br />

20 articles included in the review (10 articles on PUSH,<br />

three on PSST, one on DESIGN, one on PWAT, one<br />

on the Sessing Scale, one on the Sussman Scale, one on<br />

WHS, one on CODED and, finally, a literature review<br />

that included four of the above).<br />

The main characteristics of the scales found were: PSST<br />

which evaluates 13 wound categories 8,9,10 ; the PUSH tool<br />

developed by the NPUAP that combines only three wound<br />

categories 11 ; the Sussman Wound Healing Tool 12 , a scale<br />

of 10 dichotomous categories; the Sessing Scale which<br />

is a modified classification system with six categories 13 ;<br />

Articles with no abstract<br />

available:<br />

6<br />

Articles identified:<br />

59<br />

Articles included<br />

in the study:<br />

20<br />

Editorials,<br />

conference papers,<br />

book reviews,<br />

different languages:<br />

6<br />

Articles on scales<br />

other than healing:<br />

23 Articles aimed<br />

at animal wounds:<br />

4<br />

Repeated articles:<br />

3<br />

Total articles excluded:<br />

39<br />

Fig. 1. Literature review process. Articles included and excluded.<br />

Science, Practice and Education<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 41<br />


<strong>EWMA</strong> DOCUMENTS<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Documents on Debridement and Antimicrobials<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> are producing two documents in <strong>2012</strong>:<br />

The <strong>EWMA</strong> Document on Antimicrobials aims to meet<br />

the on-going discussion across Europe concerning the<br />

consequences of a biological mutation of infections<br />

and the subsequent potential resistance to current<br />

wound treatment. The document will describe the<br />

related aspects of antiseptic, antibiotic treatment and<br />

other relevant treatment methods.<br />

In <strong>May</strong> 2010 the following <strong>EWMA</strong> Document was published:<br />

Outcomes in controlled and comparative studies on<br />

non healing wounds<br />

– Recommendations to improve quality of evidence<br />

in wound management<br />

The document is written by members of the <strong>EWMA</strong> Patient<br />

Outcome Group, based on common discussions in the group.<br />

The document has been summaried in a pixi version.<br />

In <strong>2012</strong>-2013 the Patient Outcome Group is working<br />

on a set of clinical study guidelines on non healing<br />

wounds. With these guidelines the group aims to<br />

support the recommendations included in the 2010<br />

POG document on evidence and outcomes.<br />

The guidelines will include a checklist with relevant<br />

research questions, frequent mistakes and links to<br />

other relevant sources of information.<br />

Other <strong>EWMA</strong> documents e.g. Position Documents<br />

can be downloaded from www.ewma.org<br />

The <strong>EWMA</strong> document on Debridement aim<br />

to provide an updated overview of the various<br />

debridement options. It will offer a clarification<br />

of the principal role of debridement and define<br />

the possibilities and limitations for standard<br />

and new debridement options.<br />

Outcomes in controlled<br />

and comparative studies<br />

on non-healing wounds<br />

Recommendations to improve the quality<br />

of evidence in wound management<br />

A <strong>EWMA</strong> Patient Outcome Group Document<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> front cover.indd 5 20/5/10 13:14:26<br />

For further details contact:<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Secretariat,<br />

Nordre Fasanvej 113,<br />

2000 Frederiksberg,<br />

Denmark<br />

Tel: +45 7020 0305<br />

Fax: +45 7020 0315<br />

ewma@ewma.org


the Wound Healing Scale, combining the four classification<br />

stages with eight modifiers 14 . The only scale found in<br />

Spanish was CODED, developed in the Basque Country<br />

in 2000, but only a partial study was found 16 . The most recent<br />

is the DESIGN scale, consisting of seven categories 17 .<br />

The PUSH tool is the most commonly used by clinicians,<br />

although the PSST is the one appearing most often in<br />

studies of its measurement properties and application in<br />

clinical practice which accredit its quality 8,9,10,11 , but its<br />

complexity in clinical use is evidenced by practitioners<br />

themselves.<br />

Table 1. Content validity of each item<br />

Item Content validity<br />

1. Wound size 1<br />

2. Depth/tissues involved 0.90<br />

3. Edges 0.80<br />

4. Perilesional maceration 0.80<br />

5. Tunneling 0.90<br />

6. Type of tissue in the wound bed 0.90<br />

7. Exudate 1<br />

8. Infection/inflammation (biofilm signs) 0.90<br />

9. Incidence of pain 0.90<br />

The PUSH tool, in contrast to PSST, is a much quicker,<br />

more reliable scale to monitor the status and progress of<br />

wounds through time, but the procedures used in developing<br />

it are not clear in the literature. Even so, it has been<br />

commonly used in the USA since it first appeared.<br />

In Spain the GNEAUPP translated this tool into Spanish<br />

and adopted it 20 after authorization by the NPUAP,<br />

but no studies on the adaptation, validity and reliability<br />

of this tool have yet been carried out in Spain. The DE­<br />

SIGN scale is the most recent tool for assessing the healing<br />

process, but there is only one published study that looks<br />

at its validity and reliability 17 , involving inter­observer<br />

reliability and in comparison with PSST to determine<br />

its validity. Although the reliability and validity of this<br />

tool are highly rated, the authors themselves point out<br />

the need for more studies on the scale in other contexts<br />

and other types of wounds. So far there is no record of<br />

any such studies.<br />

Regardless of the number of articles per scale, PSST is the<br />

one with the best research on validity and reliability. Nevertheless,<br />

most are measurement tools exclusively for PU.<br />

Validity and reliability studies have been carried out for<br />

only four scales (PUSH, PSST, DESIGN and CODED).<br />

The only scale validated also for venous ulcers is PUSH,<br />

in English and Portuguese 11,21 , which leads to the conclusion<br />

that there is no scale suitable for the reliable, valid<br />

assessment of healing in all CW.<br />

Phase 2<br />

It was decided to develop a healing progress index. Therefore,<br />

the systematic review was used also to determine what<br />

items should be included in developing the new scale.<br />

Existing scales were reviewed and some of their items were<br />

included in the initial drafts. This resulted in a lengthy list<br />

of items related to the healing process, and it was decided<br />

that the new scale should include only those items that<br />

would potentially change throughout the healing process.<br />

The outcome was a pencil­and­paper tool consisting of<br />

12 variables: size/area/dimension, depth/tissues involved,<br />

edges, perilesional area, tunneling, wound history, baseline<br />

conditions, type and amount of tissue, exudate, infection/<br />

inflammation (biofilm signs), treatment and pain. As mentioned<br />

in the section on Material and Method, the experts<br />

scored the item list twice, first in the initial 12­item version<br />

and then in a final version with 9 items and their rating<br />

categories. The CVI­i results are summarized in Table 1.<br />

The CVI­e results demonstrated high content validity<br />

for the most part, with scores of 0.80 or higher; some<br />

even received the maximum CVI score (Table 2). The<br />

CVI­total score was above 0.90, which indicates that the<br />

questionnaire items measure a specific domain, based on<br />

the scientific literature related to the evaluation of CW<br />

healing, guaranteeing the general content validity. The<br />

final outcome based on the foregoing and the CVI with<br />

scores above 0.80 given by the experts for all the items<br />

making up the de novo scale for all types of CW, was an<br />

index with the provisional name of “RESVECH V1.0. Results<br />

expected from the assessment and healing progress of<br />

chronic wounds”, pending a study of validity and reliability<br />

(Annex 1). It contains nine items: wound dimensions,<br />

depth/tissues involved, edges, perilesional maceration,<br />

tunneling, type of tissue in the wound bed, exudate, infection/inflammation<br />

(biofilm signs), pain frequency (in the<br />

past 10 days). The scale is scored numerically between 0<br />

Table 2. Individual validity index for each expert (CVI-e)<br />

Expert panelist<br />

Number of items<br />

scored between<br />

3 and 4<br />

Content validity<br />

CVI-3 (according to<br />

formula)<br />

Expert 1 8 0.80<br />

Expert 2 8 0.80<br />

Expert 3 8 0.80<br />

Expert 4 9 1<br />

Expert 5 8 0.80<br />

Expert 6 8 0.80<br />

Expert 7 8 0.80<br />

Expert 8 8 0.80<br />

Expert 9 9 1<br />

Expert 10 9 1<br />

Science, Practice and Education<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 43<br />


Science, Practice and Education<br />

(wound healed) and 40 points (worst possible condition).<br />

Additionally, operational definitions are provided for each<br />

item, as well as the way of assessing them (Annex 1).<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

The systematic review confirmed that there is little research<br />

on multidimensional tools for measuring healing<br />

and more research is needed.<br />

The RESVECH 1.0 index showed face value for the<br />

clarity and ease of understanding of each item by the experts<br />

who took part in the study. The overall content validity<br />

index (CVI­total) was 0.98, greater than the required<br />

minimum of 0.62 according to Lawshe for a panel of ten<br />

experts, which ensures the content validity according to<br />

the scientific literature relative to items for assessing the<br />

healing process.<br />

The validation process evidenced that this is a short<br />

scale, and it is pending further analysis according to experts<br />

and study population, comparing it with a disciplinary<br />

theory.<br />

The index entitled “RESVECH V1.0. Results expected<br />

from the assessment and healing progress of chronic<br />

wounds” is the first measurement tool applicable to chronic<br />

wounds of all types and of any etiology that can be used<br />

from the time the chronic wound is detected until healing<br />

process is complete. It may undergo different types of validation<br />

procedures to determine whether it measures what<br />

it purports to measure, which emphasizes the significance<br />

of continuing the improvement process.<br />

In general, it can be concluded that the quantitative analysis<br />

of the questionnaire shows that its content is valid both<br />

in terms of pertinence and relevance.<br />

BIBLIOGRAPHy<br />

1. Calderón W. Historia de la cirugía plástica mundial.<br />

Cirugía Plástica. Santiago. Sociedad de Cirujanos de<br />

Chile 2001; 19-27.<br />

2. Ladin D. Understanding wound dressings. Cl Plast<br />

Surg 1998; 25: 433-41.<br />

3. Winter GD. Formation of the Scab and the rate of<br />

epithelisation of superficial wounds in the skin of the<br />

young domestic pig. Nature 1962; 293 (4812):<br />

293-4.<br />

4. Winter GD, Scales JT. Effect of air drying and<br />

dressings on the surface of a wound. Nature 1963;<br />

197 (4862): 91-2.<br />

5. Grupo de Trabajo sobre Úlceras Vasculares de la<br />

AEEV. Consenso sobre Úlceras Vasculares y Pie<br />

Diabético de la AEEV. Guía de Práctica Clínica.<br />

Marzo 2004.<br />

6. Grupo Nacional para el Estudio y Asesoramiento en<br />

Úlceras por Presión y Heridas Crónicas. Mesa de<br />

debate: “Las úlceras por presión, un reto para el<br />

sistema de salud y la sociedad. Repercusiones a nivel<br />

epidemiológico, ético, económico y legal”. Madrid.<br />

Barcelona. Logroño: GNEAUPP, 2003.<br />

7. Gutiérrez FF. Prevenir las úlceras por presión es<br />

garantizar la calidad asistencial. Enfermería Científica<br />

1993; 140: 7-10.<br />

8. Bates-Jensen B. New pressure ulcer status tool.<br />

Decubitus 1990; 3 (3): 14-5.<br />

44<br />

9. Bates-Jensen BM, Vredevoe DL, Brecht ML. Validity<br />

and reliability of the Pressure Sore Status Tool.<br />

Decubitus 1992; 5 (6): 20-8.<br />

10. Bates-Jensen BM. The pressure sore status tool: an<br />

outcome measure for pressure sores. Top Geriatric<br />

Rehabil 1994; 9 (4): 17-34.<br />

11. Thomas DR, Rodeheaver GT, Bartolucci AA, Franz<br />

RA, Sussman C, Ferrell BA, Cuddigan J, Stotts NA,<br />

Maklebust J. Pressure ulcer scale for healing:<br />

derivation and validation of the PUSH tool. The<br />

PUSH Task Force. Adv Wound Care 1997; 10 (5):<br />

96-101.<br />

12. Utility of the Sussman Wound Healing Tool in<br />

predicting wound healing outcomes in physical<br />

therapy. Adv Wound Care 1997; 10 (5): 74-7.<br />

13. Ferrell BA, Artinian BM, Sessing D. The Sessing Scale<br />

for assessment of pressure ulcer healing. Journal of<br />

the American Geriatric Society 1995; 43: 37-40.<br />

14. Krasner D. Wound Healing Scale, version 1.0: A<br />

proposal. Adv Wound Care 1997; 10 (5): 82-5.<br />

15. Houghton PE, Kincaid CB, Campbell KE, Woodbury<br />

MG, Keast DH. Photographic assessment of the<br />

appearance of chronic pressure and leg ulcers.<br />

Ostomy/Wound Manage 2000; 46 (4): 20-30.<br />

16. Emparanza JL, Aranegui P, Ruiz M y cols. A simple<br />

Severity index for pressure ulcers. Journal of Wound<br />

Care 2000: 9 (2): 86-90.<br />

RESVECH SCALE V1.0 (SEE ANNEx 1.)<br />

Scale of results from assessment and<br />

progress of wound healing<br />

Operational definitions of variables and<br />

instructions for use<br />

Below is a clear, systematic explanation of the items<br />

making up the scale and the correct way to respond<br />

to them according to your patient’s wound.<br />

Indicate the score for each item in the box corresponding<br />

to the time of measurement<br />

(e.g., Measurement 0, Date ___________).<br />

1. Ulcer dimensions<br />

1.1. Dimensions: Indicate the measurements as<br />

length x width, as follows:<br />

n Length: Cephalocaudal measurement<br />

(from head to feet)<br />

n Width: Perpendicular to length<br />

Express both measurements in cm. Then multiply<br />

length x width to obtain the area in cm 2 .<br />

Length<br />

Width<br />

Assign a score from 0 to 6 according to the area. For<br />

example, an area of de 44 cm 2 would be scored as 4.<br />

17. Sanada H, Moriguchi T, Miyachi Y, Ohura T, Nakajo<br />

T, Tokunaga K, Fukui M, Sugama J, Kitagawa A.<br />

Reliability and validity of DESIGN, a tool that<br />

classifies pressure ulcer severity and monitors<br />

healing. J Wound Care 2004; 13 (1): 13-18.<br />

18. Polit DF, Hungler BP. Investigación científica en<br />

Ciencias de la Salud: principios y métodos. 6ª. ed.<br />

México: McGraw-Hill Interamericana, 2000, pp.<br />

398-401.<br />

19. Lawshe CH. Quantitative approach to content<br />

validity. Personnel Psychology 1975; 28: 568.<br />

20. Grupo Nacional para el Estudio y Asesoramiento en<br />

Úlceras por Presión y Heridas Crónicas (GNEAUPP).<br />

Instrumentos para la monitorización de la evolución<br />

de una úlcera por presión (Documento VII.<br />

GNEAUPP). En: Documentos GNEAUPP.<br />

21. Santos VLCG, Sellmer D, Massulo MME. Transcultural<br />

adaptation of the Pressure Ulcer Scale for<br />

Healing (PUSH) to the Portuguese language, in<br />

patients with chronic leg ulcers. Programme and<br />

Abstract Book of the 15th Biennial Congress of the<br />

World Council of Enterostomal Therapists 2004; (5):<br />

16-19.<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2


ANNEx 1. RESVECH SCALE V1.0<br />

Items Measurement and dates:<br />

0 1 2 3<br />

1. Wound dimensions:<br />

0. Area = 0 cm2 1. Area < 4 cm2 2. Area = 4 - < 16 cm2 3. Area = 16 - < 36 cm2 4. Area = 36 - < 64 cm2 5. Area = 64 - < 100 cm2 6. Area ≥ 100 cm2 2. Depth/tissues involved:<br />

0. Intact skin healed<br />

1. Dermis-epidermis involved<br />

2. Subcutaneous tissue involved<br />

(adipose tissue not reaching the muscle fascia)<br />

3. Muscle involved<br />

4. Bone and/or attached tissues involved (tendons,<br />

ligaments, joint capsule or black scab blocking<br />

view of the tissues underneath)<br />

3. Edges:<br />

0. Not distinguishable (no wound edges)<br />

1. Diffuse<br />

2. Delimited<br />

3. Damaged<br />

4. Thickened (“aged”, “everted”)<br />

4. Perilesional maceration:<br />

0. No<br />

1. Yes<br />

5. Tunneling:<br />

0. No<br />

1. Yes<br />

6. Type of tissue in the wound bed:<br />

4. Necrotic (dry or moist black scab)<br />

3. Necrotic tissue and/or slough in the bed<br />

2. Granulation tissue<br />

1. Epithelial tissue<br />

0. Closed/healed<br />

7. Exudate:<br />

3. Dry<br />

0. Moist<br />

1. Wet<br />

2. Saturated<br />

3. Leaking exudate<br />

8. Infection/inflammation (biofilm signs):<br />

8.1. Increasingly painful Yes = 1 No = 0<br />

8.2. Erythema around the wound Yes = 1 No = 0<br />

8.3. Edema around the wound Yes = 1 No = 0<br />

8.4. Rising temperature Yes = 1 No = 0<br />

8.5. Increasing exudate Yes = 1 No = 0<br />

8.6. Purulent exudate Yes = 1 No = 0<br />

8.7. Tissue is friable or bleeds easily Yes = 1 No = 0<br />

8.8. Wound stationary, no progress Yes = 1 No = 0<br />

8.9. Tissue compatible with biofilm Yes = 1 No = 0<br />

8.10. Odor Yes = 1 No = 0<br />

8.11. Hypergranulation Yes = 1 No = 0<br />

8.12. Wound increasingly larger Yes = 1 No = 0<br />

8.13. Satellite lesions Yes = 1 No = 0<br />

8.14. Pale tissue Yes = 1 No = 0<br />

ADD UP THE SCORES OF ALL SUB-ITEMS!<br />

9. Frequency of pain (in past 10 days):<br />

0. Never<br />

1. When changing dressing<br />

2. Often<br />

3. All the time<br />

TOTAL SCORE (Max. = 40, Min. = 0)<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2<br />

�<br />

Management of<br />

the Diabetic Foot<br />

Theory & Practice<br />

4 Day Course, 8 - 11 October <strong>2012</strong><br />

Pisa, Italy<br />

This 4 day theoretical course & practical<br />

training gives participants a thorough introduction<br />

to all aspects of diagnosis, management<br />

and treatment of the diabetic foot.<br />

Lectures will be combined with practical<br />

sessions held in the afternoon at the diabetic<br />

foot clinic at the Pisa University Hospital.<br />

Lectures will be in agreement with the<br />

International Consensus on the Diabetic Foot<br />

& Practical Guideline on the Management<br />

and Prevention on the Diabetic Foot.<br />

· COURSE ENDORSED BY ·<br />

EUROPEAN · WOUND · MANAGEMENT· ASSOCI<br />

ATION<br />

This course is endorsed by <strong>EWMA</strong>.<br />

www.diabeticfootcourses.org


Science, Practice and Education<br />

2. Depth/tissues involved: State the score for the greatest<br />

involvement.<br />

3. Edges: The edges are understood as the tissue bordering<br />

the wound bed. Indicate the score that best defines the<br />

edges of your wound:<br />

• Not distinguishable: No borders seen, which may be<br />

the case of a wound that is in the process of healing.<br />

• Diffuse: It is difficult to distinguish them.<br />

• Delimited: Clearly visible edges distinguishable from<br />

the bed. Not thickened.<br />

• Damaged: Well outlined edges, not thickened, that<br />

may show maceration, lesions, etc.<br />

• Thickened, aged or everted: Well outlined edges but<br />

thickened or turned in towards the bed.<br />

4. Perilesional maceration: Perilesional maceration is<br />

defined as softening in the area between the edge and<br />

outward from the wound (toward healthy skin). Indicate<br />

5. Tunneling: Sinuous paths in the wound. Indicate<br />

whether or not these are found in the wound.<br />

6. Type of tissue in the wound bed: This refers to the<br />

type of tissue present in the wound bed. Mark the worst<br />

tissue found with an “x”, according to the following scale<br />

from lesser to greater: necrotic­slough­granulation tissueepithelial<br />

tissue­closed­healed.<br />

6.1. Necrotic: This refers to devitalized, black or<br />

brown tissue firmly adhered to the wound bed or<br />

its edges, which may be harder or softer than the<br />

surrounding tissue (skin); dry black scab.<br />

6.2. Slough: Yellow or whitish tissue adhering to the<br />

wound bed in the form of strands, filaments or<br />

thin layers. It falls apart or is very difficult to remove<br />

with pincers.<br />

6.3. Granulation tissue: Pink or shiny, moist and<br />

granular tissue.<br />

6.4. Epithelial tissue: In ulcers or superficial wounds;<br />

new pink tissue or shiny skin growing from the<br />

edges or in islands around the ulcer/wound.<br />

6.5. Closed/healing: The wound is completely covered<br />

with epithelium (new skin).<br />

7. Exudate: This is assessed when changing the dressing,<br />

which may be:<br />

7.1. Moist: Small amounts of fluid are visible when<br />

removing the dressing; the primary dressing may<br />

have slight spotting; the frequency of changing<br />

the dressing is appropriate for the type of dressing.<br />

Note: This is often the objective in the treatment<br />

of exudate.<br />

46<br />

7.2. Dry: The wound bed is dry; there is no visible<br />

moisture and the primary dressing is not stained;<br />

the dressing may be stuck to the wound. Note:<br />

This may be the environment of choice for<br />

ischemic wounds.<br />

7.3. Wet: Small amounts of fluid are visible when<br />

the dressing is removed; the primary dressing is<br />

very stained but there is no exudate flowing; the<br />

frequency of changing the dressing is appropriate<br />

for the type of dressing.<br />

7.4. Saturated: The primary dressing is wet and exudate<br />

is leaking through it; the dressing needs to<br />

be changed more often than usual for this type of<br />

dressing; perilesional skin may be macerated.<br />

7.5. Leaking exudate: The dressing is saturated and<br />

exudate is leaking from the primary and secondary<br />

dressings toward clothing or further; the dressing<br />

needs to be changed much more often than usual<br />

for this type of dressing.<br />

8. Infection/inflammation: Indicate if more than three or<br />

four of the following signs or symptoms of inflammation<br />

are present:<br />

8.1. Increasing pain<br />

8.2. Perilesional erythema<br />

8.3. Perilesional edema<br />

8.4. Rising temperature<br />

8.5. Increasing exudate<br />

8.6. Purulent exudate<br />

8.7. Tissue that is friable or bleeds easily<br />

8.8. Stationary wound that does not progress<br />

8.9. Tissue compatible with biofilm<br />

8.10. Odor<br />

8.11. Hypergranulation<br />

8.12. Increasing size of the wound<br />

8.13. Satellite lesions<br />

8.14. Pale tissue<br />

9. Pain: In the wound area, divided in two<br />

Frequency:<br />

9.1. Never<br />

9.2. When changing the dressing<br />

9.3. Often<br />

9.4. All the time<br />

Intensity: Mark intensity on the VAS scale, according to<br />

the following criteria:<br />

0 = No pain, and 10 = Greatest possible pain<br />

m<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2


iabetic<br />

lcer<br />

non healing for 8 weeks<br />

68 years<br />

despair of wound deterioration<br />

Activates healing naturally<br />

Hyaluronic Acid & Iodine<br />

Promotes granulation<br />

Provides antimicrobial protection<br />

Highly effective in diabetic ulcers*<br />

49 % wounds completely healed<br />

19 % wounds significantly improved<br />

www.hyiodine.com<br />

no social life<br />

*SOBOTKA, L et al. Complex approach to the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.<br />

presented at <strong>EWMA</strong> 2006, <strong>May</strong> 19-20, Prague,<br />

no walks with<br />

grandchildren


ABSTRACTS OF RECENT<br />

COCHRANE REVIEWS<br />

Publication in The Cochrane Library Issue 2, <strong>2012</strong><br />

Aloe vera for treating acute and<br />

chronic wounds<br />

Anthony D Dat, Flora Poon, Kim BT Pham,<br />

Jenny Doust<br />

Citation example: Dat AD, Poon F, Pham KBT, Doust<br />

J. Aloe vera for treating acute and chronic wounds.<br />

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010,<br />

Issue 10. Art. No.: CD008762.<br />

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008762.<br />

Copyright © <strong>2012</strong> The Cochrane Collaboration. Published<br />

by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Background: Aloe vera is a cactus-like perennial succulent<br />

belonging to the Liliaceae Family that is commonly<br />

grown in tropical climates. Animal studies have suggested<br />

that Aloe vera may help accelerate the wound<br />

healing process.<br />

Objectives: To determine the effects of Aloe veraderived<br />

products (for example dressings and topical<br />

gels) on the healing of acute wounds (for example<br />

lacerations, surgical incisions and burns) and chronic<br />

wounds (for example infected wounds, arterial and<br />

venous ulcers).<br />

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Wounds<br />

Group Specialised Register (9 September 2011), the<br />

Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CEN-<br />

TRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 3), Ovid<br />

MEDLINE (2005 to August Week 5 2011), Ovid<br />

MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations<br />

8 September 2011), Ovid EMBASE (2007 to 2010<br />

Week 35), Ovid AMED (1985 to September 2011) and<br />

EBSCO CINAHL (1982 to 9 September 2011).<br />

We did not apply date or language restrictions.<br />

Selection criteria: We included all randomised controlled<br />

trials that evaluated the effectiveness of Aloe vera,<br />

aloe-derived products and a combination of Aloe vera<br />

and other dressings as a treatment for acute or chronic<br />

wounds. There was no restriction in terms of source,<br />

date of publication or language. An objective measure<br />

of wound healing (either proportion of completely<br />

healed wounds or time to complete healing) was the<br />

primary endpoint.<br />

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently<br />

carried out trial selection, data extraction<br />

and risk of bias assessment, checked by a third review<br />

author.<br />

Main results: Seven trials were eligible for inclusion,<br />

comprising a total of 347 participants. Five trials in<br />

people with acute wounds evaluated the effects of Aloe<br />

vera on burns, haemorrhoidectomy patients and skin<br />

biopsies. Aloe vera mucilage did not increase burn<br />

healing compared with silver sulfadiazine (risk ratio<br />

(RR) 1.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70 to 2.85).<br />

A reduction in healing time with Aloe vera was noted<br />

after haemorrhoidectomy (RR 16.33 days, 95% CI<br />

3.46 to 77.15) and there was no difference in the proportion<br />

of patients completely healed at follow up after<br />

skin biopsies. In people with chronic wounds, one trial<br />

found no statistically significant difference in pressure<br />

ulcer healing with Aloe vera (RR 0.10, 95% CI -1.59 to<br />

1.79) and in a trial of surgical wounds healing by secondary<br />

intention Aloe vera significantly delayed healing<br />

(mean difference 30 days, 95% CI 7.59 to 52.41).<br />

Clinical heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. The<br />

poor quality of the included trials indicates that the trial<br />

results must be viewed with extreme caution as they<br />

have a high risk of bias.<br />

Authors’ conclusions: There is currently an absence of<br />

high quality clinical trial evidence to support the use of<br />

Aloe vera topical agents or Aloe vera dressings as<br />

treatments for acute and chronic wounds.<br />

Plain language summary: Aloe vera for treating acute<br />

and chronic wounds<br />

Aloe vera is a cactus-like, succulent plant which grows<br />

in tropical climates. Aloe vera is widely used in a variety<br />

of cosmetics including creams and toiletries. Some<br />

studies conducted in animals have suggested that Aloe<br />

vera may help wound healing. Aloe vera can be<br />

applied topically as a cream or gel, or can be impregnated<br />

into a dressing and applied to the wound.<br />

The authors of this Cochrane Review wanted to find<br />

evidence on whether Aloe vera encourages wound<br />

healing in people with acute wounds (for example<br />

lacerations, surgical incisions and burns) and chronic<br />

wounds (for example infected wounds, arterial and<br />

venous ulcers). The review found that there was not<br />

enough research evidence to answer this question.<br />

�<br />

Cochrane Reviews<br />

Sally Bell-Syer, MSc<br />

Managing Editor<br />

Cochrane Wounds Group<br />

Department of<br />

Health Sciences<br />

University of York<br />

United Kingdom<br />

sembs1@york.ac.uk<br />

Conflict of interest: none<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 49


Hydrocolloid dressings for<br />

healing diabetic foot ulcers<br />

Jo C Dumville, Sohan Deshpande, Susan O’Meara, Katharine<br />

Speak<br />

Citation example: Dumville JC, Deshpande S, O’Meara S, Speak<br />

K. Hydrocolloid dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers.<br />

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011,<br />

Issue 5 . Art. No.: CD009099.<br />

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009099.<br />

Copyright © <strong>2012</strong> The Cochrane Collaboration.<br />

Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Background: Foot ulcers in people with diabetes are a prevalent<br />

and serious global health issue. Wound dressings are regarded<br />

as important components of ulcer treatment, with clinicians and<br />

patients having many different types to choose from including<br />

hydrocolloid dressings. There is a range of different hydrocolloids<br />

available including fibrous-hydrocolloid and hydrocolloid<br />

(matrix) dressings. A clear and current overview of current evidence<br />

is required to facilitate decision-making regarding dressing<br />

use.<br />

Objectives: To compare the effects of hydrocolloid wound dressings<br />

with no dressing or alternative dressings on the healing of<br />

foot ulcers in people with diabetes.<br />

Search methods: We searched The Cochrane Wounds Group<br />

Specialised Register (searched 4 January <strong>2012</strong>); The Cochrane<br />

Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane<br />

Library 2011, Issue 4); Ovid MEDLINE (1950 to December<br />

Week 3 2011); Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-<br />

Indexed Citations, January 03, <strong>2012</strong>); Ovid EMBASE (1980 to<br />

2011 Week 52); and EBSCO CINAHL (1982 to 30 December<br />

2011). There were no restrictions based on language or date of<br />

publication.<br />

Selection criteria: Published or unpublished randomised controlled<br />

trials (RCTs) that have compared the effects on ulcer healing<br />

of hydrocolloid with alternative wound dressings or no dressing<br />

in the treatment of foot ulcers in people with diabetes.<br />

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently<br />

performed study selection, risk of bias assessment and data<br />

extraction.<br />

Main results: We included four studies (511 participants) in the<br />

review: these compared hydrocolloids with basic wound contact<br />

dressings, foam dressings and alginate dressings. Meta-analysis<br />

of two studies indicated no statistically significant difference in<br />

ulcer healing between fibrous-hydrocolloids and basic wound<br />

contact dressings: risk ratio 1.01 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.38). One of<br />

these studies found that a basic wound contact dressing was<br />

more cost-effective than a fibrous-hydrocolloid dressing. One<br />

study compared a hydrocolloid-matrix dressing with a foam<br />

dressing and found no statistically significant difference in the<br />

number of ulcers healed. There was no statistically significant<br />

difference in healing between an antimicrobial (silver) fibroushydrocolloid<br />

dressing and standard alginate dressing; or an antimicrobial<br />

dressing (iodine-impregnated) and a standard fibrous<br />

hydrocolloid dressing.<br />

50<br />

Authors’ conclusions: Currently there is no research evidence to<br />

suggest that any type of hydrocolloid wound dressing is more<br />

effective in healing diabetic foot ulcers than other types of dressing.<br />

Decision makers may wish to consider aspects such as<br />

dressing cost and the wound management properties offered by<br />

each dressing type e.g. exudate management.<br />

Plain language summary: Hydrocolloid dressings to promote<br />

foot ulcer healing in people with diabetes when compared with<br />

other dressing types<br />

Diabetes, a condition which leads to high blood glucose concentrations,<br />

is a common condition with around 2.8 million people<br />

affected in the UK (approximately 4.3% of the population).<br />

Dressings are commonly used to treat foot ulcers in people with<br />

diabetes. There are many types of dressings that can be used,<br />

which also vary considerably in cost.This review (four studies<br />

involving a total of 511 participants) identified no research evidence<br />

to suggest that any type of hydrocolloid wound dressing is<br />

more effective in healing diabetic foot ulcers than other types of<br />

dressing.<br />

Alginate dressings for healing diabetic<br />

foot ulcers<br />

Jo C Dumville, Susan O’Meara, Sohan Deshpande,<br />

Katharine Speak<br />

Citation example: Dumville JC, O’Meara S, Deshpande S,<br />

Speak K. Alginate dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers.<br />

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 5 .<br />

Art. No.: CD009110. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009110.<br />

Copyright © <strong>2012</strong> The Cochrane Collaboration.Published by<br />

John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Background: Foot ulcers in people with diabetes mellitus are a<br />

common and serious global health issue. Dressings form a key<br />

part of ulcer treatment, with clinicians and patients having many<br />

different types to choose from including alginate dressings.<br />

A clear and current overview of current evidence is required to<br />

facilitate decision-making regarding dressing use.<br />

Objectives: To compare the effects of alginate wound dressings<br />

with no wound dressing or alternative dressings on the healing<br />

of foot ulcers in people with diabetes mellitus.<br />

Search methods: We searched The Cochrane Wounds Group<br />

Specialised Register (searched 4 January <strong>2012</strong>); The Cochrane<br />

Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane<br />

Library 2011, Issue 4); Ovid MEDLINE (1950 to December<br />

Week 3 2011); Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-<br />

Indexed Citations, January 03, <strong>2012</strong>); Ovid EMBASE (1980 to<br />

2011 Week 52); and EBSCO CINAHL (1982 to 30 December<br />

2011). There were no restrictions based on language or date of<br />

publication.<br />

Selection criteria: Published or unpublished randomised controlled<br />

trials (RCTs) that have compared the effects on ulcer healing<br />

of alginate dressings with alternative wound dressings or no<br />

dressing in the treatment of foot ulcers in people with diabetes.<br />

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently<br />

performed study selection, risk of bias assessment and data<br />

extraction.<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2


Main results: We included six studies (375 participants) in this<br />

review; these compared alginate dressings with basic wound<br />

contact dressings, foam dressings and a silver-containing,<br />

fibrous-hydrocolloid dressing. Meta analysis of two studies found<br />

no statistically significant difference between alginate dressings<br />

and basic wound contact dressings: risk ratio (RR) 1.09 (95% CI<br />

0.66 to 1.80). Pooled data from two studies comparing alginate<br />

dressings with foam dressings found no statistically significant<br />

difference in ulcer healing (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.08).<br />

There was no statistically significant difference in the number of<br />

diabetic foot ulcers healed when an anti-microbial (silver) hydrocolloid<br />

dressing was compared with a standard alginate dressing<br />

(RR 1.40, 95% CI 0.79 to 2.47). All studies had short follow-up<br />

times (six to 12 weeks), and small sample sizes.<br />

Authors’ conclusions: Currently there is no research evidence to<br />

suggest that alginate wound dressings are more effective in<br />

healing foot ulcers in people with diabetes than other types of<br />

dressing however many trials in this field are very small. Decision<br />

makers may wish to consider aspects such as dressing cost and<br />

the wound management properties offered by each dressing<br />

type e.g. exudate management.<br />

Plain language summary: Alginate dressings for healing foot<br />

ulcers in people with diabetes mellitus<br />

Diabetes mellitus, a condition which leads to high blood glucose<br />

concentrations, is a common condition with around 2.8 million<br />

people affected in the UK (approximately 4.3% of the population).<br />

Wound dressings are widely used to treat foot ulcers in<br />

people with diabetes. There are many types of dressings that<br />

B. Braun Wound Care<br />

Prontosan ® and Askina ® – a powerful team<br />

can be used, which also vary considerably in cost. This review<br />

(six studies involving a total of 375 participants) identified no<br />

research evidence to suggest that alginate wound dressings are<br />

more effective in healing diabetic foot ulcers than other types of<br />

dressing. More, better quality research is needed.<br />

Publication in The Cochrane Library Issue 3, <strong>2012</strong><br />

Interventions for treating phosphorus burns<br />

Loai Barqouni, Nafiz Abu Shaaban, Khamis Elessi<br />

Citation example: Barqouni L, Abu Shaaban N, Elessi K.<br />

Interventions for treating phosphorus burns.<br />

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010 , Issue 11.<br />

Art. No.: CD008805. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008805<br />

Copyright © <strong>2012</strong> The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by<br />

John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Background: Phosphorus burns are rarely encountered in usual<br />

clinical practice and occur mostly in military and industrial settings.<br />

However, these burns can be fatal, even with minimal<br />

burn area, and are often associated with prolonged hospitalisation.<br />

Cochrane Reviews<br />

Objectives: To summarise the evidence of effects (beneficial<br />

and harmful) of all interventions for treating people with phosphorus<br />

burns.<br />

�<br />

B. Braun Wound Care products focus on every type of wound at each phase of wound healing. By providing innovative<br />

solutions such as Prontosan ® Wound Irrigation Solution, bacterial biofilm can be efficiently removed thereby clearing the<br />

way for application of advanced wound dressings from the Askina ® range, to assist in the complex task of tissue repair.<br />

B. Braun Medical AG | Infection Control | Sempach | Switzerland<br />

B. Braun Hospicare Ltd. | Collooney | Co. Sligo | Ireland | www.woundcare-bbraun.com<br />

Royal Alliance


Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Wounds Group<br />

Specialised Register (searched 30 September 2011); the<br />

Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The<br />

Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 3); Ovid OLDMEDLINE (1947 to<br />

1965); Ovid MEDLINE (1950 to September Week 3 2011);<br />

Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations<br />

29 September 2011); Ovid EMBASE (1980 to 2011 Week 38);<br />

EBSCO CINAHL (1982 to 23 September 2011) and Conference<br />

Proceedings Citation Index - Science (CPCI-S) (1990 to<br />

30 September 2011).<br />

Selection criteria: Any comparisons of different ways of managing<br />

phosphorus burns including, but not restricted, to randomised<br />

trials.<br />

Data collection and analysis: We found two non-randomised<br />

comparative studies, both comparing patients treated with and<br />

without copper sulphate.<br />

Main results: These two comparative studies provide no evidence<br />

to support the use of copper sulphate in managing phosphorus<br />

burns. Indeed the small amount of available evidence<br />

suggests that it may be harmful.<br />

Authors’ conclusions: First aid for phosphorus burns involves<br />

the common sense measures of acting promptly to remove the<br />

patient’s clothes, irrigating the wound(s) with water or saline<br />

continuously, and removing phosphorus particles. There is no<br />

evidence that using copper sulphate to assist visualisation of<br />

phosphorus particles for removal is associated with better outcome,<br />

and some evidence that systemic absorption of copper<br />

sulphate may be harmful. We have so far been unable to identify<br />

any other comparisons relevant to informing other aspects of<br />

the care of patients with phosphorus burns. Future versions of<br />

this review will take account of information in articles published<br />

in languages other than English, which may contain additional<br />

evidence based on treatment comparisons.<br />

Plain language summary: Interventions for treating phosphorus<br />

burns<br />

Phosphorus is a chemical element sometimes used in a military<br />

or industrial context. Phosphorus burns resulting from military or<br />

industrial injuries are chemical burns that can be fatal. Although<br />

rare, these burns are serious, often very deep and painful, and<br />

can be associated with lengthy periods of time in hospital for<br />

patients.<br />

The usual procedure for dealing with phosphorus burns is to<br />

remove any affected clothing and wash the wounds with water<br />

or saline solution. In addition, copper sulphate can be used to<br />

make the particles of phosphorus more visible and easier to<br />

remove, however, copper sulphate is poisonous and can in itself<br />

be fatal if absorbed into the body. This review found two retrospective<br />

studies (88 patients) that compared burns treated with<br />

or without copper sulphate. The review found no evidence that<br />

using copper sulphate improves the outcome of the burn,<br />

indeed, based upon the limited available evidence, the review<br />

authors suggest that copper sulphate should not be used in the<br />

treatment of phosphorus burns.<br />

No other studies were identified that could be used to assess<br />

other treatments for this type of burn.<br />

52<br />

Publication in The Cochrane Library Issue 4, <strong>2012</strong><br />

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for chronic wounds<br />

Peter Kranke, Michael H Bennett, Marrissa Martyn-St James,<br />

Alexander Schnabel, Sebastian E Debus, Irmgard Roeckl-Wiedmann<br />

Citation example: Kranke P, Bennett MH, Martyn-St James M,<br />

Schnabel A, Debus SE, Roeckl-Wiedmann I. Hyperbaric oxygen<br />

therapy for chronic wounds. Cochrane Database of Systematic<br />

Reviews 2004 , Issue 2 . Art. No.: CD004123. DOI:<br />

10.1002/14651858.CD004123.pub2<br />

Copyright © <strong>2012</strong> The Cochrane Collaboration.<br />

Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Background: Chronic wounds are common and present a health<br />

problem with significant effect on quality of life. Various pathologies<br />

may cause tissue breakdown, including poor blood supply<br />

resulting in inadequate oxygenation of the wound bed. Hyperbaric<br />

oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been suggested to improve<br />

oxygen supply to wounds and therefore improve their healing.<br />

Objectives: To assess the benefits and harms of adjunctive<br />

HBOT for treating chronic ulcers of the lower limb.<br />

Search methods: For this first update we searched the Cochrane<br />

Wounds Group Specialised Register (searched 12 January<br />

<strong>2012</strong>); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials<br />

(CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 4); Ovid<br />

MEDLINE (1950 to January Week 1 <strong>2012</strong>); Ovid MEDLINE<br />

(In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, 11 July <strong>2012</strong>);<br />

Ovid EMBASE (1980 to <strong>2012</strong> Week 01); and EBSCO CINAHL<br />

(1982 to 6 January <strong>2012</strong>).<br />

Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing<br />

the effect on chronic wound healing of therapeutic regimens<br />

which include HBOT with those that exclude HBOT (with or<br />

without sham therapy).<br />

Data collection and analysis: Three review authors independently<br />

evaluated the risk of bias of the relevant trials using the<br />

Cochrane methodology and extracted the data from the<br />

included trials. We resolved any disagreement by discussion.<br />

Main results: We included nine trials (471 participants). Eight<br />

trials (455 participants) enrolled people with a diabetic foot<br />

ulcer: pooled data of three trials with 140 participants showed<br />

an increase in the rate of ulcer healing (risk ratio (RR) 5.20, 95%<br />

confidence interval (CI) 1.25 to 21.66; P = 0.02) with HBOT at<br />

six weeks but this benefit was not evident at longer-term followup<br />

at one year. There was no statistically significant difference in<br />

major amputation rate (pooled data of five trials with 312 participants,<br />

RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.18). One trial (16 participants)<br />

considered venous ulcers and reported data at six weeks<br />

(wound size reduction) and 18 weeks (wound size reduction and<br />

number of ulcers healed) and suggested a significant benefit of<br />

HBOT in terms of reduction in ulcer area only at six weeks<br />

(mean difference (MD) 33.00%, 95% CI 18.97 to 47.03, P <<br />

0.00001). We did not identify any trials that considered arterial<br />

and pressure ulcers.<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2


Authors’ conclusions: In people with foot ulcers due to diabetes,<br />

HBOT significantly improved the ulcers healed in the short term<br />

but not the long term and the trials had various flaws in design<br />

and/or reporting that means we are not confident in the results.<br />

More trials are needed to properly evaluate HBOT in people with<br />

chronic wounds; these trials must be adequately powered and<br />

designed to minimise all kinds of bias.<br />

Plain language summary: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for treating<br />

chronic wounds<br />

Chronic wounds, often associated with diabetes, arterial or<br />

venous disease, are common and have a high impact on the<br />

well-being of those affected. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT)<br />

is a treatment designed to increase the supply of oxygen to<br />

wounds that are not responding to other measures to treat<br />

them. HBOT involves people breathing pure oxygen in a specially<br />

designed chamber (such as that used for deep sea divers<br />

suffering pressure problems after resurfacing).<br />

This review update of randomised trials found that HBOT<br />

seems to improve the chance of healing diabetes-related foot<br />

ulcers and may reduce the number of major amputations in<br />

people with diabetes who have chronic foot ulcers. In addition<br />

this therapy may reduce the size of wounds caused by disease to<br />

the veins of the leg, but the review found no evidence to confirm<br />

or refute any effect on other wounds caused by lack of blood<br />

supply through the arteries or pressure ulcers.<br />

Designed for the<br />

prevention and treatment<br />

of heel pressure ulcers.<br />

• Forefoot support to prevent<br />

foot drop<br />

• Three sizes to ensure a proper fit<br />

• Washable/autoclavable<br />

The soft foam design and spare<br />

elevation pad make it easy to<br />

customize the Heelift to meet a<br />

patient’s unique needs.<br />

• Relieve pressure on the Achilles<br />

tendon or ankle<br />

• Control hip rotation<br />

To request a free sample,<br />

demo DVD, or CD please visit<br />

www.heelift.com/w<br />

Heelift® Patent No. 5,449,339 & 7,458,948.<br />

© <strong>2012</strong>, DM Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. <strong>EWMA</strong><br />

Affixed pad<br />

lifts the leg to<br />

suspend the heel<br />

Europe:<br />

DARCO (Europe) GmbH<br />

Negative pressure wound therapy for skin grafts<br />

and surgical wounds healing by primary intention<br />

Joan Webster, Paul Scuffham, Karen L Sherriff,<br />

Monica Stankiewicz, Wendy P Chaboyer<br />

Citation example: Webster J, Scuffham P, Sherriff KL, Stankiewicz<br />

M, Chaboyer WP. Negative pressure wound therapy for skin<br />

grafts and surgical wounds healing by primary intention.<br />

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 8.<br />

Art. No.: CD009261. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261<br />

Copyright © <strong>2012</strong> The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by<br />

John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Background: Indications for the use of negative pressure wound<br />

therapy (NPWT) are broadening with a range of systems on the<br />

market, including those designed for use on clean, closed incisions<br />

and skin grafts. Reviews have concluded that the evidence<br />

for the effectiveness of NPWT remains uncertain. However, this<br />

is a rapidly evolving therapy. Consequently, a systematic review<br />

of the evidence for the effects of NPWT on postoperative<br />

wounds expected to heal by primary intention is required.<br />

Objectives: To assess the effects of NPWT on surgical wounds<br />

(primary closure or skin grafting) that are expected to heal by<br />

primary intention.<br />

Search methods: We searched the following electronic databases<br />

to identify reports of relevant randomised clinical trials:<br />

the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (searched 11<br />

November 2011); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled<br />

Anatomy of a Heelift ®<br />

Extended stitching<br />

along top rim<br />

supports the<br />

forefoot<br />

Tricot covered stiffener<br />

maintains the boot’s structure<br />

while the friction-free material<br />

allows the boot to easily slide<br />

across bed sheets<br />

Gewerbegebiet 18, 82399 Raisting<br />

Telefon +49 (0) 8807.9228-0<br />

Fax +49 (0) 8807.9228-22<br />

info@darco.de<br />

www.darco-online.com<br />

Available in<br />

smooth and<br />

convoluted<br />

foam interiors<br />

Soft adjustable<br />

straps secure the<br />

boot in place<br />

Global:<br />

Cochrane Reviews<br />

�<br />

Ventilation holes<br />

allow added air<br />

circulation<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

Stand #<br />

X L6<br />

Beveled fixed pad<br />

reduces pressure<br />

on calf<br />

1316 Sherman Ave. Evanston IL 60201<br />

Phone +1 847 328 9540<br />

Fax +1 847 328 7950<br />

info@dmsystems.com<br />

www.heelift.com


Cochrane Reviews<br />

Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 4); Database<br />

of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (The Cochrane Library<br />

2011, Issue 4); Ovid MEDLINE (2005 to October Week 4 2011);<br />

Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations 8<br />

November 2011); Ovid EMBASE (2009 to 2011 Week 44); and<br />

EBSCO CINAHL (1982 to 04 November 2011). We conducted a<br />

separate search to identify economic evaluations.<br />

Visit <strong>EWMA</strong><br />

on our Social Media<br />

platforms<br />

Follow us and get the latest updates about<br />

the <strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2012</strong> Conference<br />

as well as other <strong>EWMA</strong> activities:<br />

www.facebook.com/<strong>EWMA</strong>.Wound<br />

www.linkedin.com/company/<br />

european-wound-management-association<br />

Twitter: @ewmatweet<br />

Remember to use #<strong>EWMA</strong><strong>2012</strong>,<br />

when you tweet about the <strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2012</strong> Conference<br />

54<br />

ienna<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

Selection criteria: We included trials if they allocated patients at<br />

random and compared NPWT with any other type of wound dressing<br />

or compared one type of NPWT with a different type of NPWT.<br />

Data collection and analysis: We assessed trials for their appropriateness<br />

for inclusion and for their quality. This was done by<br />

three review authors working independently, using pre-determined<br />

inclusion and quality criteria.<br />

Main results: We included five eligible trials with a total of 280<br />

participants. Two trials involved skin grafts and three acute<br />

wounds. Only one of the five trials reported the proportion of<br />

wounds completely healed and in this study all wounds healed.<br />

All five studies reported adverse events. In the four trials that<br />

compared standard dressings with negative pressure wound therapy<br />

(NPWT) the adverse event rate was similar between groups<br />

(negative pressure 33/86; standard dressing 37/103); risk ratio<br />

(RR) 0.97 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.33 to 2.89). There<br />

was significant heterogeneity for this result, due to the high incidence<br />

of fracture blisters in the NPWT group in one trial. One<br />

trial (87 participants) compared a commercial negative pressure<br />

device VAC® system with a negative pressure system developed<br />

in the hospital (GSUC). The adverse event rate was lower in the<br />

GSUC group (VAC® 3/42; GSUC 0/45); the RR was 0.13 (95%<br />

CI 0.01 to 2.51). Results indicate uncertainty about the true<br />

effect of either method on adverse events. The mean cost to supply<br />

equipment for VAC® therapy was USD 96.51/day compared<br />

to USD 4.22/day for the GSUC therapy (P = 0.01). Labour costs<br />

for dressing changes were similar. Pain intensity score was also<br />

reported to be lower in the GSUC group when compared with the<br />

VAC® group (p = 0.02)<br />

Authors’ conclusions: Evidence for the effectiveness of NPWT on<br />

complete healing of wounds expected to heal by primary intention<br />

remains unclear. Rates of graft loss may be lower when<br />

NPWT is used; but evidence to date suggests that hospital-based<br />

products are as effective in this area as commercial applications.<br />

There are clear cost benefits when non-commercial systems are<br />

used to create the negative pressure required for wound therapy,<br />

with no reduction in clinical outcome. Pain levels are also rated<br />

lower when hospital systems are compared with their commercial<br />

counterparts. The high incidence of blisters occurring when<br />

NPWT is used following orthopaedic surgery suggests that the<br />

therapy should be limited until safety in this population is established.<br />

Given the cost and widespread use of NPWT, there is an<br />

urgent need for suitably powered, high-quality trials to evaluate<br />

the effects of the newer NPWT products that are designed for use<br />

on clean, closed surgical incisions. Such trials should focus initially<br />

on wounds that may be difficult to heal, such as sternal<br />

wounds or surgeries for obese patients.<br />

Plain language summary: Negative pressure wound therapy for<br />

acute surgical wounds.<br />

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) involves applying suction<br />

to healing wounds. NPWT has been used for many years for<br />

the treatment of chronic wounds, such as leg ulcers and bed<br />

sores. More recently, the device has been modified for use on<br />

clean surgical wounds, including skin grafts. We undertook a<br />

review of studies that have compared NPWT with other wound<br />

treatments. We found five trials which showed that evidence to<br />

support the use of NPWT to promote faster healing and to<br />

reduce complications associated clean surgery remains unclear.<br />

m<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2


Wounds Respond to<br />

ragile Skin � Burns � Skin Tears � EB Wo unds � Full/Partial Thickness Wounds � Traumatic Wounds � Fragile<br />

aumatic Wounds � Full/Partial Thickness W o u n d s � E B Wounds � Skin Tears � Burns � Fragile Skin � Bur<br />

References:<br />

1. Sessions R. Examining the Evidence for a Drug-free Dressing’s Ability to Decrease Wound Pain.<br />

Poster Presentation. Clinical Symposium on Advances in Skin & Wound Care. October 2008. Las Vegas, NV USA.<br />

2. Stenius M. Fast Healing of Pressure Ulcers in Spinal Cord Injured (SCI) People Through the Use of PolyMem ® Dressings.<br />

Poster Presentation. <strong>EWMA</strong>. <strong>May</strong> 2008. Lisbon, Portugal.<br />

3. Tamir J, Haik J. Polymeric Membrane Dressings for Skin Graft Donor Sites: 4 Years Experience on 800 Cases.<br />

Poster Presentation. Clinical Symposium on Advances in Skin & Wound Care. October 2008. Las Vegas, NV USA.<br />

PolyMem’s unique formulation<br />

has the ability to reduce<br />

patients’ total wound pain<br />

experience while actively<br />

encouraging healing 1,2,3<br />

FERRIS MFG. CORP. | 16W300 83rd St., Burr Ridge, IL 60527 USA | International: +1 630.887.9797 | WWW.POLYMEM.EU<br />

Unless otherwise indicated, all trademarks are owned by or licensed to Ferris. © 2010, Ferris Mfg. Corp., 16W300 83rd Street, Burr Ridge, IL 60527 USA MKL-383-I, REV-4, 0910


<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal<br />

Previous Issues<br />

The <strong>EWMA</strong> Journals can be downloaded free of charge from www.ewma.org<br />

56<br />

Volume 12, no 1, January <strong>2012</strong><br />

How to rate the wound debridement trauma?<br />

Jan Stryja<br />

Ensuring equitable wound management education<br />

within the Australian context<br />

Jan Rice<br />

Low wound prevalence and cost burden:<br />

The impact of a multidisciplinary wound specialist team<br />

Alison Hopkins, Fran Worboys, John Posnett<br />

The results of a comprehensive wound audit in a<br />

UK primary care trust<br />

Alison Hopkins, Fran Worboys<br />

Pressure ulcer programme of research – PURPOSE<br />

Nixon J, Wilson L.M, Coleman S, Gorecki C, Muir D, Pinkney L,<br />

Keen J, Briggs M, McGinnis E, Stubbs N, Dealey C, Nelson A<br />

The skin’s own bacteria may aggravate inflammatory and<br />

occlusive changes in atherosclerotic arteries of lower limbs<br />

Waldemar L. Olszewski, Piotr Andziak, M. Moscicka-Wesolowska,<br />

Bozenna Interewicz, Ewa Swoboda, Ewa Stelmach<br />

Problem with the post burn wound pain: Chronic profiles<br />

Laima Juozapaviciene, Rytis Rimdeika, Aurika Karbonskiene<br />

Volume 11, no 3, October 2011<br />

Challenges facing district nurses in the prevention<br />

of pressure ulcers<br />

Lynne Watret<br />

Clinical application of stem cells in wound healing:<br />

A near future?<br />

Benoit I Hendrickx<br />

Understanding the Patient Experience:<br />

Does empowerment link to clinical practice?<br />

Patricia Price<br />

The Influence of Egyptian Propolis on Induced Burn Wound<br />

Healing in Diabetic Rats – Antibacterial Mechanism<br />

Emad T. Ahmed, Osama M. Abo-Salem, Ali Osman<br />

PURSUN UK: The Pressure Ulcer Research Service User<br />

Network for the UK<br />

Delia Muir<br />

Perspective of the European Patients’ Forum Developing<br />

Collaboration<br />

Nicola Bedlington<br />

Volume 11, no 2, <strong>May</strong> 2011<br />

The fight against biofilm infections:<br />

Do we have the knowledge and means?<br />

Klaus Kirketerp-Møller, Thomas Bjarnsholt, Trine R. Thomsen<br />

Biofilms in wounds: An unsolved problem?<br />

António Pedro Fonseca<br />

Diabetic foot ulcer pain: The hidden burden<br />

Sarah E Bradbury, Patricia E Price<br />

Topical negative pressure in the treatment of deep sternal<br />

infection following cardiac surgery: Five year results of first-line<br />

application protocol<br />

Martin Šimek<br />

Wounds Research for Patient Benefit: A five year programme of<br />

research in wound care<br />

Karen Lamb, Nikki Stubbs, Jo Dumville, Nicky Cullum<br />

Volume 11, no 1, January 2011<br />

Who will take on<br />

Ali Barutcu, Aydin O. Enver, Top Husamettin, Violeta Zatrigi<br />

Diabetic foot ulcer pain: The hidden burden<br />

Sarah E Bradbury, Patricia E Price<br />

The reconstructive clockwork as a 21st century concept in<br />

wound surgery<br />

Karsten Knobloch, Peter M. Vogt<br />

Anaemia in patients with chronic wounds<br />

Lotte M. Vestergaard, Isa Jensen, Knud Yderstraede<br />

A survey of the provision of education in wound management<br />

to undergraduate nursing students<br />

Zena Moore, Eric Clarke<br />

Caring for Patients with Hard-to-Heal Wounds – Homecare<br />

Nurses’ Narratives<br />

Camilla Eskilsson<br />

Other Journals<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> wishes to facilitate the exchange of information<br />

on wound healing in a broad perspective with<br />

this section on International Journals.<br />

Italian<br />

English<br />

Finnish<br />

Spanish<br />

Acta Vulnologica, vol. 10, no 1, <strong>2012</strong><br />

www.vulnologia.it<br />

Preliminary survey of the prevalence of chronic skin wounds in<br />

the region of Marche<br />

Pierangeli M., Grassetti L., Torressetti M., Bottoni E., Calamita R.,<br />

Gioacchini M., Tartaglione C., Di Benedetto G. M., Scalise A.<br />

Systematic review of the literature about wound management<br />

Stiavetti E., Poli S., Romanelli M.<br />

Extreme wound care: is it always the best choice?<br />

Presentation of a case report<br />

Palombi M., Fratto D., Cataldo F., Sortino A., Martinelli F.,<br />

Palombi L.<br />

Advances in Skin & Wound Care, vol. 25, no 5, <strong>2012</strong><br />

www.aswcjournal.com<br />

Eradication of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus<br />

in Pressure Ulcers Comparing a Polyhexanide-Containing<br />

Cellulose Dressing with Polyhexanide Swabs in a<br />

Prospective Randomized Study<br />

T. Wild, et al.<br />

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on the Use of<br />

Honey to Protect from the Effects of Radiation-Induced<br />

Oral Mucositis<br />

J. J. Song, P. Twumasi-Ankrah, R. Salcido<br />

Estimates of Evaporation Rates from Wounds for<br />

Various Dressings/Support Surface Combinations<br />

C. Lachenbruch, C. VanGilde<br />

Exploring the Effects of Pain and Stress on Wound Healing<br />

K. Y.Woo<br />

Haava, no. 1, <strong>2012</strong><br />

www.shhy.fi<br />

Haava 1-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Infection or Inflammation?<br />

Ansa Iivanainen, Esa Soppi<br />

Criterions of Wound Infection<br />

Tiina Pukki, Ansa Iivanainen (ed.)<br />

Cost- effective Wound Care<br />

Kielo Turtiainen<br />

SIRO – Do we have the surgical side infections in Finland?<br />

Outi Lyytikäinen<br />

Antibiotics in Management of Infected Wound<br />

Kirsi Skogberg<br />

Wound Management Challenging the Skills of Hand hygienia<br />

Carina Einimö<br />

Wound Infection was Heal but the Patient was Succumb<br />

Tiina Pukki<br />

Wound Management in Home Care<br />

Gunilla Lindholm<br />

Succeeded Treatment of Infected Wound<br />

Päivi Sinkkonen<br />

Diary of the Treatment of Patient with Erysipelas<br />

Mirja Pakkanen<br />

Infection of trauma wound – traumatic experience<br />

Eija Luotola<br />

Individuality in Dermatologic Nursing<br />

Helcos, vol. 23, no. 1, <strong>2012</strong><br />

Quality assessment of the spanish clinical practyice<br />

guidelines of pressure ulcers<br />

Hernandez Martinez-Esparza E; Verdú-Soriano J.<br />

Diaper rash. Local treatment with barrier products and<br />

quality of life<br />

Rueda Lopez J; Guerrero Palmero A; Segovia Gomez;<br />

Muñoz BUeno AM; Bermejo Martinez M; Rosell Moreno C.<br />

Pressure ulcer prevention and muscular and skeletal<br />

injuries. Patient with stoke<br />

Luque Moreno C; Peña Salinas M; Rodriguez Pappalardo F;<br />

López Rodriguez L.<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2


English<br />

English<br />

Int. Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds vol. 11, no 1, <strong>2012</strong><br />

http://ijlew.sagepub.com<br />

Wound Physicians: Lymphedema Is Not a Problem That Will Go<br />

Away if Ignored<br />

Miltos K. Lazarides and Raj Mani<br />

Reporting an Alliance Using an Integrative Approach to the<br />

Management of Lymphedema in India5<br />

Terence J. Ryan and Saravu R. Narahari<br />

From Lymph to Fat: Liposuction as a Treatment for Complete<br />

Reduction of Lymphedema<br />

Håkan Brorson<br />

Multidisciplinary Lymphedema Treatment Program<br />

Maria-Christina Papadopoulou, et.al.<br />

Interdisciplinary Lymphology: The Best Place for Each Discipline in<br />

a Team<br />

Ethel Foeldi and Evangelos P. Dimakakos<br />

The Madura Foot: Looking Deep<br />

Sandhya Venkatswami, Anandan Sankarasubramanian, Shobana<br />

Subramanyam<br />

Diabetic Foot Screening: New Technology versus 10g Monofilament<br />

Michelle C. Spruce and Frank L. Bowling<br />

Management of Neglected Femoral Neck Fractures and Nonunions<br />

using a Novel Triple Surgery Combination: An Indian Experience<br />

Amit Kapoor, Lakshmi Venkatesh Deety, Vinith Zachariah John,<br />

Sathish Devadoss, and A. Devadoss<br />

Custom-Made Orthesis and Shoes in a Structured Follow-Up<br />

Program Reduces the Incidence of Neuropathic Ulcers<br />

in High-Risk Diabetic Foot Patients<br />

Loredana Rizzo, et.al.<br />

International Wound Journal, vol. 9, no 2, <strong>2012</strong><br />

www.wiley.com<br />

Wound management innovation cooperative research centre<br />

– a new model for inter-disciplinary wound research<br />

S Prowse, Z Upton<br />

Prevalence of lymphoedema and quality of life among patients<br />

attending a hospital-based wound management and vascular clinic<br />

G Gethin, D Byrne, S Tierney, H Strapp, S Cowman<br />

Split-thickness skin graft donor site management: a randomized<br />

controlled trial comparing polyurethane with calcium alginate<br />

dressings<br />

L Higgins, J Wasiak, A Spinks, H Cleland<br />

Multimodal therapy as an algorithm to limb salvage in diabetic<br />

patients with large heel ulcers<br />

EB Goudie, C Gendics, JC Lantis II<br />

Elevated uric acid correlates with wound severity<br />

ML Fernandez, Z Upton, H Edwards, K Finlayson, GK Shooter<br />

Comparative study of the microvascular blood flow in the intestinal<br />

wall during conventional negative pressure wound therapy and<br />

negative pressure wound therapy using paraffin gauze over the<br />

intestines in laparostomy<br />

S Lindstedt, J Hansson, J Hlebowicz<br />

Development of an evidence-based protocol for care of pilonidal<br />

sinus wounds healing by secondary intent using a modified reactive<br />

Delphi procedure. Part one: the literature review<br />

CL Harris, S Holloway<br />

Development of an evidence-based protocol for care of pilonidal<br />

sinus wounds healing by secondary intent using a modified Reactive<br />

Delphi procedure. Part 2: methodology, analysis and results<br />

CL Harris, S Holloway<br />

Improving wound score classification with limited remission spectra<br />

J Schmidt, A Hapfelmeier, W-D Schmidt, U Wollina<br />

Leczenie Ran Issue 1, vol. 9, <strong>2012</strong><br />

Biofilm Based Wound Care: strategy for the treatment of chronic<br />

wounds affected by the infection caused by microorganisms in the<br />

form of biofilms<br />

Marzenna Bartoszewicz, Adam Junka<br />

Role of heat shock proteins in burns and systemic inflammatory<br />

response<br />

Beata Sosada, Marek Kawecki, Mariusz Nowak<br />

High Voltage Stimulation for the treatment of hard-to-heal wounds<br />

and oedemas<br />

Krzysztof Materniak, Anna Nowak-Wró¿yna, Marek Kawecki,<br />

Mariusz Nowak<br />

Brachysyndactyly–hypospadiasis and other untypical correlation of<br />

the congenital hand deformities<br />

Anna Chrapusta, Jacek Puchaa<br />

Patient with diabetic foot syndrome in the surgical ward<br />

Katarzyna Cierzniakowska, Maria T. Szewczyk, Arkadiusz Jawieñ,<br />

Karolina Szymañska, Paulina Moœcicka<br />

English<br />

English<br />

German<br />

Scandinavian<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong><br />

Phlebologie, no 2, <strong>2012</strong><br />

www.schattauer.de<br />

The foam sclerotherapy: Observational study using air and<br />

CO2-O2-sclerosing<br />

Hesse<br />

Histological changes after the circular varicose vein treatment<br />

endoluminal thermal ablation (closure fast)<br />

Brachmann<br />

Prevalence of local complications and risk factors of Beinvarikose<br />

in German general practices<br />

Mueller-Buehl<br />

Through the eyes of Laplace: The Role of wall tension in<br />

varicose veins<br />

Korff<br />

Controlled studies comparing endovenous Therapppie of<br />

varicose veins. If the stripping surgery still competitive?<br />

Mumme<br />

Schiller’s illness and his funeral, Part 2 (medical history)<br />

Hach<br />

Acute bilateral thrombosis of deep leg and pelvic veins<br />

Diedrich<br />

Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 20, no 2, <strong>2012</strong><br />

www.wiley.com<br />

Enhancing Braden pressure ulcer risk assessment in acutely ill<br />

adult veterans<br />

Linda J. Cowan, et.al.<br />

The relationship between skin stretching/contraction and<br />

pathologic scarring: The important role of mechanical forces<br />

in keloid generation<br />

Rei Ogawa, et.al.<br />

Role of cytokines in lavage or drainage fluid after hemithyroidectomy<br />

in wound healing: Involvement of histamine in the<br />

acceleration and delay of wound healing<br />

Miku Arai, et.al.<br />

Impaired cutaneous wound healing in transforming growth<br />

factor-b inducible early gene1 knockout mice<br />

Keijiro Hori, et.al.<br />

Selective release of cytokines, chemokines, and growth<br />

factors by minced skin in vitro supports the effectiveness<br />

of autologous minced micrografts technique for chronic ulcer<br />

repair<br />

Ginevra Pertusi, et.al.<br />

Pyrvinium, a potent small molecule Wnt inhibitor, increases<br />

engraftment and inhibits lineage commitment of mesenchymal<br />

stem cells (MSCs)<br />

Sarika Saraswati, et.al.<br />

Wund Management, vol. 6, no 2, <strong>2012</strong><br />

English abstracts are available from www.mhp-verlag.de<br />

How to equip an obesity centre<br />

P. Pick<br />

Antimicrobial therapy of intra-abdominal infections due to<br />

resistant bacteria in patients with morbide obesity<br />

C. Eckmann, P. Kujath, H. Shekarriz<br />

Chronic wounds and nutrition<br />

U. Bonacker<br />

The role of a point-of-care protease test in wound diagnostics<br />

R. Strohal, J. Dissemond, G. Hastermann, K. Herberger,<br />

S. Läuchli, G. Luch, D. <strong>May</strong>er, T. Neubert, M. Storck<br />

Wounds (SÅR) vol. 20, no 1, <strong>2012</strong><br />

www.saar.dk<br />

Growth Factors for the Treatment of Chronic Wounds<br />

Rasmus Lundquist<br />

Interesting Alternative for Debridement of Wounds<br />

Helen Skovgaard-Holm, Helle Simonsen<br />

The History of Wound Infection<br />

Svend Norn, Henrik Permin, Poul R. Kruse, Edith Kruse<br />

Haderslev Makes the Processes More Efficient which have had<br />

Positive Benefits in both Economy and quality<br />

Jens Fonnesbech<br />

Prevention of Pressure Ulcer in the Municipality of Køge<br />

– A success!<br />

Birgit Andersen<br />

”Tele Wounds” for Copenhagen – A pilot project<br />

Jens Fonnesbech<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 57


<strong>EWMA</strong><br />

<strong>EWMA</strong><br />

Teacher network<br />

The <strong>EWMA</strong> Education Committee is currently working<br />

to establish a network for wound management<br />

teachers in Europe. This initiative arose from Pan­<br />

European surveys and focus group interviews of education<br />

providers and teachers of wound management. These activities<br />

unearthed a desire by teachers for greater support in their<br />

teaching of wound management.<br />

The primary objectives of the network will be:<br />

n To increase collaboration on objectives, structure and<br />

content of future wound management education and<br />

training in Europe;<br />

n To explore the possibilities for establishing a sustainable<br />

life­long learning training programme for nurse<br />

teachers.<br />

The <strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2012</strong> conference which takes place in Vienna<br />

23­25 <strong>May</strong> will host the initial meeting of the Teacher Network.<br />

This meeting will take place on Wednesday 23 <strong>May</strong><br />

<strong>2012</strong>, 11:45-13:45.<br />

Meeting Agenda<br />

1) Welcome and introduction of participants<br />

2) Approval of agenda<br />

3) Rationale and background for establishing the network<br />

4) Reflection and input for the network concept<br />

• When reading the email invitation, what did you<br />

have in your mind that a network might be?<br />

• <strong>EWMA</strong>’s vision of what the network might be<br />

5) Establish agreement on key objectives for the network<br />

6) Establish short and long­term action plan to meet the<br />

objectives<br />

7) Agree on the establishment of communication forum<br />

8) Next meeting<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> hopes that the meeting will attract teachers from<br />

many different countries and institutions, as active participation<br />

by all relevant institutions is crucial in ensuring that all<br />

views and needs are addressed.<br />

Teachers interested in joining the meeting or network during<br />

the <strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2012</strong> Conference are kindly asked to sign<br />

up by email to the <strong>EWMA</strong> Secretariat, ewma@ewma.org<br />

or come to the <strong>EWMA</strong> secretariat office during the Vienna<br />

conference in <strong>May</strong>.<br />

Zena Moore<br />

58<br />

ienna<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

23-25 <strong>May</strong><br />

Austrian<br />

Diabetic Foot Symposium<br />

Through the <strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2012</strong> conference in Vienna,<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong>, in collaboration with the Austrian<br />

Wound Association (AWA), The International<br />

Working Group on the diabetic Foot (IWGDF),<br />

The Diabetic Foot Study Group (DFSG) of The<br />

European Association for the study of Diabetes,<br />

has arranged a symposium focusing on the implementation<br />

of multidisciplinary diabetic foot<br />

treatment.<br />

During the presentations the symposium will set<br />

out some of the basic principles of the IWGDF<br />

consensus guidelines, following which the program<br />

will proceed with a session aiming to present<br />

examples of implementation of the multidisciplinary<br />

treatment model from various different regions<br />

across Europe. To wrap up the day an overview<br />

of the current treatment results in Europe<br />

will be given. This presentation will be followed<br />

by a panel discussion aiming to give recommendations<br />

for future strategies towards optimizing<br />

diabetic foot treatment in Austria.<br />

The symposium is an integrated part of a larger<br />

project with the overall objective to support and<br />

contribute actively to the implementation of the<br />

IWGDF’s “Global consensus guidelines on the<br />

management and prevention of the Diabetic<br />

Foot” in Austria in order to allow diabetic foot patients<br />

access to best practice standards of diabetic<br />

foot care at specialised multidisciplinary diabetic<br />

foot care clinics.<br />

The Symposium takes place<br />

Thursday <strong>24</strong> <strong>May</strong> <strong>2012</strong>, 08:00-15:30.<br />

The symposium is in English with simultaneous<br />

translation into German.<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2


International<br />

Consensus on the<br />

management and<br />

prevention of the<br />

diabetic foot 2011<br />

Content:<br />

n Definitions & Criteria<br />

n Epidemiology of the diabetic foot<br />

n Psycho-social and economic factors<br />

n Pathophysiology of foot ulceration<br />

n Diabetic neuropathy<br />

n The diabetic foot ulcer management<br />

and outcomes<br />

n Interventions to enhance the healing<br />

of chronic ulcers of the foot in<br />

diabetes<br />

n Infection in the diabetic foot<br />

n Peripheral arterial disease and<br />

diabetes<br />

n Footwear and offloading<br />

n Neuro-osteoarthropathy<br />

n Amputations in people with diabetes<br />

n How to prevent foot problems<br />

n How to organize a diabetic foot clinic<br />

n Implementation of guidelines<br />

n P.E.D.I.S. a diabetic foot ulcer<br />

classification system<br />

And:<br />

n Practical guidelines on the<br />

management and prevention of<br />

the diabetic foot 2011<br />

n Specific guidelines on wound and<br />

wound bed management 2011<br />

n Specific guidelines for the treatment<br />

of diabetic foot infections 2011<br />

n Specific guidelines for the diagnosis<br />

and treatment of pad in a diabetic<br />

patient with a foot ulcer 2011<br />

n Specific guidelines on footwear<br />

and offloading 2007<br />

Plus many pictures and three video’s.<br />

Now available at: http://shop.idf.org<br />

Price Euro 20.00 (+ shipping)


<strong>EWMA</strong><br />

·PATIENT OUTCOME GROUP·<br />

EUROPEAN · WOUND · MANAGEMENT· ASSOCI<br />

ATION<br />

Pratricia Price<br />

Chair of the<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Patient<br />

Outcome Group<br />

1 Gottrup F, Apelqvist J, Price P:<br />

Outcomes in controlled and comparative<br />

studies on<br />

non-healing wounds:<br />

Recommendations to improve<br />

the quality of evidence in<br />

wound management,<br />

Journal of Wound Care,<br />

Vol 19, Iss 6,<br />

6 June 2010, pp 237-268<br />

The Patient Outcome Group<br />

Following the publication of the <strong>EWMA</strong><br />

document on evidence and outcomes<br />

within wound management 1 , the <strong>EWMA</strong><br />

Patient Outcome Group (POG) received a great<br />

deal of interest and support from both European<br />

and international stakeholders. The level of interest<br />

supports the need for further activities to<br />

develop and disseminate the key messages introduced<br />

in this document.<br />

In order to assist in the development of high<br />

quality evidence across a range of research types<br />

used in wound management, the POG is currently<br />

working on a set of clinical study recommendations<br />

covering the main types of non healing<br />

wounds. Each document will include a short<br />

checklist to assist in the development of relevant<br />

research questions and identify frequent mistakes<br />

made by novice researchers at each stage of the<br />

research process including planning, conducting<br />

and reporting RCTs and cohort studies. To<br />

ensure consistency with existing standards and<br />

regulations, a wide range of links will be included<br />

to ensure that researchers can navigate their way<br />

through the substantial amount of information<br />

available on relevant topics.<br />

The new documents are expected to be ready<br />

for publication in <strong>2012</strong>­2013.<br />

Concurrent with these activities, the <strong>EWMA</strong><br />

POG is in the process of refining the objectives<br />

for the group and prioritising future goals. The<br />

focus will still be on addressing the various common<br />

challenges that clinicians and industry face<br />

by providing a forum for discussion, exchanging<br />

knowledge and generating ideas for the benefits<br />

of <strong>EWMA</strong>’s work and objectives.<br />

Current members of the <strong>EWMA</strong> Patient Outcome Group are:<br />

Clinicians:<br />

Patricia Price, Chair<br />

Martin Abel<br />

Jan Apelqvist<br />

Matthias Augustin<br />

Industry representatives:<br />

Brigitte Espirac<br />

Finn Gottrup<br />

Luc Gryson<br />

Deborah Klestadt<br />

Harald Kuhlmann<br />

Hans Lundgren<br />

Robert Strohal


Say hello to SNaP. ®<br />

My partner in healing.<br />

The SNaP ® Wound Care System combines the portability of advanced<br />

wound dressings with the proven efficacy of negative pressure therapy<br />

in a discreet design that won’t get noticed.<br />

m Small, silent, lightweight design disappears under clothes<br />

m Demonstrated non-inferiority in wound healing outcomes<br />

for patients completing at least 4 weeks of therapy 1<br />

m The SNaP ® System interferes significantly less with overall<br />

activity, sleep and social interactions than the V.A.C. ® System 1<br />

www.spiracur.com<br />

Spiracur Inc.<br />

1180 Bordeaux Drive<br />

Sunnyvale, CA 94089<br />

+1.408.701.5300<br />

1. Armstrong, D. G., W. A. Marston, et al. “Comparison of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with the SNaP®<br />

Wound Care System vs. V.A.C.® Therapy System for the Treatment of Chronic Lower Extremity Ulcers:<br />

A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.” Wound Rep Reg 2011; 19; 173-180.<br />

Spiracur, SNaP and SNaP & Design are registered trademarks of Spiracur Inc.<br />

The SNaP® Wound Care System is protected by one or more U.S.patents, with other<br />

U.S. and certain foreign patents pending. ©<strong>2012</strong> Spiracur Inc. All rights reserved.<br />

Active healing that’s out of sight.


<strong>EWMA</strong><br />

Jan Apelqvist<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> President<br />

62<br />

We want<br />

to make a difference!<br />

– <strong>EWMA</strong> future projects<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> has a number of projects in which we<br />

are obliged to participate or on which we have<br />

an opinion.<br />

For a long time the challenge has been to raise<br />

awareness of wounds in the political arena. However,<br />

the wider focus on the increasing elderly<br />

population and the demographic challenges across<br />

Europe have increased the focus on the burden<br />

of wounds; not only to patients but to the whole<br />

health care system.<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> is participating actively in these discussions.<br />

Most recently, we were invited to speak in<br />

the European Parliament as one MEP is particularly<br />

concerned about the burden of wounds and<br />

the need for increased political focus. (Read about<br />

this on page 64).<br />

Some of the focus areas of <strong>EWMA</strong> for the next<br />

year will be:<br />

n <strong>EWMA</strong> is becoming more involved in the<br />

EU’s institutions and through this involvement<br />

being heard and actively participating<br />

in working groups<br />

n <strong>EWMA</strong> will participate in EU applications<br />

as part of larger consortiums<br />

n <strong>EWMA</strong> has decided to set down a Patient<br />

Panel/Focus Group. As a multidisciplinary<br />

organisation, <strong>EWMA</strong> believes that the patient<br />

is a valuable resource in the multidisciplinary<br />

team. We need to increase the focus<br />

and thereby better understand the potential<br />

of this. <strong>EWMA</strong> will increase the focus on<br />

multidisciplinary teams with a project focussing<br />

on how to organise the treatment;<br />

how to work together across disciplines,<br />

specialities and health care sectors. Read<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong>’s point of view on multidisciplinary<br />

teams on page 66.<br />

n Telemedicine or E­Health is becoming more<br />

and more important as a way of securing the<br />

multidisciplinary approach to care as well as<br />

the patients’ self­management. <strong>EWMA</strong> will<br />

address this issue this year as well as next<br />

year and there will be a session on this in<br />

Copenhagen next year. The focus will be on<br />

sharing information within multidisciplinary<br />

teams, collecting scientific data and furthering<br />

the education of health care personnel,<br />

patients and relatives. <strong>EWMA</strong> will develop<br />

the existing focus on home care and how to<br />

improve the quality of life for patients with a<br />

wound by securing that the right treatment<br />

is given to the patient at all times.<br />

n One of <strong>EWMA</strong>’s key objectives is to assist/<br />

facilitate the creation of new national wound<br />

management associations. Russia and its<br />

neighbouring countries have for a long time<br />

been at the heart of <strong>EWMA</strong>’s work to meet<br />

this objective. Prof. Rytis Rimdeika, member<br />

of <strong>EWMA</strong> Council, has been appointed<br />

by the <strong>EWMA</strong> Council to head this process<br />

and much progress has already been made –<br />

for example, there will be special focus on<br />

this area during the conference this year in<br />

Vienna, Austria, where a large number of<br />

activities in Russian are planned. <strong>EWMA</strong><br />

wishes to continue these efforts and will<br />

follow up on the activities in numerous ways<br />

including, amongst others, a Russian spoken<br />

sym posium at <strong>EWMA</strong> 2013, Copenhagen,<br />

Denmark.<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2


100 years on<br />

The<br />

future<br />

of podiatry<br />

11-13 October <strong>2012</strong><br />

Glasgow, SECC<br />

100 th Anniversary<br />

Conference & Exhibition<br />

<strong>2012</strong> is the 100th anniversary of organised podiatry<br />

in the UK. This year’s conference will be a special<br />

celebratory event, bringing members together in<br />

Glasgow to celebrate this unique and exciting occasion.<br />

The conference committee is producing an exceptional programme of events that will<br />

offer delegates a one-off experience and a conference not to be missed!<br />

We are extremely excited to announce that the hugely popular<br />

physicist and BBC television presenter, Professor Brian Cox OBE,<br />

will be attending the conference as a special guest, with a keynote<br />

presentation on Thursday morning.<br />

Don’t miss the opportunity to present at this year’s conference by submitting an<br />

abstract of your scientific research, practical innovations and areas of general practice<br />

for poster or oral presentation.<br />

The top scoring papers will be presented in the relevant concurrent sessions on their<br />

topic and will also be published in the Journal of Foot & Ankle Research (JFAR).<br />

Cash prizes will be awarded for the best papers.<br />

Oral submissions deadline 29 April <strong>2012</strong><br />

Poster submissions deadline 31 August <strong>2012</strong><br />

To submit an abstract or for further information visit<br />

www.scpconference.com<br />

or call 020 88327311


<strong>EWMA</strong> Document on<br />

Antimicrobials<br />

The document form will be developed from a<br />

Health Technology Assessment, where elements of<br />

health economics and patient perspectives will be<br />

represented as well as a comprehensive technological<br />

review.<br />

The document will include political, organisational<br />

and economic points of view in addition to the<br />

clinical discussion regarding when to use which<br />

categorised product. Furthermore, as <strong>EWMA</strong> is a<br />

multidisciplinary organisation, we will take all specialities<br />

into consideration. This is also reflected in the<br />

composition of the author group. The document will<br />

result in recommendations. We expect that one of<br />

the main focus areas of the document will be antimicrobial<br />

resistance.<br />

Members of the working group are:<br />

n Finn Gottrup, Surgery,<br />

Bispebjerg Hospital, Denmark<br />

n Jan Apelqvist, Endocrinologist (health economy),<br />

University Hospital of Malmö, Sweden<br />

n Zena Moore, Nursing,<br />

Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Ireland<br />

n Sebastian Probst, Nursing, Zurich University of<br />

Applied Sciences, Switzerland<br />

n Rose Cooper, Microbiology,<br />

Cardiff Metropolian University (UWIC), Wales<br />

n Thomas Bjarnsholt, Microbiology/biofilm,<br />

Copenhagen University, Denmark<br />

n Edgar Peters, Infection, University Medical<br />

Center, Amstersdam, The Netherlands<br />

Finn Gottrup<br />

Supporting Companies<br />

64<br />

AWCS group<br />

EU ‘WEEK FOR LIFE’<br />

Prof. Jan Apelqvist, Mr. Alojz Peterlé, Dr. Bernard Thill<br />

and Mr. Vittorio Prodi<br />

On 26 March <strong>2012</strong> <strong>EWMA</strong> was invited by Member<br />

of the EU Parliament, Mr Vittorio Prodi, to<br />

present in a seminar during the ‘week for life’<br />

event under the theme: Europe against Cancer –<br />

the spirit of care. The invitation was based on the<br />

strong profile of <strong>EWMA</strong> within multidisciplinarity<br />

and organisation of treatment.<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> President, Jan Apelqvist, described the<br />

importance of a multidisciplinary approach to<br />

wound management and applied this approach to<br />

any kind of treatment. The <strong>EWMA</strong> presentation<br />

also related wound management to the organisation<br />

of palliative care for cancer patients, stressing<br />

that the multidisciplinary approach is essential<br />

with regards to the quality of life of the patient<br />

as well as efficiency within the health care system.<br />

The primary message of <strong>EWMA</strong> was the importance<br />

of removing barriers for collaboration<br />

between different specialists and groups of staff.<br />

Failure to remove these barriers is likely to cause<br />

an expensive treatment of poor quality.<br />

MEP Prodi expressed his gratitude for the presence<br />

of <strong>EWMA</strong> at the meeting and confirmed his<br />

great interest in wound management.<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2


<strong>EWMA</strong>’s communication strategy was discussed at the<br />

latest <strong>EWMA</strong> Council meeting in March. The Council<br />

decided that it would be possible to make some small<br />

changes to the overall communication which <strong>EWMA</strong> has<br />

with its members. These include: <strong>EWMA</strong> Journal as a<br />

member magazine, <strong>EWMA</strong> Newsletter, the <strong>EWMA</strong> website<br />

and the communicative activities at the <strong>EWMA</strong> conference.<br />

Technology and the number of communication tools<br />

available is ever increasing and improving. This offers<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> many new opportunities to communicate more<br />

efficiently with the <strong>EWMA</strong> stakeholders.<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal is primarily designed to be a membership<br />

journal, with a specific focus on promoting activities<br />

and sharing wound relevant news, scientific knowledge<br />

and clinical experience between the target groups:<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> members, <strong>EWMA</strong> Cooperating Organisations,<br />

other partner organisations, sponsoring companies and<br />

health administrators/decision-makers. At the same time<br />

this meets another <strong>EWMA</strong> objective of facilitating the<br />

spread of knowledge on wound care and educating new<br />

generations of wound care professionals.<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Council has decided to reduce the number of<br />

issues of the <strong>EWMA</strong> Journal to two per year, published in<br />

<strong>May</strong> and October. This decision will support the unique<br />

profile of the <strong>EWMA</strong> Journal with the objective of supplementing<br />

existing wound journals rather than competing<br />

with them. Finally, a reduction in the number of issues of<br />

the <strong>EWMA</strong> Journal from 2013 give capacity for activities<br />

covering other communication tools.<br />

The <strong>EWMA</strong> Journal will continue to reflect <strong>EWMA</strong>’s<br />

knowledge and expertise with respect to wound management<br />

activities across Europe. Sue Bale<br />

ienna<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

23-25 <strong>May</strong><br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Document on<br />

Debridement<br />

The <strong>EWMA</strong> document on Debridement will provide an<br />

updated overview of the various debridement options.<br />

It will offer a clarification of the principal role of debridement<br />

and define the possibilities and limitations for<br />

standard and new debridement options.<br />

The document is expected ready for publication by the<br />

end of summer <strong>2012</strong> and will be written by an author<br />

group consisting of: Robert Strohal, Editor,<br />

Jan Apelqvist, Co-editor, Joachim Dissemond,<br />

Julie Jordan O’Brien, Alberto Piaggesi, Rytis Rimdeika<br />

and Trudie Young.<br />

A key session on Debridement at the <strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

Conference in Vienna will present the main topics of<br />

the document:<br />

Key session: Debridement<br />

Wednesday 23 <strong>May</strong> 16.45-18.00<br />

• R. Strohal: The position of debridement in<br />

wound healing: An introduction<br />

• T. Young: Bedside options for debridement<br />

• R. Rimdeika: Surgical debridement and technical<br />

solutions<br />

• J. Apelqvist: Challenges and health-economy<br />

• R. Strohal: The process of debridement and a<br />

clinical algorithm<br />

Robert Strohal<br />

The <strong>EWMA</strong> Debridement Document is supported by:<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2012</strong>: Russian spoken Symposium in Vienna<br />

Following the success of the Russian symposium during<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> 2009 in Helsinki, a full day symposium in Russian will<br />

take place on Wednesday 23rd <strong>May</strong>, 10:00-19:00.<br />

The symposium includes 25 presentations from Russia, Ukraine and Belarus,<br />

including a round table discussion with representatives from the national<br />

wound management organisations. Among the topics are:<br />

Pediatric Wounds, Burns, Evidence-based approach and Chronic Wounds.<br />

The symposium is organized by <strong>EWMA</strong> and AWA. It is held in Russian with<br />

simultaneous translation into English.<br />

A number of sessions on Thursday <strong>24</strong> <strong>May</strong> will also be translated<br />

from English into Russian.<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 65<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong>


<strong>EWMA</strong> focus on multidisciplinarity<br />

in wound management<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> is a multidisciplinary association working to<br />

secure the best possible treatment of the patient, provided<br />

in a cost efficient manner to the benefit of society.<br />

For these reasons, it is important for <strong>EWMA</strong> to<br />

stress the significance of securing a multidisciplinary<br />

approach to wound management throughout Europe.<br />

The key messages of <strong>EWMA</strong> are:<br />

n The multidisciplinary approach to wound management<br />

improves healing rates, prevents adverse events<br />

and increases patients’ quality of life1,2,3,4,5 n Outcome studies support that the multidisciplinary<br />

approach reduces the overall cost to society4,5,6 n Multidisciplinary wound centers secure a high level<br />

of expertise within the group of staff, resulting in a<br />

fast and correct diagnosis and treatment of the patient1,3<br />

n Existing barriers for collaboration between different<br />

specialists and groups of staff must be defined and<br />

removed.<br />

MULTIDISCIPLINARITy – A DEFINITION<br />

Multidisciplinary collaboration is established with the<br />

objective of producing outcomes that cannot be achieved<br />

without collaboration. A multidisciplinary approach brings<br />

together experts from the various relevant disciplines to<br />

collectively address a complex problem 7,8 .<br />

Within wound management in general the relevance of<br />

multidisciplinarity lies in the need to integrate knowledge<br />

of different aspects of treatment such as wound healing,<br />

tissue repair, wound care, long term scarring and specialist<br />

knowledge about the various etiologies.<br />

The multidisciplinary approach to wound management<br />

is often expressed in the establishment of wound<br />

healing expert groups in hospitals or wound healing centers<br />

3 .<br />

References:<br />

1. Apelqvist, J, Larsson, J: What is the most effective way<br />

to reduce incidence of amputation in the diabetic<br />

foot?, Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews,<br />

Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2000; 16 (Suppl 1);<br />

pp. 75-S83.<br />

2. McCabe, C.J., R.C. Stevenson, A.M. Dolan: Evaluation<br />

of a diabetic foot screening and protection<br />

programme, Diabetic Medicine, January 1998, vol. 15;<br />

Issue 1; pp. 80–84.<br />

3. Gottrup, F, Holstein, P, Jørgensen, B, Lohmann, M,<br />

Karlsmark, T.: A New Concept of a Multidisciplinary<br />

Wound Healing Center and a National Expert Function<br />

of Wound Healing, Arch. Surgery. July 2001; vol.136;<br />

pp. 765-772<br />

66<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong><br />

4. Kadriye A, Mehlika I, Karakaya J, Gürlek A: Change in<br />

amputation predictors in diabetic foot disease: effect of<br />

multidisciplinary approach, Endocr (2010) 38: 87-92<br />

5. Driver Vickie R, Fabbi M, Lavery L A, Gibbons G: The<br />

cost of diabetic foot: The economic case for the limb<br />

salvage team, Journal of vascular surgery, September<br />

Supplement 2010<br />

6. Matricali G A, Dereymaeker G, Muls E, Flour M,<br />

Mathieu C: Economic aspects of diabetic foot care in a<br />

multidisciplinary setting: A review, Diabetes/metabolism<br />

research and reviews, review article Diabetes<br />

Metab Res Rev 2007; vol 23; pp. 339-347.<br />

The Diabetic Foot Example<br />

Diabetic foot ulcers represent a large percentage of the<br />

chronic wounds. Due to the total situation of the diabetes<br />

patient, these ulcers are characterised by a complexity that<br />

necessitates a multifactorial approach in which aggressive<br />

management of infection and ischemia is of major importance.<br />

For the same reason, a process­oriented approach<br />

in the evaluation of prevention and management of the<br />

diabetic foot is essential.<br />

Thus, correct diagnosis and treatment requires a multidisciplinary<br />

team including diabetologists, orthopedic<br />

surgeons, vascular surgeons, diabetes nurses, wound care<br />

nurses, podiatrists and orthotists. A close co­operation<br />

with primary health care is also important 1 .<br />

The negative consequences of diabetic foot ulcers on<br />

quality of life include not only morbidity but also disability<br />

and premature mortality. Costs for healing ulcers are high.<br />

For ulcers resulting in amputation they are even higher,<br />

due to prolonged hospitalisation, rehabilitation, and need<br />

for home care and social service.<br />

One of the most important steps to reduce cost in the<br />

management of the diabetic foot is to avoid amputations.<br />

A cost­effective management should not only be focused<br />

on the short­term cost until healing but also on the longterm<br />

cost related to increased re­ulceration rate and lifelong<br />

disability caused by foot ulcers and amputations. A<br />

multidisciplinary approach including a preventive strategy,<br />

patient and staff education, and multifactorial treatment of<br />

foot ulcers has been reported to reduce the amputation rate<br />

significantly and in some cases by more than 50% 1,4,5,9 .<br />

Currently various barriers for collaboration between different<br />

specialists and groups of staff exist. Failure to remove<br />

these barriers is likely to result in an expensive treatment<br />

of poor quality.<br />

Jan Apelqvist<br />

7. Gottrup F, Nix DP, Bryant RA.: The Multidisciplinary<br />

Team Approach to Wound Management<br />

In: Acute and chronic wounds. Current management<br />

concepts. (Third edition). Eds. Ruth A. Bryant, Denise<br />

P. Nix. Mosby (Elsevier), St. Louise, 2007; pp. 23-38.<br />

8. Davey L, Solomon JM, Freeborn SF: A multidisciplinary<br />

approach to wound care, Journal of Wound Care.<br />

1994; vol. 3; pp. <strong>24</strong>9-252.<br />

9. Ragnarson-Tenvall G, Apelqvist J. Prevention of<br />

diabetes-related foot ulcers and amputations: a<br />

cost-utility analysis based on Markov model simulations.<br />

Diabetologia. 2001; vol. 44; pp. 2077-2087<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2


23 rd Conference of the<br />

European Wound Management Association<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> 2013<br />

15-17 <strong>May</strong> · 2013 · Copenhagen · Denmark<br />

New abstract deadline: 1 January 2013<br />

ORGANISATION AND<br />

COOPERATION IN COPENHAGEN<br />

Organised by the European Wound Management Association<br />

in cooperation with the Danish Wound Healing Society · www.saar.dk<br />

WWW.<strong>EWMA</strong>.ORG / <strong>EWMA</strong>2013


<strong>EWMA</strong><br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> participation in EU Conference on<br />

Antimicrobials Resistance – it’s time to take joint action!<br />

On 14 March <strong>2012</strong> Rytis Rimdeika, Member of the<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Council, represented <strong>EWMA</strong> at a high level<br />

EU presidency Conference: Combating Antimicrobials<br />

Resistance – Time for Joint Action. <strong>EWMA</strong> was selected<br />

amongst leading expert groups across Europe to take part<br />

in the conference. The conference was held in the Bella<br />

Centre in Copenhagen, Denmark, which coincidentally<br />

is also the venue of the next <strong>EWMA</strong> conference in 2013.<br />

The conference was jointly hosted by the Ministry of<br />

Health and the Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries<br />

of Denmark and by the EU­Commission. Participation<br />

in the conference is linked to the <strong>EWMA</strong> Document on<br />

Antimicrobials which is expected to be ready for publication<br />

by the end of <strong>2012</strong>.<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> considers the conference invitation a significant<br />

accomplishment as regards reaching out to national<br />

authorities as well as to the European Union. This is part<br />

of <strong>EWMA</strong>’s long term strategy – to place wound management<br />

high on the political agenda both nationally and in<br />

the EU Institutions.<br />

The conference was opened by Her Royal Highness Crown<br />

Princess Mary of Denmark. Key speakers at the first session<br />

were Dr. Margaret Chan, Director­General of the World<br />

Health Organisation (WHO) and Dr. Marc Sprenger, Director<br />

of the European Centre for Disease Preventions and<br />

Control (ECDC). All the speakers spoke of the dangers<br />

of excessive use of antimicrobials in medicines for both<br />

humans and animals. The microbial resistance to antibiotics<br />

is emerging in all the countries of the EU and beyond.<br />

Research has indicated a link between the consumption<br />

of antibiotics in animals and resistance development in<br />

humans. Overuse of antibiotics in medicine, both in primary<br />

health sector and hospitals is exacerbating the problem.<br />

This calls for collaboration between the human and<br />

veterinary sectors across the EU and non­governmental<br />

organisations to combat the growing problem of antibiotic<br />

overuse. The sharing of innovative ideas and the exchange<br />

of best practices are needed.<br />

The two day conference consisted of theoretical lectures<br />

and practical workshops. Presentations were given by many<br />

well­known specialists in veterinary and human medicine<br />

and public health and by politicians. Best practices and<br />

initiatives to reduce antimicrobial resistance in Denmark,<br />

the UK and France were presented to the audience. The<br />

Workshops were focused on three topics: Stop the overuse<br />

of antibiotics both in humans and animals; reduce the<br />

68<br />

use of Critically Important Antimicrobials (CIA), and the<br />

surveillance and collection of compatible data. Participants<br />

of the conference stressed the need for surveillance and<br />

reduction of irrational use of CIAs – Fluoroquinolones,<br />

Cephaslosporins (these two groups widely used in both<br />

human and veterinary medicine), Cholestin (used only<br />

in veterinary) and Carbapenems (authorised for human<br />

use). Antimicrobial resistance against the CIAs is particularly<br />

worrying, as they are “the last resort” treatment for<br />

a number of very serious diseases. A strictly prudent use<br />

of CIAs should therefore be implemented internationally<br />

as resistant microbes can spread worldwide through the<br />

global movement of persons and food products of animal<br />

origin.<br />

Participants of the conference outlined these final statements<br />

and conclusions:<br />

1. Antibiotics in animal health should only be used in<br />

context of biosecurity, good nutrition, good housing<br />

and vaccinations being in place.<br />

2. Good examples of best practice are extremely important<br />

for promoting the prudent use of antibiotics.<br />

3. Guidelines should be established for the prudent use<br />

of antimicrobials in the primary health sector and<br />

the hospital sector. Better control of use of antibiotics<br />

in long care institutions is also important.<br />

4. It is very important to raise awareness among the<br />

publics regarding the overuse and improper use of<br />

antibiotics and the risks for the individual arising<br />

from that over / improper use.<br />

5. Clear legal framework both in the EU and at national<br />

levels is needed to fight the problem.<br />

6. Collection, analysis and real time reporting of data<br />

is essential for the understanding of the problem and<br />

the planning of means to combat the problem.<br />

The dangers of excessive use of antimicrobials have been<br />

known for decades. Raising awareness and taking action<br />

against microbial resistance is not new to the European<br />

Union, but taking further action within the Union and beyond<br />

is now necessary in order to effectively meet the challenges<br />

of that growing resistance. And non­governmental<br />

international organisations such as those in the wound<br />

management field like <strong>EWMA</strong> and its cooperating partners<br />

will play an important role in helping to implement<br />

the very important tasks required for a positive outcome.<br />

In other words – it’s time to take joint action!<br />

Rytis Rimdeika<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2


Submit your next paper to Phlebologie<br />

iris.weiche@schattauer.de


The Eucomed Advance Wound Care Sector<br />

Group is currently involved in<br />

many activities and initiatives at the<br />

European Union level. A number of these are<br />

where AWCS and <strong>EWMA</strong> are currently working<br />

together. These are listed below.<br />

To begin with I will elaborate on the EU 2020<br />

goals and strategy which are highly relevant to<br />

the work we are currently conducting. The Eucomed<br />

/ AWCS group is involved in the<br />

projects italicized.<br />

EU 2020 GOAL & STRATEGy<br />

Woundcare reflections<br />

on the EU 2020 strategy<br />

– Eucomed Advanced Wound Care Sector Group (AWCS) perspectives<br />

Hans Lundgren<br />

Chair of the Eucomed<br />

Advanced Wound Care<br />

Sector Group<br />

Correspondence:<br />

Hans.Lundgren@<br />

molnlycke.com<br />

70<br />

The five targets for the EU in 2020<br />

(and how to measure progress)<br />

Policies and Commission initiatives are driven by<br />

these overall goals:<br />

1. Employment<br />

• 75% of the 20­64 year­olds to be employed<br />

2. R&D / Innovation<br />

• 3% of the EU’s GDP (public and private<br />

combined) to be invested in R&D / innovation<br />

3. Climate change / Energy<br />

• greenhouse gas emissions 20% lower than<br />

1990<br />

• 20% of energy from renewables<br />

• 20% increase in energy efficiency<br />

4. Education<br />

• reducing school drop­out rates below<br />

10%<br />

• at least 40% of 30­34 year­olds completing<br />

third level education<br />

5. Poverty / Social exclusion<br />

• at least 20 million fewer people in or at<br />

risk of poverty and social exclusion<br />

The seven flagship initiatives<br />

(new engines to boost growth and jobs)<br />

Smart growth:<br />

1. Digital agenda for Europe<br />

2. Innovation Union<br />

3. Youth on the move<br />

Sustainable growth:<br />

4. Resource efficient Europe<br />

5. An industrial policy for the globalisation era<br />

Inclusive growth:<br />

6. An agenda for new skills and jobs<br />

7. European platform against poverty<br />

DIGITAL AGENDA FOR EUROPE<br />

This is a strategy to ensure a flourishing digital<br />

economy by 2020. It outlines policies and actions<br />

to maximize the benefit of the Digital Revolution<br />

for all. One of the planned actions of the Digital<br />

Agenda is Information and Communication<br />

Technology (ICT) for Social Challenges. This is<br />

where the Commission aims to increase access<br />

to online medical data2 and assisted living programmes3<br />

and the uptake of eHealth solutions1<br />

through EU wide standards,.<br />

AWCS and <strong>EWMA</strong> are involved in e­health solutions<br />

and access to online medical data as well as<br />

assisted living programmes.<br />

INNOVATION UNION<br />

This aims to increase the innovation potential of<br />

Europe by removing obstacles to innovation and<br />

revolutionizing the way the public and private sectors<br />

work together4. The first pilot partnership is<br />

the European Partnership on Active and Healthy<br />

Ageing (AHAIP)5 which aims to bring together<br />

stakeholders from the supply and demand sides4<br />

to identify and overcome barriers to innovation in<br />

the health sector with the intended goal of adding<br />

two quality years to the lives of European citizens<br />

by 2020.<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2


AWCS and <strong>EWMA</strong> are involved in the organisation of<br />

care and the referral of patients between different sectors.<br />

As part of the Active and Healthy Ageing Partnership<br />

AWCS and <strong>EWMA</strong> are following the proceedings closely<br />

and are very involved.<br />

PATIENT SAFETy CAMPAIGN<br />

The Council Recommendations on patient safety including<br />

the prevention and control of HCAIs (Health Care<br />

Acquired Infections) were adopted in 2009 and provide<br />

non­binding recommendations for Member States regarding<br />

patient safety. As part of the recommendations, the<br />

European Commission is mandated to review the progress<br />

made by member states since 2009. The implementation<br />

of the recommendations is being evaluated through a questionnaire6<br />

sent out to member states in April 2011, which<br />

includes a general safety section and a portion dedicated<br />

specifically to HCAIs. A report on the responses must be<br />

published by <strong>2012</strong>.<br />

Additionally, a Joint Action on Patient Safety and Quality<br />

of Care is being organized to assist the Commission<br />

with implementation of certain aspects of the Council<br />

Recommendations, particularly concerning coordination<br />

and exchange of best practices within the member states.<br />

For example, AWCS / <strong>EWMA</strong> will aim to ensure the adoption<br />

of patient safety recommendations for the prevention<br />

of wounds/infections and to make sure that exchange of<br />

best practice with regards to wound care is considered<br />

within the Joint Action. This can be seen as a follow up<br />

on the activities conducted in 2011, where <strong>EWMA</strong> and<br />

AWCS submitted questions for the member states’ questionnaire<br />

on patient safety.<br />

ACTIVITIES/INITIATIVES WHERE<br />

AWCS/<strong>EWMA</strong> ARE CURRENTLy INVOLVED<br />

1. Wound treatment in patient’s own home by<br />

collaboration between hospital and home care:<br />

A Health Technology Assessment<br />

In December 2011, the Danish National Board of<br />

Health published an HTA with the above title.<br />

The HTA concluded, amongst other things, that<br />

patients with pressure ulcers which are treated by<br />

a wound care nurse from the hospital wound care<br />

centre, are healed equally well in their own home as<br />

at the hospital.<br />

2. Transcontinental Wound Registry (TWR)<br />

The AWT (Academy of Wound Technology), together<br />

with supporting partners from the industry,<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong><br />

has started a pilot project of a worldwide registry<br />

on wound healing and tissue repair. Nine facilities,<br />

with expertise in wound management and located in<br />

Europe, the USA and Asia, are participating in a 52<br />

week pilot phase. The TWR pilot phase results will<br />

be presented at the WUWHS meeting on Yokohama<br />

in September <strong>2012</strong>.<br />

3. Innovation in the sector of demographic ageing<br />

A first step has been taken through the contact with<br />

AAL (Ambient Assisted Living) which has a seat at<br />

the European Innovation Partnership: Pilot on Active<br />

& Healthy Ageing. For advanced wound care,<br />

potential topics are telemedicine, monitoring devices<br />

and patient specific data.<br />

4. Collaboration between the industry and academia<br />

Since June 2007, Eucomed AWCS has held twenty<br />

meetings in partnership with <strong>EWMA</strong>, which reflects<br />

the spirit of the Innovation Partnership.<br />

5. European Innovation Partnership on Active and<br />

Healthy Ageing (AHAIP)<br />

Adoption of the Strategic Implementation Plan<br />

(SIP) and call for stakeholders to populate the five<br />

task forces. A letter has been sent from Mr Prodi<br />

inviting <strong>EWMA</strong> to become a member of the Task<br />

Force responsible for implementing actions in the<br />

area of developing, disseminating and promoting<br />

successful innovative integrated care models for<br />

chronic diseases amongst older patients.<br />

6. Questionnaire about Patient Safety sent out by<br />

the European Commission<br />

AWCS/<strong>EWMA</strong> have the opportunity to support<br />

the European Commission with questions related<br />

to wound care. The engagement raises awareness in<br />

the Commission of AWCS/<strong>EWMA</strong>’s interest in this<br />

dossier and provides an avenue for future discussions<br />

with the Commission – particularly the use of<br />

adequate wound care treatments to increase patient<br />

safety through prevention and control of infections.<br />

7. Joint Action on Patient Safety and Quality of Care<br />

The Joint Action is being organized by HAS (Haute<br />

Autorité de Santé) in France and there are more than<br />

40 Associated Partners (EPF, European Patient’s<br />

Forum is one) participating, in addition to the 17<br />

Collaborating Partners. In order to take a seat in<br />

this Joint Action, AWCS/<strong>EWMA</strong> need to highlight<br />

any substantial public health issue. We think the<br />

ongoing debate on antibiotic­resistance is a potential<br />

opening to raise awareness on issues of patient safety<br />

related to wound care, specifically in terms of surgical<br />

wounds, pressure ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers.<br />

Therefore <strong>EWMA</strong> has taken the initiative to write a<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Antimicrobial Document. m<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 71


Corporate A<br />

ConvaTec Europe<br />

www.convatec.com<br />

Covidien (UK) Commercial Ltd.<br />

Paul Hartmann AG<br />

www.hartmann.info<br />

Corporate B<br />

3M Health Care<br />

www.mmm.com<br />

Abbott Nutrition<br />

www.abbottnutrition.com<br />

Absorbest<br />

www.absorbest.se<br />

Advanced BioHealing, Inc.<br />

www.AdvancedBioHealing.com<br />

AOTI Ltd.<br />

www.aotinc.net<br />

72<br />

Corporate Sponsors<br />

KCI Europe Holding B.V.<br />

www.kci-medical.com<br />

Lohmann & Rauscher<br />

www.lohmann-rauscher.com<br />

Mölnlycke Health Care Ab<br />

www.molnlycke.com<br />

Ferris Mfg. Corp.<br />

www.PolyMem.eu<br />

ArjoHuntleigh<br />

www.ArjoHuntleigh.com<br />

B. Braun Medical<br />

www.bbraun.com<br />

BSN medical GmbH<br />

www.bsnmedical.com<br />

www.cutimed.com<br />

Chemviron<br />

www.chemvironcarbon.com<br />

Curea Medical GmbH<br />

www.curea-medical.de<br />

www.drawtex.com<br />

Flen pharma NV<br />

www.flenpharma.com<br />

Nutricia Advanced<br />

Medical Nutrition<br />

www.nutricia.com<br />

Organogenesis<br />

Switzerland GmbH<br />

www.organogenesis.com<br />

Wound Management<br />

Smith & Nephew Medical Ltd<br />

www.smith-nephew.com/wound<br />

Sorbion AG<br />

www.sorbion.com<br />

Systagenix Wound Management<br />

www.systagenix.com<br />

Phytoceuticals<br />

www.1wound.info<br />

Argentum Medical LLC<br />

www.silverlon.com<br />

Söring<br />

www.soering.com<br />

Laboratoires Urgo<br />

www.urgo.com<br />

Welcare Industries SPA<br />

www.welcaremedical.com<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2


Conference Calendar<br />

Conferences Theme <strong>2012</strong> Days City Country<br />

Chronic Wounds Initiative (ICW) Annual Congress <strong>May</strong> 9-10 Bremen Germany<br />

Congress of the Swiss Association for Wound Care (French section) <strong>May</strong> 10 Morges Switzerland<br />

22nd Conference of the<br />

European Wound Management Association<br />

13th European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics<br />

and Traumatology (EFORT) Congress<br />

German Society of Wound Healing and Wound Treatment (DGfW)<br />

Annual Meeting<br />

Wound healing – different<br />

perspectives, one goal<br />

<strong>May</strong> 23-25 Vienna Austria<br />

<strong>May</strong> 23-25 Berlin Germany<br />

Jun 14-16 Kassel Germany<br />

The 2nd Euro-Asian Forum of Association for Wound management Jun <strong>24</strong>-29 Sarajevo Bosnia and<br />

Herzegovina<br />

International Lymphoedema Framework <strong>2012</strong> Conference (ILF) Jun 28-30 Montpellier France<br />

4th Congress of the World Union of Wound Healing Societies Better care – Better Life Sep 2-6 Yokohama Japan<br />

The Annual Spring Symposium on Advanced Wound Care (SAWC/WHS) Sep 12-14 Baltimore USA<br />

15th Annual European Pressure Ulcer Meeting (EPUAP) Sep 18-21 Cardiff United Kingdom<br />

SAfW Symposium Swiss Association for Wound Care (SAfW)<br />

Symposium (German section)<br />

Sep 20 Zürich Switzerland<br />

31st Annual meeting of the European Bone and Joint Infection Society Sep 20-22 Montreux Switzerland<br />

The 12th Annual Leg Club Conference Sep 26-27 Worcester United Kingdom<br />

11th National Congress of Italian Association for the Study of<br />

Cutaneous Ulcers (AIUC)<br />

Sep 26-29 Rimini Italy<br />

10th Scientific Meeting of Diabetic Foot Study Group (DFSG) Sep 28-30 Berlin-Potsdam Germany<br />

National Congress of the Belgian Federation of Wound Care (BEFEWO) Oct Uccle Belgium<br />

4th Scientific Congress of the Polish Wound Management Association (PWMA) Oct 3-6 Bydgoszcz Poland<br />

1st National Multidisciplinary Congress for Wound Professionals Oct 8-9 Ede Netherlands<br />

Pisa International Diabetic Foot Courses Oct 8-11 Pisa Italy<br />

Croatian Wound Association (CWA) Symposium Oct <strong>24</strong>-26 Primosten Croatia<br />

Sympoisum APTFeridas <strong>2012</strong> Oct 25-26 Portugal<br />

GNEAUPP Biennial Meeting Pressure Ulcers and<br />

Chronic Wounds<br />

Nov 14-16 Sevilla Spain<br />

The Neuropathic Osteoarthropathic Foot (Charcot Foot Course) Nov 15-17 Rheine Germany<br />

Danish Wound Healing Society (DSFS) Annual Meeting Nov 22-23 Kolding Denmark<br />

International Congress for Wound Management of<br />

the Serbian Wound Healing Society SWHS<br />

The French and Francophone Society of Wounds and Wound<br />

Healing annual conference<br />

Chronic Wounds, Current<br />

Treatment – Outcomes<br />

Nov 23-<strong>24</strong> Belgrade Serbia<br />

2013<br />

Jan 20-22 Paris France<br />

23rd Conference of the European Wound Management Association <strong>May</strong> 15-17 Copenhagen Denmark<br />

For web addresses please visit www.ewma.org<br />

Organisations<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 73


Contact:<br />

Pam Landaiche<br />

pam@DFCon.com<br />

The next DFCon meeting<br />

is set for<br />

March 21-23, 2013,<br />

again at the<br />

Renaissance Hollywood<br />

Hotel in Los Angeles.<br />

For further information,<br />

visit www.DFCon.com.<br />

Diabetes and diabetic foot experts from around the<br />

globe met March 15-17, <strong>2012</strong>, at the tenth DFCon<br />

Global Diabetic Foot Conference in Los Angeles to<br />

share ideas on how to prevent lower limb amputations<br />

due to the complications of diabetes.<br />

10th DFCon<br />

Global Diabetic Foot Conference<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> President Jan Apelqvist receives Diabetic Foot Award<br />

<strong>2012</strong> Edward James Olmos Award for Advocacy in<br />

Amputation Prevention winner Jan Apelqvist, MD, PhD of<br />

Malmö, Sweden (seated9. Also pictured are (previous<br />

honorees and the actor for whom the award was named):<br />

Benjamin A. Lipsky, Peter R. Cavanagh, Gary W. Gibbons,<br />

Edward James Olmos; Karel Bakker, Andrew J.M. Boulton,<br />

Joseph L. Mills Sr., and conference co-chairman George<br />

Andros.<br />

Diabetic foot experts attend global meeting<br />

to share ideas on amputation prevention<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> is proud to announce that the <strong>EWMA</strong><br />

President, MD, PHD Jan Apelqvist, received the<br />

“<strong>2012</strong> Edward James Olmos Award for advocacy in<br />

amputation prevention” at the Diabetic Foot Global<br />

conference in Los Angeles 15-17 March <strong>2012</strong>.<br />

Motivating the choice of Jan Apelqvist as this years<br />

winner the conference co-chairs Dr. David G. Armstrong<br />

and George Andros said that: “Dr. Phd Jan<br />

Apelqvist Senior Consultant, Department of Endocrinology,<br />

Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden<br />

is one of the world’s most distinguished experts<br />

on the diabetic foot, diabetes- related complications<br />

and wound management, a noted researcher, a<br />

skilled clinician, a prolific author and a respected<br />

educator.”<br />

In his speech of thanks Dr. Jan Apelqvist stressed<br />

the role of the whole team from the Diabetic foot<br />

unit at the Endocrinological department in Lund<br />

and Malmö, Sweden. He also expressed his understanding<br />

of the value of the award as being not primarily<br />

the honoring of various experts – but rather<br />

the fact that the diabetic foot care gains attention<br />

through this award.<br />

Specialists from 39 U.S. states and 35 foreign<br />

countries attended DFCon <strong>2012</strong>.<br />

Portal Education broadcast educational<br />

sessions of the meeting live worldwide, and video<br />

of the education will be streamed on the DFCon<br />

website at www.DFCon.com.<br />

DFCon conference co-chairmen Drs. David G. Armstrong and George Andros lead a panel discussion on the opening day of DFCon <strong>2012</strong>.<br />

74<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2


AAWC<br />

Association for<br />

the Advancement<br />

of Wound Care<br />

Terry Treadwell, MD<br />

President, AAWC<br />

www.aawconline.org<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> international<br />

Partner Organisation<br />

The Association for<br />

the Advancement of Wound Care<br />

Greetings from your wound care colleagues at the<br />

Association for the Advancement of Wound Care,<br />

the AAWC, in the United States. This is an exciting<br />

time for us in that we are helping celebrate the<br />

25th Anniversary of the Symposium on Advanced<br />

Wound Care, our multidisciplinary wound care conference<br />

which is being held in Atlanta, Georgia,<br />

USA, this month. This conference has had a great<br />

impact in providing multi-specialty wound care education<br />

to practitioners in the United States.<br />

We know that education is indispensable for us to<br />

be able to help people with wounds. In an attempt<br />

to determine the educational needs of the healthcare<br />

providers practicing wound care, an exam asking<br />

basic questions about wound care was developed<br />

and given in selected areas around the United<br />

States in 2011 which one hundred ninety-five practitioners<br />

including nurses, physicians, physical therapists,<br />

and nurse practitioners took. Deficiencies<br />

were most apparent in the areas of wound infection,<br />

compression therapy, and diabetic foot ulcer<br />

management. It was very eye-opening to see the<br />

lack of knowledge of the people who take care of<br />

patients with wounds.<br />

It is obvious that we must strive to correct these<br />

educational deficiencies in our colleagues. In my<br />

last communication to you, I mentioned the<br />

AAWC’s involvement in providing web-based educational<br />

modules for our members. This program<br />

has been well received and is due for expansion this<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> 2013<br />

15 -17 <strong>May</strong> 2013<br />

year; however, it is obvious that many other types of<br />

educational programs must be developed and distributed<br />

to educate those who take care of patients<br />

with wounds.<br />

In addition to education, it is important for us to<br />

take advantage of opportunities to help wound care<br />

providers in countries with few resources. The Global<br />

Volunteers program of the AAWC directed by<br />

Dr. Tom Serena has been instrumental in sending<br />

volunteers to selected locations around the world to<br />

teach local healthcare providers the basics of good<br />

wound care. The program has recently added a site<br />

in Haiti where volunteers can visit, work, and teach<br />

in addition to our sites in India and Cambodia. This<br />

program is available to all of you who wish to volunteer<br />

and work with us.<br />

The AAWC has recently partnered with the Debra<br />

Foundation to provide assistance and support to<br />

patients and families suffering from epidermolysis<br />

bullosa. Involvement with this program will give our<br />

members a chance to share their knowledge to<br />

help patients with this terrible disease and to provide<br />

support to their families.<br />

We strive to accomplish both of these goals—to<br />

provide wound care education to wound care providers<br />

here and around the world and to serve<br />

wound patients and their families who will benefit<br />

from our knowledge and service. Won’t you join us<br />

in this project?<br />

Danish Wound<br />

Healing Society<br />

COPENHAGEN<br />

Denmark<br />

WWW.<strong>EWMA</strong>2013.ORG<br />

Organisations<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 75


Organisations<br />

AWMA<br />

The Australian<br />

Wound Management<br />

Association<br />

Dr Bill McGuiness<br />

President<br />

www.awma.com.au<br />

www.awma<strong>2012</strong>.com<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> international<br />

Partner Organisation<br />

76<br />

The Australian Wound Management<br />

Association national conference<br />

The Australian Wound Management Association<br />

(AWMA) national conference is held every two<br />

years in different capital cities in each state.<br />

The principal aim of the conference is to establish<br />

an agenda that the Association will prosecute over<br />

the next two years.<br />

The 9th conference was recently held at The Sydney<br />

Convention Centre using the theme “Harbouring<br />

Wound Care – integument, integrity and innovation”<br />

Some 700 delegates from seven different<br />

countries attended. It was the first national conference<br />

held since AWMA assumed a single national<br />

identify and logo. The aim to be recognised as a<br />

national peak body for wound care was established<br />

at the 2010 conference and culminated at the<br />

above conference with the launch of the new logo.<br />

More details can be found at our web site<br />

(www.awma.com.au).<br />

The scientific program for the <strong>2012</strong> conference<br />

(www.awma<strong>2012</strong>.com) was designed to focus on<br />

four integrated concepts:<br />

n Principles don’t’ change only resources<br />

n Resources are garnished by demonstrating<br />

efficacy via evidence<br />

n Ethical practitioners change patients situation by<br />

adopting best practice and lobbying government<br />

for resources<br />

n Wound care in 2020.<br />

On day one participants were reminded via a<br />

number of plenary and concurrent sessions that<br />

principles such as keeping the wound bed clean,<br />

maintaining a moist interface and controlling<br />

oedema were essential platforms for wound<br />

management. Recent research and innovations<br />

regarding the reduction of biofilms, lymphatic<br />

drainage and proteolytic indicators supported this<br />

theme. Maintaining the principles in resource poor<br />

countries was also visited by presentations from clinicians<br />

working with disadvantaged cohorts both<br />

internationally and within the Australasian context.<br />

Using evidence to garnish resources was a common<br />

theme on the second day of the conference. It built<br />

on the recent release of the Pan Pacific Pressure<br />

Injury Guidelines and the Australian and New<br />

Zealand Venous Leg Ulcer Guidelines in October<br />

2011. Plenary sessions by Dr Zena Moore, Prof<br />

David Leaper and Prof Keith Harding set the scene<br />

to explore a definition of evidence, the use of<br />

evidence in practice and research required in the<br />

future. It also encouraged participants to become<br />

active lobbyists to ensure that government provided<br />

required resources to implement best practice. To<br />

support this theme a preconference workshop was<br />

dedicated to the development of a consensus paper<br />

on conservative sharp debridement in the Australian<br />

context.<br />

The day also introduced the <strong>2012</strong> AWMA wound<br />

awareness campaign; “hop into compression”<br />

aimed at obtaining subsides for compression therapy.<br />

To strengthen the campaign AWMA is joining<br />

forces with the Australian Lymphology Association.<br />

The final day was devoted to future trends in wound<br />

care. Presentations about new research being<br />

undertaken by the Australian Wound Innovation<br />

CRC provided some exciting insights into new technologies<br />

and interventions on the horizon. New<br />

approaches to service delivery models and alternative<br />

models for education were also explored. The<br />

final session was dedicated to some crystal ball<br />

gazing and exploring the impacts on wound care in<br />

2020.<br />

In true Australian tradition the conference was not<br />

all work. Several social activities ensured that participants<br />

had the correct work-life balance. The dinner<br />

cruise also hosted the inaugural “AWMAs got<br />

talent contest” which is set to become a regular<br />

forum for state to state rivalry in the future.<br />

The AWMA <strong>2012</strong> to 2014 agenda is now set.<br />

Increasing awareness that wound management<br />

principals don’t change-only resources, effective<br />

lobbying for resources via the generation of new<br />

evidence and an active campaign to influence<br />

government, in particular for subsidised compression<br />

therapy.<br />

The next conference will be held at the Gold Coast,<br />

Queensland in 2014 so I would encourage all<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> members to joins us in the sun and set the<br />

AWMA agenda for 2014 to 2016.<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2


See the complete details online including continuing education statements,<br />

learning objectives, session descriptions, faculty credentials, information<br />

for submitting oral and poster abstracts, and registration information.<br />

2-K041


Organisations<br />

DEBRA<br />

International<br />

John Dart<br />

DEBRA House<br />

www.debra.org.uk<br />

www.debra-<br />

international.org<br />

debra@debra.org.uk<br />

or<br />

john.dart@debra.org.uk<br />

DEBRA International<br />

actively seeks collaboration<br />

with health care<br />

professionals and industry<br />

and would welcome<br />

contact with any <strong>EWMA</strong><br />

members who are<br />

interested in our work.<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> international<br />

Partner Organisation<br />

DEBRA International<br />

DEBRA International is the international association<br />

of epidermolysis bullosa (EB) patient support<br />

groups and, since the characteristic feature of EB is<br />

severe wounds that are frequently very hard to heal,<br />

the synergies with the work of <strong>EWMA</strong> are obvious.<br />

Consequently, we were delighted to be invited<br />

to become an International Partner Organisation<br />

and to have had the opportunity to present our<br />

clinical work at at the last two annual conferences<br />

and to have this chance to describe our current<br />

activities. The Centre of Expertise in Austria, the EB<br />

House in Salzburg, will be hosting a session on EB<br />

at the Vienna <strong>EWMA</strong> conference and there will be<br />

a DEBRA International stand in the exhibition area<br />

so we look forward to seeing many of you then.<br />

DEBRA International is currently working in over 40<br />

countries, through national EB patient groups, with<br />

strong representation in Europe, North and South<br />

America and Australasia and with a growing membership<br />

in Asia. The objectives of the organisation<br />

are to do together those things that are best<br />

achieved on a regional or world level and to assist<br />

member groups to do better those things that can<br />

only be done nationally and locally.<br />

Our current priority areas of work are:<br />

n funding and facilitating research to develop<br />

innovative treatments including gene, cell,<br />

protein and small molecule therapies; DEBRA<br />

International is unusual in that it has a single<br />

system of international peer review used by all of<br />

the National DEBRAs that fund research so that<br />

best use can be made of the € 3-5 M invested<br />

each year by member groups. A research<br />

planning conference is held every three years,<br />

involving the leading research teams worldwide,<br />

to identify opportunities and barriers to therapy<br />

development.<br />

n Identifying potential partners in industry and<br />

venture capital, whose involvement will be<br />

needed to successfully translate the promising<br />

work in a number of potential therapies from the<br />

laboratory into the clinic.<br />

n the generation of best clinical practice guidelines<br />

in various areas of importance to people with<br />

EB; a guideline on best practice in dental care<br />

has been completed and guidelines on cancer<br />

management, pain management, nutrition,<br />

physical therapies and wound care are in<br />

preparation.<br />

n the establishment of a clinical training programme<br />

for professionals interested in establishing,<br />

or improving, a specialist EB clinical service<br />

in their own countries, including an online,<br />

modular course coupled with mentoring.<br />

n creating stronger clinical networks of specialist<br />

EB centres to promote sharing of expertise and<br />

facilitate clinical trials<br />

n creating an international database of patients<br />

with EB to understand better the natural history<br />

of different types of EB and the costs of living<br />

with the condition.<br />

Submit your paper to <strong>EWMA</strong> Journal<br />

78<br />

Published by<br />

EUROPEAN<br />

WOUND MANAGEMENT<br />

ASSOCIATION<br />

www.ewma.org<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2


Journal of Tissue Viability<br />

Journal of Tissue Viability is a quarterly journal concerned<br />

with all aspects of the occurrence and treatment of wounds,<br />

ulcers and pressure sores including patient care, pain, nutrition,<br />

wound healing, research, prevention, mobility, social problems<br />

and management.<br />

The Journal particularly encourages papers covering skin and<br />

skin wounds but will consider articles that discuss injury in any<br />

tissue. Articles that stress the multi-professional nature of<br />

tissue viability are especially welcome. We seek to encourage<br />

new authors as well as well-established contributors to the fi<br />

eld - one aim of the journal is to enable all participants in tissue<br />

viability to share information with colleagues.<br />

We are excited to invite you to publish in Journal of Tissue<br />

Viability, an international, peer reviewed journal.<br />

For more information visit: www.journaloftissueviability.com<br />

TYPES OF PAPERS<br />

• Clinical Study<br />

• Basic Research Study<br />

• Case Report<br />

• Review Articles<br />

• Letters to the Editor<br />

ABSTRACTED & INDEXED IN:<br />

• BioInfoBank Library<br />

• Medline<br />

• PubMed<br />

• Science Direct<br />

• Scopus<br />

Call for Papers<br />

Submit your paper online now! http://ees.elsevier.com/jtv<br />

ISSN: 0965-206X<br />

Offi cial Journal of the Tissue Viability Society.<br />

Editor in Chief:<br />

D. Bader, Southampton, UK<br />

International editorial board:<br />

C. Dealey, UK<br />

L. Edsberg, USA<br />

A. Gefen, Israel<br />

S. Hagisawa, Japan<br />

A. Nelson, UK<br />

J. Nixon, UK<br />

H. Partsch, Austria<br />

M. Romanello, Italy<br />

L. Schoonhoven, Netherlands<br />

L. Stockton, UK<br />

J. Swaine, Australia<br />

T. Young, UK


EPUAP<br />

European<br />

Pressure Ulcer<br />

Advisory Panel<br />

Michael Clark<br />

President, EPUAP<br />

www.epuap.org<br />

80<br />

News from the<br />

European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel<br />

The European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel<br />

(EPUAP) will hold its 15th Annual Meeting in<br />

Cardiff, Wales over September 18th - 21st <strong>2012</strong>.<br />

The theme of this year’s meeting will be ‘Identifying<br />

research gaps and clinical needs in pressure ulcer<br />

prevention and management’.<br />

Who cares about pressure ulcers? – We do!’<br />

During the conference several areas will be<br />

explored including:<br />

n The new PUCLAS classification on line tool<br />

n Microclimate and moisture lesions<br />

n Incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD)<br />

n Pressure ulcer guideline implementation:<br />

clinical drivers versus financial drivers<br />

n International guideline adaptation<br />

– the Belgian, Netherlands & UK experience<br />

n Superficial versus deep infection in pressure<br />

ulcers, diagnosis and management<br />

n Pain and pressure ulcers<br />

Important new sections of the conference will provide<br />

an opportunity for <strong>EWMA</strong> and the EPUAP to<br />

collaborate together upon a joint session. The<br />

conference will close with a live link to the Cardiff<br />

Complex Wound Clinic when delegates will be able<br />

to interact with complex wound management in<br />

action.<br />

Cardiff has been chosen as the venue for the<br />

EPUAP <strong>2012</strong> conference venue for two main reasons<br />

– the first President of the EPUAP, Professor<br />

Keith Harding has been based in Cardiff throughout<br />

the majority of his professional life in wound<br />

healing and it was fitting on our 15th anniversary to<br />

visit the city where many development and initiatives<br />

in wound management began. Secondly there<br />

is vibrant research, clinical and commercial activity<br />

in Wales related to pressure ulcers and wider<br />

wound healing with the Welsh Government recognising<br />

wound healing as a major success in the<br />

country’s bio-science activities. So the <strong>2012</strong> EPUAP<br />

conference is coming to a city that has been long<br />

associated with the EPUAP and will help contribute<br />

to the growing awareness of wounds as a strength<br />

of Wales.<br />

One topic that will be discussed during the Cardiff<br />

conference is the EPUAP’s role in promoting a Stop<br />

Pressure Ulcer Day across Europe. In recent years<br />

we have seen ’Stop Pressure Ulcer’ Days occurring<br />

in Spanish and Portuguese speaking countries and<br />

last year organisations in Europe and Latin America<br />

created a Declaration in Rio speaking out against<br />

people developing pressure ulcers (www.silauhe.<br />

org/es/?file=kop1.php).<br />

In <strong>2012</strong> there will again be a Stop Pressure Ulcer<br />

Day to be held on November 16th <strong>2012</strong>. The European<br />

Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel applauds the<br />

efforts of such events to bring pressure ulcers to the<br />

public, the professionals and our politicians and has<br />

decided to participate in this even in <strong>2012</strong>. During<br />

the Cardiff <strong>2012</strong> conference there will be a meeting<br />

with other interested wound organisations to help<br />

co-ordinate the Stop Pressure Ulcer Day. Let’s take<br />

the opportunity to remind colleagues, the public<br />

and our politicians about the need to reduce the<br />

burden of pressure ulcers across Europe.<br />

To find more information on the project<br />

please visit the website:<br />

www.epuap.org/news/stop-pressure-ulcer-day/<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2


Latin American Activities on Prevention of Pressure Ulcers<br />

Last October, the executive of the Ibero Latin-American Society<br />

for Ulcers and Wounds (Sociedad Iberolatinoamericana<br />

sobre Úlceras y Heridas, SILAUHE) gave a “green light” to<br />

two projects, both directly related to the Prevention of Pressure<br />

Ulcers:<br />

Firstly, the “Declaration of Rio de Janeiro”, requires, as a<br />

universal right of all people, prevention of these episodes and<br />

discussion of the lines of action to undertake.<br />

Secondly, the announcement of a “World Day for Prevention<br />

of Pressure Ulcers”, scheduled for next November<br />

16th. On this topic, SILAUHE would like to invite all scientific<br />

organizations and Health Care Officials from Latin America<br />

and Europe, to adopt this event as yours, as formal recognition<br />

that the problem of Pressure Ulcers is evident and<br />

important as regards the implications for the quality of life of<br />

Organisations<br />

people who suffer from ulcers, the increased risk of morbidmortality<br />

and the high economic impact on society; and in<br />

particular, to bring to everyone’s attention that today it is<br />

possible, with the right treatment, to prevent almost all cases.<br />

It is hoped that these two projects have resonance and<br />

impact on the first World Prevention of Pressure Ulcers Day,<br />

and we hope that, in the future, we will have many more<br />

issues and projects and that many national and international<br />

organizations in the field of health and human rights, scientific<br />

societies and society as a whole will participate as partners<br />

or stakeholders in the fight against pressure ulcers.<br />

Written by Jose Verdú Soriano,<br />

on the executive of GNEAUPP, trustee at EPUAP and<br />

a member of <strong>EWMA</strong> Council<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 81


Cooperating Organisations<br />

AFIScep.be<br />

French Nurses’ Association in Stoma Therapy,<br />

Wound Healing and Wounds<br />

www.afiscep.be<br />

AISLeC<br />

Italian Nurses’ Cutaneous Wounds Association<br />

www.aislec.it<br />

AIUC<br />

Italian Association for the study of Cutaneous Ulcers<br />

www.aiuc.it<br />

APTFeridas<br />

Portuguese Association for the Treatment of Wounds<br />

www.aptferidas.com<br />

AWA<br />

Austrian Wound Association<br />

www.a-w-a.at<br />

BEFEWO<br />

Belgian Federation of Woundcare<br />

www.befewo.org<br />

BWA<br />

Bulgarian Wound Association<br />

www.woundbulgaria.org<br />

CNC<br />

Clinical Nursing Consulting – Wondzorg<br />

www.wondzorg.be<br />

CSLR<br />

Czech Wound Management Society<br />

www.cslr.cz<br />

CWA<br />

Croatian Wound Association<br />

www.huzr.hr<br />

DGfW<br />

German Wound Healing Society<br />

www.dgfw.de<br />

Associated Organisations<br />

Leg Club<br />

Lindsay Leg Club Foundation<br />

www.legclub.org<br />

LSN<br />

The Lymphoedema<br />

Support Network<br />

www.lymphoedema.org/lsn<br />

For more information about<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong>’s Cooperating Organisations<br />

please visit www.ewma.org<br />

82<br />

Danish Wound DSFS<br />

Healing Society Danish Wound Healing Society<br />

www.saar.dk<br />

FWCS<br />

Finnish Wound Care Society<br />

www.suomenhaavanhoitoyhdistys.fi<br />

GAIF<br />

Associated Group of Research in Wounds<br />

www.gaif.net<br />

GNEAUPP<br />

National Advisory Group for the Study of Pressure<br />

Ulcers and Chronic Wounds<br />

www.gneaupp.org<br />

ICW<br />

Chronic Wounds Initiative<br />

www.ic-wunden.de<br />

LBAA<br />

Latvian Wound Treating Organisation<br />

LUF<br />

The Leg Ulcer Forum<br />

www.legulcerforum.org<br />

LWMA<br />

Lithuanian Wound Management Association<br />

www.lzga.lt<br />

MASC<br />

Maltese Association of Skin and Wound Care<br />

www.mwcf.madv.org.mt/<br />

MSKT<br />

Hungarian Wound Care Society<br />

www.euuzlet.hu/mskt/<br />

International Partner Organisations<br />

AWMA<br />

Australian Wound Management<br />

Association<br />

www.awma.com.au<br />

AAWC<br />

Association for the Advancement<br />

of Wound Care<br />

www.aawconline.org<br />

Debra International<br />

Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa<br />

Research Association<br />

www.debra.org.uk<br />

EFORT<br />

European Federation of National<br />

Associations of Orthopaedics<br />

and Traumatology<br />

www.efort.org<br />

MWMA<br />

Macedonian Wound Management Association<br />

ILF<br />

International Lymphoedema<br />

Framework<br />

www.lympho.org<br />

NZWCS<br />

New Zealand Wound Care<br />

Society<br />

www.nzwcs.org.nz<br />

SOBENFeE<br />

Brazilian Wound<br />

Management Association<br />

www.sobenfee.org.br<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2


Other Collaborators<br />

NATVNS<br />

National Association of Tissue Viability Nurses,<br />

Scotland<br />

NIFS<br />

Norwegian Wound Healing Association<br />

www.nifs-saar.no<br />

NOVW<br />

Dutch Organisation of Wound Care Nurses<br />

www.novw.org<br />

PWMA<br />

Polish Wound Management Association<br />

www.ptlr.pl<br />

SAfW<br />

Swiss Association for Wound Care (German section)<br />

www.safw.ch<br />

SAfW<br />

Swiss Association for Wound Care (French section)<br />

www.safw-romande.ch<br />

SAWMA<br />

Serbian Advanced Wound Management Association<br />

www.lecenjerana.com<br />

SEBINKO<br />

Hungarian Association for the Improvement in Care<br />

of Chronic Wounds and Incontinentia<br />

www.sebinko.hu<br />

SEHER<br />

The Spanish Society of Wounds<br />

www.sociedadespanolaheridas.es<br />

SFFPC<br />

The French and Francophone Society<br />

f Wounds and Wound Healing<br />

www.sffpc.org<br />

SSiS<br />

Swedish Wound Care Nurses Association<br />

www.sarsjukskoterskor.se<br />

SSOOR<br />

Slovak Wound Care Association<br />

www.ssoor.sk<br />

DFSG<br />

Diabetic Foot Study Group<br />

www.dfsg.org<br />

EADV<br />

European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology<br />

www.eadv.org<br />

EBA<br />

European Burns Association<br />

www.euroburn.org<br />

EPUAP<br />

European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel<br />

www.epuap.org<br />

E T R S ETRS<br />

European Tissue Repair Society<br />

www.etrs.org<br />

STW Belarus<br />

Society for the Treatment of Wounds<br />

(Gomel, Belarus)<br />

www.burnplast.gomel.by<br />

SUMS<br />

Icelandic Wound Healing Society<br />

www.sums-is.org<br />

SWHS<br />

Serbian Wound Healing Society<br />

www.lecenjerana.com<br />

SWHS<br />

Swedish Wound Healing Society<br />

www.sarlakning.se<br />

TVS<br />

Tissue Viability Society<br />

www.tvs.org.uk<br />

URuBiH<br />

Association for Wound Management<br />

of Bosnia and Herzegovina<br />

www.urubih.ba<br />

UWTO<br />

Ukrainian Wound Treatment Organisation<br />

www.uwto.org.ua<br />

V&VN<br />

Decubitus and Wound Consultants, Netherlands<br />

www.venvn.nl<br />

WMAI<br />

Wound Management Association of Ireland<br />

www.wmai.ie<br />

WMAK<br />

Wound Management Association of Kosova<br />

WMAS<br />

Wound Management Association Slovenia<br />

www.dors.si<br />

WMAT<br />

Wound Management Association Turkey<br />

www.yaradernegi.net<br />

Organisations<br />

Eucomed<br />

Eucomed Advanced Wound Care Sector Group<br />

www.eucomed.org<br />

ICC<br />

International Compression Club<br />

www.icc-compressionclub.com<br />

MSF<br />

Médecins Sans Frontières<br />

www.msf.org<br />

WAWLC<br />

World Alliance for Wound and Lymphedema Care<br />

www.wawlc.org<br />

WUWHS<br />

The World Union of Wound Healing Societies<br />

www.wuwhs.org<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal <strong>2012</strong> vol 12 no 2 83


5 Editorial<br />

Science, Practice and Education<br />

7 A structured approach to surgical treatment in deep<br />

infection in diabetic foot<br />

Cedomir S Vucetic, Javorka B Delic, Zoran S Vukasinovic,<br />

Goran Dz Tulic, Ivan K Dimitrijevic, Cedo Dj Vuckovic,<br />

Vesna K Kalezic<br />

15 Endothelial progenitor cells, a unipotent stem cell, involved<br />

in neovascularization of wound healing in diabetic foot ulcer<br />

Jacqueline Chor Wing Tama, Chun Hay Ko, Ping Chung Leung,<br />

Kwok Pui Fung, Clara Bik San Lau<br />

23 Bacteriophages for the treatment of severe infections:<br />

– a ‘new’ option for the future?<br />

Daniel De Vos, Gilbert Verbeken, Thomas Rose, Serge Jennes, Jean-<br />

Paul Pirnay<br />

31 Developing evidence-based ways of working:<br />

– Employing interdisciplinary team working to improve patient<br />

outcomes in diabetic foot ulceration – our experience<br />

Kristien Van Acker<br />

36 Exploring the characteristics of a venous leg ulcer that contribute<br />

to the emotional distress experienced by patients<br />

Jessica Walburn, John Weinman, Suzanne Scott, Kavita Vedhara<br />

39 Development of a wound healing index for chronic wounds<br />

Juan Carlos Restrepo-Medrano, José Verdú Soriano<br />

Cochrane Reviews<br />

49 Abstracts of Recent Cochrane Reviews<br />

Sally Bell-Syer<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong><br />

56 <strong>EWMA</strong> Journal Previous Issues and other Journals<br />

58 <strong>EWMA</strong> Teacher network<br />

Zena Moore<br />

58 Austrian Diabetic Foot Symposium, <strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

60 <strong>EWMA</strong> Update, The Patient Outcome Group<br />

Patricia Price<br />

62 We want to make a difference! – <strong>EWMA</strong> future projects<br />

Jan Apelqvist<br />

64 EU ‘Week For Life’<br />

Jan Apelqvist<br />

66 <strong>EWMA</strong> focus on multidisciplinarity in wound management<br />

Jan Apelqvist<br />

68 <strong>EWMA</strong> participation in EU Conference on Antimicrobials<br />

Resistance – it’s time to take joint action!<br />

Rytis Rimdeika<br />

70 Eucomed, Woundcare reflections on the EU 2020 strategy<br />

Hans Lundgren<br />

Organisations<br />

72 <strong>EWMA</strong> Corporate Sponsors<br />

73 Conference Calendar<br />

74 10th DFCon Global Diabetic Foot Conference.<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> President Jan Apelqvist receives Diabetic Foot Award.<br />

Diabetic Foot Experts Attend Global Meeting to Share Ideas<br />

on Amputation Prevention<br />

75 AAWC, The Association for the Advancement of<br />

Wound Care<br />

Terry Treadwell<br />

76 AWMA, The Australian Wound Management Association<br />

national conference<br />

Bill McGuiness<br />

78 DEBRA International<br />

John Dart<br />

80 EPUAP, News from the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory<br />

Panel – Latin American Activities on Prevention of Pressure<br />

Ulcers<br />

Michael Clark<br />

82 <strong>EWMA</strong> Cooperating Organisations

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!