28.01.2013 Views

The Chartered Accountant

The Chartered Accountant

The Chartered Accountant

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A. Facts of the Case<br />

1. A private limited company manufactures<br />

nickel sheets using the electroforming<br />

process. <strong>The</strong> key plant<br />

and machinery for the manufacturing<br />

process is an electroplating tank<br />

consisting of:<br />

(i) Pure nickel in pellet form,<br />

and<br />

(ii) Nickel Sulphamate Solution.<br />

2. <strong>The</strong> principle of operation is that<br />

of electroplating. In electroplating,<br />

there are two electrodes dipped in<br />

an electrolyte solution (Nickel Sulphamate<br />

solution). <strong>The</strong>y are given<br />

opposite electric charges; the electrode<br />

having positive charge is called<br />

Anode and the one having negative<br />

charge is called Cathode. When the<br />

electric charge is applied, Anode<br />

dissolves in the electrolyte and the<br />

metal that has dissolved gets deposited<br />

on the Cathode. <strong>The</strong> Anode<br />

consists of a perforated titanium<br />

basket filled with the nickel pellets.<br />

<strong>The</strong> nickel in the basket dissolves in<br />

the nickel sulphamate solution. <strong>The</strong><br />

Cathode consists of a metal sheet.<br />

<strong>The</strong> nickel that dissolves from the<br />

Anode gets deposited on the Cathode,<br />

thus the product is ready. In the<br />

normal course of operation, whatever<br />

nickel is taken away from the<br />

Anode is replenished by way of addition<br />

of fresh nickel pellets.<br />

3. To get the production started and<br />

then to maintain the desired quality<br />

of product, it is absolutely essential<br />

that the quantity of nickel in the<br />

Anodes as well as the quantity and<br />

concentration of nickel sulphamate<br />

DECEMBER 2008 976 THE CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT<br />

OPINION<br />

Treatment of initial quantity of<br />

in-process material.<br />

<strong>The</strong> following is the opinion given by the Expert Advisory Committee of the Institute in response<br />

to a query sent by a member. This is being published for the information of readers.<br />

solution be maintained as per the<br />

standards. Unless nickel and nickel<br />

sulphamate solution is added to the<br />

tank the same cannot be put to use.<br />

4. In short, according to the querist,<br />

the quantity of initial nickel and<br />

nickel sulphamate solution that is<br />

put inside a tank stays for the entire<br />

operational life of the tank. Hence,<br />

the cost of initial nickel and nickel<br />

sulphamate solution is treated as<br />

capital cost for the purpose of obtaining<br />

term loan for buying six new<br />

tanks in the financial year 2007-08.<br />

Besides the six new tanks added in<br />

the financial year 2007-08, the company<br />

has twelve old tanks where<br />

the cost of initial nickel and nickel<br />

sulphamate solution has not been<br />

considered as capital cost and the<br />

balance stock in the tanks as on the<br />

balance sheet date is shown as workin-progress.<br />

As per the querist, this<br />

being major addition, management<br />

of the company felt it necessary to<br />

ascertain as to whether capitalisation<br />

of cost of initial nickel and nickel<br />

sulphamate solution is proper.<br />

B. Query<br />

5. <strong>The</strong> querist has sought the opinion<br />

of the Expert Advisory Committee<br />

on the following issues:<br />

(i) Whether the accounting treatment<br />

given by the company<br />

to treat the cost of nickel and<br />

nickel sulphamate solution in<br />

the six new tanks, acquired in<br />

the financial year 2007-08, as<br />

capital expenditure is correct.<br />

(ii) In case the answer to the<br />

above question is in the af-<br />

firmative, then whether it is<br />

necessary to declare the same<br />

as a change in the accounting<br />

policy for fixed assets, since<br />

nickel and nickel sulphamate<br />

solution in earlier tanks has<br />

not been capitalised.<br />

(iii) In case the answer to (i) above<br />

is in the affirmative whether<br />

it is possible to transfer the<br />

work-in-progress (WIP) to<br />

capital asset in respect of earlier<br />

12 tanks in the financial<br />

year 2007-08. This, according<br />

to the querist, will be done by<br />

transferring WIP to fixed assets.<br />

If it is possible, the following<br />

questions arise:<br />

(a) At which price transfer<br />

from WIP to Fixed assets<br />

should be made, whether<br />

at today’s price (carrying<br />

cost) or the price at which<br />

it was originally purchased,<br />

i.e., 1998 price.<br />

(b) Whether depreciation<br />

from the date of capitalisation<br />

(1998) to date<br />

should be considered.<br />

(c) If WIP is transferred at<br />

1998 price, what treatment<br />

should be given<br />

for the balancing amount<br />

(difference between the<br />

present WIP value and<br />

1998 price).<br />

(iv) Whether the company can<br />

adopt dual accounting policy,<br />

i.e., continue to show the<br />

nickel and nickel sulphamate<br />

solution in the earlier 12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!