28.01.2013 Views

news round up - Taxmann

news round up - Taxmann

news round up - Taxmann

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

218 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Reports [Vol. 1<br />

vehicle reduced by the value of the customer’s old vehicle fixed by the<br />

broker. The old vehicle was delivered by the customer then and there and<br />

the broker took over the possession of the same with the documents.<br />

According to the assessee, the broker later sold the old vehicles delivered<br />

by the customers and remitted the value earlier fixed to the assessee with<br />

which the entire price of the new vehicles sold to the customers got paid.<br />

Even though, old two wheelers were purchased from customers and<br />

resold later by the assessee and the broker in tantum, neither the assessee<br />

nor the broker conceded any purchase and sale of old vehicles. In view of<br />

the non-payment of tax on the sale of old vehicles, the Intelligence Officer<br />

levied penalty for evasion of tax under section 67(1). The first appeal<br />

having failed, the assessee approached the Tribunal with second appeal<br />

and the Tribunal, though confirmed the penalty yet reduced the quantum<br />

to equal amount of tax as against double the amount levied and sustained<br />

in the first appeal.<br />

On appeal :<br />

HELD<br />

The first question to be considered was whether the exchange mela<br />

involving taking of old vehicle from the customer and replacement of the<br />

same with a new one involved purchase of the old vehicle from the<br />

customer. It was the admitted position that on the customer’s bringing the<br />

old vehicle, its value was fixed by the broker and it was <strong>up</strong> to the customer<br />

to accept the value or reject the same. If the customer accepted the value<br />

offered by the broker, then he surrendered the old vehicle along with<br />

papers and purchased a new one from the assessee by remitting the value<br />

of the new two wheeler, reduced by the value fixed for the old one by the<br />

broker. Once this transaction or exchange was finalised, then the assessee<br />

had no right to claim the balance sale consideration of the new vehicle sold<br />

to the customer irrespective of whether the value of the old vehicle fixed by<br />

the broker was realised by sale of the old vehicle surrendered by the<br />

customer or not. In other words, there was clear sale of the old vehicle by<br />

the customer by delivering the possession of the same along with its<br />

registration certificate and transfer documents in terms of the Motor<br />

Vehicles Rules. The consideration paid to him was by way of adjustment of<br />

the purchase value of the old vehicle, towards the sale price of the new<br />

vehicle. It was the conceded position that the assessee treated the sale of the<br />

new vehicle under the exchange scheme as full and complete with no debit<br />

balance of price in the customer’s account. Therefore, purchase of old<br />

vehicle from the customer was complete when new vehicle was sold to him<br />

by recovering its value reduced by the cost of the old vehicle taken over from<br />

the customer. [Para 3]<br />

The next question to be considered was as to whether the assessee<br />

purchased old vehicle or whether it was the broker who had purchased the<br />

old vehicle. The terms of arrangement between the assessee and the broker<br />

for purchase and sale of the old vehicle were not disclosed to the depart-<br />

GOODS & SERVICES TAX CASES ❑ JANUARY 20 - FEBRUARY 4, 2010 ◆ 94<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

E<br />

F<br />

G

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!