news round up - Taxmann
news round up - Taxmann news round up - Taxmann
210 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Reports [Vol. 1 [2010] 1 GST 210 (KAR.) HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA Tropical Flavours (P.) Ltd. v. State of Karnataka* K.L. MANJUNATH AND ARAVIND KUMAR, JJ. STA NO. 20 OF 2006 DECEMBER 10, 2009 CLASSIFICATION OF GOODS - Chillies - Assessee was engaged in extraction of chilly oleoresin from dry chillies - Whether cut chillies, spent chillies, crushed chillies and chilly seeds remaining after extraction of chilly oleoresin from dry chillies is a spice by itself, which can be sold and traded in common parlance - Held, yes - Whether, therefore, above goods would fall under entry No. 61 of Third Schedule to Act under definition of ‘dry chillies’ - Held, yes [Section 4 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003] FACTS The assessee was engaged in extraction of chilly oleoresin from dry chillies. It submitted an application before the advance ruling authority for clarification on the rate of tax applicable to the cut chillies, spent chillies, crushed chillies and chilly seeds remaining after extraction of chilly oleoresin from dry chillies. The said authority held that the above goods having not been included in entry No. 61 of the Third Schedule to the Act, which reads as : ‘Spices in all forms including jeera, ...... and dry chillies’, the said goods would attract tax at the rate of 12.5 per cent under section 4(1)(b) for the period from 1-4-2005 to 31-3-2006 inasmuch as the residuary clause was applicable to the goods in question and with effect from 1-4-2006, the above goods were eligible to be taxed at the rate of 4 per cent in view of entry No. 89 of the Third Schedule to the Act, which reads as : ‘Spices in all forms including jeera, ......... tamarind and dry chillies including cut chillies, spent chillies and chilly seeds, but excluding ....’. The Third Schedule to the Act was substituted by the new Schedule with effect from 1-4-2006 and the spices were specified at serial No. 89. On appeal to the High Court : HELD In entry No. 61 of the Third Schedule to the Act, spices in all forms including the dry chillies find a place. The Legislature in its wisdom having intro- *In favour of assessee. GOODS & SERVICES TAX CASES ❑ JANUARY 20 - FEBRUARY 4, 2010 ◆ 86 A B C D E F G
2010] Tropical Flavours (P.) Ltd. v. State of Karnataka (Kar.) 211 A B C D E F G duced by incorporating serial No. 89 by the Amendment Act, 2006, enlarged the scope of the dry chillies by bringing within the ambit of said dry chillies, the cut chillies, spent chillies and chilly seeds. [Para 10] The process carried out for extraction of oleoresin results in the parts of dry chilly and in trade parlance, it is called as skinned/cut chilly or crushed chilly or spent chilly. The crushed chilly consists of stem, a part of the skin and the chilly seeds. This extracted chilly can be used as a product, was not disputed by the revenue. The only ground on which the revenue was attempting to contend, that the reminiscence of the extracted chilly would attract the residuary clause, was by virtue of non-inclusion of these products, viz., cut chilly, crushed chilly, and spent chilly in entry No. 61 for the relevant period. When the said product can be sold as such in the market and it is accepted as such in common trade parlance, only by virtue of its non-inclusion in the entry at serial No. 61, it cannot be held that residuary clause gets attracted. [Para 11] Admittedly, the process carried out in extraction of oleoresin, the reminiscence that would follow are, cut chilly, crushed chilly and spent chilly and it is sold as a separate commodity and accepted both in trade and common parlance and it does not lose its identity by virtue of such extraction process. Hence, the originality of such commodity remains as such. [Para 12] Further, by the subsequent amendment brought about to entry No. 89, the Legislature in its wisdom has included crushed chilly, cut chilly and spent chilly by adding the same after the words ‘dry chillies’. Hence, the advance ruling authority was in error in holding that the residuary clause, viz., section 4(1)(b) was applicable to the instant case, viz., the commodity in question was liable to tax at 12.5 per cent for the period 1-4-2005 to 31-3- 2006. [Para 13] Therefore, the crushed chillies, cut chillies, spent chillies and chilly seeds is a spice by itself, which can be sold and traded in common parlance and, accordingly, tax leviable would be at the rate of 4 per cent and it would come within entry No. 61 of the Third Schedule to the Act under the definition of ‘dry chillies’. Therefore, the advance ruling authority was not justified in its view. [Para 14] CASE REVIEW Habeeb Proteins & Fats Extracts v. CCT 2005 (58) Kar. L.J. 155 (para 7) followed. CASE REFERRED TO Habeeb Proteins & Fats Extracts v. CCT 2005 (58) Kar. L.J. 155 (para 7). G. Rabinathan for the Applicant. Vedamurthy for the Respondent. JUDGMENT 1. The assessee is questioning the correctness and legality of the order passed by the Authority for clarifications and Advance Ruling in order No. AR.CLR. 436/2005-06, dated 18-4-2006 under section 16 of the GOODS & SERVICES TAX CASES ❑ JANUARY 20 - FEBRUARY 4, 2010 ◆ 87
- Page 36 and 37: 126 GOODS & SERVICES TAX - MAGAZINE
- Page 38 and 39: 128 GOODS & SERVICES TAX - MAGAZINE
- Page 40 and 41: 130 GOODS & SERVICES TAX - MAGAZINE
- Page 42 and 43: 132 GOODS & SERVICES TAX - MAGAZINE
- Page 44 and 45: 134 GOODS & SERVICES TAX - MAGAZINE
- Page 46 and 47: 136 GOODS & SERVICES TAX - MAGAZINE
- Page 48 and 49: 138 GOODS & SERVICES TAX - MAGAZINE
- Page 50 and 51: 174 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 52 and 53: 176 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 54 and 55: 178 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 56 and 57: 180 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 58 and 59: 182 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 60 and 61: 184 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 62 and 63: 186 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 64 and 65: 188 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 66 and 67: 190 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 68 and 69: 192 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 70 and 71: 194 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 72 and 73: 196 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 74 and 75: 198 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 76 and 77: 200 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 78 and 79: 202 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 80 and 81: 204 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 82 and 83: 206 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 84 and 85: 208 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 88 and 89: 212 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 90 and 91: 214 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 92 and 93: 216 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 94 and 95: 218 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 96 and 97: 220 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 98 and 99: 222 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 100 and 101: 224 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 102 and 103: 226 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 104 and 105: 228 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 106 and 107: 230 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 108 and 109: 232 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 110 and 111: 234 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 112 and 113: 236 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 114 and 115: 238 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 116 and 117: 240 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 118 and 119: 242 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 120 and 121: 244 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 122 and 123: 246 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 124 and 125: 248 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 126 and 127: 250 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 128 and 129: 252 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 130 and 131: 254 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 132 and 133: 256 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
- Page 134 and 135: 258 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Re
210 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Reports [Vol. 1<br />
[2010] 1 GST 210 (KAR.)<br />
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA<br />
Tropical Flavours (P.) Ltd.<br />
v.<br />
State of Karnataka*<br />
K.L. MANJUNATH AND ARAVIND KUMAR, JJ.<br />
STA NO. 20 OF 2006<br />
DECEMBER 10, 2009<br />
CLASSIFICATION OF GOODS - Chillies - Assessee was engaged in extraction<br />
of chilly oleoresin from dry chillies - Whether cut chillies, spent<br />
chillies, crushed chillies and chilly seeds remaining after extraction of<br />
chilly oleoresin from dry chillies is a spice by itself, which can be sold and<br />
traded in common parlance - Held, yes - Whether, therefore, above<br />
goods would fall under entry No. 61 of Third Schedule to Act under<br />
definition of ‘dry chillies’ - Held, yes [Section 4 of the Karnataka Value<br />
Added Tax Act, 2003]<br />
FACTS<br />
The assessee was engaged in extraction of chilly oleoresin from dry<br />
chillies. It submitted an application before the advance ruling authority<br />
for clarification on the rate of tax applicable to the cut chillies, spent<br />
chillies, crushed chillies and chilly seeds remaining after extraction of<br />
chilly oleoresin from dry chillies. The said authority held that the above<br />
goods having not been included in entry No. 61 of the Third Schedule to<br />
the Act, which reads as : ‘Spices in all forms including jeera, ...... and dry<br />
chillies’, the said goods would attract tax at the rate of 12.5 per cent under<br />
section 4(1)(b) for the period from 1-4-2005 to 31-3-2006 inasmuch as the<br />
residuary clause was applicable to the goods in question and with effect<br />
from 1-4-2006, the above goods were eligible to be taxed at the rate of 4 per<br />
cent in view of entry No. 89 of the Third Schedule to the Act, which reads<br />
as : ‘Spices in all forms including jeera, ......... tamarind and dry chillies<br />
including cut chillies, spent chillies and chilly seeds, but excluding ....’. The<br />
Third Schedule to the Act was substituted by the new Schedule with effect<br />
from 1-4-2006 and the spices were specified at serial No. 89.<br />
On appeal to the High Court :<br />
HELD<br />
In entry No. 61 of the Third Schedule to the Act, spices in all forms including<br />
the dry chillies find a place. The Legislature in its wisdom having intro-<br />
*In favour of assessee.<br />
GOODS & SERVICES TAX CASES ❑ JANUARY 20 - FEBRUARY 4, 2010 ◆ 86<br />
A<br />
B<br />
C<br />
D<br />
E<br />
F<br />
G