28.01.2013 Views

news round up - Taxmann

news round up - Taxmann

news round up - Taxmann

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

244 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Reports [Vol. 1<br />

[2010] 1 GST 244 (MP)<br />

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH<br />

Rajesh Electricals*<br />

v.<br />

Registrar<br />

MS. S.R. WAGHMARE AND R.S. GARG, JJ.<br />

WRIT PETITION NO. 7570 OF 2008<br />

OCTOBER 27, 2009<br />

PENALTY - Imposition of penalty in certain circumstances - Assessing<br />

Officer held that tax on sale of starters and switches was payable at rate<br />

of 12 per cent and not at rate of 3 per cent as paid by assessee - He,<br />

accordingly, held return filed by assessee to be a false return and directed<br />

recovery of tax at rate of 12 per cent and also imposed penalty <strong>up</strong>on<br />

assessee - Board held that tax on impugned sale was payable at rate of<br />

3 per cent - Whether once tax rate was held by Board to be 3 per cent,<br />

then return filed by assessee could not be held to be false, wrong or bad<br />

- Held, yes - Whether, therefore, penalty imposed <strong>up</strong>on assessee was<br />

liable to be set aside - Held, yes [Section 69 of the Madhya Pradesh<br />

Vanijyik Kar Adhiniyam, 1994]<br />

FACTS<br />

The assessee was dealing in electrical goods and pumping sets. It deposited<br />

tax on the sale of starters and switches at the rate of 3 per cent. The<br />

Assessing Officer held that tax on the impugned sale was payable at the<br />

rate of 12 per cent and not at the rate of 3 per cent. He, accordingly, held<br />

the return filed by the assessee to be a false return and directed recovery<br />

of tax at the rate of 12 per cent and also imposed penalty <strong>up</strong>on the assessee.<br />

However, the Appellate Board agreeing with the assessee held that the<br />

order passed by the Assessing Officer was bad; and that tax on the<br />

impugned sale was payable at the rate of 3 per cent only. The assessee<br />

thereafter made an application under section 71 with a submission that<br />

the question relating to penalty had not been decided though was raised,<br />

therefore, the same be also decided. The Board rejected the said application<br />

holding that the question was not raised before it, therefore, the<br />

application under section 71 was not maintainable.<br />

On writ :<br />

*In favour of assessee.<br />

GOODS & SERVICES TAX CASES ❑ JANUARY 20 - FEBRUARY 4, 2010 ◆ 120<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

E<br />

F<br />

G

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!