news round up - Taxmann
news round up - Taxmann
news round up - Taxmann
- TAGS
- news
- round
- taxmann
- taxmann.com
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
244 Goods & Services Tax Cases - Reports [Vol. 1<br />
[2010] 1 GST 244 (MP)<br />
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH<br />
Rajesh Electricals*<br />
v.<br />
Registrar<br />
MS. S.R. WAGHMARE AND R.S. GARG, JJ.<br />
WRIT PETITION NO. 7570 OF 2008<br />
OCTOBER 27, 2009<br />
PENALTY - Imposition of penalty in certain circumstances - Assessing<br />
Officer held that tax on sale of starters and switches was payable at rate<br />
of 12 per cent and not at rate of 3 per cent as paid by assessee - He,<br />
accordingly, held return filed by assessee to be a false return and directed<br />
recovery of tax at rate of 12 per cent and also imposed penalty <strong>up</strong>on<br />
assessee - Board held that tax on impugned sale was payable at rate of<br />
3 per cent - Whether once tax rate was held by Board to be 3 per cent,<br />
then return filed by assessee could not be held to be false, wrong or bad<br />
- Held, yes - Whether, therefore, penalty imposed <strong>up</strong>on assessee was<br />
liable to be set aside - Held, yes [Section 69 of the Madhya Pradesh<br />
Vanijyik Kar Adhiniyam, 1994]<br />
FACTS<br />
The assessee was dealing in electrical goods and pumping sets. It deposited<br />
tax on the sale of starters and switches at the rate of 3 per cent. The<br />
Assessing Officer held that tax on the impugned sale was payable at the<br />
rate of 12 per cent and not at the rate of 3 per cent. He, accordingly, held<br />
the return filed by the assessee to be a false return and directed recovery<br />
of tax at the rate of 12 per cent and also imposed penalty <strong>up</strong>on the assessee.<br />
However, the Appellate Board agreeing with the assessee held that the<br />
order passed by the Assessing Officer was bad; and that tax on the<br />
impugned sale was payable at the rate of 3 per cent only. The assessee<br />
thereafter made an application under section 71 with a submission that<br />
the question relating to penalty had not been decided though was raised,<br />
therefore, the same be also decided. The Board rejected the said application<br />
holding that the question was not raised before it, therefore, the<br />
application under section 71 was not maintainable.<br />
On writ :<br />
*In favour of assessee.<br />
GOODS & SERVICES TAX CASES ❑ JANUARY 20 - FEBRUARY 4, 2010 ◆ 120<br />
A<br />
B<br />
C<br />
D<br />
E<br />
F<br />
G