Critique and sensitivity analysis of the compensation function used ...

3 5
REFERENCES
1. J- P. Law1er3 ''The effect of entrainment at Indian Pol'nt an the
poptilati~n of the Hudson River stripe bass. I' Testimony before
the Atomfc Safety lirens%'ng Boardl, lndian Point nit 2, USAEC
Do~ket, NO. 50-247, April 5, 1972,
2. J. P. Lawler, "Effect of entrainment and impingement at Endjan
Point on the poplalatian of the Hudsogl River striped bass."
Testimony befare the Atomic Safety Licensing Board, Indian Point
Unit 2, USAEC Docket No. 50-247, O~tober 30, 1932.
atusky & Skelly Engineers, "Report on ~ e v ~ l of ~ a ~ ~ ~ r ~ t
redl-time two dimensional made% of the Hudson River striped bass
population "
(Prepared under contract with Cans01 idated Ed-s'son
ew Yard, Inc, > October 1975).
Christensen, 9. Golumbek, and A. Clark,
""Sensitivity analysis of the L-MS tidal -averaged, one-dimensional
transport mdel of the Hudson River striped bass pop la ti an^"
O ~ ~ report, L ~ J Oak ~ Ridw National Laboratory, Oak Ridge,
Tennessee, (In preparation)
5. Letter dated July 13, 1974, from MI.. E. R.. Fidell, attorney for
Co~~o~i~~ted Edison at LeBoeuf, L-amb, Leiby, and MacRae, to
Mr. J.. Scinto, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, including as
an enclosure a document entitled "Dacumentatian for Mathematical
Models of the Hudson River Striped Bass Papulation," dated July
1974 *
6. Letter dated August 11, 1975, from William J. Cahill, Jr. Con-
solidated Edison, to Dr. Richard M. Rush, Oak Ridge National
Laboratory, including as enclosures a source deck for the trans-
port and the completely mixed striped bass life cycle models
developed by Lawler, Matusky Skelly Engineers, a listing far the
two models, and saniple data for testing each of the two models,