the florida state university college of arts and sciences evolution of ...

skewness
0.2
0.1
0
-0.1
-0.2
-0.3
-0.4
-0.5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
y = 0.001x 6 - 0.031x 5 + 0.3704x 4 - 2.1684x 3 + 6.422x 2 - 8.9073x +
4.3342
113
R 2 = 0.6864
location relative to Apalachicola River
Figure 4.39. Location relative to the Apalachicola River mouth versus skewness.
Note: Numbers shown on the x-axis correspond to the numbered locations in
Figure 4.36. (Data source: Balsillie, 1995)
kurtosis
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
y = 0.2232x + 3.0597
R 2 = 0.4137
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
location relative to Apalachicola River
Figure 4.40. Location relative to the Apalachicola River mouth versus kurtosis.
Note: Numbers shown on the x-axis correspond to the numbered locations in
Figure 4.36. (Data source: Balsillie, 1995)