Observers' Perceptions of Self-handicappers' and Sandbaggers ...
Observers' Perceptions of Self-handicappers' and Sandbaggers ... Observers' Perceptions of Self-handicappers' and Sandbaggers ...
Hypotheses: Honesty Fail Succeed Not Claim Injury Claim Injury Not Have Injury Have Injury Not have Injury (SB) (-) (-) Have Injury (SH)
Hypotheses: Insecurity Fail Succeed Not Claim Injury Claim Injury Not Have Injury Have Injury (+) Not have Injury (SB) (+) (+) (+) (+) Have Injury (SH) (+) (+) (+)
- Page 1 and 2: Observers’ Perceptions of Self-ha
- Page 3 and 4: Self-handicapping � Self-presenta
- Page 5 and 6: Sandbagging � Self-presentation s
- Page 7 and 8: Costs of Sandbagging � Observers
- Page 9 and 10: Method � Participants � 97 Intr
- Page 11: (+) Hypotheses: Competence Fail Suc
- Page 15 and 16: Dependent Measures Participants rat
- Page 17 and 18: Results: Honesty Fail Succeed Not C
- Page 19 and 20: Results: Likeability Fail Succeed N
- Page 21 and 22: Future Research � More detailed s
- Page 23: Sandbagging Scenario 1 Justin is ju
Hypotheses: Honesty<br />
Fail<br />
Succeed<br />
Not Claim Injury Claim Injury<br />
Not Have<br />
Injury<br />
Have<br />
Injury<br />
Not have<br />
Injury<br />
(SB)<br />
(-)<br />
(-)<br />
Have<br />
Injury<br />
(SH)