Untitled - Smithsonian Institution

oIbkechts] the SWIMMEK MANUSCRIPT 5
fectly provides for the representation of the former; the latter are
disregarded completely. In the written documents they are there-
fore left to the reader to discover, as in W.'s text here; or else they
are represented by various very clever but inadequate, and especially
quite uncoordinated, devices, as in Ay.'s text, where the stop follow-
ing the t is indicated by writing the -d(o)- syllable for it.
(7) The -ti- phonem, which is so common in Cherokee, has no
specific symbol. It is usually represented by the complex: -(d)a-l(i)-,
as by Ay.; more rarely by: -(d)a-l(a)-, the symbols used in this instance
by W. (W. line 16). In lines 17 and 19, however, W. conforms
to the general usage.
(8) The word as written by Ay. is the nearest approach to the
spoken language; it is, however, commonly written as in W.'s version.
It appears from the foregoing notes that, as I said, the few and
slight differences that can be found are mainly phonetic. These are
not of a nature to invite skepticism as to the accuracy of the texts.
Moreover, since writing them, it has been possible, by further re-
search, to discover additional texts and to obtain from other medicine
men copies of separate formulas. Some of these are identical with
those in the Ay. manuscript. They must be either later copies or
earlier predecessors, if not the actual originals, from which some of
the Ay. formulas were copied.
Comparing two versions wherever this was possible has again proved
that the method used in reconstituting the texts is flawless.
In order not to commit Mr. Mooney's name, and to take my own
responsibility, I have thought it advisable to make a definite statement
as to what part of this paper is Mooney's and how much of it
is my work.
As has already been clearly stated, the credit for the discovery of
the manuscript and for the first work on it is Mooney's. I am also
very much indebted to his former publications on the Cherokee tribe
and to many items of interest found in his manuscript notes. Wher-
ever I have made use of this material this has been expUcitly stated.
Mooney transliterated and translated the formulas (free transla-
tions) and wrote explanatory comments, some of them quite lengthy,
to accompany them. It should be borne in mind that this work was
done by Mooney about 40 years ago, at a time when methods for
studying the native languages and the phonetic notations to record
them had not attained the same degree of perfection they now boast
of. That is the reason why it has been deemed expedient to take
down the texts anew, as has already been explained in detail.
I have, moreover, considered that the value of the texts would be
considerably enhanced by an interlinear translation, which I have consequently
added. The accurate analysis and the grammatical work
necessary to obtain the data for these interlinear translations have in