secret - (SPAWAR) is - The US Navy

secret - (SPAWAR) is - The US Navy secret - (SPAWAR) is - The US Navy

spawar.navy.mil
from spawar.navy.mil More from this publisher
24.01.2013 Views

SKliAV21?ST 5510.36 17 MM iggg upon a challenge within 30 days of receipt and notify the challenger of any changes made as a result of the challenge or the reason(s) no change is being made. 4. If the pereon initiating the challenge is not satisfied with the OCA’S final determination, the decision may be appealed to the CNO (N09N) for review ae the OON’S impartial official. If, after appeal to the CNO (N09N), the challenger is still not satisfied, the decieion may be further appealed to the Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel (ISCAP), established by Section 5.4 of reference (a). 5. These procedure do not apply to or affect the mandatory declassification review actions described in paragraph 4-23. 4-13 RESOLUTION OF COWLICTS BETWESN OCAS 1. Disagreements between two or more 00N OCAS shall be resolved promptly. Normally, mutual consideration of the other party’s position will provide an adeguate basis for agreement. If agreement Cannot be reached, the matter shall be referred to the next senior with original classification authority. If agreement cannot be reache~ at that level, the matter shall be referred for decieion to the CNO (N09N) who shall arbitrate the matter. 2. Action on resolution of conflicts shall not take more than 30 days at each level of consideration. Conflicts shall automatically be referred to the next higher echelon if not resolved within 30 days. 3. Holders of the information in conflict shall protect the information at the higher classification level until the conflict ie resolved. 4-14 TENTATIVE =sIBICATIOM 1. Over classification of information shall be avoided. If there is a reasonable doubt about the need to classify information, it shall not.be classified. 2. Individuals, not having original classification authority, who create information they believe to be classified, or which they have significant doubt about the appropriate classification level, shall mark the information at the lower level and: a. Safeguard the information required for the level of classification; SECNAVIMST 5510.36 4-7

BECNAV121BT 5510.36 I7 Mill1999 b. Mark the first page and/or cover sheet of information ae tentatively claeeified with the intended classification level preceded by the word 9’TBNTATIVB””(e.g. “TENTATIVE SECRET”); and Forward the information through the chain of commend to the ;;xt eenior with original claeeification authority. Include in the tmdy of the transmittal a etatement that the information iS Wtentativelyn marked to protect it in transit, and include a justification for the tentative classification. 3. The OCA ehall make the classification determination within 30 daye. 4. After the OCAte determination, the ,,T=ATI~OS marking ehall be removed and the information shall be remarked to reflect the OCA’S decision. 4-15 PAT= SECRECY INFORMATION 1. Although only official information shall be classified, there are come circumstance in which information not meeting the definition in paragraph 4-2 may warrant protection in the interest of national security. These circumstances may include thoee in paragraphs 4-16 through 4-18. 2. Reference (f) provides that the SECDEF, among others, may determine whether granting a patent disclosure for an invention would be detrimental to national security. The SECNAV hae been delegated the authority to make determinations on behalf of the SECDEF on mattere under the DON cognizance. The Chief of Naval Research (CNR) (Code 300) is the Patent Counsel for the DON and is responsible for making these determinations. When a determination ie made, the Commissioner of Patente, at the request of the CNR, takee epecified actione concerning the granting of a patent and protection of the information. 4-16 INDEPENDENT RESEARCH AND DEVELOPBiENT IIJpO~TION (IR~D)/ BID AND PROPOSAL (B6P) 1. Information that is a product of contractor or individual IR&D/B&P efforts, conducted without prior accese to classified information, and associated with the epecific information in guestion, ehall not be classified unlese: a. The U.S. Government first acguires a proprietary interest in the information; or 4-e SECNAVIl?ST S51O.36

SKliAV21?ST 5510.36<br />

17 MM iggg<br />

upon a challenge within 30 days of receipt and notify the<br />

challenger of any changes made as a result of the challenge or<br />

the reason(s) no change <strong>is</strong> being made.<br />

4. If the pereon initiating the challenge <strong>is</strong> not sat<strong>is</strong>fied with<br />

the OCA’S final determination, the dec<strong>is</strong>ion may be appealed to<br />

the CNO (N09N) for review ae the OON’S impartial official. If,<br />

after appeal to the CNO (N09N), the challenger <strong>is</strong> still not<br />

sat<strong>is</strong>fied, the decieion may be further appealed to the<br />

Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel (ISCAP),<br />

establ<strong>is</strong>hed by Section 5.4 of reference (a).<br />

5. <strong>The</strong>se procedure do not apply to or affect the mandatory<br />

declassification review actions described in paragraph 4-23.<br />

4-13 RESOLUTION OF COWLICTS BETWESN OCAS<br />

1. D<strong>is</strong>agreements between two or more 00N OCAS shall be resolved<br />

promptly. Normally, mutual consideration of the other party’s<br />

position will provide an adeguate bas<strong>is</strong> for agreement. If<br />

agreement Cannot be reached, the matter shall be referred to the<br />

next senior with original classification authority. If agreement<br />

cannot be reache~ at that level, the matter shall be referred for<br />

decieion to the CNO (N09N) who shall arbitrate the matter.<br />

2. Action on resolution of conflicts shall not take more than 30<br />

days at each level of consideration. Conflicts shall<br />

automatically be referred to the next higher echelon if not<br />

resolved within 30 days.<br />

3. Holders of the information in conflict shall protect the<br />

information at the higher classification level until the conflict<br />

ie resolved.<br />

4-14 TENTATIVE =sIBICATIOM<br />

1. Over classification of information shall be avoided. If<br />

there <strong>is</strong> a reasonable doubt about the need to classify<br />

information, it shall not.be classified.<br />

2. Individuals, not having original classification authority,<br />

who create information they believe to be classified, or which<br />

they have significant doubt about the appropriate classification<br />

level, shall mark the information at the lower level and:<br />

a. Safeguard the information required for the level of<br />

classification;<br />

SECNAVIMST 5510.36 4-7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!