22.01.2013 Views

Appellant's Brief - Washington State Courts

Appellant's Brief - Washington State Courts

Appellant's Brief - Washington State Courts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

possible for the jury to infer that Mr. Hendrickson aided in the transmittal<br />

of Mr. Salazar-Guerrero's social security number. RP 40 1.<br />

The trial court denied the motion for directed verdict with respect<br />

to the charges involving Mr. Noe and the boy from Florida because Mr.<br />

Rogers testified that the social security cards related to these two charges<br />

could be used for improper purposes and that since no evidence had been<br />

presented establishing an innocent explanation as to why Mr. Hendrickson<br />

had these cards in his possession, the jury could infer that Mr. Hendrickson<br />

possessed the cards for an unlawfbl purpose. RP 401-402.<br />

Mr. Hendrickson was convicted of the counts of identity theft,<br />

based on the charges relating to Mr. Noe, Mr. Salazar-Guerrero, and the<br />

unknown boy fiom Florida. CP 66-68. The jury hung on the charge of<br />

possession of stolen property. RP 463.<br />

86-89.<br />

Notice of appeal was timely filed on February 22 and 27,2006. CP<br />

IV. SUMMARY OF TESTIMONY<br />

Leo Brulsche<br />

In May or June of 2004, a trailer was stolen from Leo Brutsche's<br />

business in Auburn. RP 47-49. Leo Brutsche reported it stolen, and in<br />

August of 2004 Leo Brutsche's grandson was driving through Tacoma<br />

when he saw the trailer in a parking lot. RP 52-53. Leo Brutsche drove

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!